No, it was not in appropriate to use because it was central to my point. I think it is preferable to have the current variant, rather than a new one that is more deadly. (View Post)

That doesn’t imply anything of the sort. Something that is even marginally deadly is more deadly than something that isn’t deadly at all. (View Post)

Perhaps quoting me in full would reveal what I actually meant. I said any new, more-deadly variant, implying one that hasn't actually mutated yet. (View Post)

It's like saying someone who is a tax payer cannot take part in a debate about cutting taxes. Hopefully she was allowed to attend in the end. (View Post)

But they aren't scientists that are experts in the field of epidemiology, are they? (View Post)