Richard_Tyndall
Richard_Tyndall
Reactions
-
Re: Punters agree with Farage – politicalbetting.com
The other problem being that the criteria for being accepted as a candidate was wanting to be one. They had almost no formal system for accepting candidates let alone vetting them. (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters agree with Farage – politicalbetting.com
Agree entirely. But then I am not sure I would trust anyone in a senior position in Reform to be in charge of vetting. Their basic premise would be sufficient reason for not choosing them in the firs… (View Post)3 -
Re: Punters agree with Farage – politicalbetting.com
Oh I agree. I just work on the basis that keeping the moral highground when it comes to treaties is always the better move. (View Post)1 -
Re: Punters agree with Farage – politicalbetting.com
Whilst his comments on Assad are just weird, his comments on Putin might, from an academic point of view, be considered valid. Simply dismissing someone like Putin as insane does indeed limit ones ab… (View Post)2 -
Re: Punters agree with Farage – politicalbetting.com
Good. Starmer should be doing the same for the British defence industry. What is wrong with promoting your own industries, particularly to allies who will be alongside you if things get hot? (View Post)1
