Richard_Tyndall
-
Re: Rwandan discussions – politicalbetting.com
Exactly. Mind you, you clearly have a better memory than I do. I did Chemistry A level in 1983 as well and can remember absolutely nothing about it :) (View Post)1 -
Re: Rwandan discussions – politicalbetting.com
The whole policy is just fecking stupid from start to finish. The only way I might even consider Rwanda being used (and I am still not convinced about it at all) would be as a destination for asylum … (View Post)1 -
Re: Rwandan discussions – politicalbetting.com
I don't see it. Particularly in light of the ruling yesterday which made it clear that the Rwanda policy is unlawful not just because of the ECHR but because of many other international treaty o… (View Post)1 -
Re: Rwandan discussions – politicalbetting.com
I am afraid taht whilst I agree with 148grss on some things, they do have a tendancy to drift into some rather wild and wooly conspiracy theories which don't hold up to much scrutiny. (View Post)2 -
Re: What are Ministers for? – politicalbetting.com
This was always the most utterly objectionable part of the whole thing. That, if you were found to be a genuine asylum seeker under our own laws and definitions, it didn't matter. You were still… (View Post)4
