Ratters
-
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
I'd be interested to see you share again with sources. It's not in line with what I've seen, but always open to new data. (View Post)1 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
I mean, sure, but the 'epic farce' subsidy price is much, much lower than what we would pay for gas powered electricity at current prices. I think your anger is misdirected. (View Post)2 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
Can I be the first to say I hope Orban ends up more fucked than a stepmum in a country where such pornography is still legal? (View Post)7 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
Yes but this is also before the planned huge increase in wind and solar over the next 5 years or so. And from that page I see gas down at 27% over the past year for electricity. That is significant b… (View Post)4 -
Re: Yes we Kam? – politicalbetting.com
We are currently producing 112% of our electricity needs, with the excess 12% being sent via connectors or to pumped storage. Of the 112%, only 7% is gas power. So over 100% renewable or nuclear. (View Post)6