Ratters
-
Re: The Chancellor’s controversial letter to Chesham and Amersham voters – politicalbetting.com
I agree completely. There was a good reason for a structured prioritisation for the higher risk cohorts, but the key priority for low-risk younger groups is reducing R rather than protecting those ge… (View Post)2 -
Re: Supporting a better infrastructure is fine until it is your house that they want to demolish – polit
A little less whining from you about her would be much appreciated as well. (View Post)3 -
Re: With the Cummings Commons Committee starting at 0930 – the former advisor Tweets a pic of pre-lockdo
Whatever you think of Cummings, this is a refreshing change from Select Committee hearings where people giving evidence obfuscate and try their best not to give much away. Hancock should come under a… (View Post)1 -
Re: The Boris vaccination poll “bounce” will evaporate unless those who’ve had both jabs start to see so
Old people complaining about having the same treatment as the young with respect to holidays, despite the fact all this locking down and vaccine prioritisation has been almost solely on their behalf,… (View Post)8 -
Re: One in nine of those younger than 25 on the YouGov panel don’t even know who Tony Blair was – politi
Some people on here are so excitable they should perhaps release excess energy writing thrillers... Take a deep breath: 1) To the best of our knowledge, the Indian variant is more transmissible varia… (View Post)3