Nigelb
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
It's quite interesting reading this transcript from three years ago: https://www.parliament.uk/business/commons/committee-corridor-podcast/a-criminal-justice-system-in-crisis2/ Not very much see… (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Apparently has around 75% support from French voters. (Possibly less from those likely to be conscripted ?) And in any event, you never know what you'll find floating in a bowl of Pimm's. (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Your curious obsession with "weird Lib Dems" and "centrist dads" marks you out as pretty damn weird yourself. (View Post)3 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
That surcharge is on business properties with a rateable value over £500k. As per the tweet her RV is now £73,500, which is way under that (and would now be subject to the standard RHL multiplier of … (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
The justice system is massively underfunded, thanks to spending cuts over the last decade and a half. Rather than completely changing the basis of how we administer criminal justice (with minimal pub… (View Post)4
