It's part of the ongoing effort to suppress journalism in the US, and it's wildly illegal - or would be if the DOJ were actually enforcing the law. (View Post)

You don't have "50-100k" arriving over the channel each year. (View Post)

That's not really the point. The header was suggesting that Lady Thatcher's approach was somehow better. It wasn't any such thing, IMO. And today's snail pace for getting any refo… (View Post)

It would be nice to turn back the clock, but it will be a slow process. (View Post)

In answer to the header's question about the superiority of the "Thatcher approach", there are a couple of points which might be made. First, it's arguable (and I would so argue) … (View Post)