Nigelb
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Apparently has around 75% support from French voters. (Possibly less from those likely to be conscripted ?) And in any event, you never know what you'll find floating in a bowl of Pimm's. (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Your curious obsession with "weird Lib Dems" and "centrist dads" marks you out as pretty damn weird yourself. (View Post)3 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
That surcharge is on business properties with a rateable value over £500k. As per the tweet her RV is now £73,500, which is way under that (and would now be subject to the standard RHL multiplier of … (View Post)2 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
The justice system is massively underfunded, thanks to spending cuts over the last decade and a half. Rather than completely changing the basis of how we administer criminal justice (with minimal pub… (View Post)4 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Agreed; as I noted on the last thread, this budget is basically an irrelevance in the greater scheme of things (unless you count the missed opportunity to do something significant). There's plen… (View Post)1
