Malmesbury
Malmesbury
Reactions
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
a Hang on, aren't you an accountant? https://www.tiktok.com/@yourmoviesbox/video/7214231995172375814 ? Though that's obviously Hollywood license. No qualified CPA would invest in the extra … (View Post)1 -
Re: We need to talk about abolishing the budget – politicalbetting.com
First Something to be said for this. Perhaps as a continuing plan - Budget as a river, rather than point in time? So the Budget is a continually evolving structure? (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
The comments on the abolition of Grand Juries in the UK are of interest.... 1933 Edward Cavendish, Marquess of Hartington MP (Con) - Whilst there might be an overwhelming case to abolish Grand Juries… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
a Interestingly, such URL probing might e considered to come under the computer misuse laws. The funniest version of that was a case in the US, where an idiot prosecutor tried to claim *reading the d… (View Post)1 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Don't tend to talk direct politics with other adults - apart from the usual damn the government stuff. Clear from the things they damn the government for, that about half of them are to the left… (View Post)1
