IanB2
-
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Freedman's conclusion: Barring unexpected scandals or disasters Starmer and Reeves should now be safe until the May local elections, giving themselves time to shore up support. But the cost of choosi… (View Post)8 -
Re: Voters back restricting trial by jury (but not for themselves) – politicalbetting.com
Neave was prominent in wanting to take a more aggressive, military approach to the IRA, beliving that he could 'win the war' by flooding the province with troops including the special forces. That's … (View Post)1 -
Re: A 28% return in just over a month? – politicalbetting.com
It’s not that. Somehow, we seem to be the only ones who haven’t been seduced either by untried snake oil, don’t believe that a year out of office during which they have made no attempt to learn from … (View Post)3 -
Re: A 28% return in just over a month? – politicalbetting.com
What it’s doing is extraordinarily clever, but understanding, in any meaningful sense, what it’s producing, it is not. (View Post)1 -
Re: A 28% return in just over a month? – politicalbetting.com
Those baskets are really useful. I have one that was a gift from someone; after they’d finished with the contents, obvs (View Post)1
