How about if they thought there just a tiny chance they would be sent to Rwanda - say 300 out of 30,000 or so? (View Post)

Of course the prospect of being flown to Kigali won't be a deterrent to people who are willing to risk their lives trying to cross the Channel. Sunak's inanity knows no bounds. (View Post)

Even if the legislation turns watertight, is there anything to prevent it being taken back to the Supreme Court and delayed while the Court considers whether it is watertight? (View Post)

The irony is that however catastrophic something was, someone on the Internet will still think it "wasn't far from what was needed". (View Post)

Or his great-grandson would have become prime minister and cooked up a vote-winning scheme to send other people to Rwanda. (View Post)