politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Trump’s widely condemned comment about banning Muslims from

Donald Trump’s statement about stopping Muslims from entering the US has been widely condemned both in America and round the world. In the UK David Cameron has joined those attacking the current GOP front runner and possibly the next President.
Comments
-
Sidney
New client staked £1000 to be candidate at 5/2,& £1000 to be President, 9/2, on Donald Trump in a Hill's Cambridgeshire shop today. #Trump0 -
I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.0
-
"You ain't no PB Tory, bruv!"TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
0 -
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
0 -
You have hair envy ?TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
0 -
I can only assume he wants to be unpopular and save himself from a Brewster's Millions scenario.
He's a very clever chap who plays the media like the Devil's Fiddle. He doesn't want the drudge of POTUS and all the limitations it entails.
Unfortunately, the more outrageous he becomes - the more the polls move in his favour.0 -
Ein volk, ein reich, Ein Betslip.0
-
I like the Brewsters Millions analogy....as much as he tries to lose votes, he keeps gaining them.Plato_Says said:I can only assume he wants to be unpopular and save himself from a Brewster's Millions scenario.
He's a very clever chap who plays the media like the Devil's Fiddle. He doesn't want the drudge of POTUS and all the limitations it entails.
Unfortunately, the more outrageous he becomes - the more the polls move in his favour.0 -
Part of the problem is the strong belief amongst some people in England that England equals the United Kingdom.Theuniondivvie said:What a cock (Toby Young that is, not the mighty Michael Rosen).
twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/674167045563502592
As such they equate entirely English concepts such as an Established church as being British concepts. They are not.
The United Kingdom has no established church and the institutions of society should change to reflect that. A ban onIndoctrination campsfaith schools would be a good start. The SNP could do this in Scotland and their cowardice on the issue is very poor.0 -
I seriously doubt the Donald revels in UNpopularity!Plato_Says said:I can only assume he wants to be unpopular and save himself from a Brewster's Millions scenario.
He's a very clever chap who plays the media like the Devil's Fiddle. He doesn't want the drudge of POTUS and all the limitations it entails.
Unfortunately, the more outrageous he becomes - the more the polls move in his favour.0 -
Also the reaction to FN in France as a "fascist" "uprising" - it was a democratic vote, FFS!felix said:
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
0 -
The Donald has to be the most successful Twitter Troll ever...5 million+ followers.0
-
Donald Trump saying this is so unsurprising. The only thing I'm shocked about is that this is a new statement from him, tbh.
FPT:
I don't see why not; when many PBers have mentioned the site's changes several times in recent months. I don't see why I should reject their views, but yet accept your assessment of PB.Plato_Says said:Don't claim to know what PBers have thought over the years or their abundance before you joined this forum. It's very simple.
The_Apocalypse said:@Plato_Says I know that 'many' have, that's why I mentioned it in my post to you. Just because it isn't an opinion which coincides with your own, doesn't mean it's not valid. It would be curious if all perspectives of the last 7 years of a political website were all the same.
You keep on mentioning 'stop digging'. I don't particularly agree with that assessment of my posts, much like you don't agree with other views of how PB was in the past.0 -
Another expert on what other people think...Dair said:
Part of the problem is the strong belief amongst some people in England that England equals the United Kingdom.Theuniondivvie said:What a cock (Toby Young that is, not the mighty Michael Rosen).
twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/674167045563502592
ZZZ0 -
9/2 for POTUS?TheScreamingEagles said:Sidney
New client staked £1000 to be candidate at 5/2,& £1000 to be President, 9/2, on Donald Trump in a Hill's Cambridgeshire shop today. #Trump
That's criminal.0 -
This is the old problem for the Republicans – the party base is much more likely to warm to a hard-line appeal when what’s needed to win the White House itself requires very different positioning.
I could swear Ive seen a similar phenomenon else where.....give me a minute...it'll come to me....0 -
The amusing thing is that Trump has barely spent a dime relatively speaking on his campaign.
One thing for sure, the man is on a massive ego trip. Anyone who doesn't think he wants to be president is kidding themselves. POTUS is still the most powerful position in the world.0 -
0
-
We are missing another article relevant to this thread.
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/news/international/trump-claims-islam-fked-up-his-hair-20151208104538
"Trump warned that unless all Muslims were excluded from the United States, the country faced catastrophic baldness and terrorism.
He added: “My greatest fear is that if we allow them to stay here and breed then something even worse will happen to my hair.
“Have you ever seen a bald Muslim? No, you haven’t. They all have fantastic, thick hair because they use their magic to steal our hair."0 -
He should just come out in favour of abortion. He would be cast into the GOP Abyss in a matter of minutes.FrancisUrquhart said:
I like the Brewsters Millions analogy....as much as he tries to lose votes, he keeps gaining them.Plato_Says said:I can only assume he wants to be unpopular and save himself from a Brewster's Millions scenario.
He's a very clever chap who plays the media like the Devil's Fiddle. He doesn't want the drudge of POTUS and all the limitations it entails.
Unfortunately, the more outrageous he becomes - the more the polls move in his favour.0 -
Yes, it's a shocking bet. It implies a 63% probability he'll beat Hilary if you think the 5-2 is also correct (It is skinny too).Pong said:
9/2 for POTUS?TheScreamingEagles said:Sidney
New client staked £1000 to be candidate at 5/2,& £1000 to be President, 9/2, on Donald Trump in a Hill's Cambridgeshire shop today. #Trump
That's criminal.0 -
I'm not dragging this into a new thread, so won't reply.The_Apocalypse said:
Donald Trump saying this is so unsurprising. The only thing I'm shocked about is that this is a new statement from him, tbh.
FPT:
I don't see why not; when many PBers have mentioned the site's changes several times in recent months. I don't see why I should reject their views, but yet accept your assessment of PB.Plato_Says said:Don't claim to know what PBers have thought over the years or their abundance before you joined this forum. It's very simple.
The_Apocalypse said:@Plato_Says I know that 'many' have, that's why I mentioned it in my post to you. Just because it isn't an opinion which coincides with your own, doesn't mean it's not valid. It would be curious if all perspectives of the last 7 years of a political website were all the same.
You keep on mentioning 'stop digging'. I don't particularly agree with that assessment of my posts, much like you don't agree with other views of how PB was in the past.0 -
It is a pattern, last week he tweeted some shooting figures were clearly made up and racist.felix said:
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
The fact several GOPers criticised him straight away tells you Trump's jumped a new shark.0 -
Indeed, as Pulpstar said on the previous thread, he's getting some free hospitality soonPong said:
9/2 for POTUS?TheScreamingEagles said:Sidney
New client staked £1000 to be candidate at 5/2,& £1000 to be President, 9/2, on Donald Trump in a Hill's Cambridgeshire shop today. #Trump
That's criminal.0 -
Tbh He'd have been better off putting £2000 on at 5-2 for the nomination.
Then plonking down £2500 on Trump once he's won the nomination.0 -
Sigmund @Dair - who are we mere mortals to disagree?TGOHF said:
Another expert on what other people think...Dair said:
Part of the problem is the strong belief amongst some people in England that England equals the United Kingdom.Theuniondivvie said:What a cock (Toby Young that is, not the mighty Michael Rosen).
twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/674167045563502592
ZZZ0 -
@Plato_Says That's fine.
Don't worry, it's all over nowSunil_Prasannan said:@The_Apocalypse
@Plato_Says
Somebody fetch the bikinis and mud!!
0 -
No. It's simply that he's an idiot. He wants to shut down the Internet. I don't think that it's sanctimonious to point that out, whether you are politically on the left or right (and many on the right are doing just that).felix said:
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/7/9869308/donald-trump-close-up-the-internet-bill-gates
"We're losing a lot of people because of the internet," Trump said. "We have to see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening. We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that internet up in some ways. Somebody will say, 'Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people."0 -
Should I take the 50/1 on an Independent candidate winning the Presidency?Pulpstar said:Tbh He'd have been better off putting £2000 on at 5-2 for the nomination.
If Trump gets the nomination, I can see someone like Bloomberg running as an Independent.
Edit: Has a 50/1 shot ever been a winner in a US Presidential race?0 -
Did you win? *puts special stirring spoon away again*The_Apocalypse said:@Plato_Says That's fine.
Don't worry, it's all over nowSunil_Prasannan said:@The_Apocalypse
@Plato_Says
Somebody fetch the bikinis and mud!!0 -
We've been told that Trump 'stands up' for freedom of speech though. It seems that's not the case....logical_song said:
No. It's simply that he's an idiot. He wants to shut down the Internet. I don't think that it's sanctimonious to point that out, whether you are politically on the left or right (and many on the right are doing just that).felix said:
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/7/9869308/donald-trump-close-up-the-internet-bill-gates
"We're losing a lot of people because of the internet," Trump said. "We have to see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening. We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that internet up in some ways. Somebody will say, 'Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people."0 -
Has he beheaded anybody?
Has he blown up any airliners?
Has he enslaved girls from a slightly different sect?
No, no, and no again!0 -
What odds would you back trump at?Pulpstar said:
Yes, it's a shocking bet. It implies a 63% probability he'll beat Hilary if you think the 5-2 is also correct (It is skinny too).Pong said:
9/2 for POTUS?TheScreamingEagles said:Sidney
New client staked £1000 to be candidate at 5/2,& £1000 to be President, 9/2, on Donald Trump in a Hill's Cambridgeshire shop today. #Trump
That's criminal.
I can't put a convincing argument together to justify odds lower than 33/1 for POTUS & 10/1 for the NOM.
Still, I guess I missed a trick not foreseeing & then riding the trump surge. Perhaps his odds have further to fall?
I won't be betting on a phenomenon I don't understand.
;/0 -
I think that's a judgement that's in the eye of the beholderAnorak said:
Did you win? *puts special stirring spoon away again*The_Apocalypse said:@Plato_Says That's fine.
Don't worry, it's all over nowSunil_Prasannan said:@The_Apocalypse
@Plato_Says
Somebody fetch the bikinis and mud!!0 -
If that's the only way we are measuring people these days then most of us are brilliant!Sunil_Prasannan said:Has he beheaded anybody?
Has he blown up any airliners?
Has he enslaved girls from a slightly different sect?
No, no, and no again!0 -
Back (Bet For)Pong said:
What odds would you back trump at?Pulpstar said:
Yes, it's a shocking bet. It implies a 63% probability he'll beat Hilary if you think the 5-2 is also correct (It is skinny too).Pong said:
9/2 for POTUS?TheScreamingEagles said:Sidney
New client staked £1000 to be candidate at 5/2,& £1000 to be President, 9/2, on Donald Trump in a Hill's Cambridgeshire shop today. #Trump
That's criminal.
I can't put a convincing argument together to justify odds lower than 33/1 for POTUS & 10/1 for the NOM.
Still, I guess I missed a trick not foreseeing & then riding the trump surge. Perhaps his odds have further to fall?
I won't be betting on a phenomenon I don't understand.
;/
Donald Trump 5.69 £38.00 £178.10
Lay (Bet Against)
Donald Trump 7.56 £58.00 £380.20
I have changed my mind a few times on the Donald...
He is my best result currently, due to Hills laying me £10 at 28-1 for the nomination mainly.
Why would you put him at ~ 10-1 for the nomination ?0 -
My attempt at trolling TSEThe_Apocalypse said:
If that's the only way we are measuring people these days then most of us are brilliant!Sunil_Prasannan said:Has he beheaded anybody?
Has he blown up any airliners?
Has he enslaved girls from a slightly different sect?
No, no, and no again!:
0 -
He'd have been better of betting on betfair.Pulpstar said:Tbh He'd have been better off putting £2000 on at 5-2 for the nomination.
Then plonking down £2500 on Trump once he's won the nomination.
Or even better off not betting at all.
If said punter is lurking on PB, please do get in touch. I have a very special offer on some magic beans.0 -
Sunil_Prasannan said:
My attempt at trolling TSEThe_Apocalypse said:
If that's the only way we are measuring people these days then most of us are brilliant!Sunil_Prasannan said:Has he beheaded anybody?
Has he blown up any airliners?
Has he enslaved girls from a slightly different sect?
No, no, and no again!:
If you have to explain it, you're not trolling...
0 -
Indeed - this latest and one of many similar from the no mark Ian DaleSunil_Prasannan said:
Also the reaction to FN in France as a "fascist" "uprising" - it was a democratic vote, FFS!felix said:
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
"Any American who is even vaguely considering supporting Donald Trump needs to be certified insane. What a piece of utter bastardry."
Do these people have any idea of the way their smarmy arrogance is received by ordinary people? What an utter twonk!0 -
Trolling has to be subtle, I'm happy to give you lessons.Sunil_Prasannan said:
My attempt at trolling TSEThe_Apocalypse said:
If that's the only way we are measuring people these days then most of us are brilliant!Sunil_Prasannan said:Has he beheaded anybody?
Has he blown up any airliners?
Has he enslaved girls from a slightly different sect?
No, no, and no again!:
0 -
"You ain't no Muslim, Bruv!"TheScreamingEagles said:
Trolling has to be subtle, I'm happy to give you lessons.Sunil_Prasannan said:
My attempt at trolling TSEThe_Apocalypse said:
If that's the only way we are measuring people these days then most of us are brilliant!Sunil_Prasannan said:Has he beheaded anybody?
Has he blown up any airliners?
Has he enslaved girls from a slightly different sect?
No, no, and no again!:
0 -
No doubt you'll still be wringing your hands when he has been sworn in.logical_song said:
No. It's simply that he's an idiot. He wants to shut down the Internet. I don't think that it's sanctimonious to point that out, whether you are politically on the left or right (and many on the right are doing just that).felix said:
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/7/9869308/donald-trump-close-up-the-internet-bill-gates
"We're losing a lot of people because of the internet," Trump said. "We have to see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening. We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that internet up in some ways. Somebody will say, 'Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people."0 -
Guardian letter writing campaign should seal the deal for Trump.0
-
My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?0 -
Well.....they're 84% right.....which is a heck of a lot closer than the SNP were on oil revenue....Dair said:
Part of the problem is the strong belief amongst some people in England that England equals the United Kingdom.Theuniondivvie said:What a cock (Toby Young that is, not the mighty Michael Rosen).
twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/674167045563502592
Joking apart, its an atrocious article from Toby Young - I'm surprised the Sun published it - it used to have far higher standards of writing - this comes across as a teenage stream of consciousness rant - he even tries to drag in Labour's 'open door' immigration policies as a factor in the decline of christianity - all those Catholic Poles aren't Christian too? Or is it only British born christians that count?0 -
CorrectionCarlottaVance said:
Well.....they're 84% right.....which is a heck of a lot closer than the SNP were on oil revenue....Dair said:
Part of the problem is the strong belief amongst some people in England that England equals the United Kingdom.Theuniondivvie said:What a cock (Toby Young that is, not the mighty Michael Rosen).
twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/674167045563502592
Joking apart, its an atrocious article from Toby Young - I'm surprised the Sun published it - it used to have far higher standards of writing - this comes across as a teenage stream of consciousness rant - he even tries to drag in Labour's 'open door' immigration policies as a factor in the decline of christianity - all those Catholic Poles aren't Christian too? Or is it only British bornChristiansProtestants that count?0 -
Sometimes Betfair doesn't believe something is happening even if it hits you square in the face.
Fury by Unanimous Dec 4.00
After the fight had finished.0 -
No.felix said:
No doubt you'll still be wringing your hands when he has been sworn in.logical_song said:
No. It's simply that he's an idiot. He wants to shut down the Internet. I don't think that it's sanctimonious to point that out, whether you are politically on the left or right (and many on the right are doing just that).felix said:
I disagree with trump's comments but the sanctimonious liberal left hand-wringing today inside and outside the US irritates me almost as much. He is clearly articulating a widely held view and these silly blanket condemnations are invariably counter-productive.TheScreamingEagles said:I hope not. I think I might have allowed my detestation of Trump colour my betting portfolio.
http://www.theverge.com/2015/12/7/9869308/donald-trump-close-up-the-internet-bill-gates
"We're losing a lot of people because of the internet," Trump said. "We have to see Bill Gates and a lot of different people that really understand what's happening. We have to talk to them about, maybe in certain areas, closing that internet up in some ways. Somebody will say, 'Oh freedom of speech, freedom of speech.' These are foolish people."0 -
You have to wonder why a person leading a party fighting for 3rd place in Scotland thinks it's useful to spend time on twitter hurling personal abuse at a potential presdient. Does she really think this will win over the SNP vote to the blue surge.TheScreamingEagles said:My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?0 -
I'll admit to knowing little about Trump or US politics in general but I can't imagine he'd say that without first researching the potential response. As the thread writer suggests, he is sending out a message that will resonate with plenty, as peculiar as it seems to us.0
-
"Twitter, we're all agreed?" - Echo Chamber alert!felix said:
You have to wonder why a person leading a party fighting for 3rd place in Scotland thinks it's useful to spend time on twitter hurling personal abuse at a potential presdient. Does she really think this will win over the SNP vote to the blue surge.TheScreamingEagles said:My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?0 -
Would be a mistake, Trump was besties with Salmond.felix said:
You have to wonder why a person leading a party fighting for 3rd place in Scotland thinks it's useful to spend time on twitter hurling personal abuse at a potential presdient. Does she really think this will win over the SNP vote to the blue surge.TheScreamingEagles said:My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?
I wonder what attracted the narrow little nationalist to Trump?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/02/11/article-2099742-0449190A0000044D-768_470x288.jpg
Nota bene Sunil, that's how you troll0 -
http://www.duffelblog.com/2015/12/suicide-bombers-work-christmas-day/
Deborah Morgan, an unfulfilled stay-at-home mother of three, says she joined ISIS to “get out of the house.” And while she is grateful to “The All Comprehending One” for “the opportunity to crush the infidels,” she admits she underestimated the flexibility required for waging a global holy war.
“Uh-uh — no way I am working through the break. You know how hard it was to get these John Oates tickets?” said Morgan, who pledged her undying allegiance to ISIS after reading a few memes on social media. “Normally I would say ‘In shaa Allah,’ but this is the talented half of ‘Hall and Oates’ we’re talking about here. And I still have to finish all of my shopping and gift wrapping,” she added, visibly overwhelmed by all she has to get done before her martyrdom.
Surprisingly, not every sleeper is flustered with the last-minute changes. One extremist, Glenn Dansby, is looking forward to his fiery death and highly touted carnal pleasures of the thereafter.
“Yeah, but it has nothing to do with my devotion to Islam or ISIS,” said Dansby, looking around nervously. “I’m stuck spending Christmas with my in-laws.”
0 -
I'll take that into account the next time I mention your friends in IS.TheScreamingEagles said:
Would be a mistake, Trump was besties with Salmond.felix said:
You have to wonder why a person leading a party fighting for 3rd place in Scotland thinks it's useful to spend time on twitter hurling personal abuse at a potential presdient. Does she really think this will win over the SNP vote to the blue surge.TheScreamingEagles said:My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?
I wonder what attracted the narrow little nationalist to Trump?
http://i.dailymail.co.uk/i/pix/2012/02/11/article-2099742-0449190A0000044D-768_470x288.jpg
Nota bene Sunil, that's how you troll0 -
Only accepting Protestants as legitimate would rule out Anglicans, who are almost certainly not a Protestant congregation.Sunil_Prasannan said:
CorrectionCarlottaVance said:
Well.....they're 84% right.....which is a heck of a lot closer than the SNP were on oil revenue....Dair said:
Part of the problem is the strong belief amongst some people in England that England equals the United Kingdom.Theuniondivvie said:What a cock (Toby Young that is, not the mighty Michael Rosen).
twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/674167045563502592
Joking apart, its an atrocious article from Toby Young - I'm surprised the Sun published it - it used to have far higher standards of writing - this comes across as a teenage stream of consciousness rant - he even tries to drag in Labour's 'open door' immigration policies as a factor in the decline of christianity - all those Catholic Poles aren't Christian too? Or is it only British bornChristiansProtestants that count?0 -
FPT:
The spewing of the endless unintelligible right-wing bile from Plato and her ilk is why quite a few people have left this site. However, I do believe in people articulating what they believe in (even if it makes little sense) so my advice to The Apocalypse is just ignore her posts.
Back on-topic: The lack of depth of most Americans is why Trump is still in the game. 9/2 is a snip in my opinion.0 -
Trump: Parts of London 'so radicalised police are afraid for their own lives'
http://www.itv.com/news/story/2015-12-08/trump-parts-of-london-so-radicalised-police-are-afraid-for-their-own-lives/
Speaking to a regular media briefing in Westminster, Mr Cameron's official spokeswoman declined to say whether Mr Trump's comments might lead to him being barred from entry to the UK under hate-speech laws.0 -
@Tigers2iron: Ive used The #SNP oil boom calculator to work out my projected earnings for 2016...It's £1.38million @annetteholliday will be delighted0
-
The Anglican Communion considers itself to be part of the One, Holy, Catholic and Apostolic Church and to be both Catholic and Reformed. For some adherents it represents a non-papal Catholicism, for others a form of Protestantism though without a dominant guiding figure such as Luther, Knox, Calvin, Zwingli or Wesley.[2]Dair said:
Only accepting Protestants as legitimate would rule out Anglicans, who are almost certainly not a Protestant congregation.Sunil_Prasannan said:
CorrectionCarlottaVance said:
Well.....they're 84% right.....which is a heck of a lot closer than the SNP were on oil revenue....Dair said:
Part of the problem is the strong belief amongst some people in England that England equals the United Kingdom.Theuniondivvie said:What a cock (Toby Young that is, not the mighty Michael Rosen).
twitter.com/MichaelRosenYes/status/674167045563502592
Joking apart, its an atrocious article from Toby Young - I'm surprised the Sun published it - it used to have far higher standards of writing - this comes across as a teenage stream of consciousness rant - he even tries to drag in Labour's 'open door' immigration policies as a factor in the decline of christianity - all those Catholic Poles aren't Christian too? Or is it only British bornChristiansProtestants that count?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anglican_Communion0 -
Caroline Lucas steps away from Stop The War.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/12039333/Caroline-Lucas-resigns-from-Stop-the-War-after-finding-herself-unable-to-support-groups-recent-positions.html
As for the claim that she did so a couple of weeks ago, it does seen risible, given that she was happy to sign a round robin letter on Novemeber 26th, and STW had also linked to her opposition at last Wednesday's debate. She could have given BBC Question Time a big scoop had she stepped away from STW during a TV programme.
Perhaps the opportunity to embarass Corbyn was too good to miss.0 -
When I joined in c. 2006 it was at the zenith of Blairite triumphalism - right wing views were very much the minority. The site tends to go in cycles. Some more lefty regulars are in hiding after ramping Labours awesome ground campaign in May.The_Apocalypse said:Donald Trump saying this is so unsurprising. The only thing I'm shocked about is that this is a new statement from him, tbh.
FPT:
I don't see why not; when many PBers have mentioned the site's changes several times in recent months. I don't see why I should reject their views, but yet accept your assessment of PB.Plato_Says said:Don't claim to know what PBers have thought over the years or their abundance before you joined this forum. It's very simple.
The_Apocalypse said:@Plato_Says I know that 'many' have, that's why I mentioned it in my post to you. Just because it isn't an opinion which coincides with your own, doesn't mean it's not valid. It would be curious if all perspectives of the last 7 years of a political website were all the same.
You keep on mentioning 'stop digging'. I don't particularly agree with that assessment of my posts, much like you don't agree with other views of how PB was in the past.
Personally I'm finding the whole right/left thing increasingly clumsy. I think you and I are probably very similar in our attitudes to social issues though our language might differ.
I am, however, super-dry fiscally. I think Osborne is a raging socialist who is doing a great deal of lasting harm to our economy. It's tragic that I literally have no alternative. He is the best man for the job, which speaks volumes for the paucity of political talent in this country.0 -
-
Brent crude oil prices crash below $40 for the first time in seven yearsScott_P said:@Tigers2iron: Ive used The #SNP oil boom calculator to work out my projected earnings for 2016...It's £1.38million @annetteholliday will be delighted
http://www.cityam.com/230439/brent-crude-oil-prices-pull-away-from-nearly-seven-year-lows0 -
I may be entirely wrong, but I've always thought of Lucas as a real Greenie - she dresses like she dyes her own clothes with beetroots. The watermelon Greenies have defected to Corbynistas.dr_spyn said:
Caroline Lucas steps away from Stop The War.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/12039333/Caroline-Lucas-resigns-from-Stop-the-War-after-finding-herself-unable-to-support-groups-recent-positions.html
As for the claim that she did so a couple of weeks ago, it does seen risible, given that she was happy to sign a round robin letter on Novemeber 26th, and STW had also linked to her opposition at last Wednesday's debate. She could have given BBC Question Time a big scoop had she stepped away from STW during a TV programme.
Perhaps the opportunity to embarass Corbyn was too good to miss.0 -
HoL throws out votes for 16-17 yo 's in the EU ref.0
-
Hell YES!TGOHF said:
HoL throws out votes for 16-17 yo 's in the EU ref.
0 -
Labour's shadow City minister Richard Burgon remains a man of mystery in the Square Mile
The closest this Leeds MP has come to a tete-a-tete with industry leaders is a letter from the CBI, who’ve asked for a meeting. However, Burgon appears to be in no hurry to acquiesce. A spokesman from the confederation admitted that coffee “has yet to be set up.”
http://www.cityam.com/230394/labours-shadow-city-minister-richard-burgon-remains-a-man-of-mystery-in-the-square-mile0 -
House of Commons you mean?TGOHF said:HoL throws out votes for 16-17 yo 's in the EU ref.
0 -
I can't understand why somebody playing with that amount of money wouldn't consult an odds-checker first, unless they were doing it on a whim. Even so, a weird whim.Pong said:
He'd have been better of betting on betfair.Pulpstar said:Tbh He'd have been better off putting £2000 on at 5-2 for the nomination.
Then plonking down £2500 on Trump once he's won the nomination.
Or even better off not betting at all.
If said punter is lurking on PB, please do get in touch. I have a very special offer on some magic beans.0 -
Sky News NewsdeskVerified account
@SkyNewsBreak
The House of Commons has voted against plans to lower the voting age for the EU referendum to include 16 and 17-year-olds0 -
I had Con Maj as about a 5% chance in the last few days of the campaign and bet on it at over 20/1 (highest odds were 25/1 on the evening of May 6th), as posted here;Pulpstar said:Also @Pong What was your estimate of the probability of Tory Majority just before the GE - you're an excellent bettor (Very well done on Oldham !), but are you sure you haven't let your anti-Trump prejudices cloud your judgement here a touch ?
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2015/05/06/another-3-polls-have-it-neck-and-neck/
Given all the evidence we had, Con Maj WAS a very unlikely outcome.0 -
Good.dr_spyn said:Sky News NewsdeskVerified account
@SkyNewsBreak
The House of Commons has voted against plans to lower the voting age for the EU referendum to include 16 and 17-year-olds0 -
Good – now let’s increase the voting age to 21…TGOHF said:HoL throws out votes for 16-17 yo 's in the EU ref.
(Runs away and hides behind sofa.)
0 -
Labour today stepped up its attack on Zac Goldsmith accusing him of running a “coded racist” mayoral campaign.
The party went on the offensive after a Tory “Who is Sadiq Khan?” video, criticising him over his Heathrow stance, union links and support for Jeremy Corbyn, led to a string of offensive comments on Facebook.
Labour also hit out at a Tory four-page newspaper that condemns Mr Khan as a “divisive and radical” politician.
Shadow employment minister Emily Thornberry said: “London is the most diverse and tolerant city in the world but Goldsmith and the Tories are running a divisive and dog-whistling campaign - trying to turn London’s communities against each other.”
A source close to Mr Khan branded the Tory campaign as “coded racist”.
http://bit.ly/1NTp47s0 -
Sign here.....
Petition Seeks To Ban Donald Trump From U.K. Over Hate Speech
(Its not online yet,,,,,,)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-hate-speech-ban-uk_566631fee4b079b2818fe0eb?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016§ion=politics0 -
Playing the race card early I see...TheScreamingEagles said:Labour today stepped up its attack on Zac Goldsmith accusing him of running a “coded racist” mayoral campaign.
The party went on the offensive after a Tory “Who is Sadiq Khan?” video, criticising him over his Heathrow stance, union links and support for Jeremy Corbyn, led to a string of offensive comments on Facebook.
Labour also hit out at a Tory four-page newspaper that condemns Mr Khan as a “divisive and radical” politician.
Shadow employment minister Emily Thornberry said: “London is the most diverse and tolerant city in the world but Goldsmith and the Tories are running a divisive and dog-whistling campaign - trying to turn London’s communities against each other.”
A source close to Mr Khan branded the Tory campaign as “coded racist”.
http://bit.ly/1NTp47s0 -
Oh god....Twitter mob at it again. Give it a few hours and the Guardian, BBC etc will be promoting it. Then when it hits 50,000, another report, rinse and repeat....CarlottaVance said:Sign here.....
Petition Seeks To Ban Donald Trump From U.K. Over Hate Speech
(Its not online yet,,,,,,)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-hate-speech-ban-uk_566631fee4b079b2818fe0eb?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016§ion=politics
Funny how we don't here the same in regards to banning genuine hate preachers, just when it is the nasty right wingers like Trump and Geert Wilders.0 -
Let the ping-pong begin...dr_spyn said:Sky News NewsdeskVerified account
@SkyNewsBreak
The House of Commons has voted against plans to lower the voting age for the EU referendum to include 16 and 17-year-olds
(Or should that be wiff-waff?)0 -
What we need now is the calm rhetoric of George Galloway in this race.FrancisUrquhart said:
Playing the race card early I see...TheScreamingEagles said:Labour today stepped up its attack on Zac Goldsmith accusing him of running a “coded racist” mayoral campaign.
The party went on the offensive after a Tory “Who is Sadiq Khan?” video, criticising him over his Heathrow stance, union links and support for Jeremy Corbyn, led to a string of offensive comments on Facebook.
Labour also hit out at a Tory four-page newspaper that condemns Mr Khan as a “divisive and radical” politician.
Shadow employment minister Emily Thornberry said: “London is the most diverse and tolerant city in the world but Goldsmith and the Tories are running a divisive and dog-whistling campaign - trying to turn London’s communities against each other.”
A source close to Mr Khan branded the Tory campaign as “coded racist”.
http://bit.ly/1NTp47s0 -
Doesn't it make you proud to be British?FrancisUrquhart said:
Oh god....Twitter mob at it again.CarlottaVance said:Sign here.....
Petition Seeks To Ban Donald Trump From U.K. Over Hate Speech
(Its not online yet,,,,,,)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-hate-speech-ban-uk_566631fee4b079b2818fe0eb?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016§ion=politics0 -
Thornberry is political box offfice poison. Her statement should sound reasonable, sadly she just sounds stupid. It's yet more vacuous rhetoric.TheScreamingEagles said:Labour today stepped up its attack on Zac Goldsmith accusing him of running a “coded racist” mayoral campaign.
The party went on the offensive after a Tory “Who is Sadiq Khan?” video, criticising him over his Heathrow stance, union links and support for Jeremy Corbyn, led to a string of offensive comments on Facebook.
Labour also hit out at a Tory four-page newspaper that condemns Mr Khan as a “divisive and radical” politician.
Shadow employment minister Emily Thornberry said: “London is the most diverse and tolerant city in the world but Goldsmith and the Tories are running a divisive and dog-whistling campaign - trying to turn London’s communities against each other.”
A source close to Mr Khan branded the Tory campaign as “coded racist”.
http://bit.ly/1NTp47s
Oh Labour, where have all your people with real political heft gone? It's come to a pretty pass when Margaret Beckett is probably one of your titans.0 -
I trust that we are all going to the Stop the War Christmas dinner on Friday. I have just received the raffle prize list.
A candlelit dinner for two with Diane Abbott MP
A Game of Drones DVD box set Series 1-6
Hamper of organic vegetables from Jeremys allotment
Manhole cover from Jeremys collection,personally signed by him
Weekend break for two in Raqqa,flights courtesy of RAF
Meet the Masterchef. Vladimir Putin comes to your kitchen and demonstrates how to roast
Turkey.
Bring your own crackers. We all are.0 -
I fail to see why we're about to ban Donald Trump when we've let Robert Mugabe and plenty of others in.0
-
And guaranteeing a lot more views for the Video......FrancisUrquhart said:
Playing the race card early I see...TheScreamingEagles said:Labour today stepped up its attack on Zac Goldsmith accusing him of running a “coded racist” mayoral campaign.
The party went on the offensive after a Tory “Who is Sadiq Khan?” video, criticising him over his Heathrow stance, union links and support for Jeremy Corbyn, led to a string of offensive comments on Facebook.
Labour also hit out at a Tory four-page newspaper that condemns Mr Khan as a “divisive and radical” politician.
Shadow employment minister Emily Thornberry said: “London is the most diverse and tolerant city in the world but Goldsmith and the Tories are running a divisive and dog-whistling campaign - trying to turn London’s communities against each other.”
A source close to Mr Khan branded the Tory campaign as “coded racist”.
http://bit.ly/1NTp47s
A bit like complaining about the 'terrorist sympathiser' comment......0 -
She's great. Is there a politician in the UK better at using twitter? I can't think of one. It needs brevity and wit. Very, very few politicians can manage either.TheScreamingEagles said:My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?0 -
They can't. Is now a money bill, it leaves the Lords as impotent as a eunuch that's lost his viagraSandyRentool said:
Let the ping-pong begin...dr_spyn said:Sky News NewsdeskVerified account
@SkyNewsBreak
The House of Commons has voted against plans to lower the voting age for the EU referendum to include 16 and 17-year-olds
(Or should that be wiff-waff?)0 -
The last sentence should be. Please don't bring crackers, we don't believe in explosives and besides we are all crackers anyway.dyingswan said:I trust that we are all going to the Stop the War Christmas dinner on Friday. I have just received the raffle prize list.
A candlelit dinner for two with Diane Abbott MP
A Game of Drones DVD box set Series 1-6
Hamper of organic vegetables from Jeremys allotment
Manhole cover from Jeremys collection,personally signed by him
Weekend break for two in Raqqa,flights courtesy of RAF
Meet the Masterchef. Vladimir Putin comes to your kitchen and demonstrates how to roast
Turkey.
Bring your own crackers. We all are.0 -
Agreed. Hate preachers and nasty right-wing loons/fruitcakes should be treated equally. Ban them all!FrancisUrquhart said:
Oh god....Twitter mob at it again. Give it a few hours and the Guardian, BBC etc will be promoting it. Then when it hits 50,000, another report, rinse and repeat....CarlottaVance said:Sign here.....
Petition Seeks To Ban Donald Trump From U.K. Over Hate Speech
(Its not online yet,,,,,,)
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/trump-hate-speech-ban-uk_566631fee4b079b2818fe0eb?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016§ion=politics
Funny how we don't here the same in regards to banning genuine hate preachers, just when it is the nasty right wingers like Trump and Geert Wilders.0 -
If Cameron wants to pour forth his mediocre soft left views on every water cooler issue, can he just resign and become a second-rate columnist please - he seems to forget he's actually Prime Minister and should sometimes (more often than not) keep his trap shut. He is the polar opposite of speaking quietly and wielding a big stick.0
-
Second place actually, they are fighting for second place and having a leader with wit is one of the main reasons.felix said:
You have to wonder why a person leading a party fighting for 3rd place in Scotland thinks it's useful to spend time on twitter hurling personal abuse at a potential presdient. Does she really think this will win over the SNP vote to the blue surge.TheScreamingEagles said:My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?0 -
''Agreed. Hate preachers and nasty right-wing loons/fruitcakes should be treated equally. Ban them all!''
Nah, let them all speak. Total free speech. Let's know what everybody really thinks. Its much better that way.
The moment the BNP got airtime, that was the start of its decline.0 -
Is it just me or is there something ironic about people wanting to ban somebody from coming into the country, because they object to said individual views on wanting to ban other people?
WHAT DO WE WANT...BAN THE DONALD...WHY DO WE WANT IT...BECAUSE WE ARE AGAINST BANNING PEOPLE...0 -
She should leave the Mother-in-law of Parliaments, and join the mother of all Parliaments.DavidL said:
She's great. Is there a politician in the UK better at using twitter? I can't think of one. It needs brevity and wit. Very, very few politicians can manage either.TheScreamingEagles said:My favourite Tory nails it via the medium of Shakespeare.
@RuthDavidsonMSP: So, twitter, we're all agreed? Trump's a clay-brained guts, knotty-pated fool, whoreson obscene greasy tallow-catch, right?
Her tweet to Jim Murphy during the election summed up her awesomeness.0 -
I suspect that almost any attack on Khan by Zac will be labelled as "coded racist".TheScreamingEagles said:Labour today stepped up its attack on Zac Goldsmith accusing him of running a “coded racist” mayoral campaign.
The party went on the offensive after a Tory “Who is Sadiq Khan?” video, criticising him over his Heathrow stance, union links and support for Jeremy Corbyn, led to a string of offensive comments on Facebook.
Labour also hit out at a Tory four-page newspaper that condemns Mr Khan as a “divisive and radical” politician.
Shadow employment minister Emily Thornberry said: “London is the most diverse and tolerant city in the world but Goldsmith and the Tories are running a divisive and dog-whistling campaign - trying to turn London’s communities against each other.”
A source close to Mr Khan branded the Tory campaign as “coded racist”.
http://bit.ly/1NTp47s
It's this sort of nastiness - straight out of the Lutfur Rahman playbook - that makes him totally unsuitable to be Mayor of London, and a sign of things to come if he wins.0 -
Completely of topic, but does anybody have any thoughts/opinion/predictions about how the elections for the Police and Crime commissioners, will go? They will be happening next may alongside many other elections.
A few observations from the last elections in Nov 2012:
Very low tern out, possibly because they where new and people did not fully understand, but I think also because there where no other elections on the same day, and being November it was cold and that may have deterred some people from voting.
The smaller party's, UKIP, LibDem and Green, did not contest all of the seats, 24,24 and 1 respectfully.
Independents did remarkably well, (compated to other elections) getting to the best 2 'run off' in 16 and winning 11.
Possible predictions for next time.
Higher tern out, especially as there will be locals elections in some of the places on the same day.
Miner party's more likely to put up more candida's, especially UKIP, in an attempt to show the parties Vitality.
This May Ironically take some votes for the independents, so more votes could come down to 'Con V Lab' in the 'Run Off'
This will allow each of the 2 big party's to gain some seats, and therefore clamed a victory of sorts. But the Power of incumbency will still have some effect and some of the currant independents will remain.
Because there will be more 'Con V Lab' Some of the Corbynistars will be shocked to discover that not everybody who voted other that Con in the first round automatically votes for Lab as second preference. But rather than sit down to think and analyse why that is, they will just declare everybody to be 'Tory Scum'
Any way, Love to hear anybody else's opinions, Link here for Wikipedia reference:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/England_and_Wales_police_and_crime_commissioner_elections,_2012#Warwickshire_Police0