Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Local By-Election Preview : October 15th 2015

SystemSystem Posts: 11,689
edited October 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Local By-Election Preview : October 15th 2015

Chatteris on Cambridgeshire (UKIP defence)
Result of council at last election (2013): Conservatives 32, Liberal Democrats 14, United Kingdom Independence Party 12, Labour 7, Independents 4 (No Overall Control, Conservatives short by 3)
Result of ward at last election (2013):

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,850
    UKIP have tended to fall back in local elections, but have performed well in polling. If their polling holds up, they should win seats in the London and Welsh Assemblies in May. Also, they hardly won anything in the local elections of 2012, so they should still register a fair-sized net gain.

    FPT, Don Brind is entitled to argue that Stephen Harper, Lynton Crosby, and Canadian and British Conservatives play the race card. But, he should produce evidence for this, rather than simply assume that it's a given.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    edited October 2015
    Always the bridesmaid
  • Options
    taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    edited October 2015
    FPT

    If the Dutch polls are correct and Wilders became Dutch PM (or a senior minister), could he even visit the UK (Isn't he banned???).
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    taffys said:

    FPT

    If the Dutch polls are correct and Wilders became Dutch PM (or a senior minister), could he even visit the UK (Isn't he banned???).

    Yeah, Jacqui Smith tried to have him banned but I think that got overturned. I guess they'll fall back as the election approaches but you never know.
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    Surprised nobody has mentioned Thanet Council on here
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,190
    edited October 2015

    Surprised nobody has mentioned Thanet Council on here

    I don't know much about it but it sounds like they've had a disagreement about Manston Airport. I'm always reluctant to read too much into local politics - especially with Ukip, a party who's main concern is very much a national level issue. I tend to think that there are good/bad local councils of all political colours (except Green - they look awful!).
  • Options
    blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    tlg86 said:

    Surprised nobody has mentioned Thanet Council on here

    I don't know much about it but it sounds like they've had a disagreement about Manston Airport. I'm always reluctant to read too much into local politics - especially with Ukip, a party who's main concern is very much a national level issue. I tend to think that their are good/bad local councils of all political colours (except Green - they look awful!).
    I think that's about right, in general the standard of local councillors ( I probably know 30) is awfully low.
    It seems no party has exclusive rights on idiots.
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Interesting one for me tonight, I know Gill Troughton in Cumbria via friends. She is quite a Corbynite.



  • Options
    Sean_FSean_F Posts: 35,850

    tlg86 said:

    Surprised nobody has mentioned Thanet Council on here

    I don't know much about it but it sounds like they've had a disagreement about Manston Airport. I'm always reluctant to read too much into local politics - especially with Ukip, a party who's main concern is very much a national level issue. I tend to think that their are good/bad local councils of all political colours (except Green - they look awful!).
    I think that's about right, in general the standard of local councillors ( I probably know 30) is awfully low.
    It seems no party has exclusive rights on idiots.
    In my experience, about one in three local councillors are capable of purely animal functions.
  • Options
    chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited October 2015
    South Camberwell could be symptomatic of a broader and pointless Green-swing to Labour.

    Mopping up green votes in right-on London where Labour already have the MPs.

    The Labour candidate's name is Octavia. Speaks volumes.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,412
  • Options
    PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 75,930
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-34531013 Corbyn does NOT look happy here, at all.
  • Options
    My guess is that it won't be hugely different from the list that appeared in the Telegraph the other day.

  • Options
    flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903
    chestnut said:

    South Camberwell could be symptomatic of a broader and pointless Green-swing to Labour.

    Mopping up green votes in right-on London where Labour already have the MPs.

    The Labour candidate's name is Octavia. Speaks volumes.

    Oh for the good old days when it used to be 'Herbert'.
  • Options
    JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 39,046
    Off-topic:

    A very sad thought: October 21st 2015 is the date Marty McFly and Doc Brown travelled forward to in Back to the Future Part 2.

    We have six days to invent, build, commercialise and make ubiquitous compact nuclear fusion reactors, hoverboards and flying cars.

    Apple and Tesla have really have been slacking. ;)
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    Off-topic:

    A very sad thought: October 21st 2015 is the date Marty McFly and Doc Brown travelled forward to in Back to the Future Part 2.

    We have six days to invent, build, commercialise and make ubiquitous compact nuclear fusion reactors, hoverboards and flying cars.

    Apple and Tesla have really have been slacking. ;)

    October 21st is Trafalgar day when all right-thinking Englishmen should get just a tad squiffy, or, if they are really patriotic, completely plastered, in celebration of the day we knocked the snot out of the French AND Spanish and in memory of the man would made the glorious victory possible.
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865

    Off-topic:

    A very sad thought: October 21st 2015 is the date Marty McFly and Doc Brown travelled forward to in Back to the Future Part 2.

    We have six days to invent, build, commercialise and make ubiquitous compact nuclear fusion reactors, hoverboards and flying cars.

    Apple and Tesla have really have been slacking. ;)

    Twattery police alert..

    Hover boards not allowed in public places.
    (People's right too freedom laws no 3098- section 2 paragraph -1 subsection alpha.

    You have committed an offence ... 5 credits deducted

    urrgh!
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    UKIP lose their council by-election to the Tories, Labour win theirs.

    Goodnight.
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669

    Off-topic:

    A very sad thought: October 21st 2015 is the date Marty McFly and Doc Brown travelled forward to in Back to the Future Part 2.

    We have six days to invent, build, commercialise and make ubiquitous compact nuclear fusion reactors, hoverboards and flying cars.

    Apple and Tesla have really have been slacking. ;)

    October 21st is Trafalgar day when all right-thinking Englishmen should get just a tad squiffy, or, if they are really patriotic, completely plastered, in celebration of the day we knocked the snot out of the French AND Spanish and in memory of the man would made the glorious victory possible.
    That's as maybe, but in the state of Georgia October 15th is the day 2015 property taxes are due, so I'm about to pay Gwinnett County $2700.
  • Options
    Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    Speedy said:

    UKIP lose their council by-election to the Tories, Labour win theirs.

    Goodnight.

    Yea!! Labour majority nailed on in 2020

    Or not...... Zzzzzzzzzzz
  • Options
    notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    Interesting one for me tonight, I know Gill Troughton in Cumbria via friends. She is quite a Corbynite.



    I'm sure she is, with her seat and Jamie Reed's seat disappearing in boundary review, with what results they'll be fighting over. Jamie Reed had a twitter feed about as bad as Liz's Kendall... Being a Corbynite in such a scenario is a smart move.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    tlg86 said:

    taffys said:

    FPT

    If the Dutch polls are correct and Wilders became Dutch PM (or a senior minister), could he even visit the UK (Isn't he banned???).

    Yeah, Jacqui Smith tried to have him banned but I think that got overturned. I guess they'll fall back as the election approaches but you never know.
    Jacqui Smith.. Worst home Sec I have ever known.. So pleased her attempt to get a sinecure at the BBC failed/ was shot down by the media.. Loathsome individual with "interesting " expenses related to her London?? stays ???
  • Options
    SpeedySpeedy Posts: 12,100
    Trump and Carson threaten to boycott the next GOP debate if it's longer than 2 hours.
    Good, 3 hour debates are tiresome even to the audience.

    http://edition.cnn.com/2015/10/15/politics/trump-carson-cnbc-republican-debate-threaten-pullout/index.html
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    edited October 2015
    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 42,015
    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Dear Dear
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,980
    Moses_ said:

    Off-topic:

    A very sad thought: October 21st 2015 is the date Marty McFly and Doc Brown travelled forward to in Back to the Future Part 2.

    We have six days to invent, build, commercialise and make ubiquitous compact nuclear fusion reactors, hoverboards and flying cars.

    Apple and Tesla have really have been slacking. ;)

    Twattery police alert..

    Hover boards not allowed in public places.
    (People's right too freedom laws no 3098- section 2 paragraph -1 subsection alpha.

    You have committed an offence ... 5 credits deducted

    urrgh!
    Moses, you are fined one-half credit for a sotto voce violation of the Verbal Morality Statute.
  • Options
    ScarpiaScarpia Posts: 29
    South Camberwell (pre boundary changes) was Kate Hoey's ward before she won the Vauxhall by-election in 1989.
    The Dulwich Hamlets FC ground has always been a bone of contention. IIRC they did a deal with Sainsburys - who built a new store in the late 80's next to them I think they may have got a new stadium out of it.
  • Options
    Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 25,472
    JEO said:
    I should hope so - us too surely; I don't know what we're paying the intelligence services for if not.
  • Options
    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Wouldn't polyamorous be suitable in this case?

  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    A reminder of this week's #bbcqt panel http://t.co/1a6oR24tvN
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    edited October 2015
    Repeat apols :blush:
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933

    A reminder of this week's #bbcqt panel http://t.co/1a6oR24tvN

    Ah yes Roger Helmer...

    When he came 2nd in Newark, PBers were saying it wasn't Lab and Lib that voted UKIP, they voted Tory tactically... People had inside apparently... Then at the GE labour got almost exactly the number of votes that UKIP lost... They must love a churn there!
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    edited October 2015
    deleted

  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    The Dem debate was extremely tedious and way too long - basically Bernie, Hillary and a box of rocks.

    The GOP model has a different dynamic - two debates for a start. But 3 hours is a long time.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    edited October 2015

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    What's homophobic? I was thinking 'threes a crowd' in a relationship whatever the sexual preference myself

    Behind closed doors eh?! How liberal of you!!
  • Options

    A reminder of this week's #bbcqt panel http://t.co/1a6oR24tvN

    Urgh, that's a rather bonkers panel even for BBCQT
  • Options
    malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 42,015
    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    What's homophobic? I was thinking 'threes a crowd' in a relationship whatever the sexual preference myself

    Behind closed doors eh?! How liberal of you!!
    Given his normal mental posts, not strange.
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108
    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    edited October 2015
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Who said there was a problem?

    I would say it was uncommon though to live in a tri-relationship, as would the huge majority of people... What % of relationships are of that nature?

    Showing your prejudices oh enlightened one (in your own mind)
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548

    A reminder of this week's #bbcqt panel http://t.co/1a6oR24tvN

    Pretty pisspoor. 3 fruitcakes and two librarians. With Helmer's 'tache we have real potential for low budget viewing.
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108
    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    What's homophobic? I was thinking 'threes a crowd' in a relationship whatever the sexual preference myself

    Behind closed doors eh?! How liberal of you!!
    It's not homophobic per se. It's that you choose to highlight something that happens in heterosexual marriages.

    Marriage is not about love, or sex or children. It is a legal construct which has no real function in 2015. But as a bigot, you despise people who are gay, so you highlight this as a way to create the outrage on which all Kippers feed.

    Luckily the world is smarter than you are, most people are smarter than you are and Kippers are dying out. That, is a very good thing.
  • Options
    CookieCookie Posts: 11,452
    On thread, sort of - can't think of Chatteris without this song coming to mind:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yY2aHxWV1xE
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    malcolmg said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    What's homophobic? I was thinking 'threes a crowd' in a relationship whatever the sexual preference myself

    Behind closed doors eh?! How liberal of you!!
    Given his normal mental posts, not strange.
    Listen up Mr Turnip.. most of your posts are bonkers
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108
    isam said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Who said there was a problem?

    I would say it was uncommon though to live in a tri-relationship, as would the huge majority of people... What % of relationships are of that nature?

    Showing your prejudices oh enlightened one (in your own mind)
    Why did you choose to post it?
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    What's homophobic? I was thinking 'threes a crowd' in a relationship whatever the sexual preference myself

    Behind closed doors eh?! How liberal of you!!
    Actually, I'd rather not see anyone of any persuasion snogging in public. behind closed door is best AFAIAC.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    What's homophobic? I was thinking 'threes a crowd' in a relationship whatever the sexual preference myself

    Behind closed doors eh?! How liberal of you!!
    It's not homophobic per se. It's that you choose to highlight something that happens in heterosexual marriages.

    Marriage is not about love, or sex or children. It is a legal construct which has no real function in 2015. But as a bigot, you despise people who are gay, so you highlight this as a way to create the outrage on which all Kippers feed.

    Luckily the world is smarter than you are, most people are smarter than you are and Kippers are dying out. That, is a very good thing.
    Haha you complete idiot!! You're damned by your own foolish words xxx
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    What's homophobic? I was thinking 'threes a crowd' in a relationship whatever the sexual preference myself

    Behind closed doors eh?! How liberal of you!!
    It's not homophobic per se. It's that you choose to highlight something that happens in heterosexual marriages.

    Marriage is not about love, or sex or children. It is a legal construct which has no real function in 2015. But as a bigot, you despise people who are gay, so you highlight this as a way to create the outrage on which all Kippers feed.

    Luckily the world is smarter than you are, most people are smarter than you are and Kippers are dying out. That, is a very good thing.
    BOLLOCKS.. as per usual.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Who said there was a problem?

    I would say it was uncommon though to live in a tri-relationship, as would the huge majority of people... What % of relationships are of that nature?

    Showing your prejudices oh enlightened one (in your own mind)
    Why did you choose to post it?
    It was an unusual story, if it wasn't it wouldn't have been reported
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Newsnight: 18,000 files in storage according to Camila Batmanghelidjh
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108
    isam said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Who said there was a problem?

    I would say it was uncommon though to live in a tri-relationship, as would the huge majority of people... What % of relationships are of that nature?

    Showing your prejudices oh enlightened one (in your own mind)
    Why did you choose to post it?
    It was an unusual story, if it wasn't it wouldn't have been reported
    Is it that unusual? If you meet a third person you want to bring into an existing relationship then any marriage will create significant legal barriers to that. I wouldn't suggest it is common but it is definitely not that unusual.

    You didn't post such a thing about a heterosexual couple (one of the worlds best known actresses lives in such a situation), you did it because you are a bigot and you despise gay people. You expected to find people joining your pogrom against homosexuals.

    Luckily, there isn't much support for your bigotry. I am glad the world has moved on and you are so isolated.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    edited October 2015
    Hundreds of anagrams - I liked A Balance Jam Mild Thigh and A Handbag Imam Chill Jet

    http://wordsmith.org/anagram/anagram.cgi?anagram=Camila+Batmanghelidjh+&t=1000&a=n
    AndyJS said:

    Newsnight: 18,000 files in storage according to Camila Batmanghelidjh

  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    edited October 2015
    Cookie said:

    On thread, sort of - can't think of Chatteris without this song coming to mind:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yY2aHxWV1xE

    "Time flies by when you are the driver of a train, speeding out of Trumpton with a cargo of cocaine"

    The immortal Half man half biscuit. Perfect for PB train and eighties music buffs.

    https://youtu.be/YFFcgW35JWk
  • Options
    SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    AndyJS said:

    Newsnight: 18,000 files in storage according to Camila Batmanghelidjh

    Any reason given why these case files were not passed onto the appropriate authority so these poor desperate children with special needs can be properly cared for?
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Who said there was a problem?

    I would say it was uncommon though to live in a tri-relationship, as would the huge majority of people... What % of relationships are of that nature?

    Showing your prejudices oh enlightened one (in your own mind)
    Why did you choose to post it?
    It was an unusual story, if it wasn't it wouldn't have been reported
    Is it that unusual? If you meet a third person you want to bring into an existing relationship then any marriage will create significant legal barriers to that. I wouldn't suggest it is common but it is definitely not that unusual.

    You didn't post such a thing about a heterosexual couple (one of the worlds best known actresses lives in such a situation), you did it because you are a bigot and you despise gay people. You expected to find people joining your pogrom against homosexuals.

    Luckily, there isn't much support for your bigotry. I am glad the world has moved on and you are so isolated.
    Yes it is unusual. If it were usual it wouldn't be in the newspapers.

    I didn't post it about a heterosexual couple because the story I read wasn't about a heterosexual couple.

    You can be as aggressive and unpleasant as you like, you're just making yourself look like a rabid moron with a chip on your shoulder looking for a fight. I haven't said anything bigoted or homophobic, you are just projecting.
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108
    isam said:

    Yes it is unusual. If it were usual it wouldn't be in the newspapers.

    I didn't post it about a heterosexual couple because the story I read wasn't about a heterosexual couple.

    It's not actually in the papers. It is on a gay lifestyle website that celebrates how people can be together if they feel a bond and will overcome broken laws as much as they can.

    Unfortunately I don't subscribe or visit any gay lifestyle websites, so I'll leave the reposts to you. And continue to laugh that you seem obsessed with a lifestyle that you and the rest of Kipperdom appears to detest.
  • Options
    Nowt as queer as the PB'ers almost permanently camped on here.
  • Options
    kle4kle4 Posts: 91,820
    Got to stick up for isam on this one - I saw that story and thought it notable because a couple had split up over a guy and now it was a three person relationship. Maybe it's not so uncommon as to be astonishing, but it is not exactly everyday either, or else it wouldn't be reported on at all (and in a more important measure, if it were common we'd see it depicted a lot more often than it is on TV dramas! - not that I've never seen such an arrangement depicted).

    Honestly, for all I know isam is bigoted, for all I know a lot of people on here are, but nothing said on this issue was evidence of that. People say incontestably bigoted and offensive things all the time, and jumping down throats at perceived bigotry which relies on heavy assumptions just lessens the power of the accusation later when it might actually have some weight to it.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Yes it is unusual. If it were usual it wouldn't be in the newspapers.

    I didn't post it about a heterosexual couple because the story I read wasn't about a heterosexual couple.

    It's not actually in the papers. It is on a gay lifestyle website that celebrates how people can be together if they feel a bond and will overcome broken laws as much as they can.

    Unfortunately I don't subscribe or visit any gay lifestyle websites, so I'll leave the reposts to you. And continue to laugh that you seem obsessed with a lifestyle that you and the rest of Kipperdom appears to detest.
    Actually it is in the papers, I chose to post the link from a gay lifestyle site to prevent hissy fits from the likes of you

    Didn't work though

    I neither detest gay lifestyle nor am I obsessed by it. I just thought it was an interesting story.

    You are a complete idiot
  • Options
    foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    kle4 said:

    Got to stick up for isam on this one - I saw that story and thought it notable because a couple had split up over a guy and now it was a three person relationship. Maybe it's not so uncommon as to be astonishing, but it is not exactly everyday either, or else it wouldn't be reported on at all (and in a more important measure, if it were common we'd see it depicted a lot more often than it is on TV dramas! - not that I've never seen such an arrangement depicted).

    Honestly, for all I know isam is bigoted, for all I know a lot of people on here are, but nothing said on this issue was evidence of that. People say incontestably bigoted and offensive things all the time, and jumping down throats at perceived bigotry which relies on heavy assumptions just lessens the power of the accusation later when it might actually have some weight to it.

    It is a curious story. If Gay marriages and polygamy, why not more exotic combinations?

    For all his kipperdom, I cannot recall a homophobic remark by isam. I think the problem lies with the accuser.
  • Options
    This person seems fairly unimpressed by the BBC QT panel
    Tom Delargy ‏@derekrootboy 17 mins17 minutes ago

    Simon Schama? #TORY
    Rod Liddle? #TORY
    Amber Rudd? #TORY
    Roger Helmer? #TORY
    Louise Haigh? #WritesDavidCameronaBlankCheque? :(
    #bbcqt
    #CRAP
  • Options
    Y0kelY0kel Posts: 2,307
    Syria: Some things don't change.

    One of the oddest reports out of Syria is the suggestion that Cuban regulars have turned up to man Syrian tanks. Perhaps Cuba's role as proxy forces for the Russians hasn't changed since the Cold War. You wonder whats in it for them these days.

    The Israelis appear to have sent their response to the increased presence of various 3rd parties in Syria. They launched airstrikes into Syria, the first since Russian stepped in.
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    :smiley:

    This person seems fairly unimpressed by the BBC QT panel
    Tom Delargy ‏@derekrootboy 17 mins17 minutes ago

    Simon Schama? #TORY
    Rod Liddle? #TORY
    Amber Rudd? #TORY
    Roger Helmer? #TORY
    Louise Haigh? #WritesDavidCameronaBlankCheque? :(
    #bbcqt
    #CRAP

  • Options
    flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903

    isam said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    Fit not fitted :neutral:
    Homophobic if you ask me.. .. as if it hasn't happened before or with other couples of different orientations

    Live and let live as long as its behind closed doors.
    I agree with you. I cannot put myself into the mindset of anyone who is either gay or bisexual nor heterosexual who might want to live is some intimate threesome . But I for one would not take isams protestations at face value.
    Whether I agree with the choices of the threesome, irrespective of their orientation is a different matter. And unlike Dair I would not write off the institution of marriage.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    @PBModerator

    Sort out flightpath
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108

    It is a curious story. If Gay marriages and polygamy, why not more exotic combinations?

    Because you are looking it from the wrong perspective.

    The whole problem with human sexuality is that it does not conform to what a long term economic plan has decided it should be. Sometimes people might love others of the same sex, or more than one person, or all sorts of combinations as long as they involve consent and are medically safe.

    The whole argument isn't about marriage and inheritance being equalisted, it's about abandoning this ridiculous legal framework so that everyone has some equality.
  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,266

    :smiley:

    This person seems fairly unimpressed by the BBC QT panel
    Tom Delargy ‏@derekrootboy 17 mins17 minutes ago

    Simon Schama? #TORY
    Rod Liddle? #TORY
    Amber Rudd? #TORY
    Roger Helmer? #TORY
    Louise Haigh? #WritesDavidCameronaBlankCheque? :(
    #bbcqt
    #CRAP

    I think Louise Haigh has done well. First major outing on TV. Pretty impressive, no matter whether you agree with her policies. From a betting perspective - one to watch I say.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited October 2015
    I knew Simon Schama would say something I totally disagreed with. 11 years old is the perfect age to separate people into different schools IMO. Older than that is too late and younger is too young.
  • Options
    flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903

    :smiley:

    This person seems fairly unimpressed by the BBC QT panel
    Tom Delargy ‏@derekrootboy 17 mins17 minutes ago

    Simon Schama? #TORY
    Rod Liddle? #TORY
    Amber Rudd? #TORY
    Roger Helmer? #TORY
    Louise Haigh? #WritesDavidCameronaBlankCheque? :(
    #bbcqt
    #CRAP

    Since 90 % of the PLP are Tory, and this is before you get to they MEPs, then this is going to be a regular occurrence. As is well known all the media are Tory scum, fit only to be spat on, and LDs are obviously Tories stooges, then its hard to see any other outcome. Even Ronald McDonnell had to be shown the instruments of torture before he recanted.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited October 2015
    Why do posh people have such a dim view of grammar schools?

    Maybe it's because they subconsciously (or otherwise) realise they might represent a threat to their own position and that of their children. Clever children from ordinary backgrounds treading on their territory.
  • Options
    flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903
    Dair said:

    It is a curious story. If Gay marriages and polygamy, why not more exotic combinations?

    Because you are looking it from the wrong perspective.

    The whole problem with human sexuality is that it does not conform to what a long term economic plan has decided it should be. Sometimes people might love others of the same sex, or more than one person, or all sorts of combinations as long as they involve consent and are medically safe.

    The whole argument isn't about marriage and inheritance being equalisted, it's about abandoning this ridiculous legal framework so that everyone has some equality.
    Ah, 'committment', its a bugger ain't it. No pun intended .
  • Options
    Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    YouGov on this one 51% approve,18% against https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/gxvihxoixc/SundayTimesResults_150515_Website.pdf
    AndyJS said:

    Why do posh people have such a dim view of grammar schools?

    Maybe it's because they subconsciously (or otherwise) realise they might represent a threat to their own position and that of their children. Clever children from ordinary backgrounds treading on their territory.

  • Options
    rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 58,266

    :smiley:

    This person seems fairly unimpressed by the BBC QT panel
    Tom Delargy ‏@derekrootboy 17 mins17 minutes ago

    Simon Schama? #TORY
    Rod Liddle? #TORY
    Amber Rudd? #TORY
    Roger Helmer? #TORY
    Louise Haigh? #WritesDavidCameronaBlankCheque? :(
    #bbcqt
    #CRAP

    Rod Liddle? #TORY ?

    He has just announced he has been a Lab member for 40 years.
  • Options
    HurstLlamaHurstLlama Posts: 9,098

    A reminder of this week's #bbcqt panel http://t.co/1a6oR24tvN

    Pretty pisspoor. 3 fruitcakes and two librarians. With Helmer's 'tache we have real potential for low budget viewing.
    Doc, not for the first time you have posted a moustacheist comment. I can keep silent on such rampant bigotry no longer. I protest. Posts like your last one have no place in polite society and to read one coming from a man in your position is deeply disturbing.
  • Options
    flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903

    kle4 said:

    Got to stick up for isam on this one - I saw that story and thought it notable because a couple had split up over a guy and now it was a three person relationship. Maybe it's not so uncommon as to be astonishing, but it is not exactly everyday either, or else it wouldn't be reported on at all (and in a more important measure, if it were common we'd see it depicted a lot more often than it is on TV dramas! - not that I've never seen such an arrangement depicted).

    Honestly, for all I know isam is bigoted, for all I know a lot of people on here are, but nothing said on this issue was evidence of that. People say incontestably bigoted and offensive things all the time, and jumping down throats at perceived bigotry which relies on heavy assumptions just lessens the power of the accusation later when it might actually have some weight to it.

    It is a curious story. If Gay marriages and polygamy, why not more exotic combinations?

    For all his kipperdom, I cannot recall a homophobic remark by isam. I think the problem lies with the accuser.
    Maybe, but if he has an opinion on this merely 'interesting' story then why not couch it is some sort of objectively interesting way with some sort of reasoned opinion? Why just the clip or link left wink wink tantalisingly in the air.
    If he has no opinion, then why bother us with it. Is there a betting implication, or is he auditioning for a job at Reuters?
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    @PBModerator
    Sort out flightpath
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,013
    @AndyJS

    There are two arguments against grammar schools:

    Firstly, as currently instituted, they are hideously unfair on those of us born towards the end of the school year. Around 3x as many people born in September pass the 11-plus as those born in August.

    Secondly, the data suggests (http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2013/01/28/grammar-school-myths/) that they don't do what they are supposed to do: i.e. to help bright kids from poor backgrounds achieve their potential.

    It seems the first issue could be solved by "a creeping pass mark", but the second is a bigger issue.
  • Options
    Howgate by election result (Cumbria County Council)

    Labour 436
    Conservative 304
    UKIP 176
    Two spoilt papers
    Turnout 20.3%
    8% Swing from Labour to Conservative compared with 2013

    Incidentally I mentioned to Gillian Troughton that a "friend of a friend" had described her on this site as a bit Corbyny. She laughed - and not in a way that suggested she agreed with the description.
  • Options
    FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,047

    This person seems fairly unimpressed by the BBC QT panel
    Tom Delargy ‏@derekrootboy 17 mins17 minutes ago

    Simon Schama? #TORY
    Rod Liddle? #TORY
    Amber Rudd? #TORY
    Roger Helmer? #TORY
    Louise Haigh? #WritesDavidCameronaBlankCheque? :(
    #bbcqt
    #CRAP

    Why has poor David Dimbleby been left out?

    Not just any Tory, a Bullingdon Tory.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,013
    AndyJS said:

    Why do posh people have such a dim view of grammar schools?

    Maybe it's because they subconsciously (or otherwise) realise they might represent a threat to their own position and that of their children. Clever children from ordinary backgrounds treading on their territory.

    Except that what happens in most grammar school areas is that middle class parents celebrate their luck in not having to pay school fees, while kids of poorer families (who can't afford to have their kids tutored) lose out.

    I live close to the excellent Henrietta Barnett school, and I hope my daughter gets in on the 11-plus to get there. In fact, I suspect all the girls from my daughter's incredibly expensive prep school will be applying there.

    But just 23 kids in the whole of Henrietta Barnett get free school meals. That's staggeringly low - an average of less than one per class! (In fact, I suspect the private North London Collegiate takes more poor kids through its scholarship programmes.)

    Everyone likes the idea of grammar schools. I like the idea of grammar schools. But the data and the evidence is clear: they do not promote social mobility,
  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,610
    rcs1000 said:

    @AndyJS

    There are two arguments against grammar schools:

    Firstly, as currently instituted, they are hideously unfair on those of us born towards the end of the school year. Around 3x as many people born in September pass the 11-plus as those born in August.

    Secondly, the data suggests (http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2013/01/28/grammar-school-myths/) that they don't do what they are supposed to do: i.e. to help bright kids from poor backgrounds achieve their potential.

    It seems the first issue could be solved by "a creeping pass mark", but the second is a bigger issue.

    I must be the exception, born in August and from a poor background. Then again, the test for my school was aptitude based rather than skills so it didn't matter how well one revised for it or how old one was.
  • Options
    AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    If one of grammar schools or private schools had to be abolished, it should have been private schools.
  • Options
    rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 54,013
    MaxPB said:

    rcs1000 said:

    @AndyJS

    There are two arguments against grammar schools:

    Firstly, as currently instituted, they are hideously unfair on those of us born towards the end of the school year. Around 3x as many people born in September pass the 11-plus as those born in August.

    Secondly, the data suggests (http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2013/01/28/grammar-school-myths/) that they don't do what they are supposed to do: i.e. to help bright kids from poor backgrounds achieve their potential.

    It seems the first issue could be solved by "a creeping pass mark", but the second is a bigger issue.

    I must be the exception, born in August and from a poor background. Then again, the test for my school was aptitude based rather than skills so it didn't matter how well one revised for it or how old one was.
    As a fellow August baby (and I was premature too...), I share your pain.

    But the data is the data: being born in September rather than August dramatically improves your chances of making it to a grammar school.
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108

    kle4 said:

    Got to stick up for isam on this one - I saw that story and thought it notable because a couple had split up over a guy and now it was a three person relationship. Maybe it's not so uncommon as to be astonishing, but it is not exactly everyday either, or else it wouldn't be reported on at all (and in a more important measure, if it were common we'd see it depicted a lot more often than it is on TV dramas! - not that I've never seen such an arrangement depicted).

    Honestly, for all I know isam is bigoted, for all I know a lot of people on here are, but nothing said on this issue was evidence of that. People say incontestably bigoted and offensive things all the time, and jumping down throats at perceived bigotry which relies on heavy assumptions just lessens the power of the accusation later when it might actually have some weight to it.

    It is a curious story. If Gay marriages and polygamy, why not more exotic combinations?

    For all his kipperdom, I cannot recall a homophobic remark by isam. I think the problem lies with the accuser.
    Maybe, but if he has an opinion on this merely 'interesting' story then why not couch it is some sort of objectively interesting way with some sort of reasoned opinion? Why just the clip or link left wink wink tantalisingly in the air.
    If he has no opinion, then why bother us with it. Is there a betting implication, or is he auditioning for a job at Reuters?
    He does it because he is a bigot and thinks homosexuality is somehow unacceptable and that this story backs up his demented bias.

    The bizarre part (or as some psychologist might argue the revealing part) is that he took it from gay website.
  • Options

    This person seems fairly unimpressed by the BBC QT panel
    Tom Delargy ‏@derekrootboy 17 mins17 minutes ago

    Simon Schama? #TORY
    Rod Liddle? #TORY
    Amber Rudd? #TORY
    Roger Helmer? #TORY
    Louise Haigh? #WritesDavidCameronaBlankCheque? :(
    #bbcqt
    #CRAP

    Why has poor David Dimbleby been left out?

    Not just any Tory, a Bullingdon Tory.
    I guess the poor tweeter needed a lie down.

  • Options
    MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 37,610
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    Why do posh people have such a dim view of grammar schools?

    Maybe it's because they subconsciously (or otherwise) realise they might represent a threat to their own position and that of their children. Clever children from ordinary backgrounds treading on their territory.

    Except that what happens in most grammar school areas is that middle class parents celebrate their luck in not having to pay school fees, while kids of poorer families (who can't afford to have their kids tutored) lose out.

    I live close to the excellent Henrietta Barnett school, and I hope my daughter gets in on the 11-plus to get there. In fact, I suspect all the girls from my daughter's incredibly expensive prep school will be applying there.

    But just 23 kids in the whole of Henrietta Barnett get free school meals. That's staggeringly low - an average of less than one per class! (In fact, I suspect the private North London Collegiate takes more poor kids through its scholarship programmes.)

    Everyone likes the idea of grammar schools. I like the idea of grammar schools. But the data and the evidence is clear: they do not promote social mobility,
    Aptitude testing is the key, really hard aptitude tests that can't be studied for. A proper IQ test. The middle classes can squirm all they like but it is the only way to level the playing field.

    My sister went to Henrietta Barnett btw!
  • Options
    notme said:

    Interesting one for me tonight, I know Gill Troughton in Cumbria via friends. She is quite a Corbynite.



    I'm sure she is, with her seat and Jamie Reed's seat disappearing in boundary review, with what results they'll be fighting over. Jamie Reed had a twitter feed about as bad as Liz's Kendall... Being a Corbynite in such a scenario is a smart move.
    I think you may be getting Gillian Troughton, the Labour candidate in the county council by-election today, mixed up with Sue Hayman, the former councillor for the division who was elected MP for Workington in May and whose consequent resignation from the County Council caused the by-election. Sue Hayman accepted a position as a whip under Corbyn, very possibly on the logic described above. As I mentioned in a previous post, I asked Gillian at the count if she agreed with the description of herself as a Corbynite and she laughed in a manner which I took as a "no."
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    rcs1000 said:

    AndyJS said:

    Why do posh people have such a dim view of grammar schools?

    Maybe it's because they subconsciously (or otherwise) realise they might represent a threat to their own position and that of their children. Clever children from ordinary backgrounds treading on their territory.

    Except that what happens in most grammar school areas is that middle class parents celebrate their luck in not having to pay school fees, while kids of poorer families (who can't afford to have their kids tutored) lose out.

    I live close to the excellent Henrietta Barnett school, and I hope my daughter gets in on the 11-plus to get there. In fact, I suspect all the girls from my daughter's incredibly expensive prep school will be applying there.

    But just 23 kids in the whole of Henrietta Barnett get free school meals. That's staggeringly low - an average of less than one per class! (In fact, I suspect the private North London Collegiate takes more poor kids through its scholarship programmes.)

    Everyone likes the idea of grammar schools. I like the idea of grammar schools. But the data and the evidence is clear: they do not promote social mobility,
    They used to when there some in poor areas... Of course if everyone is paying for private tutoring just so they can get their child into one of the few remaining grammars there aren't going to be many free school meal kids there. The fact is that my mum and dad came from council estates but got top educations because there were grammar schools in Dagenham and Romford... Now there aren't any Grammar schools in the borough
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,980

    Howgate by election result (Cumbria County Council)

    Labour 436
    Conservative 304
    UKIP 176
    Two spoilt papers
    Turnout 20.3%
    8% Swing from Labour to Conservative compared with 2013

    Incidentally I mentioned to Gillian Troughton that a "friend of a friend" had described her on this site as a bit Corbyny. She laughed - and not in a way that suggested she agreed with the description.

    Quite right. The correct terminology is Corbynista.
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108

    Howgate by election result (Cumbria County Council)

    Labour 436
    Conservative 304
    UKIP 176
    Two spoilt papers
    Turnout 20.3%
    8% Swing from Labour to Conservative compared with 2013

    Incidentally I mentioned to Gillian Troughton that a "friend of a friend" had described her on this site as a bit Corbyny. She laughed - and not in a way that suggested she agreed with the description.

    The Liberals most secure seat (and possibly their only one after 202) is in Cumbria. Where are the Liberal heartlands now if they can't even stand a candidate.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,980
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Just think of how much disposable income the "couple" has!
  • Options
    notmenotme Posts: 3,293
    RobD said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Just think of how much disposable income the "couple" has!
    It might be the only way to get a starter home mortgage in london.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    Dair said:

    kle4 said:

    Got to stick up for isam on this one - I saw that story and thought it notable because a couple had split up over a guy and now it was a three person relationship. Maybe it's not so uncommon as to be astonishing, but it is not exactly everyday either, or else it wouldn't be reported on at all (and in a more important measure, if it were common we'd see it depicted a lot more often than it is on TV dramas! - not that I've never seen such an arrangement depicted).

    Honestly, for all I know isam is bigoted, for all I know a lot of people on here are, but nothing said on this issue was evidence of that. People say incontestably bigoted and offensive things all the time, and jumping down throats at perceived bigotry which relies on heavy assumptions just lessens the power of the accusation later when it might actually have some weight to it.

    It is a curious story. If Gay marriages and polygamy, why not more exotic combinations?

    For all his kipperdom, I cannot recall a homophobic remark by isam. I think the problem lies with the accuser.
    Maybe, but if he has an opinion on this merely 'interesting' story then why not couch it is some sort of objectively interesting way with some sort of reasoned opinion? Why just the clip or link left wink wink tantalisingly in the air.
    If he has no opinion, then why bother us with it. Is there a betting implication, or is he auditioning for a job at Reuters?
    He does it because he is a bigot and thinks homosexuality is somehow unacceptable and that this story backs up his demented bias.

    The bizarre part (or as some psychologist might argue the revealing part) is that he took it from gay website.
    You are a parody... Is there any stereotypical argument you don't use?

    I don't think homosexuality is unacceptable in the slightest, and would happily read a gay website without thinking it was anything to remark upon. The story was in the daily mail but I thought people like you would fall into the obvious boring predictable trap of shooting the messenger, so I linked to it from a gay website

    Sharpen up
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108
    MaxPB said:

    rcs1000 said:

    @AndyJS

    There are two arguments against grammar schools:

    Firstly, as currently instituted, they are hideously unfair on those of us born towards the end of the school year. Around 3x as many people born in September pass the 11-plus as those born in August.

    Secondly, the data suggests (http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2013/01/28/grammar-school-myths/) that they don't do what they are supposed to do: i.e. to help bright kids from poor backgrounds achieve their potential.

    It seems the first issue could be solved by "a creeping pass mark", but the second is a bigger issue.

    I must be the exception, born in August and from a poor background. Then again, the test for my school was aptitude based rather than skills so it didn't matter how well one revised for it or how old one was.
    IQ test are fairly easy to train for.
  • Options
    notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    notme said:

    Interesting one for me tonight, I know Gill Troughton in Cumbria via friends. She is quite a Corbynite.



    I'm sure she is, with her seat and Jamie Reed's seat disappearing in boundary review, with what results they'll be fighting over. Jamie Reed had a twitter feed about as bad as Liz's Kendall... Being a Corbynite in such a scenario is a smart move.
    I think you may be getting Gillian Troughton, the Labour candidate in the county council by-election today, mixed up with Sue Hayman, the former councillor for the division who was elected MP for Workington in May and whose consequent resignation from the County Council caused the by-election. Sue Hayman accepted a position as a whip under Corbyn, very possibly on the logic described above. As I mentioned in a previous post, I asked Gillian at the count if she agreed with the description of herself as a Corbynite and she laughed in a manner which I took as a "no."
    Yes, that is exactly what i was doing.... Oops.
  • Options
    isamisam Posts: 40,933
    Dair said:

    MaxPB said:

    rcs1000 said:

    @AndyJS

    There are two arguments against grammar schools:

    Firstly, as currently instituted, they are hideously unfair on those of us born towards the end of the school year. Around 3x as many people born in September pass the 11-plus as those born in August.

    Secondly, the data suggests (http://blogs.ft.com/ftdata/2013/01/28/grammar-school-myths/) that they don't do what they are supposed to do: i.e. to help bright kids from poor backgrounds achieve their potential.

    It seems the first issue could be solved by "a creeping pass mark", but the second is a bigger issue.

    I must be the exception, born in August and from a poor background. Then again, the test for my school was aptitude based rather than skills so it didn't matter how well one revised for it or how old one was.
    IQ test are fairly easy to train for.
    You'd fail
  • Options
    Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    I don't know if you can watch it over there, but Donald Trump will host Saturday Night Live on Nov 7th.
  • Options
    DairDair Posts: 6,108
    RobD said:

    Dair said:

    isam said:

    Gay male couple divorce after meeting guy they both fancy... Now living as a threesome and plan to start a family

    If only there were a saying that fitted...

    http://www.queerty.com/couple-divorces-after-one-year-to-invite-third-man-into-their-relationship-20151015?utm_source=VancityBuzz&utm_medium=twitter&utm_campaign=Feed:+queerty2+(Queerty)

    You should explain what the problem with this is.

    It is not uncommon amongst heterosexual couples to live in tri-relationships. People make choices. Deal with it.
    Just think of how much disposable income the "couple" has!
    To be honest, a tri-gay couple will likely have a lot less than Mick Philpott thanks to New Labours incentivisation of "all the kids your concubines can bear".
Sign In or Register to comment.