Our recent polling of Muslims in areas with a high concentration of British Muslims - which included Manchester Rusholme - showed almost half would vote tactically for a Green candidate to keep out Labour.
Manchester MP at centre of Burnham speculation denies plans to stand down By Faye Brown, political reporter Afzal Khan, the MP for Manchester Rusholme, has told Sky News he has not got plans to give up his seat for Andy Bunrham. Mr Khan yesterday told Sky News the speculation around his seat was a "fake rumour". He's reiterated the denial tonight, after reports swirled that he was willing to stand down if Wes Streeting mounts a leadership challenge. "I am not giving [up] my seat" he told me this evening.
Prof David Bailey @dgbailey Apparently @brumlabour can’t appoint its Leader in Birmingham, because it has to await approval from Starmer or Steve Reed! The last centrally annointed leader hardly worked out well. Utter disregard for local members & elected councillors again.
And how does that work regarding possible rainbow coalition with Greens, Lib Dens & Indies to run @BhamCityCouncil ? Birmingham is now hanging around waiting for central Labour Party to distract its attention from leadership struggles to colonially appoint a Brum labour leader.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a party led by a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a party led by a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
Is that because all the hopefuls are promising it to him if he doesn't run? Can't see why he'd want it, either stay at Energy and see it through or be PM and appoint someone to see it through.
Ed Miliband has an Oxford PPE and LSE MSc in economics (the same academic path as Rachel Reeves and Yvette Cooper, coincidentally) and earned his political spurs under Brown as Chancellor and de facto PM i/c domestic affairs, while Blair concentrated on foreign policy. It seems pretty obvious why he'd want the Treasury job. Ed has already been leader of the party and seen what a hostile media can do to himself and his family, and he has no discernible interest in foreign policy, so you can see why he'd not want the top job.
This has been over for Starmer since Mandelson. Last Thursday was a punishment beating. Evisceration. And the reaction from the party was clear. That Keith still thinks he can lead - for 10 years!!! - is his undoing.
A dignified announcement. A measured timetable. A managed contest. And then a new leader for the party to unite behind.
Instead we get this. He’s done. And the longer this drags on the more likely they are done.
As this turns to shit I can only say this; Starmer could have prevented all this
How could he have?
Accepted the verdict of last Thursday and laid out a timetable for his resignation
Going back two years he could have actually had a clear plan for government when it was so obvious Labour were going to win; and then implemented that plan.
This has been over for Starmer since Mandelson. Last Thursday was a punishment beating. Evisceration. And the reaction from the party was clear. That Keith still thinks he can lead - for 10 years!!! - is his undoing.
A dignified announcement. A measured timetable. A managed contest. And then a new leader for the party to unite behind.
Instead we get this. He’s done. And the longer this drags on the more likely they are done.
Manchester MP at centre of Burnham speculation denies plans to stand down By Faye Brown, political reporter Afzal Khan, the MP for Manchester Rusholme, has told Sky News he has not got plans to give up his seat for Andy Bunrham. Mr Khan yesterday told Sky News the speculation around his seat was a "fake rumour". He's reiterated the denial tonight, after reports swirled that he was willing to stand down if Wes Streeting mounts a leadership challenge. "I am not giving [up] my seat" he told me this evening.
Tony Diver @Tony_Diver · 28m Wes Streeting’s team is asking MPs to support his leadership bid to trigger a contest, but arguing that they can transfer their vote to another candidate after a race begins.
Suggests the Streeting team is struggling to get to 81 nominations tonight.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a party led by a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
Voting for the Greens in this seat, if there is a by-election, doesn't give the Greens any chance of implementing any policies. But it could stop Burnham from being elected as an MP, which would be very amusing and damage Labour's credibility, making a Labour defeat at the next general election more likely.
By-elections are different to general elections. They're about sending a message, not choosing a government.
Manchester MP at centre of Burnham speculation denies plans to stand down By Faye Brown, political reporter Afzal Khan, the MP for Manchester Rusholme, has told Sky News he has not got plans to give up his seat for Andy Bunrham. Mr Khan yesterday told Sky News the speculation around his seat was a "fake rumour". He's reiterated the denial tonight, after reports swirled that he was willing to stand down if Wes Streeting mounts a leadership challenge. "I am not giving [up] my seat" he told me this evening.
This has been over for Starmer since Mandelson. Last Thursday was a punishment beating. Evisceration. And the reaction from the party was clear. That Keith still thinks he can lead - for 10 years!!! - is his undoing.
A dignified announcement. A measured timetable. A managed contest. And then a new leader for the party to unite behind.
Instead we get this. He’s done. And the longer this drags on the more likely they are done.
Then we get Farage. And we are all done.
The mendacious megabung chancer is not going to be PM.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a party led by a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
Voting for the Greens in this seat, if there is a by-election, doesn't give the Greens any chance of implementing any policies. But it could stop Burnham from being elected as an MP, which would be very amusing and damage Labour's credibility, making a Labour defeat at the next general election more likely.
By-elections are different to general elections. They're about sending a message, not choosing a government.
No, Polanski would get a huge boost from the Greens beating Burnham in a by election, the Greens would almost certainly surge to second in polls and become the main alternative to Reform with their socialist, woke agenda. It would be an absolute disaster for the country far worse than just allowing Burnham to win a by election
Manchester MP at centre of Burnham speculation denies plans to stand down By Faye Brown, political reporter Afzal Khan, the MP for Manchester Rusholme, has told Sky News he has not got plans to give up his seat for Andy Bunrham. Mr Khan yesterday told Sky News the speculation around his seat was a "fake rumour". He's reiterated the denial tonight, after reports swirled that he was willing to stand down if Wes Streeting mounts a leadership challenge. "I am not giving [up] my seat" he told me this evening.
Tony Diver @Tony_Diver · 28m Wes Streeting’s team is asking MPs to support his leadership bid to trigger a contest, but arguing that they can transfer their vote to another candidate after a race begins.
Suggests the Streeting team is struggling to get to 81 nominations tonight.
Or they’ve got the nominations and want to declare with a surprisingly big number to create momentum.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a party led by a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
Someone who is "angry" with Labour
Most voters are angry with Starmer not Burnham, Burnham polls better than any other senior politician
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Andy Burnham has told Labour MPs they should hold the line and that he has options to return to parliament after several seats identified by his allies failed to materialise.
Two seats seem possible - Afzal Khan’s in Rusholme - or Jeff Smith in Withington.
Labour really do want to have their Liz Truss moment don't they. I'm quite lucky that my mortgage runs until 2028, anyone renewing this year or next will be heading for a pretty big increase in their monthly payments.
If they pick Ed Miliband we could be risking the whole economy.
Labour really do want to have their Liz Truss moment don't they. I'm quite lucky that my mortgage runs until 2028, anyone renewing this year or next will be heading for a pretty big increase in their monthly payments.
If they pick Ed Miliband we could be risking the whole economy.
Rayner is more likely to be picked by members than Miliband if she gets the nominations
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a party led by a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
Voting for the Greens in this seat, if there is a by-election, doesn't give the Greens any chance of implementing any policies. But it could stop Burnham from being elected as an MP, which would be very amusing and damage Labour's credibility, making a Labour defeat at the next general election more likely.
By-elections are different to general elections. They're about sending a message, not choosing a government.
No, Polanski would get a huge boost from the Greens beating Burnham in a by election, the Greens would almost certainly surge to second in polls and become the main alternative to Reform with their socialist, woke agenda. It would be an absolute disaster for the country far worse than just allowing Burnham to win a by election
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Surely HY is advocating tactical voting - just not to your taste?
JUST IN: House Democrats secured the 218 signatures needed to bypass Speaker Mike Johnson and force a vote on Russia sanctions and Ukraine aid after Rep. Kevin Kiley joined Republicans Brian Fitzpatrick and Don Bacon in backing the petitio
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
Labour really do want to have their Liz Truss moment don't they. I'm quite lucky that my mortgage runs until 2028, anyone renewing this year or next will be heading for a pretty big increase in their monthly payments.
If they pick Ed Miliband we could be risking the whole economy.
Choosing a new Prime Minister mid-term is an absurd power to hand to such a small, unrepresentative group of freaks, whatever the colour of their rosette.
MPs are accountable to the whole electorate, and 2019-24 shows that the number of utterly safe seats is large, but not crazy. Party members are accountable to nobody but themselves.
Wes Streeting’s team is asking MPs to support his leadership bid to trigger a contest, but arguing that they can transfer their vote to another candidate after a race begins.
Suggests the Streeting team is struggling to get to 81 nominations tonight.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
I wouldn't, I would vote Reform or even Restore over the Greens though I understand your logic.
A Tory voting Green over Reform is just about understandable, a Tory voting Green over Tory to beat Burnham is inexcusable
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Especially as he tactically voted for Plaid
No I didn't, as I said I would have voted for Labour or the LDs as my last 2 votes had they stood candidates not Plaid
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
Now you're just being silly.
No, if you vote for a Marxist republican you have no right saying you are a Conservative
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
Utter and complete nonsense
You need to calm down and understand politics better
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
You cannot call yourself a Conservative because you voted for a party that wants to break up the UK.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
Utter and complete nonsense
You need to calm down and understand politics better
I do, you are the one advocating voting for a Marxist
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Especially as he tactically voted for Plaid
No I didn't, as I said I would have voted for Labour or the LDs as my last 2 votes had they stood candidates not Plaid
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Surely HY is advocating tactical voting - just not to your taste?
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
You cannot call yourself a Conservative because you voted for a party that wants to break up the UK.
I voted for 4 Tories on a 6 vote ballot and 2 Plaid as they were the only other party who bothered to stand so still technically I mainly voted for unionist candidates
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
You don't seriously believe Reform/Restore would start deporting people who are legally in the UK?
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
Now you're just being silly.
No, if you vote for a Marxist republican you have no right saying you are a Conservative
You say he's a Marxist republican. Are you allowed to dictate the judgement to every Conservative leaning voter? No, thankfully you are not.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
Utter and complete nonsense
You need to calm down and understand politics better
I do, you are the one advocating voting for a Marxist
"Those are my principles, and if you don't like them, well, I have others."
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
Starmer is crap at politics. But he's very good at Labour internal politics.
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
Starmer is crap at politics. But he's very good at Labour internal politics.
He was in my view a good LOTO and is a good Labour leader. But he’s a terrible PM.
Labour really do want to have their Liz Truss moment don't they. I'm quite lucky that my mortgage runs until 2028, anyone renewing this year or next will be heading for a pretty big increase in their monthly payments.
If they pick Ed Miliband we could be risking the whole economy.
Careful - the 'chaos with Ed Miliband' line might have worked last time, but best not to remind voters what happens when you don't choose chaos with Ed
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Surely HY is advocating tactical voting - just not to your taste?
No - quite the opposite
No, he said "I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory". That is, he would vote tactically to block the Green candidate. The implication is that in Rusholme for example he would vote Labour to stop the Greens.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
You don't seriously believe Reform/Restore would start deporting people who are legally in the UK?
That's what they are saying.
I am judging them by their own words.
The so-called ‘Boriswave’ in particular must be undone
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
You don't seriously believe Reform/Restore would start deporting people who are legally in the UK?
Yes they would. Slippery slope and all that. I’m already looking at options in case Farage and his blackshirts win. In that way I am fortunate - not everyone will be that lucky.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Surely HY is advocating tactical voting - just not to your taste?
No - quite the opposite
No, he said "I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory". That is, he would vote tactically to block the Green candidate. The implication is that in Rusholme for example he would vote Labour to stop the Greens.
And let Burnham win where some would not want that result
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
You don't seriously believe Reform/Restore would start deporting people who are legally in the UK?
Well, they plan to make legal migrants with ILR illegal first by revoking their ILR, then deport them.
I have advised some of my colleagues to get cracking on their passport ASAP. Even that might not be enough for Lowe when he comes round with his colour chart.
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
Except, the voters will go "Oh FFS..." And Labour will be on 9%.
All the "is Miliband popular/competent/acceptable after losing 11 years ago" is missing the most crucial point: that the most dramatically satisfying ending is that the guy who lost the election after which everything went wrong comes back and fixes it all. Ask Chekov. Ask Aristotle
All the "is Miliband popular/competent/acceptable after losing 11 years ago" is missing the most crucial point: that the most dramatically satisfying ending is that the guy who lost the election after which everything went wrong comes back and fixes it all. Ask Chekov. Ask Aristotle
As someone who passionately campaigned for Cameron, you can’t possibly believe that, can you?
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Surely HY is advocating tactical voting - just not to your taste?
No - quite the opposite
No, he said "I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory". That is, he would vote tactically to block the Green candidate. The implication is that in Rusholme for example he would vote Labour to stop the Greens.
And let Burnham win where some would not want that result
Burnham has a -15% rating with Tory voters and -30% with Reform voters, Polanski has a -49% rating with Tories and a massive -62% rating with Reform voters
All the "is Miliband popular/competent/acceptable after losing 11 years ago" is missing the most crucial point: that the most dramatically satisfying ending is that the guy who lost the election after which everything went wrong comes back and fixes it all. Ask Chekov. Ask Aristotle
Can we ask Chekov and Aristotle: "Er - fixes it HOW?"
The answer to that seems to be as elusive for the alterntives as it has been for Starmer.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
You don't seriously believe Reform/Restore would start deporting people who are legally in the UK?
Many Germans in the 1930s did not believe the Nazis would treat Jews as badly as their rhetoric suggested.
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Surely HY is advocating tactical voting - just not to your taste?
No - quite the opposite
No, he said "I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory". That is, he would vote tactically to block the Green candidate. The implication is that in Rusholme for example he would vote Labour to stop the Greens.
And let Burnham win where some would not want that result
Yes that's my point. Tactical voting can work against our preferred outcome as well as for it.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Surely HY is advocating tactical voting - just not to your taste?
No - quite the opposite
No, he said "I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory". That is, he would vote tactically to block the Green candidate. The implication is that in Rusholme for example he would vote Labour to stop the Greens.
And let Burnham win where some would not want that result
Burnham has a -15% rating with Tory voters and -30% with Reform voters, Polanski has a -49% rating with Tories and a massive -62% rating with Reform voters
That shows that 7%of Con voters and 4% of Reform voters have a favourable opinion of Polanski. A massive 37% of Con voters and 30% or Reform voters did not express an opinion.
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
Stop insulting conservatives who see tactical voting as legitimate
Any Conservative considering voting for the Polanski led Greens should certainly be expelled from the party if a member and should not be allowed to call themselves a Conservative if just a voter. As clearly anyone voting for Polanski and his awful party has not a Tory bone in his body
You cannot call yourself a Conservative because you voted for a party that wants to break up the UK.
I voted for 4 Tories on a 6 vote ballot and 2 Plaid as they were the only other party who bothered to stand so still technically I mainly voted for unionist candidates
As a recent convert to your Welsh nationalist cause (I did vote for them once before) it is quite a liberating experience.
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
And it would start the End Times for his party
He would be dooming them to complete defeat
Or more likely another leadership challenge after the 2027 locals.
Wes Streeting’s team is asking MPs to support his leadership bid to trigger a contest, but arguing that they can transfer their vote to another candidate after a race begins.
Suggests the Streeting team is struggling to get to 81 nominations tonight.
All the "is Miliband popular/competent/acceptable after losing 11 years ago" is missing the most crucial point: that the most dramatically satisfying ending is that the guy who lost the election after which everything went wrong comes back and fixes it all. Ask Chekov. Ask Aristotle
Would be amusing to see either Chekov or Aristotle struggle with a bacon roll in todays media, or their wise sayings laid out on an 'Ed stone'
I can see some Reform and Tory supporters in Rusholme voting for the Greens since neither of those parties stands a chance of winning.
No Tory is ever going to vote for the Marxist Polanski and his party and no Reform vote will vote for uber woke Polanski's party either
You really don’t understand the voters, do you?
I know Tory and Reform voters despise the Polanski Greens far more than they hate Burnham
A few in your circle maybe but that is anecdotal
What Tory or Reform voter is going to vote for a far left Marxist Republican who wants massive tax hikes, unlimited spending, unlimited immigration and is uber woke and wants to rejoin the EU?
You are just silly
Tactical voting is very real
I would vote for any party over the far left Greens as would any sane Tory
I'd vote Green over Reform/Restore on the grounds that the Greens are going to deport me like the Re lot.
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
You don't seriously believe Reform/Restore would start deporting people who are legally in the UK?
Lol the naivety/indifference of white British Reformists is off the scale.
Comments
From Sky News website, posted 5 minutes ago:
Manchester MP at centre of Burnham speculation denies plans to stand down
By Faye Brown, political reporter
Afzal Khan, the MP for Manchester Rusholme, has told Sky News he has not got plans to give up his seat for Andy Bunrham.
Mr Khan yesterday told Sky News the speculation around his seat was a "fake rumour".
He's reiterated the denial tonight, after reports swirled that he was willing to stand down if Wes Streeting mounts a leadership challenge.
"I am not giving [up] my seat" he told me this evening.
https://news.sky.com/story/starmer-latest-burnham-streeting-rayner-leadership-quit-cabinet-resign-kings-speech-local-elections-12593360
Prof David Bailey
@dgbailey
Apparently
@brumlabour
can’t appoint its Leader in Birmingham, because it has to await approval from Starmer or Steve Reed! The last centrally annointed leader hardly worked out well. Utter disregard for local members & elected councillors again.
Prof David Bailey
@dgbailey
And how does that work regarding possible rainbow coalition with Greens, Lib Dens & Indies to run
@BhamCityCouncil ? Birmingham is now hanging around waiting for central Labour Party to distract its attention from leadership struggles to colonially appoint a Brum labour leader.
https://x.com/dgbailey/status/2054493850836566395
Tactical voting is very real
A dignified announcement. A measured timetable. A managed contest. And then a new leader for the party to unite behind.
Instead we get this. He’s done. And the longer this drags on the more likely they are done.
Then we get Farage. And we are all done.
A dignified announcement. A measured timetable. A managed contest. And then a new leader for the party to unite behind.
Instead we get this. He’s done. And the longer this drags on the more likely they are done.
Then we get Farage. And we are all done.
Tony Diver
@Tony_Diver
·
28m
Wes Streeting’s team is asking MPs to support his leadership bid to trigger a contest, but arguing that they can transfer their vote to another candidate after a race begins.
Suggests the Streeting team is struggling to get to 81 nominations tonight.
By-elections are different to general elections. They're about sending a message, not choosing a government.
As an act of mayoral solidarity, perhaps Sadiq could post one of these to Andy.
https://bsky.app/profile/politicanimal.bsky.social/post/3mlqr4v27nk27
Are Andy and Wes both bluffing on fairly weak hands?
She is noticeably worse when she has to be a bit more adaptive and think on her feet. I still think her PMQs game is far below what it could be.
(Image quota, not seat)
Andy Burnham has told Labour MPs they should hold the line and that he has options to return to parliament after several seats identified by his allies failed to materialise.
Two seats seem possible - Afzal Khan’s in Rusholme - or Jeff Smith in Withington.
@cjterry.bsky.social
"Seem possible" is code for "he still doesn't have a seat"
If they pick Ed Miliband we could be risking the whole economy.
https://x.com/RpsAgainstTrump/status/2054641009997283523
I'm sane by the way, my mother had me tested.
MPs are accountable to the whole electorate, and 2019-24 shows that the number of utterly safe seats is large, but not crazy. Party members are accountable to nobody but themselves.
Wes Streeting’s team is asking MPs to support his leadership bid to trigger a contest, but arguing that they can transfer their vote to another candidate after a race begins.
Suggests the Streeting team is struggling to get to 81 nominations tonight.
@PronouncedAlva
A note to Labour MPs: you can only transfer your nomination if the candidate withdraws
A Tory voting Green over Reform is just about understandable, a Tory voting Green over Tory to beat Burnham is inexcusable
You need to calm down and understand politics better
Streeting stinks
The press don't like
What Miliband thinks
Rayner's taxes are awful;
Nooses give;
Guns aren’t lawful;
He might as well live.
(I'd apologise to Dorothy Parker, but that might make things worse.)
Should Starmer decide to run against Streeting – plus an alternative candidate from the left like Rayner or Miliband – the prime minister would have a major advantage because of Labour’s voting system, which is preferential voting.
MPs say they are deeply concerned that because Starmer would be likely to collect most second preferences.
In a three-way contest he could even come second and still remain leader and prime minister.
It would be great for Scottish Football for Hearts to win.
But he's very good at Labour internal politics.
I predict both to be the case.
I am judging them by their own words.
The so-called ‘Boriswave’ in particular must be undone
https://www.restorebritain.org.uk/immigration_border_control
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2026/feb/22/reform-uk-ice-style-agency-end-leave-to-remain-zia-yusuf
All to play for, Celtic favourites no doubt
I have advised some of my colleagues to get cracking on their passport ASAP. Even that might not be enough for Lowe when he comes round with his colour chart.
All the "is Miliband popular/competent/acceptable after losing 11 years ago" is missing the most crucial point: that the most dramatically satisfying ending is that the guy who lost the election after which everything went wrong comes back and fixes it all. Ask Chekov. Ask Aristotle
https://ygo-assets-websites-editorial-emea.yougov.net/documents/Internal_Favourability_260421.pdf
The answer to that seems to be as elusive for the alterntives as it has been for Starmer.
Both English and Scottish premier leagues to be decided by contentious VAR calls this year?
So at least a minority of both are not averse.
He would be dooming them to complete defeat
Who would have guessed.......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Tl8NX7734rg
Burnham wins a by-election and into cabinet.
This is clearly the best option for Labour.
Lefties
Always
Bottle
Ousting
Useless
Rulers