politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Opinium has the Tories 2% ahead fir the first time since it

Trend chart from Opinium which has just recorded its first ever CON lead in its Observer polling series pic.twitter.com/o4q9cS3RlB
Comments
-
First!0
-
Squirrel down, I repeat squirrel down....0
-
I spy a Tory lead right at the start.0
-
FPT
I note that one of the old liberal MPs has recently died. Lord Mackie of Benshie became Liberal MP for Caithness and Sutherland in 1964, but was beaten by Robert Maclennan in 1966. He lived to a ripe old age of 95.0 -
Pretty clear from that chart, Tories appear to have picked up support from UKIP and Labour having some votes nicked by uptick in support for Greens....and still no sign that poor Lib Dems are getting any credit for economic good news etc.0
-
This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.0
-
Two of the last 18 polls have shown the Tories ahead.0
-
Mr. F, really? Nice for the blues but it's not a huge shift and it's only one poll.0
-
Double crossover, with the Greens overtaking the Lib Dems.
It's most noteworthy for it being the first time the Tories have led for three years with this pollster. But it is still just one poll.0 -
Sorry, I meant looking at the trend chart, not just this one poll.Morris_Dancer said:Mr. F, really? Nice for the blues but it's not a huge shift and it's only one poll.
0 -
FPT
St Valentines Day swingback massacre effect.MikeSmithson said:Tories take 2% lead with Opinium
I contended months ago that only on St Valentines day or thereabouts would the elecorate start to notice an election was imminent due to the fixed term parliament removing the "will he go to the Queen next week" element of speculation. Therefore until st valentine's day the electorate would use opinion polls to kick the government. Only after Feb 14th would they look closely at who the next PM would be, take one look at Millipede and say 'not you mate'.
0 -
Part-ELBOW before Opinium = Lab 1.5% lead
Part-ELBOW inc. Opinium = Lab 1.0% lead
Just YG/Sunday Times left...0 -
Nigel Farage's approval ratings are barely better than Ed Miliband's in this poll.0
-
The Lib Dems are not getting any credit for good economic news because they don't appear to be shouting about it.In fact they do't appear to be shouting about anything -strange behavior as they need to be strongly visible in the air war.FrancisUrquhart said:Pretty clear from that chart, Tories appear to have picked up support from UKIP and Labour having some votes nicked by uptick in support for Greens....and still no sign that poor Lib Dems are getting any credit for economic good news etc.
0 -
First Tory lead in Opinium since March 2012
Opinium Research @OpiniumResearch · 1m1 minute ago
Opinium/Observer: First #Tory lead since Mar'12 - Con 35%(+2), Lab 33%(-2), Lib Dems 6%(-2),UKIP 15%(+1),Green 7%(+1) http://tinyurl.com/k387tzy
0 -
Con Gain Twickers !0
-
Do we have the tables ?
0 -
OGH "All told a reassuring poll for the Tories from Opinium but on these figures LAB, even with Scotland problems, likely to have most seats."
Peter Kellner wrote in an article that if the Cons were ahead they would have most seats.0 -
Opinium had the Tories ahead last November in a poll they accidentally published on their website and I had noticed.
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2014/11/18/opinium-poll-that-slipped-out-has-con-ahead-with-the-lds-down-on-5/0 -
0
-
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.0 -
Any other polls expected this evening?0
-
#BackthebluesexceptinselectedseatsSunil_Prasannan said:@Pulpstar
Got a leaflet from Wes today!
#IlfordNorth0 -
Apart from the November 2014 one!Sunil_Prasannan said:First Tory lead in Opinium since March 2012
Opinium Research @OpiniumResearch · 1m1 minute ago
Opinium/Observer: First #Tory lead since Mar'12 - Con 35%(+2), Lab 33%(-2), Lib Dems 6%(-2),UKIP 15%(+1),Green 7%(+1) http://tinyurl.com/k387tzy
0 -
The score of tonight's YouGov will have been known since around 6pm Friday.Peter_the_Punter said:
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
Although YouGov generally have the strongest embargo policy out there.0 -
That wasn't in the Observer! (no sign of it remains on the Opinium website...)bigjohnowls said:
Apart from the November 2014 one!Sunil_Prasannan said:First Tory lead in Opinium since March 2012
Opinium Research @OpiniumResearch · 1m1 minute ago
Opinium/Observer: First #Tory lead since Mar'12 - Con 35%(+2), Lab 33%(-2), Lib Dems 6%(-2),UKIP 15%(+1),Green 7%(+1) http://tinyurl.com/k387tzy0 -
YouGov/Sunday Times expected overnight.rogerh said:Any other polls expected this evening?
0 -
-
Has the data been published for the Survation private poll for the Lib Dems showing them 'competitive' in Solihull,Wells et al ?0
-
If only Labour had a halfway respected leader.........
Perhaps on these numbers Cameron could hang on for a bit. Presumably if he did Labour would defenestrate Ed and get a more electable leader - Burnham? - to replace him before we had a second election with Farron likely leading the Lib Dems. I still think it looks difficult for Dave in the medium term.0 -
According to UK polling report totals of Tory 35%, Labour 33% and LD 6% would give Tory 300, Labour 311 and LD 11. Given Labour are likely to lose at least 20 seats to the SNP on present polling Labour would probably end up on 291, which would give the Tories a lead of 9, thus becoming the largest party by a small margin. However, a Tory LD deal would not have the numbers, whereas if the SNP won 35 seats that would give Labour + SNP 326, a majority of 1! So, Ed PM on a minority vote and seat total and reliant on the SNP to get a 1 seat majority - in essence, chaos! (If the LDs do a bit better in their seats as OGH suggests then another Tory LD deal may be possible)
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/swing-calculator0 -
Yeah looking at the sub samples.
Scotland
SNP 31, Con 28, Lab 25.
Okay.0 -
These splits are all very well but I want to have a look at the Scottish subsample too0
-
Miliband's inability to inspire remains one of the Conservatives best cards.antifrank said:0 -
i've saying/asking this for ages. WHEN are the LD's going to come out and shout about what they've done?rogerh said:
The Lib Dems are not getting any credit for good economic news because they don't appear to be shouting about it.In fact they do't appear to be shouting about anything -strange behavior as they need to be strongly visible in the air war.FrancisUrquhart said:Pretty clear from that chart, Tories appear to have picked up support from UKIP and Labour having some votes nicked by uptick in support for Greens....and still no sign that poor Lib Dems are getting any credit for economic good news etc.
Saying they've stopped Tories baby-eating isn't enough.0 -
Out next week.john_zims said:Has the data been published for the Survation private poll for the Lib Dems showing them 'competitive' in Solihull,Wells et al ?
0 -
Jacob Rees-Mogg MP for Glasgow EastTheScreamingEagles said:Yeah looking at the sub samples.
Scotland
SNP 31, Con 28, Lab 25.
Okay.0 -
If the LDs do a bit better in their seats as OGH suggests then another Tory LD deal may be possibleHYUFD said:According to UK polling report totals of Tory 35%, Labour 33% and LD 6% would give Tory 300, Labour 311 and LD 11. Given Labour are likely to lose at least 20 seats to the SNP on present polling Labour would probably end up on 291, which would give the Tories a lead of 9, thus becoming the largest party by a small margin. However, a Tory LD deal would not have the numbers, whereas if the SNP won 35 seats that would give Labour + SNP 326, a majority of 1! So, Ed PM on a minority vote and seat total and reliant on the SNP to get a 1 seat majority - in essence, chaos! (If the LDs do a bit better in their seats as OGH suggests then another Tory LD deal may be possible)
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/swing-calculator
Those "deep gains" are almost all Lib Dem-Con marginals so actually it doesn't matter for the arithmetic.0 -
Mr. Booth, Burnham's a lightweight who appears constantly on the verge of tears. Cooper would perhaps be the best realistic bet, if Johnson doesn't want it [he screwed up the GP contract negotiation and wasn't stellar as Shadow Chancellor, but he is normal and likeable].
Umunna would be worse than Miliband.0 -
Two Tory leads in the 18 last polls have come after 14th February.Peter_the_Punter said:
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
* In the 9 polls from 15th February onwards, average labour lead is below 1% (0.777%)
* In the 9 polls from 8th to 14th Feb, the average Labour lead was nearly 2% (1.777%)
Also I think OGH has made an Error. Tories are ahead in three polls out of last 18:
* Tonights Observer
* Yougov/Sun 9th Feb
* ICM/Guardian 15th Feb
0 -
And the Lib Dems just on 1% in Scotland.
Looking at it, if it has been normal North Britain sub sample the Tories would still be ahead by probably 1%.
But that's a very rough calculation.0 -
YG on the 9th is the 19th last poll!Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Two Tory leads in the 18 last polls have come after 14th February.Peter_the_Punter said:
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
* In the 9 polls from 15th February onwards, average labour lead is below 1% (0.777%)
* In the 9 polls from 8th to 14th Feb, the average Labour lead was nearly 2% (1.777%)
Also I think OGH has made an Error. Tories are ahead in three polls out of last 18:
* Tonights Observer
* Yougov/Sun 9th Feb
* ICM/Guardian 15th Feb0 -
Con gain Banff & Buchan and Western IslesAlanbrooke said:
Jacob Rees-Mogg MP for Glasgow EastTheScreamingEagles said:Yeah looking at the sub samples.
Scotland
SNP 31, Con 28, Lab 25.
Okay.0 -
Wow, Man City on fire, Newcastle heading for their worst defeat ever if this keeps up.
0 -
I don't advocate animal cruelty... but those Edinburgh pandas...TheScreamingEagles said:
Con gain Banff & Buchan and Western IslesAlanbrooke said:
Jacob Rees-Mogg MP for Glasgow EastTheScreamingEagles said:Yeah looking at the sub samples.
Scotland
SNP 31, Con 28, Lab 25.
Okay.0 -
Not according to Polling Report.Sunil_Prasannan said:
YG on the 9th is the 19th last poll!Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Two Tory leads in the 18 last polls have come after 14th February.Peter_the_Punter said:
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
* In the 9 polls from 15th February onwards, average labour lead is below 1% (0.777%)
* In the 9 polls from 8th to 14th Feb, the average Labour lead was nearly 2% (1.777%)
Also I think OGH has made an Error. Tories are ahead in three polls out of last 18:
* Tonights Observer
* Yougov/Sun 9th Feb
* ICM/Guardian 15th Feb
They have 10 for eleven weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9262
Plus tonights.
So seven from 12 weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9245
So its the Ashcroft one with the Tory lead that is 19th.
0 -
I think you have hit the nail on the head in the first part of your post as to why EICIPM is overpriced on Betfair compared to Lab most seats which itself is overpriced!!HYUFD said:According to UK polling report totals of Tory 35%, Labour 33% and LD 6% would give Tory 300, Labour 311 and LD 11. Given Labour are likely to lose at least 20 seats to the SNP on present polling Labour would probably end up on 291, which would give the Tories a lead of 9, thus becoming the largest party by a small margin. However, a Tory LD deal would not have the numbers, whereas if the SNP won 35 seats that would give Labour + SNP 326, a majority of 1! So, Ed PM on a minority vote and seat total and reliant on the SNP to get a 1 seat majority - in essence, chaos! (If the LDs do a bit better in their seats as OGH suggests then another Tory LD deal may be possible)
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/swing-calculator
I agree with your second part of the post but UNS doesnt work as underestimates Scotland but equally sugests Tories wii get as big a swing vs LD as Lab vs LD IMO they wont so i dont think your final part of your post is likely
0 -
Yep looks like a bit of a Scottish outlier, obviosuly the MoE is going to be enourmous - but the England and Wales figures are still relevant.TheScreamingEagles said:And the Lib Dems just on 1% in Scotland.
Looking at it, if it has been normal North Britain sub sample the Tories would still be ahead by probably 1%.
But that's a very rough calculation.0 -
Perhaps that's why Betfair most seats moved so much earlier?
Good to see OGH last tweet for consistency...0 -
Might just be a sampling thing but if Opinium have the Tories ahead then it could be an interesting period coming up with polls.
I can't help but think the last 4 weeks of the campaign will be positive for blue at the expense of red and purples.
When it comes down to it, a lot of floaters will eventually settle on not risking the current relatively benign economic situation against a vaguely ideological desire that Labour offer on fairness in society. Labour's shamelessly populist policies may also count against them at some point. Voters aren't stupid (the floaters aren't anyway).0 -
Blimey - Ed’s net rating amongst his own supporters leaves a lot to be desired.0
-
Pulpstar Indeed, it would rely on the LDs holding a few seats from Labour too, including Hallam!
BigjohnOwls Indeed, but Scotland is the key!0 -
Never read anything into subsamples, only how they could effect the sample overallPulpstar said:
Yep looks like a bit of a Scottish outlier, obviosuly the MoE is going to be enourmous - but the England and Wales figures are still relevant.TheScreamingEagles said:And the Lib Dems just on 1% in Scotland.
Looking at it, if it has been normal North Britain sub sample the Tories would still be ahead by probably 1%.
But that's a very rough calculation.0 -
No.Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Not according to Polling Report.Sunil_Prasannan said:
YG on the 9th is the 19th last poll!Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Two Tory leads in the 18 last polls have come after 14th February.Peter_the_Punter said:
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
* In the 9 polls from 15th February onwards, average labour lead is below 1% (0.777%)
* In the 9 polls from 8th to 14th Feb, the average Labour lead was nearly 2% (1.777%)
Also I think OGH has made an Error. Tories are ahead in three polls out of last 18:
* Tonights Observer
* Yougov/Sun 9th Feb
* ICM/Guardian 15th Feb
They have 10 for eleven weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9262
Plus tonights.
So seven from 12 weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9245
So its the Ashcroft one with the Tory lead that is 19th.
Why aren't you using the list on Wikipedia which I among others update almost daily?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2015_United_Kingdom_general_election0 -
On these numbers, the Conservatives would lose 52 English seats to Labour, but gain 9 Scottish seats from them. They'd gain 20 English Lib Dem seats, and 7 in Scotland.0
-
@Paul_Mid_Beds
Last 18 polls inc. Opinium:17–20 Feb Opinium/The Observer
18–19 Feb Populus
18–19 Feb YouGov/The Sun
17–18 Feb YouGov/The Sun
16–17 Feb YouGov/The Sun
15–16 Feb YouGov/The Sun
12–16 Feb TNS
13–15 Feb Lord Ashcroft
13–15 Feb Populus
13–15 Feb ICM/The Guardian
12–13 Feb YouGov/Sunday Times
11–12 Feb ComRes/Sunday Mirror/Independent on Sunday
11–12 Feb Populus
11–12 Feb YouGov/TheSun
10–12 Feb Opinium/The Observer
10–11 Feb YouGov/TheSun
9–10 Feb YouGov/TheSun
8–10 Feb Ipsos MORI/Evening Standard0 -
Because the wikipedia list contains the poll by TNS for the BBC that shouldn't be there, whilst Mr Wells wisely doesn't have it on his list.Sunil_Prasannan said:
No.Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Not according to Polling Report.Sunil_Prasannan said:
YG on the 9th is the 19th last poll!Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Two Tory leads in the 18 last polls have come after 14th February.Peter_the_Punter said:
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
* In the 9 polls from 15th February onwards, average labour lead is below 1% (0.777%)
* In the 9 polls from 8th to 14th Feb, the average Labour lead was nearly 2% (1.777%)
Also I think OGH has made an Error. Tories are ahead in three polls out of last 18:
* Tonights Observer
* Yougov/Sun 9th Feb
* ICM/Guardian 15th Feb
They have 10 for eleven weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9262
Plus tonights.
So seven from 12 weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9245
So its the Ashcroft one with the Tory lead that is 19th.
Why aren't you using the list on Wikipedia which I among others update almost daily?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2015_United_Kingdom_general_election0 -
Ahem... AFFECT!TheScreamingEagles said:
Never read anything into subsamples, only how they could effect the sample overallPulpstar said:
Yep looks like a bit of a Scottish outlier, obviosuly the MoE is going to be enourmous - but the England and Wales figures are still relevant.TheScreamingEagles said:And the Lib Dems just on 1% in Scotland.
Looking at it, if it has been normal North Britain sub sample the Tories would still be ahead by probably 1%.
But that's a very rough calculation.0 -
Heseltine on QT would have helped Con over the last few days.
OK, the audience is only just under 3 million but he is in a completely different league to all the lightweight performers of today.
After Cameron, Con's best bet is to get Major and Heseltine on the TV as much as possible.0 -
Fascinating regional breakdown on EU poll from p56 of the Opinium tables England Stay 49% Leave 51% Wales Stay 44% Leave 58% Scotland Stay 50% Leave 50%
So more Welsh want to leave than English and the Scots are split down the middle!
http://ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/sites/ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/files/vi_17_02_2015_final_tables.pdf0 -
Greetings from the canary islandsc windy but no snow as there was in the uk this am. This poll is more good news for Dave its going in the
right direction0 -
Lab most seats - no really my sides. Cam level on leader ratings..0
-
That was well before "the last 18 polls" that Paul is querying.TheScreamingEagles said:
Because the wikipedia list contains the poll by TNS for the BBC that shouldn't be there, whilst Mr Wells wisely doesn't have it on his list.Sunil_Prasannan said:
No.Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Not according to Polling Report.Sunil_Prasannan said:
YG on the 9th is the 19th last poll!Paul_Mid_Beds said:
Two Tory leads in the 18 last polls have come after 14th February.Peter_the_Punter said:
Even if the poll had leaked, it would hardly have justified the tightening of the Tory price we saw today.Pulpstar said:
How many people have these polls before they're out ? 10, 100, 1000 ?Sean_F said:This must have sparked the tightening in the Conservative price, earlier today.
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
* In the 9 polls from 15th February onwards, average labour lead is below 1% (0.777%)
* In the 9 polls from 8th to 14th Feb, the average Labour lead was nearly 2% (1.777%)
Also I think OGH has made an Error. Tories are ahead in three polls out of last 18:
* Tonights Observer
* Yougov/Sun 9th Feb
* ICM/Guardian 15th Feb
They have 10 for eleven weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9262
Plus tonights.
So seven from 12 weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9245
So its the Ashcroft one with the Tory lead that is 19th.
Why aren't you using the list on Wikipedia which I among others update almost daily?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2015_United_Kingdom_general_election0 -
Evening all and a very disingenuous headline that only 2 out of 18 polls have had Tory leads. Neither Opinium nor ICM produce polls like diahorrea the way YouGov does. One thing is for sure we now know TNS is just garbage and should be ignored. 3 consecutive months with 7% Labour leads.
Jim Murphy starting to look and sound pathetic in Scotland now begging Yes voters to support Labour in May. If he is going to be hammered, he could at least behave with a little dignity.0 -
The electorate's fear about @TheGreenParty's economics in a nutshell
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-Y_vsAIEAAR19e.jpg0 -
@TSE
Last 18 polls inc. Opinium:17–20 Feb Opinium/The Observer
18–19 Feb Populus
18–19 Feb YouGov/The Sun
17–18 Feb YouGov/The Sun
16–17 Feb YouGov/The Sun
15–16 Feb YouGov/The Sun
12–16 Feb TNS
13–15 Feb Lord Ashcroft
13–15 Feb Populus
13–15 Feb ICM/The Guardian
12–13 Feb YouGov/Sunday Times
11–12 Feb ComRes/Sunday Mirror/Independent on Sunday
11–12 Feb Populus
11–12 Feb YouGov/TheSun
10–12 Feb Opinium/The Observer
10–11 Feb YouGov/TheSun
9–10 Feb YouGov/TheSun
8–10 Feb Ipsos MORI/Evening Standard0 -
Labour to give John Prescott a frontline general election role
Ed Miliband brings back former deputy prime minister to ‘bash heads together’ as Conservatives edge ahead in polls
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/21/labour-john-prescott-election-miliband-conservatives?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter0 -
Mr. Eagles, a fantastic little cartoon.0
-
A poll is a poll. Each YouGov is unique - they aren't clones.Easterross said:Evening all and a very disingenuous headline that only 2 out of 18 polls have had Tory leads. Neither Opinium nor ICM produce polls like diahorrea the way YouGov does. One thing is for sure we now know TNS is just garbage and should be ignored. 3 consecutive months with 7% Labour leads.
And TNS should be ignored because they don't give the results you want?
"These aren't the polls leads you're looking for!"
0 -
@Pulpstar - for our Grimsby bets
Veteran Labour MP Austin Mitchell has dismissed Ukip’s chances of winning the Great Grimsby constituency at the general election, saying that Labour would win the hotly contested seat “even” if it had selected a “raving alcoholic sex paedophile” as its candidate.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/labour-mp-austin-mitchell-even-if-we-selected-a-raving-alcoholic-sex-paedophile-we-wouldnt-lose-grimsby-10061754.html0 -
A yellow box!Sunil_Prasannan said:@TSE
Last 18 polls inc. Opinium:17–20 Feb Opinium/The Observer
18–19 Feb Populus
18–19 Feb YouGov/The Sun
17–18 Feb YouGov/The Sun
16–17 Feb YouGov/The Sun
15–16 Feb YouGov/The Sun
12–16 Feb TNS
13–15 Feb Lord Ashcroft
13–15 Feb Populus
13–15 Feb ICM/The Guardian
12–13 Feb YouGov/Sunday Times
11–12 Feb ComRes/Sunday Mirror/Independent on Sunday
11–12 Feb Populus
11–12 Feb YouGov/TheSun
10–12 Feb Opinium/The Observer
10–11 Feb YouGov/TheSun
9–10 Feb YouGov/TheSun
8–10 Feb Ipsos MORI/Evening Standard
0 -
Ashcroft 34% (9/2/15)
ICM 'outlier' 36%
Ipsos 34% (35% on 8/10 or 9/10 intent to vote)
Opinium 35%
0 -
I would take the Scottish (and Welsh) figures in Opinium with a bucket-load of salt. Since they changed their methodology earlier this month, the SNP have been massively down-weighted each time. Their polls since then have shown weird Scottish sub-sample scores.HYUFD said:Fascinating regional breakdown on EU poll from p56 of the Opinium tables England Stay 49% Leave 51% Wales Stay 44% Leave 58% Scotland Stay 50% Leave 50%
So more Welsh want to leave than English and the Scots are split down the middle!
http://ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/sites/ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/files/vi_17_02_2015_final_tables.pdf0 -
I am Avery!JohnLilburne said:
A yellow box!Sunil_Prasannan said:@TSE
Last 18 polls inc. Opinium:17–20 Feb Opinium/The Observer
18–19 Feb Populus
18–19 Feb YouGov/The Sun
17–18 Feb YouGov/The Sun
16–17 Feb YouGov/The Sun
15–16 Feb YouGov/The Sun
12–16 Feb TNS
13–15 Feb Lord Ashcroft
13–15 Feb Populus
13–15 Feb ICM/The Guardian
12–13 Feb YouGov/Sunday Times
11–12 Feb ComRes/Sunday Mirror/Independent on Sunday
11–12 Feb Populus
11–12 Feb YouGov/TheSun
10–12 Feb Opinium/The Observer
10–11 Feb YouGov/TheSun
9–10 Feb YouGov/TheSun
8–10 Feb Ipsos MORI/Evening Standard0 -
Amusing indeed, and probably fair too with the Greens, although the worry must surely be that as they will never get a chance to implement their economic ideas, would it really dissuade someone considering voting for them as a protest only?TheScreamingEagles said:The electorate's fear about @TheGreenParty's economics in a nutshell
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-Y_vsAIEAAR19e.jpg
I bet if YouGov had been showing consistent Tory leads in that period and the statement was '10 of the last 18 polls have Tory leads' there would not be a problem with including the incessant YouGovs.Easterross said:Evening all and a very disingenuous headline that only 2 out of 18 polls have had Tory leads. Neither Opinium nor ICM produce polls like diahorrea the way YouGov does. .
Indeed. I get her's not great, but it's amazing he is apparently not regarded well by enough of his own party that they are underrating their own chances as a result.SimonStClare said:Blimey - Ed’s net rating amongst his own supporters leaves a lot to be desired.
0 -
Mr. Chestnut, good spot. The Conservatives *may* have moved up, or this could be a blip of good fortune for them.0
-
bring on the clowns.TheScreamingEagles said:Labour to give John Prescott a frontline general election role
Ed Miliband brings back former deputy prime minister to ‘bash heads together’ as Conservatives edge ahead in polls
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/21/labour-john-prescott-election-miliband-conservatives?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter0 -
Sunil, you are right that each poll is independent, but each polling house has its own biases. If you want to even out polls, you should do and average of only the latest polls from a given polling house, as RCP does with US polls, otherwise you are weighting your average to the biases of the house which polls most frequently. Now if YouGov do multiple series (e.g. a daily, a weekly and then one or more commissioned for others) you might be justified in including the latest of each series. But I am with Easterross on this one - and not just because it gives the result I don't like.Sunil_Prasannan said:
A poll is a poll. Each YouGov is unique - they aren't clones.Easterross said:Evening all and a very disingenuous headline that only 2 out of 18 polls have had Tory leads. Neither Opinium nor ICM produce polls like diahorrea the way YouGov does. One thing is for sure we now know TNS is just garbage and should be ignored. 3 consecutive months with 7% Labour leads.
And TNS should be ignored because they don't give the results you want?
"These aren't the polls leads you're looking for!"0 -
JamesMo Maybe, but in the euro elections UKIP got 27.5% in Wales and only 10.4% in Scotland so the results are probably not that far off!0
-
The YG POLLS are kinda cloney - they're too close together to be anything else until much nearer polling day.Sunil_Prasannan said:
A poll is a poll. Each YouGov is unique - they aren't clones.Easterross said:Evening all and a very disingenuous headline that only 2 out of 18 polls have had Tory leads. Neither Opinium nor ICM produce polls like diahorrea the way YouGov does. One thing is for sure we now know TNS is just garbage and should be ignored. 3 consecutive months with 7% Labour leads.
And TNS should be ignored because they don't give the results you want?
"These aren't the polls leads you're looking for!"
Today's Opinium is the perfect response to the rather bizarre header in the previous thread although no doubt people are frantically thinking of all the reasons why it doesn't count like the ICM one from Monday.0 -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojmH97FntMEchestnut said:Ashcroft 34% (9/2/15)
ICM 'outlier' 36%
Ipsos 34% (35% on 8/10 or 9/10 intent to vote)
Opinium 35%0 -
I happen to agree with Easterross about TNS which part weights its samples to what they did at last year's Euros when turnout was just 36%. That's going to be good for UKIP and bad for CON & LD.Sunil_Prasannan said:
A poll is a poll. Each YouGov is unique - they aren't clones.Easterross said:Evening all and a very disingenuous headline that only 2 out of 18 polls have had Tory leads. Neither Opinium nor ICM produce polls like diahorrea the way YouGov does. One thing is for sure we now know TNS is just garbage and should be ignored. 3 consecutive months with 7% Labour leads.
And TNS should be ignored because they don't give the results you want?
"These aren't the polls leads you're looking for!"
0 -
YouGov polls were showing the opposite at the end of last year, better polls for the Tories and narrower Labour leads than other pollsters. It won't be a problem closer to the election where we'll get a multitude of polls from different polling companies.0
-
And to punch a few constituents?TheScreamingEagles said:Labour to give John Prescott a frontline general election role
Ed Miliband brings back former deputy prime minister to ‘bash heads together’ as Conservatives edge ahead in polls
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/21/labour-john-prescott-election-miliband-conservatives?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
0 -
I haven't looked at the detail of an Opinium poll before. Is it always the case that the Tories receive a significant uplift from Opinium through the weightings? The raw figures seem to be:
Con 30%
Lab 34%
LD 6%
SNP 4%
PC 1%
UKIP 16%
Green 7%
BNP 1%
Other 1%
PS Isn't Opinium's presentation of the detailed data dreadful?0 -
I think Kellner is wrong. CON is going to struggle against the LDs in yellow held seats and there's the England effect which he hasn't addressed.TCPoliticalBetting said:OGH "All told a reassuring poll for the Tories from Opinium but on these figures LAB, even with Scotland problems, likely to have most seats."
Peter Kellner wrote in an article that if the Cons were ahead they would have most seats.
0 -
Yes!Hengists_Gift said:PS Isn't Opinium's presentation of the detailed data dreadful?
I think Opinium (and others) rejigged their weighting in January.Hengists_Gift said:I haven't looked at the detail of an Opinium poll before. Is it always the case that the Tories receive a significant uplift from Opinium through the weightings?
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9244
0 -
Maybe, just maybe that ICM wasn't an outlier.0
-
0
-
Don't mock. My great-great-great-grandfather was MP for Glasgow for many years.TheScreamingEagles said:
Con gain Banff & Buchan and Western IslesAlanbrooke said:
Jacob Rees-Mogg MP for Glasgow EastTheScreamingEagles said:Yeah looking at the sub samples.
Scotland
SNP 31, Con 28, Lab 25.
Okay.0 -
At the last GE, he was such a turn off there wasn't even enough people for him to punch. There was that great picture where he was giving it the big John shouty Tory baby eater speech and one women in a shop-mobility potters past and that is it.perdix said:
And to punch a few constituents?TheScreamingEagles said:Labour to give John Prescott a frontline general election role
Ed Miliband brings back former deputy prime minister to ‘bash heads together’ as Conservatives edge ahead in polls
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/21/labour-john-prescott-election-miliband-conservatives?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ttmMQSF70OA/S8xEf-e5qfI/AAAAAAAAAsA/ESUUBoNM0vM/s1600/Prescott.JPG0 -
Kellner comes across as one of those new Labour types who's desperate for Ed to lose. Perhaps that's unfair and he's just a typical Labour pessimist or he really believes that's what the data says but it's always hard to be truly impartial.MikeSmithson said:
I think Kellner is wrong. CON is going to struggle against the LDs in yellow held seats and there's the England effect which he hasn't addressed.TCPoliticalBetting said:OGH "All told a reassuring poll for the Tories from Opinium but on these figures LAB, even with Scotland problems, likely to have most seats."
Peter Kellner wrote in an article that if the Cons were ahead they would have most seats.0 -
Aargh ........ I see Mike yet again, for the umpteenth time, quotes his 11.4% statistic within this threader head!
The truth is that Opinium's key finding is that the difference in the VI between the two major parties (let's not foolishly refer to the LibDems as such any longer) has narrowed by 4% in the Tories' favour since their previous poll. This is potentially hugely significant in terms of the number of seats it would move as Mike is only too well aware.
Indeed I very much doubt he would have written this morning's thread, at least in such damning terms from the Blues' perspective had he been aware of the numbers in Opinium's poll set to be released just a few hours later - for it largely answers his expressed puzzlement as regards why such diverse expert opinions held by the likes of Stephen Fisher, Peter Kellner, Matthew Shaddick, Rod Crosby, etc all continue to hold a relatively bullish view of the Tories' GE seats prospects.
We have now seen significant shifts of opinion in favour of the Tories having been reported by ICM and now by Opinium. Were these to be replicated by say another couple of respected pollsters (as opposed to the Mickey Mouse variety) over the next couple of weeks or so, then this would more than justify the current betting market odds, irrespective of Mike's 11.4% mantra, whether he likes it or not!0 -
@MikeSmithson
'CON is going to struggle against the LDs in yellow held seats and there's the England effect which he hasn't addressed. '
How can you claim that when the latest polling,the Lib Dem Survation data has yet to be published and we don't yet know what 'competitive' means?0 -
Ashcroft has the Tories winning or level in around a dozen LD seats and within 4 points on another four.
0 -
Cons held Banff when I lived in Banffshire :-)TheScreamingEagles said:
Con gain Banff & Buchan and Western IslesAlanbrooke said:
Jacob Rees-Mogg MP for Glasgow EastTheScreamingEagles said:Yeah looking at the sub samples.
Scotland
SNP 31, Con 28, Lab 25.
Okay.
0