politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Opinium has the Tories 2% ahead fir the first time since it started it Observer series
Trend chart from Opinium which has just recorded its first ever CON lead in its Observer polling series pic.twitter.com/o4q9cS3RlB
Read the full story here
Comments
I note that one of the old liberal MPs has recently died. Lord Mackie of Benshie became Liberal MP for Caithness and Sutherland in 1964, but was beaten by Robert Maclennan in 1966. He lived to a ripe old age of 95.
It's most noteworthy for it being the first time the Tories have led for three years with this pollster. But it is still just one poll.
I contended months ago that only on St Valentines day or thereabouts would the elecorate start to notice an election was imminent due to the fixed term parliament removing the "will he go to the Queen next week" element of speculation. Therefore until st valentine's day the electorate would use opinion polls to kick the government. Only after Feb 14th would they look closely at who the next PM would be, take one look at Millipede and say 'not you mate'.
Part-ELBOW inc. Opinium = Lab 1.0% lead
Just YG/Sunday Times left...
Opinium Research @OpiniumResearch · 1m1 minute ago
Opinium/Observer: First #Tory lead since Mar'12 - Con 35%(+2), Lab 33%(-2), Lib Dems 6%(-2),UKIP 15%(+1),Green 7%(+1) http://tinyurl.com/k387tzy
Peter Kellner wrote in an article that if the Cons were ahead they would have most seats.
http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2014/11/18/opinium-poll-that-slipped-out-has-con-ahead-with-the-lds-down-on-5/
Got a leaflet from Wes today!
#IlfordNorth
It would need three or four such polls to justify such a swing, and you would then expect to see corresponding movements on linked markets, such as Overall Majority and the Spreads.
No, I think it was just a certain amount of exuberance amongst blue backers which just happened to coincide with a decent poll.
Yet UKIP are despised and Labour are loved
Although YouGov generally have the strongest embargo policy out there.
Perhaps on these numbers Cameron could hang on for a bit. Presumably if he did Labour would defenestrate Ed and get a more electable leader - Burnham? - to replace him before we had a second election with Farron likely leading the Lib Dems. I still think it looks difficult for Dave in the medium term.
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/swing-calculator
Scotland
SNP 31, Con 28, Lab 25.
Okay.
Saying they've stopped Tories baby-eating isn't enough.
Those "deep gains" are almost all Lib Dem-Con marginals so actually it doesn't matter for the arithmetic.
Umunna would be worse than Miliband.
* In the 9 polls from 15th February onwards, average labour lead is below 1% (0.777%)
* In the 9 polls from 8th to 14th Feb, the average Labour lead was nearly 2% (1.777%)
Also I think OGH has made an Error. Tories are ahead in three polls out of last 18:
* Tonights Observer
* Yougov/Sun 9th Feb
* ICM/Guardian 15th Feb
Looking at it, if it has been normal North Britain sub sample the Tories would still be ahead by probably 1%.
But that's a very rough calculation.
They have 10 for eleven weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9262
Plus tonights.
So seven from 12 weeks to go http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9245
So its the Ashcroft one with the Tory lead that is 19th.
I agree with your second part of the post but UNS doesnt work as underestimates Scotland but equally sugests Tories wii get as big a swing vs LD as Lab vs LD IMO they wont so i dont think your final part of your post is likely
Good to see OGH last tweet for consistency...
I can't help but think the last 4 weeks of the campaign will be positive for blue at the expense of red and purples.
When it comes down to it, a lot of floaters will eventually settle on not risking the current relatively benign economic situation against a vaguely ideological desire that Labour offer on fairness in society. Labour's shamelessly populist policies may also count against them at some point. Voters aren't stupid (the floaters aren't anyway).
BigjohnOwls Indeed, but Scotland is the key!
Why aren't you using the list on Wikipedia which I among others update almost daily?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_2015_United_Kingdom_general_election
Last 18 polls inc. Opinium:
OK, the audience is only just under 3 million but he is in a completely different league to all the lightweight performers of today.
After Cameron, Con's best bet is to get Major and Heseltine on the TV as much as possible.
So more Welsh want to leave than English and the Scots are split down the middle!
http://ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/sites/ourinsight.opinium.co.uk/files/vi_17_02_2015_final_tables.pdf
right direction
Jim Murphy starting to look and sound pathetic in Scotland now begging Yes voters to support Labour in May. If he is going to be hammered, he could at least behave with a little dignity.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/B-Y_vsAIEAAR19e.jpg
Last 18 polls inc. Opinium:
Ed Miliband brings back former deputy prime minister to ‘bash heads together’ as Conservatives edge ahead in polls
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2015/feb/21/labour-john-prescott-election-miliband-conservatives?utm_source=dlvr.it&utm_medium=twitter
And TNS should be ignored because they don't give the results you want?
"These aren't the polls leads you're looking for!"
Veteran Labour MP Austin Mitchell has dismissed Ukip’s chances of winning the Great Grimsby constituency at the general election, saying that Labour would win the hotly contested seat “even” if it had selected a “raving alcoholic sex paedophile” as its candidate.
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/generalelection/labour-mp-austin-mitchell-even-if-we-selected-a-raving-alcoholic-sex-paedophile-we-wouldnt-lose-grimsby-10061754.html
ICM 'outlier' 36%
Ipsos 34% (35% on 8/10 or 9/10 intent to vote)
Opinium 35%
Today's Opinium is the perfect response to the rather bizarre header in the previous thread although no doubt people are frantically thinking of all the reasons why it doesn't count like the ICM one from Monday.
Con 30%
Lab 34%
LD 6%
SNP 4%
PC 1%
UKIP 16%
Green 7%
BNP 1%
Other 1%
PS Isn't Opinium's presentation of the detailed data dreadful?
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/blog/archives/9244
comments like that will be stamped on. ; )
http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_ttmMQSF70OA/S8xEf-e5qfI/AAAAAAAAAsA/ESUUBoNM0vM/s1600/Prescott.JPG
The truth is that Opinium's key finding is that the difference in the VI between the two major parties (let's not foolishly refer to the LibDems as such any longer) has narrowed by 4% in the Tories' favour since their previous poll. This is potentially hugely significant in terms of the number of seats it would move as Mike is only too well aware.
Indeed I very much doubt he would have written this morning's thread, at least in such damning terms from the Blues' perspective had he been aware of the numbers in Opinium's poll set to be released just a few hours later - for it largely answers his expressed puzzlement as regards why such diverse expert opinions held by the likes of Stephen Fisher, Peter Kellner, Matthew Shaddick, Rod Crosby, etc all continue to hold a relatively bullish view of the Tories' GE seats prospects.
We have now seen significant shifts of opinion in favour of the Tories having been reported by ICM and now by Opinium. Were these to be replicated by say another couple of respected pollsters (as opposed to the Mickey Mouse variety) over the next couple of weeks or so, then this would more than justify the current betting market odds, irrespective of Mike's 11.4% mantra, whether he likes it or not!
'CON is going to struggle against the LDs in yellow held seats and there's the England effect which he hasn't addressed. '
How can you claim that when the latest polling,the Lib Dem Survation data has yet to be published and we don't yet know what 'competitive' means?