Starmer & the government’s ratings improve from dire to the merely appalling – politicalbetting.com
Starmer & the government’s ratings improve from dire to the merely appalling – politicalbetting.com
When it comes to leader ratings Ipsos are the gold standard and as predicted following Trump’s recent actions I am not surprised that Starmer’s ratings have improved but before Labour supporters put up the bunting the latest ratings are not the ratings of a governent that is going to be re-elected.
1
Comments
.....Stay out Starmer
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yp4HY-M7yoM
"For a ship with no destination no wind is favourable"
(Confucius)
What I've kept from my lawyering days is an instinct to define terms at the outset. So many arguments can be avoided or at least reduced in scope by doing this. To be fair, contributors to PB are generally better at doing this than the wider public.
Never wished to have one.
I have gone against financial advisors advice. I have other long term stock options and frankly couldn't give a shit what anyone else thinks.
Life isn't all about screwing the system for every penny.
I pay more than my fair whack.
My partner has iSAs we disagree about it.
Evasion is evasion
Avoidance is avoidance
Each to their own
I neither evade nor knowingly avoid.
Simple
I praise other Tories, current and past.
Badenoch is a gibshite with an aggression issue who is not fit to lead any Party.
State
Private
Trump: "I knew the Strait would be a weapon. I predicted it a long time ago. I predicted all of this stuff. I predicted Osama bin Laden would knock out the World Trade Center. I wrote it in a book."
Mike Johnson talks about how Trump encouraged a Republican member of Congress who got a terminal diagnosis to keep coming to work so Democrats wouldn't pick up a seat as though this is a commendable thing
https://bsky.app/profile/atrupar.com/post/3mh6vrn6rmx23
I have
Thats not evasion
It's available to anybody
He/she is real. I have no doubt about that.
Bullies can't stand it when someone fights back.
I'm not sure I mentioned any women.
I don't see what you have against ISAs. They were set up to encourage spending. They're not some obscure loophole being exploited - they do what they were designed to do.
On this issue only
Trump would have lobbed one enormous bomb, and declared victory.
"Just because of Trump doesn't make people in the UK think less of America"
Try asking the airlines.......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_pWZqoRnWRA
I think there is something in the argument that collectively such schemes are too generous to high earners but that is up to the state to change the rules rather than some weird and illogical self moral restraint from taxpayers.
If he has broken the law on tax, then the HMRC should pull his socks up over his head.
If he hasn't broken the law, then the party of government shouldn't complain about it. They have the ability to change the law. Even make new ones.
but on pension tax free lump sums: "Thats not evasion. It's available to anybody"
You couldn't make less sense if you tried.
It proves I am an ethical socialist not a champagne one.
I’m still depleting my ‘fuck you’ money as well as two old DB schemes.
Anyway, my apologies for butting in.
Don't measure me, or anyone else, by conventional measures. No one is perfect, we're not clones
I'm comfortable with my decisions
If he didn’t he’d be better off banging it in an S&S vehicle, like an ISA, where it is accessible when you like. The returns longer term should be better than cash.
Is that a nautical term of disapprobation ?
Labour are making a fuss about it as whataboutery due to Rayner and her tax issues.
As adults we can shelter a further £20k per year for life.
It doesn't seem a strong argument. The limits weirdly fit a typical MPs lifestyle very nicely indeed.
Next you will be saying the tax status of two people buying houses in London, then renting from each other, so they can claim rent from their employer on (in effect) paying the mortgage is a complete accident.
This is nuts.
Carnival and CRH both plan to delist in London
Low valuations don’t help but neither does the DEi bollocks. Why list, just stay private and access capital from lenders.
https://x.com/merrynsw/status/2033449361397497894?s=61
This really is not good and the govt small concession, no stamp duty on shares of new listings for a few years won’t help and the govt wants to dip its hand into our pension pots to invest in its pet schemes. Fuck that.
https://x.com/jamesd_graham/status/2033512910647877746?s=61
https://x.com/jamesd_graham/status/2033512914473075158?s=61
You don't have to be as firmly on one side in the Middle East conflict as Roger is to think America has made a right bollocks of this.
On a happier note, my tram ride has just been interrupted by the arrival of a panicked pigeon erroneously boarding at Piccadilly Gardens: impressed to report that a gifted passenger was able to calmy usher the pigeon off without any harm being done.
*FWIW, the UK was about 18th, about equal with France and Germany. As you'd expect, Nordics came top.
I agree, Yvette Cooper is a decent trading bet, 20/1 best odds currently. Especially if you have backed Rayner, Miliband and Healey at far longer odds than you can get on them now. Like Miliband, Cooper has had ambitions to be Labour leader because she stood in 2015.
Of the viable candidates for next PM, I wouldn't look beyond Rayner, Miliband, Streeting, Cooper and Healey now. There will be a contest under way by June 2026. Rayner or Miliband will be the candidate of the left, Streeting the candidate of the right, leaving a space for either Cooper or Healey to come through the middle. It's very difficult to see more than 3 candidates making it past the 80 nominations threshold.
A real twat?
C'est la vie!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g8MDQhBckus