Skip to content

Soon we could see the Tories fifth in the polling – politicalbetting.com

123468

Comments

  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,423
    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    Possibly, for some reason I can't fathom, the woman who was gang-raped in a churchyard hasn't provided a detailed description of the attackers yet? Possibly she's a little sad. Maybe a bit ditzy. Hard to think of a good reason.

    And being outraged while writing "she witnessed her own gang rape" is a new low, even for you.
    Bollocks

    If you go back in time, as many have done on social media today, in olden days the police had no trouble in releasing this info very quickly after an alleged crime such as rape. "White, five foot seven, medium build", "black, 5 foot 10, athletic", "weak, 4 foot ten, a centrist Dad on a forum mainly for twats, apart from that one cool dude"

    I do not believe this was because they were Awful Racists Back Then. It's because this is basic police work: be honest, warn the public
    That still assumes they had a description from the victim of this hideous crime. If the police have one and have withheld it - that's an issue for them to explain. If, by some remote inexplicable chance, the woman who has been gang raped in a churchyard hasn't given one - then that's really quite different.

    The official police statement is at :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    Maybe they're useless, feckless woke fools. I have no idea. But stirring up hysteria on the back of, at the risk of repeating the real issue, a woman being gang raped by men in a churchyard, seems quite repulsive.
    Oh STFU

    I didn't bring up this story, @turbotubbs did

    Nor am I roiling the waters on social media, I am on PB

    Have a Hobnob, and chill out, knobhead
    I take your guilty apology - thank you!
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,214
    Sign of the times that the first thing people want to know after a reported rape is the ethnicity of the aggressor.

    Still, at least they’re not all speculating about whether the aggressor was trans, so there’s that.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,811
    algarkirk said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I am a member of the Tory Party, I first joined in 1997, a few days after the election as a callow 18 year old.
    There is an irrational surd about party membership; in some way it commits you however mildly to the concept of party X being right and parties not-X being in some way wrong. Patently this can't be true or in any sense a complete idea, and any party worthy of having sensible members at all joins with all other decent parties in wanting what Iris Murdoch would call 'The Sovereignty of Good', or catholic social theology calls 'the common good'.

    So I am left in the uncomfortable position of thinking that multi party democracy is the best available way, that party membership is essential to its health but there are good reasons for not joining one. So I never have.

    More pragmatically, I would not want to join any party that would want me as a member, and the thought of sitting in meetings with other party members waiting to go home and pretending to like it freezes the blood. Like, for those who know the horrific inner life of the Church of England, a never ending deanery synod.
    I'm not too happy in membership, for the reasons in my other post, but that doesn't in my experience describe a party meeting accurately. The people who are unhappy tend to stop attending meetings. The meetings themselves are generally amicable and constructive, and a reason to carry on.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,700
    edited September 28
    I wonder if the reason American golf fans get over-excited, is because Americans actually get very few chances to shout "USA! USA!" in major international team sports events

    In the wanky Yankee team sports they really care about, NFL, baseball, basketball, they have almost no international competition, so no one else cares, because these sports are shit

    That leaves soccer, where they aren't that good, the Olympics, and Ryder Cup Golf
  • isamisam Posts: 42,732
    I’ve said many times that people on unemployment benefits should have them stopped after three months if they refuse to accept an unskilled job. Labour are proposing a weaker version of this, but at least it’s a step in the right direction

    Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job offers

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/6d684895-0c77-4ecc-8004-e443130ddcda?shareToken=adaf465543fbc57a3b3195895ec86ac7
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 7,309
    Foxy said:

    carnforth said:

    Moldova appears to be rejecting the pro-Russian party:

    https://pv.cec.md/preliminare

    It depends on which districts have reported surely?
    Less than 10% of Chisinau counted, apparently. And diaspora votes very anti-Russian.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    Possibly, for some reason I can't fathom, the woman who was gang-raped in a churchyard hasn't provided a detailed description of the attackers yet? Possibly she's a little sad. Maybe a bit ditzy. Hard to think of a good reason.

    And being outraged while writing "she witnessed her own gang rape" is a new low, even for you.
    Bollocks

    If you go back in time, as many have done on social media today, in olden days the police had no trouble in releasing this info very quickly after an alleged crime such as rape. "White, five foot seven, medium build", "black, 5 foot 10, athletic", "weak, 4 foot ten, a centrist Dad on a forum mainly for twats, apart from that one cool dude"

    I do not believe this was because they were Awful Racists Back Then. It's because this is basic police work: be honest, warn the public
    That still assumes they had a description from the victim of this hideous crime. If the police have one and have withheld it - that's an issue for them to explain. If, by some remote inexplicable chance, the woman who has been gang raped in a churchyard hasn't given one - then that's really quite different.

    The official police statement is at :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    Maybe they're useless, feckless woke fools. I have no idea. But stirring up hysteria on the back of, at the risk of repeating the real issue, a woman being gang raped by men in a churchyard, seems quite repulsive.
    Oh STFU

    I didn't bring up this story, @turbotubbs did

    Nor am I roiling the waters on social media, I am on PB

    Have a Hobnob, and chill out, knobhead
    I take your guilty apology - thank you!
    And people wonder why reform are doing so well in the polls. It's ALL linked. The way the state behaves. Arresting Graham Linehan with 5 armed police for X posts made while in the US. Becoming coy about suspects ethnicity. The Post Office scandal.
    All the time, chipping away.

    I loathe reform and everything they stand for. But if people don't wake up they will wake to a nightmare in 2029.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,423

    ohnotnow said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The police statement is online :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    No mention of a description - what do you want the BBC to say? Have a go at the police - but I'm not sure it's the BBC's fault.
    FFS read what I wrote. I explicitly suggested it might be the police.
    Then why begin with "Another classic of reporting from the BBC" and link to the BBC website and not look up the statement from the police and link to that, saving us all some trouble?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    ohnotnow said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The police statement is online :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    No mention of a description - what do you want the BBC to say? Have a go at the police - but I'm not sure it's the BBC's fault.
    FFS read what I wrote. I explicitly suggested it might be the police.
    Then why begin with "Another classic of reporting from the BBC" and link to the BBC website and not look up the statement from the police and link to that, saving us all some trouble?
    Was my sentence construction too difficult to understand?
  • BattlebusBattlebus Posts: 1,627

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I'm still a Labour member, and chair of my constituency party. I disagree with a number of current policies, in particular the large cut in foreign aid and the large increase in military spending, but I remain an active member for now. When the new party has had its first conference and clarified its position, and it's clear whether it has a reasonable chance of a significant share of the votes, I'll consider switching - but after 54 years in Labour it's not a decision to take casually.
    Would you consider accepting that military aid is normally foreign.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 40,843
    isam said:

    I’ve said many times that people on unemployment benefits should have them stopped after three months if they refuse to accept an unskilled job. Labour are proposing a weaker version of this, but at least it’s a step in the right direction

    Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job offers

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/6d684895-0c77-4ecc-8004-e443130ddcda?shareToken=adaf465543fbc57a3b3195895ec86ac7

    Anxiety claims for PIP will shoot through the roof.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403
    carnforth said:

    Foxy said:

    carnforth said:

    Moldova appears to be rejecting the pro-Russian party:

    https://pv.cec.md/preliminare

    It depends on which districts have reported surely?
    Less than 10% of Chisinau counted, apparently. And diaspora votes very anti-Russian.
    Yes in the Presidential election the Diaspora vote was 20% of the total and over 80% pro EU.

    It's a party list system with a 5% threshold and 101 seats I believe.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404
    Justin Rose is on a roll. He was three shots down and has pulled them all back. Two holes to go.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    MaxPB said:

    isam said:

    I’ve said many times that people on unemployment benefits should have them stopped after three months if they refuse to accept an unskilled job. Labour are proposing a weaker version of this, but at least it’s a step in the right direction

    Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job offers

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/6d684895-0c77-4ecc-8004-e443130ddcda?shareToken=adaf465543fbc57a3b3195895ec86ac7

    Anxiety claims for PIP will shoot through the roof.
    Judging from my pharmacy students id say 1 in 4 already registered as 'anxious'.
  • isam said:

    I’ve said many times that people on unemployment benefits should have them stopped after three months if they refuse to accept an unskilled job. Labour are proposing a weaker version of this, but at least it’s a step in the right direction

    Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job offers

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/6d684895-0c77-4ecc-8004-e443130ddcda?shareToken=adaf465543fbc57a3b3195895ec86ac7

    There have been variants of this for my whole adult life, and every couple of years the governing party make this pledge as if it would be something new and different.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403

    MaxPB said:

    isam said:

    I’ve said many times that people on unemployment benefits should have them stopped after three months if they refuse to accept an unskilled job. Labour are proposing a weaker version of this, but at least it’s a step in the right direction

    Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job offers

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/6d684895-0c77-4ecc-8004-e443130ddcda?shareToken=adaf465543fbc57a3b3195895ec86ac7

    Anxiety claims for PIP will shoot through the roof.
    Judging from my pharmacy students id say 1 in 4 already registered as 'anxious'.
    Surely they know which pills to take to control it?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    Foxy said:

    MaxPB said:

    isam said:

    I’ve said many times that people on unemployment benefits should have them stopped after three months if they refuse to accept an unskilled job. Labour are proposing a weaker version of this, but at least it’s a step in the right direction

    Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job offers

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/6d684895-0c77-4ecc-8004-e443130ddcda?shareToken=adaf465543fbc57a3b3195895ec86ac7

    Anxiety claims for PIP will shoot through the roof.
    Judging from my pharmacy students id say 1 in 4 already registered as 'anxious'.
    Surely they know which pills to take to control it?
    I'd like to say yes, but...
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404
    Barnesian said:

    Justin Rose is on a roll. He was three shots down and has pulled them all back. Two holes to go.

    He lost on the final hole by 20".
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,811
    Battlebus said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I'm still a Labour member, and chair of my constituency party. I disagree with a number of current policies, in particular the large cut in foreign aid and the large increase in military spending, but I remain an active member for now. When the new party has had its first conference and clarified its position, and it's clear whether it has a reasonable chance of a significant share of the votes, I'll consider switching - but after 54 years in Labour it's not a decision to take casually.
    Would you consider accepting that military aid is normally foreign.
    Yes. But the nearly two thirds cut in foreign aid is largely non-military.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 80,218
    What's with the "fore right" after every european shot ?!
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    Just chucked 2 quid on the septics just in case. Got 25-1... Hope it's a loser as the yanks will be unbearable if it comes in...
  • TresTres Posts: 3,097

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    That’s just in your head. I looked at the previous 3 appeals from Thames Valley Police and they are all the same and don’t mention ethnicity.
    So when the fuck did they stop reporting ethnicity? Always used to be part of the requests for information.
    no-ones been arrested yet so there is nothing to report - you really are desperate to be upset about something aren't you?
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403

    Battlebus said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I'm still a Labour member, and chair of my constituency party. I disagree with a number of current policies, in particular the large cut in foreign aid and the large increase in military spending, but I remain an active member for now. When the new party has had its first conference and clarified its position, and it's clear whether it has a reasonable chance of a significant share of the votes, I'll consider switching - but after 54 years in Labour it's not a decision to take casually.
    Would you consider accepting that military aid is normally foreign.
    Yes. But the nearly two thirds cut in foreign aid is largely non-military.
    One of many reasons that I won't vote Labour too.

    Slashing foreign aid at the same time as Trump is collapsing so many worthwhile projects.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,222
    A second person has died in USA's latest gun outrage.

    Will they ever learn? Not in my lifetime it seems.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    Pulpstar said:

    What's with the "fore right" after every european shot ?!

    They keep slicing their shots?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    Tres said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    That’s just in your head. I looked at the previous 3 appeals from Thames Valley Police and they are all the same and don’t mention ethnicity.
    So when the fuck did they stop reporting ethnicity? Always used to be part of the requests for information.
    no-ones been arrested yet so there is nothing to report - you really are desperate to be upset about something aren't you?
    So you don't believe the police have any information about the alleged attackers?
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,222
    Kitty Donaldson
    @kitty_donaldson
    Never mind Andy Burnham, Steve Reed is clearly running. His red ‘Build, Baby, Build’ baseball caps are the Labour conference merch of choice.

    Video via ⁦@eleanormia


    https://x.com/kitty_donaldson/status/1972276168779784199

    He's 85/1.

    I may take a nibble.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 40,843

    MaxPB said:

    isam said:

    I’ve said many times that people on unemployment benefits should have them stopped after three months if they refuse to accept an unskilled job. Labour are proposing a weaker version of this, but at least it’s a step in the right direction

    Young people to lose benefits if they refuse job offers

    https://www.thetimes.com/article/6d684895-0c77-4ecc-8004-e443130ddcda?shareToken=adaf465543fbc57a3b3195895ec86ac7

    Anxiety claims for PIP will shoot through the roof.
    Judging from my pharmacy students id say 1 in 4 already registered as 'anxious'.
    Something mad like 50% of Gen Z get anxious when they have to answer a phone call. It's completely ridiculous how unprepared for real life they are. Time away from social media and working a manual job on a farm in Australia would do them some good. I know it did for me...
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 80,218
    Oh fuck off
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I'm still a Labour member, and chair of my constituency party. I disagree with a number of current policies, in particular the large cut in foreign aid and the large increase in military spending, but I remain an active member for now. When the new party has had its first conference and clarified its position, and it's clear whether it has a reasonable chance of a significant share of the votes, I'll consider switching - but after 54 years in Labour it's not a decision to take casually.
    Would you consider accepting that military aid is normally foreign.
    Yes. But the nearly two thirds cut in foreign aid is largely non-military.
    One of many reasons that I won't vote Labour too.

    Slashing foreign aid at the same time as Trump is collapsing so many worthwhile projects.
    Isn't it complicated though? We are running a huge budget deficit and have been for decades. We have enough issues at home. And yes it's great to do good around the world, and in terms of impact it's probably true that a pound overseas goes further than at home but...
    There is a suspicion that some nations neglect their own when overseas aid is being spent to improve the lives of their citizens (e.g. India launching tickets into space while recieving overseas aid).
    But then again helping overseas may reduce migration.
    So it's really complex.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,214
    edited September 28
    Pulpstar said:

    Oh fuck off

    Yep. The bastards.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,700
    Slightly want Trump's Ugly America to win

    Sorry
  • TresTres Posts: 3,097

    Tres said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    That’s just in your head. I looked at the previous 3 appeals from Thames Valley Police and they are all the same and don’t mention ethnicity.
    So when the fuck did they stop reporting ethnicity? Always used to be part of the requests for information.
    no-ones been arrested yet so there is nothing to report - you really are desperate to be upset about something aren't you?
    So you don't believe the police have any information about the alleged attackers?
    Oh put your pitchforks away
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403

    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I'm still a Labour member, and chair of my constituency party. I disagree with a number of current policies, in particular the large cut in foreign aid and the large increase in military spending, but I remain an active member for now. When the new party has had its first conference and clarified its position, and it's clear whether it has a reasonable chance of a significant share of the votes, I'll consider switching - but after 54 years in Labour it's not a decision to take casually.
    Would you consider accepting that military aid is normally foreign.
    Yes. But the nearly two thirds cut in foreign aid is largely non-military.
    One of many reasons that I won't vote Labour too.

    Slashing foreign aid at the same time as Trump is collapsing so many worthwhile projects.
    Isn't it complicated though? We are running a huge budget deficit and have been for decades. We have enough issues at home. And yes it's great to do good around the world, and in terms of impact it's probably true that a pound overseas goes further than at home but...
    There is a suspicion that some nations neglect their own when overseas aid is being spent to improve the lives of their citizens (e.g. India launching tickets into space while recieving overseas aid).
    But then again helping overseas may reduce migration.
    So it's really complex.
    We no longer give foreign aid to India, indeed last year we made a profit on our FCO investments there.

    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/britain-makes-a-profit-on-the-aid-it-gives-to-india-for-first-time/articleshow/122865713.cms
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,214
    edited September 28
    Leon said:

    Slightly want Trump's Ugly America to win

    Sorry

    That’s worthy of a flag.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    Foxy said:

    Foxy said:

    Battlebus said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I'm still a Labour member, and chair of my constituency party. I disagree with a number of current policies, in particular the large cut in foreign aid and the large increase in military spending, but I remain an active member for now. When the new party has had its first conference and clarified its position, and it's clear whether it has a reasonable chance of a significant share of the votes, I'll consider switching - but after 54 years in Labour it's not a decision to take casually.
    Would you consider accepting that military aid is normally foreign.
    Yes. But the nearly two thirds cut in foreign aid is largely non-military.
    One of many reasons that I won't vote Labour too.

    Slashing foreign aid at the same time as Trump is collapsing so many worthwhile projects.
    Isn't it complicated though? We are running a huge budget deficit and have been for decades. We have enough issues at home. And yes it's great to do good around the world, and in terms of impact it's probably true that a pound overseas goes further than at home but...
    There is a suspicion that some nations neglect their own when overseas aid is being spent to improve the lives of their citizens (e.g. India launching tickets into space while recieving overseas aid).
    But then again helping overseas may reduce migration.
    So it's really complex.
    We no longer give foreign aid to India, indeed last year we made a profit on our FCO investments there.

    https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/uk/britain-makes-a-profit-on-the-aid-it-gives-to-india-for-first-time/articleshow/122865713.cms
    It was probably a poor example, I accept that.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 40,843
    If the US win Trump is going to be insufferable.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,214
    MaxPB said:

    If the US win Trump is going to be insufferable.

    Unlike his usual self.
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,725
    I did say on here last night that is winning the last hole was critical. But I think it's gone
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,725
    Aberg wins!!!!
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,725
    Top from de Chambrau. Comeback from 5 down
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,222

    Leon has been banned for treason.

    Unlike his usual reasons for a ban.

  • MaxPB said:

    If the US win Trump is going to be insufferable.

    When they lose, Trump will deport Keegan Bradley, their non-playing captain (more like a manager, who decides who plays whom).
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    My dad always used to reckon that the snooker was a bit fixed to ensure some excitement. So if player A got too far ahead, they would inexplicably lose a few to keep the interest up. Never thought I'd see it in the Ryder cup.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404
    We just need one tied game to keep it.
    Three tied games currently in play.
  • DoctorGDoctorG Posts: 194

    My dad always used to reckon that the snooker was a bit fixed to ensure some excitement. So if player A got too far ahead, they would inexplicably lose a few to keep the interest up. Never thought I'd see it in the Ryder cup.

    Its helping Sky keep viewers .... kind of like Scotland scoring first against Brazil or Spennymoor town scoring first against Arsenal in the FA cup
  • Leon has been banned for treason.

    What's he done now? :lol:
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,179
    I mean if you think about it golf is a stupid game anyway.
  • Leon said:

    I wonder if the reason American golf fans get over-excited, is because Americans actually get very few chances to shout "USA! USA!" in major international team sports events

    In the wanky Yankee team sports they really care about, NFL, baseball, basketball, they have almost no international competition, so no one else cares, because these sports are shit

    That leaves soccer, where they aren't that good, the Olympics, and Ryder Cup Golf

    Golf? I'd rather watch semen dry...
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,222

    Keir Starmer
    @Keir_Starmer
    ·
    59m

    Day one: done

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1972387741322432620

    ===

    That comes across as day one: got through that, phew.
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 33,632
    edited September 28

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Same for anywhere there is a big event. Back when we actually had an oil industry, the Oil Show every other year in Aberdeen meant you couldn't get a hotel room for under £400. People used to stay in Dundee or Perth and have a taxi to take them to Aberdeen each day. On the alternate years when it was held in Stavanger, we used to fly in from Oslo or Bergen every morning and fly back in the evening as there were usually no rooms available in Stavanger and if there were you were looking at the thick end of £800 per night.

    It is still like that in Stavanger as they actually have a thriving oil and gas industry. Not so Aberdeen.
    If I could cope with strangers staying in my place, I could make an absolute fortune by putting my flat in central Manchester on Airbnb every time there is a concert or football match in Manchester.
    On a similar theme we make regular use of the Just Park app - people renting out their drives around concert and event venues. It is a brilliant idea, simple but really well executed.
  • MaxPB said:

    If the US win Trump is going to be insufferable.

    'going to be'?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475


    Keir Starmer
    @Keir_Starmer
    ·
    59m

    Day one: done

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1972387741322432620

    ===

    That comes across as day one: got through that, phew.

    How can he find time to post that when the Ryder Cup is going south? Treason.
  • Tres said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    That’s just in your head. I looked at the previous 3 appeals from Thames Valley Police and they are all the same and don’t mention ethnicity.
    So when the fuck did they stop reporting ethnicity? Always used to be part of the requests for information.
    no-ones been arrested yet so there is nothing to report - you really are desperate to be upset about something aren't you?
    So you don't believe the police have any information about the alleged attackers?
    I believe the police will release the amount of information they deem necessary to advance the investigation with help from the public without risking prejudicing any future court case. Until they have suspects in custody they will be extremely careful about what they release.

    This is good policing. Compare and contrast with some of the cockups that have been made in the past by releasing too much information too early resulting in wrongful arrests or vigilante attacks.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404


    Keir Starmer
    @Keir_Starmer
    ·
    59m

    Day one: done

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1972387741322432620

    ===

    That comes across as day one: got through that, phew.

    "Patriot renewal" is such a crap phrase.
    Imagine being a Labour canvasser. "We believe in patriot renewal". Yer what?

  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 32,781

    I mean if you think about it golf is a stupid game anyway.

    I think it's very much a player-y sport not really a spectator-y sport. Especially live. I really can't see the point.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,222
    Barnesian said:


    Keir Starmer
    @Keir_Starmer
    ·
    59m

    Day one: done

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1972387741322432620

    ===

    That comes across as day one: got through that, phew.

    "Patriot renewal" is such a crap phrase.
    Imagine being a Labour canvasser. "We believe in patriot renewal". Yer what?

    I think it's "patriotic renewal" to be honest, but the point still stands.

  • Leon said:

    Slightly want Trump's Ugly America to win

    Sorry

    Why on earth would you
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475

    I mean if you think about it golf is a stupid game anyway.

    I think it's very much a player-y sport not really a spectator-y sport. Especially live. I really can't see the point.
    I was thinking that earlier. Do you grab a seat in the stands at the 14th and then just wait until the players come through? I can see at the US Open or the masters it would be a lot more players but here it's rather limited.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,676

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    Becoming increasingly MAGA.
    Weird for the UK.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 124,003
    edited September 28
    When America do win the Ryder Cup this evening then all golf chat on PB will be banned and we will pretend golf doesn't exist.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404

    When America do win the Ryder Cup this evening then all golf chat on PB will be banned and we wll pretend golf doesn't exist.

    Nah. We're going to retain it. But it might be a draw. 10s on Betfair is value I think.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 32,781

    Barnesian said:


    Keir Starmer
    @Keir_Starmer
    ·
    59m

    Day one: done

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1972387741322432620

    ===

    That comes across as day one: got through that, phew.

    "Patriot renewal" is such a crap phrase.
    Imagine being a Labour canvasser. "We believe in patriot renewal". Yer what?

    I think it's "patriotic renewal" to be honest, but the point still stands.

    It couldn't be just patriotism because that would be wrong. Rule Britannia and retired colonels and jam. And actually acting in the national interest. It has to be a 'new thing'. Like New Labour - these little add-on words subvert the original meaning. Patriotism would be to tell the ICJ to piss off over Chagos. RENEWAL Patriotism is to pay £30bn in order to give it to a completely unrelated country. You're not allowed to be patriotic. You can be RENEWAL patriotic instead.

    Thankfully this Government is so thuddingly stupid that the concept will probably be lucky to last the conference.
  • GallowgateGallowgate Posts: 20,995

    Barnesian said:


    Keir Starmer
    @Keir_Starmer
    ·
    59m

    Day one: done

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1972387741322432620

    ===

    That comes across as day one: got through that, phew.

    "Patriot renewal" is such a crap phrase.
    Imagine being a Labour canvasser. "We believe in patriot renewal". Yer what?

    I think it's "patriotic renewal" to be honest, but the point still stands.

    It couldn't be just patriotism because that would be wrong. Rule Britannia and retired colonels and jam. And actually acting in the national interest. It has to be a 'new thing'. Like New Labour - these little add-on words subvert the original meaning. Patriotism would be to tell the ICJ to piss off over Chagos. RENEWAL Patriotism is to pay £30bn in order to give it to a completely unrelated country. You're not allowed to be patriotic. You can be RENEWAL patriotic instead.

    Thankfully this Government is so thuddingly stupid that the concept will probably be lucky to last the conference.
    You need to get over Chagos, it literally doesn’t matter.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,676

    When America do win the Ryder Cup this evening then all golf chat on PB will be banned and we will pretend golf doesn't exist.

    Suits me, win or lose.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,676
    Barnesian said:


    Keir Starmer
    @Keir_Starmer
    ·
    59m

    Day one: done

    https://x.com/Keir_Starmer/status/1972387741322432620

    ===

    That comes across as day one: got through that, phew.

    "Patriot renewal" is such a crap phrase.
    Imagine being a Labour canvasser. "We believe in patriot renewal". Yer what?

    Missile system upgrade ?

    Not sure why it's a doorstep issue though.
  • Never in doubt!
  • Retained it

    What a competition
  • londonpubmanlondonpubman Posts: 3,725
    Yes!!!!!!
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 56,493
    Well played Lowrie. Pressure must have been immense.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,256
    What a hero Shane is. So pleased that it was him that won it.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,179
    If you think about it golf is a brilliant game really.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 40,367

    Never in doubt!

    ...
  • tlg86 said:

    What a hero Shane is. So pleased that it was him that won it.

    Yup, him telling crowd yesterday 'Fuck you' was the greatest moment in Ryder Cup history.
  • You should be ashamed @Leon for wanting Trump's US to win
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 56,007
    Spin on that, Donald...
  • Lowry cannot speak.

    He's an emotional wreck.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 80,218
    Biggest 1/2 of the week :D
  • Lowry cannot speak.

    He's an emotional wreck.

    We should all be so proud of him putting that putt away
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 56,007

    When America do win the Ryder Cup this evening then all golf chat on PB will be banned and we will pretend golf doesn't exist.

    We thank you for your service...
  • When America do win the Ryder Cup this evening then all golf chat on PB will be banned and we will pretend golf doesn't exist.

    We thank you for your service...
    I don't mind taking one for the team.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 56,007
    There's going to be some mighty repairs required on that 18th after Lowry pogoed across it...
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,214

    I mean if you think about it golf is a stupid game anyway.

    I think it's very much a player-y sport not really a spectator-y sport. Especially live. I really can't see the point.
    I was thinking that earlier. Do you grab a seat in the stands at the 14th and then just wait until the players come through? I can see at the US Open or the masters it would be a lot more players but here it's rather limited.
    Same issue with watching cycling or the boat race live. A few seconds of action and that’s it.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404

    Lowry cannot speak.

    He's an emotional wreck.

    We should all be so proud of him putting that putt away
    Six foot putt. Henley's was a ten foot putt which he missed by six inches.
  • Hearing Donald Trump is about to put a 50% tariff on Europe's Ryder Cup points.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,475
    TimS said:

    I mean if you think about it golf is a stupid game anyway.

    I think it's very much a player-y sport not really a spectator-y sport. Especially live. I really can't see the point.
    I was thinking that earlier. Do you grab a seat in the stands at the 14th and then just wait until the players come through? I can see at the US Open or the masters it would be a lot more players but here it's rather limited.
    Same issue with watching cycling or the boat race live. A few seconds of action and that’s it.
    We 'watched' the Brownlees in the 2012 triathlon. Or rather we saw a few blurry cyclists s couple of times before finding a pub to watch on TV ..
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404
    edited September 28
    65% chance of a draw yet 5.5 on Betfair
    35% chance of a win
  • CookieCookie Posts: 16,200
    Get in.
    The Ryder Cup must be the most exciting competition in any sport. A pity it's not on free telly any more. (I haven't seen it on Sky for 20 years but the last time I saw it the coverage was technically very good but utterly packing in charm, as if it was done by people who weren't particularly interested in golf, like, well - remember Peter Alliss? The opposite of that.)
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,700
    Dammit

    Joking!
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,179
    TimS said:

    I mean if you think about it golf is a stupid game anyway.

    I think it's very much a player-y sport not really a spectator-y sport. Especially live. I really can't see the point.
    I was thinking that earlier. Do you grab a seat in the stands at the 14th and then just wait until the players come through? I can see at the US Open or the masters it would be a lot more players but here it's rather limited.
    Same issue with watching cycling or the boat race live. A few seconds of action and that’s it.
    The one F1 GP I went to I had a brilliant view of pole position at Silverstone and then had literally no idea what was happening as I saw some blurs scream past my limited field of vision. I actually had a better time during the practice sessions where I could move around and have different views of the action, as opposed to the fixed seat for race day.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 40,367
    Cookie said:

    I haven't seen it on Sky for 20 years but the last time I saw it the coverage was technically very good but utterly packing in charm, as if it was done by people who weren't particularly interested in golf

    Like their NFL coverage. Or their F1 coverage. Or Cricket.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 80,218
    I've got a fiver on the tie, and my recent sports betting record has been dire...
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 27,256
    Cookie said:

    Get in.
    The Ryder Cup must be the most exciting competition in any sport. A pity it's not on free telly any more. (I haven't seen it on Sky for 20 years but the last time I saw it the coverage was technically very good but utterly packing in charm, as if it was done by people who weren't particularly interested in golf, like, well - remember Peter Alliss? The opposite of that.)

    Ewen Murray is one of the best sports broadcasters around.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,404
    Barnesian said:

    65% chance of a draw yet 5.5 on Betfair
    35% chance of a win

    Ignore. Bollocks.
  • Scott_xP said:

    Cookie said:

    I haven't seen it on Sky for 20 years but the last time I saw it the coverage was technically very good but utterly packing in charm, as if it was done by people who weren't particularly interested in golf

    Like their NFL coverage. Or their F1 coverage. Or Cricket.
    Even cricket is less boring than golf!
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,700

    If you think about it golf is a brilliant game really.

    Always loved golf. So authentically sporting. Proper sport

    Hahahah up yours Donald
  • The sporting event that left me an emotional wreck for ages was the 2019 cricket world cup final.

    That was before the super over which destroyed me.
  • CookieCookie Posts: 16,200

    Scott_xP said:

    Cookie said:

    I haven't seen it on Sky for 20 years but the last time I saw it the coverage was technically very good but utterly packing in charm, as if it was done by people who weren't particularly interested in golf

    Like their NFL coverage. Or their F1 coverage. Or Cricket.
    Even cricket is less boring than golf!
    I can accept people not finding cricket or golf exciting. Sport ia, after all, a bit silly. But I am baffled by people who find cricket and golf unexciting yet get excited by football.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 34,663
    Leon said:

    The Collective PB Autists have no Theory of Mind

    Discuss with bar charts, then dismiss with a weird, awkward gesture

    "Autist" is a word seldom used these days to describe autistic people as it seen as offensive.

    "Collective PB Autists have no Theory of Mind" is deeply scornful. You are using autism again as a disparaging insult.
Sign In or Register to comment.