Skip to content

Soon we could see the Tories fifth in the polling – politicalbetting.com

123578

Comments

  • RogerRoger Posts: 21,192
    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 88,071
    edited September 28
    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 7,315
    edited September 28
    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Being a member of a party is so 20th century.
  • OmniumOmnium Posts: 12,028

    ...

    Andy Burnham says Keir Starmer has created a "climate of fear" within Labour

    “How do we reconnect with the public if an MP loses the whip for trying to protect disability benefits or scrap two-child benefit cap… when debate is closed”

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972345892192841863

    Stabbing in the front.

    At least long term gilt values might stabilise now Burnham has sh@t the next Prime Minister bed.

    Stop digging Andy.
    His moment in the Sun, or wherever the dark illustrations of his irrational self-love have featured will have cost the country a bean or two. I hope he has the decency to pay. Lets see gilt yields say +0.02% - oh just a few hundred million.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,510
    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 124,019
    edited September 28

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
  • Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    The horror....of having to stay in Premier Inn.
  • Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    The horror....of having to stay in Premier Inn.
    I know, I stayed at the Novotel on Broad Street.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,230

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Are they in the bedroom now with you?
  • Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I am a member of the Tory Party, I first joined in 1997, a few days after the election as a callow 18 year old.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,230

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I quite like Nandy. I don't know why Lab generally seem so down on her.
  • Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Are they in the bedroom now with you?
    One's in my office at home, one in the loft, and one is in my actual office at work, in the cupboard.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,230

    Poppy Coburn
    @kafkaswife
    ·
    5h
    Overheard at Labour conference:

    “We do the doorknocking, get told to f— off… it’s a daily ‘f— off’ now because everyone hates us”

    https://x.com/kafkaswife/status/1972283073292362024
  • Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Same for anywhere there is a big event. Back when we actually had an oil industry, the Oil Show every other year in Aberdeen meant you couldn't get a hotel room for under £400. People used to stay in Dundee or Perth and have a taxi to take them to Aberdeen each day. On the alternate years when it was held in Stavanger, we used to fly in from Oslo or Bergen every morning and fly back in the evening as there were usually no rooms available in Stavanger and if there were you were looking at the thick end of £800 per night.

    It is still like that in Stavanger as they actually have a thriving oil and gas industry. Not so Aberdeen.
  • Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Same for anywhere there is a big event. Back when we actually had an oil industry, the Oil Show every other year in Aberdeen meant you couldn't get a hotel room for under £400. People used to stay in Dundee or Perth and have a taxi to take them to Aberdeen each day. On the alternate years when it was held in Stavanger, we used to fly in from Oslo or Bergen every morning and fly back in the evening as there were usually no rooms available in Stavanger and if there were you were looking at the thick end of £800 per night.

    It is still like that in Stavanger as they actually have a thriving oil and gas industry. Not so Aberdeen.
    If I could cope with strangers staying in my place, I could make an absolute fortune by putting my flat in central Manchester on Airbnb every time there is a concert or football match in Manchester.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 88,071
    edited September 28
    Treasury Minister Torsten Bell calls Ed Davey a "fat bloke in a wetsuit"

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972354466545586266

    I thought fat shaming was a no no in progressive circles.
  • CatManCatMan Posts: 3,464
    Ratters said:

    DougSeal said:

    Andy_JS said:

    It's possible the ID cards petition will reach 25% of the number of votes Labour polled at the general election relatively soon.

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/730194

    Why are you so obsessed by this petition? It’s not even in the top 3 by numbers since they were introduced. And by some margin.
    PETITION SIGNATURES STATUS REQUEST

    Revoke Article 50 and re… 6,103,056 Closed

    EU Referendum Rules tri… 4,150,262 Closed

    Call a General Election (… 3,084,714 Closed

    Do not introduce Digital I… 2,300,000 Open
    ... So what you're telling me is it's the largest petition ever that isn't just sore losers complaining about an election vote they lost?
    If I remember correctly one of the Brexit ones was actually set up by a Leave supporter before the vote
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 40,860


    Poppy Coburn
    @kafkaswife
    ·
    5h
    Overheard at Labour conference:

    “We do the doorknocking, get told to f— off… it’s a daily ‘f— off’ now because everyone hates us”

    https://x.com/kafkaswife/status/1972283073292362024

    Feels like last year knocking on doors for the Tories.
  • Anyone else think if Europe get to 14 points they should concede the rest of the matches to just piss off the obnoxious Yanks?
  • Rory had another knuckle dragger thrown out....$750 and get yourself thrown out at such an early stage. Sounds more stupid than paying £400 to stay in a Premier Inn to attend Tory Party conference.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,510

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Are they in the bedroom now with you?
    One's in my office at home, one in the loft, and one is in my actual office at work, in the cupboard.
    David Cameron is in the closet. You heard it here first!
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 88,071
    edited September 28

    Anyone else think if Europe get to 14 points they should concede the rest of the matches to just piss off the obnoxious Yanks?

    I think they should just go all Jon Daly and use cans of beer for tees, swigging from whiskey bottles between shots. Show them the level of respect due.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 124,019
    edited September 28

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Are they in the bedroom now with you?
    One's in my office at home, one in the loft, and one is in my actual office at work, in the cupboard.
    David Cameron is in the closet. You heard it here first!
    Cupboard, not closet.

    The closet has clothes in it.

    Such as morning suit when I have to chair a board meeting.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 15,584

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I am a member of the Tory Party, I first joined in 1997, a few days after the election as a callow 18 year old.
    There is an irrational surd about party membership; in some way it commits you however mildly to the concept of party X being right and parties not-X being in some way wrong. Patently this can't be true or in any sense a complete idea, and any party worthy of having sensible members at all joins with all other decent parties in wanting what Iris Murdoch would call 'The Sovereignty of Good', or catholic social theology calls 'the common good'.

    So I am left in the uncomfortable position of thinking that multi party democracy is the best available way, that party membership is essential to its health but there are good reasons for not joining one. So I never have.

    More pragmatically, I would not want to join any party that would want me as a member, and the thought of sitting in meetings with other party members waiting to go home and pretending to like it freezes the blood. Like, for those who know the horrific inner life of the Church of England, a never ending deanery synod.
  • Anyone else think if Europe get to 14 points they should concede the rest of the matches to just piss off the obnoxious Yanks?

    I think they should just go all Jon Daly and use cans of beer for tees, swigging from whiskey bottles between shots. Show them the level of respect due.
    I like that idea.
  • Europe shitting the bed here.
  • NigelbNigelb Posts: 81,684
    Neptune Energy confirms massive lithium resources in Germany

    https://www.electrive.com/2025/09/25/neptune-energy-confirms-massive-lithium-resources-in-germany/
    Neptune Energy, a major oil and gas company, has just confirmed resources of 43 million tons of lithum carbonate (LCE) in the Altmark region in Germany. With huge potential for commercial extraction, it could become one of the key production nodes for battery technology in Europe.
  • A mega-dinghy carrying 125 migrants successfully crossed the English Channel yesterday, breaking a new record for a single vessel.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-28/uk-sees-biggest-ever-migrant-arrival-as-boats-get-bigger

    Obviously didn't get the memo about no more than 84 per boat.

    Does seem like a change of tactics, they go weekends and lots of people all at once.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 23,510
    algarkirk said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I am a member of the Tory Party, I first joined in 1997, a few days after the election as a callow 18 year old.
    There is an irrational surd about party membership; in some way it commits you however mildly to the concept of party X being right and parties not-X being in some way wrong. Patently this can't be true or in any sense a complete idea, and any party worthy of having sensible members at all joins with all other decent parties in wanting what Iris Murdoch would call 'The Sovereignty of Good', or catholic social theology calls 'the common good'.

    So I am left in the uncomfortable position of thinking that multi party democracy is the best available way, that party membership is essential to its health but there are good reasons for not joining one. So I never have.

    More pragmatically, I would not want to join any party that would want me as a member, and the thought of sitting in meetings with other party members waiting to go home and pretending to like it freezes the blood. Like, for those who know the horrific inner life of the Church of England, a never ending deanery synod.
    You know it is a bad party meeting when the Treasurer's report is the highlight.
  • Europe shitting the bed here.

    Spurs will be on the phone for copyright infringement.
  • isamisam Posts: 42,734
    edited September 28

    A mega-dinghy carrying 125 migrants successfully crossed the English Channel yesterday, breaking a new record for a single vessel.

    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-09-28/uk-sees-biggest-ever-migrant-arrival-as-boats-get-bigger

    Obviously didn't get the memo about no more than 84 per boat.

    Does seem like a change of tactics, they go weekends and lots of people all at once.

    These chaps just don't play by the rules do they? Next thing you know they'll be working on the black market, even though they haven't got ID cards
  • algarkirk said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I am a member of the Tory Party, I first joined in 1997, a few days after the election as a callow 18 year old.
    There is an irrational surd about party membership; in some way it commits you however mildly to the concept of party X being right and parties not-X being in some way wrong. Patently this can't be true or in any sense a complete idea, and any party worthy of having sensible members at all joins with all other decent parties in wanting what Iris Murdoch would call 'The Sovereignty of Good', or catholic social theology calls 'the common good'.

    So I am left in the uncomfortable position of thinking that multi party democracy is the best available way, that party membership is essential to its health but there are good reasons for not joining one. So I never have.

    More pragmatically, I would not want to join any party that would want me as a member, and the thought of sitting in meetings with other party members waiting to go home and pretending to like it freezes the blood. Like, for those who know the horrific inner life of the Church of England, a never ending deanery synod.
    You know it is a bad party meeting when the Treasurer's report is the highlight.
    I went to a meeting where the apologies for non attendance was the highlight.
  • boulayboulay Posts: 7,521

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Getting visions of the Alan Partridge episode with his biggest fan. You don’t have a tattoo of his face on your chest do you?
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 88,071
    edited September 28
    I wonder if the players are that bothered by the noise why they don't wear noise cancelling headphones / earbuds.

    The couple of tour pros I grew up regularly practiced with headphones on (and this was years ago when they were bulky).
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 68,230
    MaxPB said:


    Poppy Coburn
    @kafkaswife
    ·
    5h
    Overheard at Labour conference:

    “We do the doorknocking, get told to f— off… it’s a daily ‘f— off’ now because everyone hates us”

    https://x.com/kafkaswife/status/1972283073292362024

    Feels like last year knocking on doors for the Tories.
    Life comes fast at you these days...
  • boulay said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Getting visions of the Alan Partridge episode with his biggest fan. You don’t have a tattoo of his face on your chest do you?
    No.
  • solarflaresolarflare Posts: 4,179
    edited September 28

    I wonder if the players are that bothered by the noise why they don't wear noise cancelling headphones / earbuds.

    The couple of tour pros I grew up regularly practiced with headphones on (and this was years ago when they were bulky).

    Reminds me of Gerwyn Price wearing ear defenders during a world championship darts match.
  • Treasury Minister Torsten Bell calls Ed Davey a "fat bloke in a wetsuit"

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972354466545586266

    I thought fat shaming was a no no in progressive circles.

    Is Ed Davey particularly fat anyway? There is a suspicion Bell was groping for any short adjective to make the sentence flow.

    More importantly, is Torsten Bell left or right-handed? The mic suggests one; his watch the other.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,219
    edited September 28

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I quite like Nandy. I don't know why Lab generally seem so down on her.
    I like her too. 3 years ago I was at a Labour city event (prawn cocktail offensive kind of thing), and the front benchers were doing the circulating act at the drinks. I made a point of seeking out Lisa because she was interested in devolution, and had by far the most engaging chat of the evening. Like chatting to a new colleague at leaving drinks or a school mum after a few wines at the kids’ camping night. The other good chat was with Lammy. Proper remainer. Some of the others were a little too demure and on-message.
  • TimSTimS Posts: 16,219

    Treasury Minister Torsten Bell calls Ed Davey a "fat bloke in a wetsuit"

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972354466545586266

    I thought fat shaming was a no no in progressive circles.

    Is Ed Davey particularly fat anyway? There is a suspicion Bell was groping for any short adjective to make the sentence flow.

    More importantly, is Torsten Bell left or right-handed? The mic suggests one; his watch the other.
    His micro-insult is a gift to Davey.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 16,334
    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,901

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    It would be interesting to see what happens to the polls if/when immigration moves down the list of key issues. Don’t laugh. It has happened before.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485
    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 80,218

    Europe shitting the bed here.

    Following this as closely and as well as Amorim does a penalty shootout.
  • Pulpstar said:

    Europe shitting the bed here.

    Following this as closely and as well as Amorim does a penalty shootout.
    Same.

    If we lose this then Europe's golfer should be forced to swim back.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 16,334

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,486

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    Outside of the terminally online who have bought into US culture wars hook line and sinker, I'm not sure Reform can rely on its anti-immigration supporters mapping across to support for other US conservative issues.
  • TimS said:

    Treasury Minister Torsten Bell calls Ed Davey a "fat bloke in a wetsuit"

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972354466545586266

    I thought fat shaming was a no no in progressive circles.

    Is Ed Davey particularly fat anyway? There is a suspicion Bell was groping for any short adjective to make the sentence flow.

    More importantly, is Torsten Bell left or right-handed? The mic suggests one; his watch the other.
    His micro-insult is a gift to Davey.
    Idiotic thing for Bell to say
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 7,315
    DougSeal said:

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    It would be interesting to see what happens to the polls if/when immigration moves down the list of key issues. Don’t laugh. It has happened before.
    Were it not for the boats, I think it would. Even with pre-Boriswave numbers. Say, 250k net per year. Perhaps Starmer's boat scheme will work. Perhaps not.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,901

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,901

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    The police haven’t reported on ethnicity. What do you expect the BBC to do?
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 16,334
    Ratters said:

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    Outside of the terminally online who have bought into US culture wars hook line and sinker, I'm not sure Reform can rely on its anti-immigration supporters mapping across to support for other US conservative issues.
    That is, however, all the Reform UK have. There’s no careful analysis of the specific problems facing the UK. They’re just importing US Republican/MAGA talking points. It’s like the Reform UK councillor storming out of a local council meeting because they didn’t mention Charlie Kirk.
  • Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    1 in 3 sounds high even if miscarriages are included in the figures. I wonder if it is accurate or if some AI ML has taken a 1 per cent rate and scaled it up over 30 years to reach 30 per cent or 1 in 3.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 37,845
    "Don't underestimate peril for Labour, says Burnham"

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cn0xzpngj5xo
  • ydoethurydoethur Posts: 75,396

    TimS said:

    Treasury Minister Torsten Bell calls Ed Davey a "fat bloke in a wetsuit"

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972354466545586266

    I thought fat shaming was a no no in progressive circles.

    Is Ed Davey particularly fat anyway? There is a suspicion Bell was groping for any short adjective to make the sentence flow.

    More importantly, is Torsten Bell left or right-handed? The mic suggests one; his watch the other.
    His micro-insult is a gift to Davey.
    Idiotic thing for Bell to say
    Bell ends up making a fool of himself.
  • Luckyguy1983Luckyguy1983 Posts: 32,781
    TimS said:

    Treasury Minister Torsten Bell calls Ed Davey a "fat bloke in a wetsuit"

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972354466545586266

    I thought fat shaming was a no no in progressive circles.

    Is Ed Davey particularly fat anyway? There is a suspicion Bell was groping for any short adjective to make the sentence flow.

    More importantly, is Torsten Bell left or right-handed? The mic suggests one; his watch the other.
    His micro-insult is a gift to Davey.
    On recent form, Davey will issue a statement shortly agreeing with him.
  • ydoethur said:

    TimS said:

    Treasury Minister Torsten Bell calls Ed Davey a "fat bloke in a wetsuit"

    https://x.com/PolitlcsUK/status/1972354466545586266

    I thought fat shaming was a no no in progressive circles.

    Is Ed Davey particularly fat anyway? There is a suspicion Bell was groping for any short adjective to make the sentence flow.

    More importantly, is Torsten Bell left or right-handed? The mic suggests one; his watch the other.
    His micro-insult is a gift to Davey.
    Idiotic thing for Bell to say
    Bell ends up making a fool of himself.
    Get your own gags,

    https://www1.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2025/09/02/bell-ends-up-as-the-next-chancellor/
  • Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I am a member of the Tory Party, I first joined in 1997, a few days after the election as a callow 18 year old.
    You poor sod!
  • Europe shitting the bed here.

    As predicted on pb (ok, as copied from the Racing Post) this morning.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 16,334

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    That’s just in your head. I looked at the previous 3 appeals from Thames Valley Police and they are all the same and don’t mention ethnicity.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    Not necessarily blaming the BBC as I say in my first sentence. It’s just so blindingly obvious yet again that ethnicity is being withheld despite what was said after Liverpool.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 16,334

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    1 in 3 sounds high even if miscarriages are included in the figures. I wonder if it is accurate or if some AI ML has taken a 1 per cent rate and scaled it up over 30 years to reach 30 per cent or 1 in 3.
    No, it’s a well-reported figure. I think some men don’t appreciate how common abortion is, how much it is a part of many women’s lives.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    The police haven’t reported on ethnicity. What do you expect the BBC to do?
    Read what i said- ‘or maybe it’s just what thevpolic3 are saying’.

    I thought things had changed when the Liverpool driver was reported as white really quickly.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 7,315
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    The police haven’t reported on ethnicity. What do you expect the BBC to do?
    Wasn't there a policy announcement on exactly this topic a couple of months ago?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The BBC will be reporting what the police said. The police want people to report if they saw anything. They don’t want the public rushing to conclusions. So they don’t report ethnicity. They focus on when/where.
    Apart from when it’s a white suspect, time and again.
    That’s just in your head. I looked at the previous 3 appeals from Thames Valley Police and they are all the same and don’t mention ethnicity.
    So when the fuck did they stop reporting ethnicity? Always used to be part of the requests for information.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 16,334

    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    Not necessarily blaming the BBC as I say in my first sentence. It’s just so blindingly obvious yet again that ethnicity is being withheld despite what was said after Liverpool.
    Here’s another recent appeal from the same police force:

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-after-fatal-road-traffic-collision---cholsey/

    Is it blindingly obvious that ethnicity has been withheld in this case? Stop being paranoid.
  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,486
    If I was nearly 60, leading a political party while looking after a disabled son and wife with MS, I'd probably find it difficult to stay in great shape.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485

    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    Not necessarily blaming the BBC as I say in my first sentence. It’s just so blindingly obvious yet again that ethnicity is being withheld despite what was said after Liverpool.
    Here’s another recent appeal from the same police force:

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-after-fatal-road-traffic-collision---cholsey/

    Is it blindingly obvious that ethnicity has been withheld in this case? Stop being paranoid.
    With respect that’s totally different.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 56,496
    There is considerably less blue on that board than there was when I stopped for tea. Should still be ok but not quite the massacre that looked on the cards earlier.
  • Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    Are you really that dense?

    The difference is that with the Liverpool outrage they had suspect in immediate custody (even though it didn't stop the terminally racist blaming it on Muslims) so could confirm ethnicity pretty easily.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    Are you really that dense?

    The difference is that with the Liverpool outrage they had suspect in immediate custody (even though it didn't stop the terminally racist blaming it on Muslims) so could confirm ethnicity pretty easily.
    No, in the aftermath of Liverpool it was claimed that the policy had changed, when it clearly hadn’t.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,901
    edited September 28

    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    Not necessarily blaming the BBC as I say in my first sentence. It’s just so blindingly obvious yet again that ethnicity is being withheld despite what was said after Liverpool.
    Here’s another recent appeal from the same police force:

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-after-fatal-road-traffic-collision---cholsey/

    Is it blindingly obvious that ethnicity has been withheld in this case? Stop being paranoid.
    With respect that’s totally different.
    Edit: Mia culpa - didn’t notice the photo
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,816
    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    This was an attack in the dead of night in a churchyard. I guess positive ethnic identification might be challenging, and that this might be one for DNA.
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485
    edited September 28
    DougSeal said:

    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    DougSeal said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    This is the police report. Reading it, WFT else are the BBC supposed to say? You want them to speculate about something this serious?

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/
    Not necessarily blaming the BBC as I say in my first sentence. It’s just so blindingly obvious yet again that ethnicity is being withheld despite what was said after Liverpool.
    Here’s another recent appeal from the same police force:

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-after-fatal-road-traffic-collision---cholsey/

    Is it blindingly obvious that ethnicity has been withheld in this case? Stop being paranoid.
    With respect that’s totally different.
    Okay, here’s another, somewhat similar, albeit less serious, one from the same force -

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/witness-appeal-following-stalking-incident--oxford/
    Again, with respect, an image of the suspect is totally different.

    To be clear, I am not suggesting anything about the ethnicity or ethnicities, I just find it really odd. If it was five white guys say so. If it was five black, or brown or whatever. It seems to me to be deliberately leaving information out for no good reason.
  • rcs1000rcs1000 Posts: 61,672

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    1 in 3 sounds high even if miscarriages are included in the figures. I wonder if it is accurate or if some AI ML has taken a 1 per cent rate and scaled it up over 30 years to reach 30 per cent or 1 in 3.
    I think it's 1-in-3 over their lifetime.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    Are you really that dense?

    The difference is that with the Liverpool outrage they had suspect in immediate custody (even though it didn't stop the terminally racist blaming it on Muslims) so could confirm ethnicity pretty easily.
    Then just say that

    "At the moment we have no idea of the ethnicity of the alleged criminals, or any other reliable descriptions"

    How hard is that? Just say it. Stop with the wanky non-speak
  • Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    It looks as if the Thames Valley police report and appeal being summarised by the BBC is aimed specifically at one person, the bystander who tried to intervene. There'd be no point telling her what she already knows, and it makes sense to keep things vague so they can quickly exclude fantasists and mischief-makers who would not know the details.
  • Andy_JS said:

    It would be amusing if the Digital ID is not regarded as suitable identification to present at the polling station on election day 2029.

    We shouldn't need to show an ID to vote in elections. We didn't until about 3 years ago and there were almost never any problems.
    And of course don't mention postal voters.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,423
    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    Possibly, for some reason I can't fathom, the woman who was gang-raped in a churchyard hasn't provided a detailed description of the attackers yet? Possibly she's a little sad. Maybe a bit ditzy. Hard to think of a good reason.

    And being outraged while writing "she witnessed her own gang rape" is a new low, even for you.
  • StillWatersStillWaters Posts: 11,074
    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    Are you really that dense?

    The difference is that with the Liverpool outrage they had suspect in immediate custody (even though it didn't stop the terminally racist blaming it on Muslims) so could confirm ethnicity pretty easily.
    Then just say that

    "At the moment we have no idea of the ethnicity of the alleged criminals, or any other reliable descriptions"

    How hard is that? Just say it. Stop with the wanky non-speak
    What impact would that have on the likelihood of potential witnesses to come forward? I have no idea but I suspect that these appeals are specifically crafted for that purpose.
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 33,118
    edited September 28
    rcs1000 said:

    Reform UK becoming increasingly anti-abortion: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/reform-anti-abortion-us-movement-farage-b2832865.html

    Approx 1 in 3 women in the UK have an abortion at some point.

    1 in 3 sounds high even if miscarriages are included in the figures. I wonder if it is accurate or if some AI ML has taken a 1 per cent rate and scaled it up over 30 years to reach 30 per cent or 1 in 3.
    I think it's 1-in-3 over their lifetime.
    Maybe, but even so I'd wonder if they are averaging repeat patients with never-customers. It might be correct but is it meaningful? My mate and I go to 10 football matches a season – he does 20 and I watch it on telly.
  • AnthonyTAnthonyT Posts: 221
    What is known so far of the relationship between Larry Ellison of Oracle and BLair - Oracle gives loads of money to his foundation - Blair lobbies the govt for a scheme which will benefit Oracle and a company in which the Blair family are invested - has a certain whiff of the Cameron / Greensill affair.

    We seem to have ended up combining the worst aspects of overreaching state power and crony capitalism with the interests of the individual citizen utterly disregarded, other than as a product to be sold for the benefit of a rich few.

  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,423
    boulay said:

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Loads of MPs don't even seem to go to their own parties conferences these days .
    It's bloody expensive, I went to the 2014 Tory conference, and I wasn't able to buy any shoes for a year, Premier Inns were charging £300 a night.

    At least I got three signed cardboard cut outs of Dave.
    Getting visions of the Alan Partridge episode with his biggest fan. You don’t have a tattoo of his face on your chest do you?
    There is some new Partridge on the way :

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_gbZ5lBBi3A

    (For some reason they took down the original trailer - it explained he was 'crowdfunding' a new documentary and 100% not taking bribes to read out stuff on camera....)
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719
    In the interests of balance, it's worth noting there is good news ahead for Skyr Toolmakersson

    Illegal arrivals are down by around 50% to the EU, YOY. Whatever Frontex are doing - forcing slavers to take the migrants in Libya, sinking boats off Greece - is working. This will soon, surely, feed through to the boat crisis in the UK, and the pressure will lessen
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,423
    Nigelb said:

    Neptune Energy confirms massive lithium resources in Germany

    https://www.electrive.com/2025/09/25/neptune-energy-confirms-massive-lithium-resources-in-germany/
    Neptune Energy, a major oil and gas company, has just confirmed resources of 43 million tons of lithum carbonate (LCE) in the Altmark region in Germany. With huge potential for commercial extraction, it could become one of the key production nodes for battery technology in Europe.

    Elon's not-a-nazi-salute is ever more a masterstroke.
  • Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    Are you really that dense?

    The difference is that with the Liverpool outrage they had suspect in immediate custody (even though it didn't stop the terminally racist blaming it on Muslims) so could confirm ethnicity pretty easily.
    Then just say that

    "At the moment we have no idea of the ethnicity of the alleged criminals, or any other reliable descriptions"

    How hard is that? Just say it. Stop with the wanky non-speak
    What impact would that have on the likelihood of potential witnesses to come forward? I have no idea but I suspect that these appeals are specifically crafted for that purpose.
    Yet another of the curses of Permanews.

    Assuming these scumbags, whoever they are, are brought to trial, we will know their identity soon enough.

    In the meantime, getting the case investigated as quickly and calmly as possible has to be a higher priority than satisfying purient curiosity, especially shit-stirring purient curiosity.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719
    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    Possibly, for some reason I can't fathom, the woman who was gang-raped in a churchyard hasn't provided a detailed description of the attackers yet? Possibly she's a little sad. Maybe a bit ditzy. Hard to think of a good reason.

    And being outraged while writing "she witnessed her own gang rape" is a new low, even for you.
    Bollocks

    If you go back in time, as many have done on social media today, in olden days the police had no trouble in releasing this info very quickly after an alleged crime such as rape. "White, five foot seven, medium build", "black, 5 foot 10, athletic", "weak, 4 foot ten, a centrist Dad on a forum mainly for twats, apart from that one cool dude"

    I do not believe this was because they were Awful Racists Back Then. It's because this is basic police work: be honest, warn the public
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,423

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The police statement is online :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    No mention of a description - what do you want the BBC to say? Have a go at the police - but I'm not sure it's the BBC's fault.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719

    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    Are you really that dense?

    The difference is that with the Liverpool outrage they had suspect in immediate custody (even though it didn't stop the terminally racist blaming it on Muslims) so could confirm ethnicity pretty easily.
    Then just say that

    "At the moment we have no idea of the ethnicity of the alleged criminals, or any other reliable descriptions"

    How hard is that? Just say it. Stop with the wanky non-speak
    What impact would that have on the likelihood of potential witnesses to come forward? I have no idea but I suspect that these appeals are specifically crafted for that purpose.
    Yet another of the curses of Permanews.

    Assuming these scumbags, whoever they are, are brought to trial, we will know their identity soon enough.

    In the meantime, getting the case investigated as quickly and calmly as possible has to be a higher priority than satisfying purient curiosity, especially shit-stirring purient curiosity.
    My fucking God. Don't you think you might JUST feel differently if you were a young woman in Banbury? Like, you might want to know who is out there doing gang rapes??
  • AnthonyT said:

    What is known so far of the relationship between Larry Ellison of Oracle and BLair - Oracle gives loads of money to his foundation - Blair lobbies the govt for a scheme which will benefit Oracle and a company in which the Blair family are invested - has a certain whiff of the Cameron / Greensill affair.

    We seem to have ended up combining the worst aspects of overreaching state power and crony capitalism with the interests of the individual citizen utterly disregarded, other than as a product to be sold for the benefit of a rich few.

    Looks can be misleading and if anything, the relationship is probably the other way round. Blair has been pushing ID cards for decades.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719
    The Collective PB Autists have no Theory of Mind

    Discuss with bar charts, then dismiss with a weird, awkward gesture
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719
    Europe could now easily lose this. Wild
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,811

    Roger said:

    Do we have any Labour members on PB any more? I think Sandy Rentool is one but there used to be several. We used to ger regular updates from all the Parties during their conference. But this year they seem conspicuous by their absence. I'm not even sure Nick Palmer is there.

    Yes, I'm a party member. I joined when John Smith was leader. And like several other PB Labourites, I voted Nandy in the leadership ballot.

    It would be interesting to know how many current members of each party frequent PB.
    I'm still a Labour member, and chair of my constituency party. I disagree with a number of current policies, in particular the large cut in foreign aid and the large increase in military spending, but I remain an active member for now. When the new party has had its first conference and clarified its position, and it's clear whether it has a reasonable chance of a significant share of the votes, I'll consider switching - but after 54 years in Labour it's not a decision to take casually.
  • ohnotnowohnotnow Posts: 5,423
    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    Possibly, for some reason I can't fathom, the woman who was gang-raped in a churchyard hasn't provided a detailed description of the attackers yet? Possibly she's a little sad. Maybe a bit ditzy. Hard to think of a good reason.

    And being outraged while writing "she witnessed her own gang rape" is a new low, even for you.
    Bollocks

    If you go back in time, as many have done on social media today, in olden days the police had no trouble in releasing this info very quickly after an alleged crime such as rape. "White, five foot seven, medium build", "black, 5 foot 10, athletic", "weak, 4 foot ten, a centrist Dad on a forum mainly for twats, apart from that one cool dude"

    I do not believe this was because they were Awful Racists Back Then. It's because this is basic police work: be honest, warn the public
    That still assumes they had a description from the victim of this hideous crime. If the police have one and have withheld it - that's an issue for them to explain. If, by some remote inexplicable chance, the woman who has been gang raped in a churchyard hasn't given one - then that's really quite different.

    The official police statement is at :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    Maybe they're useless, feckless woke fools. I have no idea. But stirring up hysteria on the back of, at the risk of repeating the real issue, a woman being gang raped by men in a churchyard, seems quite repulsive.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 65,719
    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    ohnotnow said:

    Leon said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    It's gone entirely viral, so if anything the lack of description is making everything worse

    They MUST have descriptions! Unless the poor woman is in a coma, she witnesssed her own gang rape. Report what she says. This is an insult to us all

    And if you can't report it, then tell us why, and that's fine. It is the endless lying and obfuscating that stirs the pot
    Possibly, for some reason I can't fathom, the woman who was gang-raped in a churchyard hasn't provided a detailed description of the attackers yet? Possibly she's a little sad. Maybe a bit ditzy. Hard to think of a good reason.

    And being outraged while writing "she witnessed her own gang rape" is a new low, even for you.
    Bollocks

    If you go back in time, as many have done on social media today, in olden days the police had no trouble in releasing this info very quickly after an alleged crime such as rape. "White, five foot seven, medium build", "black, 5 foot 10, athletic", "weak, 4 foot ten, a centrist Dad on a forum mainly for twats, apart from that one cool dude"

    I do not believe this was because they were Awful Racists Back Then. It's because this is basic police work: be honest, warn the public
    That still assumes they had a description from the victim of this hideous crime. If the police have one and have withheld it - that's an issue for them to explain. If, by some remote inexplicable chance, the woman who has been gang raped in a churchyard hasn't given one - then that's really quite different.

    The official police statement is at :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    Maybe they're useless, feckless woke fools. I have no idea. But stirring up hysteria on the back of, at the risk of repeating the real issue, a woman being gang raped by men in a churchyard, seems quite repulsive.
    Oh STFU

    I didn't bring up this story, @turbotubbs did

    Nor am I roiling the waters on social media, I am on PB

    Have a Hobnob, and chill out, knobhead
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 53,403
    carnforth said:

    Moldova appears to be rejecting the pro-Russian party:

    https://pv.cec.md/preliminare

    It depends on which districts have reported surely?
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 20,485
    ohnotnow said:

    Another classic of reporting from the BBC, or maybe it’s just what the police are saying?

    https://bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cly622k0jm4o

    So a group of ‘men’? No details on ethnicity, so assume non white then? (Pace Liverpool car outrage).

    The police statement is online :

    https://www.thamesvalley.police.uk/news/thames-valley/news/2025/september/22-09-25/appeal-in-connection-with-a-rape--banbury/

    No mention of a description - what do you want the BBC to say? Have a go at the police - but I'm not sure it's the BBC's fault.
    FFS read what I wrote. I explicitly suggested it might be the police.
Sign In or Register to comment.