She may be gone but the Truss legacy still endures – politicalbetting.com
Chris Philp says Nigel Farage's spending plans are "Liz Truss on steroids".The only snag is he was No2 in the Treasury in her government and gave the mini-Budget "9.5 out of 10".www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/top-to…
During a recent trip to the US, where I spoke with many members of what I suppose are the global financial elite, I was heartened and proud to see that Britain had furnished the world with a new gold standard. The phrase "Truss event" has become a global shorthand for any kind of enormously stupid policy error quickly reversed after a bond market rout. So beautiful to see us once again a commanding figure on the world stage.
During a recent trip to the US, where I spoke with many members of what I suppose are the global financial elite, I was heartened and proud to see that Britain had furnished the world with a new gold standard. The phrase "Truss event" has become a global shorthand for any kind of enormously stupid policy error quickly reversed after a bond market rout. So beautiful to see us once again a commanding figure on the world stage.
The “cabbage vs insane political figure/policy” is also now a universally understood part of the discourse of politics. UK tabloid humour has gone international it seems!
London still firmly resisting the Reform tide even if Labour down, the Tory vote also holding up better in London than elsewhere with FON and Green vote particularly up in the capital
Seventh. Like Truss in the list of best PMs since 2010.
I think you should have gone with 'lower quartile' - premierships such as Truss are fleeting almost quantum events. I believe that current Tory political thinking is that we may have had several million momentary PMs - and therefore Truss may well only be in the bottom handful.
London still firmly resisting the Reform tide even if Labour down, the Tory vote also holding up better in London than elsewhere with FON and Green vote particularly up in the capital
Full marks for positive thinking! Whether you look at this as a doubling of the share or an increase of 10 points, this doesn't much look to me like 'resisting the Reform tide'.
London still firmly resisting the Reform tide even if Labour down, the Tory vote also holding up better in London than elsewhere with FON and Green vote particularly up in the capital
"Firmly resisting the Reform tide" = "Overtaking the Tories"
During a recent trip to the US, where I spoke with many members of what I suppose are the global financial elite, I was heartened and proud to see that Britain had furnished the world with a new gold standard. The phrase "Truss event" has become a global shorthand for any kind of enormously stupid policy error quickly reversed after a bond market rout. So beautiful to see us once again a commanding figure on the world stage.
The “cabbage vs insane political figure/policy” is also now a universally understood part of the discourse of politics. UK tabloid humour has gone international it seems!
Lettuce, not cabbage! Lettuce Liz looks to be joining Reform, fingers crossed.
London still firmly resisting the Reform tide even if Labour down, the Tory vote also holding up better in London than elsewhere with FON and Green vote particularly up in the capital
I would imagine Reform will happily take a 10% swing to them in one of the least Reform friendly parts of the country.
If they do, it would be pretty conclusive proof that RefUK is a Bialystock and Bloom production.
Deets of that Ipsos poll are:
34% say that former PM Liz Truss defecting to Reform would make them view the party more negatively. 13% say they would view the party more positively. 38% who wouldn't care- I wonder how many of those are because they can't view Reform more negatively than the currently do?
Seventh. Like Truss in the list of best PMs since 2010.
I think you should have gone with 'lower quartile' - premierships such as Truss are fleeting almost quantum events. I believe that current Tory political thinking is that we may have had several million momentary PMs - and therefore Truss may well only be in the bottom handful.
Bear in mind that we have had only six prime ministers officially since 2010.
London still firmly resisting the Reform tide even if Labour down, the Tory vote also holding up better in London than elsewhere with FON and Green vote particularly up in the capital
erm reform moving into second place by adding ten percent is resisting the reform tide?
I don’t understand why people consider it a bad thing that Labour are tackling Reform on immigration. At the end of the day you can be as woke as you like but immigration is still a concern. You can try to convince the population that we have a “moral duty” to accept all these people but you’re not going to win. It’s a much better left wing position to make sure that those we do accept and treated well and chosen wisely and appropriately.
It’s also a much better left wing position to improve the economy so we can better look after and support those already here.
Frankly I trust Labour much more than Reform to do this without ripping up our rights and the economy in the process.
It could be done at policy level without the totally unnecessary dogwhistle language and nastiness, which is classic home office and just encourages others to ramp up the rhetoric further.
What language are you referring to?
“Nation of strangers” “City the size of Birmingham” “That’s not control, it’s chaos” “An immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse”
All in this morning’s speech, and all calculated to paint a picture of an invasion and a system out of control. They heighten people’s fears rather than reassuring them.
And Cooper invited journalists in to film migrants being forcibly deported back in February. Again, all part of the theatre of immigration policy. Not quite up there with Trump and his El Salvador prisons I grant you, but unnecessary and in my view self defeating.
It tells me Labour are serious about winning the next election. Getting immigration down and halting illegal immigration/asylum seeking is the only path for them to win and I think they've realised it, for now it's all talk though if they delivery on this agenda I'd make Labour favourites to win in 2029 and the Tories to be turned to dust by Reform.
If Labour out-Reform Reform, they may be in prime position to win the next election, but it will create a gap for a Cameroon-style party.
No I don't think it does, the market for those voters is quite small, the lefty types put off by this will move to the greens not the Tories. Fundamentally the British public has decisively moved against unlimited immigration, I don't think there's many votes for a party that pledges it in 2029.
I don't mean lefty types. There are lots of people who want immigration to be dealt with, but are still put off by the rhetoric.
I don't think there are. I've been in the Tory party on and off for 15 years or so and even the one nation types are fed up with immigration being so high. People who were reliable voters for Dave, voted remain etc... are now much closer to Nige than they are to Boris on immigration. The constant media reports on court rulings has really changed people's minds on it IMO. The Tory party, in theory, is about working hard and getting on in life, people see those court case results and it really makes them seem like our hospitality is being taken advantage of, it's been, IMO, the most radicalising of the immigration stories for the party. One of the reasons Kemi has jumped on the anti-ECHR bandwagon is because I think the party has realised this, but probably 3 years too late.
I'm talking about a hypothetical scenario in three years' time where Labour have successfully brought immigration down more than they're promising now. The issue won't have gone away, but it will have lost a bit of salience and some people will be put off by politicians 'banging on' about immigration, even if they personally would be happy with not letting anyone in.
There is a point there. Salience rises and falls partly based on media coverage but also partly based on the rate of change in net migration. It seems quite a volatile metric too.
The reason I don’t see salience falling this time is the basic visual impact of small boats, regardless of levels of legal immigration. They can effectively remove the “migrants in hotels” issue by clearing the backlog, but not the “migrants arriving on the beach”.
They can stop the boats by immediately deporting any arrivals to designated safe third countries. Labour are very slowly inching towards a new version of the Rwanda scheme, eventually they will announce something very similar to the Tory version and many of those people who called the scheme unworkable or inhumane will magically no longer be opposed. Give people no incentive to come illegally and they will stop coming illegally. The pull factor is the hotels, it's illegal work, it's our benefits system, it's our liberal society. To borrow a phrase, tolerance is extinction and Labour seems to have grasped that our culture is going extinct due to these arrivals.
Mayfair’s quite nice isn’t it? Wouldn’t mind living here. Big 3 bed flat, or maybe a townhouse south of Hanover Square
Don’t know why people knock london
Lots of good clothes shops. Pretty cafes. It’s v pleasant
Get on a boat and get to Dover illegally, then sue the government for not putting you in your choice of area. They'll give you a hotel room at a 4* in Mayfair eventually.
London still firmly resisting the Reform tide even if Labour down, the Tory vote also holding up better in London than elsewhere with FON and Green vote particularly up in the capital
erm reform moving into second place by adding ten percent is resisting the reform tide?
Given FON have Reform on 33% UK wide in their latest poll and 13% ahead of Labour, relatively yes
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own @bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
I don’t understand why people consider it a bad thing that Labour are tackling Reform on immigration. At the end of the day you can be as woke as you like but immigration is still a concern. You can try to convince the population that we have a “moral duty” to accept all these people but you’re not going to win. It’s a much better left wing position to make sure that those we do accept and treated well and chosen wisely and appropriately.
It’s also a much better left wing position to improve the economy so we can better look after and support those already here.
Frankly I trust Labour much more than Reform to do this without ripping up our rights and the economy in the process.
It could be done at policy level without the totally unnecessary dogwhistle language and nastiness, which is classic home office and just encourages others to ramp up the rhetoric further.
What language are you referring to?
“Nation of strangers” “City the size of Birmingham” “That’s not control, it’s chaos” “An immigration system that seems almost designed to permit abuse”
All in this morning’s speech, and all calculated to paint a picture of an invasion and a system out of control. They heighten people’s fears rather than reassuring them.
And Cooper invited journalists in to film migrants being forcibly deported back in February. Again, all part of the theatre of immigration policy. Not quite up there with Trump and his El Salvador prisons I grant you, but unnecessary and in my view self defeating.
It tells me Labour are serious about winning the next election. Getting immigration down and halting illegal immigration/asylum seeking is the only path for them to win and I think they've realised it, for now it's all talk though if they delivery on this agenda I'd make Labour favourites to win in 2029 and the Tories to be turned to dust by Reform.
If Labour out-Reform Reform, they may be in prime position to win the next election, but it will create a gap for a Cameroon-style party.
No I don't think it does, the market for those voters is quite small, the lefty types put off by this will move to the greens not the Tories. Fundamentally the British public has decisively moved against unlimited immigration, I don't think there's many votes for a party that pledges it in 2029.
I don't mean lefty types. There are lots of people who want immigration to be dealt with, but are still put off by the rhetoric.
I don't think there are. I've been in the Tory party on and off for 15 years or so and even the one nation types are fed up with immigration being so high. People who were reliable voters for Dave, voted remain etc... are now much closer to Nige than they are to Boris on immigration. The constant media reports on court rulings has really changed people's minds on it IMO. The Tory party, in theory, is about working hard and getting on in life, people see those court case results and it really makes them seem like our hospitality is being taken advantage of, it's been, IMO, the most radicalising of the immigration stories for the party. One of the reasons Kemi has jumped on the anti-ECHR bandwagon is because I think the party has realised this, but probably 3 years too late.
I'm talking about a hypothetical scenario in three years' time where Labour have successfully brought immigration down more than they're promising now. The issue won't have gone away, but it will have lost a bit of salience and some people will be put off by politicians 'banging on' about immigration, even if they personally would be happy with not letting anyone in.
There is a point there. Salience rises and falls partly based on media coverage but also partly based on the rate of change in net migration. It seems quite a volatile metric too.
The reason I don’t see salience falling this time is the basic visual impact of small boats, regardless of levels of legal immigration. They can effectively remove the “migrants in hotels” issue by clearing the backlog, but not the “migrants arriving on the beach”.
They can stop the boats by immediately deporting any arrivals to designated safe third countries. Labour are very slowly inching towards a new version of the Rwanda scheme, eventually they will announce something very similar to the Tory version and many of those people who called the scheme unworkable or inhumane will magically no longer be opposed. Give people no incentive to come illegally and they will stop coming illegally. The pull factor is the hotels, it's illegal work, it's our benefits system, it's our liberal society. To borrow a phrase, tolerance is extinction and Labour seems to have grasped that our culture is going extinct due to these arrivals.
I would send them somewhere seedy, run down and third rate. Clacton, Great Yarmouth and Skegness spring to mind.
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
I'm quite keen that Truss and Braverman should fail to find any political sunlight in the future. Much like Corbyn - allowed to wither.
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
During a recent trip to the US, where I spoke with many members of what I suppose are the global financial elite, I was heartened and proud to see that Britain had furnished the world with a new gold standard. The phrase "Truss event" has become a global shorthand for any kind of enormously stupid policy error quickly reversed after a bond market rout. So beautiful to see us once again a commanding figure on the world stage.
During a recent trip to the US, where I spoke with many members of what I suppose are the global financial elite, I was heartened and proud to see that Britain had furnished the world with a new gold standard. The phrase "Truss event" has become a global shorthand for any kind of enormously stupid policy error quickly reversed after a bond market rout. So beautiful to see us once again a commanding figure on the world stage.
Mandy Rice Davies would seem to apply.
Nah, at my work and in the wider industry ‘Trussed’ is the term, at my work ‘Trussed’ has replaced ‘stepmommed’ which has upset me greatly.
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own @bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
I think they will fail but make some sort of start. That will help when Reform come in, because they will be continuing something not facing an implacable wall of resistance.
I don't share the feeling expressed here today that Labour's position is recoverable. But it is nice that they're trying - that's democracy.
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
I'm quite keen that Truss and Braverman should fail to find any political sunlight in the future. Much like Corbyn - allowed to wither.
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
I'm quite keen that Truss and Braverman should fail to find any political sunlight in the future. Much like Corbyn - allowed to wither.
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
I'm quite keen that Truss and Braverman should fail to find any political sunlight in the future. Much like Corbyn - allowed to wither.
Sadly nobody cares what you're keen on.
Don't call me sadly.
I wonder though why you're being rude?
LuckyGuy is very loyal to Liz Truss, like I am to Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (pbuh).
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
During a recent trip to the US, where I spoke with many members of what I suppose are the global financial elite, I was heartened and proud to see that Britain had furnished the world with a new gold standard. The phrase "Truss event" has become a global shorthand for any kind of enormously stupid policy error quickly reversed after a bond market rout. So beautiful to see us once again a commanding figure on the world stage.
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
I'm quite keen that Truss and Braverman should fail to find any political sunlight in the future. Much like Corbyn - allowed to wither.
Sadly nobody cares what you're keen on.
Don't call me sadly.
I wonder though why you're being rude?
LuckyGuy is very loyal to Liz Truss, like I am to Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (pbuh).
Shush - I won't be able to give you my report as to who deserves death by barchart. I know Mike invested heavily in the machinery.
Balfour was still Leader of the Conservatives (or Unionists) at the time and remained so while out of parliament and through to the next two elections, which he also lost - though not before prompting a constitutional crisis by abusing the Tory majority in the Lords.
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
Lanyard wearers is excellent, I must say. I am one, though I'm also a former name badge wearer and "keeper of the PLB".
The civil service meme was disproven by Truss and Kwarteng. As long as you have the courage of your convictions, you can override them (and ignore the OBR) and enjoy the sunlit uplands.
Trump: "A friend of mine who is a businessman. Very very very top guy. Most of you would've heard of him. Highly neurotic. Brilliant businessman. Seriously overweight. And he takes the fat shot drug."
He's right. Family member was involved in advising companies about market pricing as each country has a different approach. Drug companies banked the US prices and then worked the margins in other markets. There is though a long term trend away from the US to Asia for development. So it may accelerate the trend to their and generics (India).
He's quite wrong about the likely effect of his executive order, though.
It's a policy (assuming the courts don't just tell him to do one) which - along with the massive funding cuts to US health research - which is likely to do serious only term damage to the US pharmaceutical industry industry.
While doing little to decrease drug costs.
It also ignores the fact that generics (90% of the US market) are already cheaper in the US than in Europe, and the fact that 50% of the price of prescriptions is goes into the pockets of Pharmacy Benefit Managers (largely owned by the US health insurance companies), not the pharmaceutical companies.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer.
As MiC found in their poll last week only a Johnson led Conservatives would now lead Reform and Labour, a Badenoch, Jenrick, even Cameron led Tories would still trail and a Sunak led Tories at best tie with Reform
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
Lanyard wearers is excellent, I must say. I am one, though I'm also a former name badge wearer and "keeper of the PLB".
The civil service meme was disproven by Truss and Kwarteng. As long as you have the courage of your convictions, you can override them (and ignore the OBR) and enjoy the sunlit uplands.
While a school governor, I was also (along with every teacher and TA, of course) a lanyard wearer. For whatever value I provided, my cost to the taxpayer was zero.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
And yet, she still believes that she is a misunderstood political giant.
Pop quiz: who was the last Tory leader (or ex-leader) to lose their seat at a general election?
Pierre Poilievre, I believe it was tipped at 14/1?
If we're going abroad then it would be Peter Dutton, I think?
My pedantry excludes Dutton as he was Leader of the Liberal Party whereas PP was a Conservative/Tory.
On that topic the Liberal Party will elect their new leader tomorrow after Dutton's defeat, Liberal MPs will choose between moderate Sussan Ley and hard right Angus Taylor in tomorrow's spill
What would be funny is if Farage said she was too loopy for them.
"I've always made it a golden rule not to let in people with a background in extremist parties so I'm afraid Liz's past association with the Lib Dems means we can't accept her."
Another former LibDem, Zack Polanski, is in the leadership election for the Green Party (of England and Wales), although he's not considered the favourite. I wonder if he would be as successful.
I was wondering that. Figured you more for one of the rude ones
ETA - but do you wear a lanyard? I don't, but I'm probably in the minority at work; I'm not sure what the official policy is or whether there is one, but no one has ever told me off for it.
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
Lanyard wearers is excellent, I must say. I am one, though I'm also a former name badge wearer and "keeper of the PLB".
The civil service meme was disproven by Truss and Kwarteng. As long as you have the courage of your convictions, you can override them (and ignore the OBR) and enjoy the sunlit uplands.
While a school governor, I was also (along with every teacher and TA, of course) a lanyard wearer. For whatever value I provided, my cost to the taxpayer was zero.
It's a great way to describe office workers in a slightly derogatory manner, and cuts across private and public. Though it's a bit inaccurate because they are designed to come apart under pressure, so they're not banned in hospitals and construction sites etc.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29%, with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
Lanyard wearers is excellent, I must say. I am one, though I'm also a former name badge wearer and "keeper of the PLB".
The civil service meme was disproven by Truss and Kwarteng. As long as you have the courage of your convictions, you can override them (and ignore the OBR) and enjoy the sunlit uplands.
While a school governor, I was also (along with every teacher and TA, of course) a lanyard wearer. For whatever value I provided, my cost to the taxpayer was zero.
It's a great way to describe office workers in a slightly derogatory manner, and cuts across private and public. Though it's a bit inaccurate because they are designed to come apart under pressure, so they're not banned in hospitals and construction sites etc.
And anyone working at height makes extensive use of lanyards.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Ant Middleton, a useless minor celebrity, is planning to stand for Reform UK.
I know but you embody their won't do attitude perfectly. Overly officious, attached to bureaucracy, think you know best even when you're completely wrong. If I could sum up the civil service into a single person, it would be you.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29% with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
Happy to be wrong. What would you prefer him doing though? PM or London Mayor? Ponder it for a while and consider that the electorate is other people much like you. I'm not sure you'll be so certain that I'm wrong.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Ant Middleton, a useless minor celebrity, is planning to stand for Reform UK.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29% with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
Happy to be wrong. What would you prefer him doing though? PM or London Mayor? Ponder it for a while and consider that the electorate is other people much like you. I'm not sure you'll be so certain that I'm wrong.
Tory leader, it is nationally where the Tories need to win back voters which the polls show only Boris can do, they don't need to win back London and any Tory candidate would still likely lose the capital and Mayoral race again
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29%, with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
I know but you embody their won't do attitude perfectly. Overly officious, attached to bureaucracy, think you know best even when you're completely wrong. If I could sum up the civil service into a single person, it would be you.
And yet, she still believes that she is a misunderstood political giant.
Pop quiz: who was the last Tory leader (or ex-leader) to lose their seat at a general election?
Pierre Poilievre, I believe it was tipped at 14/1?
If we're going abroad then it would be Peter Dutton, I think?
My pedantry excludes Dutton as he was Leader of the Liberal Party whereas PP was a Conservative/Tory.
The Australian "Liberal" party is a liberal party in name only.
The Australian Liberals are officially part of the International Democracy Union of right-wing parties, with other members of this alliance being the UK Tories and the Canadian Conservatives/Tories.
If Poliviere is a Tory then Dutton is also a Tory.
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
Lanyard wearers is excellent, I must say. I am one, though I'm also a former name badge wearer and "keeper of the PLB".
The civil service meme was disproven by Truss and Kwarteng. As long as you have the courage of your convictions, you can override them (and ignore the OBR) and enjoy the sunlit uplands.
While a school governor, I was also (along with every teacher and TA, of course) a lanyard wearer. For whatever value I provided, my cost to the taxpayer was zero.
It's a great way to describe office workers in a slightly derogatory manner, and cuts across private and public. Though it's a bit inaccurate because they are designed to come apart under pressure, so they're not banned in hospitals and construction sites etc.
More that it's useful to describe people who think they're more important than they are. Their lanyard embodies their persona, they see it as their super power, when they put it on in the morning they think they've become a different person who is better than everyone else. It is the best way to describe the civil service.
I know but you embody their won't do attitude perfectly. Overly officious, attached to bureaucracy, think you know best even when you're completely wrong. If I could sum up the civil service into a single person, it would be you.
A bit man not ball, don't you think, Max?
Not really, he fully admitted that when he was working in an advisory capacity for the government during COVID he worked against the government of the day and the agenda of ministers.
And yet, she still believes that she is a misunderstood political giant.
Pop quiz: who was the last Tory leader (or ex-leader) to lose their seat at a general election?
Pierre Poilievre, I believe it was tipped at 14/1?
If we're going abroad then it would be Peter Dutton, I think?
My pedantry excludes Dutton as he was Leader of the Liberal Party whereas PP was a Conservative/Tory.
The Australian "Liberal" party is a liberal party in name only.
The Australian Liberals are officially part of the International Democracy Union of right-wing parties, with other members of this alliance being the UK Tories and the Canadian Conservatives/Tories.
If Poliviere is a Tory then Dutton is also a Tory.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29% with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
Happy to be wrong. What would you prefer him doing though? PM or London Mayor? Ponder it for a while and consider that the electorate is other people much like you. I'm not sure you'll be so certain that I'm wrong.
Tory leader, it is nationally where the Tories need to win back voters which the polls show only Boris can do, they don't need to win back London and any Tory candidate would still likely lose the capital and Mayoral race again
Well it strikes me as a little unrealistic. If he could do it then fine, but I don't think he can. London Mayor he can do.
(Although he may be out of the game anyway - he's not looking great)
I think what's interesting is that parties representing over 70% of VI have now accepted that immigration is too high and needs to be brought down substantially and I think whichever party is best placed to deliver that will win in 2029. It won't be the Tories because the brand is irreparably damaged in immigration and frankly, no one will believe them even if they do mean what they say. That leaves Labour and Reform. Labour are actually in power which means they can deliver lower immigration using the apparatus of the state.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
Lanyard wearers is excellent, I must say. I am one, though I'm also a former name badge wearer and "keeper of the PLB".
The civil service meme was disproven by Truss and Kwarteng. As long as you have the courage of your convictions, you can override them (and ignore the OBR) and enjoy the sunlit uplands.
While a school governor, I was also (along with every teacher and TA, of course) a lanyard wearer. For whatever value I provided, my cost to the taxpayer was zero.
It's a great way to describe office workers in a slightly derogatory manner, and cuts across private and public. Though it's a bit inaccurate because they are designed to come apart under pressure, so they're not banned in hospitals and construction sites etc.
More that it's useful to describe people who think they're more important than they are. Their lanyard embodies their persona, they see it as their super power, when they put it on in the morning they think they've become a different person who is better than everyone else. It is the best way to describe the civil service.
Fair enough. I don't think the term will last because it probably applies to 50%+ of the working population, in a physical sense.
I wonder if I would work harder if I put my lanyard on when I'm WFH though...
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29% with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
Happy to be wrong. What would you prefer him doing though? PM or London Mayor? Ponder it for a while and consider that the electorate is other people much like you. I'm not sure you'll be so certain that I'm wrong.
Tory leader, it is nationally where the Tories need to win back voters which the polls show only Boris can do, they don't need to win back London and any Tory candidate would still likely lose the capital and Mayoral race again
Well it strikes me as a little unrealistic. If he could do it then fine, but I don't think he can. London Mayor he can do.
(Although he may be out of the game anyway - he's not looking great)
Complete gap otherwise.
He has done both jobs and Tories only care about where he can most boost them electorally, which is national leader again
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer.
As MiC found in their poll last week only a Johnson led Conservatives would now lead Reform and Labour, a Badenoch, Jenrick, even Cameron led Tories would still trail and a Sunak led Tories at best tie with Reform
I was wondering that. Figured you more for one of the rude ones
ETA - but do you wear a lanyard? I don't, but I'm probably in the minority at work; I'm not sure what the official policy is or whether there is one, but no one has ever told me off for it.
I do wear a lanyard when in the office. Occasionally I have a rainbow lanyard.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29%, with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29% with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
Happy to be wrong. What would you prefer him doing though? PM or London Mayor? Ponder it for a while and consider that the electorate is other people much like you. I'm not sure you'll be so certain that I'm wrong.
Tory leader, it is nationally where the Tories need to win back voters which the polls show only Boris can do, they don't need to win back London and any Tory candidate would still likely lose the capital and Mayoral race again
Well it strikes me as a little unrealistic. If he could do it then fine, but I don't think he can. London Mayor he can do.
(Although he may be out of the game anyway - he's not looking great)
Complete gap otherwise.
He has done both jobs and Tories only care about where he can most boost them electorally, which is national leader again
Well yes - I guess that's true.
You'll forgive me if I suggest that such narrowness is part of why I'm no longer a Tory party member. Once upon a time other matters mattered.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Boris is cooked in London after Brexit, better would be for Cleverly to be Tory candidate for London Mayor and bring back Boris as Leader of the Conservative Party before the next GE as the Tories best hope to see off Farage and Starmer
I think rather the opposite - Boris could be elected once again as London Mayor, but no chance nationally.
Well you are wrong.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29%, with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
And yet, she still believes that she is a misunderstood political giant.
Pop quiz: who was the last Tory leader (or ex-leader) to lose their seat at a general election?
Pierre Poilievre, I believe it was tipped at 14/1?
If we're going abroad then it would be Peter Dutton, I think?
My pedantry excludes Dutton as he was Leader of the Liberal Party whereas PP was a Conservative/Tory.
The Australian "Liberal" party is a liberal party in name only.
The Australian Liberals are officially part of the International Democracy Union of right-wing parties, with other members of this alliance being the UK Tories and the Canadian Conservatives/Tories.
If Poliviere is a Tory then Dutton is also a Tory.
The Tories desperately need to select a brilliant candidate for the London Mayorality, and for Reform to select a useless minor celebrity who will decide half way through the campaign that they can't be bothered.
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Ant Middleton, a useless minor celebrity, is planning to stand for Reform UK.
I'd say he's probably not a minor celeb, but I still think he's a beatable candidate.
I know but you embody their won't do attitude perfectly. Overly officious, attached to bureaucracy, think you know best even when you're completely wrong. If I could sum up the civil service into a single person, it would be you.
A bit man not ball, don't you think, Max?
Not really, he fully admitted that when he was working in an advisory capacity for the government during COVID he worked against the government of the day and the agenda of ministers.
The government asked me for my input. I gave that input. That input sometimes disagreed with what the government was doing. What's the point of being asked for your input to then just be a yesman?
Comments
* at last, a proper bit of blue-on-turquoise attack action
* the huge benefit of being true
♡ best not to remind us all of the Truss weeks.
But the best effort for a while.
But he is right and while it might be embarrassing for him, he can at least argue that he saw the implosion first-hand so is well-placed to comment.
https://www.newstatesman.com/politics/uk-politics/2025/04/would-reform-be-mad-to-accept-liz-truss
https://www.ipsos.com/en-uk/one-third-britons-say-they-would-view-reform-uk-more-negatively-if-liz-truss-were-join-party
Westminster Voting Intention [London]:
LAB: 30% (-13)
RFM: 19% (+10)
CON: 17% (-4)
LDM: 16% (+5)
GRN: 15% (+5)
Via @FindoutnowUK, 4-8 May.
Changes w/ GE2024.
(Apologies @Luckyguy1983 )
Deets of that Ipsos poll are:
34% say that former PM Liz Truss defecting to Reform would make them view the party more negatively. 13% say they would view the party more positively. 38% who wouldn't care- I wonder how many of those are because they can't view Reform more negatively than the currently do?
I was meaning in the UK, to clarify.
Don’t know why people knock london
Lots of good clothes shops. Pretty cafes. It’s v pleasant
Police investigating fire at Keir Starmer’s north London home
A fire damaged the door of the prime minister’s £2 million home early this morning. No one was injured
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/crime/article/keir-starmer-fire-north-london-home-nsc7vk7sj
At 3 G&Ts the ranting will begin.
I think what they're going to find is the same institutional resistance the Tories faced, the same civil servants like our own @bondegezou who is clearly against this and I'm sure were he able to would frustrate all attempts by ministers to bring immigration down. These self satisfied lanyard wearers in the public sector will over reach, force the government to fail as they did with the Tories time and again then we'll end up with a Reform majority.
Labour will first need to deal with internal dissenters within the civil service and start purging these people or they, like the Tories, will be doomed to failure as they frustrate, delay and block ministers from implementing policies to bring immigration down, deport illegal immigrants and asylum seekers to stop the boats.
https://bsky.app/profile/ballotbox.scot/post/3loou6c7u622t
I don't share the feeling expressed here today that Labour's position is recoverable. But it is nice that they're trying - that's democracy.
I wonder though why you're being rude?
I would still say the best idea is to give Boris a thorough sheep shearing (and dip) and take a punt on the Bojo magic reminding people of the good times.
Balfour was still Leader of the Conservatives (or Unionists) at the time and remained so while out of parliament and through to the next two elections, which he also lost - though not before prompting a constitutional crisis by abusing the Tory majority in the Lords.
The civil service meme was disproven by Truss and Kwarteng. As long as you have the courage of your convictions, you can override them (and ignore the OBR) and enjoy the sunlit uplands.
https://x.com/trussliz/status/1921849325853745189?s=61&t=LYVEHh2mqFy1oUJAdCfe-Q
See my posts from earlier today.
https://vf.politicalbetting.com/discussion/comment/5204502#Comment_5204502
It's a policy (assuming the courts don't just tell him to do one) which - along with the massive funding cuts to US health research - which is likely to do serious only term damage to the US pharmaceutical industry industry.
While doing little to decrease drug costs.
It also ignores the fact that generics (90% of the US market) are already cheaper in the US than in Europe, and the fact that 50% of the price of prescriptions is goes into the pockets of Pharmacy Benefit Managers (largely owned by the US health insurance companies), not the pharmaceutical companies.
Apart from all that, well done, Donald.
As MiC found in their poll last week only a Johnson led Conservatives would now lead Reform and Labour, a Badenoch, Jenrick, even Cameron led Tories would still trail and a Sunak led Tories at best tie with Reform
For whatever value I provided, my cost to the taxpayer was zero.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_Liberal_Party_of_Australia_leadership_election
ETA - but do you wear a lanyard? I don't, but I'm probably in the minority at work; I'm not sure what the official policy is or whether there is one, but no one has ever told me off for it.
Boris failed to win in London even in 2019, nationally however MiC found last week a Johnson led Conservative Party would be on 26%, up 5% from where they are with Kemi. Reform would be on 23%, down 6% from their current 29%, with Labour unchanged on 22% and the LDs down 1% to 15%
https://www.moreincommon.org.uk/media/rpahhzfk/more-in-common-post-election-briefing-3.pdf (p48)
Ant McPartlin would be noteworthy.
A mathematician Pope going up against a machine god superintelligence is the most cyberpunk thing ever.
https://x.com/WKCosmo/status/1921633591441703218
The Australian Liberals are officially part of the International Democracy Union of right-wing parties, with other members of this alliance being the UK Tories and the Canadian Conservatives/Tories.
If Poliviere is a Tory then Dutton is also a Tory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_Democracy_Union
Liberal is not a leftwing term, even if its been embraced by many who abhor liberal economics.
(Although he may be out of the game anyway - he's not looking great)
Complete gap otherwise.
I wonder if I would work harder if I put my lanyard on when I'm WFH though...
You'll forgive me if I suggest that such narrowness is part of why I'm no longer a Tory party member. Once upon a time other matters mattered.