Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

It’s a stunning performance by Reform – politicalbetting.com

24567

Comments

  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,082
    Dopermean said:

    Seems doubtful that their vetting will have improved but surely it would be more reasonable to hope that it hasn't. It seems that people will only learn by lived experience, if even then, sadly they'll have to experience that voting Reform will mean a collapse in local services, incompetence and farce.

    Problem that is exactly what we are seeing now from labour and conservative councils
  • ManOfGwentManOfGwent Posts: 158

    Here's a thought

    If Farage and Reform continue their successes this time next year Farage could be running Wales.!!!

    Largest party, but the new electoral system will mean Labour and Plaid coalition, as intended.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,328
    One possible strategy is Bobby J could bring Lowe in as shadow Home Sec and try and outflank Farage to his right.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    Very eloquent. The British state is now failing on every level - we can all see it with our own eyes on our own streets. It can’t even police our borders and protect British people from hostile foreign invaders - state failure doesn’t get more basic than that

    So we need an absolute reset from top to bottom. A peaceful revolution and a total rethink

    The only party offering that, by definition, must be a new outsider party. They may well fail - who knows, it doesn’t look good - but the voters are now desperate

    Reform are the right party at the right time
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,630
    Leon said:

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    Saying such things is just fucking stupid at this point - but then, it is you talking

    Farage is a politician. In what possible universe - outside of your miniature brain - is he “useless” at politics given the course of British history this last decade? He’s started or harnessed TWO parties and used both to change the course of our politics very dramatically. Yours is a laughable perspective. Childishly dim
    Well Farage will never get the Rejoin/Liberal Left/Atheist vote but you know what? I think he can live with that.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,974

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 121,770
    edited May 2
    Pulpstar said:

    One possible strategy is Bobby J could bring Lowe in as shadow Home Sec and try and outflank Farage to his right.

    I know the Tories are planning on going big on Farage following Trump’s orders to take back Shamima Begum.
  • viewcodeviewcode Posts: 24,423
    edited May 2
    BBC Council count at 4:10pm
    • Reform UK: 520 councillors, 520 councillors gained
    • Liberal Democrat: 268 councillors, 110 councillors gained
    • Conservative: 214 councillors, 510 councillors lost
    • Independent: 68 councillors, 19 councillors lost
    • Labour: 59 councillors, 132 councillors lost
    • Green: 59 councillors, 32 councillors gained
    Source: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,873

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Yup, Labour (and the Tories) need to hit the pause button on immigration tomorrow including no more new asylum seekers and deportations of existing ones. Suspend the HRA for the next 4 years and get them all out of the country, no more article 8, no more boat arrivals, no more minimum wage workers bringing 5 dependents with them.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,301
    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    Once again you confuse wining votes with being good at politics.

    BoZo won lots of votes. He was fucking useless.

    Trump won lots of votes. He's senile (and a bit mad)

    Nigel Fucking Farage wins votes and then delivers fuck all

    You are welcome to him
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,328
    REF
    522
    522
    (Reform UK: 522 councillors, 522 councillors gained)

    LD
    271
    110
    (Liberal Democrat: 271 councillors, 110 councillors gained)

    CON
    214
    512
    (Conservative: 214 councillors, 512 councillors lost)

    IND
    68
    19
    (Independent: 68 councillors, 19 councillors lost)

    LAB
    59
    132
    (Labour: 59 councillors, 132 councillors lost)

    GRN
    59
    32
    (Green: 59 councillors, 32 councillors gained)
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,974
    Pulpstar said:

    One possible strategy is Bobby J could bring Lowe in as shadow Home Sec and try and outflank Farage to his right.

    If he could also persuade someone like Jeremy Hunt to be Shadow Chancellor then it could be a formidable combination.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,267

    FWIW, my scores on the doors, out of ten.

    Reform: 9.8

    Council results beyond their wildest dreams, and a win in Runcorn, no matter how narrow. At least one and probably two mayors as well. It could have been even better, they missed out on three more mayors by fractions, but they have delivered a revolution.

    Lib Dems: 6.5

    Very solid set of council results, though will be disappointed to miss Devon. Other opportunities still in the bag though. Also disappointing if they've missed out on the target Hull & E Riding mayoralty.

    Green: 6

    Similar to the Lib Dems. Another advance across council chamber but missing the bigger prizes, including the West of England mayor, for which they had been favourites.

    Labour: 1.5

    Catastrophic. Down two-thirds in councillors and dicing with the Greens for fourth place (of fifth, if you count independents), which is awful even allowing for the notionally Con/LD-friendly round of elections. The only bright spark was holding three mayoralties (just) - though even that could be a mixed blessing if they become straws to be grasped.

    Tories: 0.5

    Extinction level event. This is probably what the Liberals felt like in 1918. Half a point for winning the Cambs mayor, against which the caveat noted on Labour also applies.

    As I’ve said a few times

    Kemi Badenoch = Herbert Samuel.
    Herbert Samuel's Liberals are still around though, were in government a decade ago, have over 70 MPs and have just come second it looks like in the local elections. They never merged with Labour even after they overtook them on votes and seats (albeit 50 years later they did merge with the Labour splinter group of the SDP to form today's Liberal Democrats)
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,328
    Labour's lucky a whole bunch of big cities aren't involved today.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,570
    Leon said:

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    Very eloquent. The British state is now failing on every level - we can all see it with our own eyes on our own streets. It can’t even police our borders and protect British people from hostile foreign invaders - state failure doesn’t get more basic than that

    So we need an absolute reset from top to bottom. A peaceful revolution and a total rethink

    The only party offering that, by definition, must be a new outsider party. They may well fail - who knows, it doesn’t look good - but the voters are now desperate

    Reform are the right party at the right time
    The feeling that shoplifting is out of control is a major aspect of it as well.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,924
    IanB2 said:

    Cookie said:

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    I think it's the word 'useless' which I'd question, given where he's got to.
    Boris was essentially useless, achieving nothing that wasn’t damaging to his party, his country, and ultimately to himself, despite being skilled at working his way to the top.
    Does campaigning prowess correlate with ability to govern? - the evidence for "no" is considerable.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 127,267
    edited May 2
    Scott_xP said:

    @faisalislam

    💥

    PM Carney reveals that King Charles will give the equivalent of the King’s Speech at the end of this month at the reopening of Canada’s Parliament… monarchists in Canada have called this “a great show of sovereignty” for Canada…

    This has not occurred since 1977.

    https://x.com/faisalislam/status/1918322248324206968

    Means the King will visit Canada before Trump's state visit here then and give the first monarch's opening of the Canadian Parliament for nearly half a century
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093
    Scott_xP said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    Once again you confuse wining votes with being good at politics.

    BoZo won lots of votes. He was fucking useless.

    Trump won lots of votes. He's senile (and a bit mad)

    Nigel Fucking Farage wins votes and then delivers fuck all

    You are welcome to him
    At this juncture my only response, to you, is pity
  • eekeek Posts: 29,840
    Scott_xP said:

    @faisalislam

    💥

    PM Carney reveals that King Charles will give the equivalent of the King’s Speech at the end of this month at the reopening of Canada’s Parliament… monarchists in Canada have called this “a great show of sovereignty” for Canada…

    This has not occurred since 1977.

    https://x.com/faisalislam/status/1918322248324206968

    That’s a clear hands off message to Trump - which will make his state visit interesting although Trump will probably have forgotten the slight by then
  • TimGeoTimGeo Posts: 25
    Clearly a good night for Reform and Bad night for the Conservatives, but on a low turn out an in a relatively no impact election 4 years away from a General Election, Farage has clearly moved from being a strong communicator ( I personally dislike him) to create a larger national organisation with some credible figures ( Andrea Jenkyn's for one ) How Reform perform under greater scrutiny build a team instead of being a one man show I am not convinced. But certainly a good night for them and the loss of Councillors by the Conservatives and Labour will make rebuilding harder for both parties.
  • DopermeanDopermean Posts: 970
    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    Cameron, his initial mistake begat Johnson
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,570
    TimGeo said:

    Clearly a good night for Reform and Bad night for the Conservatives, but on a low turn out an in a relatively no impact election 4 years away from a General Election, Farage has clearly moved from being a strong communicator ( I personally dislike him) to create a larger national organisation with some credible figures ( Andrea Jenkyn's for one ) How Reform perform under greater scrutiny build a team instead of being a one man show I am not convinced. But certainly a good night for them and the loss of Councillors by the Conservatives and Labour will make rebuilding harder for both parties.

    Do we know what the turnout was? Because in Runcorn it was quite respectable. Also looking forward to seeing the projected national share from John Curtice.
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 5,016
    Scott_xP said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    Once again you confuse wining votes with being good at politics.

    BoZo won lots of votes. He was fucking useless.

    Trump won lots of votes. He's senile (and a bit mad)

    Nigel Fucking Farage wins votes and then delivers fuck all

    You are welcome to him
    Can you give us a counter-example?
    Some-one who was "good at politics" but didn't get many votes.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,371
    edited May 2
    Before today one of the things I thought was holding back a Reform replacement of the Tories was that the Tories would remain, in some places, the preserve of the right wing voter - typically the more affluent, southern/south-midlands, rural council areas.

    But now we’ve seen REFUK:

    - the largest party on Worcestershire CC;
    - the largest party on Warwickshire CC;
    - 11 seats in Gloucestershire;
    - second largest party (18 seats) in Devon;

    Admittedly there are places like Oxfordshire where they’re still struggling, and I expect they won’t do tremendous trade in Bucks (though they seem to be doing ok in Herts). But they’re clearly a more national force than we perhaps expected them to be. And that bodes badly for the Tories.
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,270
    edited May 2
    pm215 said:

    IanB2 said:

    So on face value we currently have:

    Reform majority councils

    Derbyshire
    Durham
    Kent
    Lancashire
    Lincolnshire
    Nottinghamshire
    Staffordshire

    Reform largest party - Able to form a working majority if they can persuade the Tories to join them.

    Leicestershire
    Warwickshire
    Worcestershire

    Tory largest party - Able to form a working majority if they can persuade Reform to join them.

    Northumberland

    Lib Dem largest party - Able to form a working majority if they can persuade the Greens to join them.

    Devon
    Gloucestershire

    I expect Cambridgeshire to go Lib Dem overall majority. The others I don't really know yet. Some are VERY late in starting counting.

    Cambs would be done were it not for the peculiar slowness of the city. With Labour having such a bad night, surely the LibDems will regain enough of wards they’ve held in the past there, to capture the whole county.
    I dunno, I think it has a fair chance to stay no overall control. The LDs need another five seats for a majority out of the total 12 city seats. They won three in 2021, with the rest Labour, and presumably will retain those three. Maybe they can take another two, but maybe not.
    Five seats in the city ought to be achievable with Labour flat on its back. I'm not familiar with the latest boundaries but the city centre normally delivers three, the posh suburbs to the south one or two, plus one from Chesterton makes five
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093
    MaxPB said:

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Yup, Labour (and the Tories) need to hit the pause button on immigration tomorrow including no more new asylum seekers and deportations of existing ones. Suspend the HRA for the next 4 years and get them all out of the country, no more article 8, no more boat arrivals, no more minimum wage workers bringing 5 dependents with them.
    Exactly right. Something much much tougher, much more like the Danish Social Democrats - who WIN with this kind of policy, yet remain on the Left otherwise

    They are an actual living example of what leftwing parties MUST do, to beat the alt.right: right there, in the EU, getting it done

    Yet the Left (and centre Right) is too wedded to its Woke religion - at least in the UK - so they won't
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,301

    Can you give us a counter-example?
    Some-one who was "good at politics" but didn't get many votes.

    Gordon Brown
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,873

    Pulpstar said:

    One possible strategy is Bobby J could bring Lowe in as shadow Home Sec and try and outflank Farage to his right.

    If he could also persuade someone like Jeremy Hunt to be Shadow Chancellor then it could be a formidable combination.
    I think this is the only combination that works for the Tories, they need to be on the right, repudiate the Boriswave and apologise to the country for importing en masse people who are culturally completely alien to our own. A complete pause on immigration from poor countries has got the be the answer, Labour and the Tories really need to arrive to that conclusion sooner rather than later, raise the immigration barrier to £60k in London and SE and £50k elsewhere, no exemptions for any industries, limit student visas to redbrick universities and make them bid for a maximum of 20k per year, and above all pause asylum seeking for the next 4 years and deport the ones we do have that are in hotels.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,844

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Probably not carry on hoovering in hundreds of thousands of people and telling the voters they are wrong.

  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 5,016
    Dopermean said:

    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    Cameron, his initial mistake begat Johnson
    You mean him extending the deadline for selecting the Tory candidate for London Mayor, twice , before Boris became the candidate?
  • DecrepiterJohnLDecrepiterJohnL Posts: 30,359
    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    When Boris Met Dave should be compulsory viewing in school history lessons.
  • kamskikamski Posts: 6,378
    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    A stupider, uglier and less funny Beppe Grillo. Who has sunk into political irrelevance, after topping the polls a few years ago.
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,441
    eek said:

    Scott_xP said:

    @faisalislam

    💥

    PM Carney reveals that King Charles will give the equivalent of the King’s Speech at the end of this month at the reopening of Canada’s Parliament… monarchists in Canada have called this “a great show of sovereignty” for Canada…

    This has not occurred since 1977.

    https://x.com/faisalislam/status/1918322248324206968

    That’s a clear hands off message to Trump - which will make his state visit interesting although Trump will probably have forgotten the slight by then
    Hardly a slight, merely His Majesty the King in right of Canada giving his government´s speech from the throne.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,301
    Fuck immigrants and hate the EU is the only winning policy

    @BethRigby

    Just in from a LD source: party "increasingly confident Lib Dems will finish ahead of both the Tories and Labour at the local elections for the first time ever (in terms of councillor numbers elected)" in this round of voting
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,974
    This candidate won, with Reform second.

    https://x.com/_tomscotson/status/1916087003495485802

    Labour figures fear more Gaza independent gains at the locals on Thursday

    My dispatch from Burnley, where one candidate challenging Labour wants to end “free mixing” between men and women
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,961
    .

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Tackle the problems blamed on immigration. Note where people are complaining. It isn't where jobs are plentiful and services are good. Immigrants are the problem because schools are poor and the NHS is sinking and there aren't any jobs and the council is broke and crime is high and and and

    Go after these problems. With crime under control you can't blame immigrants. With NHS experiences transformed you can't blame migrants. With jobs paying the bills and easier to get you can't blame migrants.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,844
    TimGeo said:

    Clearly a good night for Reform and Bad night for the Conservatives, but on a low turn out an in a relatively no impact election 4 years away from a General Election, Farage has clearly moved from being a strong communicator ( I personally dislike him) to create a larger national organisation with some credible figures ( Andrea Jenkyn's for one ) How Reform perform under greater scrutiny build a team instead of being a one man show I am not convinced. But certainly a good night for them and the loss of Councillors by the Conservatives and Labour will make rebuilding harder for both parties.

    This also gives Reform a councillor base and an activist base for the next election as well as exactly,where to target.

    It truly is a seismic revolution.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,840

    Pulpstar said:

    One possible strategy is Bobby J could bring Lowe in as shadow Home Sec and try and outflank Farage to his right.

    I know the Tories are planning on going big on Farage following Trump’s orders to take back Shamima Begum.
    So the Tory principle will be let Bangladesh deal with a problem we created.

    Now granted it’s just about the only thing I agree with Farage and Trump about but a country should be responsible for its screw ups and shouldn’t try to dump them on others
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093
    Sean_F said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    I wonder if anyone still thinks Reform’s performance is “underwhelming.”
    Indeed. And remember when Farage proved these fools wrong, and actually DID win a seat in the Commons

    What did we hear then? "Oh he's so lazy, he doesn't care, he'll never go to Clacton, it's his last hurrah and he'll spend more time in Mar e Lago than the UK, he's a useless chancer, a USELESS CHANCER"

    Well, now we know what Farage did after he won his seat in Clacton. He quietly built a local political base capable of winning many hundreds of council seats, and installing 600 councillors from scratch, and taking over 7 or more actual councils, in one election

    But hey, maybe he just got "lucky" again. After all we know he is lazy and a USELESS CHANCER
  • FossFoss Posts: 1,438

    This candidate won, with Reform second.

    https://x.com/_tomscotson/status/1916087003495485802

    Labour figures fear more Gaza independent gains at the locals on Thursday

    My dispatch from Burnley, where one candidate challenging Labour wants to end “free mixing” between men and women

    That's not exactly an ideal choice...
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,773
    PNS Time...
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,570
    edited May 2
    BBC projected national share just released by Prof John Curtice

    RefUK 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Grn 11%
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,773
    Ref 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Green 11%
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,412

    This candidate won, with Reform second.

    https://x.com/_tomscotson/status/1916087003495485802

    Labour figures fear more Gaza independent gains at the locals on Thursday

    My dispatch from Burnley, where one candidate challenging Labour wants to end “free mixing” between men and women

    So not in favour of unisex toilets, I suspect...
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093
    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    A stupider, uglier and less funny Beppe Grillo. Who has sunk into political irrelevance, after topping the polls a few years ago.
    Remind me of the year Beppe Grillo successfully built a eurosceptic party which forced an Italian referendum and then won Italexit, as Italy quit the EU

    Did Beppe Grillo do that? No, he did not

    Next
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,948
    Chris said:

    Given that (on the BBC's latest figures) both the Tories and Labour have lost about 70% net of the seats they were defending, it's rather remarkable that the net changes in councillors for Ref+Con and Lab+LD+Grn are just +4% and -2% respectively.

    And in fact now they are both +2%. I find that amazing.
  • numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 7,371
    LOL at the Tories on 15%
  • No_Offence_AlanNo_Offence_Alan Posts: 5,016
    Scott_xP said:

    Can you give us a counter-example?
    Some-one who was "good at politics" but didn't get many votes.

    Gordon Brown
    I wouldn't say he was good at politics. He is now supporting lots of things that he failed to do while Chancellor or PM.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,924
    Dopermean said:

    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    Cameron, his initial mistake begat Johnson
    Yes but it can all get rather "kneebone's connected to the ... thighbone".

    I mean, how far back do we go? Blair chickening out of the Euro because he was scared of Brown?
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,873

    .

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Tackle the problems blamed on immigration. Note where people are complaining. It isn't where jobs are plentiful and services are good. Immigrants are the problem because schools are poor and the NHS is sinking and there aren't any jobs and the council is broke and crime is high and and and

    Go after these problems. With crime under control you can't blame immigrants. With NHS experiences transformed you can't blame migrants. With jobs paying the bills and easier to get you can't blame migrants.
    But you can't do any of this because low wage migrants don't generate enough economic activity to pay for it. Our taxes are already too high because every immigrant lowers our GDP per capita and we allowed 2m to come to the country with basically zero restrictions on incomes and dependents. Immigration is a huge net drag on our GDP per capita and it doesn't generate enough tax income for the government to cover the welfare requirements they and their dependents bring with them.

    Deportation of low wage migrants, illegals and hitting the pause button on asylum is the answer.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,859
    edited May 2
    Taz said:

    TimGeo said:

    Clearly a good night for Reform and Bad night for the Conservatives, but on a low turn out an in a relatively no impact election 4 years away from a General Election, Farage has clearly moved from being a strong communicator ( I personally dislike him) to create a larger national organisation with some credible figures ( Andrea Jenkyn's for one ) How Reform perform under greater scrutiny build a team instead of being a one man show I am not convinced. But certainly a good night for them and the loss of Councillors by the Conservatives and Labour will make rebuilding harder for both parties.

    This also gives Reform a councillor base and an activist base for the next election as well as exactly,where to target.

    It truly is a seismic revolution.
    I don't buy it.

    Some of the ones I have seen are quite Trumpish, with endless loops of tapes of conspiracy theories in their heads. Much of the stuff they rant about has been debunked or does not exist.

    We will see if they can run anything, or achieve anything, first.

    The slogan around here has been MAGA - Make Ashfield Great Again. That hints at one problem - they have their heads in an imagined past.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,364

    Scott_xP said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    Once again you confuse wining votes with being good at politics.

    BoZo won lots of votes. He was fucking useless.

    Trump won lots of votes. He's senile (and a bit mad)

    Nigel Fucking Farage wins votes and then delivers fuck all

    You are welcome to him
    Can you give us a counter-example?
    Some-one who was "good at politics" but didn't get many votes.
    Rory the ex Tory.
  • Andy_JSAndy_JS Posts: 34,570
    edited May 2

    Ref 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Green 11%

    Why doesn't Starmer introduce PR tomorrow? He has a massive majority.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 53,817

    PNS Time...

    Is there a cream for that?
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 51,270
    Leon said:

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    Saying such things is just fucking stupid at this point - but then, it is you talking

    Farage is a politician. In what possible universe - outside of your miniature brain - is he “useless” at politics given the course of British history this last decade? He’s started or harnessed TWO parties and used both to change the course of our politics very dramatically. Yours is a laughable perspective. Childishly dim
    You are making the HY mistake of seeing politics as about elections and not about governing and achieving something for your town or county or country. Perhaps it's not surprising that you fail to see the bigger picture; whether Reform will achieve anything worthwhile remains to be seen.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,364
    Andy_JS said:

    Ref 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Green 11%

    Why doesn't Starmer introduce PR tomorrow? He has a massive majority.
    Because he has a million seat majority on a fraction of the vote perhaps?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,808
    Dopermean said:

    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    Cameron, his initial mistake begat Johnson
    Cameron's initial mistake was aping Blair and not unrolling his legacy.

    Thats why the country is in the shit.
  • kamskikamski Posts: 6,378
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    A stupider, uglier and less funny Beppe Grillo. Who has sunk into political irrelevance, after topping the polls a few years ago.
    Remind me of the year Beppe Grillo successfully built a eurosceptic party which forced an Italian referendum and then won Italexit, as Italy quit the EU

    Did Beppe Grillo do that? No, he did not

    Next
    He did build a eurosceptic party, and also won a referendum in 2016 which forced the resignation of the Italian prime minister. Thanks for reminding me of some more similarities. Uncanny!
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,811
    TimGeo said:

    Clearly a good night for Reform and Bad night for the Conservatives, but on a low turn out an in a relatively no impact election 4 years away from a General Election, Farage has clearly moved from being a strong communicator ( I personally dislike him) to create a larger national organisation with some credible figures ( Andrea Jenkyn's for one ) How Reform perform under greater scrutiny build a team instead of being a one man show I am not convinced. But certainly a good night for them and the loss of Councillors by the Conservatives and Labour will make rebuilding harder for both parties.

    Agree. Would be interested to see what the turnout has been. Not to say that it diminishes Reform's achievement but no one writes in to the restaurant to say they had a fine dinner thank you and everything was okay. So if you are upset you will likely have voted.

    What are people upset about? Yes infrastructure, yes services, yes the NHS, but yes also immigration.

    I have always said that the UK likes immigration because it has consistently voted parties into power that have increased immigration (despite promises to the contrary - did Lab even promise anything on this?). But perhaps, while one swallow does not a summer make, this is people voting with their feet about it.

    Because Reform is only and ever about immigration.
  • bondegezoubondegezou Posts: 13,910
    It is indeed a stunning performance by Reform UK. The LibDems were unlucky to miss out on control of 2 councils by tiny margins (Devon, Gloucestershire), but can be very happy overall.

    The "big two" are flattered in the mayoral results. Holds for Labour in three close mayoral contests makes up for a big drop in councillor numbers. The Tories gaining the Cambridgeshire and Peterborough mayor gives them something to celebrate amid the devastation, although their gain is more to do with switching to FPTP!
  • CiceroCicero Posts: 3,441
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    A stupider, uglier and less funny Beppe Grillo. Who has sunk into political irrelevance, after topping the polls a few years ago.
    Remind me of the year Beppe Grillo successfully built a eurosceptic party which forced an Italian referendum and then won Italexit, as Italy quit the EU

    Did Beppe Grillo do that? No, he did not

    Next
    Farage is a rogue. Sometimes rogues win. This time he won. Doesn´t mean he´s not a rogue though does it?

    I mean, we know you are only masquerading as a political commentator, but why not just have a scintilla of proportion before your fleshlight driven frenzies over Farage winning a minor by election and the least important round of local elections puts you back in hospital.
  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 5,799
    Are politicians overestimating how much international opprobrium we would endure if we got serious on the boats - e.g by partial withdrawal from treaties etc.?

    However ill-conceived Rwanda may have been, one notable aspect was how little international criticism there was.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,364
    kinabalu said:

    Dopermean said:

    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    Cameron, his initial mistake begat Johnson
    Yes but it can all get rather "kneebone's connected to the ... thighbone".

    I mean, how far back do we go? Blair chickening out of the Euro because he was scared of Brown?
    Seeing as it is happening across the western world it probably isn't down to any of them but a mix of demographics, globalisation and social media, in that order. More fun to blame an individual politico but doesn't stand up to reality.
  • pm215pm215 Posts: 1,250
    IanB2 said:

    pm215 said:

    IanB2 said:

    So on face value we currently have:

    Reform majority councils

    Derbyshire
    Durham
    Kent
    Lancashire
    Lincolnshire
    Nottinghamshire
    Staffordshire

    Reform largest party - Able to form a working majority if they can persuade the Tories to join them.

    Leicestershire
    Warwickshire
    Worcestershire

    Tory largest party - Able to form a working majority if they can persuade Reform to join them.

    Northumberland

    Lib Dem largest party - Able to form a working majority if they can persuade the Greens to join them.

    Devon
    Gloucestershire

    I expect Cambridgeshire to go Lib Dem overall majority. The others I don't really know yet. Some are VERY late in starting counting.

    Cambs would be done were it not for the peculiar slowness of the city. With Labour having such a bad night, surely the LibDems will regain enough of wards they’ve held in the past there, to capture the whole county.
    I dunno, I think it has a fair chance to stay no overall control. The LDs need another five seats for a majority out of the total 12 city seats. They won three in 2021, with the rest Labour, and presumably will retain those three. Maybe they can take another two, but maybe not.
    Five seats in the city ought to be achievable with Labour flat on its back. I'm not familiar with the latest boundaries but the city centre normally delivers three, the posh suburbs to the south one or two, plus one from Chesterton makes five
    LDs just lost Newnham to the Greens, so that's one extra they need now... But they have taken Market off Labour.

  • carnforthcarnforth Posts: 5,799
    Temu gives up:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy79j2n7d4o

    "Temu to stop selling goods from China directly to US customers"

    Will import in bulk instead, the de minimus route being closed.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093
    edited May 2
    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    Saying such things is just fucking stupid at this point - but then, it is you talking

    Farage is a politician. In what possible universe - outside of your miniature brain - is he “useless” at politics given the course of British history this last decade? He’s started or harnessed TWO parties and used both to change the course of our politics very dramatically. Yours is a laughable perspective. Childishly dim
    You are making the HY mistake of seeing politics as about elections and not about governing and achieving something for your town or county or country. Perhaps it's not surprising that you fail to see the bigger picture; whether Reform will achieve anything worthwhile remains to be seen.
    Politics is about BOTH - winning and governing - and much else

    To achieve anything you have to WIN. Farage has now shown he is consistently the biggest, boldest winner in UK politics, since Blair, and in some ways even more impressive than Blair, as he's done it as an outsider

    As for achievements beyond winning, he got the UK to exit the EU, something that many regarded as entirely unthinable. But he did it. Of course, you despise the Brexit vote, but tht's because you're a Remainer. Farage is a Leaver: Farage bent British history to his desired end, Brexit, making him more significant than Blair, as well

    Now Farage might have a chance at an even bigger prize, governing the UK as PM. I've no true dea how he will do, and nor do you, but the evidence of his organisational skill and cunning suggests a high degree of intelligence. And the ability to think strategically. He might be good at governing AS WELL

    Basically he is very good at politics, and denying it is now futile and mortifying
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,924

    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    When Boris Met Dave should be compulsory viewing in school history lessons.
    Yes. The whole disaster of was birthed on the playing fields of Eton.

    That's the 'revolution' we need. No more of that born-to-rule shit.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,364
    Leon said:

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    IanB2 said:

    Leon said:

    nico67 said:

    Leon said:

    Leon said:

    Is any PB still gonna trot out their "Farage is a useless chancer" bollocks?

    I hope not, after this. It would be embarrassing, to put it lightly

    Farage wouldn't be the first "useless chancer" to become PM, if indeed he makes it that far.
    Do you still believe he is a "uselss chancer"?

    In a way, I really hope you do, and that you explain your workings here. It will add to the gaiety of the nation
    He’s had a huge impact on the UK and I get people like him. But I think personally he’s a cancer on the UK .
    Which is fine and understandable

    The people I’m mocking are the PBers who continually insist Farage is useless at politics, “he never won a seat in the commons” - oops - “he just got lucky”, he was “nothing to do with brexit winning”

    People like @Nigel_Foremain and @Scott_P snd many many others
    Being a useless chancer isn’t incompatible with persuasively selling a lot of folk some snake oil. Indeed there’s a considerable overlap in the skills required.
    Saying such things is just fucking stupid at this point - but then, it is you talking

    Farage is a politician. In what possible universe - outside of your miniature brain - is he “useless” at politics given the course of British history this last decade? He’s started or harnessed TWO parties and used both to change the course of our politics very dramatically. Yours is a laughable perspective. Childishly dim
    You are making the HY mistake of seeing politics as about elections and not about governing and achieving something for your town or county or country. Perhaps it's not surprising that you fail to see the bigger picture; whether Reform will achieve anything worthwhile remains to be seen.
    Politics is about BOTH, and much else

    To achieve anything you have to WIN. Farage has now shown he is consistently the biggest, boldest winner in UK politics, since Blair, and in some ways even more impressive than Blair, as he's done it as an outsider

    As for achievements beyond winning, he got the UK to exit the EU, something that many regarded as entirely unthinable. But he did it. Of course, you despise the Brexit vote, but that's cause you lost and Farage won: Farage bent British history to his desired end, making him more signficant than Blair, as well

    Now Farage might have a chance at at en even bigger prize, governing the UK as PM. I've no itrue dea how he will do, and nor do you, but the evidence of his organisational skill and cunning suggests a high degree of intelligence. And the ability to think strategically. He might be good at governing AS WELL

    Basically he is very good at politics, and denying it is now futile and mortifying
    So you think he may surprise on the upside? Getting a weird sense of deja vu here.....
  • RattersRatters Posts: 1,318
    edited May 2
    Andy_JS said:

    BBC projected national share just released by Prof John Curtice

    RefUK 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Grn 11%

    That'd be terminal for the Tories. Would almost certainly end up in fourth place in seats, potentially fifth including the SNP depending how the pendulum swings up there.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,859
    edited May 2
    Chris said:

    Chris said:

    Given that (on the BBC's latest figures) both the Tories and Labour have lost about 70% net of the seats they were defending, it's rather remarkable that the net changes in councillors for Ref+Con and Lab+LD+Grn are just +4% and -2% respectively.

    And in fact now they are both +2%. I find that amazing.
    So if I have that right we need -4% of the ~1200 results declared so far to balance it out. That is, around 48 Councillors.

    In the bits of Notts I have been tracking Ashfield Indies are down by 9, and Broxtowe Indies (2 groups) are down by 8, and other Indies are down by 3.

    That's nearly half the balance item just from Notts.

    As you say - quite a change.
  • Northern_AlNorthern_Al Posts: 8,800
    edited May 2
    Andy_JS said:

    BBC projected national share just released by Prof John Curtice

    RefUK 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Grn 11%

    That's not actually as bad as I feared.
    Lab/LD/Green 48%, Ref/Con 45%.
    Left of centre wins!
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,740
    Wasn't there a poll a couple of days before the local elections that was roughly what the projected national vote share just announced?
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,844
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,301
    Leon said:

    Now Farage might have a chance at an even bigger prize, governing the UK as PM. I've no true dea how he will do, and nor do you, but the evidence of his organisational skill and cunning suggests a high degree of intelligence. And the ability to think strategically. He might be good at governing AS WELL

    Trump won the Presidency and his brains are visibly leaking out of his ears

    Your assertion is bollocks

    Your fanboi crush on these twats is embarrassing
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,740
    Taz said:
    Aren't teachers also looking like they are going to ballot for strike action?
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093
    Andy_JS said:

    BBC projected national share just released by Prof John Curtice

    RefUK 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Grn 11%

    Matthew Goodwin will be popping the English fizz tonight. And Find Out Now are not looking so outlandish
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,873

    MaxPB said:

    TOPPING said:

    .

    TOPPING said:

    It's complicated, but if I had to identify one single thing behind the Reform surge it would be asylum seekers in hotels. There's enough outrage about this to add quite a few percent to the Reform vote everywhere as, rightly or wrongly (probably the latter), people think they could solve it.

    This ties in with the boats. Now, this election notwithstanding, where I think those who don't like foreigners are making their position known, the UK has consistently shown that it is happy to have immigrants, and plenty of them. What they don't like is being out of control, or freeloaders.

    The boats represent a tangible example of the government not being able to control its own borders, and hence why successive governments are so keen to stop them, despite the tiny numbers arriving in this way.

    Likewise, "asylum hotels" are seen as freeloading and jumping the queue. And every freeborn Englishman detests queue jumpers.
    The people in hotels would love to have jobs. That’s what they’re hoping for, to get asylum and to be allowed to get a job. The rules don’t let them have jobs. The system forces them not to do anything and the Tories then produced these very long proceeding times.
    Sure. Not the point. People (UK people) see them as freeloading and getting room service of coffee and pain au chocolat plus a spa treatment at the taxpayers' expense.
    And people who we don't want in the country in the first place. I think Labour needs to seriously consider closing the UK to new asylum applications and temporarily pause our members of whatever treaties is required to achieve this. If we're to avoid a Reform majority in 2029 we need a period of 4 years with no new asylum seekers and to deport all of the ones we do have as well as revoking visas for the low wage legal migrants and "students" that overstay and work illegally.

    They really, really need to get tough or watch as more and more people turn to Farage and we sleepwalk into a reform majority.
    Why didn't the Tories do this?
    Because they're embarrassed by being right wing. They can't go to the cool parties or lecture people at Davos on being on the right side of history.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,961
    MaxPB said:

    .

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Tackle the problems blamed on immigration. Note where people are complaining. It isn't where jobs are plentiful and services are good. Immigrants are the problem because schools are poor and the NHS is sinking and there aren't any jobs and the council is broke and crime is high and and and

    Go after these problems. With crime under control you can't blame immigrants. With NHS experiences transformed you can't blame migrants. With jobs paying the bills and easier to get you can't blame migrants.
    But you can't do any of this because low wage migrants don't generate enough economic activity to pay for it. Our taxes are already too high because every immigrant lowers our GDP per capita and we allowed 2m to come to the country with basically zero restrictions on incomes and dependents. Immigration is a huge net drag on our GDP per capita and it doesn't generate enough tax income for the government to cover the welfare requirements they and their dependents bring with them.

    Deportation of low wage migrants, illegals and hitting the pause button on asylum is the answer.
    OK, lets play the scenario. Farage has won the election and your final sentence is now policy.

    How?

    To deport people you have to do multiple things.
    Declare the "low wage migrants" who are working legally to now be illegal
    Identify the people who are illegal
    Arrest, detain and process them through the courts
    Deport them to a country willing to receive them

    I'm not questioning the merits of the policy, just looking at the details as to how it could be enacted. None of the things on the list are quick, and many of them involve the things people don't want such as detaining them in accommodation.
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,740

    Andy_JS said:

    BBC projected national share just released by Prof John Curtice

    RefUK 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Grn 11%

    That's not actually as bad as I feared.
    Lab/LD/Green 48%, Ref/Con 45%.
    Left of centre wins!
    Aren't 20% for Lab and 15% for Tory the worst ever?
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,630
    Andy_JS said:

    TimGeo said:

    Clearly a good night for Reform and Bad night for the Conservatives, but on a low turn out an in a relatively no impact election 4 years away from a General Election, Farage has clearly moved from being a strong communicator ( I personally dislike him) to create a larger national organisation with some credible figures ( Andrea Jenkyn's for one ) How Reform perform under greater scrutiny build a team instead of being a one man show I am not convinced. But certainly a good night for them and the loss of Councillors by the Conservatives and Labour will make rebuilding harder for both parties.

    Do we know what the turnout was? Because in Runcorn it was quite respectable. Also looking forward to seeing the projected national share from John Curtice.
    NEV is horrific.

    Reform 30%

    Lab 20%

    Lib Dem 17%

    Con 15%

    Green 11%

    Find Out Now turns out to be quite accurate.
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,859
    edited May 2
    carnforth said:

    Temu gives up:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy79j2n7d4o

    "Temu to stop selling goods from China directly to US customers"

    Will import in bulk instead, the de minimus route being closed.

    That's more Trump chaos for US consumers, more tax on sales, a poorer range of goods, and a loss of flexibility.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,773
    Kemi speaking. Delusional.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,301

    MaxPB said:

    .

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Tackle the problems blamed on immigration. Note where people are complaining. It isn't where jobs are plentiful and services are good. Immigrants are the problem because schools are poor and the NHS is sinking and there aren't any jobs and the council is broke and crime is high and and and

    Go after these problems. With crime under control you can't blame immigrants. With NHS experiences transformed you can't blame migrants. With jobs paying the bills and easier to get you can't blame migrants.
    But you can't do any of this because low wage migrants don't generate enough economic activity to pay for it. Our taxes are already too high because every immigrant lowers our GDP per capita and we allowed 2m to come to the country with basically zero restrictions on incomes and dependents. Immigration is a huge net drag on our GDP per capita and it doesn't generate enough tax income for the government to cover the welfare requirements they and their dependents bring with them.

    Deportation of low wage migrants, illegals and hitting the pause button on asylum is the answer.
    OK, lets play the scenario. Farage has won the election and your final sentence is now policy.

    How?

    To deport people you have to do multiple things.
    Declare the "low wage migrants" who are working legally to now be illegal
    Identify the people who are illegal
    Arrest, detain and process them through the courts
    Deport them to a country willing to receive them

    I'm not questioning the merits of the policy, just looking at the details as to how it could be enacted. None of the things on the list are quick, and many of them involve the things people don't want such as detaining them in accommodation.
    I expect he wants to follow the Mad King

    Hire some blackshirts to round up undesirables and put them on planes to El Salvador

    Job done
  • Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 62,565
    Pulpstar said:

    Kemi surely in the most trouble short term ?

    Starmer is PM with a huge majority no matter how shaky his locals base is. Badenoch has lost 456 out of 645 councillors declared so far. In opposition !

    Disaster doesn't begin to cover it.

    Oh, landslide is much too mild a word; this is like an asteroid coming down and wiping out all life on earth!
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093

    Wasn't there a poll a couple of days before the local elections that was roughly what the projected national vote share just announced?

    Find Out Now had Reform on 29, and Labour on 21, and the Tories on 19 - IIRC

    It was much mocked, on here
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,740
    edited May 2
    MattW said:

    carnforth said:

    Temu gives up:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy79j2n7d4o

    "Temu to stop selling goods from China directly to US customers"

    Will import in bulk instead, the de minimus route being closed.

    That's more Trump chaos for US consumers, and a loss of flexibility.
    No, this is actually the one good thing Trump has done (albeit in usual chaotic Trump fashion). I know a number of US based e-commerce business people and they are sick of how this rule is exploited by the likes of Temu. They can sell all sorts of shit without having to stick to any rules and if the product turns out to be dodgy the sellers on there just disappear and come back again as a different company. If the US company did it they would be liable for all sorts of fines. It is not a level playing field for companies based outside of China.
  • FossFoss Posts: 1,438

    Andy_JS said:

    BBC projected national share just released by Prof John Curtice

    RefUK 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Grn 11%

    That's not actually as bad as I feared.
    Lab/LD/Green 48%, Ref/Con 45%.
    Left of centre wins!
    Aren't 20% for Lab and 15% for Tory the worst ever?
    2019 was 28%/28%
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,301
    @faisalislam

    Carney confirms he made a request to King Charles for the “honour” to open the Canadian Parliament to give the speech from the throne “clearly underscores sovereignty” of Canada with our “Head of State”

    - some clear side eye to the White House that he will not get that role…

    Carney being pressed on whether Trump has dropped the 51st state rhetoric, and he did not raise it in the phone conversation with Carney on Tuesday…
  • kamskikamski Posts: 6,378
    MattW said:

    carnforth said:

    Temu gives up:

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwy79j2n7d4o

    "Temu to stop selling goods from China directly to US customers"

    Will import in bulk instead, the de minimus route being closed.

    That's more Trump chaos for US consumers, more tax on sales, a poorer range of goods, and a loss of flexibility.
    Sounds like good news. Shipping individual items of tat from China to the US to exploit a customs loophole was never very green.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,630
    Leon said:

    kamski said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    A stupider, uglier and less funny Beppe Grillo. Who has sunk into political irrelevance, after topping the polls a few years ago.
    Remind me of the year Beppe Grillo successfully built a eurosceptic party which forced an Italian referendum and then won Italexit, as Italy quit the EU

    Did Beppe Grillo do that? No, he did not

    Next
    There’s a great deal of sour grapes. Farage is the most consequential British politician of the past thirty years.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,844
    MaxPB said:

    .

    rcs1000 said:

    My two take aways:

    (1)
    The challenge the Conservatives face was well described on the last thread: how do they simultaneously appeal to those they have lost to Reform, and those they have lost to the Liberal Democrats.

    It is clear that they have to tack right: but if they do that, how do they even begin to differentiate themselves from Reform, especially as all Reform needs to do is to attack them for their previous period in government?

    (2)
    The fragmentation of voting patterns is on a scale we've never seen before. Reform is winning close to half of all councillors. But it's doing in on an National Equivalent Vote share that is only a few point more than the LibDems managed in 2009.

    We see this is the Mayoral elections: winning parties are coming in with sub 30% numbers. We could see MPs - multiple MPs - elected with less than a quarter of the vote in 2029.

    Reform are a political Black Hole. A Nigel-sized singularity which is now sucking everything else towards it.

    Whilst there is a major challenge for the Tories as described, the gravitational challenge for Labour is just as existential.

    What is at the heart of the Black Hole? The need to significantly reform the UK from top to bottom. Labour and the Tories can't tack their way around the edges of the event horizon - they'll get torn apart. Their only solution is to become a bigger black hole.

    How do you defeat populism? By fixing the problems that drive populism. In this country that means fixing public services, making work pay, putting the pride back into our communities. You can't do that by cutting WFA or scrapping HS2 or performative tossery about penises.
    The biggest reasons people have for voting Reform are "another party needs a go" and "their policies on immigration". What do you suggest mainstream parties should do about immigration?

    https://yougov.co.uk/politics/articles/51474-what-is-attracting-24-of-britons-to-reform-uk
    Tackle the problems blamed on immigration. Note where people are complaining. It isn't where jobs are plentiful and services are good. Immigrants are the problem because schools are poor and the NHS is sinking and there aren't any jobs and the council is broke and crime is high and and and

    Go after these problems. With crime under control you can't blame immigrants. With NHS experiences transformed you can't blame migrants. With jobs paying the bills and easier to get you can't blame migrants.
    But you can't do any of this because low wage migrants don't generate enough economic activity to pay for it. Our taxes are already too high because every immigrant lowers our GDP per capita and we allowed 2m to come to the country with basically zero restrictions on incomes and dependents. Immigration is a huge net drag on our GDP per capita and it doesn't generate enough tax income for the government to cover the welfare requirements they and their dependents bring with them.

    Deportation of low wage migrants, illegals and hitting the pause button on asylum is the answer.
    Not giving people here on 5 year care home Visas ILR with the access to everything that comes with it for starters. Especially as many have brought over economically inactive dependents.

    They will never be a net contributor.

    It won’t happen. All the main parties are ideologically in favour of it.
  • tlg86tlg86 Posts: 26,567
    Andy_JS said:

    Ref 30%
    Lab 20%
    LD 17%
    Con 15%
    Green 11%

    Why doesn't Starmer introduce PR tomorrow? He has a massive majority.
    Why would he do that? FPTP is likely to work to the advantage of Labour and the Lib Dems at the next election.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,924

    kinabalu said:

    Dopermean said:

    kinabalu said:

    Taz said:

    David Cameron, this is your legacy (sorry TSE)

    https://x.com/elshadkarbasi/status/1918206416805937385?s=61

    More Johnson's legacy imo. Or perhaps we say both since one begat the other.
    Cameron, his initial mistake begat Johnson
    Yes but it can all get rather "kneebone's connected to the ... thighbone".

    I mean, how far back do we go? Blair chickening out of the Euro because he was scared of Brown?
    Seeing as it is happening across the western world it probably isn't down to any of them but a mix of demographics, globalisation and social media, in that order. More fun to blame an individual politico but doesn't stand up to reality.
    That's true. But I do think it's fair to say the Con meltdown is largely self-inflicted with their choice of Boris Johnson despite knowing he was unfit to be PM.
  • LeonLeon Posts: 60,093
    15 councils now declared, 8 NOC, 7 Reform

    Reform are still the only party to win a council outright
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,082
    edited May 2
    Leon said:

    Wasn't there a poll a couple of days before the local elections that was roughly what the projected national vote share just announced?

    Find Out Now had Reform on 29, and Labour on 21, and the Tories on 19 - IIRC

    It was much mocked, on here
    There are always those who question a poll because they do not like it

    Seems find out now were near the public mood
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,630
    edited May 2

    Pulpstar said:

    Kemi surely in the most trouble short term ?

    Starmer is PM with a huge majority no matter how shaky his locals base is. Badenoch has lost 456 out of 645 councillors declared so far. In opposition !

    Disaster doesn't begin to cover it.

    Oh, landslide is much too mild a word; this is like an asteroid coming down and wiping out all life on earth!
    It’s like 1924 for the Liberals, from the Conservatives POV.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 34,635

    Scott_xP said:

    Leon said:

    God help us if Farage ever gets “quite useful” at politics. He’ll probably win the US presidency and become supreme galactic warlord

    Once again you confuse wining votes with being good at politics.

    BoZo won lots of votes. He was fucking useless.

    Trump won lots of votes. He's senile (and a bit mad)

    Nigel Fucking Farage wins votes and then delivers fuck all

    You are welcome to him
    Can you give us a counter-example?
    Some-one who was "good at politics" but didn't get many votes.
    David Steel?
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,301
    @JohnRentoul

    Exclusive from
    @DavidPBMaddox
    : Tory plotting to replace Badenoch under way after local election disaster

    https://x.com/JohnRentoul/status/1918331622543266143
Sign In or Register to comment.