Has Donald Trump killed Scottish nationalism stone dead? – politicalbetting.com
There has been a lot of wishful thinking when it comes to Scottish independence on both sides such as devolution killing Scottish nationalism stone dead or Sir Keir Starmer becoming Malleus ScotNatorum at the 2024 general election.
Good morning, everyone. The pre-race nonsense will be up slightly later than usual (time-wise, but a day earlier) as qualifying finished not too long ago.
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
Btw, the CDU/CSU, SPD and Greens reached an agreement yesterday on the debt brake reforms. With the Greens getting most of what they wanted:
100 billion for climate protection The infrastructure fund to be only used for "new" projects The Bundesländer (where Greens form part of 6 state governments) also allowed to borrow.
The legislation will probably pass in the Bundestag on Tuesday, but could still be very close as there could be a few dissenters from within these parties but I think not enough to prevent the 2 thirds majority needed.
In the Bundesrat they probably still need the additional approval of the Freie Wähler, who aren't keen on government debt, but I guess they can be bought off somehow.
In a way, Brexit has been good for Scottish nationalism. It shows that there can be a working land border between two countries on the same isle. And a working land border between the EU and rUK. The 'United' Kingdom will be united until it's not.
Independence for London? It has been discussed - there's a general view London (basically to the M25 - there's a natural frontier if there ever was one) would be fine as an independent city state.
On more important matters, on the day I become Supreme Liberal Centrist Dictator (yes, I recognise both the irony and the paradox), my first act will be to outlaw hyperbole.
I read this morning on my news feed the UK has been "rocked by a major earthquake in North Yorkshire". I'm more than intrigued only to find out such earth-shattering (literally) event was 1.0 on the Richter Scale.
1.0? You wouldn't feel it let alone fall out of bed for it. Yes, it can be measured by the geological surveys but, "a major earthquake" ? It's up there with a 20 point fall in the FTSE 100 being called a "crash", a 0.1% decline in GDP being called a "slump" and a one point rise for Reform in an opinion poll a "surge".
So, yes, outlaw hyperbole and take exaggeration with it though that will be a billion times harder...
Independence for London? It has been discussed - there's a general view London (basically to the M25 - there's a natural frontier if there ever was one) would be fine as an independent city state.
On more important matters, on the day I become Supreme Liberal Centrist Dictator (yes, I recognise both the irony and the paradox), my first act will be to outlaw hyperbole.
I read this morning on my news feed the UK has been "rocked by a major earthquake in North Yorkshire". I'm more than intrigued only to find out such earth-shattering (literally) event was 1.0 on the Richter Scale.
1.0? You wouldn't feel it let alone fall out of bed for it. Yes, it can be measured by the geological surveys but, "a major earthquake" ? It's up there with a 20 point fall in the FTSE 100 being called a "crash", a 0.1% decline in GDP being called a "slump" and a one point rise for Reform in an opinion poll a "surge".
So, yes, outlaw hyperbole and take exaggeration with it though that will be a billion times harder...
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
Yes Scotland is uniquely the only country unable to run it's own affairs as a sovereign country, we have all those wonderful English MP's to tell us how our money is spent wisely after all.
Slightly surprised to see in recent weeks people stressing the need for the UK to build up an independent nuclear armoury who previously campaigned to get nuclear weapons out of Faslane
An increasing number of people are covering the kind of issues related to Thiel, Musk, Yarvin and Vance, that I've been banging on about this week. This is a useful interview, which also introduces the excellent names. "nerd reich", and "tech reich".
The particular focus on some of their number's idea of the obscilescence and collapse of the nation- state, in this intervew here , is particularly interesting. https://youtu.be/S5hdGmhaDJk?si=i5jUICPDqmNbkHhU
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
Completely OT. I read the appeal court ruling in the Hanratti case that you posted a few days ago and found it fascinating. Whether or not he did it which isn't that interesting now he's dead the maze of evidence and separating the wheat from the chaff was compulsive. A long read though
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
Yep, polling suggest Scottish voters are certainly tiptoeing away from the populist policies (justice for WASPI women, cheaper energy bills, saving Grangemouth, ‘read my lips, no austerity under Labour’ etc) espoused by Labour before the last GE. That’s mainly because those promises were bullshit, mind.
Trump has not killed Scottish nationalism stone dead. The movement will continue, sometimes popular, sometimes less so. What was already dead was the possibility of success WRT independence.
Trumpism has however firmed up the earth on the grave. Not long ago then model of a successful small state within the EU and NATO, which Scotland could aspire to, were instances like Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.
No longer. Now it is everything to be overtly militarised, nuclear armed, and part of the UK/France/Germany/Poland bigger boys in the playground.
BTW, is Kate Forbes still around? The Tories could do with a decent leader.
Independence for London? It has been discussed - there's a general view London (basically to the M25 - there's a natural frontier if there ever was one) would be fine as an independent city state.
On more important matters, on the day I become Supreme Liberal Centrist Dictator (yes, I recognise both the irony and the paradox), my first act will be to outlaw hyperbole.
I read this morning on my news feed the UK has been "rocked by a major earthquake in North Yorkshire". I'm more than intrigued only to find out such earth-shattering (literally) event was 1.0 on the Richter Scale.
1.0? You wouldn't feel it let alone fall out of bed for it. Yes, it can be measured by the geological surveys but, "a major earthquake" ? It's up there with a 20 point fall in the FTSE 100 being called a "crash", a 0.1% decline in GDP being called a "slump" and a one point rise for Reform in an opinion poll a "surge".
So, yes, outlaw hyperbole and take exaggeration with it though that will be a billion times harder...
So, Putin made Witkoff wait humiliatingly in the reception room for eight hours, just so he could have yet another "urgent" meeting with Lukashenko—once again spending hours chuckling at his clownery in front of the cameras.
And this, despite Witkoff coming for a pre-arranged meeting on matters of war and peace.
I can't follow this argument. I think Trump is nearly irrelevant to the indy debate - but if anything, he helps the indy cause by making the American model of "capitalism" and democracy (lol) even less attractive to people in Scotland, who will continue to look to the Nordics as a model for Scotland.
I agree though on Brexit and the fundamental questions around currency and the border. It is very difficult to swerve these issues. Otoh, energy prices in Scotland are absurdly high for a country that still produces oil and gas, exports 1/3 of its electicity generation, and has 60GW of renewables in the construction pipeline (up from 15GW now). A Scotland with such abundant energy has the opportunity to become as rich as Norway - will we miss that chance for the second time?
I am instintively unionist, but even I am developing a serious grievance over this. If Reform form part of the next government, or there is any equivocation on renewables or energy market reform, then I can see Indy starting to pick up momentum again.
An increasing number of people are covering the kind of issues related to Thiel, Musk, Yarvin and Vance, that I've been banging on about this week. This is a useful interview, which also introduces the excellent names. "nerd reich", and "tech reich".
The particular focus on some of their number's idea of the obscilescence and collapse of the nation- state, in this intervew here , is particularly interesting. https://youtu.be/S5hdGmhaDJk?si=i5jUICPDqmNbkHhU
It's also fascinating how much our very own, dear old William Rees-Mogg seems to have been an influence in all this madness.
There's many different sources confirming how influential his Sovereign Individual book seems to have been on the birth of the kind of techno-fascist, but also anarcho-capitalisr, influence we're seeing behind the new regime.
Trump has not killed Scottish nationalism stone dead. The movement will continue, sometimes popular, sometimes less so. What was already dead was the possibility of success WRT independence.
Trumpism has however firmed up the earth on the grave. Not long ago then model of a successful small state within the EU and NATO, which Scotland could aspire to, were instances like Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.
No longer. Now it is everything to be overtly militarised, nuclear armed, and part of the UK/France/Germany/Poland bigger boys in the playground.
BTW, is Kate Forbes still around? The Tories could do with a decent leader.
Very true Lithuania, Estonia , Latvia all need some big state to take them over and milk them for sure. Belgium, Switzerland and many others as well all unable to manage and needing saved.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
Slightly surprised to see in recent weeks people stressing the need for the UK to build up an independent nuclear armoury who previously campaigned to get nuclear weapons out of Faslane
Circumstances alter cases.
One of the more interesting ones was the pivot by previous Peace Pledge Union people in the run up to WW2.
We are living in the middle of one, as some groups understand what Trump is really doing, in addition to the threat posed by Russia.
It will be very interesting to find who is left. There are all sorts of reasons, of course - some of them quite good reasons in the previous set of circumstances. And some of us (I hope my view, for one) will be too pessimistic on the other side - for all we know the legal system in the USA may get Musk and Trump under control.
Perhaps the USA will allow their weapons to be putchased for Ukraine on commercial terms for Ukraine, rather than go all out to neuter the possibility of any European help getting to Ukraine by refusing to sell us Himars, which is not even made in Europe.
We built the Florence Nightingale hospitals (I think that was the name) during Covid and did not need them. Was that an unnecessary insurance policy or a wise contingency we did not need?
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
I’m not convinced that Trump is killing populism stone dead or that voters are necessarily moving away from it. They may have growing reservations about the more extreme iterations, but I think they are still expecting and wanting a brand of politics that they see mirroring their concerns and addressing them. Both Labour and the Tories in their own way are dabbling with this of late - the Tories with their Reform-lite tendencies and Labour trying to shift the emphasis onto things like welfare reform and the “bloated” administrative state.
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
I don’t think the Lib Dems will make an effort in Runcorn.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
Osborne chose austerity because he was heartless, why the LDs went along with it is another question.
Without increased taxation Labour are lumbered with austerity. Now that is a choice, a foolhardy one in my opinion. Good luck at the next election when deaf, dumb and blind kids are begging on the streets because Labour removed their PIP.
This Labour Government don't think on their feet. They could sell increased taxation (and borrowing) as a necessity post Russia-USA alignment .
If Labour in Westminster are offering austerity for Scotland whilst the SNP can offer free Moms and apple pie why not go it alone. Is Trump even relevant?
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Spending on disability benefits has risen from around £1.1 billion in 1985-86 to £39.1 billion in 2023-24 in nominal terms, and from 0.3 to 1.4 per cent of GDP over the same period. Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi… obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/ obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
Osborne chose austerity because he was heartless, why the LDs went along with it is another question.
Without increased taxation Labour are lumbered with austerity. Now that is a choice, a foolhardy one in my opinion. Good luck at the next election when deaf, dumb and blind kids are begging on the streets because Labour removed their PIP.
This Labour Government don't think on their feet. They could sell increased taxation (and borrowing) as a necessity post Russia-USA alignment .
Oh for pity's sake. Does the plight of the feckless Reeves show you nothing? Osborne chose austerity because the country was bankrupt with unpayable contingent liabilities for an overgrown banking sector and a complete collapse in revenues from that source. The Lib Dems went along because there was no choice. Just like Reeves is doing now.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Spending on disability benefits has risen from around £1.1 billion in 1985-86 to £39.1 billion in 2023-24 in nominal terms, and from 0.3 to 1.4 per cent of GDP over the same period. Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi… obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/ obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
The ScotNats completely wasted Johnson. That was their shot. Now they will have to wait until there is an equally detestable PM in London. Bobby J. would fit the bill. SKS's Red Reform act is banal and disgusting in itself, but nowhere as good, for the ScotNats' purposes, as a truly loathsome tory regime.
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
I’m not convinced that Trump is killing populism stone dead or that voters are necessarily moving away from it. They may have growing reservations about the more extreme iterations, but I think they are still expecting and wanting a brand of politics that they see mirroring their concerns and addressing them. Both Labour and the Tories in their own way are dabbling with this of late - the Tories with their Reform-lite tendencies and Labour trying to shift the emphasis onto things like welfare reform and the “bloated” administrative state.
Populism has always existed in one form or another.
The advent of social media has probably encouraged parties and individual politicians to run to where the electorate (or those shouting the loudest) appears to be.
In former times, the politician took the people to the argument and led public debate - now, the political process is reactive and the debate is "led" by tweets and blogs. To be honest, most social media is a form of verbal lunacy and while there's little harm in allowing people to rant - places like Speakers' Corner used to do that or town halls with ranting balconies - the rants themselves shouldn't and mustn't become the terms of engagement for the debate itself.
It's not those who shout on X who should be the leading the debate but those who aren't.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
Osborne chose austerity because he was heartless, why the LDs went along with it is another question.
Without increased taxation Labour are lumbered with austerity. Now that is a choice, a foolhardy one in my opinion. Good luck at the next election when deaf, dumb and blind kids are begging on the streets because Labour removed their PIP.
This Labour Government don't think on their feet. They could sell increased taxation (and borrowing) as a necessity post Russia-USA alignment .
Oh for pity's sake. Does the plight of the feckless Reeves show you nothing? Osborne chose austerity because the country was bankrupt with unpayable contingent liabilities for an overgrown banking sector and a complete collapse in revenues from that source. The Lib Dems went along because there was no choice. Just like Reeves is doing now.
Austerity was an ideological choice. Many commentators, and not necessarily from the left, are opining that austerity was a grave error. There were other options. There are now. One of Reeves and Starmer's biggest millstones is the spectre of the Truss-Kwarteng budget. The Germans are going balls deep into borrowing for defence investment. We could do the same.
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
I’m not convinced that Trump is killing populism stone dead or that voters are necessarily moving away from it. They may have growing reservations about the more extreme iterations, but I think they are still expecting and wanting a brand of politics that they see mirroring their concerns and addressing them. Both Labour and the Tories in their own way are dabbling with this of late - the Tories with their Reform-lite tendencies and Labour trying to shift the emphasis onto things like welfare reform and the “bloated” administrative state.
Populism has always existed in one form or another.
The advent of social media has probably encouraged parties and individual politicians to run to where the electorate (or those shouting the loudest) appears to be.
In former times, the politician took the people to the argument and led public debate - now, the political process is reactive and the debate is "led" by tweets and blogs. To be honest, most social media is a form of verbal lunacy and while there's little harm in allowing people to rant - places like Speakers' Corner used to do that or town halls with ranting balconies - the rants themselves shouldn't and mustn't become the terms of engagement for the debate itself.
It's not those who shout on X who should be the leading the debate but those who aren't.
There is one modern politician who really does lead public debate and changes their supporter's minds not just follows them.
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
I’m not convinced that Trump is killing populism stone dead or that voters are necessarily moving away from it. They may have growing reservations about the more extreme iterations, but I think they are still expecting and wanting a brand of politics that they see mirroring their concerns and addressing them. Both Labour and the Tories in their own way are dabbling with this of late - the Tories with their Reform-lite tendencies and Labour trying to shift the emphasis onto things like welfare reform and the “bloated” administrative state.
Populism has always existed in one form or another.
The advent of social media has probably encouraged parties and individual politicians to run to where the electorate (or those shouting the loudest) appears to be.
In former times, the politician took the people to the argument and led public debate - now, the political process is reactive and the debate is "led" by tweets and blogs. To be honest, most social media is a form of verbal lunacy and while there's little harm in allowing people to rant - places like Speakers' Corner used to do that or town halls with ranting balconies - the rants themselves shouldn't and mustn't become the terms of engagement for the debate itself.
It's not those who shout on X who should be the leading the debate but those who aren't.
There is one modern politician who really does lead public debate and changes their supporter's minds not just follows them.
Unfortunately its Donald Trump.
In America, currently, it's also Bernie Sanders. He's getting huge audiences In Red states for his rallies. There's no-one else
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
I don’t think the Lib Dems will make an effort in Runcorn.
The Ashcroft poll showed the LDs close behind the Conservatives - it would send a strong signal were the party able to knock the Tories down to fourth place. Again, worth noting of the top 30 LD target seats, 26 are currently held by the Conservatives.
Slightly surprised to see in recent weeks people stressing the need for the UK to build up an independent nuclear armoury who previously campaigned to get nuclear weapons out of Faslane
Circumstances alter cases.
One of the more interesting ones was the pivot by previous Peace Pledge Union people in the run up to WW2.
We are living in the middle of one, as some groups understand what Trump is really doing, in addition to the threat posed by Russia.
It will be very interesting to find who is left. There are all sorts of reasons, of course - some of them quite good reasons in the previous set of circumstances. And some of us (I hope my view, for one) will be too pessimistic on the other side - for all we know the legal system in the USA may get Musk and Trump under control.
Perhaps the USA will allow their weapons to be putchased for Ukraine on commercial terms for Ukraine, rather than go all out to neuter the possibility of any European help getting to Ukraine by refusing to sell us Himars, which is not even made in Europe.
We built the Florence Nightingale hospitals (I think that was the name) during Covid and did not need them. Was that an unnecessary insurance policy or a wise contingency we did not need?
The Nightingale hospitals were really hospices - very little in the way of facilities. Staff would have been whoever they could scrounge up with a little bit of medical knowledge. Even airline staff.
Their purpose was to prevent people dying in the street if hospitals got overrun (see Greece and Spain). Pretty much an indoor bed with an oxygen supply.
What was interesting was the ravening resistance to them being built, from within the permanent system of government - I knew someone whose career was destroyed because she pushed through completion of the one she was working on.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Spending on disability benefits has risen from around £1.1 billion in 1985-86 to £39.1 billion in 2023-24 in nominal terms, and from 0.3 to 1.4 per cent of GDP over the same period. Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi… obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/ obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
As a percentage of GDP, working-age incapacity spending has been roughly constant since the late 1970s. See Chart 1.3 from this: https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/Welfare-trends-report-October-2024.pdf Chart 3.7 also demonstrates that the benefits are either less generous or roughly the same as they have been since 2010.
There is a bit of a meme in the Spectator/Telegraph that this is all about younger people faking mental health problems. The evidence just doesn't stack up.
Trump is half Scottish of course and his victory has made the necessity of keeping unions and alliances even more vital.
Unless the SNP won a majority next year, outright or at least with the Greens and Alba which some polls have them falling short of and the SNP held the balance of power in a hung parliament it is hard to see an indyref2 happening for the foreseeable future
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
I don’t think the Lib Dems will make an effort in Runcorn.
The Ashcroft poll showed the LDs close behind the Conservatives - it would send a strong signal were the party able to knock the Tories down to fourth place. Again, worth noting of the top 30 LD target seats, 26 are currently held by the Conservatives.
If the LDs overtook the Tories in Runcorn it would see Reform win the seat with Tory tactical votes while LDs did not tactically vote Labour
Trump has not killed Scottish nationalism stone dead. The movement will continue, sometimes popular, sometimes less so. What was already dead was the possibility of success WRT independence.
Trumpism has however firmed up the earth on the grave. Not long ago then model of a successful small state within the EU and NATO, which Scotland could aspire to, were instances like Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.
No longer. Now it is everything to be overtly militarised, nuclear armed, and part of the UK/France/Germany/Poland bigger boys in the playground.
BTW, is Kate Forbes still around? The Tories could do with a decent leader.
Very true Lithuania, Estonia , Latvia all need some big state to take them over and milk them for sure. Belgium, Switzerland and many others as well all unable to manage and needing saved.
Slightly surprised to see in recent weeks people stressing the need for the UK to build up an independent nuclear armoury who previously campaigned to get nuclear weapons out of Faslane
Circumstances alter cases.
One of the more interesting ones was the pivot by previous Peace Pledge Union people in the run up to WW2.
We are living in the middle of one, as some groups understand what Trump is really doing, in addition to the threat posed by Russia.
It will be very interesting to find who is left. There are all sorts of reasons, of course - some of them quite good reasons in the previous set of circumstances. And some of us (I hope my view, for one) will be too pessimistic on the other side - for all we know the legal system in the USA may get Musk and Trump under control.
Perhaps the USA will allow their weapons to be putchased for Ukraine on commercial terms for Ukraine, rather than go all out to neuter the possibility of any European help getting to Ukraine by refusing to sell us Himars, which is not even made in Europe.
We built the Florence Nightingale hospitals (I think that was the name) during Covid and did not need them. Was that an unnecessary insurance policy or a wise contingency we did not need?
They weren’t hospitals - that was marketing. They were hospices to avoid the real hospitals getting blocked with people who couldn’t be saved. Fortunately we didn’t need them.
The ScotNats completely wasted Johnson. That was their shot. Now they will have to wait until there is an equally detestable PM in London. Bobby J. would fit the bill. SKS's Red Reform act is banal and disgusting in itself, but nowhere as good, for the ScotNats' purposes, as a truly loathsome tory regime.
Jenrick or Farage can refuse indyref2 as they will never need SNP confidence and supply
They probably fund themselves - the clue's in the name.
There have been plenty of examples of philanthrophy - wealthy Victorian business men built schools, hospitals and houses for their workers. Now, it wasn't entirely philanthrophic - they knew a healthier and more educated work force would be a more productive and loyal work force thereby increasing profits.
There were plenty of "company towns" built in the 19th and 20th centuries - the nature of business is now very different of course and this group probably aren't looking at that as an example.
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
I don’t think the Lib Dems will make an effort in Runcorn.
The Ashcroft poll showed the LDs close behind the Conservatives - it would send a strong signal were the party able to knock the Tories down to fourth place. Again, worth noting of the top 30 LD target seats, 26 are currently held by the Conservatives.
If the LDs overtook the Tories in Runcorn it would see Reform win the seat with Tory tactical votes while LDs did not tactically vote Labour
That's how you can explain it - that's not how the media would report it.
If he kills Scottish Nationalism it will be because he shows beyond dispute what happens when people vote for populist policies espoused by egotistical politicians.
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
Yes Scotland is uniquely the only country unable to run it's own affairs as a sovereign country, we have all those wonderful English MP's to tell us how our money is spent wisely after all.
We're doing a wonderful job of fucking it up ourselves. Aberdeenshire should get £43m a year more than we get from Holyrood. Not because of "the English", because the government allocate the money into the central belt. Glasgow gets the same per school student for school transport as we do. Despite one being a city where most students can walk to school and the other being a vast rural county where schools have more bus stances than town bus stations.
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
The ScotNats completely wasted Johnson. That was their shot. Now they will have to wait until there is an equally detestable PM in London. Bobby J. would fit the bill. SKS's Red Reform act is banal and disgusting in itself, but nowhere as good, for the ScotNats' purposes, as a truly loathsome tory regime.
Jenrick or Farage can refuse indyref2 as they will never need SNP confidence and supply
There's a part of me that wonders whether Farage will do what Winston Peters once did in NZ and instead of backing the party to which he once belonged, supported the other party.
Could a Labour-Reform deal happen? I wouldn't rule it out.
As you say, any notion of a second independence referendum would be off the table.
If Scotland feels threatened under Trump, we would be more protected within a strong Europe than an impoverished and uncaring (except for caring about our natural resources) UK.
In a way, Brexit has been good for Scottish nationalism. It shows that there can be a working land border between two countries on the same isle. And a working land border between the EU and rUK. The 'United' Kingdom will be united until it's not.
If Scotland feels threatened under Trump, we would be more protected within a strong Europe than an impoverished and uncaring (except for caring about our natural resources) UK.
Look, the UK holds the State Visit card which as we all know trumps (geddit?) all the other cards.
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
In a way, Brexit has been good for Scottish nationalism. It shows that there can be a working land border between two countries on the same isle. And a working land border between the EU and rUK. The 'United' Kingdom will be united until it's not.
Wonder if Cornwall will be first.
Cornwall is pro Farage
So are pockets of Epping Forest by the sounds of it.
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
The Times piece is not hostile to Farage.
I think his argument is that the readers and commenters are hostile to Farage because they are moderate centrist types therefore not the *real people*.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Spending on disability benefits has risen from around £1.1 billion in 1985-86 to £39.1 billion in 2023-24 in nominal terms, and from 0.3 to 1.4 per cent of GDP over the same period. Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi… obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/ obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
Multiple factors: We're getting sicker. Physical health concerns got dismissed as nanny state. The country is broken, many of us struggle to cope with it hence the explosion of depression and other mental health problems We're diagnosing stuff that didn't used to be diagnosed. Several members of my family are diagnosed autistic - would they have been in the past? I am on the spectrum but cope so no diagnosis. Not that Autism is a sickness, but for some reason we act like it is. Work doesn't pay, but if you're sick you're not unemployed and thus invisible. hence the systemic shift from long-term unemployment to long-term sickness
TLDR they undersampled the less Reform-friendly Cheshire villages. But even adjusting for this the poll would have Reform 3% ahead. I think this is a Reform win.
About his TWO golf courses in Scotland. Turnberry is sooooo last year. All the action is at Balmedie - the opening of a new course named after His mother means that the orange one is visiting us this summer, not the western imposter course.
In a way, Brexit has been good for Scottish nationalism. It shows that there can be a working land border between two countries on the same isle. And a working land border between the EU and rUK. The 'United' Kingdom will be united until it's not.
About his TWO golf courses in Scotland. Turnberry is sooooo last year. All the action is at Balmedie - the opening of a new course named after His mother means that the orange one is visiting us this summer, not the western imposter course.
Carnoustie is the second best course on the Open rota (at least, it was when it was on the rota).
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
When HYUFD is (although he hasn't realised it yet) throwing his weight behind Farage,- Reform the Tories are truly f***ed. Put a fork in them, the Tories are done!
Your post is a Damascene moment for me. Would HYUFD please put the lights out as he departs the Conservative Party.
An increasing number of people are covering the kind of issues related to Thiel, Musk, Yarvin and Vance, that I've been banging on about this week. This is a useful interview, which also introduces the excellent names. "nerd reich", and "tech reich".
The particular focus on some of their number's idea of the obscilescence and collapse of the nation- state, in this intervew here , is particularly interesting. https://youtu.be/S5hdGmhaDJk?si=i5jUICPDqmNbkHhU
It's also fascinating how much our very own, dear old William Rees-Mogg seems to have been an influence in all this madness.
There's many different sources confirming how influential his Sovereign Individual book seems to have been on the birth of the kind of techno-fascist, but also anarcho-capitalisr, influence we're seeing behind the new regime.
It's so rambling and inconsistent that it would indeed indicate the basis for current american 'thought'
Another beautiful but cold day. I have two weeks of business travel coming up, so of course I am working instead of enjoying the weather.
I'm deep into the planning stages of my politics YouTube channel, batting ideas back and forward to my partner in crime as we refine the concept. Entertainingly nothing yet about the practicalities of how we produce it (we live in different countries) - likely just record Teams / Zoom and dump the recording into Final Cut for editing.
This is going to be an interesting journey. I intend to be a LD candidate for Holyrood next year. Doing politics YouTube which is guaranteed to at best go beyond the party line and at worst tread on its toes...
Slightly surprised to see in recent weeks people stressing the need for the UK to build up an independent nuclear armoury who previously campaigned to get nuclear weapons out of Faslane
Circumstances alter cases.
One of the more interesting ones was the pivot by previous Peace Pledge Union people in the run up to WW2.
We are living in the middle of one, as some groups understand what Trump is really doing, in addition to the threat posed by Russia.
It will be very interesting to find who is left. There are all sorts of reasons, of course - some of them quite good reasons in the previous set of circumstances. And some of us (I hope my view, for one) will be too pessimistic on the other side - for all we know the legal system in the USA may get Musk and Trump under control.
Perhaps the USA will allow their weapons to be putchased for Ukraine on commercial terms for Ukraine, rather than go all out to neuter the possibility of any European help getting to Ukraine by refusing to sell us Himars, which is not even made in Europe.
We built the Florence Nightingale hospitals (I think that was the name) during Covid and did not need them. Was that an unnecessary insurance policy or a wise contingency we did not need?
The Nightingale hospitals were really hospices - very little in the way of facilities. Staff would have been whoever they could scrounge up with a little bit of medical knowledge. Even airline staff.
Their purpose was to prevent people dying in the street if hospitals got overrun (see Greece and Spain). Pretty much an indoor bed with an oxygen supply.
What was interesting was the ravening resistance to them being built, from within the permanent system of government - I knew someone whose career was destroyed because she pushed through completion of the one she was working on.
They were pointless without a plan for staffing them.
One of the lessons of Covid should be more resilience in the NHS, and that should include not operating at 100% occupation at all times. Planned surgery is cancelled every day at my Trust for lack of beds/ITU beds. Apart from the individual misery, it is very inefficient of surgical productivity.
It is a beautiful morning, our daughters lost cat has been found, one of our granddaughter's becomes a teenager next week and one of our grandson's is 16 next week
And then you realise that Trump is causing mayhem to the world order, every morning something stupid or idiotic is announced and you just want to go out into the garden and listen to the birds and switch off the tv and social media
I note this morning the Speaker has been indulging in tens of thousands of pounds of luxury travel and accommodation and mps are frightened to hold him to account, Reeves has been indulging in more freebies, Starmer is turning into a conservative leader whilst his cabinet revolts over disability benefit cuts and Reform, despite their internal warfare, seem to be riding high in the polls
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
When HYUFD is (although he hasn't realised it yet) throwing his weight behind Farage,- Reform the Tories are truly f***ed. Put a fork in them, the Tories are done!
Your post is a Damascene moment for me. Would HYUFD please put the lights out as he departs the Conservative Party.
I am a Tory but there is no chance of a Tory government without Reform support on current polls and vice versa
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Spending on disability benefits has risen from around £1.1 billion in 1985-86 to £39.1 billion in 2023-24 in nominal terms, and from 0.3 to 1.4 per cent of GDP over the same period. Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi… obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/ obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
Multiple factors: We're getting sicker. Physical health concerns got dismissed as nanny state. The country is broken, many of us struggle to cope with it hence the explosion of depression and other mental health problems We're diagnosing stuff that didn't used to be diagnosed. Several members of my family are diagnosed autistic - would they have been in the past? I am on the spectrum but cope so no diagnosis. Not that Autism is a sickness, but for some reason we act like it is. Work doesn't pay, but if you're sick you're not unemployed and thus invisible. hence the systemic shift from long-term unemployment to long-term sickness
What does nationalism have to do with it?
A quick glance on the internet suggests that somewhere between 11% and 18% of all pupils have some sort of special educational need. At these levels it suggests that what we have done is redefine what is the spectrum of the standard issue human being.
This is expensive, wasteful, excuse engendering stuff.
Obvious examples are redefining naughty boy syndrome as ADHD (do the professionals ever read William books or Tom Sawyer), and being a bit of a geek or highly introverted as some sort of personality disorder. Being extremely dim is also well within the range of the normal human spectrum, as is, perhaps, an abnormal interest in railways or the history of voting systems or a desire to vote for Mr Trump.
I wonder what would happen if we did a thought experiment based on that the figure needs to be about 1 or 2% of all children, not 18%.
In a way, Brexit has been good for Scottish nationalism. It shows that there can be a working land border between two countries on the same isle. And a working land border between the EU and rUK. The 'United' Kingdom will be united until it's not.
Wonder if Cornwall will be first.
Cornwall is pro Farage
Where d'you get that from?
And Good Morning everyone.
Reform got a higher voteshare in Cornwall than the UK at the last GE
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
When HYUFD is (although he hasn't realised it yet) throwing his weight behind Farage,- Reform the Tories are truly f***ed. Put a fork in them, the Tories are done!
Your post is a Damascene moment for me. Would HYUFD please put the lights out as he departs the Conservative Party.
He left one nation conservatives a long time ago
The nuance in his posts indicates pro Farage Trump leanings
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
The Times piece is not hostile to Farage.
It does make it clear though that Reform is a one man band, not a government in waiting.
It wouldn't be the car crash of Trump 2 but that's a very high bar. It would be a bizarre collection of Quixiotic and Pooteresque policies that are internally inconsistent. They would suffer the same fate as Trump, in that you cannot make an administration function when based on shock jocks and Fake News. It needs to be grounded in reality.
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
When HYUFD is (although he hasn't realised it yet) throwing his weight behind Farage,- Reform the Tories are truly f***ed. Put a fork in them, the Tories are done!
Your post is a Damascene moment for me. Would HYUFD please put the lights out as he departs the Conservative Party.
I am a Tory but there is no chance of a Tory government without Reform support on current polls and vice versa
So you are throwing your lot in with the fascists?
It is a beautiful morning, our daughters lost cat has been found, one of our granddaughter's becomes a teenager next week and one of our grandson's is 16 next week
And then you realise that Trump is causing mayhem to the world order, every morning something stupid or idiotic is announced and you just want to go out into the garden and listen to the birds and switch off the tv and social media
I note this morning the Speaker has been indulging in tens of thousands of pounds of luxury travel and accommodation and mps are frightened to hold him to account, Reeves has been indulging in more freebies, Starmer is turning into a conservative leader whilst his cabinet revolts over disability benefit cuts and Reform, despite their internal warfare, seem to be riding high in the polls
And we wonder why ?
Clue - NOA
How can I put this - if you step back far enough from the detail, the problems in our politics are clear to see. But waist deep in the system? Far too difficult.
Reform sit on the periphery, point at the obvious which gets ignored, and offer crayon solutions. The solution? Point at the obvious and offer solutions which *aren't* crayon
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
I don’t think the Lib Dems will make an effort in Runcorn.
The Ashcroft poll showed the LDs close behind the Conservatives - it would send a strong signal were the party able to knock the Tories down to fourth place. Again, worth noting of the top 30 LD target seats, 26 are currently held by the Conservatives.
If the LDs overtook the Tories in Runcorn it would see Reform win the seat with Tory tactical votes while LDs did not tactically vote Labour
That's how you can explain it - that's not how the media would report it.
They would report the winner ie Reform, the loser ie Labour and ignore the also rans like every by election
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
I don’t think the Lib Dems will make an effort in Runcorn.
The Ashcroft poll showed the LDs close behind the Conservatives - it would send a strong signal were the party able to knock the Tories down to fourth place. Again, worth noting of the top 30 LD target seats, 26 are currently held by the Conservatives.
If the LDs overtook the Tories in Runcorn it would see Reform win the seat with Tory tactical votes while LDs did not tactically vote Labour
That's how you can explain it - that's not how the media would report it.
They would report the winner ie Reform, the loser ie Labour and ignore the also rans like every by election
If the Tories come fourth, they'll get a name check.
Extraordinary. I see that Thiel has even written a later foreward for Rees-Mogg's book, adding a touch of Nietszche, from the German right, as the son of a man who travelled from Germany to South Africa to become a uranium- mining businessman with black slaves ; and a touch of Mao.
You can almost hear the James Bond music playing in the background .
"Medieval men despaired of the will. They thought of humans as wounded and weak. But they respected the intellect. They thought even humans, if we think carefully, have the power to answer the most profound questions.
Modern men worship the will, but they despair of the intellect.
It is only through a unique long-term awareness that looks back to Lenin and Stalin as well as forward to the Information Age that the Chinese Communist Party's leaders prevailed amid the trends analyzed by this book.
Those trends-winner-take-all economics, jurisdictional competition, the shift away from mass production, and the arguable obsolescence of interstate warfare are still at work today.
In truth, the great conflict over our megapolitical future is only just beginning. On the dimension of technology, the conflict has two poles: Al and crypto.
The ScotNats completely wasted Johnson. That was their shot. Now they will have to wait until there is an equally detestable PM in London. Bobby J. would fit the bill. SKS's Red Reform act is banal and disgusting in itself, but nowhere as good, for the ScotNats' purposes, as a truly loathsome tory regime.
Jenrick or Farage can refuse indyref2 as they will never need SNP confidence and supply
There's a part of me that wonders whether Farage will do what Winston Peters once did in NZ and instead of backing the party to which he once belonged, supported the other party.
Could a Labour-Reform deal happen? I wouldn't rule it out.
As you say, any notion of a second independence referendum would be off the table.
Not impossible but the quickest way to surge Tory, LD and Green voteshare would be a Labour and Reform government
What a gorgeous love in with Farage! My take away? Like Hitler in the song, Farage really does only have one ball!
I think it is not just the SNP that has a Trump problem. The comments under the Farage piece are brutal. OGH used to talk about polls being a lagging indicator. I think there has been a real shift in the past month and RefUK are now in serious trouble, which it may take the polls a little while to pick up.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
The interview was in the Times which is a Tory and LD or New Labour paper NOT a Reform paper so the comments would be hostile.
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
When HYUFD is (although he hasn't realised it yet) throwing his weight behind Farage,- Reform the Tories are truly f***ed. Put a fork in them, the Tories are done!
Your post is a Damascene moment for me. Would HYUFD please put the lights out as he departs the Conservative Party.
I am a Tory but there is no chance of a Tory government without Reform support on current polls and vice versa
That's roughly the logic which led to the Republicans surrendering to Trump.
You don't want a Labour government. Fine- I'm not overjoyed, beyond a "least bad turkey left on the shelf" sense that he'll have to do.
But there comes a point where awfulness trumps right wing soundness, as the Chancellor-elect in Germany has recognised.
Inviting his dad to be KIng of Scotland. After all, it worked with the Stuart dynasty. He'd want a new Glorious Revolution and MASA.
If ever evidence was needed of how quickly a dynasty could degenerate into etiolated inferiority, Eric & Don Jr are the living proof: Charles II (Spanish version) level.
Slightly surprised to see in recent weeks people stressing the need for the UK to build up an independent nuclear armoury who previously campaigned to get nuclear weapons out of Faslane
Circumstances alter cases.
One of the more interesting ones was the pivot by previous Peace Pledge Union people in the run up to WW2.
We are living in the middle of one, as some groups understand what Trump is really doing, in addition to the threat posed by Russia.
It will be very interesting to find who is left. There are all sorts of reasons, of course - some of them quite good reasons in the previous set of circumstances. And some of us (I hope my view, for one) will be too pessimistic on the other side - for all we know the legal system in the USA may get Musk and Trump under control.
Perhaps the USA will allow their weapons to be putchased for Ukraine on commercial terms for Ukraine, rather than go all out to neuter the possibility of any European help getting to Ukraine by refusing to sell us Himars, which is not even made in Europe.
We built the Florence Nightingale hospitals (I think that was the name) during Covid and did not need them. Was that an unnecessary insurance policy or a wise contingency we did not need?
The Nightingale hospitals were really hospices - very little in the way of facilities. Staff would have been whoever they could scrounge up with a little bit of medical knowledge. Even airline staff.
Their purpose was to prevent people dying in the street if hospitals got overrun (see Greece and Spain). Pretty much an indoor bed with an oxygen supply.
What was interesting was the ravening resistance to them being built, from within the permanent system of government - I knew someone whose career was destroyed because she pushed through completion of the one she was working on.
They were pointless without a plan for staffing them.
One of the lessons of Covid should be more resilience in the NHS, and that should include not operating at 100% occupation at all times. Planned surgery is cancelled every day at my Trust for lack of beds/ITU beds. Apart from the individual misery, it is very inefficient of surgical productivity.
As to the staffing for the Nightingales - there was a plan. Whoever they could find to hold the hands of the sick. And dying…
For the NHS - What about creating more staff? We’ve tried this one round the world - the NHS knows it’s future size and it’s demented that we don’t train staff to match.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Spending on disability benefits has risen from around £1.1 billion in 1985-86 to £39.1 billion in 2023-24 in nominal terms, and from 0.3 to 1.4 per cent of GDP over the same period. Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi… obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/ obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
Multiple factors: We're getting sicker. Physical health concerns got dismissed as nanny state. The country is broken, many of us struggle to cope with it hence the explosion of depression and other mental health problems We're diagnosing stuff that didn't used to be diagnosed. Several members of my family are diagnosed autistic - would they have been in the past? I am on the spectrum but cope so no diagnosis. Not that Autism is a sickness, but for some reason we act like it is. Work doesn't pay, but if you're sick you're not unemployed and thus invisible. hence the systemic shift from long-term unemployment to long-term sickness
What does nationalism have to do with it?
A quick glance on the internet suggests that somewhere between 11% and 18% of all pupils have some sort of special educational need. At these levels it suggests that what we have done is redefine what is the spectrum of the standard issue human being.
This is expensive, wasteful, excuse engendering stuff.
Obvious examples are redefining naughty boy syndrome as ADHD (do the professionals ever read William books or Tom Sawyer), and being a bit of a geek or highly introverted as some sort of personality disorder. Being extremely dim is also well within the range of the normal human spectrum, as is, perhaps, an abnormal interest in railways or the history of voting systems or a desire to vote for Mr Trump.
I wonder what would happen if we did a thought experiment based on that the figure needs to be about 1 or 2% of all children, not 18%.
There is an easier diagnosis - various conditions didn't used to be diagnosed, and we used to actually fund and staff the system to cope.
Imagine a school system. Where the buildings are fit for purpose (not falling down / heating stuck on full / not reliant on portacabin classrooms) and there are sufficient teachers and assistants.
Instead of having to spend more cash mopping up the chaos, we spend less cash doing it properly. Kids with SEND can be disruptive when the school doesn't have enough staff - give them the resources and it's easier. And I say that with close family members who are SEND.
Another beautiful but cold day. I have two weeks of business travel coming up, so of course I am working instead of enjoying the weather.
I'm deep into the planning stages of my politics YouTube channel, batting ideas back and forward to my partner in crime as we refine the concept. Entertainingly nothing yet about the practicalities of how we produce it (we live in different countries) - likely just record Teams / Zoom and dump the recording into Final Cut for editing.
This is going to be an interesting journey. I intend to be a LD candidate for Holyrood next year. Doing politics YouTube which is guaranteed to at best go beyond the party line and at worst tread on its toes...
As any good representative should do.
Remember the golden mantra.
Constituents first Beliefs second Party a long way third Personal gain falling off the bottom.
@TSE is making the error of assuming that anything about Scottish independence is rational or responsive to reason. It's not. Its driven by emotion and a sense of identity and resentment. The current unpopularity of the Labour government in Scotland is a concern. Labour are, of course, finding out that the Tories didn't make cuts (just) because they were nasty but because they had no choice. We have already had the WFA and now Labour are going after the allegedly sick. Personally, I am expecting support for independence to rise somewhat.
That's PAWHP to you.
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Spending on disability benefits has risen from around £1.1 billion in 1985-86 to £39.1 billion in 2023-24 in nominal terms, and from 0.3 to 1.4 per cent of GDP over the same period. Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi… obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/ obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
As a percentage of GDP, working-age incapacity spending has been roughly constant since the late 1970s. See Chart 1.3 from this: https://obr.uk/docs/dlm_uploads/Welfare-trends-report-October-2024.pdf Chart 3.7 also demonstrates that the benefits are either less generous or roughly the same as they have been since 2010.
There is a bit of a meme in the Spectator/Telegraph that this is all about younger people faking mental health problems. The evidence just doesn't stack up.
Yes, and surely the answer to increasing numbers on disability, particularly for mental health issues, is to improve the dire state of mental health services. Early intervention rather than interminable waiting lists as a way of preventing an acute crisis from becoming a lasting disability. There should be some societal change too, particularly on Social Media and screen time generally.
If you want to tackle the Disability benefit expense then tackle the cause rather than the victims.
Comments
The first ever first post on PB that is on topic.
Good morning everyone, and I hadn't seen this one - which is quite good.
(Source in a montage of protest: https://youtu.be/Zxt1soiJYGQ?t=46 )
"Winner Nuremburg Film Festival."
Background: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/elon-musk-fake-ads-tube-london-b2715053.html
We see this happening in a number of countries, including England, where voters are tiptoeing away that brand of politics. Trump is an ill wind that maybe brings a little good.
(Oh, and Red Bull, remind me again about how Perez was underperforming?)
100 billion for climate protection
The infrastructure fund to be only used for "new" projects
The Bundesländer (where Greens form part of 6 state governments) also allowed to borrow.
The legislation will probably pass in the Bundestag on Tuesday, but could still be very close as there could be a few dissenters from within these parties but I think not enough to prevent the 2 thirds majority needed.
In the Bundesrat they probably still need the additional approval of the Freie Wähler, who aren't keen on government debt, but I guess they can be bought off somehow.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XITJ4zgYOg0
Wonder if Cornwall will be first.
Independence for London? It has been discussed - there's a general view London (basically to the M25 - there's a natural frontier if there ever was one) would be fine as an independent city state.
On more important matters, on the day I become Supreme Liberal Centrist Dictator (yes, I recognise both the irony and the paradox), my first act will be to outlaw hyperbole.
I read this morning on my news feed the UK has been "rocked by a major earthquake in North Yorkshire". I'm more than intrigued only to find out such earth-shattering (literally) event was 1.0 on the Richter Scale.
1.0? You wouldn't feel it let alone fall out of bed for it. Yes, it can be measured by the geological surveys but, "a major earthquake" ? It's up there with a 20 point fall in the FTSE 100 being called a "crash", a 0.1% decline in GDP being called a "slump" and a one point rise for Reform in an opinion poll a "surge".
So, yes, outlaw hyperbole and take exaggeration with it though that will be a billion times harder...
An increasing number of people are covering the kind of issues related to Thiel, Musk, Yarvin and Vance, that I've been banging on about this week. This is a useful interview, which also introduces the excellent names.
"nerd reich", and "tech reich".
The particular focus on some of their number's idea of the obscilescence and collapse of the nation-
state, in this intervew here , is particularly interesting.
https://youtu.be/S5hdGmhaDJk?si=i5jUICPDqmNbkHhU
Interesting interview with Farage here, for example.
https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/nigel-farage-interview-next-prime-minister-reform-n2qjk03dt
Trumpism has however firmed up the earth on the grave. Not long ago then model of a successful small state within the EU and NATO, which Scotland could aspire to, were instances like Lithuania, Estonia and Latvia.
No longer. Now it is everything to be overtly militarised, nuclear armed, and part of the UK/France/Germany/Poland bigger boys in the playground.
BTW, is Kate Forbes still around? The Tories could do with a decent leader.
And this, despite Witkoff coming for a pre-arranged meeting on matters of war and peace.
Then, he sent Trump's special envoy home with a deliberately impossible list of demands, designed to be nothing but an insult...
https://x.com/IAPonomarenko/status/1900626491689369828
I agree though on Brexit and the fundamental questions around currency and the border. It is very difficult to swerve these issues. Otoh, energy prices in Scotland are absurdly high for a country that still produces oil and gas, exports 1/3 of its electicity generation, and has 60GW of renewables in the construction pipeline (up from 15GW now). A Scotland with such abundant energy has the opportunity to become as rich as Norway - will we miss that chance for the second time?
I am instintively unionist, but even I am developing a serious grievance over this. If Reform form part of the next government, or there is any equivocation on renewables or energy market reform, then I can see Indy starting to pick up momentum again.
There's many different sources confirming how influential his Sovereign Individual book seems to have been on the birth of the kind of techno-fascist, but also anarcho-capitalisr, influence we're seeing behind the new regime.
Reform will not win the by-election. I think the only threat to Labour would be if the Lib Dems get a Shropshire North style pick up. Anecdotally the Lib Dems are picking up a bit of momentum elsewhere, maybe with a good candidate, Mark Pack might fancy his chances in Runcorn.
One of the more interesting ones was the pivot by previous Peace Pledge Union people in the run up to WW2.
We are living in the middle of one, as some groups understand what Trump is really doing, in addition to the threat posed by Russia.
It will be very interesting to find who is left. There are all sorts of reasons, of course - some of them quite good reasons in the previous set of circumstances. And some of us (I hope my view, for one) will be too pessimistic on the other side - for all we know the legal system in the USA may get Musk and Trump under control.
Perhaps the USA will allow their weapons to be putchased for Ukraine on commercial terms for Ukraine, rather than go all out to neuter the possibility of any European help getting to Ukraine by refusing to sell us Himars, which is not even made in Europe.
We built the Florence Nightingale hospitals (I think that was the name) during Covid and did not need them. Was that an unnecessary insurance policy or a wise contingency we did not need?
Allegedly sick? The current caseload is perfectly in line with a long-term trend from 2012 onward for physical and mental disability. I don't think there is any evidence that fraud has had a material impact on the numbers. This is just what happens when the NHS gets swamped by those with long-term chronic conditions, and fails to get working-age people back on their feet (or prevent them falling over in the first place via Public Health).
Without increased taxation Labour are lumbered with austerity. Now that is a choice, a foolhardy one in my opinion. Good luck at the next election when deaf, dumb and blind kids are begging on the streets because Labour removed their PIP.
This Labour Government don't think on their feet. They could sell increased taxation (and borrowing) as a necessity post Russia-USA alignment .
If Labour in Westminster are offering austerity for Scotland whilst the SNP can offer free Moms and apple pie why not go it alone. Is Trump even relevant?
Welfare spending: disability benefits - Office for Budget Responsibi…
obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability-benefits/
obr.uk/forecasts-in-depth/tax-by-tax-spend-by-spend/welfare-spending-disability
Are we really that much sicker? Or did we just neglect a lot of people who needed help in 1985? Or a bit of both?
I agree that the gross inadequacies of the NHS is aggravating the situation. It is probably a reflection of my age but the number of people I know who have gone private for hip and knee replacements rather than living years in pain waiting their turn is remarkable.
This is a complicated mess but it will be so easy for the Nationalists to blame those awful London people and claim, once again, Nirvana is within reach. One thing is clear, the trend on this is not sustainable.
‘All roads lead to Westminster’
https://youtu.be/Tlw5ItLJlyc?si=PXwbeNWIA9riIvbj
Donald Trump's son Eric holds talks with John Swinney
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cvgw118nlkeo.amp
The advent of social media has probably encouraged parties and individual politicians to run to where the electorate (or those shouting the loudest) appears to be.
In former times, the politician took the people to the argument and led public debate - now, the political process is reactive and the debate is "led" by tweets and blogs. To be honest, most social media is a form of verbal lunacy and while there's little harm in allowing people to rant - places like Speakers' Corner used to do that or town halls with ranting balconies - the rants themselves shouldn't and mustn't become the terms of engagement for the debate itself.
It's not those who shout on X who should be the leading the debate but those who aren't.
Unfortunately its Donald Trump.
In Red states for his rallies. There's no-one else
Their purpose was to prevent people dying in the street if hospitals got overrun (see Greece and Spain). Pretty much an indoor bed with an oxygen supply.
What was interesting was the ravening resistance to them being built, from within the permanent system of government - I knew someone whose career was destroyed because she pushed through completion of the one she was working on.
There is a bit of a meme in the Spectator/Telegraph that this is all about younger people faking mental health problems. The evidence just doesn't stack up.
Unless the SNP won a majority next year, outright or at least with the Greens and Alba which some polls have them falling short of and the SNP held the balance of power in a hung parliament it is hard to see an indyref2 happening for the foreseeable future
🙄
https://x.com/patmillsuk/status/1900491659470660048?s=61
Who funds this lot I wonder.
https://x.com/crimeldn/status/1900637803739767012?s=61
Contingency plan…
There have been plenty of examples of philanthrophy - wealthy Victorian business men built schools, hospitals and houses for their workers. Now, it wasn't entirely philanthrophic - they knew a healthier and more educated work force would be a more productive and loyal work force thereby increasing profits.
There were plenty of "company towns" built in the 19th and 20th centuries - the nature of business is now very different of course and this group probably aren't looking at that as an example.
I suspect that most millionaires don’t define themselves as “super rich”
https://x.com/thetimes/status/1900478808643277189
It is not pro Reform media like the Mail, Sun, Telegraph or GB news.
The Ashcroft poll had Reform winning the by election
Could a Labour-Reform deal happen? I wouldn't rule it out.
As you say, any notion of a second independence referendum would be off the table.
We're getting sicker. Physical health concerns got dismissed as nanny state. The country is broken, many of us struggle to cope with it hence the explosion of depression and other mental health problems
We're diagnosing stuff that didn't used to be diagnosed. Several members of my family are diagnosed autistic - would they have been in the past? I am on the spectrum but cope so no diagnosis. Not that Autism is a sickness, but for some reason we act like it is.
Work doesn't pay, but if you're sick you're not unemployed and thus invisible. hence the systemic shift from long-term unemployment to long-term sickness
What does nationalism have to do with it?
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cx2xjd41g33o
https://britainelects.substack.com/p/ashcroft-poll-puts-reform-ahead-in
TLDR they undersampled the less Reform-friendly Cheshire villages. But even adjusting for this the poll would have Reform 3% ahead. I think this is a Reform win.
And Good Morning everyone.
in them, the Tories are done!
Your post is a Damascene moment for me. Would HYUFD please put the lights out as he departs the Conservative Party.
I'm deep into the planning stages of my politics YouTube channel, batting ideas back and forward to my partner in crime as we refine the concept. Entertainingly nothing yet about the practicalities of how we produce it (we live in different countries) - likely just record Teams / Zoom and dump the recording into Final Cut for editing.
This is going to be an interesting journey. I intend to be a LD candidate for Holyrood next year. Doing politics YouTube which is guaranteed to at best go beyond the party line and at worst tread on its toes...
One of the lessons of Covid should be more resilience in the NHS, and that should include not operating at 100% occupation at all times. Planned surgery is cancelled every day at my Trust for lack of beds/ITU beds. Apart from the individual misery, it is very inefficient of surgical productivity.
It is a beautiful morning, our daughters lost cat has been found, one of our granddaughter's becomes a teenager next week and one of our grandson's is 16 next week
And then you realise that Trump is causing mayhem to the world order, every morning something stupid or idiotic is announced and you just want to go out into the garden and listen to the birds and switch off the tv and social media
I note this morning the Speaker has been indulging in tens of thousands of pounds of luxury travel and accommodation and mps are frightened to hold him to account, Reeves has been indulging in more freebies, Starmer is turning into a conservative leader whilst his cabinet revolts over disability benefit cuts and Reform, despite their internal warfare, seem to be riding high in the polls
And we wonder why ?
Clue - NOA
This is expensive, wasteful, excuse engendering stuff.
Obvious examples are redefining naughty boy syndrome as ADHD (do the professionals ever read William books or Tom Sawyer), and being a bit of a geek or highly introverted as some sort of personality disorder. Being extremely dim is also well within the range of the normal human spectrum, as is, perhaps, an abnormal interest in railways or the history of voting systems or a desire to vote for Mr Trump.
I wonder what would happen if we did a thought experiment based on that the figure needs to be about 1 or 2% of all children, not 18%.
The nuance in his posts indicates pro Farage Trump leanings
It wouldn't be the car crash of Trump 2 but that's a very high bar. It would be a bizarre collection of Quixiotic and Pooteresque policies that are internally inconsistent. They would suffer the same fate as Trump, in that you cannot make an administration function when based on shock jocks and Fake News. It needs to be grounded in reality.
Reform sit on the periphery, point at the obvious which gets ignored, and offer crayon solutions. The solution? Point at the obvious and offer solutions which *aren't* crayon
You can almost hear the James Bond music playing in the background .
"Medieval men despaired of the will. They thought of humans as wounded and weak. But they respected the intellect. They thought even humans, if we think carefully, have the power to answer the most profound questions.
Modern men worship the will, but they
despair of the intellect.
It is only through a unique long-term awareness that looks back to Lenin and Stalin as well as forward to the Information Age that the Chinese Communist Party's leaders prevailed amid the trends analyzed by this book.
Those trends-winner-take-all economics, jurisdictional competition, the shift away from mass production, and the arguable obsolescence of interstate warfare are still at work today.
In truth, the great conflict over our megapolitical future is only just beginning. On the dimension of technology, the conflict has two poles: Al and crypto.
Peter Thiel
January 6, 2020 - Los Angeles
voteshare would be a Labour and Reform government
You don't want a Labour government. Fine- I'm not overjoyed, beyond a "least bad turkey left on the shelf" sense that he'll have to do.
But there comes a point where awfulness trumps right wing soundness, as the Chancellor-elect in Germany has recognised.
For the NHS - What about creating more staff? We’ve tried this one round the world - the NHS knows it’s future size and it’s demented that we don’t train staff to match.
"Islamic State leader in Iraq and Syria killed, US says - BBC News" https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c9q451y218go
I'd wait longer but my time today is very limited. Qualifying did give me several ideas, though.
Imagine a school system. Where the buildings are fit for purpose (not falling down / heating stuck on full / not reliant on portacabin classrooms) and there are sufficient teachers and assistants.
Instead of having to spend more cash mopping up the chaos, we spend less cash doing it properly. Kids with SEND can be disruptive when the school doesn't have enough staff - give them the resources and it's easier. And I say that with close family members who are SEND.
Remember the golden mantra.
Constituents first
Beliefs second
Party a long way third
Personal gain falling off the bottom.
If you want to tackle the Disability benefit expense then tackle the cause rather than the victims.