Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Whatever else BoJo might have done he’s failed to convince many on Brexit – politicalbetting.com

2456

Comments

  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 9,264

    I think you're forgetting something, in your haste to blame Remain. From about the mid 90's onwards there was a drip drip drip of anti Brussels material from the Telegraph, Mail and Express and virulently from the Sun. Boris' articles about bendy bananas and the like created a mind-set.
    That's true. But there was no real effort to counter any of that, as far as I could see. Most of it was palpable nonsense, but the pro-EU response was to ignore it as the preoccupation of fruitcakes, loonies and closet racists, which it was - of course - for a time. But failing to counter it, well, we can see the consequences. For most people the EU was a peripheral issue, but what they had heard about it was mostly negative (and untrue, but that didn't matter really).
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 38,507
    edited July 2021

    BUT BUT the idiot at the Times has stuck his ruler through the data and said if this continues when we hit 200k cases we will have 4000+ a day going into hospital....
    It could be worse. At current rates of increase we could have 1.3 m cases a day in 8 weeks, 6.2 m in 12 weeks.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    I think you're forgetting something, in your haste to blame Remain. From about the mid 90's onwards there was a drip drip drip of anti Brussels material from the Telegraph, Mail and Express and virulently from the Sun. Boris' articles about bendy bananas and the like created a mind-set.
    Where was the counter drip, drip, drip of pro-Brussels material from the Guardian, i, Mirror and others then advocating in favour of Ever Closer Union?

    Instead of pretending Ever Closer Union doesn't exist and vacating the debate to the Eurosceptics?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029

    Why?

    That bridge has been crossed.

    I don’t believe in rejoining. At least not given the current circumstances.

    As usual you suggest your political opponents are mendacious while Boris is widely considered the biggest liar in Westminster.
    Labour are the party of remain as is Starmer but politically it would be toxic to be honest with the public
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,079
    TimS said:

    I don't think I'm the only Lib Dem somewhat uncomfortable with this apparent drift into authoritarianism by some in the party (Layla is the most vocal and I suspect the most opinionated on this). Following the evidence is what we should be doing. Of course it means being sceptical of the ideologically driven "freedom day" stuff, but it also means accepting that state control over the individual should never be an end goal.

    I do think Moran is a bit of an outlier within the party on this though.
    I think she is an outlier on other things too. That's why I'm glad she's not leader of the LDs, even though she is more articulate and media friendly than Ed Davey.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,203

    Labour are the party of remain as is Starmer but politically it would be toxic to be honest with the public
    Remain is over.
    You lost, get over it!
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029

    They should be campaigning for the 3rd way - rejoin the EEA.
    Actually I do not have an issue with that but they wont
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 22,100

    100 million
    If I read that article right, that is what the company are spending. Whereas the BBC say this is the total investment and contains the taxpayer subsidy.

    Clear as mud.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029

    Luckily for Big G, he will not be paying for it.
    Treble (locked) G&Ts all round!
    You do know I oppose the triple lock and have said so on here many times
  • northern_monkeynorthern_monkey Posts: 1,640

    If he was being honest he and Labour would campaign to rejoin
    It'll be 10, 15, 20 years before that happens. The full folly of Brexit needs to be unveiled without a concealing cloak of Covid. The major players need to depart the scene. The famously elastic principles of the Conservatives will need to do (another) volte face.
  • MaffewMaffew Posts: 235
    TimS said:

    I don't think I'm the only Lib Dem somewhat uncomfortable with this apparent drift into authoritarianism by some in the party (Layla is the most vocal and I suspect the most opinionated on this). Following the evidence is what we should be doing. Of course it means being sceptical of the ideologically driven "freedom day" stuff, but it also means accepting that state control over the individual should never be an end goal.

    I do think Moran is a bit of an outlier within the party on this though.
    I'm in the same position as you. I was furious when I saw she'd been criticising the government on not giving more detailed guidelines on hugging around the 17 May relaxation. I do think, as others have pointed out, that she's a bit of an outlier. However, I'm seeing a lot of criticism of relaxations (including past ones) on social media from people I know are also party members. It's making my membership of the party increasingly uncomfortable (along with a couple of other factors).
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,422

    NEW: Indonesia reports 31,189 new coronavirus cases, the biggest one-day increase so far, and a record 728 deaths

    And their positivity rate is over 20%.......two people I know there have died - one incredibly a diabetic surgeon who refused the jab.
  • SelebianSelebian Posts: 9,264

    On this topic (and presumably others) she seems to be in the wrong party entirely.

    Terrifying to think she stood for the leadership.
    True. But then, so were Thatcher, Blair, Corbyn and maybe Johnson. Some of those, of course, turned out better than others.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,203
    edited July 2021
    It is not possible to Rejoin, and personally I am skeptical of EFTA for the moment too.

    All we can do - what we must do - is painstakingly rebuild a closer trading relationship.

    The future is Swiss, and perhaps there is a possibility in allying more closely with Switzerland and the EEA countries.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,266

    They should be campaigning for the 3rd way - rejoin the EEA.
    LD policy is that, with a longer term aim of rejoin.

    I am expecting it to take over a decade to achieve, but am ready for a long campaign.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 43,338
    Delors, von der Leyen, Juncker, Beethoven, your boys have taken one hell of a beating!


  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029

    Remain is over.
    You lost, get over it!
    I am completely over voting remain and support Brexit
  • logical_songlogical_song Posts: 10,033

    Remain is over.
    You lost, get over it!
    Doesn't stop it being a bad decision.
    Like electing Trump.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,079

    Israel data should be treated very careful. Its very small numbers across less than a months worth of observations. Much bigger data sets from PHE and ZOE app.

    Israel data is at the same stage as when the UK had that stat of 1/3 dying had been double jabbed....when it was from a dataset showing 12 in 52 people.
    Fair comment. I'll have a look at the PHE and ZOE data. I contribute to the ZOE data every day.
  • MonkeysMonkeys Posts: 766

    Doesn't stop it being a bad decision.
    Like electing Trump.
    Running Hillary could be described as a bad decision.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 79,234
    edited July 2021
    Welsh Week on week increase, expressed daily since nadir of 02/06/21 vs 26/05/21

    72.18%
    61.74%
    47.91%
    60.87%
    60.87%
    63.55%
    96.45%
    84.05%
    87.02%
    113.68%
    101.55%
    101.55%
    91.97%
    62.38%
    39.93%
    43.44%
    44.89%
    40.59%
    40.59%
    44.13%
    56.39%
    133.16%
    80.60%
    71.21%
    96.64%
    96.64%
    106.94%
    79.12%
    61.98%
    177.84%
    45.15%
    15.14%
    15.14%
    2.86%
    11.24%

    Goes from 297 cases week ending 02/06/21 to 4053 cases rolling 7 days ending today.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,852
    edited July 2021

    They should be campaigning for the 3rd way - rejoin the EEA.
    "Let's reinstate free movement and sign up to follow EU laws with no say."
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,526
    edited July 2021
    Barnesian said:

    Fair comment. I'll have a look at the PHE and ZOE data. I contribute to the ZOE data every day.
    The last time I saw the update, there were saying about 2000 cases a day were double jabbed out of 27-30k total cases.

    We again have to be careful, because even if you say 2 weeks gap from jab to calling it as an infection after fully vaxxed, a) some will have caught it within that 2 week gap, so there weren't and b) we know with AZN protection takes longer to kick in.

    But lets say for arguments sake, 2k in 30k is about the going rate at the moment after of those still catching COVID after being double jabbed.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,079
    Sean_F said:

    It could be worse. At current rates of increase we could have 1.3 m cases a day in 8 weeks, 6.2 m in 12 weeks.
    It's going to burn itself out by September without overwhelming the NHS. It's already topped out here in Richmond according to ZOE.
  • StuartinromfordStuartinromford Posts: 18,360
    Cicero said:

    You cant- the current situation is strangling the economy. SMEs in particular are losing as much as 3/4 of their previous trade. A new deal will have to be negotiated. If no deal now then the damage will slowly get worse until it will be clear that the slow puncture has pushed the car off the road.

    The voters will not be so split then, but are more likely to be calling for Johnson´s head on a stick.
    The other thing is to look at the age splits. Because, as usual the age splits are huge;

    https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/bul4ckm2bw/TheTimes_VI_Track_210617_W.pdf

    Right/Wrong to leave:
    18-24: 19/60
    25-49: 33/43
    50-64: 50/33
    65+: 65/30
    .
    If this goes well, those numbers will move and we will come to thank the wise baby boomers who made the right decision in the face of our scoffing.

    But if it doesn't go well, and given the way the electorate will change over the next 10, 20 years, how does this version of Brexit stick? Not will it, or should it, but how does it?
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029
    Pubs to stay open on Sunday to 11.15pm to cover possibility of extra time and penalties
  • eekeek Posts: 29,738
    Jonathan said:

    If I read that article right, that is what the company are spending. Whereas the BBC say this is the total investment and contains the taxpayer subsidy.

    Clear as mud.
    https://www.telegraph.co.uk/business/2021/07/06/vauxhall-owner-build-new-electric-vans-ellesmere-port/ has a clear article

    £100m from Stellanis, £40m from the UK

    And while it's clear that Stellanis are going to be importing batteries in the short term - it's clear that Stellanis's UK management know they need a UK battery supplier asap
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,203

    Doesn't stop it being a bad decision.
    Like electing Trump.
    Would that it was as reversible as electing Trump!

    Britain voted not “just” to leave the EU but to set fire to much of its post-war geopolitical settlement. The era is gone.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,636
    MaxPB said:

    Once again, the question is how many of them are unvaccinated by choice? In England we've been told today that 88% of people in hospital are unvaccinated or partially vaccinated. That's a big win for the vaccine programme and if, like England, the people in hospital in Scotland are majority people who have refused the vaccine then what length of lockdown will convince them to get it?
    You keep trying to blame those refusing vaccination [nice sleight of hand in the above by the way]

    -> but it's obvious that the vast majority of people without protection, are without full protection because they haven't got both doses vaccine yet/had it too recently.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029
    Foxy said:

    Of course.

    You supported Cameron and Remain now support Johnson and Brexit.

    When the party changes policy, you change. We have always been at war with Eastasia...
    I support the democratic vote
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,823

    Israel data should be treated very careful. Its very small numbers across less than a months worth of observations. Much bigger data sets from PHE and ZOE app.

    Israel data is at the same stage as when the UK had that stat of 1/3 dying had been double jabbed....when it was from a dataset showing 12 in 52 people.
    That was also an unadjusted bit of data. You can't simply take that stat and then get efficacy data because unvaccinated people are likely much younger and have fewer comorbidities. I think once those numbers were adjusted for risk factors it came out to over 99.5% efficacy against death.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,203
    Foxy said:

    Of course.

    You supported Cameron and Remain now support Johnson and Brexit.

    When the party changes policy, you change. We have always been at war with Eastasia...
    The annoying thing is that Brexit voters tended to be not those physically needing to prosecute the war.

    They voted to send their own kids to war with Eastasia.
  • GnudGnud Posts: 298
    edited July 2021
    FPT

    What is the difference between rates? For those of us who are not obsessing about comparative stats.
    Russia (popn 146m):
    17% >=1 vax,
    12% "fully" vaxed,
    deaths per day w/C19, av for past week: 669

    Ukraine (popn 43m):
    5% >=1 vax
    2% "fully" vaxed,
    deaths per day w/C19, av for past week: 27

    With such a high death rate, Russia should probably go on Britain's red list. (Tunisia and Bangladesh are already on it.)

    But for comparison: in Britain on 23 Jan 2021 (when vax figures were 9%/<1%), the 7-day average of deaths per day w/C19 reached 1250.

    The Russian curves are very different from and worse than the Ukrainian ones, despite much higher vaccination rates.
  • TazTaz Posts: 17,628

    100 million
    That is their reinvestment. It doesn’t say what the govt grant is.
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 54,852

    Would that it was as reversible as electing Trump!

    Britain voted not “just” to leave the EU but to set fire to much of its post-war geopolitical settlement. The era is gone.
    The post-Cold War geopolitical settlement is also on the way out, and there are advantages to not being tied into the EU system.
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,079

    The last time I saw the update, there were saying about 2000 cases a day were double jabbed out of 27-30k total cases.

    We again have to be careful, because even if you say 2 weeks gap from jab to calling it as an infection after fully vaxxed, a) some will have caught it within that 2 week gap, so there weren't and b) we know with AZN protection takes longer to kick in.

    But lets say for arguments sake, 2k in 30k is about the going rate at the moment after of those still catching COVID after being double jabbed.
    So if 50% of adults are double jabbed but it was totally ineffective you'd expect half the 30K to be double jabbed.
    As it is 2K rather than 15K that have been double jabbed and infected, that looks like 87% effective against infection to me.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,203
    Gnud said:



    Russia (popn 146m):
    17% >=1 vax,
    12% "fully" vaxed,
    deaths per day w/C19, av for past week: 669

    Ukraine (popn 43m):
    5% >=1 vax
    2% "fully" vaxed,
    deaths per day w/C19, av for past week: 27

    With such a high death rate, Russia should probably go on Britain's red list. (Tunisia and Bangladesh are already on it.)

    But for comparison: in Britain on 23 Jan 2021 (when vax figures were 9%<1%), deaths per day w/C1 reached 1250.

    The Russian curves are very different from and worse than the Ukrainian ones, despite much higher vaccination rates.</p>
    We should be taking note of this post.
    Because in two months time we’ll be suffering from the Vladivostok variant and PB Tories will be claiming that “nobody could have known”.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,792
    Foxy said:

    LD policy is that, with a longer term aim of rejoin.

    I am expecting it to take over a decade to achieve, but am ready for a long campaign.
    Although I think Brexit was the most pointless and stupid small brained policy enacted by Britain since we decided to give a guarantee to Belgium, I am not sure it is sensible to re-join. That said, if it happens in my lifetime I will wet myself (probably literally when I am that old) laughing at all the remaining swiveleyed Daily Express reading Colonel Blimps that will be so cross!
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029
    Taz said:

    That is their reinvestment. It doesn’t say what the govt grant is.
    Apparently 40 million
  • glwglw Posts: 10,367
    MaxPB said:

    That was also an unadjusted bit of data. You can't simply take that stat and then get efficacy data because unvaccinated people are likely much younger and have fewer comorbidities. I think once those numbers were adjusted for risk factors it came out to over 99.5% efficacy against death.

    That's what the CDC is saying. We will be in the same ballpark I expect. Vaccination is the only anti-Covid measure that matters now, everything other measure combined is of negligible effect in comparison.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,792

    "Let's reinstate free movement and sign up to follow EU laws with no say."
    You never let me know how those letters to the Corinthians are going? Maybe you have moved on to the Romans, or Timothy perhaps?
  • BarnesianBarnesian Posts: 9,079
    MaxPB said:

    That was also an unadjusted bit of data. You can't simply take that stat and then get efficacy data because unvaccinated people are likely much younger and have fewer comorbidities. I think once those numbers were adjusted for risk factors it came out to over 99.5% efficacy against death.
    I assumed approx 100% in my post.
  • northern_monkeynorthern_monkey Posts: 1,640
    '...US military spokesman Col Sonny Leggett...'

    Aided by Sgt Scarper, perhaps?

    'Afghan anger over US’s sudden, silent Bagram departure'

    https://www.theguardian.com/world/2021/jul/06/afghan-anger-over-uss-sudden-silent-bagram-departure
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Gnud said:

    FPT

    Russia (popn 146m):
    17% >=1 vax,
    12% "fully" vaxed,
    deaths per day w/C19, av for past week: 669

    Ukraine (popn 43m):
    5% >=1 vax
    2% "fully" vaxed,
    deaths per day w/C19, av for past week: 27

    With such a high death rate, Russia should probably go on Britain's red list. (Tunisia and Bangladesh are already on it.)

    But for comparison: in Britain on 23 Jan 2021 (when vax figures were 9%/ below 1%), the 7-day average of deaths per day w/C19 reached 1250.

    The Russian curves are very different from and worse than the Ukrainian ones, despite much higher vaccination rates.
    Treat Russian statistics with a mountain of salt.

    By 28 March the Russians had officially recorded 97,200 Covid deaths - but they had an excess death toll of 494,610.

    Puts our death toll of less than 120k really into context as to what could have been without vaccines.

    If they're officially recorded 669 deaths per day its entire plausible that real death rates could be anywhere between about 3000 and 4000 per day given past precedence.
  • algarkirkalgarkirk Posts: 14,012
    edited July 2021
    Selebian said:

    We come, I think, from opposite sides of the Brexit debate - you voted leave? But I tend to agree with everything you write on it.

    Successive governments, since Thatcher (and even hers in its later times) took the line that the EU was a shitshow, but that the positives just about outweighed the negatives. Even Blair, who was the most positive in my lifetime, I think, preferred not to talk about it. There was never, in my lifetime, a real positive case made for being in.
    Completely agree. I am a leaver, but was perfectly persuadable of the alternative. To be persuaded required lots of real answers. But one alone was critical: What is the destination in terms of sovereignty and statehood? That had to be a clear Yes or No.

    Others were How does its democracy work, and is it one? Is it a protectionist rich club? How does the voter change it? Why does it impoverish poor third world farmers? How can it function with some in NATO and some neutral? How does it defend itself?

    Once the Euro was established a single state was the unambiguous destination, but the EU and UK was in a spiral of silence and denial about the meaning of the obvious. And people made fun of those who pointed out the obvious. At that point a good cause was a lost cause.

  • RazedabodeRazedabode Posts: 3,106
    Good to see the Brexit debate continuing to be so horrifically entrenched. On here and in the wider public.

    Take the Nissan / Ellesmere announcement. Leavers will point at the remainer warnings and (probably justifiably) point out that the predictions were wrong. On the other side, remainers will point to huge government bungs to keep the business in the UK

    Rinse and repeat with every announcement
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527
    edited July 2021
    I have not been able to comment here since 27th June and have,therefore, been denied the opportunity to contribute to the post Batley & Spen discussions.
    I was surprised in two respects - that Labour held the seat - and the size of the vote for Galloway. Starmer owes Hancock a great deal - as he does to the Greens for having withdrawn their candidate. The narrow majority in no way justified the decision to hold the by election at this time. It was high risk and Starmer's good fortune owes everything to luck rather than judgement.
    Nevertheless, the result is in reality much better for Labour than implied by the headline figures - given the size of the Galloway vote. This was a seat which Labour failed to win in 1992 - relative to that year it still represents a gain! - and it seems reasonable to believe that without Galloway's intervention the Labour majority would have been in the order of 5,000 or so - probably a pro - Labour swing of over 3% since 2019. The suggestion that this was a good result for the Tories because the headline figures showed a further 2.9% swing in their favour is pretty ludicrous given the context. On the same basis, it could be argued that Chesham & Amersham showed a swing from Con to Lab of 4.35% because the Tory margin over Labour there fell by 8.7% - ie the Tory vote dropped 19.9% whereas the Labour vote fell a mere 11.2%. Such a suggestion would have been nonsense.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    You never let me know how those letters to the Corinthians are going? Maybe you have moved on to the Romans, or Timothy perhaps?
    Well you know what they say about one sinner that repenteth . . .
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,608

    Pubs to stay open on Sunday to 11.15pm to cover possibility of extra time and penalties

    In Wales? You're not going to be in the final. Or will you all be supporting Italy/Spain?
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,792
    Foxy said:

    Of course.

    You supported Cameron and Remain now support Johnson and Brexit.

    When the party changes policy, you change. We have always been at war with Eastasia...
    I have never been able to fathom the "my party right or wrong" approach. Useful for the likes of Boris Johnson I guess
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,203

    Although I think Brexit was the most pointless and stupid small brained policy enacted by Britain since we decided to give a guarantee to Belgium, I am not sure it is sensible to re-join. That said, if it happens in my lifetime I will wet myself (probably literally when I am that old) laughing at all the remaining swiveleyed Daily Express reading Colonel Blimps that will be so cross!
    The Belgian guarantee made sense.

    No, this is like trying to make the Tanganyikan ground-nut scheme a programme for governance.
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,810
    isam said:

    It was amazing at the time, and is amazing now. Elected on a ‘respect the result’ ticket , then voting down every version of respecting the result, with some starting new parties explicitly to prevent it happening, and others demanding another go at it. Incredible
    On the Labour side much of it was displacement activity from those who felt alienated under Corbyn. By which I mean people who were used to being influential in the party and now weren't. Umunna, Leslie, Campbell, these types. Their energy had to have somewhere to go, so they poured it into Remain. Even forming new parties or defecting in some cases. Yet for all their passion for Remain, they were more passionate about something else. Jeremy Corbyn not making it to PM. This is why when given a chance to bring down a Tory government, and get Ref2 and Brexit cancelled under replacement PM Corbyn, they chose not to.

    But at least Labour MPs had the excuse - the very good excuse - of being in Opposition. They had a Tory PM on the rocks and decided not to throw her a lifeline by passing her Deal. Hardly shock horror or a scandal. Ok, so we know where it eventually led, Trolley Johnson and Con 80, but there are counterfactuals. My favourite is no Benn Act, block the Johnson deal, block a GE, force the magnificent empty man to choose between a No Deal crashout and a long extension on the EU's terms. Either would have damaged him greatly and the GE, when it came, would have been a different story. But they bottled it. Tried to have their cake and eat it. Weren't sharp enough. Weren't united or ruthless enough. They allowed different and clashing agendas to get in the way. Paradise Lost - ah well.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,359

    The other thing is to look at the age splits. Because, as usual the age splits are huge;

    https://docs.cdn.yougov.com/bul4ckm2bw/TheTimes_VI_Track_210617_W.pdf

    Right/Wrong to leave:
    18-24: 19/60
    25-49: 33/43
    50-64: 50/33
    65+: 65/30
    .
    If this goes well, those numbers will move and we will come to thank the wise baby boomers who made the right decision in the face of our scoffing.

    But if it doesn't go well, and given the way the electorate will change over the next 10, 20 years, how does this version of Brexit stick? Not will it, or should it, but how does it?
    How much more integration will the EU undertake in 20 years?
  • ChrisChris Posts: 11,918

    That'll be @chris
    A million a week.

    That will happen in about a month at current rates of growth, and at current rates of hospitalisation the January peak of hospital admissions will be exceeded around that time.

    But you've all been hypnotised into thinking numbers don't matter any more, and who am I to spoil the party? Good luck.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,738

    Good to see the Brexit debate continuing to be so horrifically entrenched. On here and in the wider public.

    Take the Nissan / Ellesmere announcement. Leavers will point at the remainer warnings and (probably justifiably) point out that the predictions were wrong. On the other side, remainers will point to huge government bungs to keep the business in the UK

    Rinse and repeat with every announcement

    And the irony is that none of these announcements and subsidies have anything to do with Brexit - it's just the nature of that industry that you need subsidies as competing locations will offer them.
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,035

    On topic, who gives a shiny shit? Boris got an 80 seat majority. 19 months on, he still has an 80 seat majority. He is likely to have a majority close to 80 for the rest of his term, 2023/24.

    Therein lies the problem - you win a majority and can then do whatever you like but it comes from our unrepresentative electoral system rather than from the voters. It's a manufactured majority - in any other European country it wouldn't have happened.

    On the longer term EU issue there has never ever been a decisive majority for leaving in the way there was for joining. Whilst rejoining is clearly not an option in the short term the political base for it is already strong.

    The Tories own Brexit lock, stock and barrel and while that may have given them a short term advantage let's see how it plays out in the long run. Even at this early stage a plurality of voters believe that Brexit was wrong and many won't be voting Tory again in a hurry. They had better hope that Brexit delivers enough to keep their new best friends in places like Hartlepool on board.
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 22,203
    algarkirk said:

    Completely agree. I am a leaver, but was perfectly persuadable of the alternative. To be persuaded required lots of real answers. But one alone was critical: What is the destination in terms of sovereignty and statehood? That had to be a clear Yes or No.

    Others were How does its democracy work, and is it one? Is it a protectionist rich club? How does the voter change it? Why does it impoverish poor third world farmers? How can it function with some in NATO and some neutral? How does it defend itself?

    Once the Euro was established a single state was the unambiguous destination, but the EU and UK was in a spiral of silence and denial about the meaning of the obvious. And people made fun of those who pointed out the obvious. At that point a good cause was a lost cause.
    Good questions, your first especially, which the Remain campaign totally failed to anticipate or answer.
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 65,029
    edited July 2021

    In Wales? You're not going to be in the final. Or will you all be supporting Italy/Spain?
    As I am Welsh on my Mother's side and English on my Father's side I will be rooting for England 100%
  • FrancisUrquhartFrancisUrquhart Posts: 83,526
    edited July 2021
    Independent SAGE would be proud of this statistical manipulation....

    The wage bill for all on air talent has been cut by 10% overall to £130m, down from £144m last year....

    However, many stars do not appear on the list because the corporation's commercial arm, BBC Studios, does not have to publish its talent spend....

    Claudia Winkelman also disappears from the list, as Strictly Come Dancing isn't counted either.

    https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-57722068

    We have reduced our on air talent bill....haven't we done well....yeah but you bumped a load of big earners off that list and onto another one that we can't see and doesn't count for your on air talent bill.
  • Pro_RataPro_Rata Posts: 5,566
    isam said:

    It was amazing at the time, and is amazing now. Elected on a ‘respect the result’ ticket , then voting down every version of respecting the result, with some starting new parties explicitly to prevent it happening, and others demanding another go at it. Incredible
    What pretty much every MP in the 2017-2019 parliament did was fully justified by individual or party manifesto in almost every case, the exception being the handful of Tory no Brexit Tiggers. So the Tory no deal / bad deal duality, Labour's single market (equivalence) or bust, SNP/LD opposition positions all had electoral legitimacy, and all led legitimately to the downfall of the May deal.

    Add to it that the courts had stood back and handed parliament a quasi judicial function in terms of assessing whether the advisory referendum result was even valid - remembering that the SFO didn't complete its investigation into Banks's dealing with Russia until well into 2019, and a debate on how to tiebreak if no single specific deal could prevail. All were valid, honourable debates to have - debates on the nature of democracy.

    Where I'm with you is that, at some point, realpolitik should have kicked in amongst the remainers. Their routes to success lay in either forcing TMay to accept a second referendum, or getting enough support around an alternative figure to change the Brexit deal, or getting and winning a General Election. Corbyn stood in the way of pretty much all their options.

    I made a blame hierarchy at the time , saying remainers would be more to blame for No Deal and the ERG for No Brexit, by virtue of being wrong about the reality of their ability to force their position. May's deal was the possible out ball for either side. Now, perhaps the blocker to that was party politics and they knew it would likely come to an election and they would likely lose, but even if that was the choice the deal should not have been dismissed quite so airily as it was.

    Taking Johnson's deal as on the No Deal side - worse than that where May's deal had stepping stones to bridge and resolve the contradictions over years, Boris is now fudging all the same things but relying solely on an ability to walk on water (or have an EU pop down a stepping stone at an apt moment) to cross. Boris's deal has not avoided a single one the issues that May's deal planned a careful route through.

    What I guess I'm saying is that I regard what the remainers did as a strategic error rather than either a moral failure or a properly justified shot to nothing.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    algarkirk said:

    Completely agree. I am a leaver, but was perfectly persuadable of the alternative. To be persuaded required lots of real answers. But one alone was critical: What is the destination in terms of sovereignty and statehood? That had to be a clear Yes or No.

    Others were How does its democracy work, and is it one? Is it a protectionist rich club? How does the voter change it? Why does it impoverish poor third world farmers? How can it function with some in NATO and some neutral? How does it defend itself?

    Once the Euro was established a single state was the unambiguous destination, but the EU and UK was in a spiral of silence and denial about the meaning of the obvious. And people made fun of those who pointed out the obvious. At that point a good cause was a lost cause.

    Completely agreed. I agree with every single word of this.

    The sad reality is that some today would rather lie and pretend that Ever Closer Union is not a thing despite the Euro, see the dishonest remarks from Nigel earlier in this thread, than actually advocate for a democratic European federation as the end state to be in favour of.

    The only thing I'm not certain of is if the dishonest people claiming that Ever Closer Union isn't real are just lying to us, or if they're lying to themselves and actually believe that too.
  • pingping Posts: 3,805
    edited July 2021
    Can’t wait for the football - and I’ll obviously be cheering on England, but…

    My god, @2.66 England are a clear lay!

    Say it ain’t so
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,658

    Good to see the Brexit debate continuing to be so horrifically entrenched. On here and in the wider public.

    Take the Nissan / Ellesmere announcement. Leavers will point at the remainer warnings and (probably justifiably) point out that the predictions were wrong. On the other side, remainers will point to huge government bungs to keep the business in the UK

    Rinse and repeat with every announcement

    We did this yesterday and today.

    The bungs are tiny, not huge, by any reasonable international comparison.
  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,823
    Barnesian said:

    I assumed approx 100% in my post.
    I think once cumulative reduction factors such as reduction of spread by double jabbed people is accounted for it will be very close to 100%.
  • moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,814

    Indeed.

    After Boris postponed Stage 4 I said he's lost my support. But looking at the Lib Dems, especially but not just Moran, I couldn't see a liberal party I could support there either which is a shame, there's been a real vacancy on the liberal/authoritarian spectrum and the Lib Dems have just vacated that space entirely it seems.

    Now that Stage 4 is going ahead, I'm happy to start supporting Boris again. So long as he sticks with it and doesn't become authoritarian again.
    You sound like a victim of domestic abuse. "I know what you're saying. But he really does love me. He told me last night how sorry he was and he'll never do it again, and he only did it because of how much he loves me. And I'll never find anyone out there like him".

    There are other candidates at constituency level than Tory and LibDem. There are other candidates for Prime Minister by the end of 2021 than Boris Johnson.
  • FoxyFoxy Posts: 51,266

    Pubs to stay open on Sunday to 11.15pm to cover possibility of extra time and penalties

    Schmeichel is good at penalties 😇
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,359
    edited July 2021
    MattW said:

    We did this yesterday and today.

    The bungs are tiny, not huge, by any reasonable international comparison.
    Yeah, if you want to see a country giving bungs to companies to work in their country you only have to look at France who spend a whopping 50bn EUR a year on it.
  • RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 29,849
    Foxy said:

    LD policy is that, with a longer term aim of rejoin.

    I am expecting it to take over a decade to achieve, but am ready for a long campaign.
    I guess thats why I am a LibDem these days...
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    edited July 2021
    moonshine said:

    You sound like a victim of domestic abuse. "I know what you're saying. But he really does love me. He told me last night how sorry he was and he'll never do it again, and he only did it because of how much he loves me. And I'll never find anyone out there like him".

    There are other candidates at constituency level than Tory and LibDem. There are other candidates for Prime Minister by the end of 2021 than Boris Johnson.
    The nature of party politics is seeing the rough and the smooth and accepting a balanced package that may have elements you dislike but is better than any of the alternatives.

    There are parties other than Tory and Lib Dem but I'd oppose them even more than I would the Tories and Lib Dems. I narrow down to those two as they are the only parties I could see myself supporting.

    If a sane, liberal, centre-right party is available other than the Tories or Lib Dems then please point it out to me as I've not seen any alternative.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,608
    Chris said:

    A million a week.

    That will happen in about a month at current rates of growth, and at current rates of hospitalisation the January peak of hospital admissions will be exceeded around that time.

    But you've all been hypnotised into thinking numbers don't matter any more, and who am I to spoil the party? Good luck.
    The ONS reckons 87% of people have abtobodies. There's only 9 million to go. It has to burn itself out sooner rather than later.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    I guess thats why I am a LibDem these days...
    Who arranged the exchange to swap you for williamglenn?
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 44,620

    The Belgian guarantee made sense.

    No, this is like trying to make the Tanganyikan ground-nut scheme a programme for governance.
    Complete with old wartime tanks to do the dozing.
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    OllyT said:

    Therein lies the problem - you win a majority and can then do whatever you like but it comes from our unrepresentative electoral system rather than from the voters. It's a manufactured majority - in any other European country it wouldn't have happened.

    On the longer term EU issue there has never ever been a decisive majority for leaving in the way there was for joining. Whilst rejoining is clearly not an option in the short term the political base for it is already strong.

    The Tories own Brexit lock, stock and barrel and while that may have given them a short term advantage let's see how it plays out in the long run. Even at this early stage a plurality of voters believe that Brexit was wrong and many won't be voting Tory again in a hurry. They had better hope that Brexit delivers enough to keep their new best friends in places like Hartlepool on board.
    Europeans love the EU project so much that only 5.6m of them want settled status in Brexit Britain.
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,792

    You are the habitual liar not me.

    The entire point of the conversation with northern_monkey is that "Ever Closer Union" is literally the raison d'etre of the EU and something they never kept a secret even before we joined or before the 1975 referendum. Yet here you are now pretending that it was 'an aspiration shared by only a few Euro federalists and was massively on the wane as a guiding principle.'

    Deep down in your heart even you don't support Ever Closer Union it seems, you're unwilling to even attempt to argue in favour of it instead lying and casting aspersions that its not real or only a fringe aspiration. Which is why your side of habitual liars deservedly lost.
    Philip, I have never supported "Ever Closer Union", because it was always a meaningless anachronism. Anyone that knows anything about the EU (you clearly know jackshit about it ) knows that it was, exactly as I said, an aspiration of a few diehard euro-federalists, and it remains so. It was an anachronism like Labour's Clause 4, though unlike clause 4 no Tony Blair was ever going to remove it because it was and is bland and meaningless.

    As I previously said (which you conveniently ignored) France is never going into a full political union with Germany. Ever. Period. But your small EU hating mind will never be able to understand, Duh!
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,458

    On topic, who gives a shiny shit? Boris got an 80 seat majority. 19 months on, he still has an 80 seat majority. He is likely to have a majority close to 80 for the rest of his term, 2023/24.

    As Mitterand famously said when told his disapproval rating had risen to 82% "As I'm here for another four years that would seem to be their problem not mine'
  • turbotubbsturbotubbs Posts: 18,630
    Chris said:

    A million a week.

    That will happen in about a month at current rates of growth, and at current rates of hospitalisation the January peak of hospital admissions will be exceeded around that time.

    But you've all been hypnotised into thinking numbers don't matter any more, and who am I to spoil the party? Good luck.
    Apols for misquoting. Do you think it will be 1 million a week, or will the wave peak lower than that? My suspicion is it will not reach 1 million new infections a week as there are not enough people to infect (with pretty good, but not perfect protection for the double jabbed, some for single jabbed, and all those who have already had it). But we will see.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,359

    Philip, I have never supported "Ever Closer Union", because it was always a meaningless anachronism. Anyone that knows anything about the EU (you clearly know jackshit about it ) knows that it was, exactly as I said, an aspiration of a few diehard euro-federalists, and it remains so. It was an anachronism like Labour's Clause 4, though unlike clause 4 no Tony Blair was ever going to remove it because it was and is bland and meaningless.

    As I previously said (which you conveniently ignored) France is never going into a full political union with Germany. Ever. Period. But your small EU hating mind will never be able to understand, Duh!
    Are you sure? The proposal isn't that unpopular in either country: https://www.politico.eu/article/united-states-of-europe-germans-french-most-in-favor-poll/
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,035

    Europeans love the EU project so much that only 5.6m of them want settled status in Brexit Britain.
    That's a total non-sequitur, but I guess we should be used to that by now.
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,273
    ping said:

    Can’t wait for the football - and I’ll obviously be cheering on England, but…

    My god, @2.66 England are a clear lay!

    Say it ain’t so

    It ain't so.
  • moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,814

    The nature of party politics is seeing the rough and the smooth and accepting a balanced package that may have elements you dislike but is better than any of the alternatives.

    There are parties other than Tory and Lib Dem but I'd oppose them even more than I would the Tories and Lib Dems. I narrow down to those two as they are the only parties I could see myself supporting.

    If a sane, liberal, centre-right party is available other than the Tories or Lib Dems then please point it out to me as I've not seen any alternative.
    I am unfamiliar with the local parties or independents where you live but they'll be there. If not then stand against them. Meanwhile the greatest power you have in British democracy is via your MP. Write to them now and tell them in no uncertain terms that you will march on Parliament if they dare flinch to casual authoritarianism this winter to counter winter flu. This applies to a seat held by any of the Big 3 English Parties, given they now all seem to have identical authoritarian tendencies.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,219

    The ONS reckons 87% of people have abtobodies. There's only 9 million to go. It has to burn itself out sooner rather than later.
    87% of adults

    Given that this is only a few percent different to the number vaccinated, I would expect that number to be much lower among the under 18 cohorts
  • Nigel_ForemainNigel_Foremain Posts: 14,792

    Europeans love the EU project so much that only 5.6m of them want settled status in Brexit Britain.
    That must be up for the "Thickest Comment By a Nationalist Prize"
  • kinabalukinabalu Posts: 44,810
    edited July 2021
    justin124 said:

    I have not been able to comment here since 27th June and have,therefore, been denied the opportunity to contribute to the post Batley & Spen discussions.
    I was surprised in two respects - that Labour held the seat - and the size of the vote for Galloway. Starmer owes Hancock a great deal - as he does to the Greens for having withdrawn their candidate. The narrow majority in no way justified the decision to hold the by election at this time. It was high risk and Starmer's good fortune owes everything to luck rather than judgement.
    Nevertheless, the result is in reality much better for Labour than implied by the headline figures - given the size of the Galloway vote. This was a seat which Labour failed to win in 1992 - relative to that year it still represents a gain! - and it seems reasonable to believe that without Galloway's intervention the Labour majority would have been in the order of 5,000 or so - probably a pro - Labour swing of over 3% since 2019. The suggestion that this was a good result for the Tories because the headline figures showed a further 2.9% swing in their favour is pretty ludicrous given the context. On the same basis, it could be argued that Chesham & Amersham showed a swing from Con to Lab of 4.35% because the Tory margin over Labour there fell by 8.7% - ie the Tory vote dropped 19.9% whereas the Labour vote fell a mere 11.2%. Such a suggestion would have been nonsense.

    Yep, it was an excellent result for Labour and for Starmer. If told GG was getting 22% of the vote not a single serious pundit would have called anything but a clear Con win. Adjusting for GG it was Lab by miles. The seat is safe as houses for the GE. It shows progress from Dec 19, changes the narrative, and creates momentum. I've said for ages how I expect my 'Starmer Next PM' long at 8 to be layable back at 4 max quite soon, and I've been semi-kidding, but it's now the unvarnished truth.
  • eekeek Posts: 29,738
    I'm going to regret posting this tweet but

    https://twitter.com/gideonrachman/status/1412367708939862023

    Gideon Rachman
    @gideonrachman
    Amazing stat in this @sarahoconnor_ piece. The government thought there were 370,000 Rumanians in Britain; 918,000 have applied for settled status. https://ft.com/content/1c489fb7-2840-4810-b3e6-a036803edf5c via
    @financialtimes
  • noneoftheabovenoneoftheabove Posts: 24,273

    I would just comment that thinking Brexit was wrong does not automatically translate into re- join
    Quite. Brexit, particularly this Brexit was wrong. Re-join now, or even in 10 years time, would also be wrong.

    Hopefully over the next 5-10 years we can eject the politicians who led us down this path and rebuild a better relationship with the EU, but it should not be re-join.
  • contrariancontrarian Posts: 5,818
    OllyT said:

    That's a total non-sequitur, but I guess we should be used to that by now.
    The remainer's attitude is turning into the longest sulk in history.

    Britain's democracy is far from perfect, but its good enough that if the electorate really wanted brexit stopped, it would have been.

    Similarly, we are going back to freedom because that is what people want. Its not what the commentariat want. Or the opposition. But then these days their wishes and those of much of the electorate rarely coincide.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Philip, I have never supported "Ever Closer Union", because it was always a meaningless anachronism. Anyone that knows anything about the EU (you clearly know jackshit about it ) knows that it was, exactly as I said, an aspiration of a few diehard euro-federalists, and it remains so. It was an anachronism like Labour's Clause 4, though unlike clause 4 no Tony Blair was ever going to remove it because it was and is bland and meaningless.

    As I previously said (which you conveniently ignored) France is never going into a full political union with Germany. Ever. Period. But your small EU hating mind will never be able to understand, Duh!
    I feel sorry for you, because you're just embarrassing yourself now.

    You're in denial of that which everyone sane and honest can see: The EU is about Ever Closer Union. It is the very first line, very first principle of the project. You wish to deny that the French and Germans are seeking a political union while they make no secret of the fact that is what they want. Macron is up front, open and honest about his desire to see more EU integration so why do you hate that or deny that? https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/feb/15/emmanuel-macron-sets-out-10-year-vision-for-eu-with-call-for-more-integration

    That you are in denial just makes you look silly and petulant, not wise. It seems that you are the one who hates what the EU really is so you're trying to deny it and turn it into something it isn't. I don't hate the EU - I wish them well. If the French and Germans want a political union and integrated defence policies etc as Macron is calling for and as they've been building for the better part of three quarters of a century now then good luck to them. It is the logical end point of a single currency and unlike you it seems I wish them well. I just wish them well as our neighbours instead of trying to bring their project down from the inside like you seem to want.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    In Wales? You're not going to be in the final. Or will you all be supporting Italy/Spain?
    Denmark.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,132
    NEW: Sajid Javid delays removal of test and trace obligation to self isolation until August 16, a long time into school summer holidays.

    So more than a month to go of being pinged and having to stay at home

    https://twitter.com/SamCoatesSky/status/1412376163733884932
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,608

    87% of adults

    Given that this is only a few percent different to the number vaccinated, I would expect that number to be much lower among the under 18 cohorts
    Hmm. ONS ought to rewrite their top level blurb then (and there is no link from that page)

    Antibodies against coronavirus (COVID-19)
    The presence of antibodies to COVID-19 suggests that a person previously had the infection or has been vaccinated. In the week beginning 7 June 2021, the percentage of people that would have tested positive for antibodies is estimated to be:
    86.6% in England
    88.7% in Wales
    85.4% in Northern Ireland
    79.1% in Scotland
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,359
    eek said:

    I'm going to regret posting this tweet but

    https://twitter.com/gideonrachman/status/1412367708939862023

    Gideon Rachman
    @gideonrachman
    Amazing stat in this @sarahoconnor_ piece. The government thought there were 370,000 Rumanians in Britain; 918,000 have applied for settled status. https://ft.com/content/1c489fb7-2840-4810-b3e6-a036803edf5c via
    @financialtimes

    Government modelling was crap back in the early 2000s, too.

    The forecasts indicate that net immigration from the AC-10 to the UK after the current
    enlargement of the EU will be relatively small, at between 5,000 and 13,000 immigrants per year
    up to 2010.
    (although they do caveat this, this is the central prediction).

    https://discovery.ucl.ac.uk/id/eprint/14332/1/14332.pdf
  • MattWMattW Posts: 26,658
    edited July 2021

    I think you're forgetting something, in your haste to blame Remain. From about the mid 90's onwards there was a drip drip drip of anti Brussels material from the Telegraph, Mail and Express and virulently from the Sun. Boris' articles about bendy bananas and the like created a mind-set.
    I think the bigger question wrt EU is that it is a pig-in-a-poke.

    No common idea amongst its members as to what it wants, no idea how to get there (obviously), and a leadership that could be improved on by the Goodies singing Funky Gibbon.
  • RogerRoger Posts: 20,458

    Remain is over.
    You lost, get over it!
    Indeed and Rejoin has just begun. If the demographics are as stated and the old continue to die before the young it shouldn't take long
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 38,132

    The remainer's attitude is turning into the longest sulk in history.

    Brexiteers sulked for 50 years
  • moonshinemoonshine Posts: 5,814

    Philip, I have never supported "Ever Closer Union", because it was always a meaningless anachronism. Anyone that knows anything about the EU (you clearly know jackshit about it ) knows that it was, exactly as I said, an aspiration of a few diehard euro-federalists, and it remains so. It was an anachronism like Labour's Clause 4, though unlike clause 4 no Tony Blair was ever going to remove it because it was and is bland and meaningless.

    As I previously said (which you conveniently ignored) France is never going into a full political union with Germany. Ever. Period. But your small EU hating mind will never be able to understand, Duh!
    Most dispassionate observers contend that the Euro currency was a means to an end, an economic tool to force political alignment upon future crisis events. The survival of the sacred non-socialisation of cross country debts (and hence something resembling a common treasury) is really only in the eye of the beholder, effected through central bank chicanery. It's perfectly possible to see how France and Germany will in a decade or two have entreated something resembling a full political union, with evermore power up-volved to the central body, with other matters remaining devolved. It may not be called the Federated States of Europia but it's going to waddle and quack suspiciously like a duck.
  • MalmesburyMalmesbury Posts: 54,219
    eek said:

    I'm going to regret posting this tweet but

    https://twitter.com/gideonrachman/status/1412367708939862023

    Gideon Rachman
    @gideonrachman
    Amazing stat in this @sarahoconnor_ piece. The government thought there were 370,000 Rumanians in Britain; 918,000 have applied for settled status. https://ft.com/content/1c489fb7-2840-4810-b3e6-a036803edf5c via
    @financialtimes

    Is it just me, or spelling it "Rumanian" gives it a 1908, Times of London feel?
This discussion has been closed.