politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Is Corbyn at risk from the mother of all political decapitatio
Comments
-
If Priti Patel wants to get my support, and the support of the country, she should deport the cheat Steve Smith now.FrancisUrquhart said:
Lock him up, lock him up....ydoethur said:
If he's going to set them so the number 10 can put in any half century stand, let's not complain.FrancisUrquhart said:Convicts cheating again...
Steve Smith is fairly blatantly the man setting the field for Australia at the moment. He is still banned by Cricket Australia from holding a leadership position for another year.0 -
In a parallel universe somewhere, Miliband won the 2010 election and Ed Balls got to implement his spending programme. I wonder what Labour are saying there about austerity?NickPalmer said:
If youre looking for clarity you're looking in the wrong place (except on Brexit). Work with Labour? Well, maybe. But not a coalition. Well, not with Corbyn. Work with the Tories? Well, not over Brexit. With Boris? Well, it hasn't come up. Austerity? Was a good thing, but maybe too much. Time to stop it anyway. Well, within reason.Gardenwalker said:I agree with @rcs1000 upthread.
I want to support the Lib Dems, I *do* support the Lib Dems, but they need to get their shit together. There is no time to lose.
They need to be hammering just two messages:
1. Labour is enabling a No Deal Brexit
2. Lib Dem’s single minded policy is to enable a government of national unity which will call a referendum on an impartial, fully and fairly explained “Remain” and “Brexit”.
Oh and they need to junk the university fees, or find some other formula that means we are not saddling an entire generation with debts of up to £100k upon graduation. It’s their Clause 4.
I don't dislike the LibDems. Hell, I'm in coalition with them. But if you rely on them to do anything in particular nationally, you're building on sand.0 -
What is the point of Tim Paine?0
-
Like England miss Archer to mop up the tail, Ozzies miss Starc. Broad would be pooping his pants at the prospect of 95mph Starc bouncers and yorkers.0
-
He's a wicked keeper.TheScreamingEagles said:What is the point of Tim Paine?
0 -
It only takes shit owners a few years to destroy a club.
I still have nightmares about Hicks and Gillett, in the space of three years they took Liverpool from Champions League finalists to near bankruptcy.
If it could happen to Liverpool it can happen to anyone, so solidarity with Bury, Bolton, Coventry, et al.1 -
What this really is doing is putting Bairstow, Butler, Ali, the entire Australian top order except Smith and to a lesser extent Roy and Denly in perspective.
All they've done is knock the ball into gaps and they've out on a nice 50 at three an over.
Try to thrash it around and you get out and look a fool.0 -
TBF the major succession crisis wasn’t his fault.ydoethur said:
And shagging everything with a vagina.DougSeal said:
He could do worse than Charles II though. He had a reasonably good record in reconciling a deeply divided Kingdom.ydoethur said:
Albert Frederick Arthur George. Bertie to friends and family, took the regnal name George.OldKingCole said:
His grandfather was Bert, wasn't he?ydoethur said:
Apparently he wants to do what his grandfather did - call himself George VII to avoid any embarrassing parallels.OldKingCole said:
Aren't we looking at King Charles III before too long? Must mean something, although I gather he's given up the mistress habit.Byronic said:
Quite soon after Liam Fox's Book of Martyrs.DougSeal said:
So when do we get our Marian reaction followed by an Elizabethan compromise?Byronic said:
The Reformation is actually a very good analogy for Brexit, in multiple ways.alex. said:So in rapid succession we’ve survived the Blitz and are looking rapidly forward to the Reformation. Where’s it going to end? The Norman Conquest?
I envisage a time, quite soon, when rich, recusant Remainer families will have priest holes behind false walls, where they will hide Jolyon Maugham, or Anna Soubry.
Unless of course, your Jack W when he'll be Charles IV!
Charles is Charles Phillip Arthur George.
And, of course, the last king to prorogue Parliament and rule directly, although people often forget that.
And leaving a major succession crisis that erupted into civil war in two years and revolution followed by war in Ireland in three.
Apart from that, he was a dazzling success.
(Fun fact - if he becomes King, William will be the first descendant of Charles II to be King.)0 -
Starc's average is a bit shit since the Cape Town test, I cannot imagine why his average has increased.FrancisUrquhart said:Like England miss Archer to mop up the tail, Ozzies miss Starc. Broad would be pooping his pants at the prospect of 95mph Starc bouncers and yorkers.
0 -
Only in Test cricket would the commentators spend several minutes talking about an entirely different sport.
Ah, crikkit.
If we get a lead of 100 we win?0 -
He's a captain who won't encourage a young player to cheat. Seems like an asset for most teams.TheScreamingEagles said:What is the point of Tim Paine?
0 -
I have resigned from the Labour Party2
-
His persistent refusal to divorce his queen and marry somebody who could have children, or use the Henry VIII precedent to nominate Monmouth as his heir could be seen as an unfortunate mistake.DougSeal said:
TBF the major succession crisis wasn’t his fault.ydoethur said:
And shagging everything with a vagina.DougSeal said:
He could do worse than Charles II though. He had a reasonably good record in reconciling a deeply divided Kingdom.ydoethur said:
Albert Frederick Arthur George. Bertie to friends and family, took the regnal name George.OldKingCole said:
His grandfather was Bert, wasn't he?ydoethur said:
Apparently he wants to do what his grandfather did - call himself George VII to avoid any embarrassing parallels.OldKingCole said:
Aren't we looking at King Charles III before too long? Must mean something, although I gather he's given up the mistress habit.Byronic said:
Quite soon after Liam Fox's Book of Martyrs.DougSeal said:
So when do we get our Marian reaction followed by an Elizabethan compromise?Byronic said:
The Reformation is actually a very good analogy for Brexit, in multiple ways.alex. said:So in rapid succession we’ve survived the Blitz and are looking rapidly forward to the Reformation. Where’s it going to end? The Norman Conquest?
I envisage a time, quite soon, when rich, recusant Remainer families will have priest holes behind false walls, where they will hide Jolyon Maugham, or Anna Soubry.
Unless of course, your Jack W when he'll be Charles IV!
Charles is Charles Phillip Arthur George.
And, of course, the last king to prorogue Parliament and rule directly, although people often forget that.
And leaving a major succession crisis that erupted into civil war in two years and revolution followed by war in Ireland in three.
Apart from that, he was a dazzling success.
(Fun fact - if he becomes King, William will be the first descendant of Charles II to be King.)
He must have known James would be an impossible choice as King, for all James' qualities.0 -
The same was true with Siddle batting. He is no rabbit, but he isn't exactly a world beater and yet he stuck around for ages.ydoethur said:What this really is doing is putting Bairstow, Butler, Ali, the entire Australian top order except Smith and to a lesser extent Roy and Denly in perspective.
All they've done is knock the ball into gaps and they've out on a nice 50 at three an over.
Try to thrash it around and you get out and look a fool.0 -
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?Byronic said:
But the Lib Dems really will deliver a 2nd referendum, and really will campaign hard for Remain, if they ever get a sniff of power.
For millions of Brits, that is all that matters, all that will matter, for years to come.
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?0 -
*applauds*RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
0 -
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.0 -
I am 99% sure it will be to reapply ASAP, following a new referendum. So, no, it isn't ambiguous, in my mind.NickPalmer said:
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?Byronic said:
But the Lib Dems really will deliver a 2nd referendum, and really will campaign hard for Remain, if they ever get a sniff of power.
For millions of Brits, that is all that matters, all that will matter, for years to come.
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?0 -
I suspect post Brexit the LDs would initially apply to rejoin the single market and use that as a springboard to rejoin the EU if public opinion moved in that directionNickPalmer said:
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?Byronic said:
But the Lib Dems really will deliver a 2nd referendum, and really will campaign hard for Remain, if they ever get a sniff of power.
For millions of Brits, that is all that matters, all that will matter, for years to come.
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?0 -
Well, that doesn't come as a surprise after your posts yesterday. Clearly this is something that has been causing you a lot of angst for some time.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
From your posts, if it's worth anything I think you're making the right decision. It's obvious you were really not happy or settled with the way things were going and it was only causing you hurt trying to stay in. I hope you find it possible to move on.0 -
Thanks to James trying to reimpose Catholicism and being deposed we then had the Jacobite rebellions in favour of his son and grandson which developed after the arrival of the Hanoverians and the Act of Union which began the Scottish nationalist movement.ydoethur said:
His persistent refusal to divorce his queen and marry somebody who could have children, or use the Henry VIII precedent to nominate Monmouth as his heir could be seen as an unfortunate mistake.DougSeal said:
TBF the major succession crisis wasn’t his fault.ydoethur said:
And shagging everything with a vagina.DougSeal said:
He could do worse than Charles II though. He had a reasonably good record in reconciling a deeply divided Kingdom.ydoethur said:
Albert Frederick Arthur George. Bertie to friends and family, took the regnal name George.OldKingCole said:
His grandfather was Bert, wasn't he?ydoethur said:
Apparently he wants to do what his grandfather did - call himself George VII to avoid any embarrassing parallels.OldKingCole said:
Aren't we looking at King Charles III before too long? Must mean something, although I gather he's given up the mistress habit.Byronic said:
Quite soon after Liam Fox's Book of Martyrs.DougSeal said:
So when do we get our Marian reaction followed by an Elizabethan compromise?Byronic said:
The Reformation is actually a very good analogy for Brexit, in multiple ways.alex. said:So in rapid succession we’ve survived the Blitz and are looking rapidly forward to the Reformation. Where’s it going to end? The Norman Conquest?
I envisage a time, quite soon, when rich, recusant Remainer families will have priest holes behind false walls, where they will hide Jolyon Maugham, or Anna Soubry.
Unless of course, your Jack W when he'll be Charles IV!
Charles is Charles Phillip Arthur George.
And, of course, the last king to prorogue Parliament and rule directly, although people often forget that.
And leaving a major succession crisis that erupted into civil war in two years and revolution followed by war in Ireland in three.
Apart from that, he was a dazzling success.
(Fun fact - if he becomes King, William will be the first descendant of Charles II to be King.)
He must have known James would be an impossible choice as King, for all James' qualities.
Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP owe a lot to James IInd0 -
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.0 -
This thread is like the one David Herdson wrote a few years back, regarding that Ed Milliband would lose his seat in Doncaster.
0 -
It’s a shame that politics is in such a state that dedicated people who have pride in their party’s traditions feel the need to walk.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
1 -
I see the captain has brought himself on to bowl.0
-
If every Labour member opposed to Corbyn left, surely that would make it less likely he'd be toppled?Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.0 -
Seriously, Nick, there are perhaps people in this world who can accuse the Lib Dems of an ambiguous Brexit policy.NickPalmer said:
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?Byronic said:
But the Lib Dems really will deliver a 2nd referendum, and really will campaign hard for Remain, if they ever get a sniff of power.
For millions of Brits, that is all that matters, all that will matter, for years to come.
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?
But not Corbyn-supporting Labour activists. Take the mote out of thine own eye, etc. etc.1 -
Mote?! More like the entire Amazon Rainforest.El_Capitano said:
Seriously, Nick, there are perhaps people in this world who can accuse the Lib Dems of an ambiguous Brexit policy.NickPalmer said:
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?Byronic said:
But the Lib Dems really will deliver a 2nd referendum, and really will campaign hard for Remain, if they ever get a sniff of power.
For millions of Brits, that is all that matters, all that will matter, for years to come.
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?
But not Corbyn-supporting Labour activists. Take the mote out of thine own eye, etc. etc.0 -
That’s picking at hairs, though, isn’t it? You know this already.NickPalmer said:
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?Byronic said:
But the Lib Dems really will deliver a 2nd referendum, and really will campaign hard for Remain, if they ever get a sniff of power.
For millions of Brits, that is all that matters, all that will matter, for years to come.
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?
They are a pro-EU party and will be looking for an opportunity to rejoin. How and when that opportunity might arise will depend heavily upon the nature and the consequences of our departure, so it is unrealistic to expect a detailed plan right now.
How about you focus on Labour’s problem of apparently being opposed to a Tory managed Brexit but in favour of a Labour managed one?0 -
I have been deeply unhappy for a few months now. But finding excuses as to why I should keep going, despite that that I do not want a Corbyn government. So a few things tipped me over. An argument about a closed CLP Facebook group which had turned into a hatefest before being locked down. We discussed a proposal to reopen the group, which turned into two camps utterly opposed to each other's recollection of why it was a hatefest.Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.
And then yet more AS training. Which confirmed that according to his own published AS materials Corbyn is an anti-semite. And I had this blissful epiphany sitting there in the CLP meeting that I didn't want to be there and didn't care about what they were on about.
I will vote for Paul Williams at the general election as he is a good MP. But am now free to think and have my own opinions and not justify myself to the cult0 -
Hardly difficult.Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.
If that is the major trauma in your life.
You are lucky.0 -
They’d be represented by a larger party on the Commons, though.ydoethur said:
If every Labour member opposed to Corbyn left, surely that would make it less likely he'd be toppled?Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.0 -
Next generation of Brits in F1 looking pretty strong.
Both Norris and Russell are serious prospects for future world championships.0 -
I'm sorry to hear that, but of course I respect your decision.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
It can't have been an easy decision to make, but I hope you feel unburdened now that you have done it.
You'll always be Labour inside. Nobody can take away your values.0 -
Not if all these hundreds of thousands of departing members got together with all the Labour MPs that loathe or despair of Corbyn (70% of them?), and then threatened to make themselves the new Opposition. New Labour.ydoethur said:
If every Labour member opposed to Corbyn left, surely that would make it less likely he'd be toppled?Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.
At that point it wouldn't matter if Corbyn was toppled or not, he would no longer be LOTO0 -
It's not Corbyn, or even Corbyn and his cabal, so much as the readmission of Militant and other assorted trots that Kinnock threw out.Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.0 -
Enjoy your freedom!RochdalePioneers said:
I have been deeply unhappy for a few months now. But finding excuses as to why I should keep going, despite that that I do not want a Corbyn government. So a few things tipped me over. An argument about a closed CLP Facebook group which had turned into a hatefest before being locked down. We discussed a proposal to reopen the group, which turned into two camps utterly opposed to each other's recollection of why it was a hatefest.Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.
And then yet more AS training. Which confirmed that according to his own published AS materials Corbyn is an anti-semite. And I had this blissful epiphany sitting there in the CLP meeting that I didn't want to be there and didn't care about what they were on about.
I will vote for Paul Williams at the general election as he is a good MP. But am now free to think and have my own opinions and not justify myself to the cult0 -
I think it's fair enough not to have a fixed public policy on matters which are future contingents, like would we reapply. The poor old general public are confused enough trying to keep up with Labour contortions and Tory divisions What would not be sensible would be not to have a process of internal discussion now for when/if it arises.El_Capitano said:
Seriously, Nick, there are perhaps people in this world who can accuse the Lib Dems of an ambiguous Brexit policy.NickPalmer said:
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?Byronic said:
But the Lib Dems really will deliver a 2nd referendum, and really will campaign hard for Remain, if they ever get a sniff of power.
For millions of Brits, that is all that matters, all that will matter, for years to come.
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?
But not Corbyn-supporting Labour activists. Take the mote out of thine own eye, etc. etc.
I think it will in fact depend both on terms of withdrawal and how it works out in practice. As these are questions involving a good number of unknowns it' is best left for now.
1 -
You’re blaming him for refusing to divorce someone and for not knowing what a disaster his brother would be. I think that’s pushing it a bit far. It was just bad luck. Also the Henry VIII precedent was not a strong one. The more recent nomination of Lady Jane Grey by Edward VI had not ended well for anyone concerned. Nominating Monmouth WOULD have caused a succession crisis.ydoethur said:
His persistent refusal to divorce his queen and marry somebody who could have children, or use the Henry VIII precedent to nominate Monmouth as his heir could be seen as an unfortunate mistake.DougSeal said:
TBF the major succession crisis wasn’t his fault.ydoethur said:
And shagging everything with a vagina.DougSeal said:
He could do worse than Charles II though. He had a reasonably good record in reconciling a deeply divided Kingdom.ydoethur said:
Albert Frederick Arthur George. Bertie to friends and family, took the regnal name George.OldKingCole said:
His grandfather was Bert, wasn't he?ydoethur said:
Apparently he wants to do what his grandfather did - call himself George VII to avoid any embarrassing parallels.OldKingCole said:
Aren't we looking at King Charles III before too long? Must mean something, although I gather he's given up the mistress habit.Byronic said:
Quite soon after Liam Fox's Book of Martyrs.DougSeal said:
So when do we get our Marian reaction followed by an Elizabethan compromise?Byronic said:
The Reformation is actually a very good analogy for Brexit, in multiple ways.alex. said:So in rapid succession we’ve survived the Blitz and are looking rapidly forward to the Reformation. Where’s it going to end? The Norman Conquest?
I envisage a time, quite soon, when rich, recusant Remainer families will have priest holes behind false walls, where they will hide Jolyon Maugham, or Anna Soubry.
Unless of course, your Jack W when he'll be Charles IV!
Charles is Charles Phillip Arthur George.
And, of course, the last king to prorogue Parliament and rule directly, although people often forget that.
And leaving a major succession crisis that erupted into civil war in two years and revolution followed by war in Ireland in three.
Apart from that, he was a dazzling success.
(Fun fact - if he becomes King, William will be the first descendant of Charles II to be King.)
He must have known James would be an impossible choice as King, for all James' qualities.0 -
RochdalePioneers said:
I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.1 -
Jane was nominated in defiance of the Act, as the next collateral heiress, accepting Henry VIII's assertion that Mary was illegitimate. But nor was Mary, who was nominated, the happiest of precedents. And it is of course fair to point out that Monmouth obviously had little support.DougSeal said:You’re blaming him for refusing to divorce someone and for not knowing what a disaster his brother would be. I think that’s pushing it a bit far. It was just bad luck. Also the Henry VIII precedent was not a strong one. The more recent nomination of Lady Jane Grey by Edward VI had not ended well for anyone concerned. Nominating Monmouth WOULD have caused a succession crisis.
But given this had been making waves long before Charles II died - it was as I recall the reason why he prorogued Parliament - and given James' shortcomings, I still say his stubbornness in not trying to find a resolution of some sort when there were options available was extremely foolish.0 -
Bollocks.-1
-
So assuming Anderson will be unable to bat for long, England will have a lead of jut over 80.
Useful but not match defining.0 -
But it's not terribly impressive having been 150-1.Byronic said:
We'd have seized that eagerly when we were around 300/8.ydoethur said:So assuming Anderson will be unable to bat for long, England will have a lead of jut over 80.
Useful but not match defining.
And they could just nudge the lead near to 90. Mebbes0 -
It's a familiar refrain. My values haven't changed, but the party has. The final line of Clause 4 speaks of "a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect". That is a sad joke when you look at what the party has now become0
-
370 is a very decent first innings Test score at Edgbaston.ydoethur said:
But it's not terribly impressive having been 150-1.Byronic said:
We'd have seized that eagerly when we were around 300/8.ydoethur said:So assuming Anderson will be unable to bat for long, England will have a lead of jut over 80.
Useful but not match defining.
And they could just nudge the lead near to 90. Mebbes
http://www.cricmetric.com/venue.py?venue=Birmingham0 -
When will this bloody cricket ever end? It seems to be on every day.0
-
To Brexit?Byronic said:Bollocks.
0 -
Not raining here yet.
Which means I don't have an excuse for not mowing the lawn.
Laters...0 -
At last Byronic has managed to do a passable impression of the remainer he told us he was?!SandyRentool said:
To Brexit?Byronic said:Bollocks.
0 -
-
C'mon England. 8 more runs.-1
-
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!0 -
I am guessing you’re someone who has never played an active role in frontline politics.Yorkcity said:
Hardly difficult.Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.
If that is the major trauma in your life.
You are lucky.0 -
Why is Woakes not taking a single off the fifth ball of the over?0
-
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!0 -
Good afternoon, everyone.
F1: ha, misjudged the relative pace of all three top teams. Still, I'd much rather lose a bet to misjudgement than some freak accident.
Forgot to add this, but as has become usual the pre-race tosh will be up tomorrow morning.0 -
Jimmy certianly won't be doing any bowling.0
-
Neither Johnson nor Farage are thick. Farage is arguably a political genius, and the most influential politician of our time. Though obviously hated by many.ydoethur said:
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!0 -
I loathe this habit of not taking runs. Anderson going to be facing the next over anyway, so TAKING THE FRICKIN RUNS.0
-
Depends a bit on what you mean by thick.Byronic said:
Neither Johnson nor Farage are thick. Farage is arguably a political genius, and the most influential politician of our time. Though obviously hated by many.ydoethur said:
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!
If you mean, able to translate several languages, I'll admit they're brighter than me.
If you mean, able to grasp simple problems and propose reasonable solutions, then clearly they are very thick.
Unfortunately politics requires people who can do the latter (and indeed, understand complex problems which they certainly can't).0 -
Good for you. I left soon after Corbyn became leader and I have been arguing about it with a friend who has been a member for 40 years ever since. He claimed you had to stay and fight - had a text from him about a week ago saying he had resigned and joined the Lib Dems!! Sometimes you have to admit the game is over.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
1 -
The odds against an Australian victory have just come in quite dramatically, as Anderson's pain became obvious in the last few minutes. They were around 5/1, now nearer 3/1FrancisUrquhart said:Jimmy certianly won't be doing any bowling.
0 -
I think Farage is (or was) the right man, in the right place, rather than a political (or actual) genius.Byronic said:
Neither Johnson nor Farage are thick. Farage is arguably a political genius, and the most influential politician of our time. Though obviously hated by many.ydoethur said:
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!
0 -
I think that's pretty generous. Chasing more than 175 in the last innings is going to be tough.Byronic said:
The odds against an Australian victory have just come in quite dramatically, as Anderson's pain became obvious in the last few minutes. They were around 5/1, now nearer 3/1FrancisUrquhart said:Jimmy certianly won't be doing any bowling.
0 -
Cricviz has convicts with only 14% chance.Byronic said:
The odds against an Australian victory have just come in quite dramatically, as Anderson's pain became obvious in the last few minutes. They were around 5/1, now nearer 3/1FrancisUrquhart said:Jimmy certianly won't be doing any bowling.
I have long had a poor view of their model.0 -
Cricviz misses the fact that we only have three bowlers.FrancisUrquhart said:
Cricviz has convicts with only 14% chance.Byronic said:
The odds against an Australian victory have just come in quite dramatically, as Anderson's pain became obvious in the last few minutes. They were around 5/1, now nearer 3/1FrancisUrquhart said:Jimmy certianly won't be doing any bowling.
0 -
Set aside Johnson for now, Farage has almost single-handedly steered the nation to an epochal referendum, was influential in winning that referendum, and is now bullying the Tories towards a hard or no-deal Brexit.ydoethur said:
Depends a bit on what you mean by thick.Byronic said:
Neither Johnson nor Farage are thick. Farage is arguably a political genius, and the most influential politician of our time. Though obviously hated by many.ydoethur said:
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since f my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!
If you mean, able to translate several languages, I'll admit they're brighter than me.
If you mean, able to grasp simple problems and propose reasonable solutions, then clearly they are very thick.
Unfortunately politics requires people who can do the latter (and indeed, understand complex problems which they certainly can't).
No one else has had such influence on our politics in a generation. Of course, many see that influence as malign, but that's not the argument.0 -
England lead by 90.
But can they have the Aussies five down before parity?
I have to say I doubt it.-1 -
Agreed. Had the EU expansion of 2004 not happened, then Euroscepticism would have remained a fringe interest.rcs1000 said:
I think Farage is (or was) the right man, in the right place, rather than a political (or actual) genius.Byronic said:
Neither Johnson nor Farage are thick. Farage is arguably a political genius, and the most influential politician of our time. Though obviously hated by many.ydoethur said:
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!0 -
Parties can change for the better and worse, politics is cyclical both generally and within an individual party. Sometimes you have to sit things out either inside or outside depending on your level of revulsion at the direction a party takes. In my experience the first break is always the hardest! I am currently a floating voter but have backed LD as a protest, I encourage you to find a vehicle to do the same at forthcoming elections. It does not obviously mean you have to be a member or participate but the buggers only take notice when you vote for someone else!RochdalePioneers said:It's a familiar refrain. My values haven't changed, but the party has. The final line of Clause 4 speaks of "a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect". That is a sad joke when you look at what the party has now become
0 -
I have no idea how they are going to get Steve Smith out.ydoethur said:England lead by 90.
But can they have the Aussies five down before parity?
I have to say I doubt it.0 -
Must have been difficult decision. So hard to know whether to stay and fight and all that. But at end of the day if the Party has values that you can no longer defend or stomach, it is time to go.RochdalePioneers said:It's a familiar refrain. My values haven't changed, but the party has. The final line of Clause 4 speaks of "a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect". That is a sad joke when you look at what the party has now become
0 -
It looks generous to me too. You can get 15/4 right now.rcs1000 said:
I think that's pretty generous. Chasing more than 175 in the last innings is going to be tough.Byronic said:
The odds against an Australian victory have just come in quite dramatically, as Anderson's pain became obvious in the last few minutes. They were around 5/1, now nearer 3/1FrancisUrquhart said:Jimmy certianly won't be doing any bowling.
0 -
No. Farage is much more than that.rcs1000 said:
I think Farage is (or was) the right man, in the right place, rather than a political (or actual) genius.Byronic said:
Neither Johnson nor Farage are thick. Farage is arguably a political genius, and the most influential politician of our time. Though obviously hated by many.ydoethur said:
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As some
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!
Look at the way he quit UKIP, at just the right time, then set up the Brexit Party from scratch, and guided them to victory in the European elex, about six weeks later? And now the BXP are scarily salient in the GE polls (if you're a Tory).
This takes great political intelligence, on several levels. Farage is the smartest operator out there (now that Salmond is out).
0 -
I quite enjoyed Leicester's season in League One, just a few years ago. We have great owners.dixiedean said:
Dropping out is fine, as long as you get back before the parachute money ends, as Newcastle and West Ham have proved more than once. It is if you don't, and, even worse, fall into the third a la Leeds. Now Bolton. Nowt will get done.beentheredonethat said:
Man Utd dropped out in the 70’s. Not inconceivable it could happen again. Then something may get donedixiedean said:
That was at the root of Bolton's problems. Massive debt, easily serviceable whilst in the PL...beentheredonethat said:
As long as they are creaming off the top they will be but that club is in so much debt it is untrueOldKingCole said:
At least the team's wages have been paid!beentheredonethat said:Having said that, the glazers are a nightmare so the premier league are no better
Far worse was administration in 2002. We nearly ceased to be.
Good times are back, and a good transfer season for us. A strong performance in the pre season friendly last night against Atalanta.0 -
I was fighting. Celebrated getting a local loon booted. But realised that every single day I was fighting with myself to look past my hatred of the party and what it was forcing me to be. Until last night, when I suddenly realised my "let's fight and win" hand was a pair of 4s.OllyT said:
Good for you. I left soon after Corbyn became leader and I have been arguing about it with a friend who has been a member for 40 years ever since. He claimed you had to stay and fight - had a text from him about a week ago saying he had resigned and joined the Lib Dems!! Sometimes you have to admit the game is over.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
So I folded. Placed my cards on the table and stepped away. I don't regret at least trying to fight. But I also don't regret quitting. It's liberating.0 -
Missed the last wicket as at the bar (not a legal term)ydoethur said:England lead by 90.
But can they have the Aussies five down before parity?
I have to say I doubt it.
What happened?
0 -
Mr. Borough, the Nader Party does indeed look up and running.
Edited extra bit: anyone got any view on Age of Wonders: Planetfall?
Being a console peasant I haven't played any of the other titles on PC, but it looks pretty good.
The slavers human resource specialists The Syndicate look interesting.0 -
49?rottenborough said:
Has Farage chosen a seat yet, or is he chicken?0 -
Anderson scooped up the spinner, for an easy catchbeentheredonethat said:
Missed the last wicket as at the bar (not a legal term)ydoethur said:England lead by 90.
But can they have the Aussies five down before parity?
I have to say I doubt it.
What happened?0 -
If I have time one of the things I want to do is gather the statistics for a reliability diagram for the cricviz predictions.FrancisUrquhart said:
Cricviz has convicts with only 14% chance.Byronic said:
The odds against an Australian victory have just come in quite dramatically, as Anderson's pain became obvious in the last few minutes. They were around 5/1, now nearer 3/1FrancisUrquhart said:Jimmy certianly won't be doing any bowling.
I have long had a poor view of their model.0 -
When is he going to announce the first party member?rottenborough said:0 -
Anderson had a swipe. It was clear he couldn't run anymore.beentheredonethat said:
Missed the last wicket as at the bar (not a legal term)ydoethur said:England lead by 90.
But can they have the Aussies five down before parity?
I have to say I doubt it.
What happened?0 -
He is currently leader of the largest single party in the European Parliament, unless it was Clacton (UKIP's only seat in 2015) I doubt he would botherOblitusSumMe said:0 -
I can empathise with your decision, having decided at the beginning of 1997 not to renew my membership because of Blair's acquiescence with Thatcherism - ironically at the very moment the voters wanted real change rather than something cosmetic.The mood of the country had shifted by that time , and Labour would have won comfortably enough on a repeat of its 1992 manifesto. I did not vote Labour again at a Parliamentary election until 2015 - and the Gender Vetting selection process will prevent me doing so next time despite living in a key marginal.RochdalePioneers said:
I have been deeply unhappy for a few months now. But finding excuses as to why I should keep going, despite that that I do not want a Corbyn government. So a few things tipped me over. An argument about a closed CLP Facebook group which had turned into a hatefest before being locked down. We discussed a proposal to reopen the group, which turned into two camps utterly opposed to each other's recollection of why it was a hatefest.Byronic said:
You should applaud his honour and bravery in making that difficult decision.TheScreamingEagles said:
I'm not sure whether to applaud you or feel sorry for you.RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
All I know it must have been a difficult decision.
If every other Labour member had Rochdale's principles, they would do the same: then Corbyn and his horrible cabal would be toppled and replaced - and this country would once again have a decent, fighting Opposition, which we so desperately need.
Well done, Mr Pioneers.
And then yet more AS training. Which confirmed that according to his own published AS materials Corbyn is an anti-semite. And I had this blissful epiphany sitting there in the CLP meeting that I didn't want to be there and didn't care about what they were on about.
I will vote for Paul Williams at the general election as he is a good MP. But am now free to think and have my own opinions and not justify myself to the cult
The act of leaving was emotionally very traumatic, and I came to seriously regret the 27 years of activism which had preceded it. I have never felt an inclination to rejoin - beyond registering as a 'supporter' for the 2015 Leadership election when I voted for Yvette Cooper.0 -
-
Get the other 10.FrancisUrquhart said:
I have no idea how they are going to get Steve Smith out.ydoethur said:England lead by 90.
But can they have the Aussies five down before parity?
I have to say I doubt it.0 -
In the immortal words of Chesney Hawkes "I am the one and only."Theuniondivvie said:
When is he going to announce the first party member?rottenborough said:0 -
Some truth in that. The 3 most influential post war UK politicians have been Attlee, Thatcher and Farage on some measures (Churchill the most influential war leader of course but less so in peacetime)Byronic said:
Neither Johnson nor Farage are thick. Farage is arguably a political genius, and the most influential politician of our time. Though obviously hated by many.ydoethur said:
It's very nice to be able to say Johnson, Corbyn and Farage are all thick, useless and incompetent.The_Taxman said:
+1IanB2 said:RochdalePioneers said:I have resigned from the Labour Party
As someone who spent a year outside of the LibDems last year, for the first time since my schooldays, I have sympathy with your position. There’s no need to do anything more in haste; for a long term party member there’s a freedom that comes from suddenly being a customer with choice rather than a fan with obligations, which you will probably enjoy. Voting in any election when you don’t just look for the party logo, but can weigh up the candidate profiles and their manifestos, is liberating. Make the most of it!
In my case I considered the local Green Party and I considered TIG when it launched, and signed up as one of their early supporters. In the event I decided the Greens weren’t for me (although I would happily back them in an alliance, which may well arrive round my way) and TIG crashed and burned. I am now back within the LibDems and very happy with the outcome of my year of intellectual independence.
Whether you return to Labour or find a new more fulfilling political home, time will tell. Meanwhile enjoy the chance to do some free thinking.
Sound advice! You can still be interested in politics but not actually be a member. Not having to turn a blind eye to stupid ideas, policies or party problems gives an independent minded person moral superiority!0 -
Having been a member of my party (in an earlier form) for nearly 40 years, I realise how deeply painful and difficult it must have been for you to sever your ties but you are entirely correct.RochdalePioneers said:It's a familiar refrain. My values haven't changed, but the party has. The final line of Clause 4 speaks of "a spirit of solidarity, tolerance and respect". That is a sad joke when you look at what the party has now become
For all the snide comments directed from some on here, the Labour Party has made a great contribution to this country for which it deserves great credit. I'm too young to have been aware of the Wilson Government from 1964 to 1970 but that seems to me to have been a modern forward thinking administration and socially liberal too.
As a Liberal, I welcomed a few Labour defectors to the SDP when the Alliance came along. They were, without exception, caring individuals with whom it was an honour to work and pound the streets. I produced my first leaflets with the help of an ex-Labour member who knew his way round a lithograph having worked in the print industry.
I earnestly hope the Labour Party comes back to you so you can go back to it and I think it will happen.
0 -
No, the policy's clear, just not one that most people like in our polarised society - oppose No Deal Brexit, oppose the May WA, if elected try to negotiate a better one, then ask the people if they prefer that or would rather just Remain. I think it makes sense.El_Capitano said:
Seriously, Nick, there are perhaps people in this world who can accuse the Lib Dems of an ambiguous Brexit policy.NickPalmer said:
Yes, but there you immediately run into another LibDem ambiguity. What if we have in fact withdrawn on October 31. Is LibDem policy to reapply?
I have no clue. Do you? Have they even discussed it?
But not Corbyn-supporting Labour activists. Take the mote out of thine own eye, etc. etc.
If we've already left, then we have the same problem as you do, though - do we try to negotiate readmission and then offer a referendum, or move on?
Rochdale: sorry to lose you (I put the argument against on the last thread, but thought I shouldn't pursue it). I think you're making a mistake, but clearly when membership was making you so unhappy it was the right thing for you to do now. I hope you'll rejoin in a while.0 -
Really don't understand these cricket odds.
England are favourites to win, but not by much, with Anderson obviously crocked.
Yet Australia are 4/1 against?
https://www.oddschecker.com/cricket0 -
When England were bowled out for 85 before lunch at Lords by Ireland, England were still strong favourites to win the match according to the betting odds. I thought that was very strange at the time, although it proved to be correct in the end.Byronic said:Really don't understand these cricket odds.
England are favourites to win, but not by much, with Anderson obviously crocked.
Yet Australia are 4/1 against?
https://www.oddschecker.com/cricket0