politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Sales tacks. What to do with the high street holes caused by s

TheScreamingEagles said:

The editor of Waitrose Food magazine, William Sitwell, is standing down with immediate effect after suggesting a series on "killing vegans, one by one".

He was responding to an email pitch from freelance journalist Selene Nelson who had suggested features on plant-based recipes.

Sitwell, also a critic on Masterchef, apologised for any offence caused.

Waitrose said: "William's email absolutely doesn't represent our views about vegans and vegan food."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46042314

A reminder of the key indicator as to how many f*cks a public figure gives when apologising.

"any offence caused" = zero

"the offence I've undoubtedly caused" = possibly one or more (or was at least careful enough to hire a decent PR).

interesting thread:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeTrefgarne/status/1057365154625675269

ydoethur said:

HYUFD said:

ydoethur said:

HYUFD said:

Hammond's move to cut business rates for high street shops and raise taxes on online retailers revenues should help the high street a bit.

If gaps do emerge still then converting former retail premises to offices or affordable accommodation seems srnsible

One word - parking. Outside maybe ten major cities where public transport is both very good and preferable, that is a big, big problem in city centres and converting them to offices or houses would only make it worse.

In Epping they are looking at underground car parks and the more flats and housing created in towns and cities means the less needed in the greenbelt and countryside

Or the first floor as a car park, as in Cannock town centre? It could work, the question is, will it be allowed to?

If the council is behind it as it is here then yes

rottenborough said:

interesting thread:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeTrefgarne/status/1057365154625675269

Good job Phil saved some cash in the good times.

TheScreamingEagles said:

The editor of Waitrose Food magazine, William Sitwell, is standing down with immediate effect after suggesting a series on "killing vegans, one by one".

He was responding to an email pitch from freelance journalist Selene Nelson who had suggested features on plant-based recipes.

Sitwell, also a critic on Masterchef, apologised for any offence caused.

Waitrose said: "William's email absolutely doesn't represent our views about vegans and vegan food."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46042314

I can’t deny I share some of his frustrations about vegans.

Terminating his employment is an overreaction. I really detest the lunch mob.

Conspiracy klaxon! Mention of Tapestry earlier reminds me that some tin foil wearers have made the link between Bob Mueller of Trumpton and Whitey Bulger, murdered just one day after being moved across country for no apparent reason.

Pulpstar said:

rottenborough said:

interesting thread:

https://twitter.com/GeorgeTrefgarne/status/1057365154625675269

Good job Phil saved some cash in the good times.

Those roof don't fix themselves you know...

Re the cities quiz: Sutton Coldfield is officially part of Birmingham and so shouldn't be listed separately. I think the figure for the population of Birmingham already includes the population of Sutton Coldfield.

Nigelb said:

HYUFD said:

Hammond's move to cut business rates for high street shops and raise taxes on online retailers revenues should help the high street a bit.

If gaps do emerge still then converting former retail premises to offices or affordable accommodation seems srnsible

It does nothing for the 10% of business ratepayers who account for 70% of business rates - so the anchor tenants will continue becoming unanchored.

It will help more community high street shops though, the rest can become offices or affordable accommodation if vacated

FeersumEnjineeya said:

Re the cities quiz: Sutton Coldfield is officially part of Birmingham and so shouldn't be listed separately. I think the figure for the population of Birmingham already includes the population of Sutton Coldfield.

Try telling my aunt that.

Fenster said:

Casino_Royale said:

Fenster said:

Casino_Royale said:

Very depressing.

My own town centre has been substantially hollowed out over the last two to three years, and is now dominated by coffee shops, tattoo parlours, barber shops, betting shops and charity shops (which, remarkably, seem to be what people want).

It's a strange situation because my village in the Welsh valleys seems to be undergoing a revival. We've had two boutique shops open in the past few years, a local grocery has opened (bucking the threat of the large Tescos half a mile away) and we even have a Kurdish barbers.

It goes to show that it's very much a local thing. Maybe we are just lucky.

Are you on a tourist trail, or near a national park hotspot?

No, I'm in a pit village (Ystrad Mynach). We are in a nice spot because we are at the bottom of the valley and only 14 miles by train directly to the centre of Cardiff. I think it's beautiful here; friendly, pretty, communal, sporty, great junior schools, low unemployment and very safe. But whenever I see stats the Caerphilly borough is deemed one of the UK's shitholes. I travel all around the UK and I wouldn't swap the valleys for anywhere. It's not wealthy or sophisticated here but I like it.

Good for you.

I feel exactly the same about my hometown.

I was talking to a neighbour over the weekend, who told me that he'd just had a great short-break holiday in Birmingham. Yes, I was surprised too.

Casino_Royale said:

TheScreamingEagles said:

The editor of Waitrose Food magazine, William Sitwell, is standing down with immediate effect after suggesting a series on "killing vegans, one by one".

He was responding to an email pitch from freelance journalist Selene Nelson who had suggested features on plant-based recipes.

Sitwell, also a critic on Masterchef, apologised for any offence caused.

Waitrose said: "William's email absolutely doesn't represent our views about vegans and vegan food."

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-46042314

I can’t deny I share some of his frustrations about vegans.

Terminating his employment is an overreaction. I really detest the lunch mob.

I think it's fair to say though that he stuffed himself. He must have been nuts to say such a thing. People were going to protest lentil he cows complained about not being milked.

Casino_Royale said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

TOPPING said:

It's not that Peter Bone is an utter, utter twat and in the same party as I support that is the problem.

It is that he and his fellow idiots are close to being if not are already in a position of influence.

He is a million miles away from my views and I am confident the ultras like him will not win the day

I don’t agree with him on some issues, but he’s certainty not a million miles away from my views. He’s still a Conservative.

Corbyn and McDonnell, however, are and I’d wade through blood to stop them.

But isn't it becoming increasingly clear that the price of Brexit, especially a hard Brexit, is going to be a period of Corbyn-McDonnell government? And the one thing they've shown is that once they get their hands on the levers of institutional power, they are masters at manipulating them to set their own position in stone.

The next election - and the decades that follow it - could easily, easily, become 1979 in reverse.

blueblue said:

Casino_Royale said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

TOPPING said:

It's not that Peter Bone is an utter, utter twat and in the same party as I support that is the problem.

It is that he and his fellow idiots are close to being if not are already in a position of influence.

He is a million miles away from my views and I am confident the ultras like him will not win the day

I don’t agree with him on some issues, but he’s certainty not a million miles away from my views. He’s still a Conservative.

Corbyn and McDonnell, however, are and I’d wade through blood to stop them.

But isn't it becoming increasingly clear that the price of Brexit, especially a hard Brexit, is going to be a period of Corbyn-McDonnell government? And the one thing they've shown is that once they get their hands on the levers of institutional power, they are masters at manipulating them to set their own position in stone.

The next election - and the decades that follow it - could easily, easily, become 1979 in reverse.

I’m not so sure about that actually.

I certainly feel better than I did a year ago. The longer those two are in charge the more likely they are to be found out.

Casino_Royale said:

blueblue said:

Casino_Royale said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

TOPPING said:

It's not that Peter Bone is an utter, utter twat and in the same party as I support that is the problem.

It is that he and his fellow idiots are close to being if not are already in a position of influence.

He is a million miles away from my views and I am confident the ultras like him will not win the day

I don’t agree with him on some issues, but he’s certainty not a million miles away from my views. He’s still a Conservative.

Corbyn and McDonnell, however, are and I’d wade through blood to stop them.

But isn't it becoming increasingly clear that the price of Brexit, especially a hard Brexit, is going to be a period of Corbyn-McDonnell government? And the one thing they've shown is that once they get their hands on the levers of institutional power, they are masters at manipulating them to set their own position in stone.

The next election - and the decades that follow it - could easily, easily, become 1979 in reverse.

I’m not so sure about that actually.

I certainly feel better than I did a year ago. The longer those two are in charge the more likely they are to be found out.

howso? By McDonnell saying he would leave in place tax cuts for the aspiring wealthy? By him saying he would vote for a Brexit which protects jobs and the economy?

All very sensible sounding IMO. No one's going to be found out if that continues.

blueblue said:

Casino_Royale said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

TOPPING said:

It's not that Peter Bone is an utter, utter twat and in the same party as I support that is the problem.

It is that he and his fellow idiots are close to being if not are already in a position of influence.

He is a million miles away from my views and I am confident the ultras like him will not win the day

I don’t agree with him on some issues, but he’s certainty not a million miles away from my views. He’s still a Conservative.

Corbyn and McDonnell, however, are and I’d wade through blood to stop them.

But isn't it becoming increasingly clear that the price of Brexit, especially a hard Brexit, is going to be a period of Corbyn-McDonnell government? And the one thing they've shown is that once they get their hands on the levers of institutional power, they are masters at manipulating them to set their own position in stone.

The next election - and the decades that follow it - could easily, easily, become 1979 in reverse.

Left wing Labour would be following the economic irrationality and geopolitical isolationism of Brexit to its logical conclusion.

https://twitter.com/paulwaugh/status/1057629585443966977

Restructuring?

What does that mean?

The DWP could not cope with another restructure as they will be still knee-deep in UC mess.

TOPPING said:

Casino_Royale said:

blueblue said:

Casino_Royale said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

TOPPING said:

It's not that Peter Bone is an utter, utter twat and in the same party as I support that is the problem.

It is that he and his fellow idiots are close to being if not are already in a position of influence.

He is a million miles away from my views and I am confident the ultras like him will not win the day

I don’t agree with him on some issues, but he’s certainty not a million miles away from my views. He’s still a Conservative.

Corbyn and McDonnell, however, are and I’d wade through blood to stop them.

But isn't it becoming increasingly clear that the price of Brexit, especially a hard Brexit, is going to be a period of Corbyn-McDonnell government? And the one thing they've shown is that once they get their hands on the levers of institutional power, they are masters at manipulating them to set their own position in stone.

The next election - and the decades that follow it - could easily, easily, become 1979 in reverse.

I’m not so sure about that actually.

I certainly feel better than I did a year ago. The longer those two are in charge the more likely they are to be found out.

howso? By McDonnell saying he would leave in place tax cuts for the aspiring wealthy? By him saying he would vote for a Brexit which protects jobs and the economy?

All very sensible sounding IMO. No one's going to be found out if that continues.

Their names and brand are starting to be shop soiled amongst the public at large, and that is cutting through and starting to show up in the polls.

It may be GE2017 represented near perfect conditions for them. But I’m not complacent.

ydoethur said:

HYUFD said:

Hammond's move to cut business rates for high street shops and raise taxes on online retailers revenues should help the high street a bit.

If gaps do emerge still then converting former retail premises to offices or affordable accommodation seems srnsible

One word - parking. Outside maybe ten major cities where public transport is both very good and preferable, that is a big, big problem in city centres and converting them to offices or houses would only make it worse.

Driverless cars, and a large automatic car park on the edge of town, from where you can summon your car to drive itself back and pick you up from the high street, once your shopping is done.

Richard_Nabavi said:

TheScreamingEagles said:

Richard_Nabavi said:

I was talking to a neighbour over the weekend, who told me that he'd just had a great short-break holiday in Birmingham. Yes, I was surprised too.

This neighbour, did he grow up in Somalia, Afghanistan, or Glagow?

Because that might explain why he liked Birmingham.

He was particularly enthusiastic about this place:

http://www.birminghammuseums.org.uk/jewellery/about

Birmingham, particularly the Jewellery Quarter (JQ), is great.

As the name suggests, I moved here from Paris, to much mockery from my peers. Its not a brilliant city, sure, but its far better than its reputation.

Plus points

*good cheap food - almost every decent pub now does a decent menu, whether its classic pub food (see Red Lion and Lord Clifden, JQ), soul food, pizza, or they're one of the many Desi Pubs (Hen and Chickens, just outside the city centre). Good selection of independents - and a local scheme to support and advertise the range available.

*decent mainstream shopping areas in the Bullring and around there

*some nice buildings and a good civic museum

*half decent countryside within train/driving distance.

*JQ is a lovely place, a mix of well-designed new builds fitting into 3 story workshops. Still has the jewellery industry, lots of restaurants and bars.

Minus points

*Half the city centre is a dive

*Rubbish transport - its all spokes, no rims.

*it feels like its music scene is limited, but I know its got big venues. The black country does go for covers acts, and 70s bands still trooping on. I'm going to see The Sweet in December, ffs.

*(I think its missing a centrally based half-decent non-league football team, but that's about it).

JosiasJessop said:

Apple introduces their new watch OS, which displays just an Apple logo.

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-46045414

TSE declares he is ecstatic at the upgrade.

A minor flaw.

Probably a false flag attack on Apple.

British bank Barclays will ask the UK’s high court in the coming months to allow it transfer business worth about €250 billion to the Republic as the lender steps up its Brexit preparations.

Barclays has already confirmed that it intends to move its non-UK European business to the Republic from Britain ahead of the country’s planned departure from the EU in March 2019.

The bank has applied to the UK high court for an order allowing it to transfer its European Economic Area (EEA) business to the Republic and expects this to be heard on January 22nd.

The hearing will cover corporate banking, investment banking, private clients and customers’ overseas business based in the EEA. Anyone who believes the plan will damage their interests can make their case at the January hearing.

According to reports last week, the move will involve the transfer of €250 billion in group assets to the Republic. The EEA comprises the EU, Iceland, Liechtenstein and Norway.

https://www.irishtimes.com/business/financial-services/barclays-seeking-to-move-250bn-business-to-republic-ahead-of-brexit-1.3680943

https://twitter.com/nicktimiraos/status/1057632697814704130?s=21

IanB2 said:

Richard_Nabavi said:

https://twitter.com/RobinBrittonTV/status/1057594991340593152

I reckon that is the last word on his political ambitions.

Donald Trump seemed to survive his effigy being used by Edenbridge....

Labour all over the place post-budget.

Maybe an early GE is not quite in their interests as they all seem to think...

rottenborough said:

Labour all over the place post-budget.

Maybe an early GE is not quite in their interests as they all seem to think...

Yeah what a shame but it is hard to see how it would make any difference.

AramintaMoonbeamQC said:

ydoethur said:

TheScreamingEagles said:

Peter Bone says Phil Hammond is the Prince of Brexit.

I told you all to back Hammond as next PM, history is on his side.

http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2018/08/05/history-suggests-one-of-philip-hammond-jeremy-hunt-and-sajid-javid-will-be-theresa-mays-successor-if-she-goes-before-the-next-election/

I always knew Cameron wasn't completely stupid:

Overnight it emerged David Cameron regards Michael Gove as a lunatic and that might hinder Gove’s chances.

Although it does beg the question of why he left him at Education for so many years...

Because he couldn't give a toss about state schools, so let Gove introduce multiple chaotic reforms to structures, funding, qualifications and initial teacher training.

He only punted him when focus groups showed him that Gove's tenure in this role was hugely unpopular. The DfE are still trying to clear up the mess.

What is odd is that in Opposition under Cameron, all the spin was how extensively the Tories were preparing for government, yet Lansley, Gove and IDS all unleashed ill-conceived revolutions that seemed to take colleagues by surprise. Did the Shadow Cabinet not talk to each other?

BannedInParis said:

Richard_Nabavi said:

TheScreamingEagles said:

Richard_Nabavi said:

I was talking to a neighbour over the weekend, who told me that he'd just had a great short-break holiday in Birmingham. Yes, I was surprised too.

This neighbour, did he grow up in Somalia, Afghanistan, or Glagow?

Because that might explain why he liked Birmingham.

He was particularly enthusiastic about this place:

http://www.birminghammuseums.org.uk/jewellery/about

Birmingham, particularly the Jewellery Quarter (JQ), is great.

As the name suggests, I moved here from Paris, to much mockery from my peers. Its not a brilliant city, sure, but its far better than its reputation.

Plus points

*good cheap food - almost every decent pub now does a decent menu, whether its classic pub food (see Red Lion and Lord Clifden, JQ), soul food, pizza, or they're one of the many Desi Pubs (Hen and Chickens, just outside the city centre). Good selection of independents - and a local scheme to support and advertise the range available.

*decent mainstream shopping areas in the Bullring and around there

*some nice buildings and a good civic museum

*half decent countryside within train/driving distance.

*JQ is a lovely place, a mix of well-designed new builds fitting into 3 story workshops. Still has the jewellery industry, lots of restaurants and bars.

Minus points

*Half the city centre is a dive

*Rubbish transport - its all spokes, no rims.

*it feels like its music scene is limited, but I know its got big venues. The black country does go for covers acts, and 70s bands still trooping on. I'm going to see The Sweet in December, ffs.

*(I think its missing a centrally based half-decent non-league football team, but that's about it).

If you enjoy classical music, the acoustic in Symphony Hall is excellent.
Test match ground.
Not a bad university, too...

JosiasJessop said:

IanB2 said:

ydoethur said:

HYUFD said:

Hammond's move to cut business rates for high street shops and raise taxes on online retailers revenues should help the high street a bit.

If gaps do emerge still then converting former retail premises to offices or affordable accommodation seems srnsible

One word - parking. Outside maybe ten major cities where public transport is both very good and preferable, that is a big, big problem in city centres and converting them to offices or houses would only make it worse.

Driverless cars, and a large automatic car park on the edge of town, from where you can summon your car to drive itself back and pick you up from the high street, once your shopping is done.

That rather assumes driverless cars are going to be reliable enough, and acceptable enough, for such use.

They are.
A forward thinking government would legislate to allow an urban authority, with local consent, to do a deal with someone like Waymo* to plan for and implement a fully driverless town...

(* I see the California state government has just approved their conducting fully driverless testing in state, without a supervisory driver.)

On US turnout, there never seems to be any official, absolute figures. It's always news media/3rd parties talking about comparitive increases in the racial mix and so forth. In addition many states (California I'm looking at you) are unbelievably slow at counting votes.

Most frustrating compared to here where we do at least always get "official" numbers on the night.

MarqueeMark said:

IanB2 said:

Richard_Nabavi said:

https://twitter.com/RobinBrittonTV/status/1057594991340593152

I reckon that is the last word on his political ambitions.

Donald Trump seemed to survive his effigy being used by Edenbridge....

He wasn't being burned by his own electorate.

Blimey ...
https://twitter.com/tbonier/status/1057625166920990722?s=21

Richard_Nabavi said:

DecrepitJohnL said:

AramintaMoonbeamQC said:

ydoethur said:

TheScreamingEagles said:

Peter Bone says Phil Hammond is the Prince of Brexit.

I told you all to back Hammond as next PM, history is on his side.

http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2018/08/05/history-suggests-one-of-philip-hammond-jeremy-hunt-and-sajid-javid-will-be-theresa-mays-successor-if-she-goes-before-the-next-election/

I always knew Cameron wasn't completely stupid:

Overnight it emerged David Cameron regards Michael Gove as a lunatic and that might hinder Gove’s chances.

Although it does beg the question of why he left him at Education for so many years...

Because he couldn't give a toss about state schools, so let Gove introduce multiple chaotic reforms to structures, funding, qualifications and initial teacher training.

He only punted him when focus groups showed him that Gove's tenure in this role was hugely unpopular. The DfE are still trying to clear up the mess.

What is odd is that in Opposition under Cameron, all the spin was how extensively the Tories were preparing for government, yet Lansley, Gove and IDS all unleashed ill-conceived revolutions that seemed to take colleagues by surprise. Did the Shadow Cabinet not talk to each other?

They were extremely well-prepared, the three you mention particularly so (and of course Osborne for taking over the Treasury). Unfortunately the NHS reforms, having originally been supported with some enthusiasm by the LibDems, were screwed up when the latter got cold feet (or wanted revenge for losing the AV referendum) later. Still, the other two are going strong, and are very good achievements, of which both coalition parties should be proud. Universal Credit in particular is a massive achievement: no other government in recent years has done so well in correcting the utter mess that the benefits system had got into, and it's a jolly difficult beast to reform.

Can you give any example of how the Lib Dems screwed up the health reforms? That seems quite a partisan re-writing of history from here.

RobD said:

SouthamObserver said:

Blimey ...
https://twitter.com/tbonier/status/1057625166920990722?s=21

How many of those were able to vote at elections previously?

Every time we have this. Once in a blue moon does an unexpected tide roll in

tpfkar said:

Can you give any example of how the Lib Dems screwed up the health reforms? That seems quite a partisan re-writing of history from here.

Most notably by insisting that one of the most vital advantages, competition on price by service providers, was removed (they'd previously supported it). That of course made a nonsense of the whole point of improving efficiency through price discovery and incentivising efficient operation. They also insisted on a whole raft of extra layers of bureaucracy, making it much more cumbersome and expensive than Lansley had originally proposed.

SouthamObserver said:

Blimey ...
https://twitter.com/tbonier/status/1057625166920990722?s=21

Texas starts from a miserably low base for election turnout. I made it the second lowest state for turnout at POTUS16, with Hawaii being the lowest.

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1dEwTzRca1tHFuClBeqW9yEJdPuButr0Ra6_F0CNMg_s/edit#gid=0

Casino_Royale said:

Big_G_NorthWales said:

TOPPING said:

It's not that Peter Bone is an utter, utter twat and in the same party as I support that is the problem.

It is that he and his fellow idiots are close to being if not are already in a position of influence.

He is a million miles away from my views and I am confident the ultras like him will not win the day

I don’t agree with him on some issues, but he’s certainty not a million miles away from my views. He’s still a Conservative.

Corbyn and McDonnell, however, are and I’d wade through blood to stop them.

All of us have a problem with admitting that we don't think it would really be good if our parties won every election forever. But it wouldn't - sooner or later, all parties need to recharge their batteries in Opposition, and a new team needs a shot at trying out some different approaches. Conservatives need to accept that at some point there will be a left-wing government, just as we need to accept that that won't last indefinitely either.

IMO the Conservatives are currently in the same state as Labour were in 2010 - utterly worn down, and totally reliant on voters thinking the other side are dangerous. Winning another election in that state can be a poisoned chalice - arguably the Conservatives would have been better off losing in 1992 than in 1997.

Richard_Nabavi said:

tpfkar said:

Can you give any example of how the Lib Dems screwed up the health reforms? That seems quite a partisan re-writing of history from here.

Most notably by insisting that one of the most vital advantages, competition on price by service providers, was removed (they'd previously supported it). That of course made a nonsense of the whole point of improving efficiency through price discovery and incentivising efficient operation. They also insisted on a whole raft of extra layers of bureaucracy, making it much more cumbersome and expensive than Lansley had originally proposed.

Well, we’ve seen how competition by price has worked in other areas of public service. Ruskin’s adage is still true.

on topic. Isn't it just the case that old stores, brands, retail models (eg department stores) are no longer viable, and new ones take their place? Old shops close down, new ones open. Certainly, there seems to be a growth in specialist retail outlet that cater for niches that are poorly served online. Isn't this just best understood as change?

How are towns become Dormitories for the poor? I travel around the place quite a lot. To my mind, the part of the country that is becoming a dormitory for the poor are the outskirts of London. Poor, run down housing, cramped conditions, uncared for public spaces, etc. Other parts that are less economically well off, including coastal towns, are in reality nicer places to live.

rpjs said:

TheScreamingEagles said:

AlastairMeeks said:

FeersumEnjineeya said:

Re the cities quiz: Sutton Coldfield is officially part of Birmingham and so shouldn't be listed separately. I think the figure for the population of Birmingham already includes the population of Sutton Coldfield.

Try telling my aunt that.

Does she leave off the postcode when she gives her address ?

Solihull is in the B postcode area but is clearly not Birminghum.

Solihull is listed separately from Birmingham in the 100 biggest cities Quiz introduced by Alastair.

Richard_Nabavi said:

JosiasJessop said:

No, they are really not ready for this. They cannot even distinguish between stationary and moving items at speeds greater than 50MPH, and cyclist detection is sh*t. As ever, a big issue is interfacing. In this case, with other road users - and not just car drivers.

Too many people are drinking the Waymo and Tesla kool-aid. They're dong great stuff, but don't buy their hype.

I hope I'm wrong about the above, but don't believe I am.

There's a road that I use to get to work which I really can't see how driverless cars could use as it stands at the moment. It's a route in to a small town, but because residents park along it, there's really only room for cars to pass in one direction over several sections. It all works very well at the moment, with people politely letting a few cars pass, and then someone will stop to let the traffic in the other direction have a go.

The other thing I don't see is how truly driverless cars will handle things like parking in a field for, say, a wedding or a car boot sale.

I rather suspect that last 1% of the problem is going to take a lot longer to sort out that the industry expects. Might work better in big cities, though.

"The first 90 percent of the code accounts for the first 90 percent of the development time. The remaining 10 percent of the code accounts for the other 90 percent of the development time."

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ninety-ninety_rule

I have no doubt that Waymo and others hahve got some blooming impressive technology that works the majority of the time - especially in geofenced areas. It's getting it working all the time that will be the killer - for instance the edge and corner cases.

TheWhiteRabbit said:

RobD said:

SouthamObserver said:

Blimey ...
https://twitter.com/tbonier/status/1057625166920990722?s=21

How many of those were able to vote at elections previously?

Every time we have this. Once in a blue moon does an unexpected tide roll in

If there's one thing that's never unexpected, I'd have thought tides were it. Blue moons might cause them, mind.

Richard_Nabavi said:

OldKingCole said:

Richard_Nabavi said:

tpfkar said:

Can you give any example of how the Lib Dems screwed up the health reforms? That seems quite a partisan re-writing of history from here.

Most notably by insisting that one of the most vital advantages, competition on price by service providers, was removed (they'd previously supported it). That of course made a nonsense of the whole point of improving efficiency through price discovery and incentivising efficient operation. They also insisted on a whole raft of extra layers of bureaucracy, making it much more cumbersome and expensive than Lansley had originally proposed.

Well, we’ve seen how competition by price has worked in other areas of public service. Ruskin’s adage is still true.

It works extremely well. No-one suggests that the government should fix the price of buying computers or road construction services or MRI scanners. Why should they fix the price of buying hip operations so that there is zero incentive to do them more efficiently?

Because, generally speaking, the people performing hip operations, and other aspects of medical care are motivated to do the best for their patients. Money per operation doesn’t come into it.

Richard_Nabavi said:

tpfkar said:

Can you give any example of how the Lib Dems screwed up the health reforms? That seems quite a partisan re-writing of history from here.

Most notably by insisting that one of the most vital advantages, competition on price by service providers, was removed (they'd previously supported it). That of course made a nonsense of the whole point of improving efficiency through price discovery and incentivising efficient operation. They also insisted on a whole raft of extra layers of bureaucracy, making it much more cumbersome and expensive than Lansley had originally proposed.

That was the headline at the time but was hardly justified. Public sector commissioning rules require a clearly set out evaluation criteria in advance, typically weighting quality and price (and potentiallly smaller factors such as social value or organisational resilience.)
The idea that this wasn't happening beforehand or that the Lib Dems had anything to do with affecting the evaluation criteria on individual procurements is quite some re-writing of history. Of course that's different from saying that every successful bidder deliverers as promised....

The clause you refer to relates to the role of Monitor the health watchdog (now subsumed into NHS Improvement) and quite why they should have a different remit to the existing rules seemed unclear to me - certainly not a clear-cut 'advantage.'

As for the rest - any chance of some examples of the 'whole raft of extra layers of bureaucracy'? The reforms were fearsomely complex, but the idea that Lansley had a simple idea until the Lib Dems made it complicated seems wishful thinking rather than reality to me.

Channel 4 is going to Leeds, with Bristol and Glasgow as creative hubs.

Recidivist said:

rottenborough said:

Labour all over the place post-budget.

Maybe an early GE is not quite in their interests as they all seem to think...

Really?

What's Labour's Achilles Heal? Not being trusted with the public purse.

So there is a news story that Labour are disagreeing over public spending. For the majority of people who don't follow the details that is all they will hear. What impression is that likely to make? That Labour is talking about important serious stuff like money.

Sounds like a perfect bit of news management to me.

It's the Labour members who pay attention. They are the ones going "Huh???" about McDonnell's Budget response....

tpfkar said:

Richard_Nabavi said:

tpfkar said:

Can you give any example of how the Lib Dems screwed up the health reforms? That seems quite a partisan re-writing of history from here.

Most notably by insisting that one of the most vital advantages, competition on price by service providers, was removed (they'd previously supported it). That of course made a nonsense of the whole point of improving efficiency through price discovery and incentivising efficient operation. They also insisted on a whole raft of extra layers of bureaucracy, making it much more cumbersome and expensive than Lansley had originally proposed.

That was the headline at the time but was hardly justified. Public sector commissioning rules require a clearly set out evaluation criteria in advance, typically weighting quality and price (and potentiallly smaller factors such as social value or organisational resilience.)
The idea that this wasn't happening beforehand or that the Lib Dems had anything to do with affecting the evaluation criteria on individual procurements is quite some re-writing of history. Of course that's different from saying that every successful bidder deliverers as promised....

The clause you refer to relates to the role of Monitor the health watchdog (now subsumed into NHS Improvement) and quite why they should have a different remit to the existing rules seemed unclear to me - certainly not a clear-cut 'advantage.'

As for the rest - any chance of some examples of the 'whole raft of extra layers of bureaucracy'? The reforms were fearsomely complex, but the idea that Lansley had a simple idea until the Lib Dems made it complicated seems wishful thinking rather than reality to me.

Quite.

DecrepitJohnL said:

AramintaMoonbeamQC said:

ydoethur said:

TheScreamingEagles said:

Peter Bone says Phil Hammond is the Prince of Brexit.

I told you all to back Hammond as next PM, history is on his side.

http://www2.politicalbetting.com/index.php/archives/2018/08/05/history-suggests-one-of-philip-hammond-jeremy-hunt-and-sajid-javid-will-be-theresa-mays-successor-if-she-goes-before-the-next-election/

I always knew Cameron wasn't completely stupid:

Overnight it emerged David Cameron regards Michael Gove as a lunatic and that might hinder Gove’s chances.

Although it does beg the question of why he left him at Education for so many years...

Because he couldn't give a toss about state schools, so let Gove introduce multiple chaotic reforms to structures, funding, qualifications and initial teacher training.

He only punted him when focus groups showed him that Gove's tenure in this role was hugely unpopular. The DfE are still trying to clear up the mess.

What is odd is that in Opposition under Cameron, all the spin was how extensively the Tories were preparing for government, yet Lansley, Gove and IDS all unleashed ill-conceived revolutions that seemed to take colleagues by surprise. Did the Shadow Cabinet not talk to each other?

It doesn't look like it.

From my POV, Cameron was only interested in certain briefs, and generally just allowed others free rein, until it became clear that things were going wrong.

We're now mired in a massive recruitment and retention crisis, in the face of rising pupil numbers. Recruitment crisis can be attributed in large part to stupid and over-complex changes to initial teacher training routes (although there are of course other factors involved).