politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Marf on the segregation debate

politicalbetting.com is proudly powered by WordPress
with "Neat!" theme. Entries (RSS) and Comments (RSS).
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
The only possible resolution I can see is for the central government to give Catalonia more powers, including the right to keep all the tax money it collects and to protect the Catalan language in any way it sees fit. Independence is not something that is just going to go away, that is for sure.
There is not the same pressure for separation in the Basque country because outside of defence, foreign affairs and a few infrastructure related issues the Basques essentially look after themselves. Most Catalans would be happy with the same. The current central government, which is Spanish nationalist, will not concede that. The Socialists probably would, but they are unlikely to win the next election. No Madrid party will agree to a Catalan independence referendum.
Basically, what we have right now are two very stubborn centre right governments in Madrid and Barcelona refusing to budge an inch, with a much more left wing, much more aggressive party in Catalonia ready to become the biggest party in the Parliament there. I can see this running and running and it getting tenser and tenser, until at some stage someone relatively unimportant (a colonel, a captain, someone in the Catalan police force) does something very stupid and people get killed. At that stage the EU will step in and a deal will be forced on both sides, with the Catalans basically getting what the Basques have.
This is all very, very Spanish.
:all-happy-clappy:
There may be a great wailing and gnashing of teeth ahead.
Co-operation is a conjoined expression: As in Co-Op for co-operation co-operative.* Please try....
* Orf to the local hostelry.... :oops:
I've barely started mine.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2523658/Muslim-campaigners-protest-sale-alcohol-popular-East-London-area.html
On another note, Miliband desperately needs to sack Balls. It's incredible how the political momentum has swung back to the Tories - and to George Osborne in particular - after his omnishambolic response to the Autumn Statement.
We'll see. I'll be surprised if anything happens.
A bit disconcerting as this is Brick Lane in London, - but is it not a public order offense as verbal threats of violence are illegal?
Have you heard of the concept of 'bouncers'?
'A bit disconcerting as this is Brick Lane in London, - but is it not a public order offense as verbal threats of violence are illegal?'
Yes,for everyone else.
So when they come across a choice between increasing their own power (e.g. pandering to Muslims to retain or get their vote) or trashing the Working Classes, it's a no-brainer for them.
I've noticed David Cameron doing the same to Christians in this country and, worse, the Middle East.
As mentioned in my earlier posts, allowing immigrants into this country will change it. Don't start complaining when it starts to affect you.
Another innings goes by and my double century ticket looks more and more useless.
Raceclear haven't exactly contributed to the mortgage repayment fund today either. Ahem.
There is a difference, in that a political party is allowed to decide who attends its events. If a university makes it clear that it imposes no rules on seating in events that take place on its premises, then I am not sure that event stewards would have any authority to try to impose them. In any case, if you are just sitting quietly in an event that you are allowed to attend (eg a public meeting) I would hope that a court would regard it as unreasonable to use force to eject you.
Here? (Remember the context was pandering to minorities) Gay Marriage. The way he panders to a noisy but demographically weak group shows his utter cluelessness. That Christians were also expected to spearhead his Big Society just compounded the impression. Labour at least panders to a large and fast-growing group.
Just look at the bottom of the cartoon. That did make me chuckle.
Most persuasive.
OTOH, its more good news for UKIP.
Are the people who had a gay marriage not Christians also..
Its a joke, and the luvvies that let it happen are putting a match to gunpowder
Read "The Road To National Suicide" speech by Enoch Powell.. he predicts exactly this, that extremists on each side will poison neighbourhoods and in the middle will be apologist for the immigrants refusing to condemn them
I'm an Englishman and I'm backing England to turn this around*
*hope more than expectation but I am getting up at 2.30am to watch the first session.
21 retiring MPs have so far had their replacements selected.
17 of those retiring MPs are white men.
7 of the replacements are white men.
6 of the 7 are Tories, the exception being Matthew Pennycook in Greenwich & Woolwich.
If so, why?
Aus 1.64/1.65
The Draw 4.7/4.8
The clear cut move last night was to back the draw then lay off. Not so sure about this evening.
I think UKIP will do very well in Havering (aided by the implosion of Romford Conservatives) Dagenham, Bexley, Bromley, and parts of Sutton, Hillingdon, and Croydon.
2 Con women (including 1 BAME)
1 Plaid woman
3 LD women
1 BAME Con man
The LDs have selected Julie Pörksen to replace Alan Beith, and Lisa Smart to take over from Andrew Stunell.
The Conservatives have chosen Nusrat Ghani to replace Charles Hendry, and Lucy Frazer to replace Jim Paice.
http://www.westbriton.co.uk/Candidates-line-Truro-Falmouth-general-election/story-20303415-detail/story.html
Possibly the oldest PPC selected to replace a retiring MP so far in this parliament. In 2015 we had older people entering the Commons for the first time.
Aus +1.33
Eng +78.85
Draw +0.86
Now come on Bell make that century
The peer, who served in the Thatcher and Major governments, was 'arguably the greatest Welshman of his generation' said Welsh Secretary David Jones":
http://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/lord-roberts-conwy-died-age-6405283
I trust you agree that the British Government attempted to undermine the Syrian Government and then overthrow it, or was that defeat for Cameron in the House of Commons just "my opinion".
Christian minorities in the Middle East (Iraq, Egypt, Syria) crave stability. A fall of a government leads to a (perhaps temporary) breakdown in law and order, which is lethal to small minority communities.
Here are examples:
http://www.catholicherald.co.uk/news/2013/12/12/syrian-bishop-appeals-for-release-of-kidnapped-nuns/
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2352251/Horrific-video-shows-Syrian-Catholic-priest-beheaded-jihadist-fighters-cheering-crowd.html
Note that Cameron's Government is officially supporting the perpetrators.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/nov/15/uk-syrian-opposition-william-hague
Getting the sources for this posting has put any difficulties Christians have in this country into perspective, but has convinced be why 'Clueless Dave' will easily lose the next election.
I think the last time Gib won anything overseas was Miss World 2009
This:
twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/411803705080422402
For the sake of my children getting Christmas presents, food on the table etc etc.
Mr. Observer, it's slightly cold and horrid right now. Well, here it is, anyway.
Mr. T, an excellent idea for a blog.
Mr. Ninoinoz, Cameron is not responsible for the medieval style war crimes being perpetrated in Syria, or the persecution of Christians. As for 'persecuting' them here by putting through gay marriage: marriage is not the property of Christianity, nor are all Christians against gay marriage.
She's had a lot more than that cos she opted for a jury trial and a not guilty plea so they've been postponing the court case (six times so far IIRC) and persecuting her ever since and trying to get her committed and take her kid as a way to get her to change her plea. The last postponement was April or May this year (again IIRC I may have missed another postponement since).
There are a number of people in Britain who basically appear to be bonkers. None of them should get any media attention whatever, except on page 17 to say they've been prosecuted if they actually break the law.
Why don't more Labour party members, MPs, Ex MPs, whoever, stop the mealy mouthed bullshit and just say "Yes, I think xxx xxxx should be locked up" without insulting the intelligence of us all by letting us know that anyone who does it should be?
Its just a long way of saying "its not only muslims you know", and the sort of behaviour that I think will (hopefully) lose them a lot of votes from the type of person that used to consider themselves a Labour man/woman
As for gay "marriage" not being anti-Christian, I await the lawsuit against churches.
To segue into another argument on this thread, I note that illegal Muslim marriages (i.e. most of them) are left unprosecuted. I somehow think this will not be true of churches.
I fear there will be lawsuits against churches. Unfortunately the rights agenda that seems to hold sway is less about common sense compromise and more about a pissing contest of whose rights matter more.
However from the mail article "warned restaurants and shops in the Brick Lane area that they face 40 lashes if they continue to sell the product" that by my book is hate speech
"Hate speech is, outside the law, communication that vilifies a person or a group based on discrimination against that person or group.[1][2]"against off license owners and staff.
It should be dealth with as such, and the book thrown at Choudhary.