Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Options

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The first leader out betting. (Also known as how much the worl

SystemSystem Posts: 11,015
edited June 2017 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The first leader out betting. (Also known as how much the world has changed in the last ten days)

THE SUNDAY TIMES: "Tories tell May: You have 10 days" #tomorrowspaperstoday pic.twitter.com/8TZEB20YuI

Read the full story here


«1345

Comments

  • Options
    fitalassfitalass Posts: 4,279
    First
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    Second! Like LABOUR......
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    No doubt TSE will be checking this anxiously.......

    http://hastheresamayresignedyet.com
  • Options
    nunuonenunuone Posts: 1,138
    Fourth like Britain!
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    Corbyn is set to see off his second Tory Prime Minster in just his first two years as Labour leader.

    http://hastheresamayresignedyet.com
  • Options
    nunununu Posts: 6,024

    No doubt TSE will be checking this anxiously.......

    http://hastheresamayresignedyet.com

    bloody hell.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    nunu said:

    No doubt TSE will be checking this anxiously.......

    http://hastheresamayresignedyet.com

    bloody hell.
    Has anyone registered http://hastsepostedhisavthreadyet.com ?

    *innocent face*
  • Options
    numbertwelvenumbertwelve Posts: 5,441
    The Tories seem (on the face of this article) to be ready to hit the self destruct button. A leadership contest now makes a Corbyn premiership all the more likely.
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    Catch22 has now set in for the Conservatives. Snookered and every attempt to get out will fail and be called a miss..
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608

    The Tories seem (on the face of this article) to be ready to hit the self destruct button. A leadership contest now makes a Corbyn premiership all the more likely.

    Which is why it won't happen. Despite the feverish imaginings of the acolytes of the editor of a Russian owned freesheet.....
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    The other problem for the Tories has been the complete dysfunctionslity of CCHQ and their requirement of all to not question any of their actions. Members are not allowed to criticise for fear of "reprisals". That has now changed. Watch over the nect few weeks for signs of that.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    RobD said:

    nunu said:

    No doubt TSE will be checking this anxiously.......

    http://hastheresamayresignedyet.com

    bloody hell.
    Has anyone registered http://hastsepostedhisavthreadyet.com ?

    *innocent face*
    Nor this one either:

    http://osborneforpm.com
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    edited June 2017

    RobD said:

    nunu said:

    No doubt TSE will be checking this anxiously.......

    http://hastheresamayresignedyet.com

    bloody hell.
    Has anyone registered http://hastsepostedhisavthreadyet.com ?

    *innocent face*
    Nor this one either:

    http://osborneforpm.com
    Hmm. what about http://themostpopularheirtoabaronetcyintherealmforpm.com?

    I'll get my coat.
  • Options
    RobDRobD Posts: 58,961
    edited June 2017
    Must say, all this talk about the Queen's response (see the Times in the header for example) is a perfect example of why an hereditary constitutional monarchy is truly the best form of government. :D
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    edited June 2017
    Nothing like the Tory party for kicking someone when they're down. If they got behind her and stopped plotting she would be much more able to deal with the current crises.

    It takes a lot for me to sympathise with a brexiteer in trouble but when I see people trying to crucify her for not 'doing' sympathy properly I start feeling queasy. Remember they did the same to HRH when Diana died and a more excruciating example of tawdry mob rule I can't remember seeing.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300

    The Tories seem (on the face of this article) to be ready to hit the self destruct button. A leadership contest now makes a Corbyn premiership all the more likely.

    How? What is the mechanism by which Theresa May being replaced gets Corbyn into Number 10? It is far more likely, based on historical precedent, that the new Conservative prime minister will enjoy a honeymoon.
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,149

    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.

    Summer recess? They're supposed to be renegotiating basically half a century of essential shit with their main trading partners. They need to do it now. Why are they wasting 10 days?
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    Roger said:

    Nothing like the Tory party for kicking someone when they're down.

    Oh I think the Socialist Workers can trump that - attacking her on the basis of an unknown body count from a fresh disaster.....
  • Options
    GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191

    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.

    Summer recess? They're supposed to be renegotiating basically half a century of essential shit with their main trading partners. They need to do it now. Why are they wasting 10 days?
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-confirm-two-year-parliament-to-deliver-brexit-and-beyond
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,181
    BBC don't know that the rules on the Tory leadership have changed either - they're wittering on about stalking horses as well.
  • Options
    tlg86tlg86 Posts: 25,189
    ydoethur said:

    BBC don't know that the rules on the Tory leadership have changed either - they're wittering on about stalking horses as well.

    Same on Sky News.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Gadfly said:

    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.

    Summer recess? They're supposed to be renegotiating basically half a century of essential shit with their main trading partners. They need to do it now. Why are they wasting 10 days?
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-confirm-two-year-parliament-to-deliver-brexit-and-beyond
    It doesnt mention the recess or imply continuous sitting though so im not sure
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891

    Roger said:

    Nothing like the Tory party for kicking someone when they're down.

    Oh I think the Socialist Workers can trump that - attacking her on the basis of an unknown body count from a fresh disaster.....
    That one passed me by??
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,181
    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    BBC don't know that the rules on the Tory leadership have changed either - they're wittering on about stalking horses as well.

    Same on Sky News.
    Pathetic. Do none of them know how to look at a rule book?

    Although it wouldn't totally surprise me to learn the real mistake was made by a disgruntled and rather dim backbencher stirring the pot without knowing what they're talking about.

    Anyone know where Anna Soubry is?
  • Options
    I can see three potential crisis points coming up at which May could be forced out, and there's always the possibility of an unexpected crisis.

    Brexit - if any ministers resign rather than endorse whatever deal May comes up with she will be in trouble, especially if they're big names.

    The Grenfell tower inquiry - if Conservative politicians get any of the blame the party will suffer. If they don't, May will be accused of a whitewash.

    The 2018 locals - a bad performance and many Conservative MPs will write May off as an electoral liability.

    If May survives all three she can probably last until the next general election.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Nothing like the Tory party for kicking someone when they're down.

    Oh I think the Socialist Workers can trump that - attacking her on the basis of an unknown body count from a fresh disaster.....
    That one passed me by??
    The SWP were prominent among the demonstrators outside number 10 claiming May had "blood on her hands" for the Grenfell disaster. The last time May was involved in housing was as a local councillor 30 years ago.....
  • Options
    GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191
    nichomar said:

    Gadfly said:

    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.

    Summer recess? They're supposed to be renegotiating basically half a century of essential shit with their main trading partners. They need to do it now. Why are they wasting 10 days?
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-confirm-two-year-parliament-to-deliver-brexit-and-beyond
    It doesnt mention the recess or imply continuous sitting though so im not sure
    Me neither.
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,256
    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    BBC don't know that the rules on the Tory leadership have changed either - they're wittering on about stalking horses as well.

    Same on Sky News.
    Pathetic. Do none of them know how to look at a rule book?

    Although it wouldn't totally surprise me to learn the real mistake was made by a disgruntled and rather dim backbencher stirring the pot without knowing what they're talking about.

    Anyone know where Anna Soubry is?
    It hardly comes as news that leading Brexiters don't bother to find out all the facts before deciding what to do?

    It is equally possible that she has already decided to go, but knows that she has to see through the QS and the stub end of the current parliament, before resigning to allow a contest in the summer.
  • Options
    stodgestodge Posts: 12,841
    timmo said:

    Catch22 has now set in for the Conservatives. Snookered and every attempt to get out will fail and be called a miss..

    I have no sympathy not because I'm not a Conservative but because this is an entirely self-inflicted wound. Instead of stunning Labour and Jeremy Corbyn with blows to the heart and brain, the Conservatives have shot themselves in both feet and put a round between the eyes for good measure.

    You really don't get it - two months ago you had it all, a dominant and popular personality as Prime Minister, commanding poll leads and facing an Opposition for whom every spokesman or spokeswoman's interview was a "car crash" (apparently).

    Yet that wasn't enough - hubris set in, all you had to do was a short snap Presidential campaign, expose Corbyn for the bumbling, socialist non-entity he really was, send May and her message into the heartlands and the landslide was inevitable.

    100 seat majority, 150 seat majority, all seemed possible if not probable.

    The whole thing was built on hubris and sand - May turns out to have the charisma of a dead pot plant and the voter appeal of last week's leftover curry.

    Oh, but wait, here comes the bleating - we won 13 million votes and 318 seats, we still won, everyone still likes us, we are still the Government, we are still in power.

    But that's the point - the people have the power, not you, and the election proved it. Yes, they don't want Corbyn to be Prime Minister but they didn't want May to have untrammeled power either. They've left an ungodly mess but it's your mess, it was your election, it was your hubris.

    I've seen little sign of humility in the Conservative ranks on here - shock, yes, incomprehension maybe and the traditional lashing out at CCHQ, the BBC, the voters etc, etc.

    It's time to realise you're not the only game in town - there are people with opinions, ideas and plans for Brexit and many other things but they aren't and won't be Conservatives. You need to find a way to reach out, include and be inclusive and it starts with acknowledging your own mistakes and stupidity.

    Deal with it.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Gadfly said:

    nichomar said:

    Gadfly said:

    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.

    Summer recess? They're supposed to be renegotiating basically half a century of essential shit with their main trading partners. They need to do it now. Why are they wasting 10 days?
    https://www.gov.uk/government/news/government-to-confirm-two-year-parliament-to-deliver-brexit-and-beyond
    It doesnt mention the recess or imply continuous sitting though so im not sure
    Me neither.
    I wonder if its more to do with the DUP deal being time bounded with no new proposals until the next queens speach in 2019
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.

    Summer recess? They're supposed to be renegotiating basically half a century of essential shit with their main trading partners. They need to do it now. Why are they wasting 10 days?
    As the USA is our main trading partner* I'm not sure that 10 days is significant either way.

    * United States: US$60.4 billion (14.8% of total UK exports)
    http://www.worldstopexports.com/united-kingdoms-top-import-partners/
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
  • Options
    IcarusIcarus Posts: 898
    Regarding the up coming Conservative leadership election, I am surprised that once called it only takes 2 MPs -a proposer and seconder to nominate candidates.

    Unlike the Labour party that requires 12.5% of MPs to nominate a candidate. The Labour Party system stops the nomination of odd ball candidates without significant backing of MPs being put forward to the party members. Oh wait a minute....
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Hammond on Marr and Peston
  • Options
    nigel4englandnigel4england Posts: 4,800
    I think there should be an amnesty for all illegal immigrants in this country (though not saying anyone living in Grenfell is an illegal immigrant).

    With Brexit it seems we are starting afresh with immigration so we may as well know who is here and get them on to the system.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    GeoffM said:

    If Theresa May is to be replaced, it should be done quickly so the process can be completed during the summer recess and in the window provided by Germany's election in September.

    Summer recess? They're supposed to be renegotiating basically half a century of essential shit with their main trading partners. They need to do it now. Why are they wasting 10 days?
    As the USA is our main trading partner* I'm not sure that 10 days is significant either way.

    * United States: US$60.4 billion (14.8% of total UK exports)
    http://www.worldstopexports.com/united-kingdoms-top-import-partners/
    What are you implying, that the EU doesnt matter? If so try adding up the different EU country figures
  • Options
    PeterCPeterC Posts: 1,274
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    BBC don't know that the rules on the Tory leadership have changed either - they're wittering on about stalking horses as well.

    Same on Sky News.
    Pathetic. Do none of them know how to look at a rule book?

    Although it wouldn't totally surprise me to learn the real mistake was made by a disgruntled and rather dim backbencher stirring the pot without knowing what they're talking about.

    Anyone know where Anna Soubry is?
    It hardly comes as news that leading Brexiters don't bother to find out all the facts before deciding what to do?

    It is equally possible that she has already decided to go, but knows that she has to see through the QS and the stub end of the current parliament, before resigning to allow a contest in the summer.
    She must either go when parliament rises or she stays until the end of A50.
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    This is the time when I realise yet again that there is a loathsome element in the Tory party , fgortuately that element is not as bad as the worst in Labour, but its a close run thing.
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040

    This is the time when I realise yet again that there is a loathsome element in the Tory party , fgortuately that element is not as bad as the worst in Labour, but its a close run thing.

    Good try my right wing friend!
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    Good morning, everyone.

    Ironically, this is repeating the May mistake as far as perceptions go. She 'saw off' Boris and Gove, and Leadsom, all of whom imploded. There was no excellence (one could argue, and I did, it was masterly inactivity, the problem only arising when she actually tried to say or do anything and it turned out to be rubbish) of May, just weakness of her foes.

    Corbyn isn't seeing off PMs. They're ruining themselves by failing to judge or appeal to the public mood sufficiently.

    Cameron could've easily won the referendum had he not been so contemptuous towards the basket of deplorables (sorry, Little Englanders). May could've easily won the election by a landslide had she not decided that three weeks before polling days was the perfect time to scare the Conservative core vote shitless with an untested policy for the demented.

    Corbyn has improved, and that's something that should concern everyone who isn't far left. But the departure of Cameron, and future departure of May, is down to their failings, not Corbyn's excellence.
  • Options
    murali_smurali_s Posts: 3,040
    Hopefully the Home Office backs off.
  • Options
    nigel4englandnigel4england Posts: 4,800

    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Nothing like the Tory party for kicking someone when they're down.

    Oh I think the Socialist Workers can trump that - attacking her on the basis of an unknown body count from a fresh disaster.....
    That one passed me by??
    The SWP were prominent among the demonstrators outside number 10 claiming May had "blood on her hands" for the Grenfell disaster. The last time May was involved in housing was as a local councillor 30 years ago.....
    Whereas the new MP for Kensington was involved with housing very recently:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/labours-new-kensington-mp-was-on-housing-scrutiny-committee-a3566661.html
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited June 2017
    Conservative Crackpot Coalition Of Chaos Update :

    CCCC Day 10 - 0745am

    Auchentennach Bugle News Quiz - All the Following Statement Are True Except One :

    1. Tens days on from election day the is still no C&S deal with the DUP
    2. The PM's approval rating is now greater than net minus 30
    3. The 2018 Queen's Speech is cancelled before the 2017 has been delivered.
    4. TSE's Grenfell donation of red shoes has been rejected as survivors are traumatized enough.
    5. The Daily Telegraph is now a Poundshop "Daily Express"
    6. Conservative K&C Council hand delivered dog fouling letters in Grenfell area on Thursday.
    7. SeanT had his greatest ever orgasm yesterday. (last thread)
    8. JackW will host a BBQ (whatever that is !!) today.

    ...................................................

    Sadly the correct answer is not the one about outdoor cremated meat, a swimming pool and bizarre "yoof" music .... :cry:


  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    JackW said:

    Conservative Crackpot Coalition Of Chaos Update :

    CCCC Day 10 - 0745am

    Auchentennach Bugle News Quiz - All the Following Statement Are True Except One :

    1. Tens days on from election day the is still no C&S deal with the DUP
    2. The PM's approval rating is now greater than net minus 30
    3. The 2018 Queen's Speech is cancelled before the 2017 has been delivered.
    4. TSE's Grenfell donation of red shoes has been rejected as survivors are traumatized enough.
    5. The Daily Telegraph is now a Poundshop "Daily Express"
    6. Conservative K&C Council hand delivered dog fouling letters in Grenfell area on Thursday.
    7. SeanT had his greatest ever orgasm yesterday. (last thread)
    8. JackW will host a BBQ (whatever that is !!) today.


    Must be no 4
  • Options
    GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071
    Scott_P said:
    Did they test "Do you know what Customs Union means?" before asking if we should leave it?

  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,360
    I smell toast.

    Party whips received information this weekend that some MPs have started to draft letters of no confidence against Mrs May.

    These will be sent to the party’s backbench 1922 Committee if her performance fails to improve before the first Commons votes on the Queen’s Speech in ten days’ time.

    A contest would be triggered if the committee receives 48 letters – 15 per cent of the parliamentary party – with Mr Johnson and Mr Davis already established as the clear frontrunners.

    And last night, The Mail on Sunday was told by one senior pro-Brexit MP that he would be ‘astounded’ if letters had not gone in already.

    He said plans were being hatched to present Mrs May with ‘an ultimatum’ that she had to go and be replaced if possible by a new leader, installed unopposed to avoid a divisive contest.

    The MP said: ‘The mood towards Theresa completely changed last week. We started thinking she could limp on for a few months. But her response to the Grenfell Tower tragedy has telescoped that into a matter of days or weeks.’

    He said Mr Johnson was probably most people’s preferred choice.

    Returning to their constituencies after being sworn in at Westminster, Tory MPs were taken aback at the scale of the anger of grassroots party activists over Mrs May’s performance last week.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4614492/Wounded-knees-PM-faces-civil-war.html#ixzz4kJh7aSDh
  • Options
    CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    There were rumours (no idea if the veracity) that there was a lot of illegal sub-letting at Grenfell Tower (often to undocumented immigrants) - one of the reasons the identification process is proving so difficult
  • Options
    SquareRootSquareRoot Posts: 7,095
    GeoffM said:

    Scott_P said:
    Did they test "Do you know what Customs Union means?" before asking if we should leave it?

    I am amazed anyone uses the results of any poll to suggest anything. Its all hocus pocus
  • Options
    TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 114,360
    I believe Jolyon is one of many eminent members of the legal profession who have offered to work pro bono for those affected by the fire.

    I believe he is also helping organise the help.
  • Options
    ydoethurydoethur Posts: 67,181
    IanB2 said:

    ydoethur said:

    tlg86 said:

    ydoethur said:

    BBC don't know that the rules on the Tory leadership have changed either - they're wittering on about stalking horses as well.

    Same on Sky News.
    Pathetic. Do none of them know how to look at a rule book?

    Although it wouldn't totally surprise me to learn the real mistake was made by a disgruntled and rather dim backbencher stirring the pot without knowing what they're talking about.

    Anyone know where Anna Soubry is?
    It hardly comes as news that leading Brexiters don't bother to find out all the facts before deciding what to do?
    Anna Soubry is a Brixiteer?

    She hid that well...
  • Options
    stodgestodge Posts: 12,841

    Good morning, everyone.

    Ironically, this is repeating the May mistake as far as perceptions go. She 'saw off' Boris and Gove, and Leadsom, all of whom imploded. There was no excellence (one could argue, and I did, it was masterly inactivity, the problem only arising when she actually tried to say or do anything and it turned out to be rubbish) of May, just weakness of her foes.

    Corbyn isn't seeing off PMs. They're ruining themselves by failing to judge or appeal to the public mood sufficiently.

    Cameron could've easily won the referendum had he not been so contemptuous towards the basket of deplorables (sorry, Little Englanders). May could've easily won the election by a landslide had she not decided that three weeks before polling days was the perfect time to scare the Conservative core vote shitless with an untested policy for the demented.

    Corbyn has improved, and that's something that should concern everyone who isn't far left. But the departure of Cameron, and future departure of May, is down to their failings, not Corbyn's excellence.

    Morning, Mr Dancer. I actually watched a little bit of the Grand Prix last weekend - really ?

    You are quite right - the current Conservative leader (and her predecessor) both completely misjudged and misread the public mood. Now, is that down to poor advice or poor political instincts ?

    I don't know yet we were being constantly told on here how popular May was and how she should call an election and how easily she'd win it and all that nonsense.

    Corbyn is, as Nick Palmer told us, completely what he seems. He's avuncular and easy going and reminds me of a modern Harold Wilson in that regard. I begin to wonder how much of the Conservative vote of 8/6 was really an anti-Corbyn vote and as he starts to look a more viable alternative, whether we will see Conservative numbers plunge further.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    Scott_P said:
    And that's day one. Imagine in a couple of weeks when things start getting sticky. Messrs Johnson Gove Fox Farage and Hoey have a lot to answer for turning a well ordered well repected country into a fractious third world laughing stock
  • Options
    RochdalePioneersRochdalePioneers Posts: 27,190
    I love politics.

    Prime Minister Theresa May. Left in office by a party despite her politically harming herself and the party every day because although they agree she has to go they cant agree who comes next. Her behaviour so poor that it's pretty obvious to her MPs and other observers that she's suffering from some kind of depressive state.

    Unable to negotiate a deal with the DUP without prompting war inside the party or the 6 counties but definitely the suitable person to lead our impossibly hard Brexit talks next week.

    Presenting a 2 year programme of government because why bother with a confidence issue next year when you don't have to. Which will contain ? We know her manifesto will be rejected by everyone else including the DUP whether they pass it as a QS or not. We know that on the only issue that counts a sizeable number of her own MPs won't for a soft Brexit line but she doesn't have a majority in the house for hard Brexit either.

    So despite all the guff spoken on here about winning millions of votes and most seats, please tell me what power and authority she has. Or what power or authority a replacement will have to get Brexit through without losing a significant number of Tory and with it the majority?

    Tories. If she stays, you're done. If she goes, you're done. Europe has torn you apart again.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    I do find the calm, mainly civilised debate of morning pb.com far more enlghtening than the wine and gin fuelled atmosphere of the later evening!
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    Mr. Stodge, it was a very good race to watch.

    Corbyn is not what he seems. His mealy-mouthed claims on Trident ring hollow. He's a far left fool, backed up by a Marxist Shadow Chancellor.
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Do we have an impeachment procedure in this country? Surely not or Cameron would already be on trial.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Do we have an impeachment procedure in this country? Surely not or Cameron would already be on trial.

    Last one was 1806 process now considered obsolete
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Mr. Stodge, ..... Corbyn is not what he seems. His mealy-mouthed claims on Trident ring hollow. He's a far left fool, backed up by a Marxist Shadow Chancellor.

    And yet now Jezza enjoys approval ratings and a poll lead that Mrs May can only dream of and yet had herself and better but a few short weeks ago.

    Funny old business this politics lark.

  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,949
    Lib Dem Leadership Odds:

    Since diving to 1.5 on Betfair Jo Swinson has been drifting out for days, now 2.4 to back. Betway is the first bookie to follow suit, moving her to 2.25. Everyone else still around 1.5.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Do we have an impeachment procedure in this country? Surely not or Cameron would already be on trial.

    BREXIT will happen, only the details are to be negotiated.

    Oh .... but those "details" !!
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    Mr. Quincel, cheers for that update, but mildly miffed as I backed her a smidgen more at 1.8 just yesterday.

    I wonder if she's not going to stand.

    Mr. W, Flavius Phocas also enjoyed substantial popularity immediately prior to his reign.
  • Options
    Dura_AceDura_Ace Posts: 12,985
    Great idea. There'll be about 10,000 people who'll claim to have been living there.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    Charles said:

    There were rumours (no idea if the veracity) that there was a lot of illegal sub-letting at Grenfell Tower (often to undocumented immigrants) - one of the reasons the identification process is proving so difficult
    From some of the tweets on Mr Maugham's Twitter that would indeed appear to be the case - which of course makes their interaction with the authorities in seeking assistance fraught.
  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,949
    Mark Pack's survey (not poll) of LD members (which was very close last time, however):

    "Jo Swinson is the runaway favourite

    When asked to rate the 11 Liberal Democrat MPs other than Tim Farron in order of preference for party leader, 57% gave Jo Swinson their first preference.
    No other candidate got even as high as 15% of first preferences. On that showing, she would win in the first round in any contest. Even if her vote dipped below 50% in an actual contest, she draws second preferences widely from the supporters of all other MPs, and would still win with ease based on this survey.
    Because of her clear lead over all other candidates combined, it does not matter what combination of other candidates there really are when it comes to the actual election. She would win easily whatever the actual line up is.

    If Jo Swinson doesn't stand...

    Lamb slightly ahead of Cable - If Jo Swinson wins clearly whatever the combination of candidates, it's a very different picture if she doesn't stand. Rerunning the count with her votes transferred over to their second preferences gives a very close looking race with Norman Lamb fractionally ahead of Vince Cable with 30% to his 29%. Edward Davey is on 18% and the other MPs share the rest of the support, with Layla Moran the best of the rest on 8%.
    If all the other candidates are eliminated and votes transferred to Norman Lamb or Vince Cable, Norman Lamb extends his lead, just, to a 52% - 48% margin over Vince Cable.
    Note: It is possible these figures under-estimate Norman Lamb's actual support compared with Vince Cable as the responses slightly over-represent London members, where Vince Cable is stronger, and also the proportion recalling that they voted for Norman Lamb rather than Tim Farron in 2015 is on the low side (though that may be the usual effect of people's memories changing or fading to the detriment of the non-winner when recalling how they voted). The first factor, however, is, at most, not large and the second is unknown.
    Cable ahead of Davey - If Norman Lamb also does not stand, then Vince Cable wins out over Edward Davey 57%-43%."
  • Options
    stodgestodge Posts: 12,841

    Mr. Stodge, it was a very good race to watch.

    Corbyn is not what he seems. His mealy-mouthed claims on Trident ring hollow. He's a far left fool, backed up by a Marxist Shadow Chancellor.

    The point though is that for many people that's irrelevant. I look at my own circumstances and I have basically stood still since 2010 - the only saving grace has been we have paid off the mortgage - yet I see copious amounts of wealth in the country and ask myself why more of it can't move down through the economic strata.

    Yes, there are lots of people in work but we all know people are cheap compared to proper investment in technology and improvements in business processes.

    We then have Conservatives like May pretending to be sympathetic to the JAMMS or the squeezed middle or whatever it's being called this week but the standard Conservative response is just tax cuts.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    JackW said:

    Conservative Crackpot Coalition Of Chaos Update :

    CCCC Day 10 - 0745am

    Auchentennach Bugle News Quiz - All the Following Statement Are True Except One :

    1. Tens days on from election day the is still no C&S deal with the DUP
    2. The PM's approval rating is now greater than net minus 30
    3. The 2018 Queen's Speech is cancelled before the 2017 has been delivered.
    4. TSE's Grenfell donation of red shoes has been rejected as survivors are traumatized enough.
    5. The Daily Telegraph is now a Poundshop "Daily Express"
    6. Conservative K&C Council hand delivered dog fouling letters in Grenfell area on Thursday.
    7. SeanT had his greatest ever orgasm yesterday. (last thread)
    8. JackW will host a BBQ (whatever that is !!) today.

    ...................................................

    Sadly the correct answer is not the one about outdoor cremated meat, a swimming pool and bizarre "yoof" music .... :cry:


    It really puts into perspective what an achievement the 2010 Con-LD coalition deal was, when the whole thing was signed and sealed in 5 days, and after 10 days we are still none the wiser as to what's really in the Con-DUP supply & confidence deal, or whether it's really on.
  • Options
    PeterCPeterC Posts: 1,274
    stodge said:

    Good morning, everyone.

    Ironically, this is repeating the May mistake as far as perceptions go. She 'saw off' Boris and Gove, and Leadsom, all of whom imploded. There was no excellence (one could argue, and I did, it was masterly inactivity, the problem only arising when she actually tried to say or do anything and it turned out to be rubbish) of May, just weakness of her foes.

    Corbyn isn't seeing off PMs. They're ruining themselves by failing to judge or appeal to the public mood sufficiently.

    Cameron could've easily won the referendum had he not been so contemptuous towards the basket of deplorables (sorry, Little Englanders). May could've easily won the election by a landslide had she not decided that three weeks before polling days was the perfect time to scare the Conservative core vote shitless with an untested policy for the demented.

    Corbyn has improved, and that's something that should concern everyone who isn't far left. But the departure of Cameron, and future departure of May, is down to their failings, not Corbyn's excellence.

    Morning, Mr Dancer. I actually watched a little bit of the Grand Prix last weekend - really ?

    You are quite right - the current Conservative leader (and her predecessor) both completely misjudged and misread the public mood. Now, is that down to poor advice or poor political instincts ?

    I don't know yet we were being constantly told on here how popular May was and how she should call an election and how easily she'd win it and all that nonsense.

    Corbyn is, as Nick Palmer told us, completely what he seems. He's avuncular and easy going and reminds me of a modern Harold Wilson in that regard. I begin to wonder how much of the Conservative vote of 8/6 was really an anti-Corbyn vote and as he starts to look a more viable alternative, whether we will see Conservative numbers plunge further.
    There is no similarity to Harold Wilson. Corbyn has nothing of the intellectual depth necessary to be Prime Minister.
  • Options
    stodgestodge Posts: 12,841
    nichomar said:

    I do find the calm, mainly civilised debate of morning pb.com far more enlghtening than the wine and gin fuelled atmosphere of the later evening!

    Given many people in London and SE England probably had an uncomfortable night I'm surprised how civilised I'm feeling !!
  • Options
    DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    edited June 2017

    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Nothing like the Tory party for kicking someone when they're down.

    Oh I think the Socialist Workers can trump that - attacking her on the basis of an unknown body count from a fresh disaster.....
    That one passed me by??
    The SWP were prominent among the demonstrators outside number 10 claiming May had "blood on her hands" for the Grenfell disaster. The last time May was involved in housing was as a local councillor 30 years ago.....
    Whereas the new MP for Kensington was involved with housing very recently:

    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/politics/labours-new-kensington-mp-was-on-housing-scrutiny-committee-a3566661.html
    So what? For Conservatives, the charge is not that she was seen in west London with a box of matches but that Theresa May's response to the fire lacked empathy, urgency and just plain competence. The SWP muddying the waters is not the point. Sure, it is important to establish precisely what went wrong and why, but the central political point is that once again, here as in the election, the Prime Minister has completely misjudged the public mood and adopted the wrong tone.

    In the longer term, CCHQ's attempts to relieve the pressure on May by pointing to Labour figures is likely to founder against counter-charges of Conservatives cutting regulations and fire stations, regardless of whether or not there is a direct causal link. But for the immediate question of Mrs May's continued premiership, it is irrelevant anyway.

    And SWP involvement is probably overstated. Their SOP for demonstrations and marches has always been to provide more placards and banners than demonstrators, so that others without their own can carry them.
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,149
    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Still more likely than not. The voters may no longer want it by the time the negotiations are done but the Tory membership do, and so do the Labour leadership.
  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,949

    Mr. Quincel, cheers for that update, but mildly miffed as I backed her a smidgen more at 1.8 just yesterday.

    I wonder if she's not going to stand.

    Mr. W, Flavius Phocas also enjoyed substantial popularity immediately prior to his reign.

    I'm starting to wonder why she (nor anyone else for that matter) has announced they're standing. Starting to get nervous.

    If Mark Pack is anywhere near it's hers for the taking, however. I've just topped up at 2.4.
  • Options
    NigelbNigelb Posts: 62,492

    I smell toast.

    Party whips received information this weekend that some MPs have started to draft letters of no confidence against Mrs May.

    These will be sent to the party’s backbench 1922 Committee if her performance fails to improve before the first Commons votes on the Queen’s Speech in ten days’ time.

    A contest would be triggered if the committee receives 48 letters – 15 per cent of the parliamentary party – with Mr Johnson and Mr Davis already established as the clear frontrunners.

    And last night, The Mail on Sunday was told by one senior pro-Brexit MP that he would be ‘astounded’ if letters had not gone in already.

    He said plans were being hatched to present Mrs May with ‘an ultimatum’ that she had to go and be replaced if possible by a new leader, installed unopposed to avoid a divisive contest.

    The MP said: ‘The mood towards Theresa completely changed last week. We started thinking she could limp on for a few months. But her response to the Grenfell Tower tragedy has telescoped that into a matter of days or weeks.’

    He said Mr Johnson was probably most people’s preferred choice.

    Returning to their constituencies after being sworn in at Westminster, Tory MPs were taken aback at the scale of the anger of grassroots party activists over Mrs May’s performance last week.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-4614492/Wounded-knees-PM-faces-civil-war.html#ixzz4kJh7aSDh

    Johnson ?
    So the Tories are about to compound a blunder with an imbecility.

  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited June 2017
    If ever there was a story that encapsulated the mess the Tories and May in particular are in, it is the front page of the "Sunday Times" that states the PM has instructed the Conservative Kensington and Chelsea Council to hand over the Grenfell disaster relief operation to the Red Cross.

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/inadequate-council-ordered-home-as-red-cross-is-drafted-to-help-grenfell-tower-victims-s3720jx39
  • Options
    Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 60,976
    edited June 2017
    Mr. Quincel, indeed. I had thought they might have delayed because of the fire's saturation coverage, but it's been a few days. Maybe they're asking Farron to stay?

    Edited extra bit: just put a tiny sum on Swinson to slightly alter the balance of results.
  • Options
    nichomarnichomar Posts: 7,483
    stodge said:

    nichomar said:

    I do find the calm, mainly civilised debate of morning pb.com far more enlghtening than the wine and gin fuelled atmosphere of the later evening!

    Given many people in London and SE England probably had an uncomfortable night I'm surprised how civilised I'm feeling !!
    I think the temperature where i am dropped to 25 last night but you do actually become accustomed to it. It is the winter that can take you by suprise, it even snowed here for the first time in january. I'm a hundred metresoff the med on the costa blanca.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    GeoffM said:

    Scott_P said:


    Did they test "Do you know what Customs Union means?" before asking if we should leave it?

    The options defining what a Customs Union is are very leading and, in my opinion, incorrect.

    For example, 37% have picked the option 'paying a fee to access this customs union" to enable 'free trade' with the EU. This is then added to the 22% who don't want to Leave the EU at all to make up the 69%, once don't knows are removed.

    Firstly, that's not what a customs union is - you can have free trade without it, hence all the EFTA countries - and, secondly, it's asking for access, not full membership of it, and fails to make clear this would inhibit any ability of the UK to make its own trade deals.

    Interesting how it's only Remainer bitter-enders sharing this.
  • Options
    Casino_RoyaleCasino_Royale Posts: 55,302
    stodge said:

    nichomar said:

    I do find the calm, mainly civilised debate of morning pb.com far more enlghtening than the wine and gin fuelled atmosphere of the later evening!

    Given many people in London and SE England probably had an uncomfortable night I'm surprised how civilised I'm feeling !!
    Barely slept at all.
  • Options
    CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 59,608
    Dura_Ace said:

    Great idea. There'll be about 10,000 people who'll claim to have been living there.
    And others who might have arson cross their minds.....
  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,949
    edited June 2017

    Mr. Quincel, indeed. I had thought they might have delayed because of the fire's saturation coverage, but it's been a few days. Maybe they're asking Farron to stay?

    Edited extra bit: just put a tiny sum on Swinson to slightly alter the balance of results.

    According to the party president Farron will stay until 20 July, the timetable for replacing him will be announced in the upcoming week. I imagine there's furious behind the scenes politicing is going on, but formal announcements will wait until nominations open.

    (EDIT: Actually, I note Cable and Lamb have publicly flirted with running, but Swinson hasn't. She surely can't think she'll have a better chance later, or that she can rely on becoming leader later when the party is 'more worth running'?)
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,263
    Just watched another interview on Sky with a volunteer who says that no one is liasing with the families and she and another volunteer are cooking food for the families relocated to hotels. The obvious question is if they are in hotel accommodation are they not being feed by the hotel but the sky hosts doesn't even think of asking the question.

    Listened to an interview with a minister re TM meeting yesterday where she became very tearful and both she and a resident held hands in sadness for 20 minutes. The problem for TM is that she feels the pain every bit as much as others but finds it difficult to show empathy
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891

    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Still more likely than not. The voters may no longer want it by the time the negotiations are done but the Tory membership do, and so do the Labour leadership.
    The Labour leadership are doing what they believe is the correct thing to do after the referendum but none of the Labour leadership nor 95% of the parliamentary pary voted for it.
  • Options
    AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Northern Ireland is a lovely temperature this weekend. On the downside, at this time of year it barely gets dark.
  • Options
    OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 31,970
    edited June 2017
    Given the way the Tories shafted the LDs when in coalition with them, it's no wonder the DUP are taking their time over agreeing terms.

    Edit. Bloody predictive text!
  • Options
    RogerRoger Posts: 18,891
    JackW said:

    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Do we have an impeachment procedure in this country? Surely not or Cameron would already be on trial.

    BREXIT will happen, only the details are to be negotiated.

    Oh .... but those "details" !!
    If we continue to contribute over £5 billion a year and allow free movement will that constitute Brexit happening?
  • Options
    edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,149
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Still more likely than not. The voters may no longer want it by the time the negotiations are done but the Tory membership do, and so do the Labour leadership.
    The Labour leadership are doing what they believe is the correct thing to do after the referendum but none of the Labour leadership nor 95% of the parliamentary pary voted for it.
    Well, we don't know how Corbyn voted...
  • Options
    IanB2IanB2 Posts: 47,256
    edited June 2017
    Quincel said:

    Lib Dem Leadership Odds:

    Since diving to 1.5 on Betfair Jo Swinson has been drifting out for days, now 2.4 to back. Betway is the first bookie to follow suit, moving her to 2.25. Everyone else still around 1.5.

    *correction "diving to 1.25 on Betfair...."

    Edit/ you can still get 1.04 on Tim going between July and September, as he has said he will.
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469
    Quincel said:

    Mark Pack's survey (not poll) of LD members (which was very close last time, however):

    "Jo Swinson is the runaway favourite

    When asked to rate the 11 Liberal Democrat MPs other than Tim Farron in order of preference for party leader, 57% gave Jo Swinson their first preference.
    No other candidate got even as high as 15% of first preferences. On that showing, she would win in the first round in any contest. Even if her vote dipped below 50% in an actual contest, she draws second preferences widely from the supporters of all other MPs, and would still win with ease based on this survey.
    Because of her clear lead over all other candidates combined, it does not matter what combination of other candidates there really are when it comes to the actual election. She would win easily whatever the actual line up is.

    If Jo Swinson doesn't stand...

    Lamb slightly ahead of Cable - If Jo Swinson wins clearly whatever the combination of candidates, it's a very different picture if she doesn't stand. Rerunning the count with her votes transferred over to their second preferences gives a very close looking race with Norman Lamb fractionally ahead of Vince Cable with 30% to his 29%. Edward Davey is on 18% and the other MPs share the rest of the support, with Layla Moran the best of the rest on 8%.
    If all the other candidates are eliminated and votes transferred to Norman Lamb or Vince Cable, Norman Lamb extends his lead, just, to a 52% - 48% margin over Vince Cable.
    Note: It is possible these figures under-estimate Norman Lamb's actual support compared with Vince Cable as the responses slightly over-represent London members, where Vince Cable is stronger, and also the proportion recalling that they voted for Norman Lamb rather than Tim Farron in 2015 is on the low side (though that may be the usual effect of people's memories changing or fading to the detriment of the non-winner when recalling how they voted). The first factor, however, is, at most, not large and the second is unknown.
    Cable ahead of Davey - If Norman Lamb also does not stand, then Vince Cable wins out over Edward Davey 57%-43%."

    No chance for Tom Brake then?
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,263
    Roger said:

    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Still more likely than not. The voters may no longer want it by the time the negotiations are done but the Tory membership do, and so do the Labour leadership.
    The Labour leadership are doing what they believe is the correct thing to do after the referendum but none of the Labour leadership nor 95% of the parliamentary pary voted for it.
    For once Roger I believe it is becoming increasingly unlikely. Indeed it has the potential of tearing both conservatives and labour apart. The conservatives problems are well known but Corbyn's attempt to free himself of the EU so he can nationalize will not be supported by many in his party.
  • Options
    volcanopetevolcanopete Posts: 2,078
    PeterC said:

    stodge said:

    Good morning, everyone.

    Ironically, this is repeating the May mistake as far as perceptions go. She 'saw off' Boris and Gove, and Leadsom, all of whom imploded. There was no excellence (one could argue, and I did, it was masterly inactivity, the problem only arising when she actually tried to say or do anything and it turned out to be rubbish) of May, just weakness of her foes.

    Corbyn isn't seeing off PMs. They're ruining themselves by failing to judge or appeal to the public mood sufficiently.

    Cameron could've easily won the referendum had he not been so contemptuous towards the basket of deplorables (sorry, Little Englanders). May could've easily won the election by a landslide had she not decided that three weeks before polling days was the perfect time to scare the Conservative core vote shitless with an untested policy for the demented.

    Corbyn has improved, and that's something that should concern everyone who isn't far left. But the departure of Cameron, and future departure of May, is down to their failings, not Corbyn's excellence.

    Morning, Mr Dancer. I actually watched a little bit of the Grand Prix last weekend - really ?

    You are quite right - the current Conservative leader (and her predecessor) both completely misjudged and misread the public mood. Now, is that down to poor advice or poor political instincts ?

    I don't know yet we were being constantly told on here how popular May was and how she should call an election and how easily she'd win it and all that nonsense.

    Corbyn is, as Nick Palmer told us, completely what he seems. He's avuncular and easy going and reminds me of a modern Harold Wilson in that regard. I begin to wonder how much of the Conservative vote of 8/6 was really an anti-Corbyn vote and as he starts to look a more viable alternative, whether we will see Conservative numbers plunge further.
    There is no similarity to Harold Wilson. Corbyn has nothing of the intellectual depth necessary to be Prime Minister.
    What you actually mean is Mr Corbyn did not go to Eton and does not have a PPE from Cambridge.As Peter Oborne says,he has the made the correct judgement on foreign policy time after time and we would be much safer with Mr Corbyn as a result.We would also make massive savings as wars are very expensive and we have only just payed off the debt from the First World War,let alone Iraq.
  • Options
    felixfelix Posts: 15,124
    stodge said:

    Mr. Stodge, it was a very good race to watch.

    Corbyn is not what he seems. His mealy-mouthed claims on Trident ring hollow. He's a far left fool, backed up by a Marxist Shadow Chancellor.

    The point though is that for many people that's irrelevant. I look at my own circumstances and I have basically stood still since 2010 - the only saving grace has been we have paid off the mortgage - yet I see copious amounts of wealth in the country and ask myself why more of it can't move down through the economic strata.

    Yes, there are lots of people in work but we all know people are cheap compared to proper investment in technology and improvements in business processes.

    We then have Conservatives like May pretending to be sympathetic to the JAMMS or the squeezed middle or whatever it's being called this week but the standard Conservative response is just tax cuts.
    Presumably you have already returned to the Treasury all the gains you have made from the cuts in personal income tax allowances since 2010.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    It really puts into perspective what an achievement the 2010 Con-LD coalition deal was, when the whole thing was signed and sealed in 5 days, and after 10 days we are still none the wiser as to what's really in the Con-DUP supply & confidence deal, or whether it's really on.

    Indeed.

    Much credit goes to the Cameron and Clegg and their teams who worked as partners in a crisis situation and who were prepared to compromise in the national interest.

    Compare and contrast .... Hhhhmm ....

    Some wag has said that the Tories are having grave doubts about one part of the DUP manifesto demands - All Old Testament and fortnightly bin collections .....

    Apparently the Conservatives can't get past the rubbish .... :smiley:
  • Options
    BudGBudG Posts: 711
    edited June 2017

    Roger said:

    Anyone seriously think Brexit is going to happen?

    Still more likely than not. The voters may no longer want it by the time the negotiations are done but the Tory membership do, and so do the Labour leadership.
    Problem is, at the time of voting in the Referendum, people voted for Brexit content in the knowledge that it would be seen through by a Conservative government with a fairly comfortable working majority. Thanks to the FTPA they were entitled to think that this would be the case.

    By sidestepping the FTPA and gambling with her majority for Party political gain, despite May saying she respects the will of the people who voted in the referendum, she actually ignored the fact that people had voted for Leave in the knowledge that a Conservative government with a working majority would be there to see it through.

    If, a year ago, people had been told that Brexit would be negotiated by a Conservative minority government, propped up by the DUP, then the referendum result may well have been different.

    It's an unholy mess totally created by Theresa May in the hope of party political gain.
  • Options
    QuincelQuincel Posts: 3,949
    timmo said:

    Quincel said:

    Mark Pack's survey (not poll) of LD members (which was very close last time, however):

    "Jo Swinson is the runaway favourite

    When asked to rate the 11 Liberal Democrat MPs other than Tim Farron in order of preference for party leader, 57% gave Jo Swinson their first preference.
    No other candidate got even as high as 15% of first preferences. On that showing, she would win in the first round in any contest. Even if her vote dipped below 50% in an actual contest, she draws second preferences widely from the supporters of all other MPs, and would still win with ease based on this survey.
    Because of her clear lead over all other candidates combined, it does not matter what combination of other candidates there really are when it comes to the actual election. She would win easily whatever the actual line up is.

    If Jo Swinson doesn't stand...

    Lamb slightly ahead of Cable - If Jo Swinson wins clearly whatever the combination of candidates, it's a very different picture if she doesn't stand. Rerunning the count with her votes transferred over to their second preferences gives a very close looking race with Norman Lamb fractionally ahead of Vince Cable with 30% to his 29%. Edward Davey is on 18% and the other MPs share the rest of the support, with Layla Moran the best of the rest on 8%.
    If all the other candidates are eliminated and votes transferred to Norman Lamb or Vince Cable, Norman Lamb extends his lead, just, to a 52% - 48% margin over Vince Cable.
    Note: It is possible these figures under-estimate Norman Lamb's actual support compared with Vince Cable as the responses slightly over-represent London members, where Vince Cable is stronger, and also the proportion recalling that they voted for Norman Lamb rather than Tim Farron in 2015 is on the low side (though that may be the usual effect of people's memories changing or fading to the detriment of the non-winner when recalling how they voted). The first factor, however, is, at most, not large and the second is unknown.
    Cable ahead of Davey - If Norman Lamb also does not stand, then Vince Cable wins out over Edward Davey 57%-43%."

    No chance for Tom Brake then?
    His name isn't even mentioned in the results summary...

    (As it's not a poll, and not BPC in any case, no tables or results beyond Mark Pack's email.)
  • Options
    timmotimmo Posts: 1,469

    Just watched another interview on Sky with a volunteer who says that no one is liasing with the families and she and another volunteer are cooking food for the families relocated to hotels. The obvious question is if they are in hotel accommodation are they not being feed by the hotel but the sky hosts doesn't even think of asking the question.

    Listened to an interview with a minister re TM meeting yesterday where she became very tearful and both she and a resident held hands in sadness for 20 minutes. The problem for TM is that she feels the pain every bit as much as others but finds it difficult to show empathy

    Probably because if many are displaced Muslim families its Ramadan and tge hotels wont provide food that early or late
  • Options
    Scott_PScott_P Posts: 51,453
    https://twitter.com/peston/status/876197240913711104

    The promise of Brexit was steeped in ideology from the very beginning, a fairy tale based on dark chauvinism. The Spanish Armada, Napoleon, Hitler and now the Polish plumbers who allegedly push down wages -- when in reality they ensured that, after decades of lukewarmly dripping showers, the country's bathrooms gradually returned to functionality. Brexit was never a particularly good idea. Now, following the most recent election, Brexit is defunct. That, at least, is what a member of Theresa May's cabinet intimated last weekend. "In practical terms, Brexit is dead," an unnamed minister told the Financial Tim
    es.
  • Options
    JackWJackW Posts: 14,787

    Just watched another interview on Sky with a volunteer who says that no one is liasing with the families and she and another volunteer are cooking food for the families relocated to hotels. The obvious question is if they are in hotel accommodation are they not being feed by the hotel but the sky hosts doesn't even think of asking the question.

    Listened to an interview with a minister re TM meeting yesterday where she became very tearful and both she and a resident held hands in sadness for 20 minutes. The problem for TM is that she feels the pain every bit as much as others but finds it difficult to show empathy

    Perhaps the hotel has been book on a room only basis ?
  • Options
    Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 60,263
    timmo said:

    Just watched another interview on Sky with a volunteer who says that no one is liasing with the families and she and another volunteer are cooking food for the families relocated to hotels. The obvious question is if they are in hotel accommodation are they not being feed by the hotel but the sky hosts doesn't even think of asking the question.

    Listened to an interview with a minister re TM meeting yesterday where she became very tearful and both she and a resident held hands in sadness for 20 minutes. The problem for TM is that she feels the pain every bit as much as others but finds it difficult to show empathy

    Probably because if many are displaced Muslim families its Ramadan and tge hotels wont provide food that early or late
    Good point
This discussion has been closed.