politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The Deputy Speaker election is hard to call
Ladbrokes Deputy Speaker
11/8 Laing
3/1 Streeter
4/1 Bellingham
5/1 Burns
8/1 Binley
20/1 Amess
33/1 Dorries
pic.twitter.com/XvR30Ci4Zy
Comments
-
@UKELECTIONS2015: @Ladbrokes has put out a press release noting that the amount staked on Nadine Dorries (at nicely competitive odds of 33/1) is 50p.0
-
Paddy Power also has prices. The only better price they have is Burns.
Best prices:
Eleanor Laing 6/4
Henry Bellingham 3/1 Lad
Gary Streeter 7/2
Simon Burns 11/2 PP
Brian Binley 8/1 Lad
David Amess 20/1 Lad
Nadine Dorries 33/10 -
@BBCNewsnight: In 2012 David Davis said police version of plebgate would be torn to shreds in court. On Newsnight he reacts to new officers' honesty query.0
-
"As far as I can see,it is one person`s account against another ... "
except for all the evidence discrediting one account.
sorry. couldn't let that one slide. it's an amazing post.0 -
Yes, another person who really should never be allowed to sit on a jury.BannedInParis said:"As far as I can see,it is one person`s account against another ... "
except for all the evidence discrediting one account.
sorry. couldn't let that one slide. it's an amazing post.0 -
What odds one of these prospective deputies replaces Bercow in time I wonder. Hard enough to pick which one will win at this stage without adding that complication I suppose.0
-
Given the astonishingly daft bet you were offered on the previous thread, it is extremely hard to disagree.tim said:
With four or five exceptions the PB Tories are the thickest posters on the Internet.Stuart_Dickson said:Why is somebody offering Tim to lay CON MAJ at EVS when he could back CON MAJ at 3/1 with William Hill?
That is a sign of just how betting illiterate PB has become.0 -
That's an astonishingly stupid post. Given that one poster offered tim a bet at insane odds, all but 4 or 5 of the PB Tories are the thickest posters on the internet? You don't see a tiny problem with your logic?Stuart_Dickson said:
Given the astonishingly daft bet you were offered on the previous thread, it is extremely hard to disagree.tim said:
With four or five exceptions the PB Tories are the thickest posters on the Internet.Stuart_Dickson said:Why is somebody offering Tim to lay CON MAJ at EVS when he could back CON MAJ at 3/1 with William Hill?
That is a sign of just how betting illiterate PB has become.
0 -
Subsamples!JonnyJimmy said:
That's an astonishingly stupid post. Given that one poster offered tim a bet at insane odds, all but 4 or 5 of the PB Tories are the thickest posters on the internet? You don't see a tiny problem with your logic?0 -
Is the FA's estimate of the number of Polish fans that would go to Wembley as badly wrong as Labours in 2004?0
-
@DPJHodges: England's first job is to quieten this heavily partisan home crowd.isam said:Is the FA's estimate of the number of Polish fans that would go to Wembley as badly wrong as Labours in 2004?
0 -
The number of people who rise to obvious trolling would indicate that Tim has a point. Trolls live for the bite and people seem keen to provide it. Don't entertain trolls and they will stop.0
-
Has Ed M called for a judge led inquiry into Mitchell affaire?0
-
The lone PB Tory offering Tim insane odds on the previous thread is just a symptom of the festering illness that cripples the Tories on this forum. One almost feels sorry for the 4 or 5 that are not thick as mince.JonnyJimmy said:
That's an astonishingly stupid post. Given that one poster offered tim a bet at insane odds, all but 4 or 5 of the PB Tories are the thickest posters on the internet? You don't see a tiny problem with your logic?Stuart_Dickson said:
Given the astonishingly daft bet you were offered on the previous thread, it is extremely hard to disagree.tim said:
With four or five exceptions the PB Tories are the thickest posters on the Internet.Stuart_Dickson said:Why is somebody offering Tim to lay CON MAJ at EVS when he could back CON MAJ at 3/1 with William Hill?
That is a sign of just how betting illiterate PB has become.
Almost.
0 -
If Poland win tonight there is so much scope for clichés transcending immigration and football... and Ive started already!0
-
Not sure 1/4 and 14-1 were correct prices pre-match (Not on btw) ^^;0
-
I'm not on that either :P0
-
In Play Poland currently 10/1 (SJ)Pulpstar said:Not sure 1/4 and 14-1 were correct prices pre-match (Not on btw) ^^;
0 -
Stuart's a SNPer. Logic is not something he needs be familiar with.JonnyJimmy said:You don't see a tiny problem with your logic?
0 -
But I am on goal Goal Negredo ! £5 E/W Thanks Sam
0 -
I didn't know Nadine went to the bookies.Scott_P said:
@UKELECTIONS2015: @Ladbrokes has put out a press release noting that the amount staked on Nadine Dorries (at nicely competitive odds of 33/1) is 50p.
0 -
@TelePolitics: 'Plebgate' threatens the reputation of the police http://t.co/sUS5R2OYqn0
-
Gooooooooooooooal !
Snodgrass !0 -
Message to Real Madrid.
If Gareth is indeed crocked, it's £100m if you want Andros from us .... but his dream is to play for QPR again so tough, you've missed out on this one!0 -
I'm almost hoping the You Gov is back to 40 / 30-something just to enjoy the reds relief on here...0
-
Wellbeck is now being thrown in as a free with anyone buying Gomes from Spurs.0
-
Telegraph not amused:
'Betrayal of elderly on social care costs'
- Thousands could be forced to sell homes despite earlier Government assurances.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/10378848/Betrayal-of-elderly-on-social-care-costs.html0 -
Wellbeck is not QPR class.0
-
I sincerely hope that things are not as bad as they appear with the Plebgate story. Certainly there have been instances of police behaviour and coverups more despicable, sadly, but the implications of the story at present are genuinely sinister if proven correct, which is in a different category than most.Scott_P said:@TelePolitics: 'Plebgate' threatens the reputation of the police http://t.co/sUS5R2OYqn
0 -
England need some badgers to move the goalposts.0
-
Are even the bookies making fun of Nadine Dorries now? Harsh.old_labour said:I didn't know Nadine went to the bookies.
Scott_P said:@UKELECTIONS2015: @Ladbrokes has put out a press release noting that the amount staked on Nadine Dorries (at nicely competitive odds of 33/1) is 50p.
0 -
We're Approaching the Worst-Case Scenario for House GOP Hostage-Taking
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/10/unconscionable-irresponsibility-republican-house/70571/0 -
Come on Belgium.0
-
He is never wrong this man!
Dan Hodges@DPJHodges5m
Wellbeck is like Emile Heskey, but without the same keen eye for goal...0 -
-
@iainmartin1
Ray Winston there making gambling on football look quite exciting. Good adverts. Scotland to ever qualify for another world cup. 50-1.0 -
Given your assertion that everything Hodges says is instantly proved wrong, I presume you've taken those odds on such a sure thing?tim said:
Wellbeck next goalscorer 11/2Scrapheap_as_was said:He is never wrong this man!
Dan Hodges@DPJHodges5m
Wellbeck is like Emile Heskey, but without the same keen eye for goal...0 -
Chin chin old bean.Stuart_Dickson said:
0 -
0
-
Spoof account, thicko.Stuart_Dickson said:0 -
Personally I don't think he is always wrong, it's just that he is an obsessive dick, who has a one track mind, who gets re-produced on here incessantly.JonnyJimmy said:
Given your assertion that everything Hodges says is instantly proved wrong, I presume you've taken those odds on such a sure thing?tim said:
Wellbeck next goalscorer 11/2Scrapheap_as_was said:He is never wrong this man!
Dan Hodges@DPJHodges5m
Wellbeck is like Emile Heskey, but without the same keen eye for goal...0 -
Good evening, everyone.
The reports (read here) on the hustings make it sound like a fairly entertaining contest. Presumably it's a secret ballot?0 -
I don't think Hodges wants 'his' side to win.0
-
tim and Stuart, on this 'all but 4 or 5 PB Tories are the thickest on the Internet' thing, is one borderline or do you both have trouble counting quite so high?0
-
Poland fans singing "you only sing when your four up".....rather funny.0
-
Given Tim's "Osborne crying at a funeral will set the media narrative" stupidity, I wonder if he's classing himself as one of the aforementioned PBTories?JonnyJimmy said:tim and Stuart, on this 'all but 4 or 5 PB Tories are the thickest on the Internet' thing, is one borderline or do you both have trouble counting quite so high?
And I wish I could remember the name of the poster who said the other week that trains do not get traffic jams ...0 -
I personally doubt he genuinely has a one track mind - when he branches out a bit more, he can be reasonably insightful on occasion - but more that he has established his niche as a blogger and so cannot really divert from it too often without losing his audience. The problem of course is that eventually you hammer home your point too often and only the choir being preached to ends up appreciating it.RedRag1 said:
Personally I don't think he is always wrong, it's just that he is an obsessive dick, who has a one track mind, who gets re-produced on here incessantly.JonnyJimmy said:
Given your assertion that everything Hodges says is instantly proved wrong, I presume you've taken those odds on such a sure thing?tim said:
Wellbeck next goalscorer 11/2Scrapheap_as_was said:He is never wrong this man!
Dan Hodges@DPJHodges5m
Wellbeck is like Emile Heskey, but without the same keen eye for goal...
I compare it to the capable of being funny but too often execreble Mark Steel who was on HIGNFY again a few days ago. He really hates the right, no question, and clearly picked up an audience for that focus ahead of anything else, and now he seems to have forgotten that most left wing comics attempt to be actually funny even if they are blatantly partisan, and that hating the right is not in itself hilarious.
Hodges also I am sure believes what he writes, but has pandered to the crowd that want to hear his anti-Miliband message from a Labour voice message so much that it's become pretty much all he can now do and now damages any other legitimate points he might come up with.0 -
Poland fans singing "you only sing when your four up".....rather funny.
Whatever happened to
Poland boys we are here,
Sh*g your women and take your career....0 -
Re the Deputy Speaker race, on the assumption that Labour MPs will be the critical factor, what exactly are they looking for in a Deputy Speaker?
And how amusing to have the idea of MPs from one party essentially acting like canvassers and doorknockers for an MP from another party who they want to be Speaker/Deputy Speaker.0 -
If Miliband is not PM after the next election, can we expect 5 years of posts from the PB Kinnocks admitting he was right?kle4 said:
Hodges also I am sure believes what he writes, but has pandered to the crowd that want to hear his anti-Miliband message from a Labour voice message so much that it's become pretty much all he can now do and now damages any other legitimate points he might come up with.0 -
We could probably add all but 4 or 5 PB Tories being obsessively thin skinned about any criticism.JonnyJimmy said:tim and Stuart, on this 'all but 4 or 5 PB Tories are the thickest on the Internet' thing, is one borderline or do you both have trouble counting quite so high?
'How dare you use the vile epithet PB Tory' etc, etc
0 -
That would seem justified I guess. I've thought Labour would get back in since 2010 right after the election, so I will have a lot of humble pie to eat if Miliband is not PM in 2015, and I've already put on 2 stone this year and don't think I can handle that!Scott_P said:
If Miliband is not PM after the next election, can we expect 5 years of posts from the PB Kinnocks admitting he was right?kle4 said:
Hodges also I am sure believes what he writes, but has pandered to the crowd that want to hear his anti-Miliband message from a Labour voice message so much that it's become pretty much all he can now do and now damages any other legitimate points he might come up with.
Although even if he is right on that point, I would stand on the point that the repetition of a single opinion over and over obsessively, and the caricature of interpreting near everything as bad for one side over the other as almost a lone voice, does undermine other points that person would make, as by choice they are making no effort to be objective. It's why I find it so hard to look for valid points from polemicists, because their opinions clearly come first and then they find facts to support, rather than even looking for a pretense of doing otherwise. It does sometimes pay off, granted.
0 -
So you want to be in tim's gang too? Ok, noted...Theuniondivvie said:
We could probably add all but 4 or 5 PB Tories being obsessively thin skinned about any criticism.JonnyJimmy said:tim and Stuart, on this 'all but 4 or 5 PB Tories are the thickest on the Internet' thing, is one borderline or do you both have trouble counting quite so high?
'How dare you use the vile epithet PB Tory' etc, etc0 -
The problem for Hodges is, as he publically announced to his right wing readership, he is no longer a Labour man. He is no longer a "Blairite cuckoo in the Miliband nest" he is more like a Blairite cuckoo trying to jump in the Cameroon nest. Another problem for him is there are hundreds of bloggers out there who are not Labour men who slag off Labour on a daily basis and quite a few of them write for the dead tree press. He has lost his niche.kle4 said:
I personally doubt he genuinely has a one track mind - when he branches out a bit more, he can be reasonably insightful on occasion - but more that he has established his niche as a blogger and so cannot really divert from it too often without losing his audience. The problem of course is that eventually you hammer home your point too often and only the choir being preached to ends up appreciating it.RedRag1 said:
Personally I don't think he is always wrong, it's just that he is an obsessive dick, who has a one track mind, who gets re-produced on here incessantly.JonnyJimmy said:
Given your assertion that everything Hodges says is instantly proved wrong, I presume you've taken those odds on such a sure thing?tim said:
Wellbeck next goalscorer 11/2Scrapheap_as_was said:He is never wrong this man!
Dan Hodges@DPJHodges5m
Wellbeck is like Emile Heskey, but without the same keen eye for goal...
I compare it to the capable of being funny but too often execreble Mark Steel who was on HIGNFY again a few days ago. He really hates the right, no question, and clearly picked up an audience for that focus ahead of anything else, and now he seems to have forgotten that most left wing comics attempt to be actually funny even if they are blatantly partisan, and that hating the right is not in itself hilarious.
Hodges also I am sure believes what he writes, but has pandered to the crowd that want to hear his anti-Miliband message from a Labour voice message so much that it's become pretty much all he can now do and now damages any other legitimate points he might come up with.0 -
Noted? Lol!JonnyJimmy said:
So you want to be in tim's gang too? Ok, noted...Theuniondivvie said:
We could probably add all but 4 or 5 PB Tories being obsessively thin skinned about any criticism.JonnyJimmy said:tim and Stuart, on this 'all but 4 or 5 PB Tories are the thickest on the Internet' thing, is one borderline or do you both have trouble counting quite so high?
'How dare you use the vile epithet PB Tory' etc, etc
Don't tell him, Pike...
0 -
Sit down Wales.0
-
-
Should the off topic button be re named "off topic and I disagree?" for consistency?
Most posts are off topic I reckon, hence the oft used "On Topic"0 -
The off topic button is useless in this kind of forum, given that we only have one thread in which to natter away. The like button should be restored, as it highlights funny/interesting comments which may otherwise be missed (IMO).isam said:Should the off topic button be re named "off topic and I disagree?" for consistency?
Most posts are off topic I reckon, hence the oft used "On Topic"0 -
Wonder how much the bookies are losing on tonight's matches - All the favourites winning (& Scotland). Lots of ACCAs being landed I suspect.0
-
@racingkate: William Hill bet- World Cup: 10/3 Brazil, 9/2 Argentina, 9/2 Germany, 11/2 Spain, 14/1 Belgium, 16/1 Holland, 20/1 Colombia, 18/1 England!!0
-
0
-
I only mentioned it because you "off topic'd" me!RobD said:
The off topic button is useless in this kind of forum, given that we only have one thread in which to natter away. The like button should be restored, as it highlights funny/interesting comments which may otherwise be missed (IMO).isam said:Should the off topic button be re named "off topic and I disagree?" for consistency?
Most posts are off topic I reckon, hence the oft used "On Topic"
0 -
Ah crap, must be fat fingers on the iPhone. Let me un-flag you now ;-)isam said:
I only mentioned it because you "off topic'd" me!RobD said:
The off topic button is useless in this kind of forum, given that we only have one thread in which to natter away. The like button should be restored, as it highlights funny/interesting comments which may otherwise be missed (IMO).isam said:Should the off topic button be re named "off topic and I disagree?" for consistency?
Most posts are off topic I reckon, hence the oft used "On Topic"
0 -
Found it. Had to go to your profile to figure out which post it was, something massively off topic about football ;-)
Sorry about that0 -
Ha, double entendres-ville from BBC commentary.
'Aaron Ramsey runs on to a cute ass from Craig Bellamy to stab in through the keeper's legs.'0 -
Back Belgium for the Euros in 2016, they have an unbelievable array of young talent.Scott_P said:@racingkate: William Hill bet- World Cup: 10/3 Brazil, 9/2 Argentina, 9/2 Germany, 11/2 Spain, 14/1 Belgium, 16/1 Holland, 20/1 Colombia, 18/1 England!!
0 -
Mr. Divvie, that's a bit overt!
A year or two ago the F1 commentators did mention once or twice that Glock had slipped inside the Virgin.0 -
Cheers!RobD said:
Ah crap, must be fat fingers on the iPhone. Let me un-flag you now ;-)isam said:
I only mentioned it because you "off topic'd" me!RobD said:
The off topic button is useless in this kind of forum, given that we only have one thread in which to natter away. The like button should be restored, as it highlights funny/interesting comments which may otherwise be missed (IMO).isam said:Should the off topic button be re named "off topic and I disagree?" for consistency?
Most posts are off topic I reckon, hence the oft used "On Topic"
0 -
Wot No Ma Beckett ?!?
Titters ....0 -
Wales have just helped... suspect it's actually been pretty decent for them:Pulpstar said:Wonder how much the bookies are losing on tonight's matches - All the favourites winning (& Scotland). Lots of ACCAs being landed I suspect.
Belgium 1 - 1 Wales
Italy 2 - 2 Armenia
Azerbaijan 1 - 1 Russia
Israel 1 - 1 N.Ireland
Montenegro 2 - 5 Moldova
0 -
I put the Raceclear donkeys in with my other ones today too. Had an absolutely stonking afternoon of it!isam said:
0 -
To be honest that is where I expected it to end up on October 1st. The thing to remember here is that while the Tea Party are many things, they aren't rational and they don't care about the rest of the republican party.Stuart_Dickson said:We're Approaching the Worst-Case Scenario for House GOP Hostage-Taking
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/10/unconscionable-irresponsibility-republican-house/70571/
What I don't get is how can they leaving Washington works without making them look 100% responsible. Then again when does anything the tea party does make sense over the pond.0 -
The Belgian hype is already priced in well beyond reality.nigel4england said:
Back Belgium for the Euros in 2016, they have an unbelievable array of young talent.Scott_P said:@racingkate: William Hill bet- World Cup: 10/3 Brazil, 9/2 Argentina, 9/2 Germany, 11/2 Spain, 14/1 Belgium, 16/1 Holland, 20/1 Colombia, 18/1 England!!
0 -
They believe what they are doing is right for America.eek said:
To be honest that is where I expected it to end up on October 1st. The thing to remember here is that while the Tea Party are many things, they aren't rational and they don't care about the rest of the republican party.Stuart_Dickson said:We're Approaching the Worst-Case Scenario for House GOP Hostage-Taking
http://www.theatlanticwire.com/politics/2013/10/unconscionable-irresponsibility-republican-house/70571/
What I don't get is how can they leaving Washington works without making them look 100% responsible. Then again when does anything the tea party does make sense over the pond.
How many economists told Thatcher she was wrong?
0 -
http://politicalscrapbook.net/2013/10/british-citizens-sent-threatening-get-out-texts-by-home-office/
The UK Border Agency has sent what is thought to be hundreds of intimidating text messages to British Citizens threatening them with deportation. The has come to light after a British man of a South Asian background was sent a message ”from the UK Border Agency” which told him:
“You are required to leave the UK as you no longer have right to remain.”
Unfortunately for Theresa May’s Home Office — who run the Border Agency — and their contractor Capita, this morning’s Guardian diary reports that the message in question was sent to Suresh Grover, who founded an anti-racism charity. The messages are apparently intended for foreign nationals such as over-stayers, but with at least 200 formal complaints over the texts, the number of messages sent in error to British Citizens is thought to be much higher.0 -
eek The GOP is presently being held hostage by its own militant tendency, the Tea Party, and is as unelectable as Labour was in the eighties (although unlike Labour the fact the US has mid-terms does give it some power in one of the 3 sections of elected government). I expect Hillary to win in 2016 and be re-elected in 2020 meaning the GOP will be out of office for a generation until 2024!
Also, just come back from an excellent one man play on Churchill's time on the run in South Africa!0 -
I took 12/1 ages ago, really happy with thatmaaarsh said:
The Belgian hype is already priced in well beyond reality.nigel4england said:
Back Belgium for the Euros in 2016, they have an unbelievable array of young talent.Scott_P said:@racingkate: William Hill bet- World Cup: 10/3 Brazil, 9/2 Argentina, 9/2 Germany, 11/2 Spain, 14/1 Belgium, 16/1 Holland, 20/1 Colombia, 18/1 England!!
0 -
If it had not been posted yet..here's who nominated who in the Deputy Speaker race
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/speaker/Election-of-Deputy-Speaker-16-October-2013-list-of-candidates-and-their-sponsors.pdf
Amess: Bob Russell, Peter Lilley, Andrew Tyre, Roger Godsiff, Angela Watkinson, Tom Harris. Mike Weir, Linda Riordan, Mark Williams, Ed Leigh
Bellingham: David Ruffley, Malcolm Rifkind, Nigel Adams, Chloe Smith, Pauline Latham, Penny Mourdant, Ian Lucas, Russell Brown, Gordon Birtwistle, Zac Goldsmith
Binley: Mike Penning, Mike Hancock, Peter Bone, John Hayes, Jim Dobbin, Katy Clark, Jeffrey Donaldson, Mark Menzies, Rebecca Harris, Adrian Bailey
Burns: John Randall, Peter Bottomley, Karen Lumley, Julian Sturdy, Jackie Doyle Price, Keith Simpson, Therese Coffrey, Nick De Bois, Robert Buckland, Caroline Nokes
Nadine: Chris Kelly, Stewart Jackson, Rosie Cooper, Sian James, Anne Main, Stephen McPartland
Laing: Richard Ottaway, Bernard Jenkin, Kevin Barron, Kevin Doran, Andrea Leasom, Jacob Rees Mogg, Sylvia Harmon, Malcolm Bruce, Graham Allen, Tessa Jowell
Streeter: Gerald Kaufman, Alistir Burt, Meg Munn, Priti Patel, Tim Farron, Mark Field, Paul Goggins, John Glen, Alison Seaback, Sarah Wollaston0 -
Burns doesn't have an Lab-LD MP in his nominations list.
Nadine only submitted the exact minium required.0 -
BBC America has been relentlessly and tediously promoting something called 'Torchwood' for the last few weeks, (even more - if that's possible - than it promotes the Graham Norton Show), so I have dvred several episodes.
It seems somewhat off beat, as they appear to operate from under a building shaped like a large Hovis loaf amidst a 60s style concrete brutal area apparently in Cardiff.
They keep mentioning 'Unit', and referring to 'the doctor', so my question is does this have any connection with Dr. Who, and if so what? I haven't seen Dr Who since Tom Baker, Jon Pertwee days, but I remember the brigadier and Unit. The new Doctor is even in it.0 -
The number of sponsors for each candidate...AndreaParma_82 said:If it had not been posted yet..here's who nominated who in the Deputy Speaker race
http://www.parliament.uk/documents/speaker/Election-of-Deputy-Speaker-16-October-2013-list-of-candidates-and-their-sponsors.pdf
Amess: 10
Bellingham: 10
Binley: 10
Burns: 10
Nadine: 6
Laing: 10
Streeter: 10
0 -
Tom Newton Dunn @tnewtondunn 1m
Sun/YouGov poll tonight: Labour lead back to 5 points. LAB 39%, CON 34%, UKIP 11%, LD 9%.0 -
But we all know that TNS-BMRB are the new gold standard, ahem0
-
It's a spin-off from Doctor Who in the sense that the main character, Captain Jack (played by John Barrowman) featured in several episodes of the 2005 series of Doctor Who before moving over to Torchwood - but the plan always was that he'd have his own show and he was only ever written into Doctor Who with this in mind to begin with...Tim_B said:
They keep mentioning 'Unit', and referring to 'the doctor', so my question is does this have any connection with Dr. Who, and if so what? I haven't seen Dr Who since Tom Baker, Jon Pertwee days, but I remember the brigadier and Unit. The new Doctor is even in it.
Of course Torchwood is also an anagram...
0 -
The front page of the Sun is disturbing, I'm now imagining Wayne Rooney with a Brazilian.
Nick Sutton @suttonnick 1m
Like the Sun's asterisk on Brazilian headline - "It's a close shave but we wax Poles" #tomorrowspaperstoday #EngvPol
pic.twitter.com/C8yYqQjvsp0 -
Good evening, my fellow PB Plebs!0
-
Hello Comrade PlebSunil_Prasannan said:Good evening, my fellow PB Plebs!
0 -
AndreaParma_82 said:
If it had not been posted yet..here's who nominated who in the Deputy Speaker race...
Thanks Andrea. Clear edge by Laing and Streeter there in terms of heavyweight mainstream support. I'd think the Labour vote will go heavily to those two. When is the vote?
0 -
tim seeks relief from a 5 pointer.tim said:@tnewtondunn: Sun/YouGov poll tonight: Labour lead back to 5 points. LAB 39%, CON 34%, UKIP 11%, LD 9%.
Looks like they found a normal sample
There's a battle outside
And it is ragin'
It'll soon shake your windows
And rattle your walls
For the times they are a-changin'.
0
Suarez is next up. 
