politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Time for the PB Nighthawks Cafe – the place for late night political conversation
For me th big US development has been the growing opposition from senior figures in the military to Trump’s approach to dealing with the demos following the police murder on an unarmed black man in Minnesota.
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
Even under the tariff plan chicken and beef imported from the USA will still be cheaper than that produced in the UK.
Amazing how quickly the UK folded . Time to order the gimp suit !
So we're going to get cheaper food is what you're saying?
Good. That's what the Kiwis did - abolish tariffs, abolish subsidies, told their farmers to make do without any of that. And they're still exporters.
The food will be cheaper because it will not meet current animal care standards. UK farmers will clearly have to have the standards they work to lowered as well if they are to compete. My guess is that this will not be popular even if it does lower prices a little. We shall see. Luckily - like the people inflicting this on us - I will still be able to buy the good stuff for my family.
Or UK farmers will maintain current standards and consumers can make the choice to buy Red Tractor approved products. Just like we already can do.
I buy Free Range eggs and Red Tractor food even though cheaper caged eggs and cheaper lower standard food is available. People can make a free choice in a free society.
You won’t be able to make that choice because the US will insist that food cannot be labelled so as to allow consumers to know where their meat, for instance, comes from.
I am finding this argument very amusing because clearly no one has actually gone and looked at US law.
Under the "Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002" almost all fresh produce - including chicken - must carry a Mandatory Country of Origin label. This has been reaffirmed by several amendments to the acts - the most recent in 2016.
The really funny bit is that it was Canada who took the US to the WTO to claim that the mCOOL laws were counter to free trade and should be outlawed. The Canadians won as far as Beef and Pork are concerned but the list of foodstuffs that have to carry the mCOOL under US Federal law currently includes fresh fruits, raw vegetables, fish, shellfish, muscle cuts and ground lamb, chicken, goat, peanuts, pecans, ginseng, and macadamia nuts.
So no, the US will not be insisting that there cannot be Country of Origin labels. In fact their own laws make it mandatory.
On Parliament. The PM lent his support to shielded MOs being able to vote remotely. He did not support returning to the hybrid Parliament, which (a) the Speaker certainly supports, and (b) the YouGov survey may have been taken to be about. For the time being, the vast majority of MPs should be able to work from home -- as has been show to be possible and workable.
There should have been no rush to halfway house operations when workable contingency operations were already in place.
The chief executive of the Premier League has revealed that calls by the fiancee of Jamal Khashoggi for it to stop the planned Saudi Arabia-backed takeover of Newcastle United “are being fully considered”.
In a letter seen by Telegraph Sport, Richard Masters told Hatice Cengiz’s lawyer he was “extremely sympathetic to your client’s position” after Rodney Dixon QC twice wrote to him on her behalf urging him to block the proposed £300 million deal.
It is the first time the Premier League has acknowledged it is examining allegations of murder and human rights abuses as part of the owners’ and directors’ test being conducted over the Newcastle takeover. Masters did, however, refuse to meet Cengiz after Dixon had requested he do so “as soon as possible”.
I see on the BBC the president of Brazil is quoted as saying 'death was the destiny of everyone'. Who says politicians don't know how to calm a situation with their words. I mean, it is true, but boy that's a direct statement.
' Maybe but as has been said do not underestimate Boris ability to win over normal voters
Boris has lost me, but I think many on here see Starmer as a messiah and he is far from that, though he is a huge relief from the toxic days of Corbyn'
The fact that he has lost you as a Tory loyalist must make it highly likely that many other less Tory-inclined voters will have seen the scales fall from their eyes.I suspect that many of the firsttime Tory voters from last December already feel pretty disillusioned with Johnson - and the factors which attracted them to him - Brexit and Corbyn - have ceased to be relevant. The poll leads we were seeing two months ago were always artificial and were never going to last. The vote shares we are now being presented with are much more realistic with some return to normal politics having been accelerated by recent perceptions of Government mismanagement. On the basis of earlier Parliaments,however, there must be a strong possibility - particularly given the economic storms which lie ahead - that the polls are continuing to flatter the Tories relative to their likely performance in 2024. When we look back to other big election victories from 2001 - 1997 - 1987 - 1966 - and 1959, the ruling party was doing a fair bit better six months into those Parliaments than it was able to sustain at the subsequent General Election several years later
Even under the tariff plan chicken and beef imported from the USA will still be cheaper than that produced in the UK.
Amazing how quickly the UK folded . Time to order the gimp suit !
So we're going to get cheaper food is what you're saying?
Good. That's what the Kiwis did - abolish tariffs, abolish subsidies, told their farmers to make do without any of that. And they're still exporters.
The food will be cheaper because it will not meet current animal care standards. UK farmers will clearly have to have the standards they work to lowered as well if they are to compete. My guess is that this will not be popular even if it does lower prices a little. We shall see. Luckily - like the people inflicting this on us - I will still be able to buy the good stuff for my family.
Or UK farmers will maintain current standards and consumers can make the choice to buy Red Tractor approved products. Just like we already can do.
I buy Free Range eggs and Red Tractor food even though cheaper caged eggs and cheaper lower standard food is available. People can make a free choice in a free society.
You won’t be able to make that choice because the US will insist that food cannot be labelled so as to allow consumers to know where their meat, for instance, comes from.
I am finding this argument very amusing because clearly no one has actually gone and looked at US law.
Under the "Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002" almost all fresh produce - including chicken - must carry a Mandatory Country of Origin label. This has been reaffirmed by several amendments to the acts - the most recent in 2016.
The really funny bit is that it was Canada who took the US to the WTO to claim that the mCOOL laws were counter to free trade and should be outlawed. The Canadians won as far as Beef and Pork are concerned but the list of foodstuffs that have to carry the mCOOL under US Federal law currently includes fresh fruits, raw vegetables, fish, shellfish, muscle cuts and ground lamb, chicken, goat, peanuts, pecans, ginseng, and macadamia nuts.
So no, the US will not be insisting that there cannot be Country of Origin labels. In fact their own laws make it mandatory.
FPT: In the UNITED STATES. Not overseas.
There is a principle of reciprocation in FTAs. If the US have COOL laws then any country with an FTA with them can have the same.
I can't see this as anything particularly new. I can remember heated SU debates between the free-speech brigade and the do-not-offend brigade thirty years ago. The latter faction were generally more victorious in terms of motions carried etc.
The chief executive of the Premier League has revealed that calls by the fiancee of Jamal Khashoggi for it to stop the planned Saudi Arabia-backed takeover of Newcastle United “are being fully considered”.
In a letter seen by Telegraph Sport, Richard Masters told Hatice Cengiz’s lawyer he was “extremely sympathetic to your client’s position” after Rodney Dixon QC twice wrote to him on her behalf urging him to block the proposed £300 million deal.
It is the first time the Premier League has acknowledged it is examining allegations of murder and human rights abuses as part of the owners’ and directors’ test being conducted over the Newcastle takeover. Masters did, however, refuse to meet Cengiz after Dixon had requested he do so “as soon as possible”.
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Entirely appropos of nothing, but do footballers in Spain have an addition to fiddling their tax arrangements, or are the authorities there the only ones in Europe who care about footballers fiddling their tax arrangements? It seems to come up a lot.
Atletico Madrid forward Diego Costa has avoided a six-month prison term - but will have to pay a fine of €543,208 (£485,324) for tax fraud.
I can't see this as anything particularly new. I can remember heated SU debates between the free-speech brigade and the do-not-offend brigade thirty years ago. The latter faction were generally more victorious in terms of motions carried etc.
They published an op-ed by a guy advocating the use of lethal military force against protesters. This isn’t a woke/liberal thing. I’m a 40 something liberal and they should not have published it. No one who considers themselves a liberal should have published it. Editorial standards are not the same thing as censorship.
I can't see this as anything particularly new. I can remember heated SU debates between the free-speech brigade and the do-not-offend brigade thirty years ago. The latter faction were generally more victorious in terms of motions carried etc.
I remember Enoch Powell being no platformed at ULU nearly 40 years ago.
' Maybe but as has been said do not underestimate Boris ability to win over normal voters
Boris has lost me, but I think many on here see Starmer as a messiah and he is far from that, though he is a huge relief from the toxic days of Corbyn'
The fact that he has lost you as a Tory loyalist must make it highly likely that many other less Tory-inclined voters will have seen the scales fall from their eyes.I suspect that many of the firsttime Tory voters from last December already feel pretty disillusioned with Johnson - and the factors which attracted them to him - Brexit and Corbyn - have ceased to be relevant. The poll leads we were seeing two months ago were always artificial and were never going to last. The vote shares we are now being presented with are much more realistic with some return to normal politics having been accelerated by recent perceptions of Government mismanagement. On the basis of earlier Parliaments,however, there must be a strong possibility - particularly given the economic storms which lie ahead - that the polls are continuing to flatter the Tories relative to their likely performance in 2024. When we look back to other big election victories from 2001 - 1997 - 1987 - 1966 - and 1959, the ruling party was doing a fair bit better six months into those Parliaments than it was able to sustain at the subsequent General Election several years later
Do not take my statement as some idea I will not vote conservative.
I am a member and will remain so and will vote conservative
Even under the tariff plan chicken and beef imported from the USA will still be cheaper than that produced in the UK.
Amazing how quickly the UK folded . Time to order the gimp suit !
So we're going to get cheaper food is what you're saying?
Good. That's what the Kiwis did - abolish tariffs, abolish subsidies, told their farmers to make do without any of that. And they're still exporters.
The food will be cheaper because it will not meet current animal care standards. UK farmers will clearly have to have the standards they work to lowered as well if they are to compete. My guess is that this will not be popular even if it does lower prices a little. We shall see. Luckily - like the people inflicting this on us - I will still be able to buy the good stuff for my family.
Or UK farmers will maintain current standards and consumers can make the choice to buy Red Tractor approved products. Just like we already can do.
I buy Free Range eggs and Red Tractor food even though cheaper caged eggs and cheaper lower standard food is available. People can make a free choice in a free society.
You won’t be able to make that choice because the US will insist that food cannot be labelled so as to allow consumers to know where their meat, for instance, comes from.
I am finding this argument very amusing because clearly no one has actually gone and looked at US law.
Under the "Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002" almost all fresh produce - including chicken - must carry a Mandatory Country of Origin label. This has been reaffirmed by several amendments to the acts - the most recent in 2016.
The really funny bit is that it was Canada who took the US to the WTO to claim that the mCOOL laws were counter to free trade and should be outlawed. The Canadians won as far as Beef and Pork are concerned but the list of foodstuffs that have to carry the mCOOL under US Federal law currently includes fresh fruits, raw vegetables, fish, shellfish, muscle cuts and ground lamb, chicken, goat, peanuts, pecans, ginseng, and macadamia nuts.
So no, the US will not be insisting that there cannot be Country of Origin labels. In fact their own laws make it mandatory.
FPT: In the UNITED STATES. Not overseas.
There is a principle of reciprocation in FTAs. If the US have COOL laws then any country with an FTA with them can have the same.
There’s traditionally a principle of reciprocity in extradition treaties too but the UK–US extradition treaty of 2003, implemented by the UK by the Extradition Act 2003, is anything but even handed. It allows the extradition of UK nationals who have committed a breach of US law in the UK - but there is no reciprocal right. I am not convinced that the inequality of bargaining power that led to that outcome in an extradition treaty will not be repeated in any FTA leading to similar asymmetries.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
So true, and Johnson will get the blame from the same people who exonerated Brown in 2008.
What Johnson has dreamt of all his life will turn out to be worse than he could have possibly imagined. I'm with others who think he'll jack it in by the end of the year
I wonder if the NYT realise quite how much they've trashed their international brand with this latest "shoot the protestors" malarkey.
I've seen a few (British) acquaintances, who'd subscribed to it for the quality of their journalism, unsubscribe today. I'd usually dismiss it as Twitter posturing but it seems legit - not least because they all go on to complain about how hard it is to actually get the NYT to cancel a subscription.
There’s traditionally a principle of reciprocity in extradition treaties too but the UK–US extradition treaty of 2003, implemented by the UK by the Extradition Act 2003, is anything but even handed. It allows the extradition of UK nationals who have committed a breach of US law in the UK - but there is no reciprocal right. I am not convinced that the inequality of bargaining power that led to that outcome in an extradition treaty will not be repeated in any FTA leading to similar asymmetries.
Nonetheless the Guardian-reading classes keep repeating, as though it were 100% guaranteed truth, that the USA wants to ban us having labels showing country of origin, as part of any trade deal.
Well, maybe they do. Let's see the evidence. Citation needed, as the saying goes.
(And please let's not repost the completely bonkers Jon Stone tweet from earlier today, in which he demolished his own argument by referencing a US text which showed nothing of the sort).
I see on the BBC the president of Brazil is quoted as saying 'death was the destiny of everyone'. Who says politicians don't know how to calm a situation with their words. I mean, it is true, but boy that's a direct statement.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
Even under the tariff plan chicken and beef imported from the USA will still be cheaper than that produced in the UK.
Amazing how quickly the UK folded . Time to order the gimp suit !
So we're going to get cheaper food is what you're saying?
Good. That's what the Kiwis did - abolish tariffs, abolish subsidies, told their farmers to make do without any of that. And they're still exporters.
The food will be cheaper because it will not meet current animal care standards. UK farmers will clearly have to have the standards they work to lowered as well if they are to compete. My guess is that this will not be popular even if it does lower prices a little. We shall see. Luckily - like the people inflicting this on us - I will still be able to buy the good stuff for my family.
Or UK farmers will maintain current standards and consumers can make the choice to buy Red Tractor approved products. Just like we already can do.
I buy Free Range eggs and Red Tractor food even though cheaper caged eggs and cheaper lower standard food is available. People can make a free choice in a free society.
You won’t be able to make that choice because the US will insist that food cannot be labelled so as to allow consumers to know where their meat, for instance, comes from.
I am finding this argument very amusing because clearly no one has actually gone and looked at US law.
Under the "Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002" almost all fresh produce - including chicken - must carry a Mandatory Country of Origin label. This has been reaffirmed by several amendments to the acts - the most recent in 2016.
The really funny bit is that it was Canada who took the US to the WTO to claim that the mCOOL laws were counter to free trade and should be outlawed. The Canadians won as far as Beef and Pork are concerned but the list of foodstuffs that have to carry the mCOOL under US Federal law currently includes fresh fruits, raw vegetables, fish, shellfish, muscle cuts and ground lamb, chicken, goat, peanuts, pecans, ginseng, and macadamia nuts.
So no, the US will not be insisting that there cannot be Country of Origin labels. In fact their own laws make it mandatory.
FPT: In the UNITED STATES. Not overseas.
Trade agreements apply to both parties. Country of Origin is something the US wants on labels, not something it wants removing.
Even under the tariff plan chicken and beef imported from the USA will still be cheaper than that produced in the UK.
Amazing how quickly the UK folded . Time to order the gimp suit !
So we're going to get cheaper food is what you're saying?
Good. That's what the Kiwis did - abolish tariffs, abolish subsidies, told their farmers to make do without any of that. And they're still exporters.
The food will be cheaper because it will not meet current animal care standards. UK farmers will clearly have to have the standards they work to lowered as well if they are to compete. My guess is that this will not be popular even if it does lower prices a little. We shall see. Luckily - like the people inflicting this on us - I will still be able to buy the good stuff for my family.
Or UK farmers will maintain current standards and consumers can make the choice to buy Red Tractor approved products. Just like we already can do.
I buy Free Range eggs and Red Tractor food even though cheaper caged eggs and cheaper lower standard food is available. People can make a free choice in a free society.
You won’t be able to make that choice because the US will insist that food cannot be labelled so as to allow consumers to know where their meat, for instance, comes from.
I am finding this argument very amusing because clearly no one has actually gone and looked at US law.
Under the "Farm Security and Rural Investment Act of 2002" almost all fresh produce - including chicken - must carry a Mandatory Country of Origin label. This has been reaffirmed by several amendments to the acts - the most recent in 2016.
The really funny bit is that it was Canada who took the US to the WTO to claim that the mCOOL laws were counter to free trade and should be outlawed. The Canadians won as far as Beef and Pork are concerned but the list of foodstuffs that have to carry the mCOOL under US Federal law currently includes fresh fruits, raw vegetables, fish, shellfish, muscle cuts and ground lamb, chicken, goat, peanuts, pecans, ginseng, and macadamia nuts.
So no, the US will not be insisting that there cannot be Country of Origin labels. In fact their own laws make it mandatory.
FPT: In the UNITED STATES. Not overseas.
There is a principle of reciprocation in FTAs. If the US have COOL laws then any country with an FTA with them can have the same.
There’s traditionally a principle of reciprocity in extradition treaties too but the UK–US extradition treaty of 2003, implemented by the UK by the Extradition Act 2003, is anything but even handed. It allows the extradition of UK nationals who have committed a breach of US law in the UK - but there is no reciprocal right. I am not convinced that the inequality of bargaining power that led to that outcome in an extradition treaty will not be repeated in any FTA leading to similar asymmetries.
Well given that the US would have to argue that their own law is a barrier to free trade in order to stop the UK having COO labelling I look forward to that one being argued in which ever court is deciding the case.
So yes I am convinced that COO labelling is allowed. Because the US wants it.
I wonder if the NYT realise quite how much they've trashed their international brand with this latest "shoot the protestors" malarkey.
I've seen a few (British) acquaintances, who'd subscribed to it for the quality of their journalism, unsubscribe today. I'd usually dismiss it as Twitter posturing but it seems legit - not least because they all go on to complain about how hard it is to actually get the NYT to cancel a subscription.
I subbed up briefly when it was free as they had quick US polls when the Dem race was live.Unsubscribing is a bit of a faff.
incidentally, in my Trust 10% of tested staff are coming back antibody positive. I don't think all 5000 have yet been processed, but that fits with the 7% rate in the national sample. We are maybe 1/6th of the way to herd immunity.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
I see on the BBC the president of Brazil is quoted as saying 'death was the destiny of everyone'. Who says politicians don't know how to calm a situation with their words. I mean, it is true, but boy that's a direct statement.
Is he a failed actuary? But the translation is too strict. A better rendering in English is "Everyone must eventually die". Of course it's true but so are many statements and he should try saying it after earthquakes, or car crashes. Bolsonaro, who has advocated sterilisation of the poor to fight crime, surpasses Trump as a polariser and Vladimir Zhirinovsky as an épateur.
incidentally, in my Trust 10% of tested staff are coming back antibody positive. I don't think all 5000 have yet been processed, but that fits with the 7% rate in the national sample. We are maybe 1/6th of the way to herd immunity.
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
incidentally, in my Trust 10% of tested staff are coming back antibody positive. I don't think all 5000 have yet been processed, but that fits with the 7% rate in the national sample. We are maybe 1/6th of the way to herd immunity.
incidentally, in my Trust 10% of tested staff are coming back antibody positive. I don't think all 5000 have yet been processed, but that fits with the 7% rate in the national sample. We are maybe 1/6th of the way to herd immunity.
Another colleague of mine down badly with it today. I shared a room with her last week.
Does 10% of and NHS Trust's staff being antibody positive really equate to 7% overall? I'd have thought NHS Trust staff were much more at risk of exposure than the general population.
I have lost tack of the situation with antibody tests - are these now widely available?
I can't see this as anything particularly new. I can remember heated SU debates between the free-speech brigade and the do-not-offend brigade thirty years ago. The latter faction were generally more victorious in terms of motions carried etc.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Let's be honest, the protestors yesterday were the same ones up in arms about Cummings. They proved they don't care about covid they were just point scoring.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
I thought it was very telling that when raising significant racist police incident in the UK, the example brought out yesterday was Stephen Lawrence, which was 27 years ago. The US don't seem to be able to go 27 days without something.
Orders of magnitude difference in issues between the two countries.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
That's like excusing driving after six pints because someone else parked on a yellow line.
I wonder if the NYT realise quite how much they've trashed their international brand with this latest "shoot the protestors" malarkey.
I've seen a few (British) acquaintances, who'd subscribed to it for the quality of their journalism, unsubscribe today. I'd usually dismiss it as Twitter posturing but it seems legit - not least because they all go on to complain about how hard it is to actually get the NYT to cancel a subscription.
I can't see anything a out shooting protestors and he draws (quite rightly) comparisons with how troops were used to quell violence from whites opposing desegregation in the 1960s.
incidentally, in my Trust 10% of tested staff are coming back antibody positive. I don't think all 5000 have yet been processed, but that fits with the 7% rate in the national sample. We are maybe 1/6th of the way to herd immunity.
Another colleague of mine down badly with it today. I shared a room with her last week.
Does 10% of and NHS Trust's staff being antibody positive really equate to 7% overall? I'd have thought NHS Trust staff were much more at risk of exposure than the general population.
I have lost tack of the situation with antibody tests - are these now widely available?
Two of my crew who were going offshore had to have the standard swab test a couple of days before they flew out and then stayed in isolation until the chopper. While they were having the swab testing done in Aberdeen - provided by a private contracted company - they asked if the antibody test was available and were told yes for a cost of £50. One of them had it and came back as positive - having had the virus in the past. The other waited until he got home and then had the antibody test - again he came back as positive.
However both have since tried to get the test for their partners and have been told it has been stopped for private sale temporarily by the Government. I have no idea if this is actually the case or if there is some other reason why they have not been able to get it.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Cummings actual breach was relatively trivial and would have been old news with an apology within a week. It was the attempted coverup and then the brazening it out that stuck in voters’ craw. “Barnard Castle” will be a hackneyed punch line akin to “tired and emotional” in years to come.
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I agree. The mistreatment of African-Americans by the police is nothing new, and has happened throughout my life. What is (relatively) new is the ability to demonstrate this is happening through phone video recordings, largely by bystanders.
A subsidiary factor that could have led to a rise in such cases may be that Trump has emboldened a minority of the police, and some of his other supporters, to exercise their 'freedoms' in the pursuit of their prejudices, as in the Ahmaud Arbery case.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Cummings actual breach was relatively trivial and would have been old news with an apology within a week. It was the attempted coverup and then the brazening it out that stuck in voters’ craw. “Barnard Castle” will be a hackneyed punch line akin to “tired and emotional” in years to come.
I disagree, in 4 years time nobody will remember Cummings
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
I agree.
And, yet, you have articles published in the Guardian saying that Britain invented racism, we are responsible for its incubation in America and are just as bad in every way.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Advisors in HR departments around the country are echoing this absolutely with everyone nodding along like donkeys.
We all secretly know it's been hugely overblown: we're just nervous of commenting as such in a highly-emotionally charged situation.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Opposition MPs are irrelevant because they don't make the rules. The economic trouble will define it, but the Cummings will remain important it defines what the govt were up to at the critical moment.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Opposition MPs are irrelevant because they don't make the rules. The economic trouble will define it, but the Cummings will remain important it defines what the govt were up to at the critical moment.
Cummings will be long gone and the agenda will have moved on
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
incidentally, in my Trust 10% of tested staff are coming back antibody positive. I don't think all 5000 have yet been processed, but that fits with the 7% rate in the national sample. We are maybe 1/6th of the way to herd immunity.
Another colleague of mine down badly with it today. I shared a room with her last week.
Does 10% of and NHS Trust's staff being antibody positive really equate to 7% overall? I'd have thought NHS Trust staff were much more at risk of exposure than the general population.
I have lost tack of the situation with antibody tests - are these now widely available?
Two of my crew who were going offshore had to have the standard swab test a couple of days before they flew out and then stayed in isolation until the chopper. While they were having the swab testing done in Aberdeen - provided by a private contracted company - they asked if the antibody test was available and were told yes for a cost of £50. One of them had it and came back as positive - having had the virus in the past. The other waited until he got home and then had the antibody test - again he came back as positive.
However both have since tried to get the test for their partners and have been told it has been stopped for private sale temporarily by the Government. I have no idea if this is actually the case or if there is some other reason why they have not been able to get it.
Makes sense to control it centrally if (as I assume) there is a limited supply. Very important for HMG and SAGE to understand the total picture re antibodies and I assume they are not going to find that out if tests are administered privately.
At what point, I wonder, would evidence of a relatively high percentage of the population having CV-19 antibodies lead to a shift in lockdown policy?
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
I thought it was very telling that when raising significant racist police incident in the UK, the example brought out yesterday was Stephen Lawrence, which was 27 years ago. The US don't seem to be able to go 27 days without something.
Orders of magnitude difference in issues between the two countries.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Opposition MPs are irrelevant because they don't make the rules. The economic trouble will define it, but the Cummings will remain important it defines what the govt were up to at the critical moment.
Nah, as people are given their cards they're not going to be thinking about a bloke who drove to Durham, as much as you'd like to think so.
As somebody pointed out earlier, we've already moved on from black lives to Madeleine McCann, Cummings is fish and chip paper
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Cummings actual breach was relatively trivial and would have been old news with an apology within a week. It was the attempted coverup and then the brazening it out that stuck in voters’ craw. “Barnard Castle” will be a hackneyed punch line akin to “tired and emotional” in years to come.
I disagree, in 4 years time nobody will remember Cummings
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
When he gets the partisan bit between his teeth he goes all Damien McBride and is utterly unreadable.
I have lost tack of the situation with antibody tests - are these now widely available?
Just started a few days back, 200k done so far, 40k today. Only thing I've seen about plans:
"...plans to provide antibody tests to NHS and care staff in England from the end of May. Clinicians will also be able to request the tests for patients in both hospital and social care settings if they think it’s appropriate.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
You think they'd have used water cannons? Opened fire?
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Opposition MPs are irrelevant because they don't make the rules. The economic trouble will define it, but the Cummings will remain important it defines what the govt were up to at the critical moment.
Nah, as people are given their cards they're not going to be thinking about a bloke who drove to Durham, as much as you'd like to think so.
As somebody pointed out earlier, we've already moved on from black lives to Madeleine McCann, Cummings is fish and chip paper
Yesterdays poll showed just 7% (yes 7%) said Cummings had affected their behaviour
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Opposition MPs are irrelevant because they don't make the rules. The economic trouble will define it, but the Cummings will remain important it defines what the govt were up to at the critical moment.
Nah, as people are given their cards they're not going to be thinking about a bloke who drove to Durham, as much as you'd like to think so.
As somebody pointed out earlier, we've already moved on from black lives to Madeleine McCann, Cummings is fish and chip paper
When you get your cards and ask what the govt did for you and wonder who is to blame, you will remember the shambles and the hypocrisy and that the government cared more about its own at the key moment.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
Rubbish and you know it.
Government and police aren't breaking it up because they fear another 2011 riots situation nationwide.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Cummings actual breach was relatively trivial and would have been old news with an apology within a week. It was the attempted coverup and then the brazening it out that stuck in voters’ craw. “Barnard Castle” will be a hackneyed punch line akin to “tired and emotional” in years to come.
I disagree, in 4 years time nobody will remember Cummings
Guardianistas who already hated him will ...
They'll have another target by then, Cummings will be long gone
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
I agree.
And, yet, you have articles published in the Guardian saying that Britain invented racism, we are responsible for its incubation in America and are just as bad in every way.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Advisors in HR departments around the country are echoing this absolutely with everyone nodding along like donkeys.
We all secretly know it's been hugely overblown: we're just nervous of commenting as such in a highly-emotionally charged situation.
I think unconscious bias is a well-proven phenomenom which we pretty much all exhibit. The shocking conclusion of that is that, yes, we are all at least a little bit racist even though we don't intend to be.
Acknowledging that is an important step to resolving it imo.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Cummings actual breach was relatively trivial and would have been old news with an apology within a week. It was the attempted coverup and then the brazening it out that stuck in voters’ craw. “Barnard Castle” will be a hackneyed punch line akin to “tired and emotional” in years to come.
I disagree, in 4 years time nobody will remember Cummings
Sadiq Khan gave the go ahead for yesterday. He isn't comprised by Big Dom scandal. To be fair to him, i think it was going to happen one way or another, whatever he said.
Sadiq Khan gave the go ahead for yesterday. He isn't comprised by Big Dom scandal. To be fair to him, i think it was going to happen one way or another, whatever he said.
Yes but he could have been firmer in telling people not to come to it.
I have lost tack of the situation with antibody tests - are these now widely available?
Just started a few days back, 200k done so far, 40k today. Only thing I've seen about plans:
"...plans to provide antibody tests to NHS and care staff in England from the end of May. Clinicians will also be able to request the tests for patients in both hospital and social care settings if they think it’s appropriate.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Opposition MPs are irrelevant because they don't make the rules. The economic trouble will define it, but the Cummings will remain important it defines what the govt were up to at the critical moment.
Nah, as people are given their cards they're not going to be thinking about a bloke who drove to Durham, as much as you'd like to think so.
As somebody pointed out earlier, we've already moved on from black lives to Madeleine McCann, Cummings is fish and chip paper
Yesterdays poll showed just 7% (yes 7%) said Cummings had affected their behaviour
Is that out of a hundred people flouting the lockdown laws seven were there because of Cummings, or is that out of a hundred people seven were out flouting the lockdown laws and ninety three were obediently inside?
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
You are being absurd.
Care to explain how
It can't say anything about people bending the rules without ridicule.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Opposition MPs are irrelevant because they don't make the rules. The economic trouble will define it, but the Cummings will remain important it defines what the govt were up to at the critical moment.
Nah, as people are given their cards they're not going to be thinking about a bloke who drove to Durham, as much as you'd like to think so.
As somebody pointed out earlier, we've already moved on from black lives to Madeleine McCann, Cummings is fish and chip paper
When you get your cards and ask what the govt did for you and wonder who is to blame, you will remember the shambles and the hypocrisy and that the government cared more about its own at the key moment.
Oh yes Boris will get the blame, of that there is no doubt.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
You think they'd have used water cannons? Opened fire?
They only use water cannon against predominantly white folks - in Northern Ireland.
Sadiq Khan gave the go ahead for yesterday. He isn't comprised by Big Dom scandal. To be fair to him, i think it was going to happen one way or another, whatever he said.
Nobody could or should have tried to stop it
However, the lack of social distancing is a real worry
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
I agree.
And, yet, you have articles published in the Guardian saying that Britain invented racism, we are responsible for its incubation in America and are just as bad in every way.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Advisors in HR departments around the country are echoing this absolutely with everyone nodding along like donkeys.
We all secretly know it's been hugely overblown: we're just nervous of commenting as such in a highly-emotionally charged situation.
Michael Portillo currently has a show on ch5 about the Empire that is pretty damning about our colonial behaviour including, but not only, the racism. There can't be much doubt that our position in the world was built on shaky moral foundations. Behind every great fortune is a crime forgotten as they say
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Cummings actual breach was relatively trivial and would have been old news with an apology within a week. It was the attempted coverup and then the brazening it out that stuck in voters’ craw. “Barnard Castle” will be a hackneyed punch line akin to “tired and emotional” in years to come.
I disagree, in 4 years time nobody will remember Cummings
incidentally, in my Trust 10% of tested staff are coming back antibody positive. I don't think all 5000 have yet been processed, but that fits with the 7% rate in the national sample. We are maybe 1/6th of the way to herd immunity.
Another colleague of mine down badly with it today. I shared a room with her last week.
Does 10% of and NHS Trust's staff being antibody positive really equate to 7% overall? I'd have thought NHS Trust staff were much more at risk of exposure than the general population.
I have lost tack of the situation with antibody tests - are these now widely available?
Its NHS staff first. We have 11 000 staff in our Trust, so nearly halfway there (not had mine yet). I am not sure how many of the 5000 have been analysed or how other Trusts are getting on.
This is the highly reliable Roche test, rather than the previously unreliable ones.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
Rubbish and you know it.
Government and police aren't breaking it up because they fear another 2011 riots situation nationwide.
This is right. Cummings isn't helpful so far as lockdown compliance goes but the people at the protest won't have noticed or cared about him. They want to smash capitalism and the Tories.
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
I agree.
And, yet, you have articles published in the Guardian saying that Britain invented racism, we are responsible for its incubation in America and are just as bad in every way.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Advisors in HR departments around the country are echoing this absolutely with everyone nodding along like donkeys.
We all secretly know it's been hugely overblown: we're just nervous of commenting as such in a highly-emotionally charged situation.
The Guardian overblown? You shock me!
Being serious though, there is an issue with the UK police and racism, so we should not rest on our laurels (not that we are winning any prizes), and also in the workplace, I might be biased, HR departments and aggrieved employees are my clients after all, but there are real issues that cause understandable anger in the black community. Add to the mix the video from the States, a country we are culturally very close to and influenced by, the frustrations of the lockdown, the economic uncertainty, and the disproportionate effect the Covid-19 crisis is having on the black community (we don’t agree why this is but that community will have their views that absolutely must be listened to) then we have a highly combustible situation. I think yesterday’s demo was absolutely necessary to defuse it. We’ll see in two weeks whether it has an effect on the infection rates.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
You miss my point
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Cummings actual breach was relatively trivial and would have been old news with an apology within a week. It was the attempted coverup and then the brazening it out that stuck in voters’ craw. “Barnard Castle” will be a hackneyed punch line akin to “tired and emotional” in years to come.
I disagree, in 4 years time nobody will remember Cummings
Will things really change in the USA as a result of all this? Perhaps I'm cynical but why is it different to any other time it has happened? Trump, to be sure, is an unpredictable factor to throw into the mix, but even so.
The effect of all these unarmed black deaths is cumulative, and the pace of publicized incidents will probably increase with the ubiquity of cell phone video. Black people's behaviour is changing, so that they routinely record all encounters with the police.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
I think the policing unions are a problem - far too much abuse and incompetence is covered up.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
The policing problems we have in this country, which are real, are peanuts compared to the cancerous effects of the militarisation of American policing.
I agree.
And, yet, you have articles published in the Guardian saying that Britain invented racism, we are responsible for its incubation in America and are just as bad in every way.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Advisors in HR departments around the country are echoing this absolutely with everyone nodding along like donkeys.
We all secretly know it's been hugely overblown: we're just nervous of commenting as such in a highly-emotionally charged situation.
I think unconscious bias is a well-proven phenomenom which we pretty much all exhibit. The shocking conclusion of that is that, yes, we are all at least a little bit racist even though we don't intend to be.
Acknowledging that is an important step to resolving it imo.
Yes, that's part of the human condition. It happens in all walks of life.
But that proportional and moderate argument isn't the one being made.
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
If he's been made redundant before the furlough ends that is indeed worrying. There'll be so many in the next few months, dreadful situation
Many millions across the UK, EU and worldwide
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
The Cummings nonsense is important in two ways. The government chucked away much of its authority and when we look back at these times we will remember a govt that did one thing whilst preaching another. It was looking after its own more then looking after you.
The Cummings story ended in London yesterday
Really, arguably it made the events in London possible.
Now that is utter nonsense
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
The govt lost its authority to enforce its own rules.
And what has that to do with yesterdays protest
The govt would have responded differently if Cummings had not happened.
You are being absurd.
Care to explain how
It can't say anything about people bending the rules without ridicule.
Are you referring to Duffield, Kinnock and Gardiner yesterday (all labour) who broke the rules
Comments
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52920291
In a letter seen by Telegraph Sport, Richard Masters told Hatice Cengiz’s lawyer he was “extremely sympathetic to your client’s position” after Rodney Dixon QC twice wrote to him on her behalf urging him to block the proposed £300 million deal.
It is the first time the Premier League has acknowledged it is examining allegations of murder and human rights abuses as part of the owners’ and directors’ test being conducted over the Newcastle takeover. Masters did, however, refuse to meet Cengiz after Dixon had requested he do so “as soon as possible”.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/football/2020/06/04/exclusive-premier-league-fully-considering-calls-stop-newcastles/
https://twitter.com/cnnbrk/status/1268650861070344193
Big_G_NorthWales said:
' Maybe but as has been said do not underestimate Boris ability to win over normal voters
Boris has lost me, but I think many on here see Starmer as a messiah and he is far from that, though he is a huge relief from the toxic days of Corbyn'
The fact that he has lost you as a Tory loyalist must make it highly likely that many other less Tory-inclined voters will have seen the scales fall from their eyes.I suspect that many of the firsttime Tory voters from last December already feel pretty disillusioned with Johnson - and the factors which attracted them to him - Brexit and Corbyn - have ceased to be relevant.
The poll leads we were seeing two months ago were always artificial and were never going to last. The vote shares we are now being presented with are much more realistic with some return to normal politics having been accelerated by recent perceptions of Government mismanagement. On the basis of earlier Parliaments,however, there must be a strong possibility - particularly given the economic storms which lie ahead - that the polls are continuing to flatter the Tories relative to their likely performance in 2024. When we look back to other big election victories from 2001 - 1997 - 1987 - 1966 - and 1959, the ruling party was doing a fair bit better six months into those Parliaments than it was able to sustain at the subsequent General Election several years later
First comment on my FB page (yes I'm that old) from a friend who has just been made redundant after 16 years having been furloughed.
Entertainment, marquees.
To me it really does feel like an 'enough is enough' time. That does not mean that everything will be resolved perfectly in a few weeks or months, but I do think that the pressure for systemic change to how policing is done will be relentless until things improve markedly.
Of course, I could be wrong.
Atletico Madrid forward Diego Costa has avoided a six-month prison term - but will have to pay a fine of €543,208 (£485,324) for tax fraud.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-52920608
I am a member and will remain so and will vote conservative
How governments deal with it will decide their destiny
And not Cummings nonsense
What Johnson has dreamt of all his life will turn out to be worse than he could have possibly imagined. I'm with others who think he'll jack it in by the end of the year
I've seen a few (British) acquaintances, who'd subscribed to it for the quality of their journalism, unsubscribe today. I'd usually dismiss it as Twitter posturing but it seems legit - not least because they all go on to complain about how hard it is to actually get the NYT to cancel a subscription.
Well, maybe they do. Let's see the evidence. Citation needed, as the saying goes.
(And please let's not repost the completely bonkers Jon Stone tweet from earlier today, in which he demolished his own argument by referencing a US text which showed nothing of the sort).
So yes I am convinced that COO labelling is allowed. Because the US wants it.
https://www.leicestermercury.co.uk/news/leicester-news/coronavirus-frontline-nhs-staff-one-4192988
Another colleague of mine down badly with it today. I shared a room with her last week.
We are all bored of it but it's not going away anytime soon.
But, these things go round in circles. Theresa May dialled back on stop & search for similar reasons - until it led to a big spike in knife crime, which affects inner cities communities the most.
I have lost tack of the situation with antibody tests - are these now widely available?
The way HMG deals with the job loses and economic armageddon will define it, not Cummings, Duffield, Kinnock and now Gardiner's breaches of covid regs
Orders of magnitude difference in issues between the two countries.
I can't see anything a out shooting protestors and he draws (quite rightly) comparisons with how troops were used to quell violence from whites opposing desegregation in the 1960s.
However both have since tried to get the test for their partners and have been told it has been stopped for private sale temporarily by the Government. I have no idea if this is actually the case or if there is some other reason why they have not been able to get it.
A subsidiary factor that could have led to a rise in such cases may be that Trump has emboldened a minority of the police, and some of his other supporters, to exercise their 'freedoms' in the pursuit of their prejudices, as in the Ahmaud Arbery case.
If Cummings had not happened, yesteday would still have happened with the outrage over the murder by US police of yet another black man
Black lives matter
And, yet, you have articles published in the Guardian saying that Britain invented racism, we are responsible for its incubation in America and are just as bad in every way.
Equality, Diversity and Inclusion Advisors in HR departments around the country are echoing this absolutely with everyone nodding along like donkeys.
We all secretly know it's been hugely overblown: we're just nervous of commenting as such in a highly-emotionally charged situation.
At what point, I wonder, would evidence of a relatively high percentage of the population having CV-19 antibodies lead to a shift in lockdown policy?
As somebody pointed out earlier, we've already moved on from black lives to Madeleine McCann, Cummings is fish and chip paper
"...plans to provide antibody tests to NHS and care staff in England from the end of May.
Clinicians will also be able to request the tests for patients in both hospital and social care settings if they think it’s appropriate.
....blahblah.....
The government is also working in partnership with the private sector to develop a ‘finger-prick’ type test, similar to a diabetes test, which will be suitable for use at home and without medical supervision but has not yet been validated for use. We will provide more detail on the development of this test.
"
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-antibody-tests/coronavirus-covid-19-antibody-tests
Government and police aren't breaking it up because they fear another 2011 riots situation nationwide.
Care to explain how
Acknowledging that is an important step to resolving it imo.
But they won't blame Cummings
However, the lack of social distancing is a real worry
https://twitter.com/dave_brown24/status/1268629914502266883
This is the highly reliable Roche test, rather than the previously unreliable ones.
https://www.medtechdive.com/news/abbott-roche-ink-deals-with-uk-for-10m-coronavirus-antibody-tests/578486/
Cummings isn't helpful so far as lockdown compliance goes but the people at the protest won't have noticed or cared about him. They want to smash capitalism and the Tories.
Being serious though, there is an issue with the UK police and racism, so we should not rest on our laurels (not that we are winning any prizes), and also in the workplace, I might be biased, HR departments and aggrieved employees are my clients after all, but there are real issues that cause understandable anger in the black community. Add to the mix the video from the States, a country we are culturally very close to and influenced by, the frustrations of the lockdown, the economic uncertainty, and the disproportionate effect the Covid-19 crisis is having on the black community (we don’t agree why this is but that community will have their views that absolutely must be listened to) then we have a highly combustible situation. I think yesterday’s demo was absolutely necessary to defuse it. We’ll see in two weeks whether it has an effect on the infection rates.
But that proportional and moderate argument isn't the one being made.