Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Cumming warned by police after breaking lockdown rules

135

Comments

  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,413

    eadric said:
    The guidelines would allow his parents to travel to collect the children, but not the other way round - but we're at the point of arguing about details and, so, yes, it may save him.

    I would never conceive of taking Coronavirus into my parent's house, though.
    It's not just the guidelines, it's the logic of the position.

    "We were too ill to look after the kids, but not too ill to drive three or four hours to my parents".

    Pure, steaming bullshit.
    3 or 4 hours to Durham?
    Breaking the speed limit too?
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    Scott_xP said:
    Kaboom!

    Johnson faces the hardest decision of his premiership so far.
    It's the easiest decision imaginable: keep the man who help secure his victory, or let him go and gratify legions of his political enemies for no reason at all.

    Hmm ... that is a hard one.
    "Do as I say, not as I do"?
    T'was ever thus comrade.....
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,006
    kyf_100 said:

    OllyT said:

    kyf_100 said:

    MaxPB said:

    Meh.

    Yep. I find it a bit of a really odd non-story.

    Like how people on here were convinced the Arcuri thing would lead to Bojo resigning. Where did that one go? Oh yeah, nowhere.

    Very few people thought it would be the end for Boris and it's a little too early to say it went nowhere. The police have decided there is no criminal case to answer but that does mean that what he did was ethical. It hasn't completely run is course yet.
    Plenty of people on this board were saying Boris would be gone within weeks at the time, and that was months ago. The police have decided there is no case to answer so it is literally time to say it went nowhere. But you keep clutching those straws if it makes you feel better at night.

    This Cummings story is the same. Of huge interest to the Westminster bubble but of little to no interest to the general public, who probably don't have a clue who Cummings is (unless they watched that thingy with Benedict Cumberbatch) and couldn't give a toss - about half of the general public having broken the lockdown in the last couple of weeks anyway.

    It is a non-story in the real world.

    Cummings did this at the end of March when very few were breaking the lockdown. Let's see how the papers deal with it before concluding it's a non-story.

    Given the high-profile resignations of Calderwood and Fergusson the problem the government has is that if Cummings just carries on it will seem to many that there is one rule for Tories and one for rest of us. Jenrick got away with it by the skin of his teeth.

    Same with Boris and the contract going to a woman he appears to have been bonking, he might get away with it and many people know that they wouldn't have got away with it. I understand that one of the reasons no action was taken was that a lot of emails for that period have been "lost".

    Neither issue is critical but these things have a habit of building and I can well remember Major's government getting bogged down in these sort of issues. and we are only a few months into this government.
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,878
    Jonathan said:

    Who are we to question the Cummings and goings of our masters?

    Hold on! I'm Cummings!
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,680

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    Sir Keir must be dreading the thought of Boris telling him, 'How dare you question your betters.'
  • IanB2IanB2 Posts: 49,868
    eadric said:

    IanB2 said:

    eadric said:

    Nonsense.

    Farage is a journalist: he has a show on LBC. He is explicitly allowed to travel around, covering stories related to coronavirus. The government has expressly allowed this. Journalists in this field are seen as key workers, doing essential work.

    Farage’s story was that the government was ignoring a migrant crisis in the Channel while they focused overly on Covid-19. His latest migrant videos have been viewed by millions, which is a lot more people than read the Guardian or the Times.

    Entirely justified. Try again.
    So now you’re the expert on who is allowed to travel?
    It’s the rules. Check em out

    “Government gives 'key worker' status to all journalists reporting on coronavirus pandemic to the public“

    https://www.pressgazette.co.uk/government-gives-key-worker-status-to-all-journalists-reporting-on-coronavirus-pandemic/
    I’m thinking your need to check them out is the greater....
  • LostPasswordLostPassword Posts: 18,434
    I think it was probably very responsible of the Newspapers to sit on this story for a few weeks, if that's what they've done. If this had come out earlier then it might have encouraged other people to break lockdown.
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    Nigelb said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    The leader of the opposition has made no such demand.
    It’s you that seems to be spoiling for a fight.
    Don't be silly. He will as soon as the 'swift explanation' has been received and dismissed as inadequate. Strategy involves thinking more than one step ahead.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,259
    dixiedean said:

    HYUFD said:

    Scott_xP said:
    Greece and Italy locked down before the UK did so obviously the UK should open up after them
    Indeed. And Greece is a non-comparison given the difference in performance.
    I doubt also if either have many pubs like ours.
    Few countries do.
    They do, I've been in a few in Athens and Rome. Trastevere is full of them.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,002
    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938633771425792

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938806279012352

    Hancock welcomed the Ferguson resignation so he pretty much has to call for Dom's
  • dixiedeandixiedean Posts: 29,413
    No doubt a line of questioning for next PMQs is already being prepared.
    Of course Starmer wants Cummings to stay.
  • Scott_xP said:
    Kaboom!

    Johnson faces the hardest decision of his premiership so far.
    It's the easiest decision imaginable: keep the man who help secure his victory, or let him go and gratify legions of his political enemies for no reason at all.

    Hmm ... that is a hard one.
    It's not for no reason.

    If Cummings stays, it will be used against Johnson forever. It will be said that it is one rule for him, another for us. While you were in lockdown, the PM's cronies were flouting the rules etc. And those criticisms will be wholly correct.

    If Cummings goes, the answer is "he did wrong and he went".
    Literally _everything_ is used against Boris forever. Remember the prorogation? The unprorogation? His children? The Andrew Neil empty chair interview? The watermelon smiles? His jokey columns from 25 years ago?

    His opponents bring up everything all the time - one more won't make any difference. As Jowett said 'Never regret, never explain, never apologize', and Boris should bloody well follow that example.
    The trouble with this one is that everyone else in the country (just about) was following the rules at some considerable personal cost.

    All the other things you mention are, to a large extent, bubble stories. Who cares if Johnson is a shagger, for example. The problem with this is that people have had a hell of a time over the past few weeks - it's not just been a faff, it's often been financially and psychologically very painful. The Government cannot afford for people to be left with the view that it was one rule for them and another for everyone else.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381
    Scott_xP said:

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938633771425792

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938806279012352

    Hancock welcomed the Ferguson resignation so he pretty much has to call for Dom's

    Dom doesn't even make the BBC 10 o clock news. It is that inconsequential.
  • OllyTOllyT Posts: 5,006
    edited May 2020

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of Boris if he dares show up.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Scott_xP said:
    If rhe Grauniad had this story for six weeks why have they sat on it for that long?

    I think this story would have been much bigger four to six weeks ago. Vast majority of people were taking the lockdown 100% seriously then. In recent weeks its obvious that its become normal for many people to see family and friends even if its not technically allowed.

    Six weeks ago I think this story would have been outrageous, now I think it will be considered cheeky.
  • IshmaelZIshmaelZ Posts: 21,830

    Scott_xP said:

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938633771425792

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938806279012352

    Hancock welcomed the Ferguson resignation so he pretty much has to call for Dom's

    Dom doesn't even make the BBC 10 o clock news. It is that inconsequential.
    Labour demanding an explanation was the first item on Radio 2 news just now.
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    edited May 2020
    DougSeal said:

    Nigelb said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    The leader of the opposition has made no such demand.
    It’s you that seems to be spoiling for a fight.
    Don't be silly. He will as soon as the 'swift explanation' has been received and dismissed as inadequate. Strategy involves thinking more than one step ahead.
    Starmer is a QC. He knows when he’s onto a winner. If Cummings goes it will be forgotten about. Starmer won’t let it. Did you see Corbyn willing to interview with the Telegraph? He’s far more media aware. He’s thought about 8 steps ahead. He wants Cummings to stay as long as possible. Every week he’s there is a possibility of a reminder, This will be the gift that keeps giving
    Then a calculation has to be made by the Conservatives: do Cummings' political talents as an adviser outweigh any blowback from riding out this story? I think they do by a factor of 10 or more, but others will make their own judgements.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Scott_xP said:
    Grauniad sat on this story and didn't consider it worth printing for six weeks, but the News at 10 must be nefarious for not putting it in the headlines tonight?
  • TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052

    Scott_xP said:

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938633771425792

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938806279012352

    Hancock welcomed the Ferguson resignation so he pretty much has to call for Dom's

    Dom doesn't even make the BBC 10 o clock news. It is that inconsequential.
    No no - without Dom there will be a people’s referendum by Whitsun...
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036
    So which motorway services did Cumstain stop off at for a slash?

    How many did he put at risk there?
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    edited May 2020
    OllyT said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of him.
    Oh no - will Starmer also split like an amoeba and create another 164 Labour MPs? If not, he can be safely ignored for quite some time to come.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    DougSeal said:

    Nigelb said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    The leader of the opposition has made no such demand.
    It’s you that seems to be spoiling for a fight.
    Don't be silly. He will as soon as the 'swift explanation' has been received and dismissed as inadequate. Strategy involves thinking more than one step ahead.
    Starmer is a QC. He knows when he’s onto a winner. If Cummings goes it will be forgotten about. Starmer won’t let it. Did you see Corbyn willing to interview with the Telegraph? He’s far more media aware. He’s thought about 8 steps ahead. He wants Cummings to stay as long as possible. Every week he’s there is a possibility of a reminder, This will be the gift that keeps giving
    Then a calculation has to be made by the Conservatibes: do Cummings' political talents as an advisor outweigh any blowback from riding out this story? I think they do by a factor of 10 or more, but others will make their own judgements.
    Horses for courses. Cummings read the mood on Brexit very well. His time at education was a lot less successful. I don’t think he’s understood the new reality.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117
    DougSeal said:

    Nigelb said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    The leader of the opposition has made no such demand.
    It’s you that seems to be spoiling for a fight.
    Don't be silly. He will as soon as the 'swift explanation' has been received and dismissed as inadequate. Strategy involves thinking more than one step ahead.
    Starmer is a QC. He knows when he’s onto a winner. If Cummings goes it will be forgotten about. Starmer won’t let it. Did you see Corbyn willing to interview with the Telegraph? He’s far more media aware. He’s thought about 8 steps ahead. He wants Cummings to stay as long as possible. Every week he’s there is a possibility of a reminder, This will be the gift that keeps giving
    Great insight....Cummings rubs the Tories up the wrong way much more than us lefties.....he's such an unlikeable creation....he's not going anywhere....
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036

    Scott_xP said:

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938633771425792

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938806279012352

    Hancock welcomed the Ferguson resignation so he pretty much has to call for Dom's

    Dom doesn't even make the BBC 10 o clock news. It is that inconsequential.
    Did you doze off? I saw the report.
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381
    IshmaelZ said:

    Scott_xP said:

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938633771425792

    https://twitter.com/lewis_goodall/status/1263938806279012352

    Hancock welcomed the Ferguson resignation so he pretty much has to call for Dom's

    Dom doesn't even make the BBC 10 o clock news. It is that inconsequential.
    Labour demanding an explanation was the first item on Radio 2 news just now.
    ...sorry second story but not a headline story.
  • justin124justin124 Posts: 11,527

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    Would the Fuhrer have sacked Heydrich?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695

    OllyT said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of him.
    Oh no - will Starmer also split like an amoeba and created another 164 Labour MPs? If not, he can be safely ignored for quite some time to come.
    Given your ferocious defence of Cummings I suspect you can see he is toast.
  • kyf_100kyf_100 Posts: 4,951
    Nigelb said:

    Scott_xP said:
    I think there might be one or two others.
    Not many pubs in Saudi Arabia, for instance...
    Could you get a pint in a pub before quarantine in Saudi, then?

    Not sure comparing us to a moralising dictatorship with a literal fun police is the best comparsion to make your point, but hey-ho.
  • eekeek Posts: 28,405

    OllyT said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of him.
    Oh no - will Starmer also split like an amoeba and created another 164 Labour MPs? If not, he can be safely ignored for quite some time to come.
    Given your ferocious defence of Cummings I suspect you can see he is toast.
    In the same way that the tories Housing Minister is enjoying more time at home?

    It's a nothing story...
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,002
    Dom and his wife wrote an article in the Spectator describing their illness.

    That seems to contradict their travel story...

    https://twitter.com/AndrewCooper__/status/1263941870557761538
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,999
    It's not fake news though is it? Is that just the standard response to stuff we don't like now?

    https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1263935353834164225?s=20
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,259
    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,675
    The curious thing about this is Cummings isn’t thick. He would know this would happen. He either thinks he’s untouchable or has had enough and no longer gives a shit. I guess the latter and it’s down to treasury forecasts and we should be worried.

  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556

    OllyT said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of him.
    Oh no - will Starmer also split like an amoeba and created another 164 Labour MPs? If not, he can be safely ignored for quite some time to come.
    Given your ferocious defence of Cummings I suspect you can see he is toast.
    Not really. I don't think it's impossible that he goes, but if he goes now, it will be because they wanted to sack him anyway.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    So which motorway services did Cumstain stop off at for a slash?

    How many did he put at risk there?

    I think...without going too much into gory details...he stopped off for a dump (which is likely since Covid does wonders with your inners)...and Dom would not have left the toilet seat down when he flushed....
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826
    Scott_xP said:
    Laughable.

    The Gruaniad sat on it for six weeks, and the BBC is what these lunatics are frothing about? God forbid the BBC quotes both sides of a story that the Grauniad eventually thinks its worth publishing.
  • TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    Anne Franks diary would have been a short pamphlet in Durham - snitch central 🤪
  • MexicanpeteMexicanpete Posts: 28,381
    Oops, top story in ITN.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,002
    Jonathan said:

    The curious thing about this is Cummings isn’t thick. He would know this would happen. He either thinks he’s untouchable

    He is untouchable.

    BoZo works for him...
  • OnlyLivingBoyOnlyLivingBoy Posts: 15,798
    Nigelb said:

    Toms said:

    TimT said:

    TimT said:

    Toms said:

    We're in
    "Do you know who I am?"
    territory.
    It happens a lot with our politicians.
    Are we unusual in that? For instance is it class based?

    No. Hollywood does that just as well. Caught DUI behind the wheel, Reese Witherspoon used those precise words with her arresting officer.
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6gAc6aNoNLM

    Careful with what you say there!* She was the passenger, it was her husband who was being stopped for suspected DUI.

    A slight difference in wording, but for afficionadoes of these things, I liked how "Do you know my name?" was followed by "You're about to find out who I am!"

    * She might sue you for getting that wrong, she's an American citizen don't you know!
    Thank you for the correction(s).
    Yuck.
    Until now I, for one, had never heard of Reese Witherspoon.
    You've never watched Legally Blonde (and Legally Blonde 2)?

    You're missing out.

    Ditto Big Little Lies.
    Pleasantville is a charming film.
    It is.
    And, of course, Election and Cruel Intentions.

    She was event decent in The Importance of Being Earnest.
    Cruel Intentions has one of the greatest lines in cinema. If you've seen it you'll know what I'm talking about.
    On that subject, Cummings has to go. Part of me hopes he stays so the government can be tortured over the hypocrisy and born to rule arrogance of it for weeks on end. But really we don't need this kind of distraction when we are in the middle of a public health emergency and the public need to be able to trust the government.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    edited May 2020

    OllyT said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of him.
    Oh no - will Starmer also split like an amoeba and create another 164 Labour MPs? If not, he can be safely ignored for quite some time to come.
    Really? I’m reminded of the story told about the Molotov and Ribbentrop talks in Berlin in November 1940 when the latter told the former that BrItain was finished as a power, and Molotov replied by asking why then they were having the conversation in an air raid shelter? Similarly, why, if Starmer can safely be ignored, has the immigrant tax on care workers been scrapped this week?
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411
    eadric said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    As of today, everyone I know under 40 either wants lockdown to end, or is now totally ignoring lockdown

    Lots of over-40s as well
    Time for lockdown to end

    Stop the furlough

    Get back to work

    Open the pubs!
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117
    edited May 2020

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    Exactly...you reach somewhere...and then, a nice pint (no), a meal (no), a film (no), a gig (no), a coffee (no) anything else (no).....it's time to go home.....and then same again tomorrow, and the day after
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695

    It's not fake news though is it? Is that just the standard response to stuff we don't like now?

    https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1263935353834164225?s=20

    "... he isn't going nowhere." Where is he going then?
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,563
    eadric said:
    Assuming the tweeter is in the UK that moth is a very long way from home.

    I believe it is the Rosy Maple Moth whose range is normally the other side of the Atlantic.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036
    eadric said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    As of today, everyone I know under 40 either wants lockdown to end, or is now totally ignoring lockdown

    Lots of over-40s as well
    You know lots of dickheads.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    The Mail have put this story on their front page (though not the headline).
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541
    TGOHF666 said:

    Anne Franks diary would have been a short pamphlet in Durham - snitch central 🤪

    This site is full of them. The amount of moralising that goes on.
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of him.
    Oh no - will Starmer also split like an amoeba and create another 164 Labour MPs? If not, he can be safely ignored for quite some time to come.
    Really? I’m reminded of the story told about the Molotov and Ribbentrop talks in Berlin in November 1940 when the latter told the former that BrItain was finished as a power, and Molotov replied by asking why then they were having the conversation in an air raid shelter? Similarly, why, if Starmer can safely be ignored, has the immigrant tax on care workers been scrapped this week?
    I wouldn't have scrapped it simply because he asked for it, but the polling showed it was a popular decision and it didn't cost very much so I'm not going to cry about it. Dumping Cummings is a much weightier decision that should not be gifted to the Opposition, many of whom will see his scalp as a great victory, whatever Starmer's personal strategic calculations.
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382

    Scott_xP said:
    Laughable.

    The Gruaniad sat on it for six weeks, and the BBC is what these lunatics are frothing about? God forbid the BBC quotes both sides of a story that the Grauniad eventually thinks its worth publishing.
    A BoJo fan boy speaks.
  • Scott_xP said:

    Jonathan said:

    The curious thing about this is Cummings isn’t thick. He would know this would happen. He either thinks he’s untouchable

    He is untouchable.

    BoZo works for him...
    This was said about Trump and Bannon.

    These people are masters of the universe until the moment the elected leader brings them in and says, "the benefit of your services no longer outweighs the costs".
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036
    tyson said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    Exactly...you reach somewhere...and then, a nice pint (no), a meal (no), a film (no), a gig (no), a coffee (no) anything else (no).....it's time to go home.....and then same again tomorrow, and the day after
    If that's all you want then travel is pointless anyway.
  • TGOHF666TGOHF666 Posts: 2,052
    DougSeal said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Anne Franks diary would have been a short pamphlet in Durham - snitch central 🤪

    This site is full of them. The amount of moralising that goes on.
    The real scandal is the lockdown - absolute insult to freedom - man sits in car to visit parents - BURN THE WITCH.

    At least the USA has a sense of freedom left in its bones.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Scott_xP said:
    Laughable.

    The Gruaniad sat on it for six weeks, and the BBC is what these lunatics are frothing about? God forbid the BBC quotes both sides of a story that the Grauniad eventually thinks its worth publishing.
    A BoJo fan boy speaks.
    Yeah - and? Deal with the message not the messenger, you're a Boris critic but I don't dismiss whatever you write on that basis.

    Why did the Grauniad sit on it for six weeks?
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486
    Whatever the strength of her argument, she has ruined it by signing off with “end of”.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117
    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    DougSeal said:

    OllyT said:

    ydoethur said:

    PB Tories not exactly lining up to defend their (mad)man.

    The police have spoken to him. He did the crime, he served his time.

    Jenrick survived so should Dom.
    Hmmm.

    While Jenrick was undoubtedly a fool, and was lucky to survive, the fact Himself was a carrier of coronavirus and had every reason to suspect he might be puts this on a different level.

    The fact that he’s a stuck up third rate Oedipus Complexer whom nobody likes isn’t exactly going to help him either.
    To be honest if he travelled 250 miles on public transport knowing he had covid he must go. No ifs or buts
    No, no, no. This sort of weakness is what debilitates governments; brashness makes them invincible. Just brush it off and say that the matter had been dealt with and is now closed. The end.
    You think all those people who have been unable to visit parents, attend funerals, see grandchildren for months are going to shrug it off because Cummings is an he's important Tory and he should be allowed to do what we can't?
    If they're not tiny babies, they'll see that he made a very natural, human mistake and will at least understand the impulse. Seeing as the police took no action against him whatsoever, it's a non-story.
    Oh come on! PB Tories have been routinely slagging their neighbours off with tales of minor lockdown naughtiness. All of a sudden, when it’s this fucker of all people, it’s a “very natural, human mistake”. It’s not like he failed to observe correct social distancing by 8 inches in Tescos. He wasn’t a bored teenager playing football in the park with his mates. He’s a senior government advisor, who helps set the policy he breached, who travelled (allegedly on public transport, on public transport FFS) from one end of England to another, at a relatively early stage in the outbreak, when he knew he was suffering from the virus, highly infectious, and part of a government that had, only a week before, told people not to do this very thing.

    I don’t give a toss if he resigns or not but people are not going to think this is a “natural, human mistake”. This guy sets policy. He will be held to a higher standard. If he stays it will damage the Government. Their call.
    The only thing that will damage the Government will be giving in to every petty Opposition demand. Time to show some strength and tell them where to stuff it.
    If Cummings is still there by the next PMQ Starmer will make mincemeat of him.
    Oh no - will Starmer also split like an amoeba and create another 164 Labour MPs? If not, he can be safely ignored for quite some time to come.
    Really? I’m reminded of the story told about the Molotov and Ribbentrop talks in Berlin in November 1940 when the latter told the former that BrItain was finished as a power, and Molotov replied by asking why then they were having the conversation in an air raid shelter? Similarly, why, if Starmer can safely be ignored, has the immigrant tax on care workers been scrapped this week?
    I've never had much belief in politicians.....but Keir has something about him...I really like him, and I've never been able to say that about any politician in my memory...doubtless he will disappoint, but at the moment he isn't....
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    It's not fake news though is it? Is that just the standard response to stuff we don't like now?

    https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1263935353834164225?s=20

    Allies and friends support their man shocker.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    DougSeal said:

    It's not fake news though is it? Is that just the standard response to stuff we don't like now?

    https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1263935353834164225?s=20

    Allies and friends support their man shocker.
    Be a turn up for the books if a newspaper sued an individual for defamation.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,259
    eadric said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    As of today, everyone I know under 40 either wants lockdown to end, or is now totally ignoring lockdown

    Lots of over-40s as well
    I'm quite a long way the wrong side of 40, indeed contemplating retirement in a few years. At least this has taught me I need to have things to do when that happens, and how long I can put up with just pottering around. Problem is I am technically higher risk: I have a congenital heart condition which normally causes me no problems at all. I think I would probably sail through it, I am fit, healthy, have a BMI under 21 and run. But I just don't know. In the short term it seems sensible to play safe, especially as most of my friends are also doing so. But it can't go on forever. At some time, I need to be able to assess that risk level.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036
    TGOHF666 said:

    DougSeal said:

    TGOHF666 said:

    Anne Franks diary would have been a short pamphlet in Durham - snitch central 🤪

    This site is full of them. The amount of moralising that goes on.
    The real scandal is the lockdown - absolute insult to freedom - man sits in car to visit parents - BURN THE WITCH.

    At least the USA has a sense of freedom left in its bones.
    Yep. That's why they are queueing round the block to buy guns and ammo.
  • Scott_xPScott_xP Posts: 36,002
    Uh oh

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1263946175817842688

    If Laura is tweeting this, just might be critical...
  • GardenwalkerGardenwalker Posts: 21,298
    edited May 2020
    Lockdown should have been released a week or so ago.

    We locked down far too late due to Boris’s laziness and some duff advice perhaps from the scientists - at the cost of several thousands of lives.

    Now we are unlocking too late, at the cost of several thousands of jobs. No wonder Rishi is on manoeuvres.

    Cummings is a sideshow, really.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695

    Scott_xP said:
    If rhe Grauniad had this story for six weeks why have they sat on it for that long?

    I think this story would have been much bigger four to six weeks ago. Vast majority of people were taking the lockdown 100% seriously then. In recent weeks its obvious that its become normal for many people to see family and friends even if its not technically allowed.

    Six weeks ago I think this story would have been outrageous, now I think it will be considered cheeky.
    I think the six week delay arises from fear of being sued if they have got it wrong.

    https://twitter.com/archiebland/status/1263940146900205569?s=20
  • BluestBlueBluestBlue Posts: 4,556
    Scott_xP said:

    Uh oh

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1263946175817842688

    If Laura is tweeting this, just might be critical...

    'Some' Tory MPs ... out of 365. Critical stuff indeed.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036
    eadric said:

    eadric said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    As of today, everyone I know under 40 either wants lockdown to end, or is now totally ignoring lockdown

    Lots of over-40s as well
    You know lots of dickheads.
    Maybe. But you don’t know many people under 40, because I’m right
    My under 40 colleagues and relatives are doing the right thing.
  • Philip_ThompsonPhilip_Thompson Posts: 65,826

    Scott_xP said:
    If rhe Grauniad had this story for six weeks why have they sat on it for that long?

    I think this story would have been much bigger four to six weeks ago. Vast majority of people were taking the lockdown 100% seriously then. In recent weeks its obvious that its become normal for many people to see family and friends even if its not technically allowed.

    Six weeks ago I think this story would have been outrageous, now I think it will be considered cheeky.
    I think the six week delay arises from fear of being sued if they have got it wrong.

    https://twitter.com/archiebland/status/1263940146900205569?s=20
    Good answer. Makes sense.
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486
    eadric said:

    Scott_xP said:
    Ooh. That’s a bigger story. if Bojo allows himself to be portrayed as Mister Lockdown, the Karen of Britain, and Quaratiner-General, he is in big big trouble.
    Sunak is right to take this on.

    It’s reasonable to allow pubs with beer gardens to open. I’d go tomorrow.
  • Scott_xP said:

    Uh oh

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1263946175817842688

    If Laura is tweeting this, just might be critical...

    Whilst I think Cummings is in trouble on this and it's a deeply damaging story, I don't think this is the reason.

    You'll always find good number of MPs willing to throw the their party leader's unelected confidant under a bus, whether it's deserved (as in this case) or not.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695
    edited May 2020

    eadric said:
    Assuming the tweeter is in the UK that moth is a very long way from home.

    I believe it is the Rosy Maple Moth whose range is normally the other side of the Atlantic.
    "...and it's ON MY DECK" probably gives it away as an American tweeter.
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    tyson said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    Exactly...you reach somewhere...and then, a nice pint (no), a meal (no), a film (no), a gig (no), a coffee (no) anything else (no).....it's time to go home.....and then same again tomorrow, and the day after
    If that's all you want then travel is pointless anyway.
    Yes...that sums it up...I Iike to walk (sometimes with the dog), listen to music and stop off for a beer, or a nice lunch, catch a movie and sleep in my own bed...and read...

    Covid 19 is only restricting a few of these options....
  • AnabobazinaAnabobazina Posts: 23,486
    The ridiculous thing is that the only place you can buy a pint is a beach bar. And it’s almost always shite, bog standard, lager. I think I got a pint of Beavertown Neck Oil in Southwold once. Otherwise, it’s Heineken.
  • TheuniondivvieTheuniondivvie Posts: 41,999
    DougSeal said:

    It's not fake news though is it? Is that just the standard response to stuff we don't like now?

    https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1263935353834164225?s=20

    Allies and friends support their man shocker.
    Yeah, but it's shite support.
    Even the pitiful 'minor transgression, natural human mistake' crap on here is better than 'stuff definitely happened but we'll call it fake news, that'll sort it'.
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695
    edited May 2020
    Just booked a transatlantic trip on QM2 for next May. Figured CV-19 will either be under control by then or the trip will be cancelled and we'll get our money back.

    Prices for the grill suites are pretty good atm.

    Brave or foolish? - time will tell.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,149
    I feel pretty confident that Dominic Cummings would agree there are situations where even where there may have been no wrongdoing, someone can foolishly do something that allows opponents, and others, to exploit that situation.

    So while the facts one way or another will affect how it will all play out (that is, it does matter what precisely was done and how), he's provided an opportunity. SirNorfolk is likely correct that there's always people willing to go after the unelected confidants (which as he noted doesn't mean it cannot be deserved) and I cannot help but think that his reported approach and attitude on his way up to his position, and how he acts while there, will be quite relevant on if, and how, he goes down.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,259

    eadric said:

    eadric said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    As of today, everyone I know under 40 either wants lockdown to end, or is now totally ignoring lockdown

    Lots of over-40s as well
    You know lots of dickheads.
    Maybe. But you don’t know many people under 40, because I’m right
    My under 40 colleagues and relatives are doing the right thing.
    Oh I'm doing the right thing. But stir crazyness is setting in.
  • SandyRentoolSandyRentool Posts: 22,036

    Just booked a transatlantic trip on QM2 for next May. Figured CV-19 will either be under control by then or the trip will be cancelled and we'll get our money back.

    Prices for the grill suites are pretty good atm.

    Brave or foolish - time will tell.

    Floating lockdown. Interesting choice!

    Night all.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,676
    OldBasing said:

    I don’t have a second home; I haven’t been able to visit my elderly widowed father for eight weeks; I have complied with the Covid-19 regulations even though I don’t like them. Why is a senior adviser to the Prime Minister allowed to travel miles and miles, whilst symptomatic, seemingly in clear breach of the law? If true, why are the rules only for us little people? That’s the dangerous element for the Government.

    I haven't seen peoples responses in this thread.

    Presume PB Tory ultras are defending the indefensible?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,149

    It's not fake news though is it? Is that just the standard response to stuff we don't like now?

    https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1263935353834164225?s=20

    Yes it is, and it's always easy to spot when it is a genuine accusation of incorrect reporting, and when it is a deflection regardless of whether something has been proven beyond a doubt.
  • DougSealDougSeal Posts: 12,541

    Scott_xP said:

    Uh oh

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1263946175817842688

    If Laura is tweeting this, just might be critical...

    'Some' Tory MPs ... out of 365. Critical stuff indeed.
    I am not sure replying to every post critical of your party with variations on the theme of “Who cares? Look at our MAHOOOSIVE majority!” will win you many arguments or converts. It may even lose you some.
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    Scott_xP said:

    Uh oh

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1263946175817842688

    If Laura is tweeting this, just might be critical...

    Today:

    a) No summer holiday abroad

    b) Members of the government could visit parents, the rest of you couldn't.
  • Ave_itAve_it Posts: 2,411

    OldBasing said:

    I don’t have a second home; I haven’t been able to visit my elderly widowed father for eight weeks; I have complied with the Covid-19 regulations even though I don’t like them. Why is a senior adviser to the Prime Minister allowed to travel miles and miles, whilst symptomatic, seemingly in clear breach of the law? If true, why are the rules only for us little people? That’s the dangerous element for the Government.

    I haven't seen peoples responses in this thread.

    Presume PB Tory ultras are defending the indefensible?
    Moderate Tories like me aren't getting too excited over this.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,149

    OldBasing said:

    I don’t have a second home; I haven’t been able to visit my elderly widowed father for eight weeks; I have complied with the Covid-19 regulations even though I don’t like them. Why is a senior adviser to the Prime Minister allowed to travel miles and miles, whilst symptomatic, seemingly in clear breach of the law? If true, why are the rules only for us little people? That’s the dangerous element for the Government.

    I haven't seen peoples responses in this thread.

    Presume PB Tory ultras are defending the indefensible?
    That is what defines an ultra, so the question is a little strange. Surely it would be whether the usually or generally loyal are doing so which would be significant?
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695

    Scott_xP said:

    Uh oh

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1263946175817842688

    If Laura is tweeting this, just might be critical...

    'Some' Tory MPs ... out of 365. Critical stuff indeed.
    Weren't 'some' Tory MPs uneasy about the NHS surcharge applying to NHS workers before that got u-turned?
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,117

    Just booked a transatlantic trip on QM2 for next May. Figured CV-19 will either be under control by then or the trip will be cancelled and we'll get our money back.

    Prices for the grill suites are pretty good atm.

    Brave or foolish? - time will tell.


    Enjoy your trip on a huge polluting hunk of metal that pollutes the oceans....

    I fucking hate cruise ships and everything about them....
  • BenpointerBenpointer Posts: 34,695

    Just booked a transatlantic trip on QM2 for next May. Figured CV-19 will either be under control by then or the trip will be cancelled and we'll get our money back.

    Prices for the grill suites are pretty good atm.

    Brave or foolish - time will tell.

    Floating lockdown. Interesting choice!

    Night all.
    Floating lockdown... with bars, restaurants and entertainment. :smile:
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,149

    DougSeal said:

    It's not fake news though is it? Is that just the standard response to stuff we don't like now?

    https://twitter.com/SebastianEPayne/status/1263935353834164225?s=20

    Allies and friends support their man shocker.
    Yeah, but it's shite support.
    Even the pitiful 'minor transgression, natural human mistake' crap on here is better than 'stuff definitely happened but we'll call it fake news, that'll sort it'.
    There will be exceptions of course, but I feel like sometimes the vague aggressiveness of a response can often be a good indicator of weakness, as positions of strength allow for an amused, confident or bland dismissal, backed with good arguments. It will be fun to see how the arguments on this one develop. Dom loves attention, we'll see what he can come up with, and how persuasively.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 59,935

    Just booked a transatlantic trip on QM2 for next May. Figured CV-19 will either be under control by then or the trip will be cancelled and we'll get our money back.

    Prices for the grill suites are pretty good atm.

    Brave or foolish? - time will tell.

    Doing your bit for the economy. I salute you. :D
  • rottenboroughrottenborough Posts: 62,766
    OldBasing said:

    I don’t have a second home; I haven’t been able to visit my elderly widowed father for eight weeks; I have complied with the Covid-19 regulations even though I don’t like them. Why is a senior adviser to the Prime Minister allowed to travel miles and miles, whilst symptomatic, seemingly in clear breach of the law? If true, why are the rules only for us little people? That’s the dangerous element for the Government.

    It's f*cking explosive.

    What I don't understand is why these people think they wont be found out?

    I sort of get an academic making a tit of himself because he probably doesn't yet realise what being in the public eye means, but Dom Cummings? Give me a break.
  • BigRichBigRich Posts: 3,492

    eadric said:

    eadric said:

    tyson said:

    eadric said:

    Sunak is the Saviour.

    Fuck lockdown. Let our people go.

    Typo in the last word there. It is d-i-e
    I think I'm with Eadric on this one....

    We have to just go for it....I think I've got eight weeks without the pub itus...fuck it. Every which way is just shit....so at least we should be able to go to the pub down some pints, and have a decent curry after....

    I'd booked tickets to Brixton Academy tonight.....I've already missed out on trips to the Etihad, New York and Italy in this period..but I think missing Hooky tonight doing Joy Division at Brixton has hit me particularly hard....
    I feel the same. I was last at work 2 months ago. I had just come back from a holiday in Cyprus so the memory of that sustained me a bit. I did lots of work round the flat, had to have a new central heating boiler installed and was buoyed up by the fact that I am no longer spending any money so could refill my savings account. I've been working from home, but that's dried up a bit. Last weekend I realised depression was starting to set in. It's not people: I'm having lots of Skype chats and don't really need to be within 2m of anyone. It's intellectual: I need to be out and about, exploring places, getting away from my own four walls and the local towns. I know I can now go out any distance for recreation, but there's nothing to do when you get there.
    As of today, everyone I know under 40 either wants lockdown to end, or is now totally ignoring lockdown

    Lots of over-40s as well
    You know lots of dickheads.
    Maybe. But you don’t know many people under 40, because I’m right
    My under 40 colleagues and relatives are doing the right thing.
    The Right thing?

    interesting expression, if they are healthy and under 40, to me the 'right thing'

    1) Standing up for freedom
    2) Going to work and keeping the economy going
    3) And if you have the balls, allowing yourself to be infected and then when you recover being part of the heard immunity. to protect the week and old.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 96,149

    Scott_xP said:

    Uh oh

    https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/1263946175817842688

    If Laura is tweeting this, just might be critical...

    'Some' Tory MPs ... out of 365. Critical stuff indeed.
    Weren't 'some' Tory MPs uneasy about the NHS surcharge applying to NHS workers before that got u-turned?
    That was just about changing a significant government policy though, not something important like being a confidant of the PM.
This discussion has been closed.