As ever at the moment politics are dominated by the continuing crisis and, of course, as its a Wednesday night time to reflect on the day’s PMQs. What is clear that Boris is facing a much more formidable opposition leader than Corbyn and he’s yet to get his measure. The PM’s position is not helped by the UK coronavirus comparisons with other nations.
Comments
https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1260680299232612352
Utter bollx:
https://twitter.com/hendopolis/status/1260678516603064321/photo/1
https://www.roche.com/media/releases/med-cor-2020-05-03.htm
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-8312771/Male-coronavirus-patients-low-testosterone-levels-likely-die-COVID-19.html
So what we are learning is we need to be on the roids while puffing away on 20 ciggies a day.
Nothing has changed in relation to the guidance offered by the various UK administrations on the provision of dentistry.
https://bda.org/advice/Coronavirus/Pages/latest-updates.aspx
Doesn't seem like anybody is going to be getting any routine treatment in the foreseeable future.
@eadric would hopefully approve of me wearing gloves and a surgical mask upon entering the pharmacy. Saw that they had yellow markings on the floor indicating 2 metre gaps, and that the counter was heavily modified with a bank-style glass or perspex screen with a small window where they hand over the prescription. I went late in the evening, and there was only one other bloke already waiting or browing possibly, but comfortably over 2 metres away.
I find it a little hard to believe. Could it possibly be true?
Oh, I have definitely had that fictionitis - last December, I'm sure I have.
Or maybe, we just haven’t got a clue.
However, it is clear from the responses from the likes of Witty, they actually don't really know what all the transmission vectors are and exactly which are more riskier than others.
They clearly think outdoors or areas with lots of ventilation are much lower risk. But beyond that there doesn't seem to be much certainty when it comes to how risky surfaces are, which types of surfaces, etc.
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/13/opinion/elizabeth-warren-vp-biden.html?action=click&module=Opinion&pgtype=Homepage
I'm not convinced. All sounds right, but what about when swing Trump supporters close their eyes and imagine Biden's health failing after a year. Will they effectively vote for Warren as POTUS?
This was extended to the “end of June” but the government’s coronavirus recovery plan released on Monday revealed it was now “likely that the government will continue to advise people who are clinically extremely vulnerable to shield beyond June”.
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/13/ministers-pressed-for-clarity-on-length-of-lockdown-for-most-vulnerable
"The list has also risen to 2.5 million because patients not on the original list approached their GP to request to go on it, often because they were scared of contracting Covid as a result of going into work.
..people are added and removed from the shielding list regularly based on their GP’s clinical judgment, as they are best placed to advise on the needs of their individual patients during this time."
https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/may/13/ministers-pressed-for-clarity-on-length-of-lockdown-for-most-vulnerable
https://twitter.com/itvpeston/status/1260695093981437952
Those who test positive will be given a verification code that must be entered into the app before it anonymously flags them as being a risk to others.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-52650576
Putting aside the Google / Apple API, the self-diagnosing aspect is of equal stupidity. I will give it less than 24hrs until some twat spends all day travelling around and around London, then in the evening claim they aren't feeling well. And 1000s of people then have to book tests / self-isolate.
But pretty much everything I am hearing is that, despite the fact that multiple transmission routes are not only possible, but probably have all happened (ocular, faecal/oral, fomites, aerosol), large droplets from people in close contact and speaking/singing (particularly speaking and singing loudly) are by far the most significant route of transmission.
I personally think that if we practiced good hand, speech and coughing/sneezing hygiene in general, and wore facemasks and practiced social distancing in indoor settings, we'd be pretty much where we need to be in lowering the R number to where it needs to be.
But that is bad news for pubs, clubs, choirs and so on.
https://twitter.com/Redistrict/status/1260675422645338116?s=20
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/05/06/upshot/pandemic-chores-homeschooling-gender.html
https://insideevs.com/news/423119/manned-drone-racing-aerobatic-video/
A boost for Trump as the District voted for Hillary in 2016.
It voted for Romney in 2012 and Obama in 2008 and was represented by a Republican until 2018 so suggests he is winning back fiscally conservative, wealthy California areas at least. While of little difference in the EC as Biden will carry California overall regardless it could boost his chances of winning the popular vote
Keir Starmer
I want to probe a little further the figures that the Prime Minister has given us. The Office for National Statistics records the average number of deaths in care homes each month. For the past five years, the average for April has been just over 8,000. This year, the number of deaths in care homes in April was a staggering 26,000. That is three times the average and an additional 18,000 deaths. Using the Government’s figures, only 8,000 are recorded as covid deaths, leaving 10,000 additional and unexplained care home deaths this April. I know that the Government must have looked into that, so can the Prime Minister give us the Government’s view on those unexplained deaths?
[Prime Minister's reply omitted]
Keir Starmer
The Prime Minister says that solving the problem in care homes is crucial, but that can happen only if the numbers are understood, so I was disappointed that he does not have an answer to the pretty obvious question: what are those 10,000 unexplained deaths?
https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2020-05-13/debates/7F8336E1-EDA2-4AF8-9923-A65B8A9B3F7E/Engagements
Under normal circumstances he would have been in hospital. Wired up to machines surrounded by family and medical professionals. He would have known he was dying. But he didn't. Due to the unusual circumstances he thought he was on holiday in Czechoslovakia...
We let him drift away.
He could have been alive next week or next month. But it was only postponement.
He died well. CV 19 is not a nice way to go.
So yeah. He's probably an excess death. But it was a kinder one. And maybe better deaths is summat we can learn from this.
I hate models like that.
Immunity fades, it does not switch off. And even if you are 80% susceptible to the disease then your symptoms are likely to be far milder due to your partial immunity.
Plus, the evidence from SARS and MERS is that antibodies are detectable (even if the numbers are much diminished) out even to 17 years.
I would not exaggerate what this means. Eric Garcetti, the Democrat Los Angeles mayor just announced that while California might be relaxing the "Stay at Home" order, Los Angeles would keep it until the end of July.
It's fair to say that this has gone down like a bucket of wet sick. (It is generally considered to be a sop to the powerful teaching unions, as the rest of California is considering starting the 2020 school year early, and the unions in LA are like "hey hey no way".)
My Dad died He would have died anyway. Price Thank you Eadric.
In a strange way it was comforting.
Just so long as he didn't die in the excruciating agony of the Rona.
I feel somewhat blessed.
That is merely one view of one "excess death "
And did they weight them properly between the states?
But no, they didn't/They just clumped the whole 15 together.