The future relationship document is 26 pages of non-binding waffle with acres of wriggle room built in. It sells no-one out because it contains no firm commitments. To get outraged by it is to reveal yourself to be someone looking for reasons to be outraged.
Exactly. A blank canvas upon which the conspiricist, the nihilist, and the downright deranged can gleefully project themselves.
*waves at grabcocque*
Beginning to think our PB legal analyst / reporter is as impartial as a Paul Mason sort of interpreter. The fake poll report and the reaction to it yesterday was a subtle hint....
I have been a lifelong Tory voter but if they don't deliver a Brexit and we end up with another referendum I will never vote for them again. Those calling for another referendum need to realise how badly that would play with leave voters from both parties.
I can't see a way forward but a split in the Tories going foward. Those looking to the future, and the ones stuck in the past.
It is impossible to see how the Tories can ever be reconciled.
Problem is that nobody knows what "leave" means so its impossible to keep everyone happy. The referendum question was clear and unambiguous - "Should the UK leave the European Union." Which is why its batshit crazy for the Chief Secretary to the Treasury to say that if we leave the EU that we haven't left the EU. If "leave means leave" then it refers to the issue on the referendum paper - the EU.
As it stands too many people have confused the question asked so that if presented with what they voted for - to leave the EU - they say "hang on, thats not leaving the EU". Which is why we need another vote. It cannot in any sane application of reason be "the will of the people" when "the people" are arguing about which will they refer to.
The UK is a democracy. Voting is democratic. To argue that voting is anti-democratic is the sign of a deranged imagination. To argue that MPs should be allowed to vote twice but not the electorate is absurd. What specifically are hardcore leavers terrified of? Its not democracy - even though having argued that power be repatriated to the UK they have screamed at the use of that power in parliament and the courts at every opportunity. No, their terror is that they are in the minority.
Like Norway, eh? That's the Norway which grants EU countries the right to fish in its waters, in exchange for access to the EU market (and vice versa)? That Norway?
Like Norway, eh? That's the Norway which grants EU countries the right to fish in its waters, in exchange for access to the EU market (and vice versa)? That Norway?
True, but also irrelevant. The narrative avalanche has started. If you squint your ears "May betrays UK fishing, gets nothing in return" is being breathed on the political winds.
True, but also irrelevant. The narrative avalanche has started. If you squint your ears "May betrays UK fishing, gets nothing in return" is being breathed on the political winds.
Quite possibly. But one doesn't need to join in the nonsense.
Hey do you think sacrificing the UK fishing industry in exchange for nothing and alienating the entire Scots Tory base as a side effect might be May's "Falklands Moment" you've been promising us?
Letter from Scots Tories to May on 14th Nov (Signed by all the Scottish Tories) says "access and quota shares cannot be included in the Future Economic Partnership”.
Have a guess what May has just done...
I assume you have a detailed knowledge of the fishing industry including access and quotas
No, but I do have the the ability to read English words and sentences, and to obtain semantic meaning from. Such as when the PD makes the FEP deal contingent on selling out fishing, when she assured Mundell, Ruth and the entire Scottish Tory party that she wasn't going to do that.
So do we. Negotiating an agreement on access is not semantically equivalent to "se;;ing out fishing" You seem desperate to push this narrative of yours. Why?
May is safe for now but if Boris is to lead the Tories into the next general election he needs enough support from MPs to get to the final two, he already leads with Tory members.
The support of Mogg should help gather right-wing MPs around him, Portillo's problem in 2001 was he was squeezed between the candidate of the left of the party, Ken Clarke and the candidate of the right of the party, IDS
True, but also irrelevant. The narrative avalanche has started. If you squint your ears "May betrays UK fishing, gets nothing in return" is being breathed on the political winds.
Quite possibly. But one doesn't need to join in the nonsense.
You keep repeating to yourself into that mirror, Richard. "This is a good deal, Richard. THIS IS A GOOD DEAL".
I have been a lifelong Tory voter but if they don't deliver a Brexit and we end up with another referendum I will never vote for them again. Those calling for another referendum need to realise how badly that would play with leave voters from both parties.
True, but also irrelevant. The narrative avalanche has started. If you squint your ears "May betrays UK fishing, gets nothing in return" is being breathed on the political winds.
Quite possibly. But one doesn't need to join in the nonsense.
Particularly when you're a Scottish Tory. This agreement can easily be sold as potential transition to "Norway". Anyway I fear it is too late, Ross Thompson has leapt onto the outrage bus without much thought as to the consequences.
I do find it hilarious that an ultra-purist like the Moggster should think it's a good idea to trust and give his support to Boris, the most slippery, changeable, untrustworthy and inconsistent man in modern politics, who has elevated betraying his friends (not to mention his wives) into an artform, and whose political positioning inasmuch as he has any is nothing like the ERG's.
I have been a lifelong Tory voter but if they don't deliver a Brexit and we end up with another referendum I will never vote for them again. Those calling for another referendum need to realise how badly that would play with leave voters from both parties.
True, but also irrelevant. The narrative avalanche has started. If you squint your ears "May betrays UK fishing, gets nothing in return" is being breathed on the political winds.
Quite possibly. But one doesn't need to join in the nonsense.
Particularly when you're a Scottish Tory. This agreement can easily be sold as potential transition to "Norway". Anyway I fear it is too late, Ross Thompson has leapt onto the outrage bus without much thought as to the consequences.
May lied to their faces only last week. Outrage is a fairly measured response.
Why is it dodgy ? Corporate types have loved to pay massive sums of money to listen to celebrity politicians spout guff since time immemorial haven't they ? I mean I think its a waste of money myself but - or is it not just spouting bullshit for 2 hours they're paying him for here ?
I expect the Commons this afternoon to be as brutal for May as it was last week. I know there has been this desperate hope expressed on here that it'll be alright on the night and Tory MPs will come back on side en masse, and that Labour Corbynphobes will get on board.
Yet in the world of realpolitique the deal gets worse and worse and worse the more the thing is scrutinised. Made even worse if thats possible by the firm mantra chanted by May that this is as Good as it Gets.
ERM loons are against it because it offers up none of the benefits they wanted and puts us in an even worse place than we are now. Remain loons are against it because it leaves us economically diplomatically and politically far worse off than we are now. General leave punters don't understand what the problem is in delivering whatever they think they voted for that wasn't on the referendum paper.
No wonder "remain" is starting to feel like a warm place to most MPs. "But the referendum!" people cry. Yes, and when both Labour and Tory parties end up at a position where remain is the Least Worst Option (and they will) then what - will the entire country vote UKIP?
Hey do you think sacrificing the UK fishing industry in exchange for nothing and alienating the entire Scots Tory base as a side effect might be May's "Falklands Moment" you've been promising us?
You know little about fishing as you have admitted. The choice here is a sensible negotiation over fishing which you need when most of your fish is sold into Europe. Nicola Sturgeon wants a Norway deal which imposes the same conditions. Or remain and nothing changes. No deal will create chaos in the north sea whivh will result in a negotiated deal or stalemate.
TM Falklands moment is to do with getting brexit over the line and if she does, her enhancing position with the electorate even more so
Why is it dodgy ? Corporate types have loved to pay massive sums of money to listen to celebrity politicians spout guff since time immemorial haven't they ? I mean I think its a waste of money myself but - or is it not just spouting bullshit for 2 hours they're paying him for here ?
Politically dodgy, especially for someone supposedly siding with the forgotten and unheard against the elite.
Any Con MP that takes May at her word is in for serious disappointment.
Truth.
But when you're a minority government trying to build a coalition of support for a dodgy deal nobody wants, and you're starting 80+ votes in the red, *my* first strategy wouldn't have been to lie to the faces of another 13 and deliberately infuriate them.
Just when the numbers to remove Theresa May were looking shaky, the PM goes fishing and lands 13 more votes....
The Tories waited 25 years to win back those seats in north-east Scotland, and fishing was one of the main issues.
Voting Tory in those seats is basically a form of self-harm. Those MPs have a mandate to screw over their constituents as much and as often as they possibly can. To do anything else would be a betrayal of their voters.
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
Bring back the days of buying a game and that's it.
Glad the rumours of the death of 2nd hand game discs haven't yet come true, at least.
As a reasonably hardcore PC gamer, I can only agree with this. These days its: 1. Release game with multiple bugs and charge full price. 2. Release 'DLC' which is effectively paid for patches to bring the game up to speed over the next 2 years.
Total cost of a 'new' game has gone from £30-£40 ten years ago to well over £100 if you buy everything on day one. That increase isn't inflation alone.
I never buy games at release anymore, and when I hear of one I might be interested in playing, I just think 'Oh, that'll interest me to buy in maybe three years time when its all patched and DLCed up'.
When TM delivers the deal to the HOC she will have achieved a divorce from the EU which a few years ago would have ERG jumping for joy. The fact that they have lost all reason and now want to stop this deal and prefer to take us into an economic wasteland is amazing. Of course no deal will be stopped and in the end if a referendum takes us back into the EU they will have committed the ultimate 'shot to the foot'
Just when the numbers to remove Theresa May were looking shaky, the PM goes fishing and lands 13 more votes....
The Tories waited 25 years to win back those seats in north-east Scotland, and fishing was one of the main issues.
Voting Tory in those seats is basically a form of self-harm. Those MPs have a mandate to screw over their constituents as much and as often as they possibly can. To do anything else would be a betrayal of their voters.
As opposed to voting Labour, LibDem, or SNP, all of whom want to keep the current arrangements for fishing?
I suppose the fact that Spain is pissed off is a good sign. On her current form, we could have woken up to the fact that May had accidentally agreed to the permanent annexation of Gibraltar by Emmanuel Macron's ego.
Bring back the days of buying a game and that's it.
Glad the rumours of the death of 2nd hand game discs haven't yet come true, at least.
As a reasonably hardcore PC gamer, I can only agree with this. These days its: 1. Release game with multiple bugs and charge full price. 2. Release 'DLC' which is effectively paid for patches to bring the game up to speed over the next 2 years.
Total cost of a 'new' game has gone from £30-£40 ten years ago to well over £100 if you buy everything on day one. That increase isn't inflation alone.
I never buy games at release anymore, and when I hear of one I might be interested in playing, I just think 'Oh, that'll interest me to buy in maybe three years time when its all patched and DLCed up'.
You missed.
0. Charge for "early access" version, which isn't even an alpha version, 2 years before actual release. ... 3. Charge extra for access to buggy and unfinished game 4 days before advertised release date. 4. Make the game such a grind to level up, that its requires either use of micotransaction purchases or 100hrs of side missions in order to be strong enough to actually progress with the main story.
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
I mean, gee, gosh. I'd love to show May how to do her fucking job for her (on current form, it'd be hard to do worse), but I already have a job, y'know.
A job I'm actually good at rather than some Prime Ministers I can mention.
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
I mean, gee, gosh. I'd love to show May how to do her fucking job for her (on current form, it'd be hard to do worse), but I already have a job, y'know.
A job I'm actually good at rather than some Prime Ministers I can mention.
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
I mean, gee, gosh. I'd love to show May how to do her fucking job for her (on current form, it'd be hard to do worse), but I already have a job, y'know.
A job I'm actually good at rather than some Prime Ministers I can mention.
Screaming about this deal, when you have no idea of the sort of deal you want - yet alone the sort of deal that is preferable or possible, is a bit ridiculous.
Norman Smith - this document is not going to win over the dads army brigade....
When did the ERG rebrand?
It does offer the prospect of a technological solution to the Irish border and no mention of the EU rulebook as part of the draft declaration on the future relationship though
May lied to your face, betrayed your constituents and now you're expected to go on TV, support the deeply problematic wording of the PD, and say "thank you Theresa please may I have another".
Imagine how little dignity and self-respect you'd have to have to be a Scots Tory giving May a pass over this.
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
He knows nothing about fishing
No, but I know a lot about when a PM is being a lying, incompetent fool and and has betrayed her own voters, party and red lines... again.
You appear to have missed a very crucial point about the political declaration.
It is not legally binding. It is a declaration of a possible route forward. It commits us to nothing as far as the future talks go and if we decide that fishing is more important than some other possible aspects of the deal then it allows us to make a stand on that point.
Now I am definitely in the camp that believes May has been entirely the wrong person to do these negotiations to date and even more so that she should not be in charge of decisions making for the trade talks after March 29th.
But to claim that something that is non binding and specifically designed to obfuscate and be everything to everyone - which is exactly what the Political Declaration is - is somehow a great betrayal, seems to be far removed from reality.
It is worth asking the other crucial question. What is the point of having all the fishing rights if you have pissed off your customers and have no where to sell them? Remember we export a large majority of our fish to the EU.
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
May lied to your face, betrayed your constituents and now you're expected to go on TV, support the deeply problematic wording of the PD, and say "thank you Theresa please may I have another".
Imagine how little dignity and self-respect you'd have to have to be a Scots Tory giving May a pass over this.
Aside from Ross and David who've come out diametrically opposed, I think they're all awaiting orders from Ruthie.
May lied to your face, betrayed your constituents and now you're expected to go on TV, support the deeply problematic wording of the PD, and say "thank you Theresa please may I have another".
Imagine how little dignity and self-respect you'd have to have to be a Scots Tory giving May a pass over this.
Aside from Ross and David who've come out diametrically opposed, I think they're all awaiting orders from Ruthie.
May lied to your face, betrayed your constituents and now you're expected to go on TV, support the deeply problematic wording of the PD, and say "thank you Theresa please may I have another".
Imagine how little dignity and self-respect you'd have to have to be a Scots Tory giving May a pass over this.
Aside from Ross and David who've come out diametrically opposed, I think they're all awaiting orders from Ruthie.
Nothing. It's clear he hasn't got the balls to do what is needful.
As I asked you below: what would your preferred position be wrt fishing? You're giving off a lot of heat over the issue, but very little light.
No idea. But I'd probably start with not lying to the faces of the people I need to back me in order to get a workable fisheries policy.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
So you've no idea what you want but you're sure this isn't it?
Theresa May's "deal" kicks all the difficult decisions to another cliff edge in 2020, when the EU will be even less willing, and us even less able, to avert disaster in good faith.
Kicking the can ever further down the road. Saving her skin one more time.
What an utter fucking shambolic shitshow of a disaster May is trying to hawk us.
This seems a good summary. Of course we'll have ranters going off half-cocked, but the emotional EU-haters were never going to be persuaded regardless.
Comments
In politics, truth is secondary to optics.
https://twitter.com/MrHarryCole/status/1065577425386569730
But sources close to Big G say that everything is fine.
I don't know who to believe...
As it stands too many people have confused the question asked so that if presented with what they voted for - to leave the EU - they say "hang on, thats not leaving the EU". Which is why we need another vote. It cannot in any sane application of reason be "the will of the people" when "the people" are arguing about which will they refer to.
The UK is a democracy. Voting is democratic. To argue that voting is anti-democratic is the sign of a deranged imagination. To argue that MPs should be allowed to vote twice but not the electorate is absurd. What specifically are hardcore leavers terrified of? Its not democracy - even though having argued that power be repatriated to the UK they have screamed at the use of that power in parliament and the courts at every opportunity. No, their terror is that they are in the minority.
What's your ideal?
You seem desperate to push this narrative of yours.
Why?
The support of Mogg should help gather right-wing MPs around him, Portillo's problem in 2001 was he was squeezed between the candidate of the left of the party, Ken Clarke and the candidate of the right of the party, IDS
https://twitter.com/theredroar/status/1065579994506846209?s=21
You're gonna get through this, I believe in you.
School > Party > Country.
Tories on 39% this week with Yougov despite UKIP on 6%, only 32% though back No Deal with Survation
Corporate types have loved to pay massive sums of money to listen to celebrity politicians spout guff since time immemorial haven't they ?
I mean I think its a waste of money myself but - or is it not just spouting bullshit for 2 hours they're paying him for here ?
Yet in the world of realpolitique the deal gets worse and worse and worse the more the thing is scrutinised. Made even worse if thats possible by the firm mantra chanted by May that this is as Good as it Gets.
ERM loons are against it because it offers up none of the benefits they wanted and puts us in an even worse place than we are now. Remain loons are against it because it leaves us economically diplomatically and politically far worse off than we are now. General leave punters don't understand what the problem is in delivering whatever they think they voted for that wasn't on the referendum paper.
No wonder "remain" is starting to feel like a warm place to most MPs. "But the referendum!" people cry. Yes, and when both Labour and Tory parties end up at a position where remain is the Least Worst Option (and they will) then what - will the entire country vote UKIP?
TM Falklands moment is to do with getting brexit over the line and if she does, her enhancing position with the electorate even more so
But when you're a minority government trying to build a coalition of support for a dodgy deal nobody wants, and you're starting 80+ votes in the red, *my* first strategy wouldn't have been to lie to the faces of another 13 and deliberately infuriate them.
But hey, I do me and you do you, Mrs M.
I'd certainly want to stick to May's red line (PBUH) that an independent fisheries policy cannot be contingent on a future trade deal. And certainly will not guarantee EU fleets future preferential access in exchange for being allowed a trade deal.
The UK needs to become an independent coastal nation, and if Macron and May think they can hold UK fisheries hostage during trade negotiations to prevent that then they can fuck right off.
1. Release game with multiple bugs and charge full price.
2. Release 'DLC' which is effectively paid for patches to bring the game up to speed over the next 2 years.
Total cost of a 'new' game has gone from £30-£40 ten years ago to well over £100 if you buy everything on day one. That increase isn't inflation alone.
I never buy games at release anymore, and when I hear of one I might be interested in playing, I just think 'Oh, that'll interest me to buy in maybe three years time when its all patched and DLCed up'.
https://twitter.com/SkyNewsBreak/status/1065585009162153984
0. Charge for "early access" version, which isn't even an alpha version, 2 years before actual release.
...
3. Charge extra for access to buggy and unfinished game 4 days before advertised release date.
4. Make the game such a grind to level up, that its requires either use of micotransaction purchases or 100hrs of side missions in order to be strong enough to actually progress with the main story.
We have said we're going to come up with a fishing agreement. So have the EU. Have they surrendered as well?
A job I'm actually good at rather than some Prime Ministers I can mention.
https://twitter.com/Steven_Swinford/status/1065585595391586305
When did the ERG rebrand?
Hopeless.
NOTHING HAS CHANGED.
Two great constants in these unsettled times.
No incentive for a deal for the EU no 23821
https://twitter.com/STVNews/status/1065586584374964224
Imagine how little dignity and self-respect you'd have to have to be a Scots Tory giving May a pass over this.
It is not legally binding. It is a declaration of a possible route forward. It commits us to nothing as far as the future talks go and if we decide that fishing is more important than some other possible aspects of the deal then it allows us to make a stand on that point.
Now I am definitely in the camp that believes May has been entirely the wrong person to do these negotiations to date and even more so that she should not be in charge of decisions making for the trade talks after March 29th.
But to claim that something that is non binding and specifically designed to obfuscate and be everything to everyone - which is exactly what the Political Declaration is - is somehow a great betrayal, seems to be far removed from reality.
It is worth asking the other crucial question. What is the point of having all the fishing rights if you have pissed off your customers and have no where to sell them? Remember we export a large majority of our fish to the EU.
Radicals and One Nation vs the Ultras
Edit: With the possible exception of NI, which will maintain SM access. not sure.
May needs a *lot* of holding to account.
I do not think she will worry too much about your views
You wanted to throw a blanket over it.
We are starting the messy business of clearing it up.
https://twitter.com/RossThomson_MP/status/1065589833593208833
Kicking the can ever further down the road. Saving her skin one more time.
What an utter fucking shambolic shitshow of a disaster May is trying to hawk us.
https://twitter.com/HenryNewman/status/1065567579668971521
https://twitter.com/HenryNewman/status/1065567582504345600
https://twitter.com/HenryNewman/status/1065567584312008704