politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Populus and Survation had almost the same raw figures for UKIP support yet their headline numbers were very different
Both Populus and Survation operate in a very similar manner. Both do their fieldwork online, both weight for likely turnout, and both apply a formula to ensure that their samples are politically balanced.
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
IANAE, despite the attempts of many on here over the years to fill my pit of ignorance but am I not right in thinking that companies such as Populus weigh certainty to vote on the back of past voting activity?
Given that UKIP got about 3% last time out such an approach is always going to significantly reduce their assessed performance. Those that don't past weigh in that way will no doubt reflect the current puff but pollsters who have been around for a while have excellent reasons to use past voting. It works.
Whether it works as well for new kids on the block as it does for existing parties will be determined at the next election. My guess is that it will but it is clearly a bigger challenge for a pollster to get right than a movement between the established parties.
Last time I checked ICM or might have been Ipsos phone survey there was very little adjustment from raw data to headline intention. Self selecting surveys that feel they need to adjust data so much are not worth as much in my book as a randomly seeded mobile number survey. 94% of adults have a mobile http://www.mobilemastinfo.com/stats-and-facts/ so the odds of obtaining a truly random sample from randomly picking say 1500 numbers are going to be pretty good. Landline surveys will probably be worse I'd say now as for instance I simply don't use one nor have it plugged in at my home during the day (Anecdotal, sample size 1 etc) but I think alot of people probably just use mobiles and have the internet plugged straight into the wall...
Does any polling company use a random seed generator of mobile numbers for it's surveys ?
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
Netherlands has the advantage of being very flat though, making building easy and land usable. If you stripped out the land scale which wasn't suitable for building (a large proportion of Wales and Scotland for example), then the figures would be a little different.
For example the South East of England has a population density of 1,170 per square km.. compared with Netherlands of 1,048.
A meaningless statement as not all people polled are equal, and nor do they fit comfortably into demographics.
As OGH said:
Both Populus and Survation operate in a very similar manner. Both do their fieldwork online, both weight for likely turnout
So any differences in their sample, etc, should be random, and cancel out other time, but instead we have a systematic difference, which can only be attributable to the different weighting formulas applied in an attempt to be sure that they have a politically representative sample.
The question this raises is: Which approach is right?
I suspect that past vote recall is imperfect, though with an online panel you could at least poll people shortly after the general election itself, and use those responses to weight your sample, thus improving the accuracy.
The "closely identified with" question is, in my opinion, highly suspect, as it is asking the respondent to treat something as being fixed and unchanging which really isn't. People do change their political allegiances, and asking them to pretend that they haven't is asking for trouble in my opinion.
IANAE, despite the attempts of many on here over the years to fill my pit of ignorance but am I not right in thinking that companies such as Populus weigh certainty to vote on the back of past voting activity?
Given that UKIP got about 3% last time out such an approach is always going to significantly reduce their assessed performance. Those that don't past weigh in that way will no doubt reflect the current puff but pollsters who have been around for a while have excellent reasons to use past voting. It works.
Whether it works as well for new kids on the block as it does for existing parties will be determined at the next election. My guess is that it will but it is clearly a bigger challenge for a pollster to get right than a movement between the established parties.
As Mike says in the thread header , Populus weight by Party ID not Past Vote ,
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.
Last time I checked ICM or might have been Ipsos phone survey there was very little adjustment from raw data to headline intention. Self selecting surveys that feel they need to adjust data so much are not worth as much in my book as a randomly seeded mobile number survey. 94% of adults have a mobile http://www.mobilemastinfo.com/stats-and-facts/ so the odds of obtaining a truly random sample from randomly picking say 1500 numbers are going to be pretty good. Landline surveys will probably be worse I'd say now as for instance I simply don't use one nor have it plugged in at my home during the day (Anecdotal, sample size 1 etc) but I think alot of people probably just use mobiles and have the internet plugged straight into the wall...
Does any polling company use a random seed generator of mobile numbers for it's surveys ?
ICM has been polling mobiles as well as landlines since March 2012. In that sense it has a greater reach than other firms.
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.
If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums
And how much stuff does Guernsey need to import?.... rather a lot I'd imagine, unless you think they live off butter and potatoes (wait that's Jersey....).
IANAE, despite the attempts of many on here over the years to fill my pit of ignorance but am I not right in thinking that companies such as Populus weigh certainty to vote on the back of past voting activity?
Given that UKIP got about 3% last time out such an approach is always going to significantly reduce their assessed performance. Those that don't past weigh in that way will no doubt reflect the current puff but pollsters who have been around for a while have excellent reasons to use past voting. It works.
Whether it works as well for new kids on the block as it does for existing parties will be determined at the next election. My guess is that it will but it is clearly a bigger challenge for a pollster to get right than a movement between the established parties.
Yep, General Election Voting Intention polling is already a tricky thing to get right, as you can only test your methods once every four or five years. Which is never going to provide a big enough sample size to be certain of your methodology.
Then you throw in new political dynamics like Coalition government, and the rise of UKIP, and it's even more pays your money, takes your choice.
Still, it's the best guide to the electoral landscape that we have. And of course trends are always informative.
"She was unveiled as the new face of the RSPB this weekend.
But its more than one million members might be surprised to learn that Miranda Krestovnikoff, the BBC broadcaster, is championing the eating of some of Britain’s wildlife — more precisely, roadkill. The presenter has told how she wants more people to source their meat not from a local supermarket or specialist butchers, but rather, from the roadside.
She spoke after hosting a dinner party for friends featuring rat — fried and served with a garlic and soy sauce dip — from the B3347 near Sopley in the New Forest; fox, sautéd in garlic, from the Ferndown bypass, near Wimborne, Dorset; and badger chasseur, served with tomato sauce and croutons, picked up from the A354 near Salisbury.
"We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election. It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.
If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums
LOL. Excellent trolling. Getting lots of bites, I see.
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.
If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums
With birth rates and even more immigration when we hit 120m,it won,t be to long before we get 195m and this is little England we are posting about - just total madness.
I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..
Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....
"We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election. It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;
"President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "
I suspect Populus is more right than Survation, for two reasons:
a) Populus is well-respected political pollster, and they ran their on-line surveys for a couple of years before switching, refining their weightings to match the phone polls.
b) It is well-known that on-line panels are very prone to self-selection bias (supporters who are fired up are disproportionately likely to respond), and we know that Kippers are fired up with their (admittedly rather quaint) view that UKIP represents something new and exciting. Therefore one would definitely expect that the UKIP score should be weighted downwards in any online poll; one can argue about how much it should be weighted down by, but it streteches credulity to see that Survation actually weighted the raw UKIP number up.
I have no idea how Survation can UP the UKIP vote share tbh. ICM seems pretty good, is the October one due out soon ?
One thing, if I was ICM I'd up the proportion of mobile seeds to landline
Although AFAIK ICM have not published anything I am sure that they are monitoring whether there is a difference in responses for landlines and mobiles and will change the proportions if necessary .
I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..
Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....
Nice work at the taxpayers teet -
The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.
If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.
If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums
With birth rates and even more immigration when we hit 120m,it won,t be to long before we get 195m and this is little England we are posting about - just total madness.
If we had the same population density as Singapore we'd have 1.8 Billion people, with all the crime and poverty that Singapore is notorious for.
Oh sh!t,tim talking in billions now,I have to lay down ;-)
I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..
Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....
Nice work at the taxpayers teet -
The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.
If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.
If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.
What I love most about the absurd Labourite thinking is that unless we are the most densely populated nation we are somehow Little Englanders and if we don't have a national debt as big as we did after fighting a 6yrs World War our finances are tickety-boo.
It's hilarious - who do they think falls for this stuff?
What I love most about the absurd Labourite thinking is that unless we are the most densely populated nation we are somehow Little Englanders and if we don't have a national debt as big as we did after fighting a 6yrs World War our finances are tickety-boo.
It's hilarious - who do they think falls for this stuff?
Why do you make these things up about "Labourite thinking"?
It's not hilarious that you do so, but it is rather peculiar!
I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..
What I love most about the absurd Labourite thinking is that unless we are the most densely populated nation we are somehow Little Englanders and if we don't have a national debt as big as we did after fighting a 6yrs World War our
finances are tickety-boo.
It's hilarious - who do they think falls for this stuff?
I know,some of these people plato belong to the real fruit & nut party.
I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..
Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....
Nice work at the taxpayers teet -
The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.
If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.
If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.
Sorry, I thought you were interested in a serious discussion. Now I understand that it comes down to your belief that because the BBC does not always report the news in the way you would like it to be reported it is a big anti-Tory conspiracy. I imagine that Flanders' notorious left-wing views are why the famously Marxist JP Morgan have trebled her salary to £400,000 pa.
I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..
Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....
Nice work at the taxpayers teet -
The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.
If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.
If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.
Lol - agreed. I believe she was an ex squeeze of Miliband and Balls which are 2 squeezes more than anyone needs on an economics cv.
"I might add that the Front is nothing like Ukip, a mostly pro-American, Right-leaning, libertarian, anti-welfare, free-market party. Marine Le Pen is an ardent defender of the French welfare model. Her critique of capitalism gives her a Leftist hue. Some call it 1930s national socialism, and here we are starting to touch on the populist appeal. She fulminates against Washington and Nato, calling for France to retake its place as "non-aligned" voice in a multipolar world, and lashing out at the Gaulliste UMP for selling its soul to Europe and the Anglo-Saxon order."
So it would be unwise to read-across Front success in France to UKIP success in the UK - in particular where its support comes from.....
"We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election. It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;
"President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "
Tragically for AEP, the Socialists did not actually field a candidate in the election. But never mind!
From Table 1. Unweighted C1s and C2s = 336, Weighted C1s and C2s = 501. That's quite a lot of weighting.
It's the C2s I'd be particularly worried by. The voting intentions of C2 voters are based on an unweighted base of 131 respondents, weighted up to 210. They split 17% Labour to 10% Conservative, compared to 29-37 in 2010. They have one of the highest rates of don't knows, at 30%.
And then, of course, one is left to consider what fraction of the sample actually lives in the Middle England Towns and Their Hinterlands, where the election will be decided. I'm continually amazed that pollsters manage to do so well, to be honest.
If we had the same population density as Monaco we'd have 4.2 Billion people and all the deprivation, slums and shanty towns that people fear in that hellhole.
I'd stick to Guernsey if I were you. That was almost funny. Now you are just flogging the joke into extiction
If we had the same population density as Monaco we'd have 4.2 Billion people and all the deprivation, slums and shanty towns that people fear in that hellhole.
So you'd be happy for us to convert to a entirely service economy based on the rich.. with no place for poor people
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
Hello Pulpstar, RichardNabavi, Mark Senior. The reason why the UKIP figure went up after weighting is pretty straightforward. Firstly you'll see that the raw figures were underweight the 55+ age group, which is UKIP's strongest group so weighting the sample took them up.
Secondly like ICM we weight by likelihood to vote, and UKIP voters have a high LTV so would go up on that also.
There is also an adjustment for DK/REF (like ICM) which took the UKIP figure LOWER in a final step.
If we had the same population density as France, where people are so upset by immigration they're voting in droves for the FN, we'd have a population of under 28.5m
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..
Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....
Nice work at the taxpayers teet -
The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.
If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.
If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.
Just so long as you don't pay in to a bloated charity such as those infesting the worlds of private health and private education.
Private schools ? I would if I had the cash. Private health - well of course - those nice chaps at Bupa get me up the old queue for an op when required :
clear the proles - fee payer coming into the operating theatre.."
Hello Pulpstar, RichardNabavi, Mark Senior. The reason why the UKIP figure went up after weighting is pretty straightforward. Firstly you'll see that the raw figures were underweight the 55+ age group, which is UKIP's strongest group so weighting the sample took them up. .
Thanks for the response, much appreciated. I take the point on the age weighting, that's fair enough.
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
Hello Pulpstar, RichardNabavi, Mark Senior. The reason why the UKIP figure went up after weighting is pretty straightforward. Firstly you'll see that the raw figures were underweight the 55+ age group, which is UKIP's strongest group so weighting the sample took them up.
Secondly like ICM we weight by likelihood to vote, and UKIP voters have a high LTV so would go up on that also.
There is also an adjustment for DK/REF (like ICM) which took the UKIP figure LOWER in a final step.
Thanks for taking the trouble to post this explanation
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
WRT the French news, the Socialists backed a Communist ally. That candidate failed to make the run off then you had the wonderful sight of the Socialists running around trying to convince people to support the UMP.
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
"We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election. It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;
"President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "
I found that part of the article particularly ignorant. The Socialists didnt stand in the first round...
"We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election. It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;
"President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "
Tragically for AEP, the Socialists did not actually field a candidate in the election. But never mind!
SO , merde.
Carratala was the PS proxy. He had their support , he was their candidate.
" Lopez came in first in the initial round of voting October 6, receiving 40.4 percent of the vote in an election in which 66.65 percent of the town’s 20,728 registered voters abstained. PCF candidate Laurent Carratala, supported by the PS and the petty-bourgeois “left”, finished a humiliating third, with 14.6 percent, and was eliminated from the second round. "
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
"We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election. It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;
"President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "
Tragically for AEP, the Socialists did not actually field a candidate in the election. But never mind!
SO , merde.
Carratala was the PS proxy. He had their support , he was their candidate.
" Lopez came in first in the initial round of voting October 6, receiving 40.4 percent of the vote in an election in which 66.65 percent of the town’s 20,728 registered voters abstained. PCF candidate Laurent Carratala, supported by the PS and the petty-bourgeois “left”, finished a humiliating third, with 14.6 percent, and was eliminated from the second round. "
Non
The statement "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round" is just plain wrong, I'm afraid.
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
Mark Denten @BBCMarkDenten Work and Pensions Sec Iain Duncan Smith says Labour "carping about the benefits cap" when many working people don't earn that much
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
And then, of course, one is left to consider what fraction of the sample actually lives in the Middle England Towns and Their Hinterlands, where the election will be decided. I'm continually amazed that pollsters manage to do so well, to be honest.
This is why Ashcroft's marginal polls are a godsend for GE predictions.
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.
That e-fit is bizarre-one guy, 2 different faces. I reckon I work with both of them, in fact I went cycling with the chubby one this morning. Is there a reward?
The best thing about that article is Comments Are Closed. Its all terribly tragic for her parents but my sympathy ran out several yrs ago since when a hundred or more kids have gone missing or been assumed murdered like April Jones and there's not been 1/10th of the media mania around them.
At the end of day - the McCanns went socialising with their friends whilst their toddler was alone.
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.
Bollocks,the bbc thought harper would come on and backtrack when facing a failed asylum seeker.
That's right. Off to feed my flying pigs now ...
Tykejohnno is almost certainly right. I know how TV producers think, seeing as I have lots of TV producer friends. They wanted the minister to be humiliated/embarrassed by a real live suffering asylum seeker.
Yes, I think Harper handled what had been set up as an ambush well.....
The best thing about that article is Comments Are Closed. Its all terribly tragic for her parents but my sympathy ran out several yrs ago since when a hundred or more kids have gone missing or been assumed murdered like April Jones and there's not been 1/10th of the media mania around them.
At the end of day - the McCanns went socialising with their friends whilst their toddler was alone.
To be fair, cases like April Jones do get a lot(rightly) of media interest. I can't blame the McCann's for doing their utmost to find out what happened to their daughter, I'd be the same. Leaving the children alone, whilst the adults went out, was certainly a questionable decision, but that shouldn't mean that finding out what happened isn't important.
No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.
Isn't that because hardly anyone identified with Ukip in 2010?
Mark Denten @BBCMarkDenten Work and Pensions Sec Iain Duncan Smith says Labour "carping about the benefits cap" when many working people don't earn that much
Most people in work are doing OK, so Labour don't really claim to support them.
IDS: In every programme we've got we're driving costs down. Labour OPPOSED every single one of £83 BILLION of welfare budget savings #DWPqs
I thought Labour were ridiculous when they announced the compounded increase in spending over three years for Health, back in the late 90s. I remember it causing a bit of a fuss at the time, with the Opposition complaining that they should not mislead people by adding together three years in such a way.
How many years has IDS added together to reach his absurd figure of £83 billion?
Dopey IDS is going to be outflanked and he's too busy trying to understand the faulty roll out of Universal Credit across Ashton Under Lyme to realise it.
@TelePolitics: Blog: Labour's new plans to dismantle the welfare system make IDS look like a wimp. The Left will be furious http://t.co/ulyr9icxVL
But then again he doesn't understand why he's presided over a rise in welfare spending either
To be outflanked you need something on your flank - not a wishy washy promise to spend the bonus tax for the 13th time with a mythical forced hard labour regime.
IDS: In every programme we've got we're driving costs down. Labour OPPOSED every single one of £83 BILLION of welfare budget savings #DWPqs
Sigh. IDS has problems with numbers in the same way that Gordon Brown did. Double and treble counting. Whilst I agree with the sentiment he should stop saying such ridiculous things.
Um, sorry to be a bit rubbish, but can someone offer me more advice on Royal Mail shares?
I want to sell mine tomorrow, but I don't know where the F they are, let alone how to sell them. The Royal Mail has taken my £5k from my account, not replied, given no explanation what to do, not refunded my unused £4.3k, and all I have is a "share offer number".
Duh.
You should have received a share certificate. It has probably got lost in the post. Why not try Royal Mail's online Track and Trace service?
Um, sorry to be a bit rubbish, but can someone offer me more advice on Royal Mail shares?
I want to sell mine tomorrow, but I don't know where the F they are, let alone how to sell them. The Royal Mail has taken my £5k from my account, not replied, given no explanation what to do, not refunded my unused £4.3k, and all I have is a "share offer number".
Duh.
They are all at the share depositary in Lagos and you will shortly be contacted by email with a tremendous opportunity to increase your holding.
Yes Millsy, that's correct. Under this method UKIP could get more popular and established but the headline figure could actually go LOWER. As more of the sample said they "identified" with UKIP they would join the "reduce to 1%" group.
Um, sorry to be a bit rubbish, but can someone offer me more advice on Royal Mail shares?
I want to sell mine tomorrow, but I don't know where the F they are, let alone how to sell them. The Royal Mail has taken my £5k from my account, not replied, given no explanation what to do, not refunded my unused £4.3k, and all I have is a "share offer number".
Duh.
You should have received a share certificate. It has probably got lost in the post. Why not try Royal Mail's online Track and Trace service?
Or you could just contact a broker - Hargreaves Lansdown @ £11.95 per trade is probably the best bet. Some online services (e.g. www.x-o.co.uk) offer cheaper transaction fees but require you to pay an annual subscription fee. Worth it if you intend to stag other IPOs or trade shares you currently hold but not for a one off.
You can trade without the certificate. The Share Certificate number and personal ID are the key.
Is there not an online, special reduced commission arrangement in place for those who don't want to be long term investors in a strike ridden, overmanned cess pit with considerable structural disadvantages and ever more competitors?
I am still trying to make up my mind. The short term dividends promised are a lot better than deposit accounts.
No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.
I hope you are right on UKIP as it would mean my 2 GE seat bet would be likely. I suspect you are wrong
Survation don't just weight by past vote: "Data is weighted to the profile of all adults aged 18+. Data is weighted by gender, age, region and pastvote. Targets for the weighted data are derived from Office of National Statistics, 2011 Census data andthe results of the 2010 General Election"
For the many many pb-ers enthralled by my tales from the Frankfurt Book Fair, I can report that the German auction of my thriller is still ongoing. We're now up to €45k with four publishers left in the race.
It's like an exciting horse race over fences but conducted in very slow motion underwater, where everyone keeps having enormous boozy lunches between hurdles.
Oh I forgot to say that the balance of the £5,000 you deposited with the government's agents will be returned to you after it is no longer needed to eliminate the annual deficit.
George Osborne tweets from China that the delay will be a maximum of 13 working days.
Sunny Hundal @sunny_hundal 7m So while visitors from India (our 2nd biggest investors) have to pay £3k bond to visit, Chinese get unlimited visas? Indians will be furious
The people that China let out of China are highly likely to go back home. The same is not true for Indians. It's a fair solution. Especially since the Indian government decided to up the Visa charge for UK nationals from ~£40 to ~£90 for a visitor visa.
I can see Narendra Modi making moves to cool the tension between the UK and India when it comes to border control, but he has to win first. If the UPA win again then it's only going to get worse as India will continue to export their poor and unemployed to neighbouring countries and nations with lax border controls.
James Chapman tweets: "Esther McVey overshadowed opening IDS/Reeves skirmishes - quite the star of the show at #DWPQs. Startling improvement at the despatch box"
Oh I forgot to say that the balance of the £5,000 you deposited with the government's agents will be returned to you after it is no longer needed to eliminate the annual deficit.
I heard it was being distributed to the top 10 lefty charities as voted for by Guardian readers.
Is there not an online, special reduced commission arrangement in place for those who don't want to be long term investors in a strike ridden, overmanned cess pit with considerable structural disadvantages and ever more competitors?
I am still trying to make up my mind. The short term dividends promised are a lot better than deposit accounts.
Question is whether you want to hold £1000 in a single stock. More most people this will either be too much or too little.
Mr. Max, those are good points on India and China. They're very different bags of monkeys.
In Malaysia a court has ruled Christians cannot refer to their god as Allah (apparently this has happened for ages there), only Muslims can: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24516181
This reminds me, writ small, of the story I heard about the Coptic Pope in Egypt being forced to appear on TV and disagree with one of his own bishops, who asserted that (in essence) Christianity was right and Islam was wrong [it was a matter of history].
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV
Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.
Bollocks,the bbc thought harper would come on and backtrack when facing a failed asylum seeker.
That's right. Off to feed my flying pigs now ...
Tykejohnno is almost certainly right. I know how TV producers think, seeing as I have lots of TV producer friends. They wanted the minister to be humiliated/embarrassed by a real live suffering asylum seeker.
I suspect that what they wanted is what they got - compelling television.
No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.
The main problem which you have not addressed here is the fact that Online pollsters find more UKIP supporters in the first place than telephone pollsters , This is particularly true of Comres who carry out both types of polling . This fundamental difference is then masked somewhat by some of the Online pollsters such as Populus and to a lesser extent Yougov by severe Party ID weighting . Now you may argue that their weighting in this way is unjustified or too harsh but you have not answered the basic discrepancy between online and telephone polling results .
Sunny Hundal @sunny_hundal 7m So while visitors from India (our 2nd biggest investors) have to pay £3k bond to visit, Chinese get unlimited visas? Indians will be furious
The people that China let out of China are highly likely to go back home. The same is not true for Indians. It's a fair solution. Especially since the Indian government decided to up the Visa charge for UK nationals from ~£40 to ~£90 for a visitor visa.
I can see Narendra Modi making moves to cool the tension between the UK and India when it comes to border control, but he has to win first. If the UPA win again then it's only going to get worse as India will continue to export their poor and unemployed to neighbouring countries and nations with lax border controls.
India's poor are stuck in India, living on its streets and in its slums. They certainly don't have close to enough money to buy plane tickets to fly all the way to the UK.
James Chapman tweets: "Esther McVey overshadowed opening IDS/Reeves skirmishes - quite the star of the show at #DWPQs. Startling improvement at the despatch box"
In marked contradistinction to Meg Hillier who got an absolute shellacking on DP today on Free Schools.
Comments
I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
That's two lefty posts from you today Sean. Are you feeling alright?
Given that UKIP got about 3% last time out such an approach is always going to significantly reduce their assessed performance. Those that don't past weigh in that way will no doubt reflect the current puff but pollsters who have been around for a while have excellent reasons to use past voting. It works.
Whether it works as well for new kids on the block as it does for existing parties will be determined at the next election. My guess is that it will but it is clearly a bigger challenge for a pollster to get right than a movement between the established parties.
Self selecting surveys that feel they need to adjust data so much are not worth as much in my book as a randomly seeded mobile number survey. 94% of adults have a mobile http://www.mobilemastinfo.com/stats-and-facts/ so the odds of obtaining a truly random sample from randomly picking say 1500 numbers are going to be pretty good.
Landline surveys will probably be worse I'd say now as for instance I simply don't use one nor have it plugged in at my home during the day (Anecdotal, sample size 1 etc) but I think alot of people probably just use mobiles and have the internet plugged straight into the wall...
Does any polling company use a random seed generator of mobile numbers for it's surveys ?
For example the South East of England has a population density of 1,170 per square km.. compared with Netherlands of 1,048.
The question this raises is: Which approach is right?
I suspect that past vote recall is imperfect, though with an online panel you could at least poll people shortly after the general election itself, and use those responses to weight your sample, thus improving the accuracy.
The "closely identified with" question is, in my opinion, highly suspect, as it is asking the respondent to treat something as being fixed and unchanging which really isn't. People do change their political allegiances, and asking them to pretend that they haven't is asking for trouble in my opinion.
Then you throw in new political dynamics like Coalition government, and the rise of UKIP, and it's even more pays your money, takes your choice.
Still, it's the best guide to the electoral landscape that we have. And of course trends are always informative.
"She was unveiled as the new face of the RSPB this weekend.
But its more than one million members might be surprised to learn that Miranda Krestovnikoff, the BBC broadcaster, is championing the eating of some of Britain’s wildlife — more precisely, roadkill. The presenter has told how she wants more people to source their meat not from a local supermarket or specialist butchers, but rather, from the roadside.
She spoke after hosting a dinner party for friends featuring rat — fried and served with a garlic and soy sauce dip — from the B3347 near Sopley in the New Forest; fox, sautéd in garlic, from the Ferndown bypass, near Wimborne, Dorset; and badger chasseur, served with tomato sauce and croutons, picked up from the A354 near Salisbury.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100025783/time-to-take-bets-on-frexit-and-the-french-franc/
"We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election.
It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
I have no idea how Survation can UP the UKIP vote share tbh. ICM seems pretty good, is the October one due out soon ?
One thing, if I was ICM I'd up the proportion of mobile seeds to landline
Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....
Nice work at the taxpayers teet -
Something tells me that all this discussion about roadkill, will merely bring back the busty girls in tight t shirts on PB's advertising.
+1000.
"President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "
a) Populus is well-respected political pollster, and they ran their on-line surveys for a couple of years before switching, refining their weightings to match the phone polls.
b) It is well-known that on-line panels are very prone to self-selection bias (supporters who are fired up are disproportionately likely to respond), and we know that Kippers are fired up with their (admittedly rather quaint) view that UKIP represents something new and exciting. Therefore one would definitely expect that the UKIP score should be weighted downwards in any online poll; one can argue about how much it should be weighted down by, but it streteches credulity to see that Survation actually weighted the raw UKIP number up.
If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.
It's hilarious - who do they think falls for this stuff?
It's not hilarious that you do so, but it is rather peculiar!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hKjPosgpxlw
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/10367545/Did-Stephanie-Flanders-flee-the-BBC-because-of-James-Harding.html
"I might add that the Front is nothing like Ukip, a mostly pro-American, Right-leaning, libertarian, anti-welfare, free-market party. Marine Le Pen is an ardent defender of the French welfare model. Her critique of capitalism gives her a Leftist hue. Some call it 1930s national socialism, and here we are starting to touch on the populist appeal. She fulminates against Washington and Nato, calling for France to retake its place as "non-aligned" voice in a multipolar world, and lashing out at the Gaulliste UMP for selling its soul to Europe and the Anglo-Saxon order."
So it would be unwise to read-across Front success in France to UKIP success in the UK - in particular where its support comes from.....
It's the C2s I'd be particularly worried by. The voting intentions of C2 voters are based on an unweighted base of 131 respondents, weighted up to 210. They split 17% Labour to 10% Conservative, compared to 29-37 in 2010. They have one of the highest rates of don't knows, at 30%.
And then, of course, one is left to consider what fraction of the sample actually lives in the Middle England Towns and Their Hinterlands, where the election will be decided. I'm continually amazed that pollsters manage to do so well, to be honest.
Hmmm interesting.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html
Secondly like ICM we weight by likelihood to vote, and UKIP voters have a high LTV so would go up on that also.
There is also an adjustment for DK/REF (like ICM) which took the UKIP figure LOWER in a final step.
clear the proles - fee payer coming into the operating theatre.."
Oh France.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/
Carratala was the PS proxy. He had their support , he was their candidate.
" Lopez came in first in the initial round of voting October 6, receiving 40.4 percent of the vote in an election in which 66.65 percent of the town’s 20,728 registered voters abstained. PCF candidate Laurent Carratala, supported by the PS and the petty-bourgeois “left”, finished a humiliating third, with 14.6 percent, and was eliminated from the second round. "
That's a sticker.
The statement "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round" is just plain wrong, I'm afraid.
Bravo to the Home Office.
We now need to set a 'Bad Brother' TV in an asylum seekers hostel and let the real Brits decide who goes next.
Mark Denten @BBCMarkDenten
Work and Pensions Sec Iain Duncan Smith says Labour "carping about the benefits cap" when many working people don't earn that much
This is why Ashcroft's marginal polls are a godsend for GE predictions.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/danhodges/100241245/madeleine-mccann-the-police-are-hunting-for-a-needle-in-a-haystack-should-we-really-be-drawn-into-this-circus/
At the end of day - the McCanns went socialising with their friends whilst their toddler was alone.
Leaving the children alone, whilst the adults went out, was certainly a questionable decision, but that shouldn't mean that finding out what happened isn't important.
Labour - the party of the shirking class.
How many years has IDS added together to reach his absurd figure of £83 billion?
You can trade without the certificate. The Share Certificate number and personal ID are the key.
I am still trying to make up my mind. The short term dividends promised are a lot better than deposit accounts.
"Data is weighted to the profile of all adults aged 18+. Data is weighted by gender, age, region and pastvote. Targets for the weighted data are derived from Office of National Statistics, 2011 Census data andthe results of the 2010 General Election"
http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UbL-oAqy1aAJ:survation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Data-Collection-Method.pdf
Oh I forgot to say that the balance of the £5,000 you deposited with the government's agents will be returned to you after it is no longer needed to eliminate the annual deficit.
George Osborne tweets from China that the delay will be a maximum of 13 working days.
I can see Narendra Modi making moves to cool the tension between the UK and India when it comes to border control, but he has to win first. If the UPA win again then it's only going to get worse as India will continue to export their poor and unemployed to neighbouring countries and nations with lax border controls.
Follow the money...
Mr. Max, those are good points on India and China. They're very different bags of monkeys.
In Malaysia a court has ruled Christians cannot refer to their god as Allah (apparently this has happened for ages there), only Muslims can:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24516181
This reminds me, writ small, of the story I heard about the Coptic Pope in Egypt being forced to appear on TV and disagree with one of his own bishops, who asserted that (in essence) Christianity was right and Islam was wrong [it was a matter of history].
I don't think anyone will try this, but it'd be fascinating to try and correlate favourite book genres and voting intentions.
Very amusing it was, too.