Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Populus and Survation had almost the same raw figures for U

SystemSystem Posts: 12,250
edited October 2013 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Populus and Survation had almost the same raw figures for UKIP support yet their headline numbers were very different

Both Populus and Survation operate in a very similar manner. Both do their fieldwork online, both weight for likely turnout, and both apply a formula to ensure that their samples are politically balanced.

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    A meaningless statement as not all people polled are equal, and nor do they fit comfortably into demographics.
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    FPT-

    I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    FPT
    SeanT said:

    No head of a charity should make more than £100k. If they do, take away their charitable status.

    The head of Eton college is paid more than £200,000. I think you'd find a lot of lefties who supported taking away Eton's charitable status.

    That's two lefty posts from you today Sean. Are you feeling alright?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,192
    IANAE, despite the attempts of many on here over the years to fill my pit of ignorance but am I not right in thinking that companies such as Populus weigh certainty to vote on the back of past voting activity?


    Given that UKIP got about 3% last time out such an approach is always going to significantly reduce their assessed performance. Those that don't past weigh in that way will no doubt reflect the current puff but pollsters who have been around for a while have excellent reasons to use past voting. It works.

    Whether it works as well for new kids on the block as it does for existing parties will be determined at the next election. My guess is that it will but it is clearly a bigger challenge for a pollster to get right than a movement between the established parties.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,574
    Last time I checked ICM or might have been Ipsos phone survey there was very little adjustment from raw data to headline intention.
    Self selecting surveys that feel they need to adjust data so much are not worth as much in my book as a randomly seeded mobile number survey. 94% of adults have a mobile http://www.mobilemastinfo.com/stats-and-facts/ so the odds of obtaining a truly random sample from randomly picking say 1500 numbers are going to be pretty good.
    Landline surveys will probably be worse I'd say now as for instance I simply don't use one nor have it plugged in at my home during the day (Anecdotal, sample size 1 etc) but I think alot of people probably just use mobiles and have the internet plugged straight into the wall...

    Does any polling company use a random seed generator of mobile numbers for it's surveys ?
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    tim said:

    FPT-

    I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?


    Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
    Netherlands has the advantage of being very flat though, making building easy and land usable. If you stripped out the land scale which wasn't suitable for building (a large proportion of Wales and Scotland for example), then the figures would be a little different.

    For example the South East of England has a population density of 1,170 per square km.. compared with Netherlands of 1,048.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    A meaningless statement as not all people polled are equal, and nor do they fit comfortably into demographics.

    As OGH said:
    Both Populus and Survation operate in a very similar manner. Both do their fieldwork online, both weight for likely turnout
    So any differences in their sample, etc, should be random, and cancel out other time, but instead we have a systematic difference, which can only be attributable to the different weighting formulas applied in an attempt to be sure that they have a politically representative sample.

    The question this raises is: Which approach is right?

    I suspect that past vote recall is imperfect, though with an online panel you could at least poll people shortly after the general election itself, and use those responses to weight your sample, thus improving the accuracy.

    The "closely identified with" question is, in my opinion, highly suspect, as it is asking the respondent to treat something as being fixed and unchanging which really isn't. People do change their political allegiances, and asking them to pretend that they haven't is asking for trouble in my opinion.
  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    DavidL said:

    IANAE, despite the attempts of many on here over the years to fill my pit of ignorance but am I not right in thinking that companies such as Populus weigh certainty to vote on the back of past voting activity?


    Given that UKIP got about 3% last time out such an approach is always going to significantly reduce their assessed performance. Those that don't past weigh in that way will no doubt reflect the current puff but pollsters who have been around for a while have excellent reasons to use past voting. It works.

    Whether it works as well for new kids on the block as it does for existing parties will be determined at the next election. My guess is that it will but it is clearly a bigger challenge for a pollster to get right than a movement between the established parties.

    As Mike says in the thread header , Populus weight by Party ID not Past Vote ,
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    tim said:

    FPT-

    I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?


    Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
    So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.

  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    Pulpstar said:

    Last time I checked ICM or might have been Ipsos phone survey there was very little adjustment from raw data to headline intention.
    Self selecting surveys that feel they need to adjust data so much are not worth as much in my book as a randomly seeded mobile number survey. 94% of adults have a mobile http://www.mobilemastinfo.com/stats-and-facts/ so the odds of obtaining a truly random sample from randomly picking say 1500 numbers are going to be pretty good.
    Landline surveys will probably be worse I'd say now as for instance I simply don't use one nor have it plugged in at my home during the day (Anecdotal, sample size 1 etc) but I think alot of people probably just use mobiles and have the internet plugged straight into the wall...

    Does any polling company use a random seed generator of mobile numbers for it's surveys ?

    ICM has been polling mobiles as well as landlines since March 2012. In that sense it has a greater reach than other firms.

  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    tim said:

    tim said:

    FPT-

    I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?


    Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
    So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.

    If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums

    And how much stuff does Guernsey need to import?.... rather a lot I'd imagine, unless you think they live off butter and potatoes (wait that's Jersey....).
  • R0bertsR0berts Posts: 391
    DavidL said:

    IANAE, despite the attempts of many on here over the years to fill my pit of ignorance but am I not right in thinking that companies such as Populus weigh certainty to vote on the back of past voting activity?


    Given that UKIP got about 3% last time out such an approach is always going to significantly reduce their assessed performance. Those that don't past weigh in that way will no doubt reflect the current puff but pollsters who have been around for a while have excellent reasons to use past voting. It works.

    Whether it works as well for new kids on the block as it does for existing parties will be determined at the next election. My guess is that it will but it is clearly a bigger challenge for a pollster to get right than a movement between the established parties.

    Yep, General Election Voting Intention polling is already a tricky thing to get right, as you can only test your methods once every four or five years. Which is never going to provide a big enough sample size to be certain of your methodology.

    Then you throw in new political dynamics like Coalition government, and the rise of UKIP, and it's even more pays your money, takes your choice.

    Still, it's the best guide to the electoral landscape that we have. And of course trends are always informative.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited October 2013
    Hmm - I gather badger isn't terribly tasty. And rat? Lots of bones for little meat. It's the fleas, ticks and other diseases that'd put me right off. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/motoring/news/10375201/Eat-roadkill-says-new-face-of-the-RSPB.html I'm surprised she doesn't mention wind turbine kill - ohhh...

    "She was unveiled as the new face of the RSPB this weekend.

    But its more than one million members might be surprised to learn that Miranda Krestovnikoff, the BBC broadcaster, is championing the eating of some of Britain’s wildlife — more precisely, roadkill. The presenter has told how she wants more people to source their meat not from a local supermarket or specialist butchers, but rather, from the roadside.

    She spoke after hosting a dinner party for friends featuring rat — fried and served with a garlic and soy sauce dip — from the B3347 near Sopley in the New Forest; fox, sautéd in garlic, from the Ferndown bypass, near Wimborne, Dorset; and badger chasseur, served with tomato sauce and croutons, picked up from the A354 near Salisbury.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    AEP on France and the FRIP surge..

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100025783/time-to-take-bets-on-frexit-and-the-french-franc/

    "We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election.
    It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."
  • AnorakAnorak Posts: 6,621
    tim said:

    tim said:

    FPT-

    I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?


    Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
    So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.

    If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums
    LOL. Excellent trolling. Getting lots of bites, I see.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,574
    edited October 2013
    http://www.icmresearch.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2013/09/2013_sept_guardian_poll.pdf Minimal 'base' reweighting, and then a direct filter by 7/10+ certainty to vote (Which I would assume matches GE turnout).



    I have no idea how Survation can UP the UKIP vote share tbh. ICM seems pretty good, is the October one due out soon ?

    One thing, if I was ICM I'd up the proportion of mobile seeds to landline :)
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    tim said:

    tim said:

    FPT-

    I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?


    Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
    So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.

    If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums



    With birth rates and even more immigration when we hit 120m,it won,t be to long before we get 195m and this is little England we are posting about - just total madness.

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..

    Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....

    Nice work at the taxpayers teet -

  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    Shoot your own foxes. Gas your own badgers, and Cull your own deer.

    Something tells me that all this discussion about roadkill, will merely bring back the busty girls in tight t shirts on PB's advertising.

    +1000.
  • TGOHF said:

    AEP on France and the FRIP surge..

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100025783/time-to-take-bets-on-frexit-and-the-french-franc/

    "We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election.
    It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."

    I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;

    "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "



  • I suspect Populus is more right than Survation, for two reasons:

    a) Populus is well-respected political pollster, and they ran their on-line surveys for a couple of years before switching, refining their weightings to match the phone polls.

    b) It is well-known that on-line panels are very prone to self-selection bias (supporters who are fired up are disproportionately likely to respond), and we know that Kippers are fired up with their (admittedly rather quaint) view that UKIP represents something new and exciting. Therefore one would definitely expect that the UKIP score should be weighted downwards in any online poll; one can argue about how much it should be weighted down by, but it streteches credulity to see that Survation actually weighted the raw UKIP number up.
  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    Pulpstar said:

    http://www.icmresearch.com/wp-content/blogs.dir/1/files/2013/09/2013_sept_guardian_poll.pdf Minimal 'base' reweighting, and then a direct filter by 7/10+ certainty to vote (Which I would assume matches GE turnout).



    I have no idea how Survation can UP the UKIP vote share tbh. ICM seems pretty good, is the October one due out soon ?

    One thing, if I was ICM I'd up the proportion of mobile seeds to landline :)

    Although AFAIK ICM have not published anything I am sure that they are monitoring whether there is a difference in responses for landlines and mobiles and will change the proportions if necessary .
  • TGOHF said:

    I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..

    Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....

    Nice work at the taxpayers teet -

    The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.

    If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.

  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    FPT-

    I'm asking you tim,not Thatcher,again,on just immigration,how many more people do you think England can take in before the full signs go up - 90 million ? more ?


    Absolutely no idea, as Carlotta posted at the end of the last thread if we were as densely populated as the Netherlands we'd have 120m, but I think age structure is probably much more important economically than arbitrary totals
    So the best I can get out of you is 120m and that's just on immigration,more than double the population of England that it is now,just madness.

    If we had the same population density as Guernsey it'd be 195 million, with the same urban decay and teeming slums



    With birth rates and even more immigration when we hit 120m,it won,t be to long before we get 195m and this is little England we are posting about - just total madness.


    If we had the same population density as Singapore we'd have 1.8 Billion people, with all the crime and poverty that Singapore is notorious for.
    Oh sh!t,tim talking in billions now,I have to lay down ;-)
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..

    Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....

    Nice work at the taxpayers teet -

    The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.

    If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.

    If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.


  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited October 2013
    What I love most about the absurd Labourite thinking is that unless we are the most densely populated nation we are somehow Little Englanders and if we don't have a national debt as big as we did after fighting a 6yrs World War our finances are tickety-boo.

    It's hilarious - who do they think falls for this stuff?
  • Plato said:

    What I love most about the absurd Labourite thinking is that unless we are the most densely populated nation we are somehow Little Englanders and if we don't have a national debt as big as we did after fighting a 6yrs World War our finances are tickety-boo.

    It's hilarious - who do they think falls for this stuff?

    Why do you make these things up about "Labourite thinking"?

    It's not hilarious that you do so, but it is rather peculiar!

  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    OT Just seen this from Tim Stanley - I'd forgotten how brilliant Spit the Dog was.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=hKjPosgpxlw
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    edited October 2013
    TGOHF said:

    I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..

    These? Popular girl, Stephanie....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/celebritynews/10367545/Did-Stephanie-Flanders-flee-the-BBC-because-of-James-Harding.html
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    edited October 2013
    Plato said:

    What I love most about the absurd Labourite thinking is that unless we are the most densely populated nation we are somehow Little Englanders and if we don't have a national debt as big as we did after fighting a 6yrs World War our

    finances are tickety-boo.

    It's hilarious - who do they think falls for this stuff?

    I know,some of these people plato belong to the real fruit & nut party.

  • TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..

    Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....

    Nice work at the taxpayers teet -

    The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.

    If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.

    If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.


    Sorry, I thought you were interested in a serious discussion. Now I understand that it comes down to your belief that because the BBC does not always report the news in the way you would like it to be reported it is a big anti-Tory conspiracy. I imagine that Flanders' notorious left-wing views are why the famously Marxist JP Morgan have trebled her salary to £400,000 pa.

  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..

    Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....

    Nice work at the taxpayers teet -

    The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.

    If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.

    If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.


    Lol - agreed. I believe she was an ex squeeze of Miliband and Balls which are 2 squeezes more than anyone needs on an economics cv.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    From that AEP article on FREXIT:

    "I might add that the Front is nothing like Ukip, a mostly pro-American, Right-leaning, libertarian, anti-welfare, free-market party. Marine Le Pen is an ardent defender of the French welfare model. Her critique of capitalism gives her a Leftist hue. Some call it 1930s national socialism, and here we are starting to touch on the populist appeal. She fulminates against Washington and Nato, calling for France to retake its place as "non-aligned" voice in a multipolar world, and lashing out at the Gaulliste UMP for selling its soul to Europe and the Anglo-Saxon order."

    So it would be unwise to read-across Front success in France to UKIP success in the UK - in particular where its support comes from.....
  • TGOHF said:

    AEP on France and the FRIP surge..

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100025783/time-to-take-bets-on-frexit-and-the-french-franc/

    "We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election.
    It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."

    I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;

    "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "



    Tragically for AEP, the Socialists did not actually field a candidate in the election. But never mind!

  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    edited October 2013
    Pulpstar said:
    From Table 1. Unweighted C1s and C2s = 336, Weighted C1s and C2s = 501. That's quite a lot of weighting.

    It's the C2s I'd be particularly worried by. The voting intentions of C2 voters are based on an unweighted base of 131 respondents, weighted up to 210. They split 17% Labour to 10% Conservative, compared to 29-37 in 2010. They have one of the highest rates of don't knows, at 30%.

    And then, of course, one is left to consider what fraction of the sample actually lives in the Middle England Towns and Their Hinterlands, where the election will be decided. I'm continually amazed that pollsters manage to do so well, to be honest.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    tim said:

    @Tykejohnno

    If we had the same population density as Monaco we'd have 4.2 Billion people and all the deprivation, slums and shanty towns that people fear in that hellhole.

    I'd stick to Guernsey if I were you. That was almost funny. Now you are just flogging the joke into extiction
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    tim said:

    @Tykejohnno

    If we had the same population density as Monaco we'd have 4.2 Billion people and all the deprivation, slums and shanty towns that people fear in that hellhole.

    So you'd be happy for us to convert to a entirely service economy based on the rich.. with no place for poor people

    Hmmm interesting.
  • tim seems obsessed with tax havens on this thread and their population density... I'm puzzled, is he about to do a Branson?
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362
    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

  • Hello Pulpstar, RichardNabavi, Mark Senior. The reason why the UKIP figure went up after weighting is pretty straightforward. Firstly you'll see that the raw figures were underweight the 55+ age group, which is UKIP's strongest group so weighting the sample took them up.

    Secondly like ICM we weight by likelihood to vote, and UKIP voters have a high LTV so would go up on that also.

    There is also an adjustment for DK/REF (like ICM) which took the UKIP figure LOWER in a final step.
  • JonnyJimmyJonnyJimmy Posts: 2,548
    If we had the same population density as France, where people are so upset by immigration they're voting in droves for the FN, we'd have a population of under 28.5m
  • 'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    I saw a little article in the S Times yesterday about Stephanie Flanders leaving for a merchant bank job - for reasons nudge nudge wink wink etc not worth mentioning..

    Apparently she's in for a pay rise as she "only" got £120k pa as BBC economics correspondent....

    Nice work at the taxpayers teet -

    The fact that she got that job in the private sector may indicate that she is pretty marketable. I guess the BBC could pay £25,000 a year and bring in someone with no contacts, no broadcasting ability and no understanding of economics. Not sure it would be money well spent though.

    If you want to get angry about BBC wages I'd look at the management rather than at highly-skilled, well-regarded correspondents. That's where the bloat really is. I imagine the BBC could comfortably half the salaries of all its senior managers with ease. Some might walk, but I'd doubt they'd be hugely difficult to replace.

    If I wanted to pay over the odds to hear a dismal left wing view of the state of the finances I'd join a union and attend the Labour conference.


    Just so long as you don't pay in to a bloated charity such as those infesting the worlds of private health and private education.

    Private schools ? I would if I had the cash. Private health - well of course - those nice chaps at Bupa get me up the old queue for an op when required :

    clear the proles - fee payer coming into the operating theatre.."
  • Hello Pulpstar, RichardNabavi, Mark Senior. The reason why the UKIP figure went up after weighting is pretty straightforward. Firstly you'll see that the raw figures were underweight the 55+ age group, which is UKIP's strongest group so weighting the sample took them up. .

    Thanks for the response, much appreciated. I take the point on the age weighting, that's fair enough.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    Given the guy has failed his application 5 times, where exactly is the minister wrong?

  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699

    Hello Pulpstar, RichardNabavi, Mark Senior. The reason why the UKIP figure went up after weighting is pretty straightforward. Firstly you'll see that the raw figures were underweight the 55+ age group, which is UKIP's strongest group so weighting the sample took them up.

    Secondly like ICM we weight by likelihood to vote, and UKIP voters have a high LTV so would go up on that also.

    There is also an adjustment for DK/REF (like ICM) which took the UKIP figure LOWER in a final step.

    Thanks for taking the trouble to post this explanation
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    Harper for PM ;-) a politician with backbone.
  • WRT the French news, the Socialists backed a Communist ally. That candidate failed to make the run off then you had the wonderful sight of the Socialists running around trying to convince people to support the UMP.

    Oh France.

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983

    TGOHF said:

    AEP on France and the FRIP surge..

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100025783/time-to-take-bets-on-frexit-and-the-french-franc/

    "We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election.
    It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."

    I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;

    "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "



    I found that part of the article particularly ignorant. The Socialists didnt stand in the first round...

  • TGOHF said:

    AEP on France and the FRIP surge..

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100025783/time-to-take-bets-on-frexit-and-the-french-franc/

    "We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election.
    It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."

    I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;

    "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "



    Tragically for AEP, the Socialists did not actually field a candidate in the election. But never mind!

    SO , merde.

    Carratala was the PS proxy. He had their support , he was their candidate.

    " Lopez came in first in the initial round of voting October 6, receiving 40.4 percent of the vote in an election in which 66.65 percent of the town’s 20,728 registered voters abstained. PCF candidate Laurent Carratala, supported by the PS and the petty-bourgeois “left”, finished a humiliating third, with 14.6 percent, and was eliminated from the second round. "



  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    RT @Jamin2g: Ed Balls collects his Nobel prize for economics. #skynews #bbcnews pic.twitter.com/Y2uR8HAQDd
  • 'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    That's IDS's third reference to 'The Welfare Party' when referring to The Labour Party...

    That's a sticker.
  • TGOHF said:

    AEP on France and the FRIP surge..

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/finance/ambroseevans-pritchard/100025783/time-to-take-bets-on-frexit-and-the-french-franc/

    "We have a minor earthquake in France. A party committed to withdrawal from the euro, the restoration of French franc, and the complete destruction of monetary union has just defeated the establishment in the Brignoles run-off election.
    It is threatening Frexit as well, which rather alters the political chemistry of Britain's EU referendum."

    I found this part of AEP's excellent article particularly interesting ;

    "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round, due to mass defection to the Front National by the working-class Socialist base. The Socialists thought the Front worked to their advantage by splitting the Right. They have at last woken up to the enormous political danger "



    Tragically for AEP, the Socialists did not actually field a candidate in the election. But never mind!

    SO , merde.

    Carratala was the PS proxy. He had their support , he was their candidate.

    " Lopez came in first in the initial round of voting October 6, receiving 40.4 percent of the vote in an election in which 66.65 percent of the town’s 20,728 registered voters abstained. PCF candidate Laurent Carratala, supported by the PS and the petty-bourgeois “left”, finished a humiliating third, with 14.6 percent, and was eliminated from the second round. "



    Non

    The statement "President Hollande's Socialists were knocked out in the first round" is just plain wrong, I'm afraid.
  • TykejohnnoTykejohnno Posts: 7,362

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    Bollocks,the bbc thought harper would come on and backtrack when facing a failed asylum seeker.

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    From 'Go Home' Vans to Judge Judy expulsions.

    Bravo to the Home Office.

    We now need to set a 'Bad Brother' TV in an asylum seekers hostel and let the real Brits decide who goes next.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Quite.

    Mark Denten @BBCMarkDenten
    Work and Pensions Sec Iain Duncan Smith says Labour "carping about the benefits cap" when many working people don't earn that much
  • 'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    Bollocks,the bbc thought harper would come on and backtrack when facing a failed asylum seeker.

    That's right. Off to feed my flying pigs now ...

  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,574


    And then, of course, one is left to consider what fraction of the sample actually lives in the Middle England Towns and Their Hinterlands, where the election will be decided. I'm continually amazed that pollsters manage to do so well, to be honest.


    This is why Ashcroft's marginal polls are a godsend for GE predictions.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    Bollocks,the bbc thought harper would come on and backtrack when facing a failed asylum seeker.

    That's right. Off to feed my flying pigs now ...

    Oh god - another lefty pretending to be a farmer...
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Esther McVey taking no prisoners at DWP questions.....
  • No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.
  • TwistedFireStopperTwistedFireStopper Posts: 2,538
    edited October 2013
    That e-fit is bizarre-one guy, 2 different faces. I reckon I work with both of them, in fact I went cycling with the chubby one this morning. Is there a reward?


  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    .
    The best thing about that article is Comments Are Closed. Its all terribly tragic for her parents but my sympathy ran out several yrs ago since when a hundred or more kids have gone missing or been assumed murdered like April Jones and there's not been 1/10th of the media mania around them.

    At the end of day - the McCanns went socialising with their friends whilst their toddler was alone.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Steve Webb congratulates his oppo on surviving the reshuffle 'The Blair Ditch Project'.....
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    SeanT said:

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    Bollocks,the bbc thought harper would come on and backtrack when facing a failed asylum seeker.

    That's right. Off to feed my flying pigs now ...

    Tykejohnno is almost certainly right. I know how TV producers think, seeing as I have lots of TV producer friends. They wanted the minister to be humiliated/embarrassed by a real live suffering asylum seeker.
    Yes, I think Harper handled what had been set up as an ambush well.....

  • TwistedFireStopperTwistedFireStopper Posts: 2,538
    edited October 2013
    Plato said:

    .

    The best thing about that article is Comments Are Closed. Its all terribly tragic for her parents but my sympathy ran out several yrs ago since when a hundred or more kids have gone missing or been assumed murdered like April Jones and there's not been 1/10th of the media mania around them.

    At the end of day - the McCanns went socialising with their friends whilst their toddler was alone.
    To be fair, cases like April Jones do get a lot(rightly) of media interest. I can't blame the McCann's for doing their utmost to find out what happened to their daughter, I'd be the same.
    Leaving the children alone, whilst the adults went out, was certainly a questionable decision, but that shouldn't mean that finding out what happened isn't important.

  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Plato said:
    Why is that a good thing?
  • MillsyMillsy Posts: 900

    No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.

    Isn't that because hardly anyone identified with Ukip in 2010?
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    IDS: In every programme we've got we're driving costs down. Labour OPPOSED every single one of £83 BILLION of welfare budget savings #DWPqs
  • Plato said:

    Quite.

    Mark Denten @BBCMarkDenten
    Work and Pensions Sec Iain Duncan Smith says Labour "carping about the benefits cap" when many working people don't earn that much

    Most people in work are doing OK, so Labour don't really claim to support them.

    Labour - the party of the shirking class.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    Plato said:

    IDS: In every programme we've got we're driving costs down. Labour OPPOSED every single one of £83 BILLION of welfare budget savings #DWPqs

    I thought Labour were ridiculous when they announced the compounded increase in spending over three years for Health, back in the late 90s. I remember it causing a bit of a fuss at the time, with the Opposition complaining that they should not mislead people by adding together three years in such a way.

    How many years has IDS added together to reach his absurd figure of £83 billion?
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    Dopey IDS is going to be outflanked and he's too busy trying to understand the faulty roll out of Universal Credit across Ashton Under Lyme to realise it.

    @TelePolitics: Blog: Labour's new plans to dismantle the welfare system make IDS look like a wimp. The Left will be furious http://t.co/ulyr9icxVL

    But then again he doesn't understand why he's presided over a rise in welfare spending either

    To be outflanked you need something on your flank - not a wishy washy promise to spend the bonus tax for the 13th time with a mythical forced hard labour regime.

  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,192
    edited October 2013
    Plato said:

    IDS: In every programme we've got we're driving costs down. Labour OPPOSED every single one of £83 BILLION of welfare budget savings #DWPqs

    Sigh. IDS has problems with numbers in the same way that Gordon Brown did. Double and treble counting. Whilst I agree with the sentiment he should stop saying such ridiculous things.

  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    tim said:

    Dopey IDS is going to be outflanked

    Finally a party tough enough on disabled people for your tastes!
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    SeanT said:

    Um, sorry to be a bit rubbish, but can someone offer me more advice on Royal Mail shares?

    I want to sell mine tomorrow, but I don't know where the F they are, let alone how to sell them. The Royal Mail has taken my £5k from my account, not replied, given no explanation what to do, not refunded my unused £4.3k, and all I have is a "share offer number".

    Duh.

    You should have received a share certificate. It has probably got lost in the post. Why not try Royal Mail's online Track and Trace service?

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,098
    SeanT said:

    Um, sorry to be a bit rubbish, but can someone offer me more advice on Royal Mail shares?

    I want to sell mine tomorrow, but I don't know where the F they are, let alone how to sell them. The Royal Mail has taken my £5k from my account, not replied, given no explanation what to do, not refunded my unused £4.3k, and all I have is a "share offer number".

    Duh.

    They are all at the share depositary in Lagos and you will shortly be contacted by email with a tremendous opportunity to increase your holding.
  • Yes Millsy, that's correct. Under this method UKIP could get more popular and established but the headline figure could actually go LOWER. As more of the sample said they "identified" with UKIP they would join the "reduce to 1%" group.
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited October 2013
    AveryLP said:

    SeanT said:

    Um, sorry to be a bit rubbish, but can someone offer me more advice on Royal Mail shares?

    I want to sell mine tomorrow, but I don't know where the F they are, let alone how to sell them. The Royal Mail has taken my £5k from my account, not replied, given no explanation what to do, not refunded my unused £4.3k, and all I have is a "share offer number".

    Duh.

    You should have received a share certificate. It has probably got lost in the post. Why not try Royal Mail's online Track and Trace service?

    Or you could just contact a broker - Hargreaves Lansdown @ £11.95 per trade is probably the best bet. Some online services (e.g. www.x-o.co.uk) offer cheaper transaction fees but require you to pay an annual subscription fee. Worth it if you intend to stag other IPOs or trade shares you currently hold but not for a one off.

    You can trade without the certificate. The Share Certificate number and personal ID are the key.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,192
    Is there not an online, special reduced commission arrangement in place for those who don't want to be long term investors in a strike ridden, overmanned cess pit with considerable structural disadvantages and ever more competitors?

    I am still trying to make up my mind. The short term dividends promised are a lot better than deposit accounts.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,574

    No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.

    I hope you are right on UKIP as it would mean my 2 GE seat bet would be likely. I suspect you are wrong ;)
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    Survation don't just weight by past vote:
    "Data is weighted to the profile of all adults aged 18+. Data is weighted by gender, age, region and pastvote. Targets for the weighted data are derived from Office of National Statistics, 2011 Census data andthe results of the 2010 General Election"

    http://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:UbL-oAqy1aAJ:survation.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Data-Collection-Method.pdf
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    SeanT said:

    For the many many pb-ers enthralled by my tales from the Frankfurt Book Fair, I can report that the German auction of my thriller is still ongoing. We're now up to €45k with four publishers left in the race.

    It's like an exciting horse race over fences but conducted in very slow motion underwater, where everyone keeps having enormous boozy lunches between hurdles.


    Oh I forgot to say that the balance of the £5,000 you deposited with the government's agents will be returned to you after it is no longer needed to eliminate the annual deficit.

    George Osborne tweets from China that the delay will be a maximum of 13 working days.

  • MaxPBMaxPB Posts: 39,301
    tim said:

    Sunny Hundal ‏@sunny_hundal 7m
    So while visitors from India (our 2nd biggest investors) have to pay £3k bond to visit, Chinese get unlimited visas? Indians will be furious

    The people that China let out of China are highly likely to go back home. The same is not true for Indians. It's a fair solution. Especially since the Indian government decided to up the Visa charge for UK nationals from ~£40 to ~£90 for a visitor visa.

    I can see Narendra Modi making moves to cool the tension between the UK and India when it comes to border control, but he has to win first. If the UPA win again then it's only going to get worse as India will continue to export their poor and unemployed to neighbouring countries and nations with lax border controls.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Average spend of Chinese vs Indian visitor whilst in the Uk ?

    Follow the money...
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    James Chapman tweets: "Esther McVey overshadowed opening IDS/Reeves skirmishes - quite the star of the show at #DWPQs. Startling improvement at the despatch box"
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    AveryLP said:



    Oh I forgot to say that the balance of the £5,000 you deposited with the government's agents will be returned to you after it is no longer needed to eliminate the annual deficit.

    I heard it was being distributed to the top 10 lefty charities as voted for by Guardian readers.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    DavidL said:

    Is there not an online, special reduced commission arrangement in place for those who don't want to be long term investors in a strike ridden, overmanned cess pit with considerable structural disadvantages and ever more competitors?

    I am still trying to make up my mind. The short term dividends promised are a lot better than deposit accounts.

    Question is whether you want to hold £1000 in a single stock. More most people this will either be too much or too little.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Mr. Max, those are good points on India and China. They're very different bags of monkeys.

    In Malaysia a court has ruled Christians cannot refer to their god as Allah (apparently this has happened for ages there), only Muslims can:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-24516181

    This reminds me, writ small, of the story I heard about the Coptic Pope in Egypt being forced to appear on TV and disagree with one of his own bishops, who asserted that (in essence) Christianity was right and Islam was wrong [it was a matter of history].
  • SeanT said:

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    'You have no right to be in the UK and you should leave': Extraordinary moment immigration minister tells five-time failed asylum seeker to go home on live TV

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2458617/Mark-Harper-tells-time-failed-asylum-seeker-home-live-TV.html

    This cannot have happened.

    47 minutes in:

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b03c62xc/Sunday_Politics_West_13_10_2013/

    Nope, it's impossible. The far-left, Britain-hating, immigrant-adoring, Tory-despising BBC would never allow it. Must be a different broadcaster.

    Bollocks,the bbc thought harper would come on and backtrack when facing a failed asylum seeker.

    That's right. Off to feed my flying pigs now ...

    Tykejohnno is almost certainly right. I know how TV producers think, seeing as I have lots of TV producer friends. They wanted the minister to be humiliated/embarrassed by a real live suffering asylum seeker.

    I suspect that what they wanted is what they got - compelling television.

  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    edited October 2013

    No problem Mark Senior. The key difference between the way Survation & Populus treat UKIP is that Populus "takes out" most of the UKIP VI who ALSO say they "identify" with UKIP. What you see reported in their UKIP headline VI are effectively just the switchers TO UKIP from another party.

    The main problem which you have not addressed here is the fact that Online pollsters find more UKIP supporters in the first place than telephone pollsters , This is particularly true of Comres who carry out both types of polling . This fundamental difference is then masked somewhat by some of the Online pollsters such as Populus and to a lesser extent Yougov by severe Party ID weighting . Now you may argue that their weighting in this way is unjustified or too harsh but you have not answered the basic discrepancy between online and telephone polling results .
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    Norman Smith BBC: "European Commission suggest there are more Brits claiming benefits in Spain than there are all other EU nationals claiming in UK"
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Do papers still weight by paper, or have they stopped doing that?

    I don't think anyone will try this, but it'd be fascinating to try and correlate favourite book genres and voting intentions.
  • MaxPB said:

    tim said:

    Sunny Hundal ‏@sunny_hundal 7m
    So while visitors from India (our 2nd biggest investors) have to pay £3k bond to visit, Chinese get unlimited visas? Indians will be furious

    The people that China let out of China are highly likely to go back home. The same is not true for Indians. It's a fair solution. Especially since the Indian government decided to up the Visa charge for UK nationals from ~£40 to ~£90 for a visitor visa.

    I can see Narendra Modi making moves to cool the tension between the UK and India when it comes to border control, but he has to win first. If the UPA win again then it's only going to get worse as India will continue to export their poor and unemployed to neighbouring countries and nations with lax border controls.

    India's poor are stuck in India, living on its streets and in its slums. They certainly don't have close to enough money to buy plane tickets to fly all the way to the UK.

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,098

    James Chapman tweets: "Esther McVey overshadowed opening IDS/Reeves skirmishes - quite the star of the show at #DWPQs. Startling improvement at the despatch box"

    In marked contradistinction to Meg Hillier who got an absolute shellacking on DP today on Free Schools.

    Very amusing it was, too.
  • Norman Smith BBC: "European Commission suggest there are more Brits claiming benefits in Spain than there are all other EU nationals claiming in UK"

    Doubt that's true, but if it is it would be hilarious.

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Miss Vance, I doubt the difference matches or exceeds the billions we pay to the cabal of bureaucrats every year.
This discussion has been closed.