Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As Boris speculation grows the latest bets on whether he’ll

SystemSystem Posts: 12,250
edited October 2013 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » As Boris speculation grows the latest bets on whether he’ll make an early return to the Commons

With Dave saying he would welcome the return of Boris to the House of Commons, Hills are offering odds of 4/1 that he will become an MP BEFORE the General Election, and 6/4 that he does so AT the General Election.

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • Anyone who saw Boris interviewed by Paxman last night would surely say that the idea of him ever becoming PM is laughable. He'll return to the Commons, but his star is not shining as brightly as it was.
  • PongPong Posts: 4,693
    FPT: re: ladbrokes 'Hard Working Families'

    Based on past performance I should steer well clear of the Buzzword bingo, but the 6/4 looks too generous - I'd price it at ~4/5. Is Shadsy on holiday?

    Thanks @tim
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Boris's best bet is to see out his term.

    If necessary he could enter a leadership race after the next general election even if he doesn't have a seat. The idea of holding a leadership race without him if he chooses to stand is unthinkable. Any leader elected from a race that excluded him would lack a mandate, so the pressure to change the rules to let him stand would be irresistible. In practice, I expect David Cameron would defer stepping down until Boris was back in the House of Commons at a by-election.
  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    edited October 2013
    The odds are bonkers. 11/4 on him to stand, 6/4 on him to win. He ain't gonna stand somewhere he won't win, and he can't win without standing, so fill your boots on the 11/4 (or as much of a boot as Hills will allow you, which is tuppence ha'penny in my case)
  • Cameron was giving huge hints this morning on Today that Boris would stand. I think they've done a deal.
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746

    Feel a little dirty for thinking it but I wonder if the fact that Ed Miliband is ethnically Jewish and getting more known for being due to the likes of this article will mean Respect do better in ceriain places than they would have done if Brown was still PM. That 3/1 on Respect winning in Bradford East is tempting. I believe Oona King lost a few votes due to perceived jewishness in Bethnal Green and Bow

    That's an interesting point. In London Mr Livingstone made a big show of aligning himself with muslim voters.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Next Prime Minister is an interesting market.

    Let's assume the 8/13 Miliband is correct[ish - it's actually a touch short]. How do we bet "Any other Labour" and "Any Tory"? I'd have thought something like 5/1 and 9/4 - implying that if Miliband doesn't get in, it's about 2:1 in the Tories' favour - having the advantage of most of the more likely 2015-2020 Dave replacement options in there first.

    Hills have placed the Labourites too short here and as such May @ 14/1 looks a touch of value, and even BoJo 20/1 isn't horrible, though I can't see it myself. For the more adventurous, Jeremy Hunt is available at 66s elsewhere.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.
  • [turning to the camera]
    Boris Johnson is an alpha bloke!
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Would you really want to be leader of the Conservatives with a major rival on the backbenches who had been excluded from the leadership contest you won, who was highly ambitious and who much of the public suspected would have beaten you in a fair fight?

    The correct solution to this conundrum for any serious politician is to make sure Boris Johnson could stand and hope to beat him, not to try to hide behind party rules.
  • Cameron was giving huge hints this morning on Today that Boris would stand. I think they've done a deal.

    If that is the case, Cameron can't regard him as a serious rival. He's surely right about that.

  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    8/13 Ed Miliband; 12 Yvette Cooper; 14/1 Theresa May; 16/1 Chuka Umunna; 20/1 Boris Johnson.

    Interesting odds in some respects, in terms of charisma and ability to charm people Boris is underrated. Miliband figure of fun, or pity? May or Cooper hard to decide which of them is more charmless or overrated. Umunna you cannot be serious.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    Presumably BoJo has gone pro-Cameron as he now thinks Cameron can "win" [290+ seats or so] - and his own support will also make that victory marginally more likely.

    So he'd be best served by Cameron then remaining as PM and Boris coming back into the Commons c. 2017.

    To be honest, so much is going to depend on the precise result of the election and the government that results. Betting on the "Year of Next General Election After May 2015" would be interesting; my tissue would be something like:

    2015 4/1
    2016 9/2
    2017 8/1
    2018 12/1
    2019 10/1
    2020 11/10

  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    Bruce Forsyth thinks Boris Johnson would be ideal.......er......as his successor to host Strictly (Mail this week-end).

    Cripes. A positively illiadic tango. Like watching Paris and Helen in the first flush of the doomed love affair that destroyed homeric troy....
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Not sure about the contention on doubling-up. The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP (after all, he did much the same when he remained editor of The Spectator while an MP last time).

    While I agree with antifrank that the rules would probably be changed were Boris to see out his term and the Tories to lose office in 2015, it'd still be more difficult for him to win while outside parliament (though there is precedent: Douglas-Home became leader in that position).
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    @Tissue_Price I'll have some of the 11/10 on 2020.
  • All the more reason for his rivals to ensure he's on the ballot paper, MP or not.
    tim said:

    antifrank said:

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Would you really want to be leader of the Conservatives with a major rival on the backbenches who had been excluded from the leadership contest you won, who was highly ambitious and who much of the public suspected would have beaten you in a fair fight?

    The correct solution to this conundrum for any serious politician is to make sure Boris Johnson could stand and hope to beat him, not to try to hide behind party rules.

    Boris only remains a serious contender so long as he doesn't stand.


  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,098
    Boris is super definitely absolutely not a serious contender.

    Thing is, though, people love him.

    Which queers the pitch a bit.
  • I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP

    I can't imagine there's any association in a safe Home Counties seat which wouldn't be delighted to have him.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    antifrank said:

    @Tissue_Price I'll have some of the 11/10 on 2020.

    That's why it's a tissue; perhaps it should be odds-on - though bookies would gladly lay it "paid on" as it's only 11% p.a. return if it cops.

    To be honest I suspect you'll get a better price after polling day even if either side manages a majority.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Good afternoon, everyone.

    Mr. Polruan, I agree. I've backed that, and Red Ed at 4, and You Can't Trust Labour at 5.

    My thinking is that the Conservatives want to talk about the economy and Labour's lack of mentioning it. Land grabs by the state and price freezes are ripe for a return of Red Ed.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    tim said:

    And anyway the right of the party will not support his views on a living wage, a massive housebuilding programme and

    Nick Sutton ‏@suttonnick 1h
    AUDIO: Boris Johnson #wato "We can cope" with UK population of 90m but need "proper grown-up conversation" about it http://bit.ly/18KeUx4

    Which is a shame in some ways, as he's largely right.

    Come on, we know you're not that naive. Boris is a clever chap and he knows that the London electorate is different to the UK electorate, which is different to the Tory party membership electorate.

    Labour won in London at the 2010 GE by 36.6% to 34.5%, yet Boris still managed to win the mayoralty in 2012 (albeit against Livingstone).

    You could forgive a Tory for thinking that he'd be the party's best chance of a majority.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,098
    What prices are BoJo in non-PM cabinet - Home Sec, Foreign Sec, etc

    Another hung parliament, May = PM Boris = Home Sec works as a scenario.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,688

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Not sure about the contention on doubling-up. The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP (after all, he did much the same when he remained editor of The Spectator while an MP last time).

    While I agree with antifrank that the rules would probably be changed were Boris to see out his term and the Tories to lose office in 2015, it'd still be more difficult for him to win while outside parliament (though there is precedent: Douglas-Home became leader in that position).
    There's some talk that he has his eye on Reigate.

  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    edited October 2013
    It would never happen but it would be great to see Boris go up against a sitting high profile labour MP in a marginal (Morley and Outwood.......what entertainment that would be.....).
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,688
    tim said:

    "Clearly Boris wants to be there in the commons when Cameron steps down as leader"

    They won't go for a Bullingdon Etonian to follow a Bullingdon Etonian if Cameron has to step down.

    And anyway the right of the party will not support his views on a living wage, a massive housebuilding programme and

    Nick Sutton ‏@suttonnick 1h
    AUDIO: Boris Johnson #wato "We can cope" with UK population of 90m but need "proper grown-up conversation" about it http://bit.ly/18KeUx4

    Which is a shame in some ways, as he's largely right.


    So he'd be better off staying out, letting Cameron lose and May beat Gove, Hunt or Osborne (what a choice) and come back after 2016

    I think Boris' views will be largely the ones that the relevant electorate wish to hear.
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039
    TOPPING said:

    Another hung parliament, May = PM Boris = Home Sec works as a scenario.

    I'm not sure how well the public would take the imposition of a non-Cameron/Miliband Prime Minister in the event of a Hung Parliament.

    That's one potential crisis of legitimacy; another would be PM Miliband leading a Lab min or maj government 1.5%+ behind on votes - I really think things could get a bit nasty [the press tacitly encouraging civil disobedience?] if that were the case.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    edited October 2013
    tim said:

    tim said:

    And anyway the right of the party will not support his views on a living wage, a massive housebuilding programme and

    Nick Sutton ‏@suttonnick 1h
    AUDIO: Boris Johnson #wato "We can cope" with UK population of 90m but need "proper grown-up conversation" about it http://bit.ly/18KeUx4

    Which is a shame in some ways, as he's largely right.

    Come on, we know you're not that naive. Boris is a clever chap and he knows that the London electorate is different to the UK electorate, which is different to the Tory party membership electorate.

    Labour won in London at the 2010 GE by 36.6% to 34.5%, yet Boris still managed to win the mayoralty in 2012 (albeit against Livingstone).

    You could forgive a Tory for thinking that he'd be the party's best chance of a majority.
    "You could forgive a Tory for thinking that he'd be the party's best chance of a majority."

    I'd be surprised if the Tories thought he could sustain being leader of the opposition for five years.
    He's just about managed five years of turning up to be quizzed by the members of the Greater London Assembly. They're not exactly the Roman Senate.

  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Not sure about the contention on doubling-up. The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP (after all, he did much the same when he remained editor of The Spectator while an MP last time).

    While I agree with antifrank that the rules would probably be changed were Boris to see out his term and the Tories to lose office in 2015, it'd still be more difficult for him to win while outside parliament (though there is precedent: Douglas-Home became leader in that position).
    I may have my precise dates wrong (it was before I was even a twinkle in my Dad's eye) but wasn't Alec a peer at the time he ran - i.e. he was in Parliament, even if not in the commons. Hailsham was certainly a peer when he ran against Alec.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    tim said:

    tim said:

    And anyway the right of the party will not support his views on a living wage, a massive housebuilding programme and

    Nick Sutton ‏@suttonnick 1h
    AUDIO: Boris Johnson #wato "We can cope" with UK population of 90m but need "proper grown-up conversation" about it http://bit.ly/18KeUx4

    Which is a shame in some ways, as he's largely right.

    Come on, we know you're not that naive. Boris is a clever chap and he knows that the London electorate is different to the UK electorate, which is different to the Tory party membership electorate.

    Labour won in London at the 2010 GE by 36.6% to 34.5%, yet Boris still managed to win the mayoralty in 2012 (albeit against Livingstone).

    You could forgive a Tory for thinking that he'd be the party's best chance of a majority.

    "You could forgive a Tory for thinking that he'd be the party's best chance of a majority."

    I'd be surprised if the Tories thought he could sustain being leader of the opposition for five years.

    Unlikely to be a vacancy for a blue LoTo before 2025.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,854

    I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP

    I can't imagine there's any association in a safe Home Counties seat which wouldn't be delighted to have him.
    How far out do you reckon? Saffron Walden in NE Essex should be available next time.

  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,854
    Charles said:

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Not sure about the contention on doubling-up. The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP (after all, he did much the same when he remained editor of The Spectator while an MP last time).

    While I agree with antifrank that the rules would probably be changed were Boris to see out his term and the Tories to lose office in 2015, it'd still be more difficult for him to win while outside parliament (though there is precedent: Douglas-Home became leader in that position).
    I may have my precise dates wrong (it was before I was even a twinkle in my Dad's eye) but wasn't Alec a peer at the time he ran - i.e. he was in Parliament, even if not in the commons. Hailsham was certainly a peer when he ran against Alec.
    Yes; Lord Home. He subsequently renounced his hereditary peerage, won a seat in Perth, then took another peerage after being defeated as PM.

  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591

    The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. ).

    I wonder how he would put this intention over to his putative constituents? You have to understand that you are only going to be third on my priority list after the mayoralty and my leadership campaign? They might prefer another candidate who actually wanted to do the work of a local MP.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    Charles said:



    I may have my precise dates wrong (it was before I was even a twinkle in my Dad's eye) but wasn't Alec a peer at the time he ran - i.e. he was in Parliament, even if not in the commons. Hailsham was certainly a peer when he ran against Alec.

    Douglas Home was indeed the 14th Earl of Home, a hereditary peer, when he became PM. He was able to disclaim the title and run for the HoC because the law allowing hereditaries to disclaim had just been passed and there was a window in which all had the opportunity to do so.

  • EasterrossEasterross Posts: 1,915
    Charles the Earl of Home was indeed a Peer and renounced his peerage to fight the Perthshire by-election which he won easily.

    Shouldn't Boris get selected to oppose Ed Davey if he wants to return to the Commons?

    However a caution to his ambition is that the further from the M25 one travels, the less the appeal of Boris exists. He would be very popular in the SE but of little political interest north of Birmingham where his career thus far has been marked by insulting communities who don't doff their caps to the all self-important London.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,112
    He could be MP for Cities of London and Westminster. Would fit nicely with his job title.
  • Sean_FSean_F Posts: 37,688

    The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. ).

    I wonder how he would put this intention over to his putative constituents? You have to understand that you are only going to be third on my priority list after the mayoralty and my leadership campaign? They might prefer another candidate who actually wanted to do the work of a local MP.
    If it were just for a year, I doubt if it would matter much.
  • I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP

    I can't imagine there's any association in a safe Home Counties seat which wouldn't be delighted to have him.
    How far out do you reckon? Saffron Walden in NE Essex should be available next time.

    That would do. Wealden and Tonbridge & Malling are both available, but they've both announced open primaries so it's probably too late to get selected without a contest.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    RobD said:

    He could be MP for Cities of London and Westminster. Would fit nicely with his job title.

    I'm not a huge fan of Mark Field, but is he stepping down?
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,671
    antifrank said:

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Would you really want to be leader of the Conservatives with a major rival on the backbenches who had been excluded from the leadership contest you won, who was highly ambitious and who much of the public suspected would have beaten you in a fair fight?

    The correct solution to this conundrum for any serious politician is to make sure Boris Johnson could stand and hope to beat him, not to try to hide behind party rules.
    If Boris is the best the Tories have to replace the hapless Cameron they are in real trouble. He may be a laugh but he will never be a PM.
  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,112
    Charles said:

    RobD said:

    He could be MP for Cities of London and Westminster. Would fit nicely with his job title.

    I'm not a huge fan of Mark Field, but is he stepping down?
    Ah I didn't mean to suggest that, sorry. Just wildly speculating.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    edited October 2013

    Cameron was giving huge hints this morning on Today that Boris would stand. I think they've done a deal.

    I heard that intv and agree - they've fixed something between them. I was wondering if Reigate was a possibility given the odd situation with Crispin. And of course there's Charles Hendry's seat vacant now too.
  • If Financier is around, would he like to comment on the post earlier,
    http://www.water-technology.net/projects/-ras-al-khair-desalination-plant/

    It will be the largest desalination plant of its kind in the world, capable of serving about 3.5 billion people in the city of Riyadh.

    3.5 billion? I didn't realise Riyadh was so big.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295
    edited October 2013
    Oh, I think Michael Brown got it right on the Daily Politics when he speculated that Boris will go for the Croydon NW seat to be vacated by Richard Ottaway**. As Brown noted, Boris could reasonably claim to be speaking for London in a London seat in his final year as London Mayor. And he will now definitely seek election in 2015.

    Cameron must be feeling reasonably optimistic about staying in No 10 for a second term (at least). Boris will not be his successor.

    **But I would hope he'd be beaten for selection by local boy made good Tory, namely our very own JohnLoony.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    edited October 2013
    malcolmg said:

    antifrank said:

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Would you really want to be leader of the Conservatives with a major rival on the backbenches who had been excluded from the leadership contest you won, who was highly ambitious and who much of the public suspected would have beaten you in a fair fight?

    The correct solution to this conundrum for any serious politician is to make sure Boris Johnson could stand and hope to beat him, not to try to hide behind party rules.
    If Boris is the best the Tories have to replace the hapless Cameron they are in real trouble. He may be a laugh but he will never be Mayor of London .
    Fixed that post to reflect a gazillion made in 2006, 2007 and 2008.



  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited October 2013

    Anyone who saw Boris interviewed by Paxman last night would surely say that the idea of him ever becoming PM is laughable. He'll return to the Commons, but his star is not shining as brightly as it was.

    True enough but then you look at the rest of the tory 'candidates' and it's easy to see why he's still spoken of in those terms. They are not overburdened with a wealth of talent or charisma.

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    edited October 2013

    Anyone who saw Boris interviewed by Paxman last night would surely say that the idea of him ever becoming PM is laughable. He'll return to the Commons, but his star is not shining as brightly as it was.

    Again - there was a plethora of PB lefties gleefully spouting the same when his chances of becoming mayor came around.

    Boris could be just what the country wants in 2020.

  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    tim said:

    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    If you are suggesting there's already quite a file on the Sainted Dacre and his personal life (helped along by ex mail journos and staff) then that would be an invidious calumny not worthy of consideration.

    Probably. ;^ )
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,854

    I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP

    I can't imagine there's any association in a safe Home Counties seat which wouldn't be delighted to have him.
    How far out do you reckon? Saffron Walden in NE Essex should be available next time.

    That would do. Wealden and Tonbridge & Malling are both available, but they've both announced open primaries so it's probably too late to get selected without a contest.
    Big scrap with UKIP I would have thought. Given the fact that he's be an absentee MP to deal with his London committments ........


  • Big scrap with UKIP I would have thought. Given the fact that he's be an absentee MP to deal with his London committments ........

    Boris would have no trouble with UKIP or indeed anyone else. He's immensely popular, and even people who think he's a bit flighty wouldn't be able to resist the charm and entertainment value. Also, even though his politics are virtually indistinguishable from Cameron's (and, where they do differ, he tends to be slightly to the left of Cameron), for some strange reason the UKIP-leaning tendency still think of him as more of a 'proper' Tory than Cameron. It makes no sense, but what does in politics?
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,671
    TGOHF said:

    Anyone who saw Boris interviewed by Paxman last night would surely say that the idea of him ever becoming PM is laughable. He'll return to the Commons, but his star is not shining as brightly as it was.

    Again - there was a plethora of PB lefties gleefully spouting the same when his chances of becoming mayor came around.

    Boris could be just what the country wants in 2020.

    Maybe what London wants but unlikely elsewhere , you are dreaming
  • macisbackmacisback Posts: 382
    Pork,

    I would confidently state there is currently a lot more talent on the Tory Front bench than Labour, lot's more options Gove, May, Bojo, even Os is now looking the part. Who have Labour got Cooper comes second to May in the Commons, Umunna surely not, Balls, Burnham, no more needs saying. Who else the cupboard looks bare.
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    malcolmg said:

    TGOHF said:

    Anyone who saw Boris interviewed by Paxman last night would surely say that the idea of him ever becoming PM is laughable. He'll return to the Commons, but his star is not shining as brightly as it was.

    Again - there was a plethora of PB lefties gleefully spouting the same when his chances of becoming mayor came around.

    Boris could be just what the country wants in 2020.

    Maybe what London wants but unlikely elsewhere , you are dreaming
    Perhaps he could find a nice seat in Liverpool.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    malcolmg said:

    TGOHF said:

    Anyone who saw Boris interviewed by Paxman last night would surely say that the idea of him ever becoming PM is laughable. He'll return to the Commons, but his star is not shining as brightly as it was.

    Again - there was a plethora of PB lefties gleefully spouting the same when his chances of becoming mayor came around.

    Boris could be just what the country wants in 2020.

    Maybe what London wants but unlikely elsewhere , you are dreaming
    Don't forget he's the darling of the tory grassroots and though he certainly doesn't have that kind of support from tory MPs he still has enough clout to be at the very least a kingmaker of sorts at the next tory leadership contest.

    His main stumbling block will be IN or OUT of Europe as he is very close to the city where OUT is not viewed with the same kind of fervour as with most of the tory grassroots.

  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,191
    Boris standing in 2015 in a London seat might be worth more than 1 London marginal for the tories. What more incentive does Cameron need than that?

    If Cameron loses Boris will be the man who can win in hostile territory. If Cameron wins he gets a chance to get a cabinet level job and burnish his credentials for leadership when Cameron stands down. It all looks win win and pretty inevitable to me.
  • anothernickanothernick Posts: 3,591
    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,587
    Personally, even as a Labour voter, I wouldn't get worked up about Boris doing two jobs for a year. It's not as though he does anything full-time anyway.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited October 2013
    macisback said:

    even Os is now looking the part.

    His personal polling says quite the opposite.

    May is getting plaudits for not making a complete mess of the Home Sec job which is a notorious graveyard of ministers while Gove shares Osbrowne's amusing ability to repulse voters. Boris has built up a powerbase in London.However, that isn't the same as building a powerbase in westminster and he would struggle with tory MPs suspicious of his flashy and mercurial ways until he had done some more time courting them.

    As for Labour, that would be their problem, though Cooper is every bit as viable as May is.
    That might not be saying much but it could be enough in a fallow field.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Mr. Palmer, Brown was also a strong advocate for full-time MPs. How often does he turn up to vote and speak in the Commons?
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?
    Why, are they planning on standing for PM?

    Otherwise, if you don't like The Daily Mail, refuse to buy the paper or visit the website.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295

    Personally, even as a Labour voter, I wouldn't get worked up about Boris doing two jobs for a year. It's not as though he does anything full-time anyway.

    Meowww (Cats' Protection League certified) from never off-message Labour candidate.

  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    If I were a professional politician, I too would be driven insane by jealousy at Boris Johnson's effortless ability to cut through to the public in minutes in a way that almost no politicians ever achieve, no matter how many backroom committees they sit on.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    edited October 2013
    tim said:

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?

    There is no record of Peter Dacre fighting Nazis it appears

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1425528/Peter-Dacre.html




    How 'On Message' tim.

    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    http://tompride.co.uk/while-ralph-miliband-was-fighting-in-normandy-paul-dacre-s-father-was-avoiding-the-front-line

    Hardly a coincidence.
  • JohnLilburneJohnLilburne Posts: 6,343
    Sean_F said:

    The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. ).

    I wonder how he would put this intention over to his putative constituents? You have to understand that you are only going to be third on my priority list after the mayoralty and my leadership campaign? They might prefer another candidate who actually wanted to do the work of a local MP.
    If it were just for a year, I doubt if it would matter much.
    After all, plenty of MPs who will be standing down after 2015 are probably already doing sweet FA.

    He will presumably be able to do as much MP work as a Cabinet Minister - if you can double up MP and Secretary of State I don't see why you can't double up MP and mayor of a city.

  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293
    macisback said:

    Pork,

    I would confidently state there is currently a lot more talent on the Tory Front bench than Labour, lot's more options Gove, May, Bojo, even Os is now looking the part. Who have Labour got Cooper comes second to May in the Commons, Umunna surely not, Balls, Burnham, no more needs saying. Who else the cupboard looks bare.

    But this is entirely understandable, Labour has gone through a generation and a half of ministers. In thirteen years, anyone who was any good has risen and fallen. What's left is this lickspittle of an old tired regime.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295
    SeanT said:

    antifrank said:

    If I were a professional politician, I too would be driven insane by jealousy at Boris Johnson's effortless ability to cut through to the public in minutes in a way that almost no politicians ever achieve, no matter how many backroom committees they sit on.

    Now now. That wouldn't be aimed at our very own Nick Palmer, would it?

    Tut!
    Never foget that our Nick can command legions of devoted "Tories for Palmer" to ever greater electoral triumphs.
  • notmenotme Posts: 3,293

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?
    Every single penny of tax due. If you think otherwise i suggest you let HMRC know.
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    taffys said:

    It would never happen but it would be great to see Boris go up against a sitting high profile labour MP in a marginal (Morley and Outwood.......what entertainment that would be.....).

    It's the wrong seat. Balls would probably win. I could see Yorkshirefolk warming to Boris but more as a party leader than as a constituency MP. The right candidate would be someone more low-profile and constituency-focussed, preferably with a background in Yorkshire or thereabouts.
  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983


    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    I do believe he started it...
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?

    There is no record of Peter Dacre fighting Nazis it appears

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1425528/Peter-Dacre.html




    How 'On Message' tim.

    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    http://tompride.co.uk/while-ralph-miliband-was-fighting-in-normandy-paul-dacre-s-father-was-avoiding-the-front-line

    Hardly a coincidence.

    We note your attacks on a man who fought the Nazis and defence of the one who didn't.
    Says quite a bit about you.
    Why not start a Labour for Adolphe campaign ?
  • Sean_F said:

    The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. ).

    I wonder how he would put this intention over to his putative constituents? You have to understand that you are only going to be third on my priority list after the mayoralty and my leadership campaign? They might prefer another candidate who actually wanted to do the work of a local MP.
    If it were just for a year, I doubt if it would matter much.
    After all, plenty of MPs who will be standing down after 2015 are probably already doing sweet FA.

    He will presumably be able to do as much MP work as a Cabinet Minister - if you can double up MP and Secretary of State I don't see why you can't double up MP and mayor of a city.

    It worked for Comrade Ken during his first term as Mayor.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Vivalatabloid @tabloidtroll
    Ed Miliband story only the 17th most read story on @MailOnline today. So much for the rubbish on here about a backlash. Readers don't care.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?

    There is no record of Peter Dacre fighting Nazis it appears

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1425528/Peter-Dacre.html




    How 'On Message' tim.

    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    http://tompride.co.uk/while-ralph-miliband-was-fighting-in-normandy-paul-dacre-s-father-was-avoiding-the-front-line

    Hardly a coincidence.

    We note your attacks on a man who fought the Nazis and defence of the one who didn't.
    Says quite a bit about you.
    Excellent. Smearing me too.

    You really can't help yourself can you?
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    antifrank said:

    If I were a professional politician, I too would be driven insane by jealousy at Boris Johnson's effortless ability to cut through to the public in minutes in a way that almost no politicians ever achieve, no matter how many backroom committees they sit on.

    Well spotted. ;)
    In the meantime, Boris has continued to cultivate his popularity among Tory activists - endorsing a more red-blooded defence of Thatcherite principles like opposing the 50p tax rate and over-regulation of the City. In true Etonian style, Johnson's remorseless ambition has a screen of nonchalance. Gimson says: "He doesn't spend his time plotting. He hasn't surrounded himself with henchmen.

    "There are no real ‘Johnson-ites' in the Commons. Of course that creates problems too. The general attitude among a lot of Tory MPs towards him is a mixture of suspicion and envy. They're jealous because Boris has made it without attending masses of ghastly committee meetings."

    http://www.totalpolitics.com/print/4518/divide-to-rule.thtml
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    JohnO said:



    Cameron must be feeling reasonably optimistic about staying in No 10 for a second term (at least). Boris will not be his successor.

    So you are saying that Dave is innumerate?

  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699

    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?

    There is no record of Peter Dacre fighting Nazis it appears

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1425528/Peter-Dacre.html




    How 'On Message' tim.

    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    http://tompride.co.uk/while-ralph-miliband-was-fighting-in-normandy-paul-dacre-s-father-was-avoiding-the-front-line

    Hardly a coincidence.

    We note your attacks on a man who fought the Nazis and defence of the one who didn't.
    Says quite a bit about you.
    Excellent. Smearing me too.

    You really can't help yourself can you?
    You are doing a pretty good job of besmirching yourself .
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Adam Boulton @adamboultonSKY
    McBride's book hits Sunday Times @ST_Newsroom best seller list but CAFOD turn down his cash catholicherald.co.uk/news/2013/10/0…
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    Plato said:

    Vivalatabloid @tabloidtroll
    Ed Miliband story only the 17th most read story on @MailOnline today. So much for the rubbish on here about a backlash. Readers don't care.

    storm in a teacup, who actually cares ? The idiot Maguire was trying to spin it that the Tories were upset since it spoilt their conference coverage, I'd be very surprised if anyone could get that angry for laughing.
  • JohnOJohnO Posts: 4,295

    JohnO said:



    Cameron must be feeling reasonably optimistic about staying in No 10 for a second term (at least). Boris will not be his successor.

    So you are saying that Dave is innumerate?

    What are you on about?
  • Neil said:


    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    I do believe he started it...
    He started it? Did he invade Poland?
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?

    There is no record of Peter Dacre fighting Nazis it appears

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1425528/Peter-Dacre.html




    How 'On Message' tim.

    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    http://tompride.co.uk/while-ralph-miliband-was-fighting-in-normandy-paul-dacre-s-father-was-avoiding-the-front-line

    Hardly a coincidence.

    We note your attacks on a man who fought the Nazis and defence of the one who didn't.
    Says quite a bit about you.
    Why not start a Labour for Adolphe campaign ?
    Sky News are doing quite a good job already
    Well, there you go and to think of all the nasty things Ed said against the Murdochs and here they are side by side with Ed and protecting his dad. Sometimes there's just no justice.
  • felixfelix Posts: 15,180
    Neil said:


    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    I do believe he started it...
    And of course that makes it acceptable - I'm sure that was Macbride' s excuse initially.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    Hmm

    Harry Cole @MrHarryCole
    Labour are now data harvesting for the election on the back of this row. Read into that what you will.

    Matthew Holehouse
    @mattholehouse
    @MrHarryCole A pattern. Goes submarine for about three months then surfaces to properly needle someone, while seizing the high ground.
  • old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    edited October 2013
    Ah, that explains some of the reasons why the comments are moderated.

    tim said:

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?

    There is no record of Peter Dacre fighting Nazis it appears

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1425528/Peter-Dacre.html




    How 'On Message' tim.

    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    http://tompride.co.uk/while-ralph-miliband-was-fighting-in-normandy-paul-dacre-s-father-was-avoiding-the-front-line

    Hardly a coincidence.
  • john_zimsjohn_zims Posts: 3,399
    edited October 2013
    @TheWatcher

    'In 1944 when the 22-year old Ralph Miliband was bravely risking his life storming German positions protecting the Normandy beaches,'

    Did Ed mention the storming of the Normandy beaches before?
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    Charles said:

    Difficult decision for BoJo. But an easy tease for Cameron.

    If BoJo seeks nomination for 2015 he will have to either double up as mayor and MP or resign as mayor before his term ends.
    If he doubles up he will be criticised for not taking the mayoralty seriously and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he resigns he will be accused of abandoning ship and going back on his commitment to serve a full mayoral term and this will damage his leadership chances.
    If he does not stand in 2015 he is unlikely to be an MP for the next Tory leadership contest and this will damage his leadership chances.

    I am sure this interesting conundrum has not not escaped the notice of his potential rivals.

    Not sure about the contention on doubling-up. The easy thing would be to put the MP's job on the backburner, providing he was up front about being a largely absent MP for his first year. I suspect that one of the safe Home Counties seats would accept that as part of the deal for having him as an MP (after all, he did much the same when he remained editor of The Spectator while an MP last time).

    While I agree with antifrank that the rules would probably be changed were Boris to see out his term and the Tories to lose office in 2015, it'd still be more difficult for him to win while outside parliament (though there is precedent: Douglas-Home became leader in that position).
    I may have my precise dates wrong (it was before I was even a twinkle in my Dad's eye) but wasn't Alec a peer at the time he ran - i.e. he was in Parliament, even if not in the commons. Hailsham was certainly a peer when he ran against Alec.
    Technically it was the other way round. Hailsham renounced his peerage during the 1963 Conservative conference, just before which Macmillan had announced his intention to step down even though he was Leader of the Lords; Home, who was Foreign Secretary, did not renounce his peerage until after he was appointed - so ensuring he could continue in the cabinet were he not selected (though Hogg also won a by-election shortly after and was re-appointed to the cabinet).

    Even so, it was clear that if either was made PM, they'd have to enter the Commons and so effectively neither had a secure seat in parliament when they were appointed PM, and, by association, party leader.
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    john_zims said:

    @TheWatcher

    'In 1944 when the 22-year old Ralph Miliband was bravely risking his life storming German positions protecting the Normandy beaches,'

    Did Ed mention the storming of the Normandy beaches before?

    He'll be a Spitfire pilot by tomorrow.

  • BobajobBobajob Posts: 1,536
    Plato said:

    Vivalatabloid @tabloidtroll
    Ed Miliband story only the 17th most read story on @MailOnline today. So much for the rubbish on here about a backlash. Readers don't care.

    Five hours ago you were pontificating that this was bad for Ed who was "making it even worse" for himself, now you are spinning that no one cares.

    Unspoofable - you are so ridiculous it's not longer even fun pointing it out.

  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    Bobajob said:

    Plato said:

    Vivalatabloid @tabloidtroll
    Ed Miliband story only the 17th most read story on @MailOnline today. So much for the rubbish on here about a backlash. Readers don't care.

    Five hours ago you were pontificating that this was bad for Ed who was "making it even worse" for himself, now you are spinning that no one cares.

    Unspoofable - you are so ridiculous it's not longer even fun pointing it out.

    Then don't.
  • MarkSeniorMarkSenior Posts: 4,699
    john_zims said:

    @TheWatcher

    'In 1944 when the 22-year old Ralph Miliband was bravely risking his life storming German positions protecting the Normandy beaches,'

    Did Ed mention the storming of the Normandy beaches before?

    and Dacre's father was storming the defenses of London showgirls
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,953
    Mick_Pork said:

    antifrank said:

    If I were a professional politician, I too would be driven insane by jealousy at Boris Johnson's effortless ability to cut through to the public in minutes in a way that almost no politicians ever achieve, no matter how many backroom committees they sit on.

    Well spotted. ;)
    In the meantime, Boris has continued to cultivate his popularity among Tory activists - endorsing a more red-blooded defence of Thatcherite principles like opposing the 50p tax rate and over-regulation of the City. In true Etonian style, Johnson's remorseless ambition has a screen of nonchalance. Gimson says: "He doesn't spend his time plotting. He hasn't surrounded himself with henchmen.

    "There are no real ‘Johnson-ites' in the Commons. Of course that creates problems too. The general attitude among a lot of Tory MPs towards him is a mixture of suspicion and envy. They're jealous because Boris has made it without attending masses of ghastly committee meetings."

    http://www.totalpolitics.com/print/4518/divide-to-rule.thtml
    Do not underestimate the ability of Tory MPs to back the candidate they think most likely to give them the biggest possible majority at the next general election (which is not necessarily the same as the one that will do so).
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited October 2013
    Great news for the PB Hodges. Truly these two are made for each other. ;^ )
    Andrew Spooner ‏@andrewspoooner 1h

    And given how close Lynton Crosby and Dan Hodges are I wouldn't be surprised if Dan had a hand in the Ralph Miliband smear either.

    Now, now. Let's not get into the blame game of who has been leaking to who against little Ed. Yet again. Next thing you know someone will be saying Tom Harris didn't quit to spend more time with his family. ;)
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724

    john_zims said:

    @TheWatcher

    'In 1944 when the 22-year old Ralph Miliband was bravely risking his life storming German positions protecting the Normandy beaches,'

    Did Ed mention the storming of the Normandy beaches before?

    He'll be a Spitfire pilot by tomorrow.

    LOL
  • AlanbrookeAlanbrooke Posts: 25,658
    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    tim said:

    P
    Is Dacre in favour of Mail traditional values then?
    We should be told.

    What did his father do during the war?

    And how much UK tax is paid by the Mail group and its proprietors?

    There is no record of Peter Dacre fighting Nazis it appears

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/obituaries/1425528/Peter-Dacre.html




    How 'On Message' tim.

    I see your fellow travellers are busy smearing Dacre across the web.

    http://tompride.co.uk/while-ralph-miliband-was-fighting-in-normandy-paul-dacre-s-father-was-avoiding-the-front-line

    Hardly a coincidence.

    We note your attacks on a man who fought the Nazis and defence of the one who didn't.
    Says quite a bit about you.
    Excellent. Smearing me too.

    You really can't help yourself can you?
    It's your choice to go on a website and attack as unpatriotic a man who fought the Nazis after volunteering for the British Navy while simultaneously protesting about people pointing out that the father of the editor leading the attacks did not fight for his country against Nazism despite being the same age as the man you've been attacking.

    That says quite a lot about you.
    And the Editor of the newspaper with a history of supporting Nazis


    would that be the editor Labour appointed to head an independent inquiry ?
  • old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    edited October 2013
    While the Great Patriot was going up to Oxford to serve her Mr Whippy apprenticeship and Peter Dacre was doing essential war work keeping up the morale of the chorus line, [Ralph Miliband]

    ...aware of the fact that many of his Belgian comrades were engaged in the war against Fascism and traumatised by the absence of his mother and sister, had volunteered (for naval service), using Laski's influence to override the bureaucracy.

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/people/obituary-professor-ralph-miliband-1438110.html
  • TheWatcherTheWatcher Posts: 5,262
    edited October 2013
    "It's your choice to go on a website and attack as unpatriotic a man who fought the Nazis"

    Please feel free to highlight that post tim.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,061
    Mr. Labour, as an aside, it's interesting to consider how conscription would work if we faced such a need.

    Would women be conscripted too, with a narrowing of the age band to enable more men and women to stay at home?
  • not_on_firenot_on_fire Posts: 4,449
    Plato said:

    Vivalatabloid @tabloidtroll
    Ed Miliband story only the 17th most read story on @MailOnline today. So much for the rubbish on here about a backlash. Readers don't care.

    Those figures include the US version of MailOnline.
  • PlatoPlato Posts: 15,724
    I caught this earlier http://blogs.spectator.co.uk/coffeehouse/2013/10/eric-pickles-increases-support-for-generation-rent/

    "Berry’s idea was a ‘New Deal for Generation Rent’, and he also wrote about this for us in January. He wanted longer-term tenancies to help families stay in the same home, rather than having to up sticks and even move schools when the landlord raised the rent or decided to end the tenancy. He has been working on the ideas since joining the board, and is now celebrating seeing them move into official government policy. Under a new ‘tenants’ charter’, families will be able to request longer tenancies from their landlords. It’s a good example of one of the little things that the Tories need to be making a song and dance about to show that they care about hardworking families, but it’s also an example of the policy board starting to do its job.
  • Mick_PorkMick_Pork Posts: 6,530
    edited October 2013

    Mick_Pork said:

    antifrank said:

    If I were a professional politician, I too would be driven insane by jealousy at Boris Johnson's effortless ability to cut through to the public in minutes in a way that almost no politicians ever achieve, no matter how many backroom committees they sit on.

    Well spotted. ;)
    In the meantime, Boris has continued to cultivate his popularity among Tory activists - endorsing a more red-blooded defence of Thatcherite principles like opposing the 50p tax rate and over-regulation of the City. In true Etonian style, Johnson's remorseless ambition has a screen of nonchalance. Gimson says: "He doesn't spend his time plotting. He hasn't surrounded himself with henchmen.

    "There are no real ‘Johnson-ites' in the Commons. Of course that creates problems too. The general attitude among a lot of Tory MPs towards him is a mixture of suspicion and envy. They're jealous because Boris has made it without attending masses of ghastly committee meetings."

    http://www.totalpolitics.com/print/4518/divide-to-rule.thtml
    Do not underestimate the ability of Tory MPs to back the candidate they think most likely to give them the biggest possible majority at the next general election (which is not necessarily the same as the one that will do so).


    I don't any more than I discount it for all those lib dem MPs who are looking extinction in the face under Clegg.

    Boris current lack of a devoted coterie among tory MPs is not insurmountable but it's a problem.

    Tory MPs also have a habit of not giving a monkey's about electability when Euroscepticism or even some other issues/personal animosity are in play. As the likes of Clarke, Portillo and several other prospective tory leaders know all too well.

This discussion has been closed.