I’ve been in London all day and have only just viewed the above for myself – the comment from the Defence Secretary, Gavin Williamson that Russia should just “go away and shut up”. Apparently this wasn’t just a spur of the moment comment but one that he had drafted before.
Comments
https://twitter.com/samcoatestimes/status/974406839931686913?s=21
https://twitter.com/samcoatestimes/status/974406839931686913?s=21
*Actually quite surprisng to look back. For every 9/11 Bush bounce, there are four events with little or no discernible impact.
It’s like having Rainbow’s Bungle the Bear and Zippy in charge.
I mean “in charge” only loosely of course.
The VI for this poll pretty similar to ones we’ve been getting since January.
In terms of polling, a lot depends on what happens next.
The primary impact will be to unify the Tories, and create problems in Labour ranks, which will then be felt down the line.
https://twitter.com/iainmarlow/status/974158418016534528
We agree with the government’s action in relation to Russian diplomats, but measures to tackle the oligarchs and their loot would have a far greater impact on Russia’s elite than limited tit-for-tat expulsions. We are willing to back further sanctions as and when the investigation into the Salisbury attack produces results.
They know alright. They know they have a prize pillock as leader.
Didn't stop him denying the Tories a majority last June and making net gains.
I voted for Kendall.
https://twitter.com/MSmithsonPB/status/974413367417896960
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Belisha_beacon
You can't trust him, if he can betray his wife he can betray his country.
The bloke's a honeytrap in the making.
The RT chap is failing to get any positive response from the audience.
“And in Gloucester tonight, former MP Oswald Mosley, popular broadcaster Lord Haw-Haw, and German ambassador Joachim von Ribbentrop. And the first question comes from a lady in the audience...yes, you with the swastika armband.”
I have always been a firm believer in not overreacting to things, and in foreign relations that clearly applies even more than in most areas, you have to be cold and rational sometimes for the sake of larger goals. But what does annoy me is when people are so concerned about overreacting that they criticise purported overreaction so early that they are, in effect, arguing against a reaction not an overrreaction. It puts me most in mind of how the NRA immediately paints any reaction to a gun massacre as an overreaction.
Sending some diplomats home and speaking angry words - where we believe culpability is 'highly likely' from a certain source - is not exactly disproportionate escalation, so other than what is bound to be people mouthing off on twitter and what, one minister making a less than dignified statement of the type the Russians seem to be full of, what exactly makes people think we have overreacted? Unless one thinks we are just making up what has happened the reaction has not been extreme (and no, that does not mean people cannot question events to some degree).
Williamson's appointment (like BJs) was one of those May mysteries to me. A post that should have gravitas (Trident) occupied by an immature Adrian Mole type character - I suppose it makes May appear stateswomanlike. I can only see Williamson ending up as leader - on the opposition benches