Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » So crunch day on Russia for the PM

12467

Comments

  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737

    Corbyn’s craven words will draw attention away from the fact that the government has actually done little to attack the Russians where it will actually hurt.

    It seems a suitable initial response. What else do you think she should do?

    Money, money, money.

  • glwglw Posts: 9,993
    HYUFD said:

    How long can labour mps put up with Corbyn

    The vast majority never wanted him in the first place but it is Labour members who keep Corbyn in place
    It's about time that these Labour MPs had a look at plan A B C D E F G H I J K again and consider whether they should form their own party.
  • You have to wonder what Corbyn’s response would be if the Irish Republicans resumed their attacks?

    Actually you don’t have to wonder do you?
  • Is Corbyn for real - I accept that I do not support him but today he is again being taken to the cleaners by TM

    on the NHS....

    This is akin to last night's Man Utd performance
    I claim credit by bigging up his confidence and improved ability a couple of weeks ago. it's all gone wrong for him since then.
    Well played!
  • Yvette Cooper hits Corbyn where it hurts
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,254
    PClipp said:

    PClipp said:

    She says there is “no place” for the corrupt elites in the UK.

    What? Mrs May actually said that, Mr Navabi?

    She is right of course.... but what then will happen to the Conservative Party?
    There are times when political point scoring is childish
    I am glad you realise that, Mr Wal

    PClipp said:

    She says there is “no place” for the corrupt elites in the UK.

    What? Mrs May actually said that, Mr Navabi?

    She is right of course.... but what then will happen to the Conservative Party?
    There are times when political point scoring is childish
    I am glad you realise that, Mr Wales. At last!
    You provide a perfect example of why the LibDems are without relevence in Britain today.
  • AndrewAndrew Posts: 2,900
    edited March 2018

    You have to wonder what Corbyn’s response would be if the Irish Republicans resumed their attacks?

    He might publically restrain himself from cheering. Maybe.
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737
    glw said:

    HYUFD said:

    How long can labour mps put up with Corbyn

    The vast majority never wanted him in the first place but it is Labour members who keep Corbyn in place
    It's about time that these Labour MPs had a look at plan A B C D E F G H I J K again and consider whether they should form their own party.

    Corbyn knows he can’t rely on the PLP. There’ll be mass reselections before the next GE and the new party will emerge from these.

  • Yvette Cooper is the de facto leader of the Labour backbench party.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,213
    edited March 2018

    Yvette Cooper hits Corbyn where it hurts

    On Daily Politics. What did she say?
  • AlsoIndigoAlsoIndigo Posts: 1,852
    edited March 2018
    Pulpstar said:

    Am I safe from the blast radius of 3 missiles targeting London, Barrow and the Clyde in Sheffield ?

    Did you ever see a movie called "Threads" ? (caution)
  • glwglw Posts: 9,993

    Corbyn’s craven words will draw attention away from the fact that the government has actually done little to attack the Russians where it will actually hurt.

    It seems a suitable initial response. What else do you think she should do?

    Money, money, money.

    May said there will be ammendments to a bill for a UK "Magnitsky act", the NCA are going on the warpath, and we will freeze Russian state assets where appropriate. Today's headline is the diplomats being expelled, but there's more to it than that.

    Personally I would like all this to happen today, but I accept that legislation will be needed in some cases, and legal processes need to be followed in others.
  • rkrkrkrkrkrk Posts: 8,406

    glw said:

    HYUFD said:

    How long can labour mps put up with Corbyn

    The vast majority never wanted him in the first place but it is Labour members who keep Corbyn in place
    It's about time that these Labour MPs had a look at plan A B C D E F G H I J K again and consider whether they should form their own party.

    Corbyn knows he can’t rely on the PLP. There’ll be mass reselections before the next GE and the new party will emerge from these.

    Any interest in a bet on that?
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    You have to wonder what Corbyn’s response would be if the Irish Republicans resumed their attacks?

    Actually you don’t have to wonder do you?

    We'd have meaningful conversations with both sides
  • DavidL said:

    Yvette Cooper hits Corbyn where it hurts

    On Daily Politics. What did she say?
    In the House fully backing TM
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,069
    Wonder how the media will portray this. On the Monday session, ITV News referred overtly to Corbyn's response and his backbenchers' dismay, (didn't show him saying it, though).

    His cultists won't care. Labour tribalists might. There's loyalty to a party brand, and antipathy to the Conservatives, but siding with a foreign state deemed responsible for the use of nerve agent on UK soil and potentially putting many British citizens at risk in Salisbury is quite something else. Hmm.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    You have to wonder what Corbyn’s response would be if the Irish Republicans resumed their attacks?

    "Put the foot down Gerry ! the PSNI are right behind us.."

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,216
    DavidL said:

    Looks like RT keeps it’s license for now. Salmond will be relieved.

    Its not up to the government - its up to Ofcom & they're looking at it.....the description by the PM that the Russian govt did it is probably enough to get it pulled...
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,602
    Bullseye host Jim Bowen joins Stephen Hawking at the pearly gates today

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-43403178
  • glwglw Posts: 9,993

    You have to wonder what Corbyn’s response would be if the Irish Republicans resumed their attacks?

    Actually you don’t have to wonder do you?

    Russia has used a radiological weapon and a chemical weapon, so what next? What would PM Corbyn do if smallpox, anthrax, or a superflu hailing from Biopreparat was used in the UK? He's equivocate.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,069
    Mr. HYUFD, I hope he isn't saying to Hawking "Have a look at what you could've won...":
  • DUP accuses Lab front bench of appeasement
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,617

    Mr. HYUFD, I hope he isn't saying to Hawking "Have a look at what you could've won...":

    What a great program Bullseye was. No expense spared on the prizes back in the day.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,602

    You have to wonder what Corbyn’s response would be if the Irish Republicans resumed their attacks?

    Actually you don’t have to wonder do you?

    Corbyn would be the first PM to redirect MI6 spies to Washington and Brussels rather than Moscow and Beijing and the Middle East.

    The army would end up having to take an Oath of Loyalty to the Socialist values of the People rather than the monarch
  • DavidL said:

    Looks like RT keeps it’s license for now. Salmond will be relieved.

    Its not up to the government - its up to Ofcom & they're looking at it.....the description by the PM that the Russian govt did it is probably enough to get it pulled...
    Hopefully Sputnik will also get closed down in London and Edinburgh
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,602

    Mr. HYUFD, I hope he isn't saying to Hawking "Have a look at what you could've won...":

    I expect Hawking would enjoy the banter
  • I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,817
    Leading Bild Journalist calls Corbyn a useful idiot and Kremlin stooge.
    https://twitter.com/JulianRoepcke/status/973911686951391232
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,981

    Mr. NorthWales, I heard somewhere that during the war, Welshmen were specially employed to converse over the telephone, as the Germans had no idea what they were saying.

    I think that was the case in the Falklands too?
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,069
    Mr. Glenn, interesting, didn't know useful idiot was a phrase in German too.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,254

    Mr. HYUFD, I hope he isn't saying to Hawking "Have a look at what you could've won...":

    Although, I'm not sure his chair would have got through the caravan's door.
  • Stark_DawningStark_Dawning Posts: 9,762
    I'm getting nervous here. We know that Jezza and Vlad are good muckers. Perhaps Vlad has secretly told Jezza that Russia genuinely wasn't behind it. Jezza has taken this line so that when it comes out that Russia is in the clear he will look like a statesman while Theresa will look like a warmongering nincompoop. Vlad would be that devious. Is there any other explanation?
  • Carolus_RexCarolus_Rex Posts: 1,414

    I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    Sadly there's no way it can be. What would the equivalent of white flags over Stanley look like in this situation? Putin saying "Sorry, yes we did do it" and handing over his agents for trial? Can't see that happening.
  • Ben Bradshaw socks it to Corbyn
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,254
    Ben Bradshaw, Labour "Can I assure the Prime Minister she has the support of most of us on these benches....."
  • I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    Nah, Mrs Thatcher hadn't lost her majority prior to her Falkland Islands moment.
  • HYUFDHYUFD Posts: 124,602

    I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    At least Foot ended up backing sending a taskforce with rather less reservations than Corbyn had about the expulsions today.

    If Corbyn becomes PM, especially without a majority there must be a slim chance of a military coup if he is seen to go too far
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,254
    edited March 2018
    Labour MPs lining up to express their support for May.

    EDIT: Even Anna Soubry!!
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,817

    Mr. Glenn, interesting, didn't know useful idiot was a phrase in German too.

    It was originally coined in Russian and generally attributed to Lenin although without a precise source.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844
    I have travelling back from a regular hospital trip and so have not been able to follow live. But it does seem from reports that Corbyn could not have got this more tonally wrong. Today wasn't the time for party politics. It was the day to say ''Oi! You can't do that Mr Putin.'
  • I'm getting nervous here. We know that Jezza and Vlad are good muckers. Perhaps Vlad has secretly told Jezza that Russia genuinely wasn't behind it. Jezza has taken this line so that when it comes out that Russia is in the clear he will look like a statesman while Theresa will look like a warmongering nincompoop. Vlad would be that devious. Is there any other explanation?

    Yes - Corbyn is a closet Putinist
  • ElliotElliot Posts: 1,516
    glw said:

    Corbyn’s craven words will draw attention away from the fact that the government has actually done little to attack the Russians where it will actually hurt.

    It seems a suitable initial response. What else do you think she should do?

    Money, money, money.

    May said there will be ammendments to a bill for a UK "Magnitsky act", the NCA are going on the warpath, and we will freeze Russian state assets where appropriate. Today's headline is the diplomats being expelled, but there's more to it than that.

    Personally I would like all this to happen today, but I accept that legislation will be needed in some cases, and legal processes need to be followed in others.
    The issue is "where appropriate" seems to be a very limited definition as things stand. I hope May is holding actions back to retaliate to Russia's inevitable retaliation.
  • Chris Bryant again forcefully backs TM
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,617
    Daily Mail seems to be (Sort of) behind Corbyn in the comments section....
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    I'm getting nervous here. We know that Jezza and Vlad are good muckers. Perhaps Vlad has secretly told Jezza that Russia genuinely wasn't behind it. Jezza has taken this line so that when it comes out that Russia is in the clear he will look like a statesman while Theresa will look like a warmongering nincompoop. Vlad would be that devious. Is there any other explanation?

    Yes - Corbyn is a closet Putinist
    Corbyn desperately hopes Moscow isn't behind it, so he clings to putting HMG to a ludicrous level of proof?

    Like someone finding out their much loved entertainer is accused of being a pedophile.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786

    I'm getting nervous here. We know that Jezza and Vlad are good muckers. Perhaps Vlad has secretly told Jezza that Russia genuinely wasn't behind it. Jezza has taken this line so that when it comes out that Russia is in the clear he will look like a statesman while Theresa will look like a warmongering nincompoop. Vlad would be that devious. Is there any other explanation?

    Yes - Corbyn is a closet Putinist
    Trump and Corbyn, both usefull idiots or bought stooges? You decide
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    I don't think a LAB MP in the Commons has yet back Corbyn
  • williamglennwilliamglenn Posts: 52,817
    Pulpstar said:

    Daily Mail seems to be (Sort of) behind Corbyn in the comments section....

    I would guess the Daily Mail comments section is ground zero for Russian bots.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    Pulpstar said:

    Daily Mail seems to be (Sort of) behind Corbyn in the comments section....

    Russian bots out in force....
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844

    I'm getting nervous here. We know that Jezza and Vlad are good muckers. Perhaps Vlad has secretly told Jezza that Russia genuinely wasn't behind it. Jezza has taken this line so that when it comes out that Russia is in the clear he will look like a statesman while Theresa will look like a warmongering nincompoop. Vlad would be that devious. Is there any other explanation?

    Simple. Corbyn can't stand up for Britain. He just can't do it
  • SouthamObserverSouthamObserver Posts: 39,737

    I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    That’s about the 17th time you’ve called that this year!! :-)

    Today’s events have far more significance for Labour than for Mrs May. The measures announced are not going to cause much of a problem for Putin and do nothing to discomfit the oligarchs that surround him. The UK is in a weak position, unfortunately.

  • glwglw Posts: 9,993

    I have travelling back from a regular hospital trip and so have not been able to follow live. But it does seem from reports that Corbyn could not have got this more tonally wrong. Today wasn't the time for party politics. It was the day to say ''Oi! You can't do that Mr Putin.'

    Corbyn was worse on Monday, but he was still inadvertently parroting Russian talking points that are designed to muddy the waters.
  • MortimerMortimer Posts: 14,158

    I'm getting nervous here. We know that Jezza and Vlad are good muckers. Perhaps Vlad has secretly told Jezza that Russia genuinely wasn't behind it. Jezza has taken this line so that when it comes out that Russia is in the clear he will look like a statesman while Theresa will look like a warmongering nincompoop. Vlad would be that devious. Is there any other explanation?

    Yes, the obvious one, that Corbyn is wrong on this.
  • TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,889

    (This does give me my chance to argue that we've either already had WW3 or we've not yet had WW2).

    Am I right in thinking that in the latter case, you argue that WWI was a European civil war, and WWII was therefore WWI?

    What about the former?

  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 62,069
    Mr. Glenn, ah, cheers for that. Quite fitting, given current circumstances.
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    edited March 2018
    I see Corbyn has messed up again.

    Labour MPs lining up to express their support for May.

    EDIT: Even Anna Soubry!!

    It’s not shocking that Anna Soubry would support May on this.

    Tbh, all the Labour MPs publicly backing May that have been mentioned on here so far all seem to be Labour moderates.
  • I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    That’s about the 17th time you’ve called that this year!! :-)

    Today’s events have far more significance for Labour than for Mrs May. The measures announced are not going to cause much of a problem for Putin and do nothing to discomfit the oligarchs that surround him. The UK is in a weak position, unfortunately.

    I think you exaggerate somewhat but it is a big moment for the Country and TM is getting wide cross party support and that should be reflected in the Country
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 120,334
    edited March 2018
    If Corbyn collaborates any further people will think he’s French.
  • JWisemannJWisemann Posts: 1,082
    edited March 2018
    What is standing up for Britain? Our corrupt, venal security establishment and their pet war-obsessed politicians on both sides of the house, who have been caught lying multiple times and stand to benefit from increased tensions with Russia, or those who caution for a measured response based on real evidence, mindful of the negative repercussions potentially unnecessary increased tensions with Russia will have on the rest of us?
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    JWisemann said:

    What is standing up for Britain? Our corrupt, venal security establishment and their pet war-obsessed politicians on both sides of the house, who have been caught lying multiple times and stand to benefit from increased tensions with Russia, or those who caution for a measured response based on real evidence, mindful of the negative repercussions increased tensions with Russia will have on the rest of us?

    How much do you charge per post

    I would be willing to sell out for say a quid a time
  • Big_G_NorthWalesBig_G_NorthWales Posts: 64,064
    edited March 2018

    I see Corbyn has messed up again.

    Labour MPs lining up to express their support for May.

    EDIT: Even Anna Soubry!!

    It’s not shocking that Anna Soubry would support May on this.

    Tbh, all the Labour MPs publicly backing May that have been mentioned on here so far all seem to be Labour moderates.
    Not one labour mp has supported Corbyn
  • glwglw Posts: 9,993

    Trump and Corbyn, both usefull idiots or bought stooges? You decide

    Despite everything he has said I don't think Corbyn is a fan of Putin like Trump, Corbyn's views go way back, and his gullibility is driven by his long standing anti-Western views and hatred of the Tories. I'm sure Corbyn thinks he has been talking tough about Putin even as he has given some of the Russian viewpoints an airing.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    I see Corbyn has messed up again.

    Labour MPs lining up to express their support for May.

    EDIT: Even Anna Soubry!!

    It’s not shocking that Anna Soubry would support May on this.

    Tbh, all the Labour MPs publicly backing May that have been mentioned on here so far all seem to be Labour moderates.
    Yes, all speakers are moderates. But the jeers weren't all from them...
  • JWisemannJWisemann Posts: 1,082
    I'd suggest that you are wrong Mike, yet again, and that Corbyn's measured and grown-up response will go down better with a fair slice of the country than impotent and childish willy-waving in some sub-pound-shop Thatcher-in-1982 fashion.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    glw said:

    Trump and Corbyn, both usefull idiots or bought stooges? You decide

    Despite everything he has said I don't think Corbyn is a fan of Putin like Trump, Corbyn's views go way back, and his gullibility is driven by his long standing anti-Western views and hatred of the Tories. I'm sure Corbyn thinks he has been talking tough about Putin even as he has given some of the Russian viewpoints an airing.
    They come from different places I agree, but their positions end up remarkably similar
  • JWisemann said:

    I'd suggest that you are wrong Mike, yet again, and that Corbyn's measured and grown-up response will go down better with a fair slice of the country than impotent and childish willy-waving in some sub-pound-shop Thatcher-in-1982 fashion.

    What planet are you on
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    The Daily Mail comments section being a total mess isn’t really news.

    I do wonder how much this story is capturing public attention. Was shocked that my own family members didn’t seem to giving it much thought. Either way, we’ll find out in the coming weeks/months.
  • glwglw Posts: 9,993

    JWisemann said:

    What is standing up for Britain? Our corrupt, venal security establishment and their pet war-obsessed politicians on both sides of the house, who have been caught lying multiple times and stand to benefit from increased tensions with Russia, or those who caution for a measured response based on real evidence, mindful of the negative repercussions increased tensions with Russia will have on the rest of us?

    How much do you charge per post

    I would be willing to sell out for say a quid a time
    In reality a post like that wouldn't even get 10c with verification on a long established account. It's dirt cheap to abuse social media.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,213
    There really are 2 Labour parties in the HoC

    Christ Pat McFadden not missing Corbyn.
  • DavidL said:

    There really are 2 Labour parties in the HoC

    Christ Pat McFadden not missing Corbyn.

    The divisions in labour are all on display and is not sustainable
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830
    @TheWhiteRabbit I didn’t know there were jeers....wow. I wonder who isn’t speaking up then.

    @Big_G_NorthWales I have my doubts that the likes of Cat Smith and Laura Pidcock aren’t supporting the Corbyn line on this, unfortunately.
  • TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,889

    I'm sure it can all be resolved over a cup of tea and a biscuit with that nice Mr Putin.
    We said just the same a few minutes ago in our office.

    Bring your own teabags, water, mug and kettle though.......
  • @TheWhiteRabbit I didn’t know there were jeers....wow. I wonder who isn’t speaking up then.

    @Big_G_NorthWales I have my doubts that the likes of Cat Smith and Laura Pidcock aren’t supporting the Corbyn line on this, unfortunately.

    Yes but they are not publicly backing him
  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 52,350

    If Corbyn collaborates any further people will think he’s French.

    40,000 "German" soldiers at Stalingrad were actually Soviets.
  • SlackbladderSlackbladder Posts: 9,786
    glw said:

    Trump and Corbyn, both usefull idiots or bought stooges? You decide

    Despite everything he has said I don't think Corbyn is a fan of Putin like Trump, Corbyn's views go way back, and his gullibility is driven by his long standing anti-Western views and hatred of the Tories. I'm sure Corbyn thinks he has been talking tough about Putin even as he has given some of the Russian viewpoints an airing.
    Just like anti-semites, Corbyn surrounds himself with Putin-supporters.... He may not be a Putin supporter himself, but.......
  • Tissue_PriceTissue_Price Posts: 9,039

    I don't think a LAB MP in the Commons has yet back Corbyn

    Practically all the ones that do are on the frontbench: needs must. Except Williamson, who was advertising the Morning Star at PMQs.
  • JWisemannJWisemann Posts: 1,082

    The Daily Mail comments section being a total mess isn’t really news.

    I do wonder how much this story is capturing public attention. Was shocked that my own family members didn’t seem to giving it much thought. Either way, we’ll find out in the coming weeks/months.

    Outside the massively discredited and moribund Westminster bubble (proven wrong on almost everything over the last few years) and its irrelevant hangers-on who frequent this place, I imagine most people barely give a tinkers cuss. Got more important things to worry about, like why all public services seem to be crumbling into total destruction.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    I'm not sure that kicking out a few flunkeys or refusing to send a few flunkeys to Britain is really going to affect the price of herrings.

    As for Jeremy Corbyn, why is anyone surprised at his response?
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844
    Can anyone please remind me how to put certain posters on ignore?
  • JWisemannJWisemann Posts: 1,082

    Can anyone please remind me how to put certain posters on ignore?

    Can't handle the truth? :)
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,120

    I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    That’s about the 17th time you’ve called that this year!! :-)

    Today’s events have far more significance for Labour than for Mrs May. The measures announced are not going to cause much of a problem for Putin and do nothing to discomfit the oligarchs that surround him. The UK is in a weak position, unfortunately.


    Poor Big G is desperate for us all to look lovingly at our dear leader through his coloured glasses...

    Granted she is playing the politics of all this quite well, but seriously that is all she is doing. We need to go much further of course, but May's natural caution will stop it. There is no way we should be participating in the World Cup in a country sponsoring terrorism, murder led by criminals and thieves.

    But at the end of the day, her campaigning skills are utterly atrocious..Russia or no Russia.. and based purely on that she will not lead the Tories into another election...


  • glwglw Posts: 9,993

    The Daily Mail comments section being a total mess isn’t really news.

    I do wonder how much this story is capturing public attention. Was shocked that my own family members didn’t seem to giving it much thought. Either way, we’ll find out in the coming weeks/months.

    I think it isn't all that understandable to a lot of people. People have asked "is it contagious", and there's an element of "he deserved it". It's the recklessness of the Russian actions that is of greatest concern. If say the courier (there very likely was one) damaged the container for the substance on something like a plane or a train you could be talking about dozens of deaths.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454

    Nigel Farage
    @Nigel_Farage

    Mrs May has acted, quite rightly, against Russia. Not that it will make any difference.

  • TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,889
    Pulpstar said:

    Mr. HYUFD, I hope he isn't saying to Hawking "Have a look at what you could've won...":

    What a great program Bullseye was. No expense spared on the prizes back in the day.
    Except for the job lot of speedboats, for the Birmingham based winners.
  • JWisemann said:

    The Daily Mail comments section being a total mess isn’t really news.

    I do wonder how much this story is capturing public attention. Was shocked that my own family members didn’t seem to giving it much thought. Either way, we’ll find out in the coming weeks/months.

    Outside the massively discredited and moribund Westminster bubble (proven wrong on almost everything over the last few years) and its irrelevant hangers-on who frequent this place, I imagine most people barely give a tinkers cuss. Got more important things to worry about, like why all public services seem to be crumbling into total destruction.
    Keep consoling yourself by all means
  • david_herdsondavid_herdson Posts: 17,981

    I'm not sure that kicking out a few flunkeys or refusing to send a few flunkeys to Britain is really going to affect the price of herrings.

    As for Jeremy Corbyn, why is anyone surprised at his response?

    No, it won't. let's see what happens with sanctions.
  • The_ApocalypseThe_Apocalypse Posts: 7,830

    @TheWhiteRabbit I didn’t know there were jeers....wow. I wonder who isn’t speaking up then.

    @Big_G_NorthWales I have my doubts that the likes of Cat Smith and Laura Pidcock aren’t supporting the Corbyn line on this, unfortunately.

    Yes but they are not publicly backing him
    Give it time, I wouldn’t be surprised to see them do so at some point or another. Would be extraordinary for Corbyn if they weren’t backing his line though.
  • oxfordsimonoxfordsimon Posts: 5,844
    JWisemann said:

    Can anyone please remind me how to put certain posters on ignore?

    Can't handle the truth? :)
    I can't handle offensive stupidity. And you are both offensive and stupid.
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822

    glw said:

    Trump and Corbyn, both usefull idiots or bought stooges? You decide

    Despite everything he has said I don't think Corbyn is a fan of Putin like Trump, Corbyn's views go way back, and his gullibility is driven by his long standing anti-Western views and hatred of the Tories. I'm sure Corbyn thinks he has been talking tough about Putin even as he has given some of the Russian viewpoints an airing.
    They come from different places I agree, but their positions end up remarkably similar
    They come from quite similar places, they are were both supporters of the Soviet Union. Somewhat different career paths, though!
  • rpjsrpjs Posts: 3,787

    Pulpstar said:

    Mr. HYUFD, I hope he isn't saying to Hawking "Have a look at what you could've won...":

    What a great program Bullseye was. No expense spared on the prizes back in the day.
    Except for the job lot of speedboats, for the Birmingham based winners.
    Lot of canals running through Brum.
  • tyson said:

    I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    That’s about the 17th time you’ve called that this year!! :-)

    Today’s events have far more significance for Labour than for Mrs May. The measures announced are not going to cause much of a problem for Putin and do nothing to discomfit the oligarchs that surround him. The UK is in a weak position, unfortunately.


    Poor Big G is desperate for us all to look lovingly at our dear leader through his coloured glasses...

    Granted she is playing the politics of all this quite well, but seriously that is all she is doing. We need to go much further of course, but May's natural caution will stop it. There is no way we should be participating in the World Cup in a country sponsoring terrorism, murder led by criminals and thieves.

    But at the end of the day, her campaigning skills are utterly atrocious..Russia or no Russia.. and based purely on that she will not lead the Tories into another election...


    Hi Tyson - I am not desperate for you to look lovingly at TM, just to accept she is playing this well and trouncing Corbyn
  • TheValiantTheValiant Posts: 1,889
    edited March 2018
    JWisemann said:

    I'd suggest that you are wrong Mike, yet again, and that Corbyn's measured and grown-up response will go down better with a fair slice of the country than impotent and childish willy-waving in some sub-pound-shop Thatcher-in-1982 fashion.

    It's really getting very good. The Russians have clearly been programming their bots very well. I'd almost think this was a real person typing this.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    Pat McFadden, sacked by Corbz for criticising his response to the Paris bombings, unsurprisingly not in favour of the dear leader's approach...
  • tysontyson Posts: 6,120

    I'm not sure that kicking out a few flunkeys or refusing to send a few flunkeys to Britain is really going to affect the price of herrings.

    As for Jeremy Corbyn, why is anyone surprised at his response?

    Corbyn put the blame on last years terrible bombings on our foreign policy, much to the disgust of the commentariat and our bleating pbers....he did that during a GE election campaign too...and look where that got him?
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,213

    tyson said:

    I am reluctant to suggest this but it does seem like this is TM's Falkland's moment

    That’s about the 17th time you’ve called that this year!! :-)

    Today’s events have far more significance for Labour than for Mrs May. The measures announced are not going to cause much of a problem for Putin and do nothing to discomfit the oligarchs that surround him. The UK is in a weak position, unfortunately.


    Poor Big G is desperate for us all to look lovingly at our dear leader through his coloured glasses...

    Granted she is playing the politics of all this quite well, but seriously that is all she is doing. We need to go much further of course, but May's natural caution will stop it. There is no way we should be participating in the World Cup in a country sponsoring terrorism, murder led by criminals and thieves.

    But at the end of the day, her campaigning skills are utterly atrocious..Russia or no Russia.. and based purely on that she will not lead the Tories into another election...


    Hi Tyson - I am not desperate for you to look lovingly at TM, just to accept she is playing this well and trouncing Corbyn
    She is not trouncing Corbyn, he is trouncing himself to the embarrassment of the majority of his party's MPs.
  • TheWhiteRabbitTheWhiteRabbit Posts: 12,454
    tyson said:

    I'm not sure that kicking out a few flunkeys or refusing to send a few flunkeys to Britain is really going to affect the price of herrings.

    As for Jeremy Corbyn, why is anyone surprised at his response?

    Corbyn put the blame on last years terrible bombings on our foreign policy, much to the disgust of the commentariat and our bleating pbers....he did that during a GE election campaign too...and look where that got him?
    The opposition benches??
  • BudGBudG Posts: 711


    As for Jeremy Corbyn, why is anyone surprised at his response?

    Quite. He has form on matters like this.

    I recall he was unsupportive of a former Prime Minister who assured the nation that it was right to declare war on Iraq because it was HIGHLY LIKELY that Saddam had weapons of mass destruction. Not at all surprised he is raising questions about evidence.

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 53,254

    JWisemann said:

    I'd suggest that you are wrong Mike, yet again, and that Corbyn's measured and grown-up response will go down better with a fair slice of the country than impotent and childish willy-waving in some sub-pound-shop Thatcher-in-1982 fashion.

    It's really getting very good. The Russian's have clearly been programming their bots very well. I'd almost think this was a real person typing this.
    Until you actually read what they say. Then you just have to bust out laughing.....
This discussion has been closed.