The way Theresa May is answering her questions, it appears the government does have legal advice that it is possible for the Government to revoke Article 50
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
Yup, she should have ripped it up and said I'm going nowhere
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
Wasn't that a reaction to the intruder/heckler? If so, and as a reaction to an unscripted event, it was quite good.
Dura - I think perhaps BAE could get the RN to record an Astute attack run against a Hobart destroyer or its Spanish equivalent. It would show the disadvantage of conducting ASW with a noisy design from Navantia, and make clear the benefits of the Type 26 to the Australians and the Canadians.
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
Wasn't that a reaction to the intruder/heckler? If so, and as a reaction to an unscripted event, it was quite good.
I thought it sounded as though she wanted to replace him as leader of the opposition - which probably wasn't the intended effect.
So the prime minister would be ill advised to draw much comfort from the decision of most senior Tories to rally round her this weekend and – at least publicly – to distance themselves from Grant Shapps, outed last week as a ringleader of the plot to depose her. Their support is entirely provisional, and in many cases spectacularly hypocritical.
Indeed, the rubbishing of Shapps in the past few days has been pathetic. Though his chairmanship of the party between 2012 and 2015 was not without controversy, he is an able politician who knows the Tory movement inside out. The leaden-footed campaign to present him as a marginal figure is ridiculous. Like Ed Vaizey – the MP for Wantage, who has also raised doubts about May’s leadership – Shapps is treating the voters like adults by saying explicitly what everyone knows his colleagues are muttering in private.
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
Wasn't that a reaction to the intruder/heckler? If so, and as a reaction to an unscripted event, it was quite good.
It was illogical as presumably she wants him to keep his current job!
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
Wasn't that a reaction to the intruder/heckler? If so, and as a reaction to an unscripted event, it was quite good.
Yeah, but 'I wish the leader of the opposition was fired!' implies she'd rather be facing somebody else or something. I think the kids call it a 'self-own'.
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
It wasn't the wittiest riposte in the history of politics, but it was pretty good response in the circumstances. I bet you couldn't manage anything one hundredth as good if you were suddenly presented, during a set-piece speech, by someone completely unexpected, who might have had violent intentions, and where you didn't know what the hell was going in. She probably couldn't even see what was happening very well, given that the lights would have been shining at her.
No wonder it got a roar of approval - she deserved it on that.
Presumably it means Labour are doing very badly in either Tory or Labour safe seats if they are doing relatively well in their marginals?
I'm assuming the Tories are stacking up votes where they don't need to, a bit like Labour in 2015.
Nah - suspect most people like that voted Tory anyway (also high turnout seats) More likely that Labour DNV reverting to type in their safe seats. Same outcome though.
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
Wasn't that a reaction to the intruder/heckler? If so, and as a reaction to an unscripted event, it was quite good.
I thought it sounded as though she wanted to replace him as leader of the opposition - which probably wasn't the intended effect.
So the prime minister would be ill advised to draw much comfort from the decision of most senior Tories to rally round her this weekend and – at least publicly – to distance themselves from Grant Shapps, outed last week as a ringleader of the plot to depose her. Their support is entirely provisional, and in many cases spectacularly hypocritical.
Indeed, the rubbishing of Shapps in the past few days has been pathetic. Though his chairmanship of the party between 2012 and 2015 was not without controversy, he is an able politician who knows the Tory movement inside out. The leaden-footed campaign to present him as a marginal figure is ridiculous. Like Ed Vaizey – the MP for Wantage, who has also raised doubts about May’s leadership – Shapps is treating the voters like adults by saying explicitly what everyone knows his colleagues are muttering in private.
Presumably it means Labour are doing very badly in either Tory or Labour safe seats if they are doing relatively well in their marginals?
I'm assuming the Tories are stacking up votes where they don't need to, a bit like Labour in 2015.
Nah - suspect most people like that voted Tory anyway (also high turnout seats) More likely that Labour DNV reverting to type in their safe seats. Same outcome though.
The last GE was a free hit. Six or nothing but you've got to be a bit stupid to get out. Whatever, it rarely decides the game outcome.
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
It wasn't the wittiest riposte in the history of politics, but it was pretty good response in the circumstances. I bet you couldn't manage anything one hundredth as good if you were suddenly presented, during a set-piece speech, by someone completely unexpected, who might have had violent intentions, and where you didn't know what the hell was going in. She probably couldn't even see what was happening very well, given that the lights would have been shining at her.
No wonder it got a roar of approval - she deserved it on that.
It was a playground 'no, you!' response that made no sense. 'I want to give your mum a P45!'
But it is interesting that Corbyn was so present at the Tory conference that he was the first thing she blurted out with the second she went off script. A spectre is haunting the Tory Party...
It's an extremely good example of the kind of concession to the EU - in practice trivial, but symbolic - which she could have made without political risk in return for concessions on their side, if only the electorate had given her the mandate she asked for. Now, who knows? The dangers of political chaos loom large.
It's an extremely good example of the kind of concession to the EU - in practice trivial, but symbolic - which she could have made without political risk in return for concessions on their side, if only the electorate had given her the mandate she asked for. Now, who knows? The dangers of political chaos loom large.
I think the perception is more important than the reality - not unusual where sentiment is involved
It's an extremely good example of the kind of concession to the EU - in practice trivial, but symbolic - which she could have made without political risk in return for concessions on their side, if only the electorate had given her the mandate she asked for. Now, who knows? The dangers of political chaos loom large.
It's an extremely good example of the kind of concession to the EU - in practice trivial, but symbolic - which she could have made without political risk in return for concessions on their side, if only the electorate had given her the mandate she asked for. Now, who knows? The dangers of political chaos loom large.
Yeah, not sure why there's a huge fuss over an additional couple of years during the transition period. Worried about backsliding, perhaps?
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
Revolutions without revolutionaries are doomed to failure.
Some of them really are bonkers. What the hell does it matter whether ECJ rules apply for another couple of years, when there's about a zillion really major issues to be addressed?
It's an extremely good example of the kind of concession to the EU - in practice trivial, but symbolic - which she could have made without political risk in return for concessions on their side, if only the electorate had given her the mandate she asked for. Now, who knows? The dangers of political chaos loom large.
Yeah, not sure why there's a huge fuss over an additional couple of years during the transition period. Worried about backsliding, perhaps?
They want it all sorted before events occur and we end up with a Labour government.
Some of them really are bonkers. What the hell does it matter whether ECJ rules apply for another couple of years, when there's about a zillion really major issues to be addressed?
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
The country has manoeuvred itself, with the help of the Brexiteers, into a strategic cul-de-sac with only one way out to repair the damage: embrace the EU fully and join the Euro. Otherwise we are simply opting to take early retirement as a nation.
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
This was always Brexit's destination. We "Remoaners" have said so repeatedly and been lambasted for doing so.
Some of them really are bonkers. What the hell does it matter whether ECJ rules apply for another couple of years, when there's about a zillion really major issues to be addressed?
Some Leavers really do need muzzling at full moons.
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
The country has manoeuvred itself, with the help of the Brexiteers, into a strategic cul-de-sac with only one way out to repair the damage: embrace the EU fully and join the Euro. Otherwise we are simply opting to take early retirement as a nation.
Buy a tank and go through the closed end. There is always another way.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
The country has manoeuvred itself, with the help of the Brexiteers, into a strategic cul-de-sac with only one way out to repair the damage: embrace the EU fully and join the Euro. Otherwise we are simply opting to take early retirement as a nation.
Buy a tank and go through the closed end. There is always another way.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
- Hard as nails Brexit would be a catastrophic failure - Soft and fluffy Brexit would turn us into the Puerto Rico of Europe
There is no alternative now to accepting that our destiny is as at the heart of the political project. The sooner we accept it and plan for it, the better.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
I would not have voted for that back then, but subsequent events have convinced me that UK politicians are not fit for purpose and need to be scrapped, so I would vote for it now.
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
The country has manoeuvred itself, with the help of the Brexiteers, into a strategic cul-de-sac with only one way out to repair the damage: embrace the EU fully and join the Euro. Otherwise we are simply opting to take early retirement as a nation.
Buy a tank and go through the closed end. There is always another way.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
- Hard as nails Brexit would be a catastrophic failure - Soft and fluffy Brexit would turn us into the Puerto Rico of Europe
There is no alternative now to accepting that our destiny is as at the heart of the political project. The sooner we accept it and plan for it, the better.
We already tried that under Blair. I admired him for his efforts but it didn't work out. Sometimes the right approach is the messy muddle through, as much as ideologues on both sides may hate it. For all the noise and bluster that seems to be where we're going, although the sausage making process is never pretty.
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
The country has manoeuvred itself, with the help of the Brexiteers, into a strategic cul-de-sac with only one way out to repair the damage: embrace the EU fully and join the Euro. Otherwise we are simply opting to take early retirement as a nation.
Buy a tank and go through the closed end. There is always another way.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
- Hard as nails Brexit would be a catastrophic failure - Soft and fluffy Brexit would turn us into the Puerto Rico of Europe
There is no alternative now to accepting that our destiny is as at the heart of the political project. The sooner we accept it and plan for it, the better.
They want it all sorted before events occur and we end up with a Labour government.
If so, they've got it completely wrong - faffing about over the ECJ will only delay getting it sorted.
If they for example bring down Theresa over it they risk bringing about precisely the election they fear.
That is how bonkers they are.
The most wondrous feature of their bonkersness is that, against the odds, they actually won the principal argument. Sabotaging your own success takes a very special breed of head-banger.
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
The country has manoeuvred itself, with the help of the Brexiteers, into a strategic cul-de-sac with only one way out to repair the damage: embrace the EU fully and join the Euro. Otherwise we are simply opting to take early retirement as a nation.
Buy a tank and go through the closed end. There is always another way.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
- Hard as nails Brexit would be a catastrophic failure - Soft and fluffy Brexit would turn us into the Puerto Rico of Europe
There is no alternative now to accepting that our destiny is as at the heart of the political project. The sooner we accept it and plan for it, the better.
We already tried that under Blair. I admired him for his efforts but it didn't work out. Sometimes the right approach is the messy muddle through, as much as ideologues on both sides may hate it. For all the noise and bluster that seems to be where we're going, although the sausage making process is never pretty.
We didn’t try it. Blair spent his political capital on the Iraq war instead of joining the Euro.
The most wondrous feature of their bonkersness is that, against the odds, they actually won the principal argument. Sabotaging your own success takes a very special breed of head-banger.
They won the vote.
They are terrified that they did not in fact win the argument, and can't afford to have it again.
This is turning into an utter disaster. We will end up accepting the EU's ultimatum, and pay an absolute fortune in exchange for no influence. The transition will give business time to form an orderly queue to leave the UK, whilst our politicians will accept our colonial status on a permanent basis to avoid a cliff-edge in 2021.
The country has manoeuvred itself, with the help of the Brexiteers, into a strategic cul-de-sac with only one way out to repair the damage: embrace the EU fully and join the Euro. Otherwise we are simply opting to take early retirement as a nation.
Buy a tank and go through the closed end. There is always another way.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
- Hard as nails Brexit would be a catastrophic failure - Soft and fluffy Brexit would turn us into the Puerto Rico of Europe
There is no alternative now to accepting that our destiny is as at the heart of the political project. The sooner we accept it and plan for it, the better.
We already tried that under Blair. I admired him for his efforts but it didn't work out. Sometimes the right approach is the messy muddle through, as much as ideologues on both sides may hate it. For all the noise and bluster that seems to be where we're going, although the sausage making process is never pretty.
We didn’t try it. Blair spent his political capital on the Iraq war instead of joining the Euro.
If we'd have joined the Euro, we would have been in a bad state right now and the British public would never have accepted it anyway. The question was whether we could have major influence outside the Euro. The Blair and Cameron years showed the answer was no.
Some of them really are bonkers. What the hell does it matter whether ECJ rules apply for another couple of years, when there's about a zillion really major issues to be addressed?
They are, I'm afraid, plastic patriots with absolutely no interest in what is best for the UK and its people. They want to argue about abstracts and destiny and Agincourt. It's utterly, irredeemably pathetic. If I were a Tory I would want them out of my party forthwith. As it is, I just hold them in total contempt. They will never, ever be satisfied.
Royal Mail is the "quick win" for an incoming Labour government,could be done in the first week,the others will take time.A s Mrs Thatcher rightly said the privatisation of Royal Mail was "a step too far".
Some of them really are bonkers. What the hell does it matter whether ECJ rules apply for another couple of years, when there's about a zillion really major issues to be addressed?
They are, I'm afraid, plastic patriots with absolutely no interest in what is best for the UK and its people. They want to argue about abstracts and destiny and Agincourt. It's utterly, irredeemably pathetic. If I were a Tory I would want them out of my party forthwith. As it is, I just hold them in total contempt. They will never, ever be satisfied.
What an utterly horrible post. How is name calling helpful? You're better than this.
I think you and Casino should take a break from PB today.
A University of Oxford college banned Christian Union representatives from attending its freshers’ fair over concerns at the “potential for harm to freshers”.
Balliol Christian Union (CU) was told the college’s student body, the JCR, wanted the freshers’ fair to be a “secular space”, according to Oxford’s student newspaper Cherwell.
Eventually the CU was told that a single multi-faith stall would be allowed to display leaflets, though no representatives would be allowed to staff it, according to leaked emails seen by the paper. Balliol CU boycotted this option.
Some of them really are bonkers. What the hell does it matter whether ECJ rules apply for another couple of years, when there's about a zillion really major issues to be addressed?
Looking for sanity from an ideological Brexiteer is ambitious
@estwebber: Corbyn says half the Conservatives want Johnson sacked and half want Hammond sacked
Labour MP: "We want them both sacked!"
Reminds me, did anyone else think Theresa May's 'there's somebody I'd like to give a P45 to and that's Jeremy Corbyn!' comeback was the worst thing about the whole conference palaver? It didn't make any sense and got a roar from the audience.
It wasn't the wittiest riposte in the history of politics, but it was pretty good response in the circumstances. I bet you couldn't manage anything one hundredth as good if you were suddenly presented, during a set-piece speech, by someone completely unexpected, who might have had violent intentions, and where you didn't know what the hell was going in. She probably couldn't even see what was happening very well, given that the lights would have been shining at her.
No wonder it got a roar of approval - she deserved it on that.
It was a playground 'no, you!' response that made no sense. 'I want to give your mum a P45!'
But it is interesting that Corbyn was so present at the Tory conference that he was the first thing she blurted out with the second she went off script. A spectre is haunting the Tory Party...
I think that her "No, Jeremy Corbyn" response was actually a return to script.
She was talking of Jezza just before the P45, and I think "No, Jeremy Corbyn" was a scripted attempt at humour mocking "Oh, Jeremy Corbyn"
It fell flat because of the incident, but also because it doesn't work as a joke.
They want it all sorted before events occur and we end up with a Labour government.
If so, they've got it completely wrong - faffing about over the ECJ will only delay getting it sorted.
If they for example bring down Theresa over it they risk bringing about precisely the election they fear.
That is how bonkers they are.
The most wondrous feature of their bonkersness is that, against the odds, they actually won the principal argument. Sabotaging your own success takes a very special breed of head-banger.
We won a single battle, then handed over command to a general from the other side who has no victories to her name.
Not having a Brexiteer as PM May prove fatal (boom boom) to Brexit.
Royal Mail is the "quick win" for an incoming Labour government,could be done in the first week,the others will take time.A s Mrs Thatcher rightly said the privatisation of Royal Mail was "a step too far".
Yes, but it was far more relevant then. It is now left delivering advertorial junk mail.
TSE on the ICM poll: "Given the contrast between the remarkable unity and optimism at the Labour conference, and the division and mayhem at the Conservative one, these figures are surprising. But they are probably a useful reminder that most people pay little or no attention to what goes on at party conferences, and that most of what preoccupies political obsessives has minimal impact on voting intention."
Or... they are a useful reminder that most of the Westminster village comments echoed on thread headers et al on here and elsewhere have no clue as to the thoughts and views of typical voters.
I was pointing out Theresa May would be a disaster when the village thought she was Thatcher incarnate.
Just saying.
42% of voters clearly think you are wrong.
I forget losing Cameron's majority constitutes a success for Mrs May.
I'm sorry you don't like the polling but we are where we are.
Just to be clear, you consider the general election result a success for the Tory party?
Nope - but more people appear to support the May led Tory government than have voted Tory in recent times. Sadly you typify the hyperbolic nature of political commentary or what passes for it these days. Thankfully, the voters have got a much clearer sense of perspective. Brexit has divided the country down the middle - the polling reflects this but the commentary generally does not.
And Theresa May is so bad, that an IRA condoning Trot has see Labour receive support not seen since Blair at his pomp.
Theresa May's 42% is the best Tory GE vote %-age since 1987.
Comments
Presumably it means Labour are doing very badly in either Tory or Labour safe seats if they are doing relatively well in their marginals?
So the prime minister would be ill advised to draw much comfort from the decision of most senior Tories to rally round her this weekend and – at least publicly – to distance themselves from Grant Shapps, outed last week as a ringleader of the plot to depose her. Their support is entirely provisional, and in many cases spectacularly hypocritical.
Indeed, the rubbishing of Shapps in the past few days has been pathetic. Though his chairmanship of the party between 2012 and 2015 was not without controversy, he is an able politician who knows the Tory movement inside out. The leaden-footed campaign to present him as a marginal figure is ridiculous. Like Ed Vaizey – the MP for Wantage, who has also raised doubts about May’s leadership – Shapps is treating the voters like adults by saying explicitly what everyone knows his colleagues are muttering in private.
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2017/oct/08/theresa-may-tory-party-ruth-davidson
Tory delight at being level with Comrade Corbyn
Short lived
No wonder it got a roar of approval - she deserved it on that.
She is a complete dud.
[well someone had to say it]
He had the same rumours as me, and they turned out to be true.
But it is interesting that Corbyn was so present at the Tory conference that he was the first thing she blurted out with the second she went off script. A spectre is haunting the Tory Party...
https://twitter.com/faisalislam/status/917428822076809217
https://twitter.com/tomboadle/status/917428857141161984
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/650459/customs_bill_white_paper_web.pdf
Revolutions without revolutionaries are doomed to failure.
There is always another way.
If full integration with the rest of the euro zone had been on the ballot paper I would probably have voted for it.
- Soft and fluffy Brexit would turn us into the Puerto Rico of Europe
There is no alternative now to accepting that our destiny is as at the heart of the political project. The sooner we accept it and plan for it, the better.
Well, your wish might be granted, especially if the Conservative Party doesn't unite behind Theresa May.
That is how bonkers they are.
Assumption
Limited thinking
They are terrified that they did not in fact win the argument, and can't afford to have it again.
I think you and Casino should take a break from PB today.
Balliol Christian Union (CU) was told the college’s student body, the JCR, wanted the freshers’ fair to be a “secular space”, according to Oxford’s student newspaper Cherwell.
Eventually the CU was told that a single multi-faith stall would be allowed to display leaflets, though no representatives would be allowed to staff it, according to leaked emails seen by the paper. Balliol CU boycotted this option.
https://www.theguardian.com/education/2017/oct/09/anger-as-oxford-college-bans-christian-group-from-freshers-fair?CMP=Share_iOSApp_Other
She was talking of Jezza just before the P45, and I think "No, Jeremy Corbyn" was a scripted attempt at humour mocking "Oh, Jeremy Corbyn"
It fell flat because of the incident, but also because it doesn't work as a joke.
https://twitter.com/bbclaurak/status/917443240105791488
Tezza has the full support of BoZo and Gove.
So that's all good...
Not having a Brexiteer as PM May prove fatal (boom boom) to Brexit.