Indeed. The actions of this dastard have only strengthened the system he was attacking.
I hate to sound picky, but one 52 year old man with one vehicle and one knife vs Democracy with a capital D was only going to have one conclusion, surely? The overblown rhetoric suggests that if we were just fractionally less resolute and stiff in the upper lip we'd have fedexed the keys to no. 10 to al Baghdadi by now, and asked him to address both houses of parliament before imposing sharia law.
Without diminishing the tragedies for the families affected by yesterday's events I'm glad that there won't be a Thursday by-election thread caused by the attack. I suspect that if one or more had been caused then the Jo Cox precedent would probably have been followed but I'm very glad that was not necessary.
Barnier has acknowledged that sorting out citizens’ rights will be top priority while the divorce bill is described thus:
“There is no price to pay to leave. But we must settle the accounts. We will not ask the British to pay a single euro for something they have not agreed to as a member.”
Deutsche Bank look set to take a 25 year lease on a new London HQ while the Dutch are pushing for us to have a combination of Canada+ as a goods deal and a beefed up version of equivalence.
Huh. I was in the City today for work and saw a Polling Station sign near one of the Lloyd's buildings. I had wondered if tonight's local by-election thread might explain its presence, but alas.
Huh. I was in the City today for work and saw a Polling Station sign near one of the Lloyd's buildings. I had wondered if tonight's local by-election thread might explain its presence, but alas.
Elections today for the City of London's Court of Common Council
Without diminishing the tragedies for the families affected by yesterday's events I'm glad that there won't be a Thursday by-election thread caused by the attack. I suspect that if one or more had been caused then the Jo Cox precedent would probably have been followed but I'm very glad that was not necessary.
I'm not sure how to respond to that because it does in fact raise a serious point. The Jo Cox precedent should be no such thing. Elections should be contested no matter how distressing the circumstances that caused them. That was the case in the 80s ad 90s (Anthony Berry, Ian Gow) and it still should be. But the only way to test a precedent like that doesn't bear thinking about. So what to do? I think it needs at least two of the major political parties to say,BEFORE it needs saying, that they will contest a seat made vacant by the murder of an MP, no matter what.
So US immigration officials can operate in Irish airports but British ones can't?
Policing exit from Ireland, not entry.
Same as British Home Office officers operating in Calais at the moment.
They are also policing exit from France, not entry.
The loony Brexit proposal was to place Ireland within the UK border.
I don't think that's what was meant at all, but what you're saying is then that there's no reason there couldn't be UK immigration officials operating in Irish airports pre-clearing those who're heading to the UK?
So US immigration officials can operate in Irish airports but British ones can't?
Policing exit from Ireland, not entry.
Same as British Home Office officers operating in Calais at the moment.
They are also policing exit from France, not entry.
The loony Brexit proposal was to place Ireland within the UK border.
I don't think that's what was meant at all, but what you're saying is then that there's no reason there couldn't be UK immigration officials operating in Irish airports pre-clearing those who're heading to the UK?
There's no reason they couldn't pre-clear people heading for the UK, but that is not what was proposed. What was proposed was pre-clearing people entering Ireland, so that an open border could operate between the north and the south.
Huh. I was in the City today for work and saw a Polling Station sign near one of the Lloyd's buildings. I had wondered if tonight's local by-election thread might explain its presence, but alas.
Elections today for the City of London's Court of Common Council
So US immigration officials can operate in Irish airports but British ones can't?
Policing exit from Ireland, not entry.
Same as British Home Office officers operating in Calais at the moment.
They are also policing exit from France, not entry.
The loony Brexit proposal was to place Ireland within the UK border.
Net migration to Northern Ireland was less than 2,500 per year between 2000 and 2014, and the reduced right to settle, claim benefits, take up work etc will most likely take that number down, very possibly causing migration displacement to the Irish Republic.
The Irish border as a migration access point is fairly irrelevant.
The bigger issue with the border will be the flow of goods if we go to tariffs.
A Scotland Yard spokesman said research into other names the attacker used was ongoing, adding: “Khalid Masood is not at this early stage believed to be his birth name.”
Indeed. The actions of this dastard have only strengthened the system he was attacking.
I hate to sound picky, but one 52 year old man with one vehicle and one knife vs Democracy with a capital D was only going to have one conclusion, surely? The overblown rhetoric suggests that if we were just fractionally less resolute and stiff in the upper lip we'd have fedexed the keys to no. 10 to al Baghdadi by now, and asked him to address both houses of parliament before imposing sharia law.
Well not quite, but it did remind a rather anti-establishment mindset what it is that they criticise!
A Scotland Yard spokesman said research into other names the attacker used was ongoing, adding: “Khalid Masood is not at this early stage believed to be his birth name.”
Martin Brunt On Sky a couple of hours ago said that he knew that he had an English sounding name, and was a convert to Islam.
A Scotland Yard spokesman said research into other names the attacker used was ongoing, adding: “Khalid Masood is not at this early stage believed to be his birth name.”
Martin Brunt On Sky a couple of hours ago said that he knew that he had an English sounding name, and was a convert to Islam.
Perhaps he really was locally known as dave in his early years.
So US immigration officials can operate in Irish airports but British ones can't?
Policing exit from Ireland, not entry.
Same as British Home Office officers operating in Calais at the moment.
They are also policing exit from France, not entry.
The loony Brexit proposal was to place Ireland within the UK border.
I don't think that's what was meant at all, but what you're saying is then that there's no reason there couldn't be UK immigration officials operating in Irish airports pre-clearing those who're heading to the UK?
There's no reason they couldn't pre-clear people heading for the UK, but that is not what was proposed. What was proposed was pre-clearing people entering Ireland, so that an open border could operate between the north and the south.
Surely that would entail Irish migration officers in British airports allowing them to pre-clear people entering Ireland. Just as there are French officers in Dover?
A Scotland Yard spokesman said research into other names the attacker used was ongoing, adding: “Khalid Masood is not at this early stage believed to be his birth name.”
Martin Brunt On Sky a couple of hours ago said that he knew that he had an English sounding name, and was a convert to Islam.
Perhaps he really was locally known as dave in his early years.
A Scotland Yard spokesman said research into other names the attacker used was ongoing, adding: “Khalid Masood is not at this early stage believed to be his birth name.”
Without diminishing the tragedies for the families affected by yesterday's events I'm glad that there won't be a Thursday by-election thread caused by the attack. I suspect that if one or more had been caused then the Jo Cox precedent would probably have been followed but I'm very glad that was not necessary.
I'm not sure how to respond to that because it does in fact raise a serious point. The Jo Cox precedent should be no such thing. Elections should be contested no matter how distressing the circumstances that caused them. That was the case in the 80s ad 90s (Anthony Berry, Ian Gow) and it still should be. But the only way to test a precedent like that doesn't bear thinking about. So what to do? I think it needs at least two of the major political parties to say,BEFORE it needs saying, that they will contest a seat made vacant by the murder of an MP, no matter what.
The problem with that is that it creates a darkly perverse incentive to murder. Slim majority and an unpopular government? Kill a few marginal MPs and you've taken down the government.
There was a by election in the same Blackburn ward on Dec 15th last , it was an easy Labour hold
Lab 435 UKIP 187 Con
What? Con actually zero? Not our best ground, but still...
ooppss Con 125
That's better, or the candidate would have had to have a word with the ten electors who signed the nomination form! Not that they had to vote for him or her...
Without diminishing the tragedies for the families affected by yesterday's events I'm glad that there won't be a Thursday by-election thread caused by the attack. I suspect that if one or more had been caused then the Jo Cox precedent would probably have been followed but I'm very glad that was not necessary.
I'm not sure how to respond to that because it does in fact raise a serious point. The Jo Cox precedent should be no such thing. Elections should be contested no matter how distressing the circumstances that caused them. That was the case in the 80s ad 90s (Anthony Berry, Ian Gow) and it still should be. But the only way to test a precedent like that doesn't bear thinking about. So what to do? I think it needs at least two of the major political parties to say,BEFORE it needs saying, that they will contest a seat made vacant by the murder of an MP, no matter what.
The problem with that is that it creates a darkly perverse incentive to murder. Slim majority and an unpopular government? Kill a few marginal MPs and you've taken down the government.
You're probably right. Maybe just everyone agreeing in a general way that democracy is above sanctimonious bullshit will have to do.
So US immigration officials can operate in Irish airports but British ones can't?
Policing exit from Ireland, not entry.
You sure? I've not done it but I thought the deal was fly to Dublin/Shannon from the UK and pre clear US immigration and customs at the Irish airport so you land in the US as effectively a domestic passenger. If that's actually how it operates surely that's not so much policing exit from Ireland as entry to the US?
Edit: on second reading I see what you mean.
However seems odd the Irish can concede the principle of US immigration operating but not the UK. Their right of course, and we could've reciprocated by having Irish officers at Heathrow as a CRA border force, but if they don't want that well that's their option.
So US immigration officials can operate in Irish airports but British ones can't?
Policing exit from Ireland, not entry.
You sure? I've not done it but I thought the deal was fly to Dublin/Shannon from the UK and pre clear US immigration and customs at the Irish airport so you land in the US as effectively a domestic passenger. If that's actually how it operates surely that's not so much policing exit from Ireland as entry to the US?
Yes, that's what I meant, albeit clumsily expressed. The point was to contrast it with the Brexit proposal which was to treat people arriving in Ireland as it they were arriving in the UK.
Speaking of railway journeys, I'm actually flying from Bristol to Newcastle tomorrow for the express purpose of avoiding the rail. Not that I dislike train journeys as such - get a table and its the best way to travel - but it is so bloody long to get up north! I don't know how people survive days long journeys on the things.
Speaking of railway journeys, I'm actually flying from Bristol to Newcastle tomorrow for the express purpose of avoiding the rail. Not that I dislike train journeys as such - get a table and its the best way to travel - but it is so bloody long to get up north! I don't know how people survive days long journeys on the things.
Would have preferred to take the train on a trip to Rotterdam this week, but the fare was about £170 return and Sleazyjet to Amsterdam was about £70 (+€20 for the Dutch train leg).
Perhaps not the best region for him, Le Pen has a bigger first round lead in Provence-Alpes-Cotes d'Azur than any other region of France, she is on 35.5% there, Macron is on 20% and Fillon 19%.
In the runoff Macron scrapes home by 51% to 49% for Le Pen
Perhaps not the best region for him, Le Pen has a bigger first round lead in Provence-Alpes-Cotes d'Azur than any other region of France, she is on 35.5% there, Macron is on 20% and Fillon 19%.
In the runoff Macron scrapes home by 51% to 49% for Le Pen
So US immigration officials can operate in Irish airports but British ones can't?
Policing exit from Ireland, not entry.
Same as British Home Office officers operating in Calais at the moment.
They are also policing exit from France, not entry.
The loony Brexit proposal was to place Ireland within the UK border.
Net migration to Northern Ireland was less than 2,500 per year between 2000 and 2014, and the reduced right to settle, claim benefits, take up work etc will most likely take that number down, very possibly causing migration displacement to the Irish Republic.
The Irish border as a migration access point is fairly irrelevant.
The bigger issue with the border will be the flow of goods if we go to tariffs.
It is worth remembering that - for example - there is no free market in certain agricultural products between Norway and the EU. This does not mean that there are checks on the border, the asssumption is that people will behave honestly. (And, being Norway and Sweden, people by and large do.)
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
For a long time, Provence-Alpes-Cotes d'Azur was where all the elected FN politicians were, and back in the 1990s, they had control of the most of the local government in Avignion. Marion Marechel Le Pen is an MP from the P-A-C region.
Speaking of railway journeys, I'm actually flying from Bristol to Newcastle tomorrow for the express purpose of avoiding the rail. Not that I dislike train journeys as such - get a table and its the best way to travel - but it is so bloody long to get up north! I don't know how people survive days long journeys on the things.
I went to Newcastle Airport via the Metro last week, and saw the Bristol flight on the departure screens. I also happened to see an Airbus A400 military turboprop take-off.
Longest UK train ride (without changing) for me was Leuchars to King's Cross southbound, about 5 years back, all of six hours.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Almost certainly.
The only solution is to be tougher w muslims than is politically possible, and fair to the vast majority, so there will be more and more incidents across Europe. It is a nightmare of our own making with no practical solution
I will make a forecast. The next five years will see fewer (probably far fewer) deaths in Europe from Islamic terrorists than the past five.
Two reasons:
1. Before 2001, we didn't take Islamic terrorism seriously. It's taken a long time to re-orient the security services so they're pointing at Muslim fundamentalists, but now they are. This means that large scale incidents get harder and harder to organise.
2. The Saudis (that'll be our "allies") have funded practically Islamic terrorism. It is they that have spread Wahabbi Islam (as opposed to Sufi and other more moderate sects) by spending money on Mosques and sponsoring schools. The Saudi money is drying up.
Perhaps not the best region for him, Le Pen has a bigger first round lead in Provence-Alpes-Cotes d'Azur than any other region of France, she is on 35.5% there, Macron is on 20% and Fillon 19%.
In the runoff Macron scrapes home by 51% to 49% for Le Pen
I will make a forecast. The next five years will see fewer (probably far fewer) deaths in Europe from Islamic terrorists than the past five.
Two reasons:
1. Before 2001, we didn't take Islamic terrorism seriously. It's taken a long time to re-orient the security services so they're pointing at Muslim fundamentalists, but now they are. This means that large scale incidents get harder and harder to organise.
2. The Saudis (that'll be our "allies") have funded practically Islamic terrorism. It is they that have spread Wahabbi Islam (as opposed to Sufi and other more moderate sects) by spending money on Mosques and sponsoring schools. The Saudi money is drying up.
I remember having a conversation with a good Muslim friend of mine about point #2 nearly 10 years ago...he said it was a huge problem in his home country of Pakistan and should be taken very seriously.
As for writing a book? I fear TSE would brand me a pound shop Portillo
He may, but wouldn't you be more the latter day John Betjeman??
Perhaps! But I do have a huge collection of photos of all the stations I've visited, as well as photos taken during each journey (most blurry, however!). Also took the time to visit Liverpool waterfront (Three Muses), Newcastle's Tyne Bridge, the Blackpool Tram, Southport Pier, The Nationalist Railway Museum (York), Cleethorpes and Scarborough seafronts, and Berwick's Royal Border Bridge. And that's just this year
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Maajid Nawaz thinks that until there is a clash of cultures within Islam itself and the modernizers win there will always be problems.
Almost all the foreign money coming in to subsidise Islam in the UK (and without which most Mosques would close) comes from Saudi Arabia and goes to Wahabbi and Deobandi Mosques. Until that money is cut off, one way or another, there will be problems.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
For a long time, Provence-Alpes-Cotes d'Azur was where all the elected FN politicians were, and back in the 1990s, they had control of the most of the local government in Avignion. Marion Marechel Le Pen is an MP from the P-A-C region.
If you've been to the banlieues of Marseilles (as I have, where I very nearly got knifed to death trying to score heroin (yes yes, I'm a selfish wanker)) then you begin to understand why.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Maajid Nawaz thinks that until there is a clash of cultures within Islam itself and the modernizers win there will always be problems.
Almost all the foreign money coming in to subsidise Islam in the UK (and without which most Mosques would close) comes from Saudi Arabia and goes to Wahabbi and Deobandi Mosques. Until that money is cut off, one way or another, there will be problems.
I remember having a conversation with a good Muslim friend of mine about point #2 nearly 10 years ago...he said it was a huge problem in his home country of Pakistan and should be taken very seriously.
The problem is that those sorts of view are now widespeard in Pakistan, so cutting off Saudi money isn't going to do much as the damage is already done.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Maajid Nawaz thinks that until there is a clash of cultures within Islam itself and the modernizers win there will always be problems.
Almost all the foreign money coming in to subsidise Islam in the UK (and without which most Mosques would close) comes from Saudi Arabia and goes to Wahabbi and Deobandi Mosques. Until that money is cut off, one way or another, there will be problems.
I remember having a conversation with a good Muslim friend of mine about point #2 nearly 10 years ago...he said it was a huge problem in his home country of Pakistan and should be taken very seriously.
The problem is that those sorts of view are now widespeard in Pakistan, so cutting off Saudi money isn't going to do much as the damage is already done.
Sorry I probably didn't make it clear, he was saying 10 years ago that he was worried about the same sort of thing happening here.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Maajid Nawaz thinks that until there is a clash of cultures within Islam itself and the modernizers win there will always be problems.
Almost all the foreign money coming in to subsidise Islam in the UK (and without which most Mosques would close) comes from Saudi Arabia and goes to Wahabbi and Deobandi Mosques. Until that money is cut off, one way or another, there will be problems.
Indeed. And Wahhabism is barely distinguishable from Nazism.
Imagine if, in 1930s Britain, we allowed Hitler to fund special schools for millions of German emigres in the UK, where they were taught quasi-Nazi doctrines.
I mean, we just wouldn't fucking do that. So why allow the mosques?
Stop The Funding.
30 years ago, there were virtually no Wahabbi or Deobandi Mosques in the UK - it was like 2 out of 190. Now they are more than half the number and account for all of our homegrown terrorists.
We need to stop being squeamish about pissing off the Saudis. No Wahabbism (and trust me, there's no one other than the Saudis funding these Mosques), means virtually no radicalised local Muslims.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Almost certainly.
The only solution is to be tougher w muslims than is politically possible, and fair to the vast majority, so there will be more and more incidents across Europe. It is a nightmare of our own making with no practical solution
I read the Caldwell book. It's very good, tho possibly too "optimistic" - given events since
I still haven't finished it! Every few pages I have kind of LSD like feelings where I think 'this can't really be happening' before blinking and realising it is, with a sense of doom!
In my original post I meant to write 'and unfair to the vast majority of muslims' by the way
I will make a forecast. The next five years will see fewer (probably far fewer) deaths in Europe from Islamic terrorists than the past five.
Two reasons:
1. Before 2001, we didn't take Islamic terrorism seriously. It's taken a long time to re-orient the security services so they're pointing at Muslim fundamentalists, but now they are. This means that large scale incidents get harder and harder to organise.
2. The Saudis (that'll be our "allies") have funded practically Islamic terrorism. It is they that have spread Wahabbi Islam (as opposed to Sufi and other more moderate sects) by spending money on Mosques and sponsoring schools. The Saudi money is drying up.
I hope you're right, but the worry now is that radicalism in Western Islam is so entrenched it is self-starting and self-motivating. The seed has been sown.
We need to crush ISIS. Stop any more Saudi bullshit. Then come down VERY hard on halal, FGM, honour killings, imams, the niqab: just make daily life much more uncomfortable for the more fundamentalist of Muslims. The evidence is: with enough pressure, they move, in the end.
Right now we are STILL bending over backwards to make life EASIER for them.
It's not self funding, because people who follow medieval Muslim practices don't make much money*. These Mosques would not exist without the Saudi government.
* The prohibition on interest pretty much guarantees you're not going to make it in business.
I will make a forecast. The next five years will see fewer (probably far fewer) deaths in Europe from Islamic terrorists than the past five.
Two reasons:
1. Before 2001, we didn't take Islamic terrorism seriously. It's taken a long time to re-orient the security services so they're pointing at Muslim fundamentalists, but now they are. This means that large scale incidents get harder and harder to organise.
2. The Saudis (that'll be our "allies") have funded practically Islamic terrorism. It is they that have spread Wahabbi Islam (as opposed to Sufi and other more moderate sects) by spending money on Mosques and sponsoring schools. The Saudi money is drying up.
I hope you're right, but the worry now is that radicalism in Western Islam is so entrenched it is self-starting and self-motivating. The seed has been sown.
We need to crush ISIS. Stop any more Saudi bullshit. Then come down VERY hard on halal, FGM, honour killings, imams, the niqab: just make daily life much more uncomfortable for the more fundamentalist of Muslims. The evidence is: with enough pressure, they move, in the end.
Right now we are STILL bending over backwards to make life EASIER for them.
FGM is GBH/ABH and any child who has it, the parents are clearly accessories.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Maajid Nawaz thinks that until there is a clash of cultures within Islam itself and the modernizers win there will always be problems.
Almost all the foreign money coming in to subsidise Islam in the UK (and without which most Mosques would close) comes from Saudi Arabia and goes to Wahabbi and Deobandi Mosques. Until that money is cut off, one way or another, there will be problems.
Indeed. And Wahhabism is barely distinguishable from Nazism.
Imagine if, in 1930s Britain, we allowed Hitler to fund special schools for millions of German emigres in the UK, where they were taught quasi-Nazi doctrines.
I mean, we just wouldn't fucking do that. So why allow the mosques?
I will make a forecast. The next five years will see fewer (probably far fewer) deaths in Europe from Islamic terrorists than the past five.
Two reasons:
1. Before 2001, we didn't take Islamic terrorism seriously. It's taken a long time to re-orient the security services so they're pointing at Muslim fundamentalists, but now they are. This means that large scale incidents get harder and harder to organise.
2. The Saudis (that'll be our "allies") have funded practically Islamic terrorism. It is they that have spread Wahabbi Islam (as opposed to Sufi and other more moderate sects) by spending money on Mosques and sponsoring schools. The Saudi money is drying up.
I hope you're right, but the worry now is that radicalism in Western Islam is so entrenched it is self-starting and self-motivating. The seed has been sown.
We need to crush ISIS. Stop any more Saudi bullshit. Then come down VERY hard on halal, FGM, honour killings, imams, the niqab: just make daily life much more uncomfortable for the more fundamentalist of Muslims. The evidence is: with enough pressure, they move, in the end.
Right now we are STILL bending over backwards to make life EASIER for them.
FGM is GBH/ABH and any child who has it, the parents are clearly accessories.
Careful Surbiton will be out again claiming nothing to do with Islam...doesn't happen outside a tiny number of countries....and a tiny number of hardcore Jewish nutters also do it so its a score draw on that front...
I will make a forecast. The next five years will see fewer (probably far fewer) deaths in Europe from Islamic terrorists than the past five.
Two reasons:
1. Before 2001, we didn't take Islamic terrorism seriously. It's taken a long time to re-orient the security services so they're pointing at Muslim fundamentalists, but now they are. This means that large scale incidents get harder and harder to organise.
2. The Saudis (that'll be our "allies") have funded practically Islamic terrorism. It is they that have spread Wahabbi Islam (as opposed to Sufi and other more moderate sects) by spending money on Mosques and sponsoring schools. The Saudi money is drying up.
I hope you're right, but the worry now is that radicalism in Western Islam is so entrenched it is self-starting and self-motivating. The seed has been sown.
We need to crush ISIS. Stop any more Saudi bullshit. Then come down VERY hard on halal, FGM, honour killings, imams, the niqab: just make daily life much more uncomfortable for the more fundamentalist of Muslims. The evidence is: with enough pressure, they move, in the end.
Right now we are STILL bending over backwards to make life EASIER for them.
FGM is GBH/ABH and any child who has it, the parents are clearly accessories.
Careful Surbiton will be out again claiming nothing to do with Islam...doesn't happen outside a tiny number of countries....and a tiny number of hardcore Jewish nutters also do it so its a score draw on that front...
FGM is not confined solely to Muslims (Ethopian Christians do it do), but I would guess the vast majority of adherents in the UK are Muslims.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Maajid Nawaz thinks that until there is a clash of cultures within Islam itself and the modernizers win there will always be problems.
Almost all the foreign money coming in to subsidise Islam in the UK (and without which most Mosques would close) comes from Saudi Arabia and goes to Wahabbi and Deobandi Mosques. Until that money is cut off, one way or another, there will be problems.
Indeed. And Wahhabism is barely distinguishable from Nazism.
Imagine if, in 1930s Britain, we allowed Hitler to fund special schools for millions of German emigres in the UK, where they were taught quasi-Nazi doctrines.
I mean, we just wouldn't fucking do that. So why allow the mosques?
Stop The Funding.
30 years ago, there were virtually no Wahabbi or Deobandi Mosques in the UK - it was like 2 out of 190. Now they are more than half the number and account for all of our homegrown terrorists.
We need to stop being squeamish about pissing off the Saudis. No Wahabbism (and trust me, there's no one other than the Saudis funding these Mosques), means virtually no radicalised local Muslims.
The south of France is pretty much the most rightwing part of the country. I imagine the Nice attack has only reinforced this.
We are probably headed to a huge clash of cultures: versus internal Islam. It's going to be hideous, and violent.
Maajid Nawaz thinks that until there is a clash of cultures within Islam itself and the modernizers win there will always be problems.
Almost all the foreign money coming in to subsidise Islam in the UK (and without which most Mosques would close) comes from Saudi Arabia and goes to Wahabbi and Deobandi Mosques. Until that money is cut off, one way or another, there will be problems.
Indeed. And Wahhabism is barely distinguishable from Nazism.
Imagine if, in 1930s Britain, we allowed Hitler to fund special schools for millions of German emigres in the UK, where they were taught quasi-Nazi doctrines.
I mean, we just wouldn't fucking do that. So why allow the mosques?
Stop The Funding.
30 years ago, there were virtually no Wahabbi or Deobandi Mosques in the UK - it was like 2 out of 190. Now they are more than half the number and account for all of our homegrown terrorists.
We need to stop being squeamish about pissing off the Saudis. No Wahabbism (and trust me, there's no one other than the Saudis funding these Mosques), means virtually no radicalised local Muslims.
Why do the Saudis fund the Mosques here and elsewhere? Seems a bizarre use of their money.
London terror attacker Khalid Masood, 52, once stabbed a man in the FACE and changed from Kent schoolboy Adrian Elms to maniac who launched car and knife rampage through Westminster.
Again, how the f##k did this guy ever get clearance to be an English teacher.
Comments
Yesterday, Westminster was attacked. If the aim was to stop democracy, then it clearly failed.
Hear hear!
https://twitter.com/CloughOlive/status/844976333297987585
Barnier has acknowledged that sorting out citizens’ rights will be top priority while the divorce bill is described thus:
“There is no price to pay to leave. But we must settle the accounts. We will not ask the British to pay a single euro for something they have not agreed to as a member.”
Deutsche Bank look set to take a 25 year lease on a new London HQ while the Dutch are pushing for us to have a combination of Canada+ as a goods deal and a beefed up version of equivalence.
It’s falling into place.
Born here?!
Martin McGuinness was "not a terrorist" but a "freedom fighter", Sinn Féin leader Gerry Adams has claimed.
* And whatever they are now called.
The loony Brexit proposal was to place Ireland within the UK border.
https://youtu.be/w1cKfqhTIYM
The Irish border as a migration access point is fairly irrelevant.
The bigger issue with the border will be the flow of goods if we go to tariffs.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-39364885
With the internet, do we actually need retail banks at all?
Why can't the BOE/government offer a simple deposit account service for us plebs?
Lab 435
UKIP 187
Con
Presumably the same thing.
Macron
Brittany
Paris and Ile de France
Nouvelle-Aquitaine
Pays de la Loire
Le Pen
Auvergne-Rhone-Alps
Bourgogne-Franche-Comte
Grand Est
Hauts-de-France
Normandy
Occitanie
Provence-Alpes-Cotes d'Azur
Tied
Centre-Val de Loire
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Opinion_polling_for_the_French_presidential_election,_2017
Edit: on second reading I see what you mean.
However seems odd the Irish can concede the principle of US immigration operating but not the UK. Their right of course, and we could've reciprocated by having Irish officers at Heathrow as a CRA border force, but if they don't want that well that's their option.
https://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/oct/09/britain-to-push-post-brexit-uk-immigration-controls-back-to-irish-border
https://twitter.com/RepMcGovern/status/844991898850877443
http://politicalbetting.vanillaforums.com/discussion/comment/1475739/#Comment_1475739
As for writing a book? I fear TSE would brand me a pound shop Portillo
In the runoff Macron scrapes home by 51% to 49% for Le Pen
http://www.ipsos.fr/sites/default/files/public-affairs/Enquete-CEVIPOF/Enquete-CEVIPOF-Mars2017/rapport-ipsos-cevipof-paca-mars-2017.pdf
Longest UK train ride (without changing) for me was Leuchars to King's Cross southbound, about 5 years back, all of six hours.
The only solution is to be tougher w muslims than is politically possible, and fair to the vast majority, so there will be more and more incidents across Europe. It is a nightmare of our own making with no practical solution
Two reasons:
1. Before 2001, we didn't take Islamic terrorism seriously. It's taken a long time to re-orient the security services so they're pointing at Muslim fundamentalists, but now they are. This means that large scale incidents get harder and harder to organise.
2. The Saudis (that'll be our "allies") have funded practically Islamic terrorism. It is they that have spread Wahabbi Islam (as opposed to Sufi and other more moderate sects) by spending money on Mosques and sponsoring schools. The Saudi money is drying up.
We need to stop being squeamish about pissing off the Saudis. No Wahabbism (and trust me, there's no one other than the Saudis funding these Mosques), means virtually no radicalised local Muslims.
In my original post I meant to write 'and unfair to the vast majority of muslims' by the way
* The prohibition on interest pretty much guarantees you're not going to make it in business.
Again, how the f##k did this guy ever get clearance to be an English teacher.