The government is heading for a major confrontation with junior doctors over pay restructuring. Jeremy Hunt is looking to change their terms of employment to facilitate his vision of a seven day a week health service. Junior doctors feel that the revised terms pull the rug from under them. They feel that Jeremy Hunt is spoiling for a fight and that he is looking to impose his terms on them.
Comments
If they go on strike and people can attribute patient deaths to said strike then those numbers are going to tumble.
Doctors aren't on the bread line like some of those who were going to have their tax credits cut so again they'll have less sympathy.
Striking destroys that assumption. Any strike will kill people.
http://www.mirror.co.uk/tv/tv-news/holby-city-stars-walk-out-6834118
Luvvies for Labour or is it a virtuous virtue signalling cult not at work.
Holby Junior Hospital Doctors strike in sympathy...
As for the doctors, it is an invariable rule that, come what may, they will always oppose anything government does, just as they opposed the creation of the NHS.
We trust doctors to tell the truth, because that is their job.
We expect politicians not to tell the truth, because that too comes with the job.
Doesn't mean a doctor's strike will be supported by the people.
Doctors playing politics with peoples lives in their pursuit of money, will only play one way.
But more generally, strikers don't command as much sympathy as would-be strikers. The BMA have to tread carefully here too.
https://twitter.com/SkyNews/status/666261434498736129
I would love to know how Jezza thinks that the unity of The Syrian people will prevail. Given the depth of the religious, secular, & political differences in the country I'm damned if I understand how this bloody mess will be ended by talks. I have my doubts that Cameron has much idea about who could be let alone should be ruling in Damascus. But Corbyn needs to start leaving his comfort zone behind.
I like chinese food, indian food, I likes English food um, British food. I like French foo..., uh ..
@robertsjonathan: Platitudinous crap. Might as well say 'why can't we all just hold hands and skip through meadows beneath rainbows?' https://t.co/frSxZBpety
German authorities said they have arrested an Algerian asylum seeker, whom they allege told associates early last week that bomb attacks were coming to Paris.
http://www.theguardian.com/world/live/2015/nov/16/paris-attacks-france-airstrikes-isis-raqqa-syria-live
14:50
Hunt and Osborne should hop straight to it
@IanDunt: Isis would have slaughtered every single one of them. American bombs and Kurdish troops saved them.
Watch the trust melt away when strike action is blamed for any patient deaths.
So that's a tube train full of endangered commuters for a start.
My trust is based upon my knowledge and respect for the individual concerned, and my history of dealings with them.
Even then sometimes you just get it wrong.
Mr. M, or, indeed, Putin. He didn't get Crimea by holding hands and making daisy chains.
The Drs will be damaged by strikes.
The public would like better weekend outcomes and seven day NHS
The battle may be won by Drs, but the long term position they have will be diminished. Thus Hunt wins (it may be a pyrrhic victory).
The Clergy - by definition they must be wrong, so 71% of the sample are a bit wrong-headed anyway.
The only people on the list that have an unambiguous brief are the pollsters and the newsreaders. Possibly the Journos too.
It would be interesting to see their position and movement after Batmanbatshit's interventions.
1) Have a punt, write a thread based on that
2) Have a pun, write a thread based on that
3) Can I troll the Nats with a thread, write a thread based on that
4) Same as 3 but replace Nats with Kippers
5) Can I do a thread that combines 3 and 4, write a thread on that
6) Can I compare something from antiquity to current day politics, if so do a thread on that
What he means is he's unable to conceive a set of circumstances in which he'd ever use military force.
I expect, in reality, he'd find a reason to explain away inaction every single time.
Hi everyone. I've been regularly lurking on this forum for years, but thought I'd create an account so I could tell you about something I've been working on for much of this year. I hope you don't mind if it's a bit off topic.
Over half the UK population is now non-religious and a similar number thinks religion does more harm than good. I think that number has probably increased as a result of the terrible attacks in Paris.
At the same time technology and automation is on the verge of making huge swathes (35% according to a recent study) of the population unemployed. Many people will clearly need to reskill and yet none of the political parties appear to have grasped that reskilling huge numbers of people is going to be a huge challenge.
With Labour veering to the left and the Lib Dems still reeling from the election, I think there is currently an opportunity for a new kind of political party which promotes a scientific and rational worldview. I call this the Science, Technology & Education Party (or "STEP"), and while we're not registered yet we aim to become so soon. We have a website here along with a forum and Twitter account.
So what do you guys think? It's obviously ambitious, but I think there are people out there that this will resonate with. We're looking for key people right now, and I'm hoping some of them might be reading this. If you're interested please come and join us on the forum.
Yesterday Hilary Benn was calling for peace talks. If that's Labour's position, it'll be interesting to know who they expect to take part in the talks, considering that two of the major combatannts - al Nusra and ISIS - are probably not people who are willing to talk. Or if they are, their demands might well be untenable.
For the others: the Syrian regime, the remnants of the FSA, the Kurds, and the other disparate groups - it might be possible to have talks. But that leaves a fast number of combatants and territory outside the talks.
Your problems will likely be more on the political rather than the policy side. UKIP have been serially incompetent at General Elections, going for a wide and shallow approach. I'd advise you to focus on a very small number of seats and try to win them rather than spread yourselves thin and wide, and get more votes but no seats.
You also need to decide on leadership structure, and your social approach. If you put together a liberal approach towards civil liberties and free speech with a focus on technology and science, that would be quite appealing.
Chris ShipVerified account
@chrisshipitv
Jeremy Corbyn just told us he questions the 'legality' of last week's airstrike which killed Mohammed Emwazi/#JihadiJohn
Labour are going to need every Pakistani Muslim vote they can muster in Bolton.
Syria has/had 5 distinct religions, four of them Muslim: Sunni, Shia, Druse, and Alawites. Christians also made up a large group. Since the fighting started we have also been introduced to the Yazidis and the Kurds who also call themselves muslim. They all hate each other now, but one time, under the ottomans, they seemed to have co-existed without to much trouble.
All the kings horses and all the kings men will never put Syria together again.
And we all thought Miliband was the best sleeper agent the Conservatives ever had.
Fortunately his acolytes are working against the forces of the Labour party that would seek to destabilise him :O)
Seamus Milne, John McDonnell - I salute you.
A complete and appalling waste of a very bright and brave spark.
I will never forgive those who stole her life.
Doctors - they don't know
Teachers - they especially don't know
Scientists - they don't know, and should keep quiet
Judges - they officially don't know
Clergy - they think they know but they don't
TV news - always the first not to know
Police - they should find out
Man in the street - they like not to know
Civil servants - knowing is no part of the remit
Pollsters - they know they don't know
NHS managers - they don't care that they don't know
Trade Union types - they celebrate the fact that they don't know
Business leaders - they're keen to keep quiet about not knowing
Bankers - they know, but for a percentage they'll look the other way
Journos - being the first to not know is the key
Estate agents - shoot on sight
Ministers - being seen to not know is the only peril
Politicians - don't know, but will tell you they do
If you know something we don't perhaps you should consider sharing it with the security services.
As to the will of the Syrian people, they have been polled, and Assad got a thumping majority.
Probably a thread header in it.
Regarding leadership structure (and the party's constitution generally), we have not done anything yet. I've noticed that the Greens, UKIP and now Labour have all had issues caused by their organisational structure. I'm tempted to borrow heavily from the Tories who historically seem to have evolved something that's very good at getting power. Do you have any ideas on this front?