Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » John Bickley looks set to be UKIP’s choice in Oldham & Royt

SystemSystem Posts: 12,221
edited November 2015 in General

imagepoliticalbetting.com » Blog Archive » John Bickley looks set to be UKIP’s choice in Oldham & Royton

One of the huge shocks, and what in retrospect turned out to be a good pointer to GE2015, was the way that UKIP ran LAB so close in the October 2014 by-election Heywood & Middleton which is very close to Oldham.

Read the full story here


«134

Comments

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,994
    edited November 2015
    Would be a first. UKIP have never won a Westminster seat without a defector incumbent.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Labour's choice of candidate could make the difference in a close fight. The favourite is Oldham council leader Jim McMahon:

    http://www.oldham.gov.uk/gb2
  • I think he won't get too close.

    We're just at the start of a Conservative majority, it's been a safe Labour seat for quite some time, and whilst Corbyn's madder than a mongoose there's no risk of a Labour win here putting him anywhere near the levers of power.
  • Not even Corbyn Labour could lose this one. It might be close, though, on a very low turnout.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Ah Heywood and Middleton... On at 14/1 and denied by 600 votes
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,709
    A December election is all about turnout. I suspect the CLP's supporter lists are weak since it's an uber safe seat. So it's a fairly level playing field.

    This will be the first test of Labour's swollen membership and the capability of the party to organise it.



  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    This will be about labour's ability to corral the Asian vote, won't it? 27% Oldham, 5% Heywood & Middleton - big difference I think.
  • Mr. Isam, did you hedge it?
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    John Bickley is a decent man I wish him well but I'd be amazed if he won.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    I'm confident the pakistani vote traditional Labour supporters will bring home this bet.
  • Can't see it myself. I think the H&M by elections and the lead up to the GE with the defections pretty much touched the high water mark for UKIP electorally.
  • Fear not all PB fans of Wee Tommy Harris, he's only an ex-MP, not ex-Labour.

    Jamie Ross ‏@JamieRoss7 3 mins3 minutes ago
    Tom Harris tells me he hasn't quit Labour after this message, just meant he was "giving up ranting on Facebook".
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited November 2015

    Mr. Isam, did you hedge it?

    No... It was the same day as the Clacton by election and I was door knocking in Jaywick, then off to the pub... Phone ran out of battery

    I backed UKIP on here at 5/2 at first, but managed to back and lay my way to 14/1

    The only way Ukip can win here is by tactical Tory votes... I can't see it myself
  • runnymederunnymede Posts: 2,536
    ...of course, should Labour's WWC support in Oldham shows signs of fraying, it might push Labour in some 'interesting' directions in order to get out the other chunk of their core vote..
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited November 2015
    6 of the 9 wards in the constituency are white working and lower middle-class areas, in Chadderton and Royton. 3 of the wards are in central Oldham with a significant Bangladeshi and Pakistani population.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    isam said:

    Ah Heywood and Middleton... On at 14/1 and denied by 600 votes

    darn pesky voters!
  • Richard_NabaviRichard_Nabavi Posts: 30,822
    edited November 2015
    John Bickley is definitely the right sort of candidate for this seat, and I'm sure UKIP will do well in terms of swing. However, they have a mountain to climb:

    - The relatively high Asian vote in this seat means that the demographics are less favourable than Heywood & Middleton
    - The Labour majority they are seeking to overturn is bigger than it was in H & M
    - UKIP nationally are a little weaker than they were at the time of H & M
    - They have very little time to organise themselves in this seat

    Whilst upsets do occur quite frequently in by-elections, I find it hard to see anything other than a Labour hold here. 8/1 on UKIP might just be edging into value as a speculative punt, but I'm sitting this one out.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    AndyJS said:

    6 of the 9 wards in the constituency are white working and lower middle-class areas, in Chadderton and Royton. 3 of the wards are in central Oldham with a significant Bangladeshi and Pakistani population.

    Will individual voter registration and correcting of the roll be in place for this B/E ?
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    TGOHF said:

    AndyJS said:

    6 of the 9 wards in the constituency are white working and lower middle-class areas, in Chadderton and Royton. 3 of the wards are in central Oldham with a significant Bangladeshi and Pakistani population.

    Will individual voter registration and correcting of the roll be in place for this B/E ?
    No because 1st December is the deadline for individual registration and the election is only 2 days later.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,994
    edited November 2015
    Pulpstar said:

    I'm confident the pakistani vote traditional Labour supporters will bring home this bet.

    Remember what Matt Singh wrote the other day ?

    The other factor is that in Heywood and Middleton UKIP had Ian Warren working for them and they don't have him working for them any more.
  • Owen Jones

    “Labour has to abandon anti-austerity – a term that has never really resonated with the public, despite the left’s best efforts – in favour of being pro something else… If Labour can answer these questions, it will be in a far better position: able to commit to higher wages, reduced spending on social security without throttling working families, rebalancing the economy, preparing the country for future shocks, and having a positive vision rather than simply being against Osborne’s failure… the real answer is not to gloat over his bungled mess, but to find a positive alternative that inspires the country. Over to you, Labour.”

    Higher wages?
    Reduced social security spending?
    Focus on economy and rebalancing?
    Positive vision?

    Mate, have you thought about joining the Tory party?
  • watford30watford30 Posts: 3,474
    runnymede said:

    ...of course, should Labour's WWC support in Oldham shows signs of fraying, it might push Labour in some 'interesting' directions in order to get out the other chunk of their core vote..

    Will they 'make the white folks angry'?
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,535
    Although I think Labour will win, a UKIP victory would be the most interesting result for all sorts of reasons.

    If UKIP did win, they would have two MPs: one sitting in what has been a fairly Conservative seat since the 1970s (*), and the other sitting in what is a solid Labour seat. UKIP would then have two MPs whose constituents have generally held widely different political outlooks.

    This might be a recipe for trouble, and/or a sign that UKIP can appeal strongly across the traditional left-right political split.

    (*) 1997 and 2001 in the predecessor Harwich seat being exceptions.
  • I'm sure this is old news, but Labour's candidate from May not even on the long list for the by-election?

    Yeah, probably spoke out against Seamus Milne or something.
  • Mr. Isam, a few Conservatives may turn purple ahead of the EU vote, but I concur that UKIP are very unlikely to win.
  • watford30 said:

    runnymede said:

    ...of course, should Labour's WWC support in Oldham shows signs of fraying, it might push Labour in some 'interesting' directions in order to get out the other chunk of their core vote..

    Will they 'make the white folks angry'?
    Well Phil Woolas' agent is now in UKIP. We could see a lot of angry white folk.

    I wonder what first attracted such a nasty, race baiting, obsessed with Muslims guy to join UKIP?
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    One thing in Ukip's favour is Labour have little time to organise their postal vote.

    Read what you like into that.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341
    edited November 2015
    The key number in Oldham will be the Labour vote share.

    It has fluctuated between c.45% and 59% according to the relative popularity of the leader and party since 1979.

    Top end is Blair landslide, bottom end is Brown or Foot debacle.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    watford30 said:

    runnymede said:

    ...of course, should Labour's WWC support in Oldham shows signs of fraying, it might push Labour in some 'interesting' directions in order to get out the other chunk of their core vote..

    Will they 'make the white folks angry'?
    Well Phil Woolas' agent is now in UKIP. We could see a lot of angry white folk.

    I wonder what first attracted such a nasty, race baiting, obsessed with Muslims guy to join UKIP?
    Poor you
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    watford30 said:

    runnymede said:

    ...of course, should Labour's WWC support in Oldham shows signs of fraying, it might push Labour in some 'interesting' directions in order to get out the other chunk of their core vote..

    Will they 'make the white folks angry'?
    Well Phil Woolas' agent is now in UKIP. We could see a lot of angry white folk.

    I wonder what first attracted such a nasty, race baiting, obsessed with Muslims guy to join UKIP?
    Don't troll like that - there are unpleasant people in all parties, including the Tories.

    And the thread will get boring if some of the Kippers take offence.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.
  • I'm sure this is old news, but Labour's candidate from May not even on the long list for the by-election?

    Yeah, probably spoke out against Seamus Milne or something.

    Labour's candidate from May is dead. That's why we have the by-election. So I'm not surprised he's not on the long list.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    :smiley:

    Owen Jones

    “Labour has to abandon anti-austerity – a term that has never really resonated with the public, despite the left’s best efforts – in favour of being pro something else… If Labour can answer these questions, it will be in a far better position: able to commit to higher wages, reduced spending on social security without throttling working families, rebalancing the economy, preparing the country for future shocks, and having a positive vision rather than simply being against Osborne’s failure… the real answer is not to gloat over his bungled mess, but to find a positive alternative that inspires the country. Over to you, Labour.”

    Higher wages?
    Reduced social security spending?
    Focus on economy and rebalancing?
    Positive vision?

    Mate, have you thought about joining the Tory party?

  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    antifrank said:

    I'm sure this is old news, but Labour's candidate from May not even on the long list for the by-election?

    Yeah, probably spoke out against Seamus Milne or something.

    Labour's candidate from May is dead. That's why we have the by-election. So I'm not surprised he's not on the long list.
    I think it's outrageous.

    If the dead can vote*, why can't they stand?

    * TM @Alanbrooke
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,535
    More roots of FIFA's corruption are slowly being uncovered.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34708640

    What is it about Germany and corruption at the moment? VW, football, Siemens etc.
  • John Bickley is definitely the right sort of candidate for this seat, and I'm sure UKIP will do well in terms of swing. However, they have a mountain to climb:

    - The relatively high Asian vote in this seat means that the demographics are less favourable than Heywood & Middleton
    - The Labour majority they are seeking to overturn is bigger than it was in H & M
    - UKIP nationally are a little weaker than they were at the time of H & M
    - They have very little time to organise themselves in this seat

    Whilst upsets do occur quite frequently in by-elections, I find it hard to see anything other than a Labour hold here. 8/1 on UKIP might just be edging into value as a speculative punt, but I'm sitting this one out.

    I'd buy at 12/1 - and probably at 10/1 - but not at current prices.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

  • Much as I deplore the 'mind bleach' cliche, in this case it might be apt.

    https://twitter.com/michaelsavage/status/661475932209811456
  • I'd buy at 12/1 - and probably at 10/1 - but not at current prices.

    Yeah, sounds about right.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,535

    Owen Jones

    “Labour has to abandon anti-austerity – a term that has never really resonated with the public, despite the left’s best efforts – in favour of being pro something else… If Labour can answer these questions, it will be in a far better position: able to commit to higher wages, reduced spending on social security without throttling working families, rebalancing the economy, preparing the country for future shocks, and having a positive vision rather than simply being against Osborne’s failure… the real answer is not to gloat over his bungled mess, but to find a positive alternative that inspires the country. Over to you, Labour.”

    Higher wages?
    Reduced social security spending?
    Focus on economy and rebalancing?
    Positive vision?

    Mate, have you thought about joining the Tory party?

    Jones is probably suffering from long-term columnist's droop. If you have to write one, two or more columns a week, it gets increasingly hard to keep it up. Therefore write something that provokes people and gets them talking, even if you don't really agree with it.

    It does the rest of his media career good as well: if he says something like that, he's likely to be invited to appear elsewhere to explain himself.

    People take columnists too seriously (sorry, SeanT).
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    I doubt if just 'Asian' would be good enough... In fact the wrong sort could make things worse

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    O/T:

    Would the Muslim Brotherhood in Egypt have any reason to bomb a Russian plane?
  • Mr. JS, yes, I would've thought.

    Damages the government, which is their enemy.
  • FrankBoothFrankBooth Posts: 9,929
    I suspect Labour will hang on due to it being a very safe seat and the possibility for anti-Ukip tactical voting. Doubt it will be pretty though or ease the nerves around Corbyn.

    8/1 seems over-generous though.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    I doubt if just 'Asian' would be good enough... In fact the wrong sort could make things worse

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Surely all supporters of the England and Wales Cricket Team boo Moeen Ali (along with the rest of them).
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    I doubt if just 'Asian' would be good enough... In fact the wrong sort could make things worse

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Surely all supporters of the England and Wales Cricket Team boo Moeen Ali (along with the rest of them).
    Eh ?
  • MattWMattW Posts: 23,986
    edited November 2015
    Michael Meacher, rallying the students in 1985. 0:22s.

    https://youtu.be/gbKmnuJPCDE?t=22

    (Edge of Darkness, BBC Drama).
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,344
    In response to Mr Llama (FPT):=

    Cyclefree said:

    It most certainly is not fine by me, Mr Llama. I cannot have my Garden (special Rose section) fund depleted in such a cause. I am sure, being the honourable gentleman you are, you will pay my share.

    (Mr Llama)
    Mrs Free, as, I hope, a gentleman my first reaction was to say of course I will pay your share. Then I remembered that you are in fact a lawyer and did some quick sums in my head. Alas, ma'am, I am afraid that if I paid your extra penny in income tax it would stretch my meagre pension beyond the point where I can afford to buy Thomas the Rescue his roast chicken, prawns and tuna. He would in fact be reduced to eating cat food and he would not like that.


    Mr Llama: you spoil that cat. Thomas is a very lucky feline. He eats better than me!

    But I will let you off.

    Perhaps the Weekly Scotland Independence Referendum could be paid for by a special tax on PBers insulting each other about their knowledge of EU treaties. There would probably be enough money left over to pay off the deficit.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    really ? 1 ton in 30 innings and averages 27 ? Mediocre.

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Dair said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    I doubt if just 'Asian' would be good enough... In fact the wrong sort could make things worse

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Surely all supporters of the England and Wales Cricket Team boo Moeen Ali (along with the rest of them).
    These were British supporters of the Indian cricket team booing a British Muslim of Pakistani origin

    http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/cricket/moeen-ali-interview-ill-take-fight-to-boo-boys-says-england-bowler-9857048.html
  • I would expect Labour to win this seat 19 times out of 20.

    Two things to look out for. First, turnout - how many voters feel motivated to put their cross in Labour's box on a cold Thursday evening in December? Secondly, the Lib Dem performance. In times gone by they would have been the contender. This time round, they will aspire to get close to saving their deposit.
  • John Bickley is definitely the right sort of candidate for this seat, and I'm sure UKIP will do well in terms of swing. However, they have a mountain to climb:

    - The relatively high Asian vote in this seat means that the demographics are less favourable than Heywood & Middleton
    - The Labour majority they are seeking to overturn is bigger than it was in H & M
    - UKIP nationally are a little weaker than they were at the time of H & M
    - They have very little time to organise themselves in this seat

    Whilst upsets do occur quite frequently in by-elections, I find it hard to see anything other than a Labour hold here. 8/1 on UKIP might just be edging into value as a speculative punt, but I'm sitting this one out.

    I'd buy at 12/1 - and probably at 10/1 - but not at current prices.
    I'm also sitting this one out at these prices. Which means, given my recent run of form, this is a clear UKIP win :-)
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,344

    More roots of FIFA's corruption are slowly being uncovered.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34708640

    What is it about Germany and corruption at the moment? VW, football, Siemens etc.

    Why are you surprised? It was German banks which bought much of the rubbish CDOs and CDSs pumped out by the US and UK banks. Then to get those banks out of the hole they had dug themselves into Merkel et al when round browbeating the Irish and others on fiscal responsibility. She wasn't trying to save the euro or Europe or whatever other high-minded rubbish she came out with. She was trying to save her banks from their own stupidity and failure to ask any (or any intelligent) questions and her own regulators from the consequences of their ineptness at their job.

  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,344

    Owen Jones

    “Labour has to abandon anti-austerity – a term that has never really resonated with the public, despite the left’s best efforts – in favour of being pro something else… If Labour can answer these questions, it will be in a far better position: able to commit to higher wages, reduced spending on social security without throttling working families, rebalancing the economy, preparing the country for future shocks, and having a positive vision rather than simply being against Osborne’s failure… the real answer is not to gloat over his bungled mess, but to find a positive alternative that inspires the country. Over to you, Labour.”

    Higher wages?
    Reduced social security spending?
    Focus on economy and rebalancing?
    Positive vision?

    Mate, have you thought about joining the Tory party?

    Jones is probably suffering from long-term columnist's droop. If you have to write one, two or more columns a week, it gets increasingly hard to keep it up. Therefore write something that provokes people and gets them talking, even if you don't really agree with it.

    It does the rest of his media career good as well: if he says something like that, he's likely to be invited to appear elsewhere to explain himself.

    People take columnists too seriously (sorry, SeanT).
    Where is SeanT BTW? Or is he now too rich and grand for the likes of us?

    (I rather miss him.)
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

  • antifrank said:

    I'm sure this is old news, but Labour's candidate from May not even on the long list for the by-election?

    Yeah, probably spoke out against Seamus Milne or something.

    Labour's candidate from May is dead. That's why we have the by-election. So I'm not surprised he's not on the long list.
    And I tell my students to read what they wrote! Eeesh

    :/
  • Miss Cyclefree, from his Twitter feed he's gallivanting around India at the moment.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

    His batting average in 2014 : 31.77
    His batting average in 2015 : 26.25

    Bowling average in 2014 : 28.09
    Bowling average in 2015 : 43.65

    Other players would have been dropped by now.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    antifrank said:

    I would expect Labour to win this seat 19 times out of 20.

    Two things to look out for. First, turnout - how many voters feel motivated to put their cross in Labour's box on a cold Thursday evening in December? Secondly, the Lib Dem performance. In times gone by they would have been the contender. This time round, they will aspire to get close to saving their deposit.

    Lib Dems losing their deposit has to be around 1-100.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

    His batting average in 2014 : 31.77
    His batting average in 2015 : 26.25

    Bowling average in 2014 : 28.09
    Bowling average in 2015 : 43.65

    Other players would have been dropped by now.
    I know when I'm beaten :-(

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

    His batting average in 2014 : 31.77
    His batting average in 2015 : 26.25

    Bowling average in 2014 : 28.09
    Bowling average in 2015 : 43.65

    Other players would have been dropped by now.
    I know when I'm beaten :-(

    He got a lot of wickets vs India last summer - been living off that for 16 months.

  • Pulpstar said:

    antifrank said:

    I would expect Labour to win this seat 19 times out of 20.

    Two things to look out for. First, turnout - how many voters feel motivated to put their cross in Labour's box on a cold Thursday evening in December? Secondly, the Lib Dem performance. In times gone by they would have been the contender. This time round, they will aspire to get close to saving their deposit.

    Lib Dems losing their deposit has to be around 1-100.
    I'll take that!
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    Pakistan back in charge of the test.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

    His batting average in 2014 : 31.77
    His batting average in 2015 : 26.25

    Bowling average in 2014 : 28.09
    Bowling average in 2015 : 43.65

    Other players would have been dropped by now.
    I know when I'm beaten :-(

    He got a lot of wickets vs India last summer - been living off that for 16 months.

    Be fair, Lyth had to be dropped and we needed an opener... He can also spin the ball, it was worth a try in this series

    In SA I guess Hakes will open and Ali will be back at 8 or fighting it out with Rashid for that spot
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    isam said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

    His batting average in 2014 : 31.77
    His batting average in 2015 : 26.25

    Bowling average in 2014 : 28.09
    Bowling average in 2015 : 43.65

    Other players would have been dropped by now.
    I know when I'm beaten :-(

    He got a lot of wickets vs India last summer - been living off that for 16 months.

    Be fair, Lyth had to be dropped and we needed an opener... He can also spin the ball, it was worth a try in this series

    In SA I guess Hakes will open and Ali will be back at 8 or fighting it out with Rashid for that spot
    The Surrey lad Ansari who broke his thumb on the day he was selected is rated highly - he might have played this series had that not happened. He can bowl spin too.

  • LennonLennon Posts: 1,782
    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

    His batting average in 2014 : 31.77
    His batting average in 2015 : 26.25

    Bowling average in 2014 : 28.09
    Bowling average in 2015 : 43.65

    Other players would have been dropped by now.
    I know when I'm beaten :-(

    He got a lot of wickets vs India last summer - been living off that for 16 months.

    Be fair, Lyth had to be dropped and we needed an opener... He can also spin the ball, it was worth a try in this series

    In SA I guess Hakes will open and Ali will be back at 8 or fighting it out with Rashid for that spot
    The Surrey lad Ansari who broke his thumb on the day he was selected is rated highly - he might have played this series had that not happened. He can bowl spin too.

    As a Surrey regular, I rate Ansari very highly indeed - potential future England captain if things go well for him and he wants it.
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 43,535
    Cyclefree said:

    More roots of FIFA's corruption are slowly being uncovered.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34708640

    What is it about Germany and corruption at the moment? VW, football, Siemens etc.

    Why are you surprised? It was German banks which bought much of the rubbish CDOs and CDSs pumped out by the US and UK banks. Then to get those banks out of the hole they had dug themselves into Merkel et al when round browbeating the Irish and others on fiscal responsibility. She wasn't trying to save the euro or Europe or whatever other high-minded rubbish she came out with. She was trying to save her banks from their own stupidity and failure to ask any (or any intelligent) questions and her own regulators from the consequences of their ineptness at their job.

    I'm not surprised. I'm not saying we're perfect here in the UK - we have our own corruption. But Germany seems to have it much worse.

    I mean, what can you say about a country where this sort of thing was thought to be a good idea by a major institution?

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/19/sex-party-reward-german-salesmen
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Lennon said:

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    TGOHF said:

    isam said:

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    Look how the British Indian supporters boo Moeen Ali
    Suggests they know a very average cricketer when they see one.
    He's not an opening batsman that's for sure, but he's a very good middle order batsman

    He seemed to have improved during the summer

    His batting average in 2014 : 31.77
    His batting average in 2015 : 26.25

    Bowling average in 2014 : 28.09
    Bowling average in 2015 : 43.65

    Other players would have been dropped by now.
    I know when I'm beaten :-(

    He got a lot of wickets vs India last summer - been living off that for 16 months.

    Be fair, Lyth had to be dropped and we needed an opener... He can also spin the ball, it was worth a try in this series

    In SA I guess Hakes will open and Ali will be back at 8 or fighting it out with Rashid for that spot
    The Surrey lad Ansari who broke his thumb on the day he was selected is rated highly - he might have played this series had that not happened. He can bowl spin too.

    As a Surrey regular, I rate Ansari very highly indeed - potential future England captain if things go well for him and he wants it.
    South Africa could be a real baptism of fire for him - Steyn etc piling in on home turf - could make him right enough.
  • CyclefreeCyclefree Posts: 25,344

    Cyclefree said:

    More roots of FIFA's corruption are slowly being uncovered.

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-34708640

    What is it about Germany and corruption at the moment? VW, football, Siemens etc.

    Why are you surprised? It was German banks which bought much of the rubbish CDOs and CDSs pumped out by the US and UK banks. Then to get those banks out of the hole they had dug themselves into Merkel et al when round browbeating the Irish and others on fiscal responsibility. She wasn't trying to save the euro or Europe or whatever other high-minded rubbish she came out with. She was trying to save her banks from their own stupidity and failure to ask any (or any intelligent) questions and her own regulators from the consequences of their ineptness at their job.

    I'm not surprised. I'm not saying we're perfect here in the UK - we have our own corruption. But Germany seems to have it much worse.

    I mean, what can you say about a country where this sort of thing was thought to be a good idea by a major institution?

    http://www.theguardian.com/world/2011/may/19/sex-party-reward-german-salesmen
    Well, quite.

    Worth remembering that in Germany insider dealing was only made a criminal offence relatively recently, certainly later than in the UK. And it takes quite a long time after that before those in the business really understand that it is wrong and a bit longer after that before they act on that understanding.

    And even now I'm not sure all get it.

    Last time a young man in one of the local City bars was heard saying: "It's not crooked. It's smart."

    Oh dear........

  • On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?
  • AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    What on earth are you talking about? What is "planting an Asian" and why would it be something to be criticised?

    Planting someone who is not local happens all the time and is criticised by other parties (unless they've done the same) when it happens. Though realistically the best candidate may not always be local. I'm not sure how race plays into it though, we shouldn't judge any candidate on their race.
  • chestnutchestnut Posts: 7,341

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    Lib Dems = non-existent vote, surely?
  • MikeSmithsonMikeSmithson Posts: 7,382
    edited November 2015
    Pulpstar said:

    antifrank said:

    I would expect Labour to win this seat 19 times out of 20.

    Two things to look out for. First, turnout - how many voters feel motivated to put their cross in Labour's box on a cold Thursday evening in December? Secondly, the Lib Dem performance. In times gone by they would have been the contender. This time round, they will aspire to get close to saving their deposit.

    Lib Dems losing their deposit has to be around 1-100.
    OK. I'll lay that £5 or what you feel you can risk.
  • Plato_SaysPlato_Says Posts: 11,822
    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/Jeremy_Corbyn/11970826/The-fight-for-Labours-soul-is-just-beginning.html
    “What’s the one thing all of Corbyn’s recent appointments have in common?” a shadow cabinet member asked me yesterday. “It’s this. They all hate the Labour Party. They think Labour gets in the way and prevents the voters embracing true revolutionary socialism.”
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited November 2015

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    In Chadderton, Royton and Hollinwood (6 wards) the 2015 local election results were Lab 46.1%, UKIP 27.1%, Con 19.8%, LD 3.6%, Green 3.4%. These wards are 89.4% white and 6.6% Bangladeshi/Pakistani.

    In the other 3 wards — Coldhurst, Medlock Vale, Werneth — the 2015 local election results were Lab 63.8%, UKIP 17.0%, Con 8.4%, LD 8.4%, Green 2.4%. These wards are 37.0% white and 53.7% Bangladeshi/Pakistani.

    http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/2015guide/oldhamwestandroyton/

    The local election results match up pretty well with the general election result.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584
    chestnut said:

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    Lib Dems = non-existent vote, surely?
    They got 3.7% at the GE.

    And they might recover a bit.

  • chestnut said:

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    Lib Dems = non-existent vote, surely?
    They got 3.7% at the GE.

    And they might recover a bit.

    They also might fall further.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    edited November 2015

    chestnut said:

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    Lib Dems = non-existent vote, surely?
    They got 3.7% at the GE.

    And they might recover a bit.

    I think that's extremely unlikely. I'd bet a fair amount they'll go down rather than up.
  • LennonLennon Posts: 1,782

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    2011 Census data has Muslim at 24.58% of the Constituency. (for comparison, Heywood and Middleton is 3.85%)
  • taffystaffys Posts: 9,753
    It'll be fascinating to see how Corbynite labour affects the muslim and WWC vote in this constituency.
  • blackburn63blackburn63 Posts: 4,492

    AndyJS said:

    The Tory candidate choice could be important. At the general election it was Kamran Ghafoor. In Oldham East & Saddleworth their candidate was Sajjad Hussain who had a pretty good result with the Tories coming second for the first time since the seat was created.

    Haha, imagine TSE's faux outrage if Ukip had planted an Asian in a seat such as Oldham.

    Incidentally, we don't hear much of Amjad Bashir since he left Ukip to join the tories.

    What on earth are you talking about? What is "planting an Asian" and why would it be something to be criticised?

    Planting someone who is not local happens all the time and is criticised by other parties (unless they've done the same) when it happens. Though realistically the best candidate may not always be local. I'm not sure how race plays into it though, we shouldn't judge any candidate on their race.
    I suggest you tell that to TSE, he won't agree with you.

    I don't judge anybody by their race, candidate or not, have a look through the thread.


  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    For Oldham or the country as a whole?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,049
    Why does everyone think that the asian vote will automatically vote Lab?

    If I was a recent immigrant perhaps, but any older generation I would vote Cons to aspire or UKIP to haul up the ladder behind me.

    I don't think anyone has trouble finding immigrants of all flavours being at least as much and often more anti-new-immigrant than anyone else.

    Plus all this new (small "n") Lab class war stuff means nothing to immigrants as indeed it means nothing to anyone sensible.
  • MarkHopkinsMarkHopkins Posts: 5,584

    Thatcher's Clothes And Jewels To Be Sold Off

    http://news.sky.com/gallery/1580841/thatchers-wardrobe-to-be-sold-off

  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    TOPPING said:

    Why does everyone think that the asian vote will automatically vote Lab?

    If I was a recent immigrant perhaps, but any older generation I would vote Cons to aspire or UKIP to haul up the ladder behind me.

    I don't think anyone has trouble finding immigrants of all flavours being at least as much and often more anti-new-immigrant than anyone else.

    Plus all this new (small "n") Lab class war stuff means nothing to immigrants as indeed it means nothing to anyone sensible.

    Asian voters are becoming more likely to vote Conservative. That's bad news for Labour of course in this seat.
  • Mrs Thatcher's snuff box?
  • taffys said:

    It'll be fascinating to see how Corbynite labour affects the muslim and WWC vote in this constituency.

    It will be fascinating to see how it is spun. Taken singly, it is hard to read much into byelections. The main problem for those opposed to Corbyn is who on earth do you replace him with? In due course, new stars will emerge from the Shadow Cabinet, and probably from those who stood for deputy leader. Until then, TINA.
  • I hesitate to post this, but it seems to me that it's a useful addition to the debate: Denis MacShane has given 12 reasons why Britain will vote to leave the EU.

    http://www.politico.eu/article/12-reasons-why-cameron-will-lose-on-brexit-tories-euroskeptic/
  • watford30watford30 Posts: 3,474
    edited November 2015
    antifrank said:

    I hesitate to post this, but it seems to me that it's a useful addition to the debate: Denis MacShane has given 12 reasons why Britain will vote to leave the EU.

    http://www.politico.eu/article/12-reasons-why-cameron-will-lose-on-brexit-tories-euroskeptic/

    1 reason for every laptop in jailbird McShane's garage.

    It reads more as '12 reasons not to vote Out', with the usual scaremongering about Hedge Funds and Media ownership. But that's what one would expect from a convicted fraudster and former Minister for Europe.
  • On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    Obviously I don't have any evidence either way but I do hope that in this case you are wrong. It would be a very sad thing for electoral choices to come down to something as stark as racial differences.
  • Many thanks for the replies to my earlier post.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,421
    edited November 2015



    Pulpstar said:

    antifrank said:

    I would expect Labour to win this seat 19 times out of 20.

    Two things to look out for. First, turnout - how many voters feel motivated to put their cross in Labour's box on a cold Thursday evening in December? Secondly, the Lib Dem performance. In times gone by they would have been the contender. This time round, they will aspire to get close to saving their deposit.

    Lib Dems losing their deposit has to be around 1-100.
    OK. I'll lay that £5 or what you feel you can risk.
    Hmm Seems LD held their deposit in Heywood and Middleton. Since I'd rather be wrong than poor, I'll pass :)
  • antifrank said:

    I hesitate to post this, but it seems to me that it's a useful addition to the debate: Denis MacShane has given 12 reasons why Britain will vote to leave the EU.

    http://www.politico.eu/article/12-reasons-why-cameron-will-lose-on-brexit-tories-euroskeptic/

    Interesting. Some points I agree with, some I don't. One point he is wrong on though is Open Europe being pro-Brexit. They have always made it clear that they are firmly in the reform from within camp. It is kind of summed up in their name.
  • Pulpstar said:



    Pulpstar said:

    antifrank said:

    I would expect Labour to win this seat 19 times out of 20.

    Two things to look out for. First, turnout - how many voters feel motivated to put their cross in Labour's box on a cold Thursday evening in December? Secondly, the Lib Dem performance. In times gone by they would have been the contender. This time round, they will aspire to get close to saving their deposit.

    Lib Dems losing their deposit has to be around 1-100.
    OK. I'll lay that £5 or what you feel you can risk.
    Hmm Seems LD held their deposit in Heywood and Middleton. Since I'd rather be wrong than poor, I'll pass :)
    Damn.
  • antifrank said:

    I hesitate to post this, but it seems to me that it's a useful addition to the debate: Denis MacShane has given 12 reasons why Britain will vote to leave the EU.

    http://www.politico.eu/article/12-reasons-why-cameron-will-lose-on-brexit-tories-euroskeptic/

    Reason Number 13 = Because of the example of europhiles such as McShane.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    On topic

    This should be a good test of my theory that elections are increasingly about race rather than class.

    Let's look at the following:- Labour = Muslim vote; UKIP = white working class vote, Tories = white middle-class (and aspirational) vote, LibDems = non-white, non-Muslim vote.

    Does anyone have any census or other data for these categories?

    Obviously I don't have any evidence either way but I do hope that in this case you are wrong. It would be a very sad thing for electoral choices to come down to something as stark as racial differences.
    That's the way it is now unfortunately. Where America leads we follow.
  • DairDair Posts: 6,108
    Pulpstar said:

    antifrank said:

    I would expect Labour to win this seat 19 times out of 20.

    Two things to look out for. First, turnout - how many voters feel motivated to put their cross in Labour's box on a cold Thursday evening in December? Secondly, the Lib Dem performance. In times gone by they would have been the contender. This time round, they will aspire to get close to saving their deposit.

    Lib Dems losing their deposit has to be around 1-100.
    Speaking of the yellow irrelevance do we know when OFCOM can be expected to rule on their Minor Party status? It seems utterly worthless to waste hours of broadcast coverage on that party during the upcoming byelections.
Sign In or Register to comment.