Economics 101 David Smith in the Sunday Times points out that our growth since 1Q 2010 has matched America's. Revisions to the ONS figures show there were no double or triple dip recession and we had stronger growth in 2011 than 2010 when everyone was screaming against so called austerity. So sorry all you dim lefties, Osborne's policies did not stunt growth. You will have to find another fantasy world to live in.
It seems we are likely to see a slowdown in jobs growth and an increase in productivity in future.
Oh dear. Mr Blanchflower wrong again. Corbyn clearly choosing advisors from the bottom of the barrel.
I think most of his advisors have crawled out from under the barrel.
MG You have convinced me..you are obviously a severe case and I will discount my fee..all lessons from now on will be free..this may be seen as a benefit in kind so please inform the HMRC...I will.
MG You have convinced me..you are obviously a severe case and I will discount my fee..all lessons from now on will be free..this may be seen as a benefit in kind so please inform the HMRC...I will.
Dribble dribble dribble Dotage man
Malcom G wittered: Most of these are just a fiddle though, PAYE employees do not get the option to offset anything and everything, you just get hammered. You get massive benefits in dividends and what you can claim against versus PAYE.
But, for me. You can't have the penny and the bun. Being self employed has advantages, so does being self employed. The reverse also applies. I've been both .... for a while at the same time!
Now I'm retired with a bus pass and, now, a free TV licence (why??).
Ilkley's nice. Went up on the Moor in the past, usually with a hound bounding around.
Was also nice after the Tour de France. As per the song, I remembered to take my hat (just as well, as it pissed it down).
How is the new mutt, Mr D.? Should be developing nicely into a young dog by now, any chance of more pictures?
Afternoon Hurst, saw your post earlier, given the riff raff and tone on today I am not as ebullient as yesterday , doubt I will stick around long tonight.
I think it's Mr Hurst to you!
Oi! It might be Mr. Hurst, or it might not be (depends where I am identifying today) . Mr., Mrs., Miss, Ms G has gone for the informal approach, not something of which I would normally approve but, in this multi-gender world, understandable in the interests of brevity aside from anything else. What must surely be wrong is for you to decide how he should address me when you don't know how I am identifying.
As it happens I am thinking of asking you all to call me Loretta in future because I want to have babies.
MG You have convinced me..you are obviously a severe case and I will discount my fee..all lessons from now on will be free..this may be seen as a benefit in kind so please inform the HMRC...I will.
Dribble dribble dribble Dotage man
Malcom G wittered: Most of these are just a fiddle though, PAYE employees do not get the option to offset anything and everything, you just get hammered. You get massive benefits in dividends and what you can claim against versus PAYE.
But, for me. You can't have the penny and the bun. Being self employed has advantages, so does being self employed. The reverse also applies. I've been both .... for a while at the same time!
Now I'm retired with a bus pass and, now, a free TV licence (why??).
Exactly , as stated if someone doesn't like it then get a PAYE job. Working as company brings lots more benefits , so should be no need for whinging. Also if you don't like travelling get a job near home or move house.
Ilkley's nice. Went up on the Moor in the past, usually with a hound bounding around.
Was also nice after the Tour de France. As per the song, I remembered to take my hat (just as well, as it pissed it down).
How is the new mutt, Mr D.? Should be developing nicely into a young dog by now, any chance of more pictures?
Afternoon Hurst, saw your post earlier, given the riff raff and tone on today I am not as ebullient as yesterday , doubt I will stick around long tonight.
I think it's Mr Hurst to you!
Oi! It might be Mr. Hurst, or it might not be (depends where I am identifying today) . Mr., Mrs., Miss, Ms G has gone for the informal approach, not something of which I would normally approve but, in this multi-gender world, understandable in the interests of brevity aside from anything else. What must surely be wrong is for you to decide how he should address me when you don't know how I am identifying.
As it happens I am thinking of asking you all to call me Loretta in future because I want to have babies.
Hurst , I am now concerned to be anything but vague in case I upset anyone, who knows what is going on nowadays. However I am being ordered to the shops for supplies , have a great evening.
Ilkley's nice. Went up on the Moor in the past, usually with a hound bounding around.
Was also nice after the Tour de France. As per the song, I remembered to take my hat (just as well, as it pissed it down).
How is the new mutt, Mr D.? Should be developing nicely into a young dog by now, any chance of more pictures?
Afternoon Hurst, saw your post earlier, given the riff raff and tone on today I am not as ebullient as yesterday , doubt I will stick around long tonight.
I think it's Mr Hurst to you!
Oi! It might be Mr. Hurst, or it might not be (depends where I am identifying today) . Mr., Mrs., Miss, Ms G has gone for the informal approach, not something of which I would normally approve but, in this multi-gender world, understandable in the interests of brevity aside from anything else. What must surely be wrong is for you to decide how he should address me when you don't know how I am identifying.
As it happens I am thinking of asking you all to call me Loretta in future because I want to have babies.
Hurst , I am now concerned to be anything but vague in case I upset anyone, who knows what is going on nowadays. However I am being ordered to the shops for supplies , have a great evening.
Ilkley's nice. Went up on the Moor in the past, usually with a hound bounding around.
Was also nice after the Tour de France. As per the song, I remembered to take my hat (just as well, as it pissed it down).
How is the new mutt, Mr D.? Should be developing nicely into a young dog by now, any chance of more pictures?
Afternoon Hurst, saw your post earlier, given the riff raff and tone on today I am not as ebullient as yesterday , doubt I will stick around long tonight.
I think it's Mr Hurst to you!
Oi! It might be Mr. Hurst, or it might not be (depends where I am identifying today) . Mr., Mrs., Miss, Ms G has gone for the informal approach, not something of which I would normally approve but, in this multi-gender world, understandable in the interests of brevity aside from anything else. What must surely be wrong is for you to decide how he should address me when you don't know how I am identifying.
As it happens I am thinking of asking you all to call me Loretta in future because I want to have babies.
If you thought Nigel Farage was a swivel eyed loon, this Guy Verhofstadt is in a league of his own. This is what the Europhiles really have in mind for us:
Fair enough. My view is tolerance and freedom but that the traditional family unit is so fundamental to a free and stable society that the government should encourage and promote it.
Plenty of social liberals would disagree with that.
Mr. Royale, when you say a traditional family unit do you mean a woman and man in wedlock and their children (together with the extended family grandparents, aunts, uncles cousins etc.)? If so then your idea that the state should encourage and promote such an institution puts you beyond the pale. Never mind social liberals, even the modern Conservative Party will see such attitudes as belonging to some ghastly person unfit to take part in human discourse.
I would regard the traditional family as two adults in wedlock, observing monogamy, plus any children born to them.
I suppose we are to assume these adults are cisgender and from the male and female sections of the three possible sexes? Pfff
I'm sorry, I get you're being sarcastic, but I don't understand your point. Are you protesting the idea that gay people should be able to participate in the traditional family model?
I believe he is commenting from viewpoint of a great discussion we had last night, which if you had been in it makes it funny comment.
Of course, the idea that there are a mere three sexes is laughably naive, but we forgive Isam because we love him here.
Have to say I was lost last night with the amount of sexes available, was amazed that there were more than two.
Fair enough. My view is tolerance and freedom but that the traditional family unit is so fundamental to a free and stable society that the government should encourage and promote it.
Plenty of social liberals would disagree with that.
Mr. Royale, when you say a traditional family unit do you mean a woman and man in wedlock and their children (together with the extended family grandparents, aunts, uncles cousins etc.)? If so then your idea that the state should encourage and promote such an institution puts you beyond the pale. Never mind social liberals, even the modern Conservative Party will see such attitudes as belonging to some ghastly person unfit to take part in human discourse.
both
I would regard the traditional family as two adults in wedlock, observing monogamy, plus any children born to them.
I suppose we are to assume these adults are cisgender and from the male and female sections of the three possible sexes? Pfff
I'm sorry, I get you're being sarcastic, but I don't understand your point. Are you protesting the idea that gay people should be able to participate in the traditional family model?
I believe he is commenting from viewpoint of a great discussion we had last night, which if you had been in it makes it funny comment.
Of course, the idea that there are a mere three sexes is laughably naive, but we forgive Isam because we love him here.
Have to say I was lost last night with the amount of sexes available, was amazed that there were more than two.
You are correct. There are only two.
You are both wrong. Leaving aside psychological gender associations, there are also biologically more than two sexes.
Economics 101 David Smith in the Sunday Times points out that our growth since 1Q 2010 has matched America's. Revisions to the ONS figures show there were no double or triple dip recession and we had stronger growth in 2011 than 2010 when everyone was screaming against so called austerity. So sorry all you dim lefties, Osborne's policies did not stunt growth. You will have to find another fantasy world to live in.
It seems we are likely to see a slowdown in jobs growth and an increase in productivity in future.
So in spite of very solid growth he has still missed his borrowing targets by the proverbial mile. Eliminating the deficit over the course of the last parliament being the central plank of his plan lest we forget. Thank god he didn't stay the course.
Fair enough. My view is tolerance and freedom but that the traditional family unit is so fundamental to a free and stable society that the government should encourage and promote it.
Plenty of social liberals would disagree with that.
Mr. Royale, when you say a traditional family unit do you mean a woman and man in wedlock and their children (together with the extended family grandparents, aunts, uncles cousins etc.)? If so then your idea that the state should encourage and promote such an institution puts you beyond the pale. Never mind social liberals, even the modern Conservative Party will see such attitudes as belonging to some ghastly person unfit to take part in human discourse.
both
I would regard the traditional family as two adults in wedlock, observing monogamy, plus any children born to them.
I suppose we are to assume these adults are cisgender and from the male and female sections of the three possible sexes? Pfff
I'm sorry, I get you're being sarcastic, but I don't understand your point. Are you protesting the idea that gay people should be able to participate in the traditional family model?
I believe he is commenting from viewpoint of a great discussion we had last night, which if you had been in it makes it funny comment.
Of course, the idea that there are a mere three sexes is laughably naive, but we forgive Isam because we love him here.
Have to say I was lost last night with the amount of sexes available, was amazed that there were more than two.
You are correct. There are only two.
You are both wrong. Leaving aside psychological gender associations, there are also biologically more than two sexes.
Fair enough. My view is tolerance and freedom but that the traditional family unit is so fundamental to a free and stable society that the government should encourage and promote it.
Plenty of social liberals would disagree with that.
Mr. Royale, when you say a traditional family unit do you mean a woman and man in wedlock and their children (together with the extended family grandparents, aunts, uncles cousins etc.)? If so then your idea that the state should encourage and promote such an institution puts you beyond the pale. Never mind social liberals, even the modern Conservative Party will see such attitudes as belonging to some ghastly person unfit to take part in human discourse.
I would regard the traditional family as two adults in wedlock, observing monogamy, plus any children born to them.
I suppose we are to assume these adults are cisgender and from the male and female sections of the three possible sexes? Pfff
I'm sorry, I get you're being sarcastic, but I don't understand your point. Are you protesting the idea that gay people should be able to participate in the traditional family model?
I believe he is commenting from viewpoint of a great discussion we had last night, which if you had been in it makes it funny comment.
Of course, the idea that there are a mere three sexes is laughably naive, but we forgive Isam because we love him here.
Sorry, I was guided by Dair's post yesterday that stated the blatantly obvious, long accepted truth that humans are easily divided into either male, female or intersex... the three standards
Cameron's speech seems to have brought out the best in the Tories today , they are snarling and gnashing on every post. It was supposed to be great as well.
Its not just the Tories who have been impressed
Who else , tell me
Many labour members reflecting on what could have been if they hadn't lost their marbles
Thanks, wires leading to explosives from the 60s. Must have been a Friday afternoon job.
The explanation is more far fetched than any of Blaster Bates' tales.
We'll see - I suspect it is just media reporting that has muddled it a bit. My guess is that there was some leftover det cord from the old 1960s blasting of the routes for the first road bridge. I wondered if the 'wires' were prestressed concrete that hadn't been severed, but the EOD were there.
I can't recall having heard of this happen on a construction site before, at least with alleged demo explosives that are so old. Plenty of cases of explosives found during construction, but those are usually the sort dropped from 10,000 feet and higher.
Economics 101 David Smith in the Sunday Times points out that our growth since 1Q 2010 has matched America's. Revisions to the ONS figures show there were no double or triple dip recession and we had stronger growth in 2011 than 2010 when everyone was screaming against so called austerity. So sorry all you dim lefties, Osborne's policies did not stunt growth. You will have to find another fantasy world to live in.
It seems we are likely to see a slowdown in jobs growth and an increase in productivity in future.
So in spite of very solid growth he has still missed his borrowing targets by the proverbial mile. Eliminating the deficit over the course of the last parliament being the central plank of his plan lest we forget. Thank god he didn't stay the course.
He did not say eliminate the deficit, he said eliminate the structural deficit. The structural deficit proved to be bigger. Again read the articles on this by David Smith
Comments
Most of these are just a fiddle though, PAYE employees do not get the option to offset anything and everything, you just get hammered. You get massive benefits in dividends and what you can claim against versus PAYE.
But, for me.
You can't have the penny and the bun. Being self employed has advantages, so does being self employed. The reverse also applies. I've been both .... for a while at the same time!
Now I'm retired with a bus pass and, now, a free TV licence (why??).
As it happens I am thinking of asking you all to call me Loretta in future because I want to have babies.
You can't have the penny and the bun. Being self employed has advantages, so does being self employed. The reverse also applies. I've been both .... for a while at the same time!
Now I'm retired with a bus pass and, now, a free TV licence (why??).
Exactly , as stated if someone doesn't like it then get a PAYE job. Working as company brings lots more benefits , so should be no need for whinging. Also if you don't like travelling get a job near home or move house.
BREAKING: Sepp Blatter has been suspended for 90 days by FIFA's ethics committee.
What a strange concept.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twelve_Apostles,_West_Yorkshire
I removed not only my hat, but all the rest of my clothes as well.
Pure idiocy. And then he fulfils Godwin's law. What is most scary is how the parliament applauds him. I really do not want to be ruled by this body.
Left wingers called me "terrorist"; said I can't be Tory as I'm not "white", tried to egg me - a new kinder politics http://t.co/pBjEy3ke5V
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intersex
Harvard's debate team loses to a group of New York inmates http://t.co/aQ4S3sUAah http://t.co/IQXv4zKVis
Not that such pedantry would have made Caster Semenya feel any better when she was so disgracefully treated by the IAAF.
...and the latest Yesser boycott is..... Eamonn Holmes.
No idea why, but as you can see, they are as nasty as ever. http://t.co/BaKXzJvPe9