Skip to content

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Great speech by Boris – but it’s had no impact on Betfair

124»

Comments

  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    Pulpstar said:

    Have watched Zac and Boris' speeches.

    Thought Zac was alot better personally.

    Boris' just went on and on and.....

    Yes, I thought it was time to have another try at understanding why Boris is wonderful, so I watched the clip on this thread. Tedious, rambling and self-indulgent as ever. But popular.

    Mystery.
    And yet he is an MP and you are not. Excellent result.
  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    FPT Thanks to Callum for posting the link to the Lallands Peat Worrier blog on the Scottish Mortgage affair - good post (until he chose to focus on Jackie Balllie's question, not Ruth Davidson, which like Sturgeon he ignores), however, the key observation is:

    Even if you read this paragraph - and only this paragraph - from the decision - it scotches the idea that this is an empty and partisan scandal whipped up by a hostile media.

    http://lallandspeatworrier.blogspot.co.id
  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    Clinton's email scandal just rolls along. To recap - the FBI is recovering 'almost all' the deleted emails from Clinton's server. State has asked the FBI to give it copies, a reasonable request which has apparently been acceded to.

    Today Fox and CNN are reporting that State is pressuring Clinton's personal lawyer to re-confirm that Clinton turned over ALL the official emails, which she has sworn she did, under penalty of perjury.

    This is not good for her.
  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    GeoffM said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Have watched Zac and Boris' speeches.

    Thought Zac was alot better personally.

    Boris' just went on and on and.....

    Yes, I thought it was time to have another try at understanding why Boris is wonderful, so I watched the clip on this thread. Tedious, rambling and self-indulgent as ever. But popular.

    Mystery.
    And yet he is an MP and you are not. Excellent result.
    You could apply Nick's comment to Obama......
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395

    They are related Andy in the same way Dutch is related to German (and to a lesser extent so is English) but they're not the same thing.

    Thanks for the replies. On Boris, I can´t understand what his appeal is either.
  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    Speaking of Chic-Fil-A, the IHOP (International House of Pancakes) in Greenbriar Mall, the mall which was the site of the first Chic-Fil-A, has closed after failing a health inspection.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Starling figures from Quebec, with the Conservatives tied for first place with the NDP:

    https://twitter.com/MVLibertas/status/651510005204709376
  • Tim_BTim_B Posts: 7,669
    Starling (startling?) doesn't begin to describe it - 35 years ago I used to work in Montreal for a French company, and the PQ with Rene Levesque was so far ahead it wasn't even contestable. I actually bought a Cadillac Coupe de Ville from the NDP Ontario leader Stephen Lewis.
    AndyJS said:

    Starling (sic) figures from Quebec, with the Conservatives tied for first place with the NDP:

    https://twitter.com/MVLibertas/status/651510005204709376

  • CarlottaVanceCarlottaVance Posts: 60,422
    Tim_B said:

    Starling (startling?) doesn't begin to describe it - 35 years ago I used to work in Montreal for a French company, and the PQ with Rene Levesque was so far ahead it wasn't even contestable.

    Remind you of anywhere?

  • Tim_B said:

    Starling (startling?) doesn't begin to describe it - 35 years ago I used to work in Montreal for a French company, and the PQ with Rene Levesque was so far ahead it wasn't even contestable.

    Remind you of anywhere?

    India under Congress in the 1950s and 60s? :)
  • Moses_Moses_ Posts: 4,865
    surbiton said:

    IDS introduces the government's two-children policy. Another reason why this country will need more immigrants in the future.

    You can have 20 children if your loins are up to it....Just don't expect me to pay for them .....ok!

  • RobDRobD Posts: 60,673
    edited October 2015
    AndyJS said:

    Starling figures from Quebec, with the Conservatives tied for first place with the NDP:

    twitter.com/MVLibertas/status/651510005204709376

    Swingback? Look at that Tory lead in Alberta!
  • JosiasJessopJosiasJessop Posts: 46,710
    LucyJones said:

    @JosiasJessop



    One of the worst thing for me about having a kid is that my long walks have had to be curtailed. He can just about manage two or three hours in the pram as long as I stop at every playground we pass (on one walk we stopped at all five playgrounds in our village), but day- or week-long walks are an impossibility.

    And when I do get the opportunity, I become a stupid idiot and break my elbow on the first day. :0

    My advice to you would be to get him a balance bike as soon as possible. One with pneumatic tyres and a metal frame, not one of those silly wooden ones. My daughter would go for miles on one, and I would just have to jog along behind. They can handle reasonably uneven ground and unmade footpaths and make learning to ride a proper bike a doddle. Suitable for about 2 year-olds and older. Took my daughter a couple of days to get the hang of it. We had a Puky one - best toy we ever got in terms of the amount of pleasure derived from it.

    Thanks for that - I've seen a couple of them about, but knew nothing about them. It seems like an ideal buy for the little 'un.
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,315
    surbiton said:

    IDS introduces the government's two-children policy. Another reason why this country will need more immigrants in the future.

    People can't have more than two children unless the state pays them to? How ever did families manage it before the welfare state?
  • kle4kle4 Posts: 99,315

    Pulpstar said:

    Have watched Zac and Boris' speeches.

    Thought Zac was alot better personally.

    Boris' just went on and on and.....

    Yes, I thought it was time to have another try at understanding why Boris is wonderful, so I watched the clip on this thread. Tedious, rambling and self-indulgent as ever. But popular.

    Mystery.
    There's no mystery, he has personality. People like Galloway for the reason. They enjoy some variety that such people provide. Doesn't mean they will go on to be successes, but there's nothing mysterious about why people like them, and actual competence or their actual views need not play into it much.
  • flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903
    edited October 2015
    kle4 said:

    Pulpstar said:

    Have watched Zac and Boris' speeches.

    Thought Zac was alot better personally.

    Boris' just went on and on and.....

    Yes, I thought it was time to have another try at understanding why Boris is wonderful, so I watched the clip on this thread. Tedious, rambling and self-indulgent as ever. But popular.

    Mystery.
    There's no mystery, he has personality. People like Galloway for the reason. They enjoy some variety that such people provide. Doesn't mean they will go on to be successes, but there's nothing mysterious about why people like them, and actual competence or their actual views need not play into it much.
    Yes.
    Palmer witters on about wondering why Boris is so popular, as if anyone believes a word he says. But here speaks a man who makes tortuous excuses as to why he is happy to vote for and support Corbyn.
    'Self indulgent' he says. Hah. Not much self awareness there.
  • flightpath01flightpath01 Posts: 4,903
    edited October 2015
    Sean_F said:

    JEO said:

    The effect on immigration of sealing off a route where anyone from the whole of the EU can come without a visa would be zero? With all respect, you do make some silly arguments sometimes.

    No-one, as far as I know, is suggesting that we end free of movement with the EU. It's a bit hard to tell, because the Out side is so incoherent, but the suggestion seems to be that we either join the EEA, or negotiate a Swiss-style trade treaty. In both cases the position on immigration would be completely unchanged.

    I may be wrong about this - since the Out side has made zero effort to define what Out would look like, it's hard to say. But since they assure us that trade would be unaffected, one can only assume the obvious.
    Why don't you tell us what In would look like? Would you expect eventually to see Defence, Criminal Justice, Foreign or Immigration policy being determined by EU institutions? Would you consider such developments desirable? Would you expect to see the UK outvoted by the Eurozone? Is there any point at which you would think the process of political integration was damaging British interests?
    Why don't you answer his question?
Sign In or Register to comment.