It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
It probably isn’t an ambition school careers advisers have to deal with very often.
“Well, Jenkins. Have you given any thought to what you might like to do once you leave school?”
“Yes, sir. I’d like to be Fitzalan Pursuivant Extraordinary.”
“I’m sorry, Jenkins, I’m not sure I caught that.”
“Fitzalan Pursuivant Extraordinary, sir. It’s a job this bloke does at the Queen’s Speech, sir. I’m not quite sure what it is he does, but I really like his costume.”
“Hmm. Yes. I see. Jenkins, you know that I’m keen to encourage you, but openings in the field of Fitzalan Pursuivant Extraordinary are notoriously thin on the ground. What A-levels are you taking?”
“Geography, Metalwork and PE, sir.”
“Hmm. I see. I fear, Jenkins, that Fitzalan Pusuivant Extraordinary may not be the right path for you.”
“Oh, but sir! It’s my lifelong dream, sir!”
“Not to worry, Jenkins. Have you ever considered applying to be Master of the Horse, instead? Or Garter King of Arms? I hear there might be a vacancy coming up for Maltravers Herald Extraordinary.”
“Oh, sir! That’s not fair, sir! No one wants to be Maltravers Herald Extraordinary, sir!”
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
rather depends who you're talking about, doesn't it? The parliamentary party, some members of which enjoy spending time on yachts with peter mandelsonand selected russians. Alternatively, the rank and file, some of whom, if you could be bothered to find out, are probably quite decent
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
but this talk of "Christian clergy" suggests you're merely on a trolling mission anyway
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
CONCACAF is headquartered in Miami. Many of the meetings were held in the US. Many wire transfers went through the US banking system. Many of the sports marketing companies are US based.
You give Uncle Sam openings like that and it's over.
Apparently there have now been 6 guilty pleas.
The emphasis is that this is the beginning of the investigation.
It probably isn’t an ambition school careers advisers have to deal with very often.
“Well, Jenkins. Have you given any thought to what you might like to do once you leave school?”
“Yes, sir. I’d like to be Fitzalan Pursuivant Extraordinary.”
“I’m sorry, Jenkins, I’m not sure I caught that.”
“Fitzalan Pursuivant Extraordinary, sir. It’s a job this bloke does at the Queen’s Speech, sir. I’m not quite sure what it is he does, but I really like his costume.”
“Hmm. Yes. I see. Jenkins, you know that I’m keen to encourage you, but openings in the field of Fitzalan Pursuivant Extraordinary are notoriously thin on the ground. What A-levels are you taking?”
“Geography, Metalwork and PE, sir.”
“Hmm. I see. I fear, Jenkins, that Fitzalan Pusuivant Extraordinary may not be the right path for you.”
“Oh, but sir! It’s my lifelong dream, sir!”
“Not to worry, Jenkins. Have you ever considered applying to be Master of the Horse, instead? Or Garter King of Arms? I hear there might be a vacancy coming up for Maltravers Herald Extraordinary.”
“Oh, sir! That’s not fair, sir! No one wants to be Maltravers Herald Extraordinary, sir!”
We've had the AG, the US Attorney, the FBI chief, and now the IRS Chief of Criminal Investigation. This is going to be a big deal folks. Wouldn't be surprised to see Blatter - who said he would not stand for a 5th time - suddenly decide not to run 'for the good of the game'.
They are also talking about COMMMEBOL, whatever that is. They're nailing them too.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
I've never voted Tory, but it does not speak well of millions upon millions of people if you feel they have so little human decency that they would support the Tories, where decent clergy could not bring themselves to you say. Even if you believe those millions are dupes, it does not speak well of them.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
Tough. I am so, so bored of being snivelled at by self-righteous little numpties like you. The people have spoken, and they have spoken in favour of a small state, sound money, the end of welfare dependence, and recreational foxhunting. Get used to it, and save your whingeing for next year's Evisceration of the NHS (So Its Own Mother Wouldn't Recognise It) Bill.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
With people like the late Rev. Waddington (Dean of Manchester) and Welby's investigation of abuses by clergy then I think the church has enough to worry about putting its own house in order. Then there are the shameful episodes in the catholic church or the habits of some evangelicals in the US like the Westboro Baptists
Frankly, who wants to be associated with clergy? Count me out.
We've had the AG, the US Attorney, the FBI chief, and now the IRS Chief of Criminal Investigation. This is going to be a big deal folks. Wouldn't be surprised to see Blatter - who said he would not stand for a 5th time - suddenly decide not to run 'for the good of the game'.
They are also talking about COMMMEBOL, whatever that is. They're nailing them too.
maybe he can run for president of the Andorran FA- no extradition treaty with the US.. luvly jubly. soccer standard not so great, maybe difficult to travel. perhaps malidives a better bet..
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
I've never voted Tory, but it does not speak well of millions upon millions of people if you feel they have so little human decency that they would support the Tories, where decent clergy could not bring themselves to you say. Even if you believe those millions are dupes, it does not speak well of them.
Out of interest, who did you vote for this time in the end?!
Also, I agree that Yvette's chances are being underrated. As has been pointed out she apparently does have very good organisation, but also there's a feeling among some in the party (which I don't really agree with, as such) that "it's time for a woman leader", but with Kendall being beyond the pale for a lot of people saying that.
We've had the AG, the US Attorney, the FBI chief, and now the IRS Chief of Criminal Investigation. This is going to be a big deal folks. Wouldn't be surprised to see Blatter - who said he would not stand for a 5th time - suddenly decide not to run 'for the good of the game'.
They are also talking about COMMMEBOL, whatever that is. They're nailing them too.
maybe he can run for president of the Andorran FA- no extradition treaty with the US.. luvly jubly. soccer standard not so great, maybe difficult to travel. perhaps malidives a better bet..
Andorra would be good - I've been there and there is sweet FA there
We've had the AG, the US Attorney, the FBI chief, and now the IRS Chief of Criminal Investigation. This is going to be a big deal folks. Wouldn't be surprised to see Blatter - who said he would not stand for a 5th time - suddenly decide not to run 'for the good of the game'.
They are also talking about COMMMEBOL, whatever that is. They're nailing them too.
I think you mean CONMEBOL (South American football Confederation) - The others are CONCACAF for N America, UEFA for Europe, Russia etc, CAF for Africa and AFC for Asia.
We've had the AG, the US Attorney, the FBI chief, and now the IRS Chief of Criminal Investigation. This is going to be a big deal folks. Wouldn't be surprised to see Blatter - who said he would not stand for a 5th time - suddenly decide not to run 'for the good of the game'.
They are also talking about COMMMEBOL, whatever that is. They're nailing them too.
I think you mean CONMEBOL (South American football Confederation) - The others are CONCACAF for N America, UEFA for Europe, Russia etc, CAF for Africa and AFC for Asia.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
Given the pomp of the Cof E, and the Catholic Church in the UK and their association with child abuse, and their wealth which is in £billions , I would not wish to be approved of by them if I were a political party.
Their wealth alone is at complete variance with the teachings of Christ. As for the cover up of child abuse, iirc Christ had some unusually harsh words to say about such practices.
The member states of UEFA should demand a complete re-vote on the venues for the 2018 and 2022 World Cup tournaments, both of which they should boycott if refused.
The member states of UEFA should demand a complete re-vote on the venues for the 2018 and 2022 World Cup tournaments, both of which they should boycott if refused.
I doubt Russia as a member of UEFA would be up for that.
The member states of UEFA should demand a complete re-vote on the venues for the 2018 and 2022 World Cup tournaments, both of which they should boycott if refused.
Also, I agree that Yvette's chances are being underrated. As has been pointed out she apparently does have very good organisation, but also there's a feeling among some in the party (which I don't really agree with, as such) that "it's time for a woman leader", but with Kendall being beyond the pale for a lot of people saying that.
Wrong leader + wrong reason = right party in opposition. Keep it up. For myself I wonder at the judgement of someone who went out of his way to vote for Vincent Cable.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
Given the pomp of the Cof E, and the Catholic Church in the UK and their association with child abuse, and their wealth which is in £billions , I would not wish to be approved of by them if I were a political party.
Their wealth alone is at complete variance with the teachings of Christ. As for the cover up of child abuse, iirc Christ had some unusually harsh words to say about such practices.
Although nowhere near the scale of the Catholic church's problems, there have been child abuse scandals in the CoE as well.
Several folks saying that it's obvious there has been worldwide frustration with FIFA for many years, why did nobody else do anything before the US stepped up?
We've had the AG, the US Attorney, the FBI chief, and now the IRS Chief of Criminal Investigation. This is going to be a big deal folks. Wouldn't be surprised to see Blatter - who said he would not stand for a 5th time - suddenly decide not to run 'for the good of the game'.
They are also talking about COMMMEBOL, whatever that is. They're nailing them too.
CONMEBOL is the South American soccer federation (equivalent of UEFA in Europe).
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
Given the pomp of the Cof E, and the Catholic Church in the UK and their association with child abuse, and their wealth which is in £billions , I would not wish to be approved of by them if I were a political party.
Their wealth alone is at complete variance with the teachings of Christ. As for the cover up of child abuse, iirc Christ had some unusually harsh words to say about such practices.
The wealth of the C of E is used to pay pretty modest (in relation to their level of qualification) salaries and pensions to clergy, to pay for the upkeep of churches, and to provide social services. All of these things inevitably cost money.
While there have been cases of clerical child abuse in the UK, to be honest, the worst examples of abuse (eg childrens' homes, or Rotherham) have come from outside the churches.
Nothing specific on boundary changes in the Queens Speech.
However there is a Votes for Life Bill - see link - page 96.
That could potentially be used to put in clauses for:
- going back to 650 MPs - automatic implementation of reviews in 2018 (ie no Parliamentary votes required).
If no changes to legislation the review kicks off automatically in early 2016 based on 2015 electorates with 600 MPs - reports to be issued by 1 October 2018, must then be approved by Commons + Lords.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
Yes, I'm sure the USA could be persuaded to take on that burden if Russia were ruled out of 2018.
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
Yes, I'm sure the USA could be persuaded to take on that burden if Russia were ruled out of 2018.
I was thinking more in terms of France, Germany, South Africa or Brazil. They've all hosted more recently than the USA.
They would all (except Brazil) avoid the time zone problem.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
Nothing specific on boundary changes in the Queens Speech.
That's surprising. You would think that the time to change the law to make the boundary changes automatic would be at the start of the Parliament. Perhaps they will bundle that up with the vote on approving the new set of boundaries in 2018, precisely so that they can avoid amendments to put the numbers of MPs back up to 650.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
You may be right - certainly there would need to be compensation paid for work already done to host the event, in the case of moving it.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
The Swiss have also opened a separate investigation into the bidding process for the World Cup tournaments in 2018 in Russia and 2022 in Qatar. - If the outcome is lees than sub-optimal for FIFA, who knows what may happen to these fixtures.
Nothing specific on boundary changes in the Queens Speech.
That's surprising. You would think that the time to change the law to make the boundary changes automatic would be at the start of the Parliament. Perhaps they will bundle that up with the vote on approving the new set of boundaries in 2018, precisely so that they can avoid amendments to put the numbers of MPs back up to 650.
But by waiting Cameron risks losing the vote in 2018 - by when his majority will probably be smaller.
There is also the issue that the Parliament Act doesn't apply to Statutory Instruments (which is the implementation mechanism) - so if the Lords vote the Statutory Instrument down in 2018 it can't be forced through (not sure whether can be sent back a 2nd time).
Bottom line is that it's very risky leaving it to the votes in 2018. Much safer to get it into law now that the PM lays the reports directly to the Queen without need for Parliamentary vote.
I have a feeling they are going to stick a clause in the Votes for Life Bill.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
You may be right - certainly there would need to be compensation paid for work already done to host the event, in the case of moving it.
The FIFA organisation itself might not survive all of this.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
I've never voted Tory, but it does not speak well of millions upon millions of people if you feel they have so little human decency that they would support the Tories, where decent clergy could not bring themselves to you say. Even if you believe those millions are dupes, it does not speak well of them.
Out of interest, who did you vote for this time in the end?!
I ended up voting LD again, without much enthusiasm admittedly. I didn't fear a Labour win but was not enthused about the prospect, and despite some major failings I went the Indy route and figured a return to the Coalition would be the best outcome, plus I felt sorry for the LDs. The Greens I considered on the basis of wishing as many parties as possible to do well, but I didn't even get a leaflet from them so I didn't feel they deserved my vote. UKIP didn't need my vote to do well in national vote share either.
I felt reasonably ok with Cameron the 'comfortable in coalition' type leader, so I do wonder how I will feel with him now free of those shackles and in the shackles placed by his backbenchers.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
The Swiss have also opened a separate investigation into the bidding process for the World Cup tournaments in 2018 in Russia and 2022 in Qatar. - If the outcome is lees than sub-optimal for FIFA, who knows what may happen to these fixtures.
They may be leading it, but you know there will be heavy DOJ involvement.
As AG Loretta Lynch said this morning - The indictment alleges corruption that is rampant, systemic, and deep-rooted both abroad and here in the United States.
Several folks saying that it's obvious there has been worldwide frustration with FIFA for many years, why did nobody else do anything before the US stepped up?
For some reason Fifa is too powerful for national governments it seems.
@PickardJE: Union official says the Tories have "started a bloody war".
"When we’re next in power we will make Tory donors jump through 100 hoops."
Umm, when exactly do the unions think they might be in power, ever?
Did they explain what is intrinsically wrong in asking people to make a positive decision to contribute financially to a union political fund rather than it being automatic?
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
You may be right - certainly there would need to be compensation paid for work already done to host the event, in the case of moving it.
The FIFA organisation itself might not survive all of this.
You might think that - I couldn't possibly comment
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
The Swiss have also opened a separate investigation into the bidding process for the World Cup tournaments in 2018 in Russia and 2022 in Qatar. - If the outcome is lees than sub-optimal for FIFA, who knows what may happen to these fixtures.
If it can be proven that the tournament was won by bribes, then I would think that no compensation would be due to the perpetrators.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
The Swiss have also opened a separate investigation into the bidding process for the World Cup tournaments in 2018 in Russia and 2022 in Qatar. - If the outcome is lees than sub-optimal for FIFA, who knows what may happen to these fixtures.
"Too difficult to move" "Unfair on sponsors and other stakeholders who have already invested in these locations" "Actions of a few should not derail a process which was otherwise spotless" "These actions were unfortunate but it would not have changed the outcome" "We'll make sure it's all hunky-dory ... next time" "Putin has threatened to invade Switzerland if we cancel it"
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
You may be right - certainly there would need to be compensation paid for work already done to host the event, in the case of moving it.
The FIFA organisation itself might not survive all of this.
Scrapping FIFA may be the only way to fix the problem. It would be a fitting end to Sepp Blatters career.
probably it takes a country with an aggressive legal system which doesn't care that much if the world cup is cancelled?
(in reply to Tim_B)
Surely it wouldn't need to be canceled - any one of the last few host countries could step up with a few months notice, as they already have the infrastructure in place.
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
There's simply too much money at stake to see either the 2018 or 2022 World Cups cancelled or moved. A cynical view perhaps, but one I'd stake money on.
The Swiss have also opened a separate investigation into the bidding process for the World Cup tournaments in 2018 in Russia and 2022 in Qatar. - If the outcome is lees than sub-optimal for FIFA, who knows what may happen to these fixtures.
"Too difficult to move" "Unfair on sponsors and other stakeholders who have already invested in these locations" "Actions of a few should not derail a process which was otherwise spotless" "These actions were unfortunate but it would not have changed the outcome" "We'll make sure it's all hunky-dory ... next time" "Putin has threatened to invade Switzerland if we cancel it"
Brilliant. You should win a prize if one statement ends up containing all of those at once, which wouldn't surprise me (except for the latter obviously, as we know any anti-Putin comments are hypocritical comments from those deluded by the Western MSM)
9 FIFA officials and 5 corporate executives indicted in federal court in Brooklyn on racketeering conspiracy and corruption charges. Defendants include 2 current FIFA vice presidents, and current and former presidents of CONCACAF. They are accused of accepting bribes and kick-backs between the early 1990s and now.
Even ESPN is covering the DOJ press conference at 10.30 ET
What is fascinating is what will happen when the the Swiss arrested folks arrive here. The pressure will be on the higher up indictees to cop a plea and sacrifice Blatter to the Feds.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
I've never voted Tory, but it does not speak well of millions upon millions of people if you feel they have so little human decency that they would support the Tories, where decent clergy could not bring themselves to you say. Even if you believe those millions are dupes, it does not speak well of them.
It would be a moment of great joy to see the corrupt, arrogant, bloated carcass of Fifa and its officials who are an embodiment of that carcass, to be torn into and its secrets exposed.
Despite assurances this is not over, I fear I may be disappointed and this is about as good as it gets.
It is little wonder that so few Christian clergymen wish to be associated with the modern Conservative Party. The latter adheres to a code of ethics totally at variance with their basic principles and their sense of human decency.
Tough. I am so, so bored of being snivelled at by self-righteous little numpties like you. The people have spoken, and they have spoken in favour of a small state, sound money, the end of welfare dependence, and recreational foxhunting. Get used to it, and save your whingeing for next year's Evisceration of the NHS (So Its Own Mother Wouldn't Recognise It) Bill.
David Mundell was asked in a Yes/No fashion if he knew anything about Memogate.
His answer was neither Yes or No.
He was then re-asked the question.
He then repeated his waffle (which was that the leak inquiry purely fingered Carmichael and Carmichael's SPAD and no one else).
He never denied that he knew. So either he knew and he didn't want to lie or he didn't know and the politician's reflex kicked in which makes them patohlogically unable to answer Yes/No questions with Yes/No.
Comments
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/blog/live/2015/may/27/queens-speech-2015-politics-live
Also US banks were used to make the alleged illegal payments, according to radio reports I heard this morning.
Far too much wooly thinking by the Earl of Cardigan during the Charge of the Light Brigade/at the Battle of Balaclava.
You give Uncle Sam openings like that and it's over.
Apparently there have now been 6 guilty pleas.
The emphasis is that this is the beginning of the investigation.
in Blackadder there was a witch smeller pursuivant
The fact the election is going ahead with this happening is quite simply astounding.
I, for one, am a committed Christian and Tory.
They are also talking about COMMMEBOL, whatever that is. They're nailing them too.
He slapped down the entire SNP cohort for applauding in the House. And quite right too.
Let's hope they start to respect the House a little more.
The IRS confirming that they have no sense of humour.
The church will be finished within a generation in the Uk.
They really do think they are in nursery school
Answer - the investigation is ongoing, and cannot comment on Mr Blatter.
Further comment that they are seeking further defendants not yet in custody.
Frankly, who wants to be associated with clergy? Count me out.
answer - tend to act when the evidence comes together, so cannot control that.
talking heads - getting them when they are all in Switzerland makes extradition much easier than from some of their home countries.
The ESPN feed is much better than the others.
Some questions are unbelievably dumb - why did it take this long to get to this point?
Their wealth alone is at complete variance with the teachings of Christ.
As for the cover up of child abuse, iirc Christ had some unusually harsh words to say about such practices.
Keep it up. For myself I wonder at the judgement of someone who went out of his way to vote for Vincent Cable.
http://news.sky.com/story/1112679/church-of-englands-apology-over-sex-abuse
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CONMEBOL
(in reply to Tim_B)
While there have been cases of clerical child abuse in the UK, to be honest, the worst examples of abuse (eg childrens' homes, or Rotherham) have come from outside the churches.
However there is a Votes for Life Bill - see link - page 96.
That could potentially be used to put in clauses for:
- going back to 650 MPs
- automatic implementation of reviews in 2018 (ie no Parliamentary votes required).
If no changes to legislation the review kicks off automatically in early 2016 based on 2015 electorates with 600 MPs - reports to be issued by 1 October 2018, must then be approved by Commons + Lords.
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/430149/QS_lobby_pack_FINAL_NEW_2.pdf
All it takes is a FIFA vote (plus presumably the usual bribes and kickbacks).
They would all (except Brazil) avoid the time zone problem.
There is also the issue that the Parliament Act doesn't apply to Statutory Instruments (which is the implementation mechanism) - so if the Lords vote the Statutory Instrument down in 2018 it can't be forced through (not sure whether can be sent back a 2nd time).
Bottom line is that it's very risky leaving it to the votes in 2018. Much safer to get it into law now that the PM lays the reports directly to the Queen without need for Parliamentary vote.
I have a feeling they are going to stick a clause in the Votes for Life Bill.
"When we’re next in power we will make Tory donors jump through 100 hoops."
Umm, when exactly do the unions think they might be in power, ever?
I felt reasonably ok with Cameron the 'comfortable in coalition' type leader, so I do wonder how I will feel with him now free of those shackles and in the shackles placed by his backbenchers.
As AG Loretta Lynch said this morning - The indictment alleges corruption that is rampant, systemic, and deep-rooted both abroad and here in the United States.
The Swiss will not be alone.
"Unfair on sponsors and other stakeholders who have already invested in these locations"
"Actions of a few should not derail a process which was otherwise spotless"
"These actions were unfortunate but it would not have changed the outcome"
"We'll make sure it's all hunky-dory ... next time"
"Putin has threatened to invade Switzerland if we cancel it"
Despite assurances this is not over, I fear I may be disappointed and this is about as good as it gets.
Godwin again!
His answer was neither Yes or No.
He was then re-asked the question.
He then repeated his waffle (which was that the leak inquiry purely fingered Carmichael and Carmichael's SPAD and no one else).
He never denied that he knew. So either he knew and he didn't want to lie or he didn't know and the politician's reflex kicked in which makes them patohlogically unable to answer Yes/No questions with Yes/No.