politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Local By-Election Preview : January 29th 2015
politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Local By-Election Preview : January 29th 2015
Marshalwick South on St. Albans (Two Conservative defences)
Result of council at last election (2014): Conservatives 29, Liberal Democrats 17, Labour 10, Greens 1, Independent 1 (No Overall Control, Conservatives and Opposition tied)
0
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
Sorry, TSE.
But hell, let's go with the story of the year so far, the Green 'surge' and completely against their trend in locals (so I'm told) let's predict a Green win here.
Survivors of child sex abuse have received death threats after their personal details and confidential communications with an abuse inquiry were published online.
Home Secretary Theresa May has written to Mr Vaz describing her "dismay" at the Committee's publishing of the documents.
http://news.sky.com/story/1417450/death-threats-after-files-published-online
!!
It is bad form to be first on a thread that you publish.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11376427/Ed-Miliband-has-sold-Labours-soul-for-3.5p.html
Err !?
Can YouGov regain their Gold Standard Status?
I promise to give up being first between now and the General Election.
Casino said:
"I expect either a Conservative minority, with Lib Dem abstentions on confidence and supply matters, or a much weaker time-limited coalition deal with the Lib-Dems to end 2017.
That'd be predicated on a few big constitutional reforms (e.g. PR for local elections sans referendum, in exchange for EU referendum) and a couple of joint budgets."
So if the Tories were to win the most seats, your money would be on Tim Farron (or alternative new leftie LibDem leader) getting into bed in some guise or other with the Tories - the very best of luck with that hypothesis! I say absolutely no chance .... do you fancy a bet, it's been a while since we last crossed swords, nothing too big, maybe a score if you fancy it.
*****
Peter, I hope we've never crossed swords, but let me be clear about what I'm predicting: first, Tories to be ahead on seats. Second, I think they'll clock up between 285 and 305 seats. If pushed, I reckon the mid 290s. Third, the government to result to either be a Conservative minority, Conservative minority with Lib Dem confidence and supply or a 2nd Con-Lib Dem coalition. In that order.
I don't 'expect' a 2nd Con-Lib Dem coalition. My money is actually on Conservative minority! But I do think it's possible. The two parties have been preparing the ground for it:
http://www.spectator.co.uk/columnists/politics/9337311/why-are-the-lib-dems-duffing-up-the-tories-to-ensure-another-coalition/
http://labourlist.org/2014/07/lib-dems-ready-for-new-coalition-with-the-tories-even-if-labour-wins-more-seats/
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/liberal-democrat-conference-party-begins-to-soften-its-stance-on-fresh-coalition-with-tories-9778459.html
I thinking you're assuming the Lib Dems will ditch Clegg. But, so low are expectations that if Clegg does retain 30 seats and a decent vote percentage (say, beats UKIP) plus a Con-Lib Dem 2nd coalition is the only option that provides (even a wafer thin) overall parliamentary majority, then he will stay and a 2nd coalition could result.
If you really want to bet on this, I'm happy to be generous to you and offer you £20 at 4/1 (which is better than Betfair). If you win, I pay you £20. If I win (which I don't expect to) you pay me £80. Bet to be settled on the first ministry to be formed after the election.
If you believe there's absolutely no chance, then you're getting a great deal!
Yeah, we're all getting worried about that one.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/general-election-2015/11376427/Ed-Miliband-has-sold-Labours-soul-for-3.5p.html
Hospitals that provide 75% of all NHS services refuse to sign deal, saying £1.7bn cuts involved will put patient care at risk
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/jan/29/englands-biggest-hospitals-refuse-nhs-budget-patient-safety-fears
Is there an election coming or something?
2. If Cameron stays in Downing St we'll have a referendum on the EU which means Dan can turn his fire on Farage/UKIP'ers.
Farage 4/1/15 "If people don't speak English and they are dealing with English-speaking patients surely they shouldn't be employed in the first place."
Labour 26/1/15 "Labour will make sure that all frontline public sector staff can speak English".
That's hypocrisy.
But I suspect even in the event Labour do not win, as I expect, the LDs would not want another formal coalition even if they were willing to prop the Tories up again. Your assessment is rather dependent on the idea that people who make certain predictions, often with a complete lack of self awareness and with staggering amounts of arrogance and bile for those that disagree (I don't think Dan is all that bad in that respect, but he has been very certain at least) which end up being very very wrong, will through embarrassment or professional pride not be willing to immediately leap to some other position with the same intensity with barely an acknowledgement of how wrong they were. That seems optimistic to me.
When Ed wins Dan can just lament that he overestimated the British public and switch to criticising all the government's actions, he will still find a ready audience at the Telegraph for that. If Ed loses somehow, he can make hay about how right he was and push for Labour to return to the sorts of ideals he espouses from a position of relative strength. Sure it's not as marketable to a specific base as his current anti-Ed niche is, but it's viable.
We have public sector frontline staff that can't currently speak English ?!
Let the poor immigrants work all the hours God sends for starvation wages while our fat lazy slobs watch Jezza on a flat screen paid for by us
Thanks for your reply, I don't know why but I feel really tired tonight, actually I do know why ..... only 4 hours sleep last night did for me. So forgive me if I don't reply until the morning. It would be fun to have a punt on the GE with you, although this may not be ideal I'll let you know asap, but thanks anyway for your claimed generosity.
....... zzzzzzzz
http://news.sky.com/story/1416946/rotherham-victim-says-abusers-untouchable
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-bristol-31051171
Whore - so much for Je suis Charlie.
May be worth a try for Ed..
Are you sure it isn't that terrible four-letter swear word: Tory ?
So on the witness stand the witness said
"I saw the dependant, repeatedly kick and punch the victim several time, then as he walked away, he said to the victim "You deserved that you effing c*nt"
The judge then said, "I think you censored the wrong swear word there"
Germany succumbs to Europe’s deflationary crisis
The euro area's economic titan has joined the rest of the currency bloc, and has entered deflation in January, for the first time since October 2009
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/finance/economics/11376346/Germany-succumbs-to-Europes-deflationary-crisis.html
Judge "Before I pass sentence, do you have anything to say for yourself"
Defendant: "Fuck All"
Judge (to lawyer) "What did he say?!"
Lawyer "He said 'fuck all' your honour"
Judge "He said something, I saw his lips move!"
"some sheep, some pigs and some fuckers."
"fuckers, boy?"
"yes, dad. Farmer called them 'eifers, but I knew what he meant".
You shouldn't equate not wishing to see pb.com hijacked day after day about this topic, with disinterest in, or complicity towards, the topic itself.
Actually, why am I even bothering?
Night.
YOUNG British jihadis are losers who watch too much porn because they can’t pull women, an MI5 probe has found.
Tory Boris Johnson reveals our spy bosses’ blunt assessment in an exclusive interview today — and calls for the demystifying of UK extremists who join Islamic State.
The London Mayor, who was handed the probe’s findings by security officials, said: “If you look at all the psychological profiling about bombers, they typically will look at porn. They are literally w***ers. Severe onanists.
http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/politics/6308931/Boris-Johnson-Jihadists-are-just-a-bunch-of-ws.html?CMP=spklr-137372003-Editorial-TWITTER-Sun_Politics-20150129-Politics
And we think we should prioritise free trade with them over the rest of the world. I know I bang on about the same few things a lot but (a) they are important issues and (b) I'm right about them.
Isabel Hardman retweeted
BBC This Week@bbcthisweek·5 mins5 minutes ago
With no Diane tonight, there's a new goddess on #bbctw as @IsabelHardman will round up the headlines
The tweet appears to show her in a toga holding some round objects.
@PCollinsTimes: The Labour election campaign on health is already more about the definition of defeat than the likelihood of victory.
Where do labour go now then? Health was it; the one card they thought they could play...
Lab MP squirming
I think 34-34 is better for Con than 33-33.
Both are a tie but it means a stronger position vs LD (and UKIP).
Plus it indicates momentum in sense of people returning to Con.
But its also amusing to read that the co editor of Guido Fawkes, went to Tonbridge School before reading politics at Edinburgh and has never had a 'proper job' in his still juvenile life. Remind me just what is the big hate for the the anti establishment figures that love Guido?
Ex-Cameron aide Patrick Rock faces trial over child abuse images http://gu.com/p/3qkvv/stw
The trial is next month I think?
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/
Don't think that would hold for another week like this week, though.
http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/yougov-voting-intention
Two complete wan**rs
https://twitter.com/GabrielScally/status/560422310944178176/photo/1
Just what I want to see three months before the election.
What makes it even funnier, it is on Labour's favoured turf, the NHS,
Keep up the good work.
@politicshome: Culture Secretary @sajidjavid on #bbcqt "If people outside want to know what would happen to the NHS if Labour ran it... look here [Wales]"
"It's protectionist, it's going to protect the inefficient. It's going to protect the incompetence, it's going to protect the low quality service," he said.
Well, quite. Only the most ideologically obsessed, or those conflicted because they are themselves part of the vested interests being thus protected, could possibly disagree with that.
Flightpath Good to see a fellow OT conquering the heights of ISIS
Jihadists watching porn surely marks them as typical of most young men, however as ISIS have flogged a man for watching it in Syria probably best to stay in their rooms than join Jihad
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/isis-militants-flog-man-watching-porn-syria-1481407
So in 2015 Farage says immigrants should/must learn to speak English?
But back in May 2014 (ie last year) it was widely reported that Tory Culture Secretary Sajid Javid said Migrants to Britain should be able to speak English and ‘respect its laws and culture’. He said it was not good enough for migrants to live in the UK for up to 50 years without being able to speak English.
And its this current government which has introduced English language tests for non-EU citizens who want to settle in the UK. Its this governments Tory PM who said way back in Jan 2014 that benefits should be cut if claimants could not speak English and that the translation of leaflets into multiple languages would stop. Typically the LDs did not like the idea. Indeed when Cameron made his speech criticising the lefty policy of multiculturalism he said then that immigrants should integrate and learn English.
Trolling Law must be a worry for you