Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » PB Nighthawks is now open

SystemSystem Posts: 12,182
edited May 2013 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » PB Nighthawks is now open

A great philosopher once wrote, Drop in, relax, and converse into the night on the day’s events in PB Night Hawks.

Read the full story here


«1

Comments

  • @TSEeezers good!
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited May 2013
    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    tim said:

    The contorted Ibiza fop has been told to hide his sunglasses .

    @GuidoFawkes: Sunburnt Dave Poses With Fans on Beach http://t.co/aERYs33K7Q

    Why would that matter either way?
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,613
    Poor old Alan Sked. He really is going for the Ted Heath award for the longest sulk in political history.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    Tim Farron will ... fill in the blank with whatever panders best to the Lib Dem base?

    Is this some new kind of Blankety-Blank game to play?
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    If Yukel is around, does he think the rebels will survive until the end of the year ? Or, will they collapse long before that ? The infighting shown in the video from the SNC meeting in Istanbul does not augur well.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited May 2013

    Poor old Alan Sked. He really is going for the Ted Heath award for the longest sulk in political history.

    Like Bruce Rioch digging Wenger out for finishing 4th

    Edit: maybe not as Rioch wasn't the founder of Arsenals success. More like Georgie Graham digging out the 1998 team for conceding too many goals
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    tim said:

    The contorted Ibiza fop has been told to hide his sunglasses .

    @GuidoFawkes: Sunburnt Dave Poses With Fans on Beach http://t.co/aERYs33K7Q

    I do admire the easy and unforced manner with which Dave mixes with ordinary holidaymakers.

    He is a real man of the people.

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768
    Charles said:

    Tim Farron will ... fill in the blank with whatever panders best to the Lib Dem base?

    Is this some new kind of Blankety-Blank game to play?

    Oops, I've amended it now.
  • surbitonsurbiton Posts: 13,549
    isam said:

    Poor old Alan Sked. He really is going for the Ted Heath award for the longest sulk in political history.

    Like Bruce Rioch digging Wenger out for finishing 4th
    I hope UKIP gets 8 - 11% at the GE, but I think it will be around 6%. For once Cameron was right. They are a bunch of racists and fruitcakes.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,543
    LibDems announce Tim Farron will what, TSE? Defect to UKIP? Elope with Prince William in a bigamous gay marriage? Curl up with a nice book?
  • stodgestodge Posts: 13,927



    I think your analysis is basically sound Stodge. The only point I disagree with you on is the position of the Tory party as far as what they will actually be able to achieve and so what they will present to the public.

    I do not believe that Cameron will be able to wrestle any significant concessions from the EU at any point in the foreseeable future. Certainly not by 2017. Furthermore I believe that he already knows this and that his whole strategy is to obtain some very minor, easily reversible and ultimately meaningless concession which he will then go to the country with and use as the basis for recommending we stay in the EU. He will have the backing of both the Lib Dems and Labour on this as they remain deeply Europhile.

    If he does manage to con the country he will then be able to put aside (he would hope) the issue of an EU referendum for a generation.

    Of course if he does do this he will be out as PM within a year as his own party will crucify him.

    In the end Cameron has no intention of having us leave the EU under any circumstances. It is this first and foremost which guides all his thinking on the matter.

    First, thanks for taking the trouble to respond last night, Richard. From your UKIP colleagues Nigel and Mike, I got nothing in terms of a coherent response - more along the lines of "I don't believe any of them, vote UKIP" which didn't exactly raise the standard of the debate.

    If you are right, then Cameron's problems will begin long before he puts any renegotiated membership package to the electorate. The first (and probably most significant) hurdle any new package will have to clear is the Conservative Party. If Cameron cannot sell it to them he won't be able to sell it to the electorate who will then watch either the Conservatives tear themselves to pieces or oust Cameron in an internal putsch.

    I think you are right in that Cameron probably wants us to stay in and I have always believed the Americans have made it clear to every British Prime Minister the consequences of a unilateral withdrawal will be severe. The ploy must therefore either be a) never to put the question of Britain's membership to the electorate or b) only put the question if a positive result is certain or can be guaranteed.

    The same of course applies to a future Labour Government. Ed Miliband will only ask the question if he can be certain of the answer so there would need to be a sustained campaign to persuade a sceptical electorate of the benefits of continued membership (or the disbenefits of withdrawal).
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768

    LibDems announce Tim Farron will what, TSE? Defect to UKIP? Elope with Prince William in a bigamous gay marriage? Curl up with a nice book?

    As Charles says, it is PB's version of Blankety Blank.

    I've amended the link now
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals

  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,012
    tim said:

    John Rentoul ‏@JohnRentoul
    Interesting ComRes poll for the @Independent coming up at 2200hrs tonight.

    crossover/parity with the Kippers?

    Some contorted third derivative post-Woolwich reaction?

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768
    Shakes fist at ComRes.

    You've wasted far too much of my time today trying to decipher your open Europe poll now you're publishing a phone poll without sending me the embargoed poll.

    Grrr
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    surbiton said:

    isam said:

    Poor old Alan Sked. He really is going for the Ted Heath award for the longest sulk in political history.

    Like Bruce Rioch digging Wenger out for finishing 4th
    I hope UKIP gets 8 - 11% at the GE, but I think it will be around 6%. For once Cameron was right. They are a bunch of racists and fruitcakes.
    I have never been to a political meeting before, but am going to a UKIP one on June 11th. I will report back honestly as to the kind of people that were there.

  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    TOPPING said:

    tim said:

    John Rentoul ‏@JohnRentoul
    Interesting ComRes poll for the @Independent coming up at 2200hrs tonight.

    crossover/parity with the Kippers?

    Some contorted third derivative post-Woolwich reaction?

    Nah, that would be "extraordinary", "dramatic", "stunning", "shocking".

    This is "interesting".

    Suggests Tories doing better, UKIP falling a little, Labour lead collapsing

    Alternatively perhaps a straight UKIP to LibDem switch?
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    Even if UKIP only get 6% that would be a doubling of their 2010 support and would probably be enough to stop Cameron getting a majority. And I think they will get at least 6%.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,012
    Charles said:

    TOPPING said:

    tim said:

    John Rentoul ‏@JohnRentoul
    Interesting ComRes poll for the @Independent coming up at 2200hrs tonight.

    crossover/parity with the Kippers?

    Some contorted third derivative post-Woolwich reaction?

    Nah, that would be "extraordinary", "dramatic", "stunning", "shocking".

    This is "interesting".

    Suggests Tories doing better, UKIP falling a little, Labour lead collapsing

    Alternatively perhaps a straight UKIP to LibDem switch?
    Rentoul no master of the understatement?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited May 2013
    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,613
    surbiton said:

    isam said:

    Poor old Alan Sked. He really is going for the Ted Heath award for the longest sulk in political history.

    Like Bruce Rioch digging Wenger out for finishing 4th
    I hope UKIP gets 8 - 11% at the GE, but I think it will be around 6%. For once Cameron was right. They are a bunch of racists and fruitcakes.
    Oh really Surbiton? Any actual evidence for that beyond your own obvious blind bigotry?
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,012
    isam said:

    surbiton said:

    isam said:

    Poor old Alan Sked. He really is going for the Ted Heath award for the longest sulk in political history.

    Like Bruce Rioch digging Wenger out for finishing 4th
    I hope UKIP gets 8 - 11% at the GE, but I think it will be around 6%. For once Cameron was right. They are a bunch of racists and fruitcakes.
    I have never been to a political meeting before, but am going to a UKIP one on June 11th. I will report back honestly as to the kind of people that were there.

    Sam never forget that you are a PB Chimaera. You are a Lab => UKIP switcher. For many on here of a leftist persuasion that simply doesn't add up. If they think about it for too long their head explodes.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    TOPPING said:

    Charles said:

    TOPPING said:

    tim said:

    John Rentoul ‏@JohnRentoul
    Interesting ComRes poll for the @Independent coming up at 2200hrs tonight.

    crossover/parity with the Kippers?

    Some contorted third derivative post-Woolwich reaction?

    Nah, that would be "extraordinary", "dramatic", "stunning", "shocking".

    This is "interesting".

    Suggests Tories doing better, UKIP falling a little, Labour lead collapsing

    Alternatively perhaps a straight UKIP to LibDem switch?
    Rentoul no master of the understatement?
    Even if he was, it would have leaked out from some other source if it was crossover.

    I supose it could also have been a Survation style result confirmed by a different pollster? But again doesn't feel "interesting". That sounds to me like "It's all over, folks!"
  • Richard_TyndallRichard_Tyndall Posts: 32,613
    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    The point being Tim that although in theory the EIHC is supposed to give people free access to health care within the EU and EFTA, in practice many places quietly ignore it and demand either proof of insurance or money up front.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758
    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

    Don't know the specific rules, but I believe the general principle is that EU citizens should get the same treatment as local citizens.

    That's why we get anomolies such as Scottish and EU students getting funded at Scottish universities but not English students at Scottish universities.
  • TOPPINGTOPPING Posts: 43,012
    Charles said:

    TOPPING said:

    Charles said:

    TOPPING said:

    tim said:

    John Rentoul ‏@JohnRentoul
    Interesting ComRes poll for the @Independent coming up at 2200hrs tonight.

    crossover/parity with the Kippers?

    Some contorted third derivative post-Woolwich reaction?

    Nah, that would be "extraordinary", "dramatic", "stunning", "shocking".

    This is "interesting".

    Suggests Tories doing better, UKIP falling a little, Labour lead collapsing

    Alternatively perhaps a straight UKIP to LibDem switch?
    Rentoul no master of the understatement?
    Even if he was, it would have leaked out from some other source if it was crossover.

    I supose it could also have been a Survation style result confirmed by a different pollster? But again doesn't feel "interesting". That sounds to me like "It's all over, folks!"
    I suppose so but UKIP @ 20% is still pretty much of a head ****. After that the odd few percentage points is all so much noise.

    I still don't expect it to last but it makes the whole thing more interesting especially with so many polls giving seemingly bonkers results.
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Apropos of nothing in particular, was John Reith considered to be gay?

    Seriously now - and I can't be bothered to scour the internet for sordid conjecture - does anybody know?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited May 2013
    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    The EC's spokesman for employment, social affairs and inclusion, Jonathan Todd, told the ITIJ: 'The Commission is aware that there are some problems in Spain as regards the alleged refusal of some hospitals to recognise the EHIC.

    'Spanish public hospitals – and hospitals concertados – have to accept the EHIC. The Commission is currently in discussions with the Spanish authorities in order to resolve these problems.'

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/travel/article-2275144/EHIC-Spain-Report-highlights-claims-Spanish-hospitals-wont-accept-card-treatment.html

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/holidays/article-2320851/Getting-hospital-treatment-holiday.html?ito=newsletter

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/holidays/article-2307958/Travel-insurance-illness--EHIC-covers.html


    Cant find where they got those figs though... where do you think?

  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    I think I have a crush on the Chrome Ninja I just spoke to on the phone.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768
    edited May 2013
    Fenster said:

    Apropos of nothing in particular, was John Reith considered to be gay?

    Seriously now - and I can't be bothered to scour the internet for sordid conjecture - does anybody know?

    There was a documentary a few years ago, that said he was very unhappy in his marriage.

    That he had to be married for the sake of his parents and his career, but in his youth, he often shared a bed with a guy, and swam naked with other guys.

    There's no proof one way or the other, but he was in an era where homosexuality was a crime.
  • isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

    @isam Try this.....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10022601/NHS-counts-900-million-cost-of-treating-EU-visitors.html
  • isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

    @isam Try this.....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10022601/NHS-counts-900-million-cost-of-treating-EU-visitors.html
    Or this

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/holidays/article-2320851/Getting-hospital-treatment-holiday.html
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115

    Fenster said:

    Apropos of nothing in particular, was John Reith considered to be gay?

    Seriously now - and I can't be bothered to scour the internet for sordid conjecture - does anybody know?

    There was a documentary a few years ago, that said he was very unhappy in his marriage.

    That he had to be married for the sake of his parents and his career, but in his youth, he often shared a bed with a guy, and swam naked with other guys.

    There's no proof one way or the other, but he was in an era where homosexuality was a crime.
    Thank you. I read about him chasing a young and "pretty" young man around the country, writing romantic letters to him and sharing cottage beds in remote parts of Scotland with him and hated to start thinking something I shouldn't!

    After all, how do you square the possibility of homosexuality with his austere, strictly conservative, God-fearing public persona?

    I hadn't realised he was married. I thought he was a lifelong bachelor. You live and learn.

  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053
    isam said:

    surbiton said:

    isam said:

    Poor old Alan Sked. He really is going for the Ted Heath award for the longest sulk in political history.

    Like Bruce Rioch digging Wenger out for finishing 4th
    I hope UKIP gets 8 - 11% at the GE, but I think it will be around 6%. For once Cameron was right. They are a bunch of racists and fruitcakes.
    I have never been to a political meeting before, but am going to a UKIP one on June 11th. I will report back honestly as to the kind of people that were there.

    Good Evening all.
    Hi isam, the big meeting (conference really) is at Frimley Green on June 8th. Its a ticketed event, be prepared to fork out £20 if you want to go. I'm still thinking about it,'cause I got no wheels and its a bit of a journey without one.
  • From the Telegraph article previously linked.

    EU migrants who work in the UK are classified as being resident here and qualify for free NHS health care, meaning that if they travel back to their homeland for health care they are considered UK citizens and the bill is sent back here to be picked up by the NHS.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768
    edited May 2013
    Fenster said:

    Fenster said:

    Apropos of nothing in particular, was John Reith considered to be gay?

    Seriously now - and I can't be bothered to scour the internet for sordid conjecture - does anybody know?

    There was a documentary a few years ago, that said he was very unhappy in his marriage.

    That he had to be married for the sake of his parents and his career, but in his youth, he often shared a bed with a guy, and swam naked with other guys.

    There's no proof one way or the other, but he was in an era where homosexuality was a crime.
    Thank you. I read about him chasing a young and "pretty" young man around the country, writing romantic letters to him and sharing cottage beds in remote parts of Scotland with him and hated to start thinking something I shouldn't!

    After all, how do you square the possibility of homosexuality with his austere, strictly conservative, God-fearing public persona?

    I hadn't realised he was married. I thought he was a lifelong bachelor. You live and learn.

    He had a daughter from his marriage, he had a very difficult relationship with her.

    I think he resented he had to hide himself from the world.

    Have you not noticed some of the biggest God Fearing people are secretly homosexual?

    These links should help re Lord Reith

    http://www.standard.co.uk/news/john-reith-the-puritanical-founder-of-the-bbc-7175763.html

    and

    http://www.bbc.co.uk/historyofthebbc/resources/in-depth/reith_3.shtml
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,543
    TSE - thanks for completing the suspenseful Farron headline :-)

    As for the poll in 3 minutes, I bet it's not amazing. Rentoul is hardly going to say it's dead boring.
  • old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    Peter Kellner from Yougov will be on BBC News 24's press review later this evening.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

    @isam Try this.....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10022601/NHS-counts-900-million-cost-of-treating-EU-visitors.html
    I read this morning that British visitors and tourists are being refused free treatment in several Spanish hospitals, that demand payement up front for medical treatment or advice.
    But I can't find the link.

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768

    TSE - thanks for completing the suspenseful Farron headline :-)

    As for the poll in 3 minutes, I bet it's not amazing. Rentoul is hardly going to say it's dead boring.

    I see you were as baffled as I was by the ComRes westminster/EU splits.

    I genuinely thought I had misread the numbers, then I thought someone had made a mistake at comres with the data tables.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053

    Peter Kellner from Yougov will be on BBC News 24's press review later this evening.

    I saw William Hague kiss his wife earlier on TV news. Ouch!

  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    AndyJS said:
    How far can Labour fall?

    As the main opposition party with UKIP splitting the right?

    Un - f***ing - believable.

  • old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    After thinking about it, it has just dawned on me that you were referring to Hague kissing Kellner's wife.
    I was struggling to think what objection people would have to Ffion!
    MikeK said:

    Peter Kellner from Yougov will be on BBC News 24's press review later this evening.

    I saw William Hague kiss his wife earlier on TV news. Ouch!

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    tim said:

    @Sam

    I'd imagine it's the payments from the UK to Spain for medical treatment for Brit expats and visitors being £247 million and the reverse being £3.2 million,relating to treatment not covered by the EHIC or something like that.

    You'd need to look at the number of visitors,residents and age profiles between the two countries to see if it made any sense.
    Around 9 million Brits visit Spain each year and 800,000 live part or all of the year there.
    No idea what the numbers for Spanish people visiting and living in the UK are.

    Either way it looks like the author is an idiot.

    The EHIC card covers only temporary residence, and gives the same cover as the locals. In many EU countries health insurance is mandatory, therefore it is also mandatory for visitors.

    In addition as a resident rather than a visitor, the EHIC card lapses, so you need a different form, the E106 or E121, both of which charge the UK for health care in the Spanish NHS:

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/countryguide/Pages/healthcareinSpain.aspx

    Most of the health tourists that I see are Britons who are seasonsaly resident in the UK, often maintaining a UK residence at a relatives house, but coming here for free treatment. when things get expensive.

  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Thanks TSE.

    I've been reading (slowly, my lavatory book, my only escape time from the kids...) Nick Robinson's Live From Downing Street, hence the interest.
  • MikeK said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

    @isam Try this.....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10022601/NHS-counts-900-million-cost-of-treating-EU-visitors.html
    I read this morning that British visitors and tourists are being refused free treatment in several Spanish hospitals, that demand payement up front for medical treatment or advice.
    But I can't find the link.

    I linked it further down.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768
    edited May 2013
    I've update the thread header with the latest comres phone poll for the Independent

    UPDATE – New ComRes phone poll out for the Independent.

    Con 30 - 2


    Lab 34 -4

    LD 10 +1

    UKIP 17 +4

    As we can see both two major parties take a hit, whilst UKIP go up, it is Labour’s lowest lead with ComRes since September 2012.

    The lead of 4% makes Ipsos-Mori’s poll showing Labour a lead of 3% less of an outlier.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

    @isam Try this.....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10022601/NHS-counts-900-million-cost-of-treating-EU-visitors.html
    Or this

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/holidays/article-2320851/Getting-hospital-treatment-holiday.html

    Oh dear, between the two articles the £247 million to treat Brit visitors in Spain and £3.2 million to treat Spaniards in the UK morphed into

    Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.
    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people.


    I think thats what happened anyway, its all a bit confusing.
    But the PB Kippers will have a little frisson

    I agree it is confusing

    Either way Britain is a lot worse off arent we?

    (a) We pay Spain £247m for them to treat our citizens whilst charging them £3.2m for treating theirs

    or

    (b) spend £247m treating theirs while they only spend £3.2m on ours?

    (a) seems more likely.. or does it?!

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    ComRes Phone Poll

    The lefties have gone very quiet.

    Nick Palmer had better expose errors in the sub-tables quickly otherwise we might all start believing the headline figures.
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143
    AndyJS said:
    And for FPTP fans, Electoral Calculus gives Labour a majority of 42 on those vote shares.

    Although I think it would be a travesty, I'm almost rooting for Labour to win a majority on under one-third of the vote. Could FPTP really survive such a result?
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    Whatever happened to PAPA?
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,543
    lol Avery - we didn't get excited by YouGov's recent 10-point leads, so we'll take this one calmly too.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    The theory that it's going to be difficult for any party to poll more than 35% at the next election is starting to look like a winner.
  • old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    I suspect the Spanish have greater expertise treating those who have fallen head first from a fifth floor balcony into an empty swimming pool.
    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    tim said:

    isam said:

    To all Europhiles, I ask...

    'who would be better off, a Spaniard falling ill in Britain or a Brit with the same illness in Spain?"

    Which scenarios exist where you'd be better off being a Brit abroad in the EU than an EU non Brit in Britain?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/European_Health_Insurance_Card

    http://www.nhs.uk/NHSEngland/Healthcareabroad/EHIC/Pages/about-the-ehic.aspx
    Yes but the struggling EU countries aren't having it


    http://www.th-eu-nit.com/index.php/articles/2346-thought-youd-get-free-care-if-you-fell-sick-in-spain-britons-held-hostage-by-foreign-hospitals


    "Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.

    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people."

    Link to the source for those figures and i might take it seriously.

    I didnt write the article I just read it.

    I linked to it before saying it was from an anti EU site so is it nonsense or true?

    I will have a look for those figures.

    Answer me this though, is it true that a Spaniard in Britain gets exactly the same NHS free treatment as a UK citizen while a UK citizen in Spain gets the same as a Spanish citizen? If this is the case then its obvious that your better off being Spanish and ill in the UK isnt it? Or is that not true?

    @isam Try this.....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/health/healthnews/10022601/NHS-counts-900-million-cost-of-treating-EU-visitors.html
    Or this

    http://www.thisismoney.co.uk/money/holidays/article-2320851/Getting-hospital-treatment-holiday.html

    Oh dear, between the two articles the £247 million to treat Brit visitors in Spain and £3.2 million to treat Spaniards in the UK morphed into

    Official figures published last week revealed how Britain spent £247 million treating Spanish citizens last year.
    However, Spain spent just £3.2 million treating British people.


    I think thats what happened anyway, its all a bit confusing.
    But the PB Kippers will have a little frisson

    I agree it is confusing

    Either way Britain is a lot worse off arent we?

    (a) We pay Spain £247m for them to treat our citizens whilst charging them £3.2m for treating theirs

    or

    (b) spend £247m treating theirs while they only spend £3.2m on ours?

    (a) seems more likely.. or does it?!

  • There is something rather surreal about Tories getting excited about a poll in which their vote share is the same as John Major polled in the 1997 General election. We live in perverse times..........
  • GeoffMGeoffM Posts: 6,071

    Elope with Prince William in a bigamous gay marriage?

    Well, Gerald Howarth did warn us that there are some "who see this as but a stepping stone to something even further"

    I didn't expect him to be proved correct quite this quickly though :)
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053

    I've update the thread header with the latest comres phone poll for the Independent

    UPDATE – New ComRes phone poll out for the Independent.

    Con 30 - 2


    Lab 34 -4

    LD 10 +1

    UKIP 17 +4

    As we can see both two major parties take a hit, whilst UKIP go up, it is Labour’s lowest lead with ComRes since September 2012.

    The lead of 4% makes Ipsos-Mori’s poll showing Labour a lead of 3% less of an outlier.

    And it also shows that UKIP are picking up supporters from both the main parties.

  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768
    MikeK said:

    I've update the thread header with the latest comres phone poll for the Independent

    UPDATE – New ComRes phone poll out for the Independent.

    Con 30 - 2


    Lab 34 -4

    LD 10 +1

    UKIP 17 +4

    As we can see both two major parties take a hit, whilst UKIP go up, it is Labour’s lowest lead with ComRes since September 2012.

    The lead of 4% makes Ipsos-Mori’s poll showing Labour a lead of 3% less of an outlier.

    And it also shows that UKIP are picking up supporters from both the main parties.

    I thought that was obvious from my comment.
  • TheScreamingEaglesTheScreamingEagles Posts: 119,768
    edited May 2013

    There is something rather surreal about Tories getting excited about a poll in which their vote share is the same as John Major polled in the 1997 General election. We live in perverse times..........

    Yeah, but Ed with only a 4% lead in mid term against the incompetent fops.

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    tim said:

    @Avery

    Voters think the Conservatives are more divided today than under John Major's leadership, a new poll shows.

    Phew! That's OK, tim.

    I never thought the Conservatives were divided under John Major.

    It is the narcissism of small differences again.

  • NeilNeil Posts: 7,983
    @Avery

    We're waiting for Angus Reid to get officially excited.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,846
    Good evening, everyone.

    By Sword and Fire is proving most interesting, although one aspect did really annoy me.

    I was planning on calling the King of Felaria Philippe Valois. I thought I'd made up the last name by adding together '-ois' from Carlois and 'Val-' from, er, something else, but it turns out to be a proper name. Might keep it anyway.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    @old_labour

    I doubt those having it large in Marbs, Ibiza & TonO'Grief are the type who have their EHIC forms packed alongside their swimming cozzie!



  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited May 2013
    tim said:

    @Avery

    Some wild subsamples in that one as well.

    Voters think the Conservatives are more divided today than under John Major's leadership, a new poll shows.

    The ComRes survey for the Independent found only 29% agreed David Cameron had the leadership qualities to triumph in 2015.


    http://www.politicshome.com/uk/story/35073/

    Bad question on Dave. which you have 'accidentally' misquoted.

    The actual question was:

    "David Cameron has the leadership qualities required to win a majority at the next General Election in 2015" Agree/Don't Agree/Don't Know

    For reasons DavidL might explain, such a question would not be permitted in a court of law.
  • AndyJSAndyJS Posts: 29,395
    With this new poll the LD share is down by 14 percentage points since the general election but the Labour share is only up by 4 percentage points.
  • carlcarl Posts: 750

    There is something rather surreal about Tories getting excited about a poll in which their vote share is the same as John Major polled in the 1997 General election. We live in perverse times..........

    Yeah, but Ed with only a 4% lead in mid term against the incompetent fops.

    But the Tories consistently close to their core vote.

    If that doesn't change, and there's no sign of it doing so, then Labour win - probably with a majority.
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053

    MikeK said:

    I've update the thread header with the latest comres phone poll for the Independent

    UPDATE – New ComRes phone poll out for the Independent.

    Con 30 - 2


    Lab 34 -4

    LD 10 +1

    UKIP 17 +4

    As we can see both two major parties take a hit, whilst UKIP go up, it is Labour’s lowest lead with ComRes since September 2012.

    The lead of 4% makes Ipsos-Mori’s poll showing Labour a lead of 3% less of an outlier.

    And it also shows that UKIP are picking up supporters from both the main parties.

    I thought that was obvious from my comment.
    It never hurts to repeat the good news. ;)

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    tim said:

    AveryLP said:

    tim said:

    @Avery

    Voters think the Conservatives are more divided today than under John Major's leadership, a new poll shows.

    Phew! That's OK, tim.

    I never thought the Conservatives were divided under John Major.

    It is the narcissism of small differences again.

    You didn't think they were divided over the Corn Laws either.
    "Just a bit of joshing"

    Before my time, tim, before my time.

  • Sunil_PrasannanSunil_Prasannan Posts: 51,957

    I've update the thread header with the latest comres phone poll for the Independent

    UPDATE – New ComRes phone poll out for the Independent.

    Con 30 - 2


    Lab 34 -4

    LD 10 +1

    UKIP 17 +4

    As we can see both two major parties take a hit, whilst UKIP go up, it is Labour’s lowest lead with ComRes since September 2012.

    The lead of 4% makes Ipsos-Mori’s poll showing Labour a lead of 3% less of an outlier.

    ComRes/The Sunil

    Tory/UKIP 47%
    Progressives 44%
  • FensterFenster Posts: 2,115
    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,543
    Sample period Friday to Sunday, by the way - this is where we start debating bank holiday weekend effects. :-)
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Neil said:

    @Avery

    We're waiting for Angus Reid to get officially excited.

    Angus would only get excited if it were a referendum on independence, Neil.

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    A lot of volatility, and the question of the solidity of all parties leads does make it a good betting election in 2015.
  • AndyJS said:

    The theory that it's going to be difficult for any party to poll more than 35% at the next election is starting to look like a winner.

    Not only that but if the three establishment parties continue to poll so badly we could have the situation where less than half of the electorate actually voted for them. On these current figures with a 65.1% turnout (I can't see the turnout being in excess of 2010) the three establishment parties combined vote would amount to 47.5% of the electorate.
  • old_labourold_labour Posts: 3,238
    I doubt some of them bother with a swimming cozzie.
    isam said:

    @old_labour

    I doubt those having it large in Marbs, Ibiza & TonO'Grief are the type who have their EHIC forms packed alongside their swimming cozzie!



  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited May 2013

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    A lot of volatility, and the question of the solidity of all parties leads does make it a good betting election in 2015.
    Daily Mail front page interesting Dr. Sox.

    "82% more likely to die in surgery at the weekend"

    Being discussed on Sky News Press Review now.

    Apparently based on study with a sample of over a million ops.

    [Edit: story appears also to be sole flash on front page of DT]
  • Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    I agree. If I was Cameron, Clegg or Miliband I'd complacently carry on regardless knowing without question that when it comes to the crunch all these lost little sheep will tamely come running back to their paternalistic parent parties........
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited May 2013
    tim said:

    The Times front page claiming that Tories believe if they push through the communications bill then the Lib Dems will push through a mansion tax with Labour

    Silly story.

    Ed wouldn't fall for that.

    For many reasons but the Berlusconi experience in Italy probably stands out best.

  • AndyJS said:

    The theory that it's going to be difficult for any party to poll more than 35% at the next election is starting to look like a winner.

    Not only that but if the three establishment parties continue to poll so badly we could have the situation where less than half of the electorate actually voted for them. On these current figures with a 65.1% turnout (I can't see the turnout being in excess of 2010) the three establishment parties combined vote would amount to 47.5% of the electorate.
    The point being that for the first time since universal suffrage that the Westminster three no longer attract a majority of British voters support (the lowest was 54% in 2001).
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    Carola said:
    It is all getting too complicated, Carola.

    How does one interpret the signal of an inverted umbrella?

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    @tim

    Do we know where George is on holiday?

    I bet it is not Ibiza.
  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    AveryLP said:

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    A lot of volatility, and the question of the solidity of all parties leads does make it a good betting election in 2015.
    Daily Mail front page interesting Dr. Sox.

    "82% more likely to die in surgery at the weekend"

    Being discussed on Sky News Press Review now.

    Apparently based on study with a sample of over a million ops.

    [Edit: story appears also to be sole flash on front page of DT]
    Dear ALP,

    I would be surprised if it was anything different, just as people admitted at the weekend are more likely to die.

    Most admissions and surgical operations at the weekend are emergencies, and therefore of sicker and more unstable medical conditions.

    An emergency bowel resection for acute obstruction is quite a different kettle of fish to a planned bowel resection.

    Comparing mortality and morbidity of planned and emergency care is open to these, and other influences.
  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited May 2013
    Who is up for this bet?

    I will lay EVS UKIP <10% at GE2015 if someone will lay me 6s they get >15%

    You have treble my stake

    **Actually, off that

  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815

    AveryLP said:

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    A lot of volatility, and the question of the solidity of all parties leads does make it a good betting election in 2015.
    Daily Mail front page interesting Dr. Sox.

    "82% more likely to die in surgery at the weekend"

    Being discussed on Sky News Press Review now.

    Apparently based on study with a sample of over a million ops.

    [Edit: story appears also to be sole flash on front page of DT]
    Dear ALP,

    I would be surprised if it was anything different, just as people admitted at the weekend are more likely to die.

    Most admissions and surgical operations at the weekend are emergencies, and therefore of sicker and more unstable medical conditions.

    An emergency bowel resection for acute obstruction is quite a different kettle of fish to a planned bowel resection.

    Comparing mortality and morbidity of planned and emergency care is open to these, and other influences.
    Makes sense.

    But from the little I could glean from the Sky discussion it does look like a pukka report rather than a tabloid scare story.

    Let's wait for the full article.
  • The Indy story on the poll:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/exclusive-tories-now-more-divided-than-under-john-major-voters-believe-8635243.html

    Of course all those UKIP voters are coming back:

    .....Most worryingly for Tory strategists, the notion that the party is at war with itself appears to be growing. Fifty-six per cent regard the Conservatives as more divided than during John Major’s turbulent leadership in the 1990s, with only 23 per cent disagreeing. Forty-nine per cent of Tory voters and 72 per cent of Ukip supporters see the party as more split than it was in the 1990s.

    The recent turmoil also seems to have tarnished the voters’ view of the Prime Minister’s leadership ability, with 61 per cent doubting he possesses the qualities required to win the election outright in 2015, compared with 23 per cent who believe he has the necessary skills.

    Nearly two-thirds of Tory supporters (63 per cent) still have confidence in his leadership. But the opposite view is held by an overwhelming 86 per cent of Ukip backers, many of whom are disillusioned former Conservative voters who Mr Cameron needs to tempt back
  • MrJonesMrJones Posts: 3,523
    suicide dog-whistling
  • MikeKMikeK Posts: 9,053

    I've update the thread header with the latest comres phone poll for the Independent

    UPDATE – New ComRes phone poll out for the Independent.

    Con 30 - 2


    Lab 34 -4

    LD 10 +1

    UKIP 17 +4

    As we can see both two major parties take a hit, whilst UKIP go up, it is Labour’s lowest lead with ComRes since September 2012.

    The lead of 4% makes Ipsos-Mori’s poll showing Labour a lead of 3% less of an outlier.

    ComRes/The Sunil

    Tory/UKIP 47%
    Progressives 44%
    My dear Sunnil, I think you should call them regressives not progressives. So much truer.

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    edited May 2013

    The Indy story on the poll:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/exclusive-tories-now-more-divided-than-under-john-major-voters-believe-8635243.html

    Of course all those UKIP voters are coming back:

    .....Most worryingly for Tory strategists, the notion that the party is at war with itself appears to be growing. Fifty-six per cent regard the Conservatives as more divided than during John Major’s turbulent leadership in the 1990s, with only 23 per cent disagreeing. Forty-nine per cent of Tory voters and 72 per cent of Ukip supporters see the party as more split than it was in the 1990s.

    The recent turmoil also seems to have tarnished the voters’ view of the Prime Minister’s leadership ability, with 61 per cent doubting he possesses the qualities required to win the election outright in 2015, compared with 23 per cent who believe he has the necessary skills.

    Nearly two-thirds of Tory supporters (63 per cent) still have confidence in his leadership. But the opposite view is held by an overwhelming 86 per cent of Ukip backers, many of whom are disillusioned former Conservative voters who Mr Cameron needs to tempt back

    What do UKIP voters think of Miliband?

    *reminds me of the old WHU chant

    "What do you think of Millwall?"
    "SH*T!"
    "What do you think of sh*t?"
    "MILLWALL!"

  • foxinsoxukfoxinsoxuk Posts: 23,548
    AveryLP said:

    AveryLP said:

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    A lot of volatility, and the question of the solidity of all parties leads does make it a good betting election in 2015.
    Daily Mail front page interesting Dr. Sox.

    "82% more likely to die in surgery at the weekend"

    Being discussed on Sky News Press Review now.

    Apparently based on study with a sample of over a million ops.

    [Edit: story appears also to be sole flash on front page of DT]
    Dear ALP,

    I would be surprised if it was anything different, just as people admitted at the weekend are more likely to die.

    Most admissions and surgical operations at the weekend are emergencies, and therefore of sicker and more unstable medical conditions.

    An emergency bowel resection for acute obstruction is quite a different kettle of fish to a planned bowel resection.

    Comparing mortality and morbidity of planned and emergency care is open to these, and other influences.
    Makes sense.

    But from the little I could glean from the Sky discussion it does look like a pukka report rather than a tabloid scare story.

    Let's wait for the full article.
    It may be this story:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2332152/Why-avoid-heart-surgery-Friday-Its-dangerous-times-year-treated.html

    The study took place in the USA.

  • isamisam Posts: 41,118
    tim said:

    isam said:

    The Indy story on the poll:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/exclusive-tories-now-more-divided-than-under-john-major-voters-believe-8635243.html

    Of course all those UKIP voters are coming back:

    .....Most worryingly for Tory strategists, the notion that the party is at war with itself appears to be growing. Fifty-six per cent regard the Conservatives as more divided than during John Major’s turbulent leadership in the 1990s, with only 23 per cent disagreeing. Forty-nine per cent of Tory voters and 72 per cent of Ukip supporters see the party as more split than it was in the 1990s.

    The recent turmoil also seems to have tarnished the voters’ view of the Prime Minister’s leadership ability, with 61 per cent doubting he possesses the qualities required to win the election outright in 2015, compared with 23 per cent who believe he has the necessary skills.

    Nearly two-thirds of Tory supporters (63 per cent) still have confidence in his leadership. But the opposite view is held by an overwhelming 86 per cent of Ukip backers, many of whom are disillusioned former Conservative voters who Mr Cameron needs to tempt back

    What do UKIP voters think of Miliband?

    *reminds me of the old WHU chant

    "What do you think of Millwall?"
    "SH*T!"
    "What do you think of sh*t?"
    "MILLWALL!"

    MORI May

    UKIP voter approval

    Cameron -73
    Miliband -50
    Is that because, although they disagree with him, they think Ed is more genuine in his pursuit of equality, diversity etc?

  • isam said:

    The Indy story on the poll:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/exclusive-tories-now-more-divided-than-under-john-major-voters-believe-8635243.html

    Of course all those UKIP voters are coming back:

    .....Most worryingly for Tory strategists, the notion that the party is at war with itself appears to be growing. Fifty-six per cent regard the Conservatives as more divided than during John Major’s turbulent leadership in the 1990s, with only 23 per cent disagreeing. Forty-nine per cent of Tory voters and 72 per cent of Ukip supporters see the party as more split than it was in the 1990s.

    The recent turmoil also seems to have tarnished the voters’ view of the Prime Minister’s leadership ability, with 61 per cent doubting he possesses the qualities required to win the election outright in 2015, compared with 23 per cent who believe he has the necessary skills.

    Nearly two-thirds of Tory supporters (63 per cent) still have confidence in his leadership. But the opposite view is held by an overwhelming 86 per cent of Ukip backers, many of whom are disillusioned former Conservative voters who Mr Cameron needs to tempt back

    What do UKIP voters think of Miliband?

    Sadly the article does not reveal that. Whether or not the poll asked the question or not we will have to wait for the detailed data to find out.
  • CharlesCharles Posts: 35,758

    Good evening, everyone.

    By Sword and Fire is proving most interesting, although one aspect did really annoy me.

    I was planning on calling the King of Felaria Philippe Valois. I thought I'd made up the last name by adding together '-ois' from Carlois and 'Val-' from, er, something else, but it turns out to be a proper name. Might keep it anyway.

    It's quite a famous real name, though. That old Salic Law had them rolling in the aisles.
  • CarolaCarola Posts: 1,805
    AveryLP said:

    Carola said:
    It is all getting too complicated, Carola.

    How does one interpret the signal of an inverted umbrella?

    I think in this case it's just wind.
  • AveryLPAveryLP Posts: 7,815
    edited May 2013

    AveryLP said:

    AveryLP said:

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    Fenster said:

    Tonight's poll in laymans terms:

    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Labour
    No enthusiasm among swing voters for Conservatives
    No enthusiasm among anyone but their hard-core for the Lib Dems
    Growing enthusiasm for UKIP*

    *Which I don't believe is any 'real' enthusiasm at all outside their own hard-core. Instead just a collaboration of Tory right-wingers, protest voters, naive believers in Cleggasm and Labou-supporting wind-up merchants.

    How this growing band of un-ideological, free-wheelers and fickle-heads vote at the next GE will decide who wins. As will whether many of them bother to vote at all.

    If I were Cameron or Miliband I wouldn't be at all concerned by a mid-term poll like this. Although Miliband should perhaps be a bit concerned that constant news about Tories versus UKIP is completely drowning out any news about Labour.

    A lot of volatility, and the question of the solidity of all parties leads does make it a good betting election in 2015.
    Daily Mail front page interesting Dr. Sox.

    "82% more likely to die in surgery at the weekend"

    Being discussed on Sky News Press Review now.

    Apparently based on study with a sample of over a million ops.

    [Edit: story appears also to be sole flash on front page of DT]
    Dear ALP,

    I would be surprised if it was anything different, just as people admitted at the weekend are more likely to die.

    Most admissions and surgical operations at the weekend are emergencies, and therefore of sicker and more unstable medical conditions.

    An emergency bowel resection for acute obstruction is quite a different kettle of fish to a planned bowel resection.

    Comparing mortality and morbidity of planned and emergency care is open to these, and other influences.
    Makes sense.

    But from the little I could glean from the Sky discussion it does look like a pukka report rather than a tabloid scare story.

    Let's wait for the full article.
    It may be this story:

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-2332152/Why-avoid-heart-surgery-Friday-Its-dangerous-times-year-treated.html

    The study took place in the USA.

    Trying to read the front page jpg on politicshome.com suggests the Mail story is based on a study by Imperial College in the UK.


  • RichardNabaviRichardNabavi Posts: 3,413
    Some sure-fire ways to go mad, or at best lose money:

    1) Take mid-term polls literally

    2) Believe that UKIP will get 17% (let alone 22%) of the vote in the next general election

    3) Try to figure out why sub-sample A in poll B is incompatible with sub-sample C in poll D

    4) Argue with a Scot Nat, except as an innocent (albeit cruel) piece of fun

    5) Take articles showing that Donald Trump has a good chance of being the next Republican presidential candidate seriously

    6) Try to figure out a route by which Boris becomes Next PM
This discussion has been closed.