politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Ed’s big day – But is the big news of the day just outside of Manchester?
Ed’s last two party conference speeches have dominated the political landscape, two years ago it was the One Nation speech, last year it was the energy price freeze speech. Both speeches saw a temporary uplift in his personal ratings.
I wonder if having both by-elections on the same day will help energise UKIP, or stretch its resources thin?
FPT: If Miliband's proposing to oppose English votes for English laws and then have his Scottish MPs vote for a tax in England which wouldn't apply in Scotland Cameron may as well cancel his conference and just show a replay of Miliband's.
Edited extra bit: Mr. Neil, that is a fair point. The riposte is that Miliband's immediately providing* an example of a tax being imposed on England by Scottish MPs voting on a matter which won't affect them or their constituents.
A tax on homes today, but what tomorrow? A tax on jobs? Sales? Income?
Depends how much is devolved, but Miliband's working hard to set a precedent for democratically indefensible actions.
*If it's confirmed it would be for England only but would be voted for by Scottish MPs.
How often has local knowledge and the sense on the ground been proven no more accurate than a stopped clock? Maybe UKIP will challenge in Heywood, but until I see hard evidence I'm unconvinced.
Incidentally, I know conference season is the time of year for the Westminster bubble to talk to each other. But the suggestion that constitutional reform will be a vote-winner in 2015 is the most loony conference theme for ages.
Ed is promising Scottish votes for English taxes to pay for Scottish welfare.
A brave position.
Just checking, please, did he actually connect the two in his speech, or is it PBers' inference - natural as it is in the absence of a SNP type self-denying ordinance?
I wonder if having both by-elections on the same day will help energise UKIP, or stretch its resources thin?
I think the former rather than the latter - given the geographic disparity activists aren't really going to be spoilt for choice as to which one to go to, so the only person being 'spread thin' really is Farage.
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
Should mean a boost for Scottish high end property though - of course the revenue from the stamp duty sales will go to Westminster to spend on HS2 etc..
I am genuinely do not believe that the mansion tax/Scottish votes matter is as is being reported on this board. It cannot be. With all the EV4EL fuss over recent days I simply don't believe that someone in LabHQ would not have picked up on it. The Tory line of "First they came for the wealthy English, next they may come for you.." is so obvious that this must be being misreported
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
Should mean a boost for Scottish high end property though - of course the revenue from the stamp duty sales will go to Westminster to spend on HS2 etc..
What larks !
Scottish stamp duty is devolved, no?
Soon it will be..
"Devolved taxation in Scotland
"The Scotland Act 2012 gives the Scottish Parliament the power to set a Scottish rate of income tax to be administered by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) for Scottish taxpayers. It is expected to apply from April 2016. The Act also fully devolves the power to raise taxes on land transactions and on waste disposal to landfill – it is expected that this will take effect in April 2015, at which point the existing Stamp Duty Land Tax and Landfill Tax will not apply in Scotland. The Act also provides powers for new taxes to be created in Scotland and for additional taxes to be devolved.""
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
www.sportinglife.com/bettingzone/converter
If the odds are x and your stake is £n then you will get £(n * (x + 1)) back if you win, so your winnings will be £(n*x)
I am genuinely do not believe that the mansion tax/Scottish votes matter is as is being reported on this board. It cannot be. With all the EV4EL fuss over recent days I simply don't believe that someone in LabHQ would not have picked up on it. The Tory line of "First they came for the wealthy English, next they may come for you.." is so obvious that this must be being misreported
I struggle to believe that the proposed Mansion Tax would not apply in Scotland.
"The mansion tax is an English situation at the moment, but we will take soundings from our Scottish colleagues as well" @CarolineFlintMP"
Thanks, Mr. Flashman (deceased). I am gob smacked. Now of all times, when EVEL is in the news and Labour opposing it, to propose a tax on England voted on by Scottish MPs is just such awful politics. I appreciate Miliband's speech has probably been planned for weeks but surely someone in Labour might have actually thought about this and how it might be portrayed.
Wish there had been a "Post referendum SNP membership market" they've just gone past 50,000 members.
Even though most of these new members are just people lashing out looking for a release that's still almost £1,000,000 pounds in subs taken just before an election and if even just 10% turn out to be useful operatives then that's still a lot of new active members.
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
I am genuinely do not believe that the mansion tax/Scottish votes matter is as is being reported on this board. It cannot be. With all the EV4EL fuss over recent days I simply don't believe that someone in LabHQ would not have picked up on it. The Tory line of "First they came for the wealthy English, next they may come for you.." is so obvious that this must be being misreported
They were probably so excited at the prospect of unveiling a centre piece 'bash the rich' vote winning policy that they didn't notice the tartan clad elephant crashing about the room.
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
Take one off the big number and that's the "to one" odds
So 1.26 is 0.26/1 which if you can do fractions, which I'm sure you can, is roughly 1/4 as the others on here said
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
1.26 means for each £1 placed you get £1.26 back.
This includes the original stake, so 1.26 - 1 = 0.26 decimal odds = 1/4
If you had decimal odds of 7.0, take the 1 (stake) leaves 6.0 = 6/1
If you have 4.5, take 1 = 3.5, changed to nice fraction = 7/2
Well labour just traded at 1.26 in Heywood and Middleton... Only £8 mind
Mr Isam, or indeed anyone, could you explain or point to a resource that explains decimal odds and how to convert them back to old money. Old codgers like me just don't understand the like of "1.26". Thanks.
www.sportinglife.com/bettingzone/converter
If the odds are x and your stake is £n then you will get £(n * (x + 1)) back if you win, so your winnings will be £(n*x)
Many thanks to all who answered my question, I am grateful.
Incidentally, I know conference season is the time of year for the Westminster bubble to talk to each other. But the suggestion that constitutional reform will be a vote-winner in 2015 is the most loony conference theme for ages.
Really?
You have just been given a prime example, Scottish MP's voting for a mansion tax that applies in England but not Scotland. Do you think that kind of undemocratic rubbish will bypass the voter and go unpunished?
It has been said that Cameron and Co are rubbish at actual politics, and up until now I would agree, but they have well and truly skewered Ed on this, and so close to the GE too.
Incidentally, I know conference season is the time of year for the Westminster bubble to talk to each other. But the suggestion that constitutional reform will be a vote-winner in 2015 is the most loony conference theme for ages.
Really?
You have just been given a prime example, Scottish MP's voting for a mansion tax that applies in England but not Scotland. Do you think that kind of undemocratic rubbish will bypass the voter and go unpunished?
It has been said that Cameron and Co are rubbish at actual politics, and up until now I would agree, but they have well and truly skewered Ed on this, and so close to the GE too.
I'm not sure that Cameron and Co have skewered Ed, more that he's skewered himself. It is interesting how little we've heard from the Tories over the last couple of days (in contrast to how they might usually try make announcements etc. to distract the media from Lab Conference) - presumably on the basis of never interrupting your enemy when he is making a mistake.
I am genuinely do not believe that the mansion tax/Scottish votes matter is as is being reported on this board. It cannot be. With all the EV4EL fuss over recent days I simply don't believe that someone in LabHQ would not have picked up on it. The Tory line of "First they came for the wealthy English, next they may come for you.." is so obvious that this must be being misreported
If it's true (if!), something like "An Englishman's home is a taxable castle (if the Scots say it is)" then?
Incidentally, I know conference season is the time of year for the Westminster bubble to talk to each other. But the suggestion that constitutional reform will be a vote-winner in 2015 is the most loony conference theme for ages.
Really?
You have just been given a prime example, Scottish MP's voting for a mansion tax that applies in England but not Scotland. Do you think that kind of undemocratic rubbish will bypass the voter and go unpunished?
It has been said that Cameron and Co are rubbish at actual politics, and up until now I would agree, but they have well and truly skewered Ed on this, and so close to the GE too.
I'm not sure that Cameron and Co have skewered Ed, more that he's skewered himself. It is interesting how little we've heard from the Tories over the last couple of days - presumably on the basis of never interrupting your enemy when he is making a mistake.
The enemy has been too busy 'high fiving' itself with some more banker bashing to notice.
The real problem is what it says about Labour’s own confidence. The party is advertising its belief that it cannot win in England. The more Mr Miliband objects to English self-rule, the more he tacitly concedes his unpopularity among the English. The louder the hostilities between the parties on this, the clearer the impression that one is happy to take its chances in England and the other dreads such a prospect. A serious party cannot be seen to write off its chances in a nation that accounts for 85 per cent of the total electorate.
The real problem is what it says about Labour’s own confidence. The party is advertising its belief that it cannot win in England. The more Mr Miliband objects to English self-rule, the more he tacitly concedes his unpopularity among the English. The louder the hostilities between the parties on this, the clearer the impression that one is happy to take its chances in England and the other dreads such a prospect. A serious party cannot be seen to write off its chances in a nation that accounts for 85 per cent of the total electorate.
And after last Thursday the SNP are snapping at their heels in 41 Scottish seats.
The real problem is what it says about Labour’s own confidence. The party is advertising its belief that it cannot win in England. The more Mr Miliband objects to English self-rule, the more he tacitly concedes his unpopularity among the English. The louder the hostilities between the parties on this, the clearer the impression that one is happy to take its chances in England and the other dreads such a prospect. A serious party cannot be seen to write off its chances in a nation that accounts for 85 per cent of the total electorate.
And after last Thursday the SNP are snapping at their heels in 41 Scottish seats.
"No taxation without representation" .has some historical resonance. The English who are subject to such a tax did not have the chance to elect, and cannot sack these Scottish MPs.
The real problem is what it says about Labour’s own confidence. The party is advertising its belief that it cannot win in England. The more Mr Miliband objects to English self-rule, the more he tacitly concedes his unpopularity among the English. The louder the hostilities between the parties on this, the clearer the impression that one is happy to take its chances in England and the other dreads such a prospect. A serious party cannot be seen to write off its chances in a nation that accounts for 85 per cent of the total electorate.
And after last Thursday the SNP are snapping at their heels in 41 Scottish seats.
It's a good job they've got Wales...
Nice comments, and they bring a ray of sunshine with them.
However, as some of the lefties on here never seem to tire of pointing out, Labour's apparent malaise - as presented in the media - has not been mirrored in any poll results. Very disheartening.
Kellner on R4: "No party has ever won when it is behind on both leadership and the economy- Miliband needs to get ahead on at least one of them, preferably both."
Its not been mentioned on here I don;t thik, but Breitbart have an interesting story about UKIP and overseas aid (a 90% cut).
Say what you like, but that may well prove rather popular.
"For decades we have been told overseas aid makes the world a safer place, but ask anyone on the streets of Britain whether they think the world feels safer and you'll struggle to get any positive answers.”
The Middleton and Heywood situation is interesting. It would be absolutely seismic if UKIP won two by-elections in one go. Still, can't quite see it happening, though.
Its not been mentioned on here I don;t thik, but Breitbart have an interesting story about UKIP and overseas aid (a 90% cut).
Say what you like, but that may well prove rather popular.
"For decades we have been told overseas aid makes the world a safer place, but ask anyone on the streets of Britain whether they think the world feels safer and you'll struggle to get any positive answers.”
I think all Labour's key headline policies only apply to England and only get into law if Scottish MP's vote for them, assuming Labour have any left. The Tories will ramp up the WLQ hugely, especially as already 2/3 of voters think its a fair and reasonable position to take. If Labour do get in and try to push their England only NHS, welfare and education policies through with Scottish votes, I wouldn't be surprised to see near anarchy in England. Labour really don't get it.
On the NHS, nearer the actual election, I can see relentless Tory side by side comparison of the Welsh NHS and NHS England. When people see how dreadful Labour are at running a health service, I cannot see their polling advantage continuing.
@isam The "aid" budget, is not about spending money where it will help the poor, it is a political lever. It's a kind of reverse blackmail. edit: usually known as a bribe
Damage something which is already running reasonably well to appeal to Ed's sawdust headed lumpenpolititariat.
last year he offered a 2 year price freeze when at least 3 big elec companies already offered it and we had some of the cheapest energy prices in Europe.
Anyway, where's the other 99.9% of the deficit to be covered from? Has Ballsy told us yet?
Kellner on R4: "No party has ever won when it is behind on both leadership and the economy- Miliband needs to get ahead on at least one of them, preferably both."
No doubt true, but this isn't like any election in recent history IMHO. It's going to be about who loses least badly and can scrape together a slim coalition or a minority government.
Damage something which is already running reasonably well to appeal to Ed's sawdust headed lumpenpolititariat.
last year he offered a 2 year price freeze when at least 3 big elec companies already offered it and we had some of the cheapest energy prices in Europe.
Anyway, where's the other 99.9% of the deficit to be covered from? Has Ballsy told us yet?
A windfall tax on publicly subsidised railway operators? Or an enforced price freeze or cut in fares. That wouldn't have any impact on services would it? Perhaps he'll go the whole way and suggest renationalisation?
Hurrah for the glory days of British Rail (when the trains were really shit).
Wish there had been a "Post referendum SNP membership market" they've just gone past 50,000 members.
Even though most of these new members are just people lashing out looking for a release that's still almost £1,000,000 pounds in subs taken just before an election and if even just 10% turn out to be useful operatives then that's still a lot of new active members.
It's £12 per year minimum, and 25k new members.
So that's 9 * 25k = £225,000 or more. not £1,000,000.
I'm watching to see if these new members are conspiraloon turbo-nats or something more sane.
Wish there had been a "Post referendum SNP membership market" they've just gone past 50,000 members.
Even though most of these new members are just people lashing out looking for a release that's still almost £1,000,000 pounds in subs taken just before an election and if even just 10% turn out to be useful operatives then that's still a lot of new active members.
It's £12 per year minimum, and 25k new members.
True, but the default amount is £36, you'd have to actively switch to £1 a month.
The real problem is what it says about Labour’s own confidence. The party is advertising its belief that it cannot win in England. The more Mr Miliband objects to English self-rule, the more he tacitly concedes his unpopularity among the English. The louder the hostilities between the parties on this, the clearer the impression that one is happy to take its chances in England and the other dreads such a prospect. A serious party cannot be seen to write off its chances in a nation that accounts for 85 per cent of the total electorate.
And after last Thursday the SNP are snapping at their heels in 41 Scottish seats.
Yeah, didn't the events of last week show he was tacitly conceding his unpopularity amongst the scottish.
Wish there had been a "Post referendum SNP membership market" they've just gone past 50,000 members.
Even though most of these new members are just people lashing out looking for a release that's still almost £1,000,000 pounds in subs taken just before an election and if even just 10% turn out to be useful operatives then that's still a lot of new active members.
It's £12 per year minimum, and 25k new members.
So that's 9 * 25k = £225,000 or more. not £1,000,000.
I'm watching to see if these new members are conspiraloon turbo-nats or something more sane.
'... vowing to double the number of first time homebuyers ...'
It's easy when you force a tens of thousands out of their homes with a new tax, then divvie each of them up into 3 flats. Max must be beside himself with joy.
Its not been mentioned on here I don;t thik, but Breitbart have an interesting story about UKIP and overseas aid (a 90% cut).
Say what you like, but that may well prove rather popular.
"For decades we have been told overseas aid makes the world a safer place, but ask anyone on the streets of Britain whether they think the world feels safer and you'll struggle to get any positive answers.”
Most of our aid has gone to Africa, where the level of wars has fallen precipitously. It's hardly the aid community's fault that the Middle East is a tinder box.
Harry Cole retweeted Hugo Rifkind @hugorifkind 2m Last year, Miliband spoke for an hour. This year, he starts at 14.30. And Obama speaks live at 15.00. #labconf14
@isam The "aid" budget, is not about spending money where it will help the poor, it is a political lever. It's a kind of reverse blackmail. edit: usually known as a bribe
If you're talking about the UK aid budget, this is fundamentally not true.
"By contrast, Ed Balls has pledged that at some point by 2020, the budget - excluding capital projects (housebuilding, infrastructure spending and so on) - would be in balance."
I thought it was Labour policy to balance the overall budget. That's what Rachel Reeves said the other day wasn't it?
Just watching 'highlights' of this conference - the members attending, policies being espoused and the atmosphere all seems very 'core vote' to me. "Tories" seems to be spat into every other sentence.
I take it from this that Labour will be fighting 2015 on that '35%' basis then, and make no real attempt to win over floating Tories?
Exactly how I see it working, and how I want it to work. Simple, straightforward, effective - and more importantly, you could implement it next month if the will was there.
Comments
FPT: If Miliband's proposing to oppose English votes for English laws and then have his Scottish MPs vote for a tax in England which wouldn't apply in Scotland Cameron may as well cancel his conference and just show a replay of Miliband's.
Edited extra bit: Mr. Neil, that is a fair point. The riposte is that Miliband's immediately providing* an example of a tax being imposed on England by Scottish MPs voting on a matter which won't affect them or their constituents.
A tax on homes today, but what tomorrow? A tax on jobs? Sales? Income?
Depends how much is devolved, but Miliband's working hard to set a precedent for democratically indefensible actions.
*If it's confirmed it would be for England only but would be voted for by Scottish MPs.
A brave position.
Here's Iain Martin on how EVEL could work:
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/100287360/english-votes-for-english-laws-can-work-heres-how/
I have to confess, that I have moved on to an English Parliament and a very small UK govt for Foreign Affairs, Defence and International Aid
Who'dve thought it? 16/1
Hope we are all on
https://support.skybet.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/37/~/fraction-and-decimal-pricing
"Devolved taxation in Scotland
"The Scotland Act 2012 gives the Scottish Parliament the power to set a Scottish rate of income tax to be administered by HM Revenue & Customs (HMRC) for Scottish taxpayers. It is expected to apply from April 2016. The Act also fully devolves the power to raise taxes on land transactions and on waste disposal to landfill – it is expected that this will take effect in April 2015, at which point the existing Stamp Duty Land Tax and Landfill Tax will not apply in Scotland. The Act also provides powers for new taxes to be created in Scotland and for additional taxes to be devolved.""
http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/+/http://www.hmrc.gov.uk/news/news-calman.htm
If the odds are x and your stake is £n then you will get £(n * (x + 1)) back if you win, so your winnings will be £(n*x)
You can thank me now.
Equal settlement of UK government spending would give England £300 a head higher spending.
What does that add up to over 50 odd million people?
Free tuition? Free prescription? Increased NHS spending? Better social care for the elderly?
Even though most of these new members are just people lashing out looking for a release that's still almost £1,000,000 pounds in subs taken just before an election and if even just 10% turn out to be useful operatives then that's still a lot of new active members.
http://www.sportinglife.com/bettingzone/converter
(and soon to be English voters.. )
http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/most-scots-unaware-holyrood-is-to-get-new-tax-powers.24519895
So 1.26 is 0.26/1 which if you can do fractions, which I'm sure you can, is roughly 1/4 as the others on here said
1.33=0.33/1 ie 1/3
3.75=2.75/1 ie 11/4 etc
This includes the original stake, so 1.26 - 1 = 0.26 decimal odds = 1/4
If you had decimal odds of 7.0, take the 1 (stake) leaves 6.0 = 6/1
If you have 4.5, take 1 = 3.5, changed to nice fraction = 7/2
You have just been given a prime example, Scottish MP's voting for a mansion tax that applies in England but not Scotland. Do you think that kind of undemocratic rubbish will bypass the voter and go unpunished?
It has been said that Cameron and Co are rubbish at actual politics, and up until now I would agree, but they have well and truly skewered Ed on this, and so close to the GE too.
The real problem is what it says about Labour’s own confidence. The party is advertising its belief that it cannot win in England. The more Mr Miliband objects to English self-rule, the more he tacitly concedes his unpopularity among the English. The louder the hostilities between the parties on this, the clearer the impression that one is happy to take its chances in England and the other dreads such a prospect. A serious party cannot be seen to write off its chances in a nation that accounts for 85 per cent of the total electorate.
It's a good job they've got Wales...
Say what you like, but that may well prove rather popular.
The first minister has been quoted as saying he supports EV4EL.
Ed better enjoy his moment in the sun....
However, as some of the lefties on here never seem to tire of pointing out, Labour's apparent malaise - as presented in the media - has not been mirrored in any poll results. Very disheartening.
http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-London/2014/09/23/UKIP-Propose-45bn-Overseas-Aid-Cut
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2766180/Backlash-begins-Labour-s-mansion-tax-plan-hit-middle-class-families-pensioners-2million.html
The Tories will ramp up the WLQ hugely, especially as already 2/3 of voters think its a fair and reasonable position to take.
If Labour do get in and try to push their England only NHS, welfare and education policies through with Scottish votes, I wouldn't be surprised to see near anarchy in England.
Labour really don't get it.
On the NHS, nearer the actual election, I can see relentless Tory side by side comparison of the Welsh NHS and NHS England. When people see how dreadful Labour are at running a health service, I cannot see their polling advantage continuing.
The "aid" budget, is not about spending money where it will help the poor, it is a political lever.
It's a kind of reverse blackmail.
edit: usually known as a bribe
Damage something which is already running reasonably well to appeal to Ed's sawdust headed lumpenpolititariat.
last year he offered a 2 year price freeze when at least 3 big elec companies already offered it and we had some of the cheapest energy prices in Europe.
Anyway, where's the other 99.9% of the deficit to be covered from? Has Ballsy told us yet?
Windfall tax on tobacco, click, mansion tax, whirl, defend NHS, click, bedroom tax, baby eating Tories.
Local BBC claimed that it had been a dull conference, but hadn't had any disasters.
Hurrah for the glory days of British Rail (when the trains were really shit).
So that's 9 * 25k = £225,000 or more. not £1,000,000.
I'm watching to see if these new members are conspiraloon turbo-nats or something more sane.
Just who is he popular with?
I'm surrounded by Labour activists.
I feel like Leonidas at Thermopylae.
Would you be open to suggestions?
By conservatives....???....er no, London labour MPs (Lammy, Abbott).
Paul Waugh @paulwaugh 4m
As audience awaits EdMiliband, choir is singing Lion King's hakuna matata.
I would have thought that it would be quite high say 20/1
"Barnett was supposed to [insert whatever you like here] not give free tuition fees and prescriptions to Scottish millionaires."
Harry Cole retweeted
Hugo Rifkind @hugorifkind 2m
Last year, Miliband spoke for an hour. This year, he starts at 14.30. And Obama speaks live at 15.00. #labconf14
Probably not much difference to be honest, but thought I'd let people who might have an angle know
As for one party gaining seats from two other parties on the same day, I don't think it's ever happened...
in the case of the UK, not all of it, but there is always some that goes to keeping the other party "sweet"
I thought it was Labour policy to balance the overall budget. That's what Rachel Reeves said the other day wasn't it?
I take it from this that Labour will be fighting 2015 on that '35%' basis then, and make no real attempt to win over floating Tories?
Big mistake.
Exactly how I see it working, and how I want it to work. Simple, straightforward, effective - and more importantly, you could implement it next month if the will was there.