politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » The big IndyRef polling question tonight. Will YouGov still have YES in the lead?
The extraordinary feature of these closing IndyRef polls is that the firms that hitherto were most favourable to NO have moved sharply to YES while those that hitherto had YES in the best positions have remained stable.
Poll Question: let's say YouGov showed the same 1 point lead in tonight's poll as last time, for example...where would the boys and girls here predict the BF no market move to? My guess 1.47? Shadsy suggested 58-42 in favour of NO meant no change to current market assessment of implied probabilities?
1. On budget, check out Barnett Formula: if England budgets x% less because patients are paying suppliers direct for their trusses, etc., then Scotland immediately gets an x% cut pro rata, and has to do without to the same extent (or find the dosh from elsewhere). That applies to privatisation in general, not just TTIP, of course.
As logical fallacies go, that one is an absolute humdinger! I suppose, however, that it might explain why Scottish MPs are so keen on voting for money to be wasted.
I said 'budgeted' not 'end of year outcome'. If you budget £x for hearing aid services, and privatise that, then most or all of that £x will disappear from the next year's budget. (Same if you go about it by allocating an overall total and them remove part of it.) Ergo Barnett cut. Anything illogical with that?
It must be admitted that one of the striking things about the Labour-LD aministratio0ns in Scotland was how much money they had unspent at the end of the year. Mr Swinney has reportedly been far more rigorous. And the biggest single wastes were the Parliament building and the Trams -both Labour (with help from LDs and Tories for the latter).
Mr. Owls, that's ridiculous. More bloody saturation coverage of that. For once, recently I've been glad of local news, giving more time to Rotherham than the national stuff.
FPT Are we discovering today that charm, guile, engagement and the gift of the gab can take you an awful awful long way in politics - but that when it counts content and a coherent message may prevail?
Eck looking alot like the emperor with no clothes and whimpering, blustering, deflecting. You'd need a heart of stone not to laugh.
(People give a very serious shit about being bankrupted and laughing this stuff off is trite beyond belief. They are potentially days away from committing to becoming country with no money. WTF!).
Does Yougov have a history of leaks ahead of publication? What time would we expect Yougov results to break on Twitter as confirmed accurate? It strikes me an opinion pollster could make a lot of money this week selling their data ahead of time to global macro hedge funds who like betting on this sort of thing.
If you look at the amount sterling moved yesterday, apparently largelo off the back of an opinion poll by survation, that's a potentially financiall rewarding way of getting a return from asking 1,000 people what they think about something.
I cant think of a time in living memory when advanced knowledge of polling data could have been as financiall lucrative as the lsat 48 hours and the next.
There isn't just massive liquidiity on Betfair - you could even use it to place big bets in (stake unlimited) financial markets...I wonder if hedge funds have been commissioning any private polling?
I cannot see how anyone with an ounce of sense would vote YES. The consequences, which are bad, are so starkly obvious.
Will the turkeys really vote for Xmas?
No, Mrs C, No! Please, I beg you, stop posting such stuff. You are English aren't you, or at any rate reside in England? Then the worst possible result will be a narrow NO vote. As a strong vote in favour of the Union seems impossible and our own, English, politicians seem determined to inflict an even more unbalanced settlement on us, then a YES vote is actually in our best interests.
@EconBizFin: This week's leader: Ditching the union would be a mistake for Scotland and a tragedy for the country it leaves behind http://t.co/S8ij1qzpzC
FPT Are we discovering today that charm, guile, engagement and the gift of the gab can take you an awful awful long way in politics - but that when it counts content and a coherent message may prevail?
Does Yougov have a history of leaks ahead of publication? What time would we expect Yougov results to break on Twitter as confirmed accurate? It strikes me an opinion pollster could make a lot of money this week selling their data ahead of time to global macro hedge funds who like betting on this sort of thing.
If you look at the amount sterling moved yesterday, apparently largelo off the back of an opinion poll by survation, that's a potentially financiall rewarding way of getting a return from asking 1,000 people what they think about something.
I cant think of a time in living memory when advanced knowledge of polling data could have been as financiall lucrative as the lsat 48 hours and the next.
There isn't just massive liquidiity on Betfair - you could even use it to place big bets in (stake unlimited) financial markets...I wonder if hedge funds have been commissioning any private polling?
Last time the Times published the poll lead on their website at 8.30pm, so I'd expect it anytime between 8.30pm and 10pm.
YouGov don't leak, they only send the poll to the client and no one else.
That said Rupert Murdoch's twitter feed is worth watching.
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
@faisalislam: IFS new analysis on NHS & independence "unlikely independence would make it easier to find additional money for NHS" http://t.co/QRmTspP6Wy
Those heartless Tory bastards, the IFS... Oh, wait.
Point 1 is ridiculous. The threat to Scotland of England spending less on health?
Point two, no opt out for Scotland, fine, but how on earth do you think you'll be securing any sort of opt out when you rejoin the EU as an independent country? It's doubtful you'll even be able to opt out of the euro. Salmond's going to say 'Please can we join -but that massive free trade deal you've been working on -no thanks' is he?
I'm no fan of what I've seen of TTIP -seems like pretty much an excuse for US corporations to rape and pillage to me, but clearly the best hope of any sort of 'opt out' would be to campaign for one within the UK, where a eurosceptic/left wing coalition on this issue would have real clout.
I think it's just a flat out case of misrepresenting the truth to people to be honest. Let's hope enough of them see through it.
I think you've misunderstood a couple of points, if I may
1. On budget, check out Barnett Formula: if England budgets x% less because patients are paying suppliers direct for their trusses, etc., then Scotland immediately gets an x% cut pro rata, and has to do without to the same extent (or find the dosh from elsewhere). That applies to privatisation in general, not just TTIP, of course.
2. Scotland cannot get an opt out at all separately from the UK as a whole, as the English NHS is being privatised. If it is separate it can decide to keep the TTIP from affecting its NHS, if that is still publicly funded.
On the wider EU issue, it's already very clear that needs and priorities are different in Scotland from UK as a whole (think fisheries and farming, for one thing, vs City of London). Renegotiation and a review is absolutely necessary anyway as the existing deal probably wouldn't cut it.
Carnyx, scrap the Barnett formula. Should have been done donkey's years ago as the man who came up with it has said. Surely it can't survive the current turmoil if the Scots are so stupid as to vote NO.
Mr Llama, it is what we have at the moment (if rather motheaten at the edges with e.g. Olympics) and I'd be scorned if I pretended otherwise. But I agree it will be reviewed. On that theme, I have just been reading about it in
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
Poll Question: let's say YouGov showed the same 1 point lead in tonight's poll as last time, for example...where would the boys and girls here predict the BF no market move to? My guess 1.47? Shadsy suggested 58-42 in favour of NO meant no change to current market assessment of implied probabilities?
Yesterday's Survation of 53/47 was enough to move Yes from approx 3.2 to 4.7.
I would have thought a YouGov 58/42 for No would push Yes out to approx 7.
58/42 for No plus all the news re banks moving etc would surely just about finish it.
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
ICM also ring mobiles
Ken (and TSE) - just been reading a discussion of the ICM telephone issue on Scotgoespop, if you are interested.
@EconBizFin: This week's leader: Ditching the union would be a mistake for Scotland and a tragedy for the country it leaves behind http://t.co/S8ij1qzpzC
Whoever wrote that marvellous piece in the Economist should have been in charge of the Better Together campaign.
Then the worst possible result will be a narrow NO vote. As a strong vote in favour of the Union seems impossible and our own, English, politicians seem determined to inflict an even more unbalanced settlement on us, then a YES vote is actually in our best interests.
Sorry Mr Llama, but I must disagree. Partly because I am a sentimentalist but also because I am a realist.
The thought of being rid of so many apparently embittered, ungrateful ingrates is comforting but they are only a fraction of the people in Scotland. What about the rest who do not want to be cut loose? Surely we have to stand by them and support them or it is not much of a union. Not all the YES voters will be the bitter, nasty Nats either. Many of them will be decent people who have been talked round, misled or just have some sort of dream. We need to offer them the other side of the argument, persuade them to change their mind.
Next - do not imagine that the effects will be limited to Scotland. We are entwined with them as a result of 300 years of integration and it is very difficult to untangle things. There will be severe economic impacts down here too. And what about emigration? What about those who are not encumbered with mortgages and just decide to leave and head south?
The situation is a shambles but it needs a better solution than throwing the baby out with the bath-water.
The Scottish referendum is looking increasingly close. Clearly there is work to be done if the best result for all is to be achieved. May I ask, plead, even beg, those posters on here who reside in Scotland to use their time more wisely. Stop posting on here and, instead, use the time to persuade your compatriots to vote YES .
It is not surprising that English posters on here who back a Scottish Yes tend to be Ukipers or crypto Ukipers who basically are happy to see Scotland commit economic hari-kari to further their real interest which is to pull the rest of the UK out of the EU. I think the recent intervention by big business in the Scottish debate is a mere foretaste of what you'd see with an EU in/out referendum. As hopefully we'll see next week enough nervous middle ground voters will take fright and opt for the status quo (albeit with devo plus in Scotland or whatever concessions DC obtains from our EU partners in that debate*).
The silly Cyberunionist NO campaign is full of negatives IMHO.
"The Scots are too stupid to rule themselves" "The Scots are too poor to rule themselves" "The Scots are too anti-English to rule themselves" "HM The Queen will have a heart attack and die if the Scots vote yes" "Scotland will immediately be consumed by the ocean if they vote yes" "There will be all-out global thermonuclear war if the Scots vote yes" "The Sun will go Nova and destroy the entire solar system if the Scots vote yes"
One of the interesting things about the last YouGov poll was that the raw numbers still showed a No vote it was only the weighting that made it a Yes vote. YouGov is unable to find enough male middle aged SNP voters. Is that because they are all out campaigning or is it that they don't really exist?
Just had a guy into today who is so mad about Salmond he went and joined the Better Together campaign last night. He is male middle aged born in Scotland and Central Belt.
Another tidbit. Walking through Glasgow this morning on the way to a meeting and watched for 10 mins the Yes campaigner on the loud speaker in the main shopping street. He was ranting and raving about Thatcher and Falklands. In 10 mins he got not one person to pick up a leaflet. Everyone was ignoring him.
It is hard to say entirely as I don't spend time with the NEDs in Springburn but the general mood swing seems to be away from the YES and Salmond. Maybe the worst thing that could have happened to the SNP was that they got a single poll lead as it has woken up the No campaign.
@Plato (from last thread) Tesco bank bought everything in house a 2008. Its head office is Edinburgh, main operations Glasgow with smaller office in Newcastle.
One of the problem with any Devomax proposals based on keeping share of income taxes is that central govt can have a direct influence on tax take. When they place a central govt agency in Scotland they would increase Scotland's tax take and vice versa. So it will become more expensive to central govt to so do.
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
ICM also ring mobiles
They may not be doing so when trying to hit a particular country / region. Its far easier to ring random numbers in a few telephone codes..
Poll Question: let's say YouGov showed the same 1 point lead in tonight's poll as last time, for example...where would the boys and girls here predict the BF no market move to? My guess 1.47? Shadsy suggested 58-42 in favour of NO meant no change to current market assessment of implied probabilities?
Yesterday's Survation of 53/47 was enough to move Yes from approx 3.2 to 4.7.
I would have thought a YouGov 58/42 for No would push Yes out to approx 7.
58/42 for No plus all the news re banks moving etc would surely just about finish it.
He's surely mistyped and means 48/52?
58 No 42 Yes would end this as an event and the price would be 12 or more.
@martinboon: Can't remember a time when so many people want a snippet of what the poll says and *promises not to tell anyone*. Not saying to any of you.
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
ICM also ring mobiles
Couldn't mention this last night due to Wifi issues, but George Takei (Mr Sulu from Star Trek) was on Through the Keyhole (Keith Lemon version) last night!
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
ICM also ring mobiles
They may not be doing so when trying to hit a particular country / region. Its far easier to ring random numbers in a few telephone codes..
I think they may use mobiles to get the 16-24 age group, who are the most unlikely group to have a landline.
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
ICM also ring mobiles
Couldn't mention this last night due to Wifi issues, but George Takei (Mr Sulu from Star Trek) was on Through the Keyhole (Keith Lemon version) last night!
Then the worst possible result will be a narrow NO vote. As a strong vote in favour of the Union seems impossible and our own, English, politicians seem determined to inflict an even more unbalanced settlement on us, then a YES vote is actually in our best interests.
Sorry Mr Llama, but I must disagree. Partly because I am a sentimentalist but also because I am a realist.
The thought of being rid of so many apparently embittered, ungrateful ingrates is comforting but they are only a fraction of the people in Scotland. What about the rest who do not want to be cut loose? Surely we have to stand by them and support them or it is not much of a union. Not all the YES voters will be the bitter, nasty Nats either. Many of them will be decent people who have been talked round, misled or just have some sort of dream. We need to offer them the other side of the argument, persuade them to change their mind.
Next - do not imagine that the effects will be limited to Scotland. We are entwined with them as a result of 300 years of integration and it is very difficult to untangle things. There will be severe economic impacts down here too. And what about emigration? What about those who are not encumbered with mortgages and just decide to leave and head south?
The situation is a shambles but it needs a better solution than throwing the baby out with the bath-water.
Thanks, Beverley, I for one appreciate the sentiment. It's a stupid project. Some of us know just how damaging it will be and has been.
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
ICM also ring mobiles
Couldn't mention this last night due to Wifi issues, but George Takei (Mr Sulu from Star Trek) was on Through the Keyhole (Keith Lemon version) last night!
The ICM poll was carried out on Tuesday, and I was one of the people that got a call from them. As a Yes voter and a blogger I was interested in asking a few questions of my own after the survey was over, so the girl put me through to her supervisor who was willing to chat. The poll is due out on Sunday, but I'll be it leaks before that.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
ICM also ring mobiles
Couldn't mention this last night due to Wifi issues, but George Takei (Mr Sulu from Star Trek) was on Through the Keyhole (Keith Lemon version) last night!
Then the worst possible result will be a narrow NO vote. As a strong vote in favour of the Union seems impossible and our own, English, politicians seem determined to inflict an even more unbalanced settlement on us, then a YES vote is actually in our best interests.
Sorry Mr Llama, but I must disagree. Partly because I am a sentimentalist but also because I am a realist.
The thought of being rid of so many apparently embittered, ungrateful ingrates is comforting but they are only a fraction of the people in Scotland. What about the rest who do not want to be cut loose? Surely we have to stand by them and support them or it is not much of a union. Not all the YES voters will be the bitter, nasty Nats either. Many of them will be decent people who have been talked round, misled or just have some sort of dream. We need to offer them the other side of the argument, persuade them to change their mind.
Next - do not imagine that the effects will be limited to Scotland. We are entwined with them as a result of 300 years of integration and it is very difficult to untangle things. There will be severe economic impacts down here too. And what about emigration? What about those who are not encumbered with mortgages and just decide to leave and head south?
The situation is a shambles but it needs a better solution than throwing the baby out with the bath-water.
Thanks, Beverley, I for one appreciate the sentiment. It's a stupid project. Some of us know just how damaging it will be and has been.
Arif Ansari (@ArifBBC) 11/09/2014 13:25 UKIP selects John Bickley to fight the Heywood and Middleton by-election. He previously fought Wythenshawe and Sale East.
Thanks, Beverley, I for one appreciate the sentiment. It's a stupid project. Some of us know just how damaging it will be and has been.
I have to agree with Mr Llama on one point - a narrow NO margin will be the worst result as it will simply inflame the extreme nationalists. The old rationale of "one more heave".
I hope the commonsense prevails, but I fear that the damage that has been done will colour relations between Scotland and the rest of us for years to come.
@Plato (from last thread) Tesco bank bought everything in house a 2008. Its head office is Edinburgh, main operations Glasgow with smaller office in Newcastle.
''I hope the commonsense prevails, but I fear that the damage that has been done will colour relations between Scotland and the rest of us for years to time.''
If Salmond doesn;t get independence, he will get big new powers anyway - which he can then sell as a victory
Just covering the south of Scotland - probably the most anti-indy location outside of shetland/orkney.
Given the absurd psephologically-illiterate hysteria about survation yesterday, I'm tempted to trade "no" on the basis that, regardless of the numbers, just the Comres coverage will move the markets a bit.
@plato FPT Threads was about a nuclear war erupting over Communist incursion over the East/west German border, the main story was about the effect of a nuclear strike on Sheffield, and the fate of the characters. The Sheffield council were trapped in an underground bunker and by the time the army had a chance to dig them out, they had all died. It focused a lot on the breakdown of social order and later went into a rather wrongheaded dystopian future with Britain back to a pre industrial rev, agrarian society. Scary, but woefully inaccurate, too optimistic about the immediate term prospects and far too pessimistic about the long term future of survivors. It is available on YouTube, broken into segments. The Day After is a better film, or the 60s War Game which accurately reflects the ingrained ignorance of the time
I said 'budgeted' not 'end of year outcome'. If you budget £x for hearing aid services, and privatise that, then most or all of that £x will disappear from the next year's budget. (Same if you go about it by allocating an overall total and them remove part of it.) Ergo Barnett cut. Anything illogical with that?
Err, yes.
To see what, ask yourself a question. Where does the mysterious lost money go?
@plato FPT Threads was about a nuclear war erupting over Communist incursion over the East/west German border, the main story was about the effect of a nuclear strike on Sheffield, and the fate of the characters. The Sheffield council were trapped in an underground bunker and by the time the army had a chance to dig them out, they had all died. It focused a lot on the breakdown of social order and later went into a rather wrongheaded dystopian future with Britain back to a pre industrial rev, agrarian society. Scary, but woefully inaccurate, too optimistic about the immediate term prospects and far too pessimistic about the long term future of survivors. It is available on YouTube, broken into segments. The Day After is a better film, or the 60s War Game which accurately reflects the ingrained ignorance of the time
Addendum, IIRC, the strike on Sheffield was an air burst, which increases the damage but takes out the fortnight's risk of radioactive fallout.
Whereas The Day After is a ground strike, so survivors are seen walking through the fallout and the associated horrific death from radiation sickness.
''I hope the commonsense prevails, but I fear that the damage that has been done will colour relations between Scotland and the rest of us for years to time.''
If Salmond doesn;t get independence, he will get big new powers anyway - which he can then sell as a victory
Its a win win for him.
The 'powers' promised by the 3 parties are bascially the aquare root of hee and haw. Full control over income tax (which Labour is unwilling to give, going for a doubly ludicrous partial control) is a double edged sword that will lead to bad government - policies that increase economic activity and national tax take but decrease income tax would be a budget cut for Scotland, conversely a pathological policy that boosts income tax but kills overall economic activity and tax take would be a budget rise.
The Scottish referendum is looking increasingly close. Clearly there is work to be done if the best result for all is to be achieved. May I ask, plead, even beg, those posters on here who reside in Scotland to use their time more wisely. Stop posting on here and, instead, use the time to persuade your compatriots to vote YES .
It is not surprising that English posters on here who back a Scottish Yes tend to be Ukipers or crypto Ukipers who basically are happy to see Scotland commit economic hari-kari to further their real interest which is to pull the rest of the UK out of the EU. I think the recent intervention by big business in the Scottish debate is a mere foretaste of what you'd see with an EU in/out referendum. As hopefully we'll see next week enough nervous middle ground voters will take fright and opt for the status quo (albeit with devo plus in Scotland or whatever concessions DC obtains from our EU partners in that debate*).
* if it ever happens
UKIP is in favour of Scotland remaining within the UK.
I said 'budgeted' not 'end of year outcome'. If you budget £x for hearing aid services, and privatise that, then most or all of that £x will disappear from the next year's budget. (Same if you go about it by allocating an overall total and them remove part of it.) Ergo Barnett cut. Anything illogical with that?
Err, yes.
To see what, ask yourself a question. Where does the mysterious lost money go?
I think we are talking at cross purposes, mostly my fault (but thank you anyway). I admit I should have been clearer and said it was to do with overall departmental budgeting. If the Dept of Health gets gets £x one year and that is reduced the next year, for whatever reason (such as targets for privatisation), the Barnett consequential makes a comparable reduction in that element of the Scottish grant. Okay?
That is, I entirely agree, not the same as money saved each year (which may or may not revert to the Treasury from Scotland: I am not sure if this is compulsory though it was certainly remitted under Labour-LDs.
Andrew Roberts chapter in "Enoch at 100" is called "Enoch Powell and the Nation State". I read it yesterday for the first time and it makes many similar points, have you read it?
Hmmm, so it looks like the 16-24 demo was majorly from the Glasgow area and it formed a major part of the Glasgow demographic.
So given how much they were upwighted an outlier level of No-ness amongst them would explain why both that group and Glasgow was so out of line with the rest of the polls.
Can the Cyberunionists explain why if we are "better together" we play our three most popular team sports, football, rugby and cricket, as separate teams and leagues? And in the case of the first two, we have done so since the mid-19th century?
If we are so "United" as a Kingdom, would you argue for a united UK football team and football league?
Interesting article, not an aspect I had considered before.
Here's another - given that the John Lewis CEO have suggested that their prices in Scotland will have to rise eventually because England subsidises their operations in further flung places then presumably that will apply to the Royal Mail. One price fitting all UK destinations will surely be no more.
It's almost worth a Yes win just to see ScottP put an effing sock in it.
Have you worked out whether to defend or deny your blatant multiple-alter-egoism yet? Or are you going to stick with just denying things you haven't been accused of?
Would be nice if you came clean before continuing to attack other posters.
Anyone have thoughts on the next leader of the SNP market? Not sure if Salmond is on borrowed time, if he goes then all the promissory notes he has issued to the likes of Murdoch and Souter, on behalf of the SNP, can be torn up.
Ladbrokes have Sturgeon at 1/2 but the rest of the list could make some good returns.
@Carnyx - OK, fair enough, but the central point remains: Scotland is not any way disadvantaged by savings made in the rest of the UK on specific departmental spending. Either the money saved is spent on some other budget (in which there is zero effect on Scotland), or taxes are reduced, or the deficit is reduced. The only thing which actually matters is the overall spending envelope determined by the Chancellor. For that reason, Scottish MPs who vote in Westminster on matters which don't affect Scotland, and justify this democratic disgrace by reference to the Barnett formula, are being intellectually dishonest. They would vote on the Budget only, if they were being honest.
Can the Cyberunionists explain why if we are "better together" we play our three most popular team sports, football, rugby and cricket, as separate teams and leagues? And in the case of the first two, we have done so since the mid-19th century?
If we are so "United" as a Kingdom, would you argue for a united UK football team and football league?
Can the Cyberunionists explain why if we are "better together" we play our three most popular team sports, football, rugby and cricket, as separate teams and leagues? And in the case of the first two, we have done so since the mid-19th century?
If we are so "United" as a Kingdom, would you argue for a united UK football team and football league?
Manchester, Liverpool, London, Birmingham, are all single cities with more than one football team.
Can the Cyberunionists explain why if we are "better together" we play our three most popular team sports, football, rugby and cricket, as separate teams and leagues? And in the case of the first two, we have done so since the mid-19th century?
Geography - was too far to travel to Inverness from Plymouth by stagecoach in 1872.
Can the Cyberunionists explain why if we are "better together" we play our three most popular team sports, football, rugby and cricket, as separate teams and leagues? And in the case of the first two, we have done so since the mid-19th century?
If we are so "United" as a Kingdom, would you argue for a united UK football team and football league?
Can the Cyberunionists explain why if we are "better together" we play our three most popular team sports, football, rugby and cricket, as separate teams and leagues? And in the case of the first two, we have done so since the mid-19th century?
If we are so "United" as a Kingdom, would you argue for a united UK football team and football league?
Manchester, Liverpool, London, Birmingham, are all single cities with more than one football team.
However Leeds, Coventry, Leicester and Hull only have one major team.
Anyone have thoughts on the next leader of the SNP market? Not sure if Salmond is on borrowed time, if he goes then all the promissory notes he has issued to the likes of Murdoch and Souter, on behalf of the SNP, can be torn up.
Ladbrokes have Sturgeon at 1/2 but the rest of the list could make some good returns.
Comments
Will the turkeys really vote for Xmas?
Some soul searching by Labour Uncut re S Yorks.
http://labour-uncut.co.uk/2014/09/11/the-rotherham-abuse-is-merely-yet-another-facet-of-the-disastrous-biraderi-politics-labour-has-nurtured/#more-18685
Adjourned till tomorrow
It must be admitted that one of the striking things about the Labour-LD aministratio0ns in Scotland was how much money they had unspent at the end of the year. Mr Swinney has reportedly been far more rigorous. And the biggest single wastes were the Parliament building and the Trams -both Labour (with help from LDs and Tories for the latter).
Are we discovering today that charm, guile, engagement and the gift of the gab can take you an awful awful long way in politics - but that when it counts content and a coherent message may prevail?
Eck looking alot like the emperor with no clothes and whimpering, blustering, deflecting. You'd need a heart of stone not to laugh.
(People give a very serious shit about being bankrupted and laughing this stuff off is trite beyond belief. They are potentially days away from committing to becoming country with no money. WTF!).
If you look at the amount sterling moved yesterday, apparently largelo off the back of an opinion poll by survation, that's a potentially financiall rewarding way of getting a return from asking 1,000 people what they think about something.
I cant think of a time in living memory when advanced knowledge of polling data could have been as financiall lucrative as the lsat 48 hours and the next.
There isn't just massive liquidiity on Betfair - you could even use it to place big bets in (stake unlimited) financial markets...I wonder if hedge funds have been commissioning any private polling?
"Are you not worried about how your pension will be funded, or who will protect your savings?"
"No. Eck says all will be fine. Inshallah"
Emblems of affiliation. Repeated mantras. Adulation of the leader.
If there is a Yes, the followers are going to be very, very, very unhappy when the rapture doesn't arrive...
YouGov don't leak, they only send the poll to the client and no one else.
That said Rupert Murdoch's twitter feed is worth watching.
Calls are made via an automatic dialler, and they had already spoken to enough people over 65, so were only speaking to those of us under that age. The problem they must have is that this system works on land lines only, so the poor and young are hard to catch. Their system weights down people who have not voted in the last election by 50%, but they are clearly weighting for both the British and Scottish elections, since we were asked how we had voted in both of them. Quite how they handle folk like me who voted in 2010 but did not live in Scotland for the 2011 Scottish elections is anyone's guess.
Anyway, I was asked how sure I was to vote Yes, how sure I was to vote, and how I had voted in those two previous elections.
www.kenbell.info
Those heartless Tory bastards, the IFS... Oh, wait.
http://theconversation.com/scotland-will-not-be-offered-devo-max-after-a-no-vote-heres-why-31500
I could cash out now for a 6% profit but given that yesterday I was sitting on a 60% profit I fell there is still room.
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/iainmartin1/100285997/alex-salmond-is-starting-to-remind-me-of-fred-goodwin/
Oh, Alex...
The other kind of estate, for a change, in response to Mr Bond on the previous thread.
I would have thought a YouGov 58/42 for No would push Yes out to approx 7.
58/42 for No plus all the news re banks moving etc would surely just about finish it.
It seems at last some people are beginning to wake up to what's been going on in these areas
Areas with segregated, divided communities leading to civil strife...
Who knew? What could have been done?
Surely not...
"2. Between 2009-10 and 2015-16 spending on the NHS in England will, on currently announced plans, have risen by about 4% in real terms ....
3. Over the same period ..... Spending on the NHS in Scotland has fallen by 1%."
The thought of being rid of so many apparently embittered, ungrateful ingrates is comforting but they are only a fraction of the people in Scotland. What about the rest who do not want to be cut loose? Surely we have to stand by them and support them or it is not much of a union. Not all the YES voters will be the bitter, nasty Nats either. Many of them will be decent people who have been talked round, misled or just have some sort of dream. We need to offer them the other side of the argument, persuade them to change their mind.
Next - do not imagine that the effects will be limited to Scotland. We are entwined with them as a result of 300 years of integration and it is very difficult to untangle things. There will be severe economic impacts down here too. And what about emigration? What about those who are not encumbered with mortgages and just decide to leave and head south?
The situation is a shambles but it needs a better solution than throwing the baby out with the bath-water.
"The Scots are too stupid to rule themselves"
"The Scots are too poor to rule themselves"
"The Scots are too anti-English to rule themselves"
"HM The Queen will have a heart attack and die if the Scots vote yes"
"Scotland will immediately be consumed by the ocean if they vote yes"
"There will be all-out global thermonuclear war if the Scots vote yes"
"The Sun will go Nova and destroy the entire solar system if the Scots vote yes"
Er, you get the picture!
If you haven't seen it, go and find a shop and have a butcher's - it's on page 33.
Just need one last Yes lead to equalise green - otherwise has been a fun ride an a cheap bet.
Just had a guy into today who is so mad about Salmond he went and joined the Better Together campaign last night. He is male middle aged born in Scotland and Central Belt.
Another tidbit. Walking through Glasgow this morning on the way to a meeting and watched for 10 mins the Yes campaigner on the loud speaker in the main shopping street. He was ranting and raving about Thatcher and Falklands. In 10 mins he got not one person to pick up a leaflet. Everyone was ignoring him.
It is hard to say entirely as I don't spend time with the NEDs in Springburn but the general mood swing seems to be away from the YES and Salmond. Maybe the worst thing that could have happened to the SNP was that they got a single poll lead as it has woken up the No campaign.
58 No 42 Yes would end this as an event and the price would be 12 or more.
I think the ship has sailed though - NO probably is on a train ride to 1.01..
Price blocker ?
So we should get it tomorrow (fingers crossed)
But you have to register (free).
@TelePolitics: Alex Salmond goes to war with BBC over RBS 'leak' http://t.co/BaoLdEZ4nJ
11/09/2014 13:25
UKIP selects John Bickley to fight the Heywood and Middleton by-election. He previously fought Wythenshawe and Sale East.
I hope the commonsense prevails, but I fear that the damage that has been done will colour relations between Scotland and the rest of us for years to come.
So now everyone sees the marketing value of IndyPolls.
Matt is great for a one liner - but Brookes does super full colour caricatures
I see they're confirmed as moving too.
That's a biggie. Any idea how many customers they've got?
Do Sainsburys still do banking?
http://survation.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/Headline-Referenedum-Vote-Table.pdf
If Salmond doesn;t get independence, he will get big new powers anyway - which he can then sell as a victory
Its a win win for him.
http://www.thetimes.co.uk/tto/opinion/article2481811.ece
BluffingTipping PointThreads was about a nuclear war erupting over Communist incursion over the East/west German border, the main story was about the effect of a nuclear strike on Sheffield, and the fate of the characters. The Sheffield council were trapped in an underground bunker and by the time the army had a chance to dig them out, they had all died. It focused a lot on the breakdown of social order and later went into a rather wrongheaded dystopian future with Britain back to a pre industrial rev, agrarian society. Scary, but woefully inaccurate, too optimistic about the immediate term prospects and far too pessimistic about the long term future of survivors.
It is available on YouTube, broken into segments.
The Day After is a better film, or the 60s War Game which accurately reflects the ingrained ignorance of the time
BluffingTipping PointTo see what, ask yourself a question. Where does the mysterious lost money go?
http://willievass.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/110914-Rangers-training/G0000iGedT_2wAfA/I0000c0Eqcl.8b4A/C0000jsP5NTBBSW8/
"Rangers manager Ally McCoist displaying his support for the No campaign in the Scottish Referendum with a badge on his training shirt"
Whereas The Day After is a ground strike, so survivors are seen walking through the fallout and the associated horrific death from radiation sickness.
Which is insane.
That is, I entirely agree, not the same as money saved each year (which may or may not revert to the Treasury from Scotland: I am not sure if this is compulsory though it was certainly remitted under Labour-LDs.
So given how much they were upwighted an outlier level of No-ness amongst them would explain why both that group and Glasgow was so out of line with the rest of the polls.
If we are so "United" as a Kingdom, would you argue for a united UK football team and football league?
Here's another - given that the John Lewis CEO have suggested that their prices in Scotland will have to rise eventually because England subsidises their operations in further flung places then presumably that will apply to the Royal Mail. One price fitting all UK destinations will surely be no more.
Would be nice if you came clean before continuing to attack other posters.
Ladbrokes have Sturgeon at 1/2 but the rest of the list could make some good returns.
It also follows that, shorn of these subsidies, retailers would be able to cut prices in England.
Go Yes!
Spreadex have a proper vote% spreadbet market. Not the silly binary market offered by SPIN.
Come on Sporting, up yer game!
--
Spreadex Vote %:
Yes % SELL 45.5 - 47.5 BUY
No % SELL 52.5 - 54.5 BUY