Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » If the swing-back theorists are right the proportion of 201

13»

Comments

  • SmarmeronSmarmeron Posts: 5,099
    O/T, I just watched a clip from the "front line" in Iraq.
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-28889646
    In the latter part, no one seems particularly bothered about snipers, which is extremely odd.
  • volcanopetevolcanopete Posts: 2,078
    Charles said:

    Simply that most normal voters pay very little attention to politics until near the election (it's a gradually increasing trend over time, explaining why "swingback" is a gradual process).

    When they do pay attention, the government holds a lot of the cards - in terms of oxygen, agenda setting, ability to do stuff, perceived authority, etc.

    That's why divided parties (undermining authority) and competence /incompetence are what can kill governments.
    So "swingback" is a gradual process.Sounds like sex for the over 80s."Pullaway" could be occurring equally on the balance of probabilities.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,301
    jayfdee said:

    I suspect all political persuasions are guilty of the dog cr@p problem,round here they sometimes scoop it up in pink plastic bags and hang it on trees and fences.
    The local paper always has a letter from "Disgusted of ****" complaining of dog cr@p on the pavements,even takes priority of the trolls moaning about local councillors.
    Currently in Normandy,amazed at the phenominal achievement of D day.

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1236839/Solicitor-General-Vera-Baird-embroiled-row-failing-pick-dogs-mess-railway-station.html

    Even senior figures in a Labour Government have incontinent dogs.
This discussion has been closed.