politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » Another cross-over gets reversed – but could ICM, expected tonight, have a consecutive CON lead?
This could be a highly unusual polling day for the two firms to be reporting both had the Tories in the lead last time out. A couple of hours ago Populus online moved from a 1% CON lead on Friday to a 4% one now.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Mr. D, the only use of a polygraph, aside from as a doorstop, is to frighten stupid people into confessing.
Paedophiles, as mentioned in my linked piece, are phenomenally good liars. The polygraph will do more harm than good, because those who are reoffending may well fool the magic box of truthiness, and get a scientific seal of approval.
Mr. Max, I'm sorry to hear that, and agree that the Caliphate isn't merely a threat to Iraq and Syria or even the wider region, but to the world [I'm not saying it could conquer the world, merely that it will help to create more terrorism].
Mr. Eagles, yeah, we learnt a few ways at university. It's an absolute crock of shit.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Terriblel news indeed. My sympathies to you and your family.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Most shocking, sincere condolences to you and your family.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
Hence it’s use on the JK Show? (first possibility!)
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
England, Scotland and Wales together is what makes us Great.
"Great" is a geographical expression, to distinguish from Brittany.
Brittany is "Bretagne", while GB is "Grande Bretagne"
We're the rainy archipelago in the North Atlantic, that was Western Europe's only holdout against the Nazis, we're the lot who set up a benign Empire on which the sun never set on.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Maliki seems to be willing to sacrifice his country to try and save his premiership. Does he think ISIS will let him stay PM?
The US want Maliki out because he isn't anti-Iran enough. Everything happening in Iraq is about the Russia-Syria-Iran vs America-Saudi-Gulf (+Turks as wild card) regional conflict that was started by the implosion of Iraq using factions inside Iraq and Syria as proxies.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Thanks for the condolences, we've been advised not to travel for the funeral because of the terrorist threat so my grandfather is going to hold a memorial here. My mum just told me he was a doctor and decided to stay in Kenya after everyone left because he felt people there needed his services more than they would in the UK.
The Kenyan government needs to get a handle on Boko Haram. They are just randomly killing people with no set agenda.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
Hence it’s use on the JK Show? (first possibility!)
Yeah. Consistency doesn't mean 100% - which is why it shouldn't be used as evidence. It includes margin of error.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
Not sure how you can consistently get a result which depends on something? Do you mean irrespective of the number asked?
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
You really shouldn't talk about topics you don't know about.
A quick google about False memory recall and manipulation thereof using language might educate you
But I'll make a prediction, you thought the Banksta did the stabbing.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
You really shouldn't talk about topics you don't know about.
A quick google about False memory recall and manipulation thereof using language might educate you
But I'll make a prediction, you thought the Banksta did the stabbing.
If it can't be used as evidence there's no incentive to using manipulating language. You'd want the test as clean as possible.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
Not sure how you can consistently get a result which depends on something? Do you mean irrespective of the number asked?
Using probability. It specifically (edit: depends) on the number asked.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
Not sure how you can consistently get a result which depends on something? Do you mean irrespective of the number asked?
Using probability. It specifically (edit: depends) on the number asked.
I think you'll have to break it down further (just woke up so brain not fully engaged). You are saying you consistently get the right answer, therefore it shouldn't depend at all on how many people you ask?
"Alex Salmond's failure to be honest with Scots about his Plan B on currency is costing him votes. It's clear that the momentum in this campaign is with those of us who believe the brightest future for Scotland is to remain part of the UK.
"Alex Salmond wants us to take a leap into the unknown with independence. He wants us to take a huge risk with the future of our country. Yet he can't tell us what money our wages, pensions and benefits would be paid in.
"He can't say what currency we would use to invest in our schools and hospitals. And he can't be clear about what money we would be paying our supermarket and energy bills in."
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
You really shouldn't talk about topics you don't know about.
A quick google about False memory recall and manipulation thereof using language might educate you
But I'll make a prediction, you thought the Banksta did the stabbing.
If it can't be used as evidence there's no incentive to using manipulating language. You'd want the test as clean as possible.
Again, showing your lack of understanding.
The manipulation doesn't have to be deliberate, it can be accidental.
For example, people wrongly interchange the charge manslaughter with murder.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
Not sure how you can consistently get a result which depends on something? Do you mean irrespective of the number asked?
Using probability. It specifically (edit: depends) on the number asked.
I think you'll have to break it down further (just woke up so brain not fully engaged). You are saying you consistently get the right answer, therefore it shouldn't depend at all on how many people you ask?
The opposite. Probability consistently working depends on sample size.
Mr. Jones, but the polygraph doesn't work. If its random whirrings spew out multiple wrong answers that would implicate an innocent man of crime, or seem to exonerate a guilty party.
It's like suggesting we use a Magic 8 Ball when interrogating suspects.
Thanks for the condolences, we've been advised not to travel for the funeral because of the terrorist threat so my grandfather is going to hold a memorial here. My mum just told me he was a doctor and decided to stay in Kenya after everyone left because he felt people there needed his services more than they would in the UK.
The Kenyan government needs to get a handle on Boko Haram. They are just randomly killing people with no set agenda.
It must be getting worse for your family! Dreadful.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
You really shouldn't talk about topics you don't know about.
A quick google about False memory recall and manipulation thereof using language might educate you
But I'll make a prediction, you thought the Banksta did the stabbing.
If it can't be used as evidence there's no incentive to using manipulating language. You'd want the test as clean as possible.
Again, showing your lack of understanding.
The manipulation doesn't have to be deliberate, it can be accidental.
For example, people wrongly interchange the charge manslaughter with murder.
Or loose definitions of crimes.
Fair enough however if it can't be used as evidence then the *incentive* is for it to be as clean as possible.
If anyone thinks that Islamic extremism isn't a threat to normal people think again. My father just received some terrible news, his uncle has been shot dead in Nairobi by Islamists while driving home. He was in his own car and posed no threat to anyone. He was a good man and though I only met him a few times when he came here for weddings or when I went there on holiday, he will be missed. Such a waste of life.
Condolences Max. He sounds like he was a good man, trying to do a good thing.
Here's one example of how rubbish and easy to get the wrong result on a lie detector, in a rape investigation, involving Mr X who is not guilty of anything in his life.
Interviewer: Mr X do you think, it is wrong, possibly rape, to sleep with a drunk woman
Mr X: Yes
Mr X, then remembers the time he was 22 and slept with a very drunk girl, his heart rate then elevates, then he remembers he was also very drunk at the time.
Interviewer notes the increase in the heart rate and the sweats.
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
We're The Conservative and Unionist Party of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much as having a threesome on your own.
Dumbass Tories LOL!
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
Mr. Jones, but the polygraph doesn't work. If its random whirrings spew out multiple wrong answers that would implicate an innocent man of crime, or seem to exonerate a guilty party.
It's like suggesting we use a Magic 8 Ball when interrogating suspects.
According to QI (IIRC) Aborigine witch doctors use a magic finger bone. Works fine.
Like I say, not well enough for evidence but I can see certain situations where it could be used in investigations.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
Jezza Kyle told me they were right !
What about Sharon Stone in Basic Instinct? She was able to fool the lie detector!
Here's one example of how rubbish and easy to get the wrong result on a lie detector, in a rape investigation, involving Mr X who is not guilty of anything in his life.
Interviewer: Mr X do you think, it is wrong, possibly rape, to sleep with a drunk woman
Mr X: Yes
Mr X, then remembers the time he was 22 and slept with a very drunk girl, his heart rate then elevates, then he remembers he was also very drunk at the time.
Interviewer notes the increase in the heart rate and the sweats.
If you both sleep, what does it matter? What does it say in Macbeth about drink? Lechery, Sir, it preventeth!
Here's one example of how rubbish and easy to get the wrong result on a lie detector, in a rape investigation, involving Mr X who is not guilty of anything in his life.
Interviewer: Mr X do you think, it is wrong, possibly rape, to sleep with a drunk woman
Mr X: Yes
Mr X, then remembers the time he was 22 and slept with a very drunk girl, his heart rate then elevates, then he remembers he was also very drunk at the time.
Interviewer notes the increase in the heart rate and the sweats.
100% agree. You're thinking about suspects. I'm thinking about witnesses.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
You really shouldn't talk about topics you don't know about.
A quick google about False memory recall and manipulation thereof using language might educate you
But I'll make a prediction, you thought the Banksta did the stabbing.
If it can't be used as evidence there's no incentive to using manipulating language. You'd want the test as clean as possible.
Again, showing your lack of understanding.
The manipulation doesn't have to be deliberate, it can be accidental.
For example, people wrongly interchange the charge manslaughter with murder.
Or loose definitions of crimes.
Fair enough however if it can't be used as evidence then the *incentive* is for it to be as clean as possible.
How accurate is it when your job depends on it as is the case with a lot of American government jobs.
Agreed, if it is not admissible in court, I can't see how they can use it.
I think it could be quite useful in investigations e.g. when people are scared of someone they know did something. Not as evidence though as it only works consistently on people who are dumb or naturally honest.
No it does not.
If you had someone stabbed with a lot of witnesses but none of them wanted to say who did it and you asked them individually on a lie detector if x or y did it then you would consistently get the right answer depending on the number asked.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
You really shouldn't talk about topics you don't know about.
A quick google about False memory recall and manipulation thereof using language might educate you
But I'll make a prediction, you thought the Banksta did the stabbing.
If it can't be used as evidence there's no incentive to using manipulating language. You'd want the test as clean as possible.
Again, showing your lack of understanding.
The manipulation doesn't have to be deliberate, it can be accidental.
For example, people wrongly interchange the charge manslaughter with murder.
Or loose definitions of crimes.
Fair enough however if it can't be used as evidence then the *incentive* is for it to be as clean as possible.
How accurate is it when your job depends on it as is the case with a lot of American government jobs.
I'm talking about specific situations like where there's been a stabbing or a shooting on a housing estate with lots of witnesses but no-one will say.
King Cole, isn't it more that wine provoketh the desire and unprovoketh the performance?
Just looked it up, and you are right. Mind it’s 60 years since I had to study the Scottish Play. And, sadly, I’ve no opportunity nowadays to test the veracity of the statement!
Comments
A week on Wednesday we have the next round of marginals polling including the one for Bedford where my wife, Jacky, was sampled.
Tory lead once the indyref is concluded.
Edit: Sunil in 3...2...1....
Just to remind all, there are 40+ seats for Labour in Scotland, only a handful possible for the Tories.
Lie detector tests introduced to monitor released sex offenders
Tests compulsory on high-risk sex offenders let out on licence, as handful of officers trained to operate polygraph machines
http://www.theguardian.com/society/2014/aug/08/lie-detector-polygraph-tests-introduced-monitor-sex-offenders
https://translate.google.co.uk/
"And how are we going to define a cross-over?"
Given how much you bang on about it ;-)
Winning without Scotland in the UK will be as much fun as having a threesome on your own.
The "Unionist" bit refers to the UNION with IRELAND, not SCOTLAND!
Today's Tory party came about in 1912 through merger of the Liberal Unionist and Conservative Parties over the question of Irish Home Rule. The LU's broke with the Liberals in 1886.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Liberal_Unionist_Party
Surely you mean Cameronu Mubarak!
England, Scotland and Wales together is what makes us Great.
It's a solution that makes everyone a winner.
We have a united Ireland and Northern Ireland still remains in the Union.
Mr. Eagles, the increasing use of the polygraph is depressing. It's about as scientifically valuable as astrology.
http://thaddeusthesixth.blogspot.co.uk/2014/05/the-polygraph-work-of-science-fiction.html
Paedophiles, as mentioned in my linked piece, are phenomenally good liars. The polygraph will do more harm than good, because those who are reoffending may well fool the magic box of truthiness, and get a scientific seal of approval.
Mr. Eagles, yeah, we learnt a few ways at university. It's an absolute crock of shit.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/2014/08/11/ed-miliband-labour-policy-grassroots-criticism_n_5667341.html?1407762702
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-28739975
Maliki seems to be willing to sacrifice his country to try and save his premiership. Does he think ISIS will let him stay PM?
Brittany is "Bretagne", while GB is "Grande Bretagne"
RepublicCommonwealth?That's two of the many reasons why we're great.
The Kenyan government needs to get a handle on Boko Haram. They are just randomly killing people with no set agenda.
I agree it shouldn't be evidence.
It seems almost all the news now is about extremist religious lunatics doing terrible things.
"India is a geographical term. It is no more a united nation than the Equator."
WSC
A quick google about False memory recall and manipulation thereof using language might educate you
But I'll make a prediction, you thought the Banksta did the stabbing.
And it neglects the most important attribute of the polygraph: it doesn't bloody work.
Condolences Max. Such a waste.
We are indeed fortunate where and when we live.
2) Probability works on sample size
The manipulation doesn't have to be deliberate, it can be accidental.
For example, people wrongly interchange the charge manslaughter with murder.
Or loose definitions of crimes.
It's like suggesting we use a Magic 8 Ball when interrogating suspects.
Photography in Gaelic is a v long word!
Fair enough however if it can't be used as evidence then the *incentive* is for it to be as clean as possible.
Does appearing on Countdown count as false memory recall?
Or someone saying they were bisexual only a few years ago and now say they are heterosexual?
Interviewer: Mr X do you think, it is wrong, possibly rape, to sleep with a drunk woman
Mr X: Yes
Mr X, then remembers the time he was 22 and slept with a very drunk girl, his heart rate then elevates, then he remembers he was also very drunk at the time.
Interviewer notes the increase in the heart rate and the sweats.
Like I say, not well enough for evidence but I can see certain situations where it could be used in investigations.
Wonder what'll happen if the Tories in opposition after the next election take a poll lead.
Will the PB Hodge poll analyst extraordinaires bang on endlessly for years about "Crossover" and "Swingback" (Always happens, inevitable, blah blah)?
#CrossOverMonday ?
Or
#CrossBackMonday ?
Either way it's certainly #MegaPollingMonday
I think his "by-election swingback" model is showing a Labour seat win at the moment though...