Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » After a year of edging down LAB is starting to move upwards

SystemSystem Posts: 12,213
edited June 2014 in General

politicalbetting.com » Blog Archive » After a year of edging down LAB is starting to move upwards

As I’ve written many times before there are so many YouGov polls (five or six a week) that looking at averages is the best way of observing the trend. Thankfully the firm is making the calculations and is now publishing them. I used to attempt this task myself!

Read the full story here


«13

Comments

  • First .... again!
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708
    Seems like a Euros effect on the Lab share, doesn't it?
  • I'm struggling to find that latest Con 32% vs Lab 38% YouGov poll to which Mike refers, but it's certainly another deeply disappointing one for the Blues. Maybe it reflects an increase in the nation's "feel bad" factor following England's dismal failure in the World Cup as I suggested recently, in which case this aspect may recede as the sense of disappointment lessens.
  • woody662woody662 Posts: 255
    The Conservatives had a 17 point lead on the 21st June 2009. Puts these tiny Labour leads into a bit of context. Lets also remember that normal people out there don't really think about the general election on a daily basis. At some point early next year they will give some thought as to whether they stick with the posh but generally inoffensive and competent fella we've got who at least does not look out of place on the world stage or risk a whiny weirdo who cannot competently eat a bacon sandwich!!
  • Stuart_DicksonStuart_Dickson Posts: 3,557
    A POLL conducted by Scotland's leading Asian radio station has shown firm support for independence, with the Yes camp ahead by 20%.
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956
    edited June 2014
    Sorry to go off topic so early with this betting opportunity.

    Yesterday, I suggested that PBers might like to consider taking SkyBet's 6/4 against Suarez leaving Liverpool during the summer transfer window ..... citing his anti-English rant after he scored two goals for Uraguay against our lot last Thursday.

    Well, this idea appears supported by this story in today's Sunday Times:

    "LUIS SUAREZ will shock Liverpool in the summer by insisting he wants to leave Anfield for a new career in Spain. Real Madrid and Barcelona have approached England’s Footballer of the Year and are ready to meet a release clause understood to be £67.9m"

    Since my post yesterday, the odds against the player's imminent departure have shortened from 6/4 to 6/5, but still value if you believe as I do that this is going to happen.

    As ever, DYOR.

  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Surprised that this surge wasn't reflected in the Euros..
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jun/21/neil-kinnock-ed-miliband-2015

    Neil Kinnock defends Ed Miliband against 'vindictive agenda' of critics
    Labour party told leader 'has courage to fight hostile media', as other senior figures warn it could be out of power for 15 years
  • Sorry to go off topic so early with this betting opportunity.

    Yesterday, I suggested that PBers might like to consider taking SkyBet's 6/4 against Suarez leaving Liverpool during the summer transfer window ..... citing his anti-English rant after he scored two goals for Uraguay against our lot last Thursday.

    Well, this idea appears supported by this story in today's Sunday Times:

    "LUIS SUAREZ will shock Liverpool in the summer by insisting he wants to leave Anfield for a new career in Spain. Real Madrid and Barcelona have approached England’s Footballer of the Year and are ready to meet a release clause understood to be £67.9m"

    Since my post yesterday, the odds against the player's imminent departure have shortened from 6/4 to 6/5, but still value if you believe as I do that this is going to happen.

    As ever, DYOR.

    Yes, this story is strengthened by similar headlines in today's Mail on Sunday:

    "Luis Suarez will spark £100MILLION tussle between Real Madrid and Barcelona as Liverpool struggle to hold on to star man"

  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    As I indicated before the recent elections Labour would enjoy a small post poll bounce as once again voters attention is diverted away from politics. In the coming months the recent and overall year on year trend of Labour slippage will play out.

    We are likely to see more individual crossover polls as the year progresses but I don't expect them to become a more consistent and regular feature until the new year. One essential that will not change is that :

    Ed Miliband Will Never Become Prime Minister
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Todays You Gov LAB 363 CON 240 LD 21 Other 26 (UKPR)

    Ed is crap is PM 10.5 months to go.

    Every poll in June would have Ed is crap is PM.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Big Johns OWL vs Jack's ARSE.

    Something has to give...
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,703
    Has anyone, apart possibly from Matthew Oakeshott, asked whether the LD vote overall would be higher with a different leader?
    Doesn’t matter who. Just not Nick Clegg!

    Or have things gone too far?
  • peter_from_putneypeter_from_putney Posts: 6,956
    edited June 2014

    Todays You Gov LAB 363 CON 240 LD 21 Other 26 (UKPR)

    Ed is crap is PM 10.5 months to go.

    Every poll in June would have Ed is crap is PM.

    Please would you provide the link to UKPR showing this seat allocation - their latest poll average I can find shows Labour winning a 30 seat majority, consistent with them winning 340 seats.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Todays YG has LAB 38 CON 32 LD 8

    http://ukpollingreport.co.uk/swing-calculator

    on those % gives 363/240/21.

    In fact every poll this month including the tight ICM one gives a Lab maj on this swingometer
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,937
    TGOHF said:

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jun/21/neil-kinnock-ed-miliband-2015

    Neil Kinnock defends Ed Miliband against 'vindictive agenda' of critics
    Labour party told leader 'has courage to fight hostile media', as other senior figures warn it could be out of power for 15 years

    The courage to fight hostile media by being photoed holding up a copy of The Sun, Mr Kinnock?

    Once again, heap thanks upon John Major for preventing that idiot from ever getting into Number 10.
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,937
    TGOHF said:

    Big Johns OWL vs Jack's ARSE.

    Something has to give...

    This week has shown us that Labour doesn't deliver on the promise of OWLS....

  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    TGOHF said:

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jun/21/neil-kinnock-ed-miliband-2015

    Neil Kinnock defends Ed Miliband against 'vindictive agenda' of critics
    Labour party told leader 'has courage to fight hostile media', as other senior figures warn it could be out of power for 15 years

    As TSE commented on last night - "The most interesting thing is the recent Ed is crap stuff is coming from Labour, such as that Guardian article saying Ed won't be able to do a Kinnock and carry on after a first defeat.""

    Also, the majority of these "hostile" articles appearing in the media recently are based entirely on Ed's dire personal ratings - Kinnoch would be more accurate if he accused those voters being polled as having the 'vindictive agenda'.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Mail have a leaked Labour strategy paper..

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2664767/Our-weaknesses-benefits-borrowing-migrants-cost-Election-admits-Red-Ed-former-close-aide-turns-him.html

    A Labour document obtained by The Mail on Sunday suggests that he has also given up hope of winning over new supporters.
    Instead he is pinning his hopes on ‘shoring up’ Labour’s traditional working-class vote and declaring his own class war by smearing the ‘toxic Tories’ as rich and out of touch.
    The damaging disclosures are contained in a leaked copy of Labour’s General Election strategy sent to all Labour shadow cabinet ministers.
    Headed Political Strategy To 2015, it sets out how Mr Miliband plans to win power. But it also confirms claims by Labour MPs that the party faces an uphill struggle because voters find Mr Miliband and his views a big turn-off.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    TGOHF said:

    Big Johns OWL vs Jack's ARSE.

    Something has to give...

    Sadly @bigjohnowls only hoots the same tune - Ed is ahead with less than a year left and Mrs Ed should get her tape measure out for the curtains in Downing Street.

    Sadly for our t'wit-a-woo regular the history of most recent duff prospective Labour PM this period out from a general election is awful.

    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.

    https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AonYZs4MzlZbcGhOdG0zTG1EWkVPOEY3OXRmOEIwZmc#gid=0

  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    The polls are going Labour's way because Ed's a disaster. Or something.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496

    TGOHF said:

    Big Johns OWL vs Jack's ARSE.

    Something has to give...

    This week has shown us that Labour doesn't deliver on the promise of OWLS....

    Has also shown you only get what you would expect from an ARSE
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    TGOHF said:

    Big Johns OWL vs Jack's ARSE.

    Something has to give...

    Two different things JackW is a 2015 forecast. I am simply showing what every poll that is published means in terms of seats using UKPR UNS swingometer.

    JackW states with complete certainty that Ed Milliband will never be PM. Betfair still thinks Lab most seats so i reckon just over a 50% chance he will.

    We shall see.

    Interesting 10.5 months
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT ****

    Do not feed the troll @malcolmg
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,704
    edited June 2014
    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
  • TGOHFTGOHF Posts: 21,633
    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
    1983 is the one to compare with – blue govt has had only one term to turn around a Labour economic FUBAR.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,703
    Had the LD’s gone with confidence and supply instead of Coalition, I suspect Cameron wouldn’t have brought in regular elections but copied Wilson in 1974, that is gone as far as possible for populist policies (e.g. no NHS reform), then asked for a dissolution in the early part of 2011. He’d have won then and where would we be now?
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    Melbourne Demons +14.5 is my current bet.

    Ed as PM still not sure just providing current polling updates.

    JackW is certain of the outcome 11 months out
  • FinancierFinancier Posts: 3,916
    Since EU14, the Labour VI has gone up a little because the 2010 LDs have on average been losing more of their VI to Labour as well as to UKIP and the Greens.

    Labour appears to have got over its EU14 UKIP hiccup but the Cons are still suffering and so their VI is down a bit.
  • AlastairMeeksAlastairMeeks Posts: 30,340
    Morning all, I've completed the set of battlegrounds by having a look at the Lib Dem position:

    http://newstonoone.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/the-lib-dem-battleground-in-june-2014.html
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    There has undoubtedly been a Labour recovery in the last couple of weeks. The interesting question is why. It has been accompanied by a collapse of Eds personal ratings and a fairly intense media attack along with some infighting which shows there is nothing like the new Labour enforcers scaring people into line. This makes it all the more curious as does the fact that the news on the economy is so consistently good it almost gets boring.

    My guess is that the Tory campaigning got people to focus on areas where Labour was particularly weak such as immigration and the EU and attention has again drifted to the fact the majority see nothing for them in this economic miracle. The Tories need some real wage growth this year to share the gains around a bit. Whether they will get enough of that is hard to say. I suspect that the increases for most will be too modest to be noticed, especially after such a long period of falling real wages. Mike's Tories most votes, Labour most seats bet looks better and better to me.
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,704
    TGOHF said:


    1983 is the one to compare with – blue govt has had only one term to turn around a Labour economic FUBAR.

    You're missing two key ingredients Thatcher as PM and the SDP.

    1979 is probably the closest parallel.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    edited June 2014
    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 elections then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    The really important question of the day is whether Prior and the England tail can get another 100 runs for the last 4 wickets. Against this attack I would like to think the answer is Yes (unlike in Scotland of course).
  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,937
    TGOHF said:

    Mail have a leaked Labour strategy paper..

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2664767/Our-weaknesses-benefits-borrowing-migrants-cost-Election-admits-Red-Ed-former-close-aide-turns-him.html

    A Labour document obtained by The Mail on Sunday suggests that he has also given up hope of winning over new supporters.
    Instead he is pinning his hopes on ‘shoring up’ Labour’s traditional working-class vote and declaring his own class war by smearing the ‘toxic Tories’ as rich and out of touch.
    The damaging disclosures are contained in a leaked copy of Labour’s General Election strategy sent to all Labour shadow cabinet ministers.
    Headed Political Strategy To 2015, it sets out how Mr Miliband plans to win power. But it also confirms claims by Labour MPs that the party faces an uphill struggle because voters find Mr Miliband and his views a big turn-off.

    Interesting that Labour are going to be winning power on:

    - living standards crisis
    - youth unemployment
    - NHS in crisis
    - the top running away with it

    Yet, what policies do they have to define these areas? Ain't happening.

    I suspect that unemployment is going to be an election horror show for Labour, with constituency-by-constituency stats showing the before (Labour) and after (Coalition) on unemployment.

    Labour, the party for unemployment; the Coalition delivering work for the workers.....

    On the NHS - didn't Ed tell us it was going to die about three years ago? The dead on trolleys in the street and all that? It looks more and more as if Labour's election campaign will be reduced to Making Shit Up.

  • CD13CD13 Posts: 6,366
    The slight tick up in Labour's fortunes could be due to them talking tougher on welfare and on immigration. It's causing some consternation on Labour List but it will be electorally useful.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    edited June 2014
    SunTimes/YouGov poll

    Asked who has been the best Labour leader only 2% name Miliband, half as many as for Neil Kinnock, the loser of the 1992 election, and just 1% ahead of Michael Foot, who was beaten by a landslide in 1983.

    To some extent the story is a familiar one, of Miliband suffering low personal ratings. Our survey goes further. It finds widespread disappointment among Labour’s own supporters:

    • More Labour voters regard him as weak than strong

    • One in three don’t think he is up to the job of prime minister

    • Half of them think Labour would do better with a different leader
  • JonathanJonathan Posts: 21,704
    JackW said:

    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

    Why do you insist on pretending that Ed has to overturn a 100+ seat majority? I know you don't like him, but the reality is Ed is in quite a different position.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    CD13 said:

    The slight tick up in Labour's fortunes could be due to them talking tougher on welfare and on immigration. It's causing some consternation on Labour List but it will be electorally useful.

    If you want tough benefit reform you don't vote Labour. Frustration that growth is not making the vast majority better off and the perception that all the gains must be going to the better off is Labour's key attack point. Most of the growth is in fact going to narrowing the gap between what we pay ourselves and what we earn and unfortunately we need to do a lot more of that for quite a while yet but that is not the perception. A cooling in the London housing market and fewer stories of the rich getting richer on a housing boom would help the government too.

  • MarqueeMarkMarqueeMark Posts: 52,937
    JackW said:

    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 elections then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

    At least Gordon Brown had a line on the economy. He had Saved The World, if you remember. And some people bought this line.

    Set against the two Eds, Gordon looks like an economic Colossus striding across the world stage. If UKIP can stay relevant to next May, it is not at all fanciful to propose that Labour could poll a lower % share than in 2010. Although my own take is they will be up, but perhaps by not much more than a point.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,703
    Jonathan said:

    TGOHF said:


    1983 is the one to compare with – blue govt has had only one term to turn around a Labour economic FUBAR.

    You're missing two key ingredients Thatcher as PM and the SDP.

    1979 is probably the closest parallel.
    SDP = UKIP.

    But on the Right, as opposed to the Left!

    And Thatcher was only popular (if she was .... the Tories lost votes, didn’t they?) because of the Falklands. Where’s Cameron’s military (or any other) success?
  • Paul_Mid_BedsPaul_Mid_Beds Posts: 1,409
    woody662 said:

    The Conservatives had a 17 point lead on the 21st June 2009. Puts these tiny Labour leads into a bit of context. Lets also remember that normal people out there don't really think about the general election on a daily basis. At some point early next year they will give some thought as to whether they stick with the posh but generally inoffensive and competent fella we've got who at least does not look out of place on the world stage or risk a whiny weirdo who cannot competently eat a bacon sandwich!!

    This is doubly so this time with the fixed parliaments act everyone knows there will not be an election until next May. When that poll was done Brown could have gone to the queen for a dissolution at any time.

    Therefore people will continue to use opinion polls to kick the government until far later in the electoral cycle than usual, Labour really are in trouble, especially with the libdem collapse eroding the electoral system "bias" in their favour.
  • Edin_RokzEdin_Rokz Posts: 516
    Er! When is the Con/UKIP cross over due? Just want to put my tuppence on >;^)
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    edited June 2014

    Jonathan said:

    TGOHF said:


    1983 is the one to compare with – blue govt has had only one term to turn around a Labour economic FUBAR.

    You're missing two key ingredients Thatcher as PM and the SDP.

    1979 is probably the closest parallel.
    SDP = UKIP.

    But on the Right, as opposed to the Left!

    And Thatcher was only popular (if she was .... the Tories lost votes, didn’t they?) because of the Falklands. Where’s Cameron’s military (or any other) success?
    1983 wasn't' just the Conservatives being popular, it was also Labour not being an option, "the longest suicide note…"
  • antifrank said:

    Morning all, I've completed the set of battlegrounds by having a look at the Lib Dem position:

    http://newstonoone.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/the-lib-dem-battleground-in-june-2014.html

    Good work and your conclusions correspond with Ladbrokes' band of 31-40 seats for the LibDems, which is their shortest priced at just 7/4.
  • DecrepitJohnLDecrepitJohnL Posts: 13,300
    New graduates will be hitting the (admittedly healthier) employment market round about now. Student debt might make them less likely to favour Conservatives or (especially) LibDems.
  • JackW said:

    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 elections then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

    At least Gordon Brown had a line on the economy. He had Saved The World, if you remember. And some people bought this line.

    Set against the two Eds, Gordon looks like an economic Colossus striding across the world stage. If UKIP can stay relevant to next May, it is not at all fanciful to propose that Labour could poll a lower % share than in 2010. Although my own take is they will be up, but perhaps by not much more than a point.

    IIRC correctly, Brown only "Saved the World" for about 5 seconds .... the time it took to correct himself at an hilarious PMQs.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    edited June 2014
    Jonathan said:

    TGOHF said:


    1983 is the one to compare with – blue govt has had only one term to turn around a Labour economic FUBAR.

    You're missing two key ingredients Thatcher as PM and the SDP.

    1979 is probably the closest parallel.
    1979 was a change election where an exhausted and frankly bewildered government was chucked out for a radical change of direction because something had to be done. The next government will be doing exactly the same as this one: desperately trying and largely failing to eliminate a truly scary deficit without hurting too many people. I really can't see the similarity at all.

  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:

    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

    Why do you insist on pretending that Ed has to overturn a 100+ seat majority? I know you don't like him, but the reality is Ed is in quite a different position.
    I'm not pretending about the numbers. I know them just fine.

    However the fact remains that this close to the GE there is no historical or likely scenario that places Ed in Downing Street.

    You also indicate that I "don't like him" - Ed. This is not true. Ed Miliband is a perfectly decent chap and on a personal basis I'm sure we'd get on fine. But political reality is different and harsh - he is a weak leader, seen as such by a huge majority of voters, including a substantial section of Labour supporters. Worse, the public perception is growing that he's "weird" - this is especially dangerous for Labour.

    Neither am I partisan in the opprobrium I pour on political leaders. Here and outwith of PB I've commented vociferously that Hague, IDS and Howard would significantly fail to become PM. And words failed me on the miserable drunken "leadership" of Charles Kennedy who let himself and his party down by his overly close attachment to the bottle.

    I used to be heavily criticized by Conservatives on PB. Now it is Labour. I dump on politicians as an equal opportunity realist. I call it as I see it. Take it or leave it.

    JackW will not be for turning ....

    I recall that phrase from somewhere ....

  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    Jonathan said:

    TGOHF said:


    1983 is the one to compare with – blue govt has had only one term to turn around a Labour economic FUBAR.

    You're missing two key ingredients Thatcher as PM and the SDP.

    1979 is probably the closest parallel.
    It feels more like 2001, Labour and the Conservative both look clueless. In 2001 turnout fell, 2015 has the rise of UKIP as an extra factor.

    http://www.ukpolitical.info/Turnout45.htm
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    JackW said:

    TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT ****

    Do not feed the troll @malcolmg

    Typical unionist , no sense of humour unless it is them giving it out. Sad git.
    Why not crack one of your great jokes and have us all laughing in the aisles.
  • Paul_Mid_BedsPaul_Mid_Beds Posts: 1,409
    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:

    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

    Why do you insist on pretending that Ed has to overturn a 100+ seat majority? I know you don't like him, but the reality is Ed is in quite a different position.
    Er he pretty well does have to overturn a 1987esque majority? Labour only have 29 more seats than they won in 1987 and the coalition majority is 76. add in a green and three extra SNP MPs , four extra non sitting SF MPs replacing labour friendly SDLPs and 8 of the UUP MPs being replaced by more right wing DUP MPs and the scale of Milibands task is similar to Kinnocks.
  • asjohnstoneasjohnstone Posts: 1,276
    The UKIP numbers at 12% - 14 % must scare the crap out of Labour, they'll be badly pressed in the run up and a large amount of these votes will go tory.
  • GadflyGadfly Posts: 1,191
    PBers may recall that prior to the last general election I produced charts depicting the moving averages of the YouGov polls. I feel that these rule out a lot of the noise, and have been running the same exercise since the start of this year

    Here is the 5-poll moving average.
    http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae304/Gadfly_bucket/5poll.jpg

    Here is the 10-poll moving average.
    http://i982.photobucket.com/albums/ae304/Gadfly_bucket/10poll.jpg
  • Paul_Mid_BedsPaul_Mid_Beds Posts: 1,409
    edited June 2014
    DavidL said:

    There has undoubtedly been a Labour recovery in the last couple of weeks. The interesting question is why. It has been accompanied by a collapse of Eds personal ratings and a fairly intense media attack along with some infighting which shows there is nothing like the new Labour enforcers scaring people into line. This makes it all the more curious as does the fact that the news on the economy is so consistently good it almost gets boring.

    My guess is that the Tory campaigning got people to focus on areas where Labour was particularly weak such as immigration and the EU and attention has again drifted to the fact the majority see nothing for them in this economic miracle. The Tories need some real wage growth this year to share the gains around a bit. Whether they will get enough of that is hard to say. I suspect that the increases for most will be too modest to be noticed, especially after such a long period of falling real wages. Mike's Tories most votes, Labour most seats bet looks better and better to me.

    Labours recovery is nothing more than voters unwinding from election mode where they actually decide something, to going back to using opinion polls to kick the incumbent, safe in the knowledge that due to the fixed term parliament act the election is a year away.

    Next year they will focus on who they are actually choosing and Miliband, Balls, Harman and co with Brown still lurking on the backbenches are about as attractive a choice as Hague and Widdy were in 2001.
  • SimonStClareSimonStClare Posts: 7,976
    SunTimes/YouGov poll

    Just 21% think Ed Miliband is “up to the job” of running the country while 60% do not .

    Some 46% of voters and 49% of Labour supporters say the party would be more likely to win the next election with someone else in charge.

    Just 14% think Ed Miliband “looks and sounds like a prime minister” but 70% disagree.
  • Paul_Mid_BedsPaul_Mid_Beds Posts: 1,409
    edited June 2014
    TGOHF said:

    Mail have a leaked Labour strategy paper..

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2664767/Our-weaknesses-benefits-borrowing-migrants-cost-Election-admits-Red-Ed-former-close-aide-turns-him.html

    A Labour document obtained by The Mail on Sunday suggests that he has also given up hope of winning over new supporters.
    Instead he is pinning his hopes on ‘shoring up’ Labour’s traditional working-class vote.."

    Isn't that Hagues 2001 strategy in reverse. Thats a circle the wagons strategy for avoiding losing what you have not gaining more.

  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT ****

    Do not feed the troll @malcolmg
  • antifrank said:

    Morning all, I've completed the set of battlegrounds by having a look at the Lib Dem position:
    http://newstonoone.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/the-lib-dem-battleground-in-june-2014.html

    The graph at the top shows a drop of 2% (one fifth) in the LD share since March. The LDs are hitting "all time lows" just under a year from the GE. By contrast the same 2% drop in the C support is a drop of less than one tenth.
  • Great stuff Gadfly and a most useful tool - hopefully you'll keep these going until the GE.
  • SunTimes/YouGov poll
    Just 21% think Ed Miliband is “up to the job” of running the country while 60% do not .
    Some 46% of voters and 49% of Labour supporters say the party would be more likely to win the next election with someone else in charge.
    Just 14% think Ed Miliband “looks and sounds like a prime minister” but 70% disagree.

    I think Ed M is doing a great job as Labour Leader, that is from my perspective.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014

    DavidL said:

    There has undoubtedly been a Labour recovery in the last couple of weeks. The interesting question is why. It has been accompanied by a collapse of Eds personal ratings and a fairly intense media attack along with some infighting which shows there is nothing like the new Labour enforcers scaring people into line. This makes it all the more curious as does the fact that the news on the economy is so consistently good it almost gets boring.

    My guess is that the Tory campaigning got people to focus on areas where Labour was particularly weak such as immigration and the EU and attention has again drifted to the fact the majority see nothing for them in this economic miracle. The Tories need some real wage growth this year to share the gains around a bit. Whether they will get enough of that is hard to say. I suspect that the increases for most will be too modest to be noticed, especially after such a long period of falling real wages. Mike's Tories most votes, Labour most seats bet looks better and better to me.

    Labours recovery is nothing more than voters unwinding from election mode where they actually decide something, to going back to using opinion polls to kick the incumbent, safe in the knowledge that due to the fixed term parliament act the election is a year away.

    Next year they will focus on who they are actually choosing and Miliband, Balls, Harman and co with Brown still lurking on the backbenches are about as attractive a choice as Hague and Widdy were in 2001.
    I expect Brown will stand down but I agree that he will and should continue to haunt Labour until the current generation of leadership who were too weak and self interested to remove him have left the political stage.

  • FalseFlagFalseFlag Posts: 1,801
    Student debt delays marriage and harms affordable marriage formation, the unmarried 30s are not our voters, really feel this was a big mistake and societally wrong for the young to be burdened with debt.

    That Labour policy paper is right. The WWC is the soft underbelly, the Conservatives must attack here and explain exactly how Labour has abandoned them. Immigration is the key.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    Conservative majority layable at 3.95 - Just added another £10 liability.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    edited June 2014
    Morning all - OT Today is the 70th anniversary of Operation Bagration, the most devastating Russian offensive of WWII.

    Given all our commemorative events this year, it's also worth remembering that it was the Red army that bled the most.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    JackW said:

    TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT ****

    Do not feed the troll @malcolmg

    Ha Ha Ha , what a baby, big mouthed unionist ARSE abuses poster because he disagrees with his view. What an odious inadequate creep you are. Not happy when people do not fawn over you , poor soul.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736

    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:

    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

    Why do you insist on pretending that Ed has to overturn a 100+ seat majority? I know you don't like him, but the reality is Ed is in quite a different position.
    Er he pretty well does have to overturn a 1987esque majority? Labour only have 29 more seats than they won in 1987 and the coalition majority is 76. add in a green and three extra SNP MPs , four extra non sitting SF MPs replacing labour friendly SDLPs and 8 of the UUP MPs being replaced by more right wing DUP MPs and the scale of Milibands task is similar to Kinnocks.
    60 LAB gains will see Ed as PM IMHO

    34% lab 35% tory 10%ld will mean Ed is PM ON UNS quite likely imho
  • edmundintokyoedmundintokyo Posts: 17,708

    TGOHF said:

    Mail have a leaked Labour strategy paper..

    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2664767/Our-weaknesses-benefits-borrowing-migrants-cost-Election-admits-Red-Ed-former-close-aide-turns-him.html

    A Labour document obtained by The Mail on Sunday suggests that he has also given up hope of winning over new supporters.
    Instead he is pinning his hopes on ‘shoring up’ Labour’s traditional working-class vote.."

    Isn't that Hagues 2001 strategy in reverse. Thats a circle the wagons strategy for avoiding losing what you have not gaining more.

    The difference with Hague's situation is that if you include the defecting LibDems and take into account the funny mood FPTP is in, a Hague-like performance with his own previous supporters and sundry waverers would put Ed Miliband in Downing Street.
  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,703
    John_M said:

    Morning all - OT Today is the 70th anniversary of Operation Bagration, the most devastating Russian offensive of WWII.

    Given all our commemorative events this year, it's also worth remembering that it was the Red army that bled the most.

    Wasn’t Bagration considered strategically unlikely by the Nazi High Command?
  • BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    Excellent thread by Mike. A clear trend I noted a few weeks back.

    I was derided on here by many.
  • anotherDaveanotherDave Posts: 6,746
    FalseFlag said:


    That Labour policy paper is right. The WWC is the soft underbelly, the Conservatives must attack here and explain exactly how Labour has abandoned them. Immigration is the key.

    The Conservatives are continuing Labour's policy of open door immigration.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014
    The Labour Party polling collapse will hopefully be postponed until September 19th. Now that would be an ideal scenario.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503

    John_M said:

    Morning all - OT Today is the 70th anniversary of Operation Bagration, the most devastating Russian offensive of WWII.

    Given all our commemorative events this year, it's also worth remembering that it was the Red army that bled the most.

    Wasn’t Bagration considered strategically unlikely by the Nazi High Command?
    The Germans knew the hammer was going to fall in summer '44; they just guessed wrong by assuming it would drop in Ukraine. The Soviets did their best to encourage them in that belief.
  • bigjohnowlsbigjohnowls Posts: 22,736
    BobaFett said:

    Excellent thread by Mike. A clear trend I noted a few weeks back.

    I was derided on here by many.

    True it was funny to see the bounce back deniers.

    Also most Tory PBers think crossover means a Tory Govt. Quite a few scenarios where that would not be the case even if it happens
  • BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    This thread is utterly hilarious. About two Labourites in a sea of blue.

    It can be summed up by the old PB Golden Meme: Polling vs PB Tory wishful thinking.
  • PulpstarPulpstar Posts: 78,406
    Sorry the last post should read £10 profit/£29.50 liability.

    3.95 Conservative majority is too short.
  • John_MJohn_M Posts: 7,503
    BobaFett said:

    This thread is utterly hilarious. About two Labourites in a sea of blue.

    It can be summed up by the old PB Golden Meme: Polling vs PB Tory wishful thinking.

    Labour supporters seem to consistently assume that 'not Labour' means 'Tory'. It's not so. If it's any comfort, Ed is highly, highly likely to be our next PM.
  • CarnyxCarnyx Posts: 43,336
    http://www.heraldscotland.com/politics/referendum-news/pressure-on-murphy-to-take-on-leadership-of-labour-in-scotland.24558360

    Interesting - a very non-Ed Miliband person being bigged up to take on SLAB, and he is not even a MSP. Quite a vote of confidence in Ms Lamont, too, in the runup to Indyref, in which Trident and ME wars have yet to play their part.
  • BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789

    BobaFett said:

    Excellent thread by Mike. A clear trend I noted a few weeks back.

    I was derided on here by many.

    True it was funny to see the bounce back deniers.

    Also most Tory PBers think crossover means a Tory Govt. Quite a few scenarios where that would not be the case even if it happens
    Over the years my enthusiasm for the fight has waned somewhat - once I have tried to explain something a fifth time in the face of PB Tory confirmation bias, I tend to do something more rewarding. Like the washing up.
  • Sorry to go off topic so early with this betting opportunity.

    Yesterday, I suggested that PBers might like to consider taking SkyBet's 6/4 against Suarez leaving Liverpool during the summer transfer window ..... citing his anti-English rant after he scored two goals for Uraguay against our lot last Thursday.

    Well, this idea appears supported by this story in today's Sunday Times:

    "LUIS SUAREZ will shock Liverpool in the summer by insisting he wants to leave Anfield for a new career in Spain. Real Madrid and Barcelona have approached England’s Footballer of the Year and are ready to meet a release clause understood to be £67.9m"

    Since my post yesterday, the odds against the player's imminent departure have shortened from 6/4 to 6/5, but still value if you believe as I do that this is going to happen.

    As ever, DYOR.

    Yes, this story is strengthened by similar headlines in today's Mail on Sunday:

    "Luis Suarez will spark £100MILLION tussle between Real Madrid and Barcelona as Liverpool struggle to hold on to star man"


    SkyBet have evidently opened up shop this morning, promptly chopping further the odds against Luis Suarez leaving Liverpool this summer from 6/5 to evens.
  • NickPalmerNickPalmer Posts: 21,564
    DavidL said:

    There has undoubtedly been a Labour recovery in the last couple of weeks. The interesting question is why. It has been accompanied by a collapse of Eds personal ratings and a fairly intense media attack along with some infighting which shows there is nothing like the new Labour enforcers scaring people into line. This makes it all the more curious as does the fact that the news on the economy is so consistently good it almost gets boring.

    My guess is that the Tory campaigning got people to focus on areas where Labour was particularly weak such as immigration and the EU and attention has again drifted to the fact the majority see nothing for them in this economic miracle. The Tories need some real wage growth this year to share the gains around a bit. Whether they will get enough of that is hard to say. I suspect that the increases for most will be too modest to be noticed, especially after such a long period of falling real wages. Mike's Tories most votes, Labour most seats bet looks better and better to me.

    I think I'm one of the few people here who is intensively canvassing at the moment, so although it's anecdotal, FWIW my impression is that the increasing politicisation of recent weeks has benefited Labour slightly. People don't think much of any of the leaders but they don't really dislike them either (they're not in the Thatcher/Blair/Brown/Hague league of getting people to say "I am going to vote against..."). A stronger factor among Lab/Lib voters is active dislike of the Conservatives, and all the politics recently has increased their focus on the question of "How do we get the Tories out?" 2010 LibDems have been pretty solid for a long time, but what this is doing is hardening the traditional Labour vote which is the part of the 38% that has been less certain to vote, as I've said here before.

    Wouldn't it be better if people were moving to Labour because they thought we had wonderful policies and a fantastic leader? Sure. But Britain today is a deeply sceptical place about politics, and a lot of floating votes are anti-votes. The more the media write up election-related stories, the more it mobilises them. Tory voters would be the same, but they're still tempted by UKIP, while the WWC flirtation with UKIP seems to be fading.
  • dr_spyndr_spyn Posts: 11,300
    TGOHF said:

    http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2014/jun/21/neil-kinnock-ed-miliband-2015

    Neil Kinnock defends Ed Miliband against 'vindictive agenda' of critics
    Labour party told leader 'has courage to fight hostile media', as other senior figures warn it could be out of power for 15 years

    Looked like a hostile article in The Guardian. Call them in for re-education.

    The falling real incomes started in 2008, it might not be as productive line of attack for Labour as some suggest. Youth unemployment is a weakness for the Coalition, but is comparatively low compared to Greece and Spain.


  • OldKingColeOldKingCole Posts: 33,703
    What will the furore over Iraq do? Will it call up memories of WHY we got involved in the first place. Or is the fact that pretty well no-one at the top of Labour was involved in 2003 mean that Cameron gets any blame?
    Or will we run home to nurse?
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    BobaFett said:

    This thread is utterly hilarious. About two Labourites in a sea of blue.

    It can be summed up by the old PB Golden Meme: Polling vs PB Tory wishful thinking.

    I advised PB before the elections and you immediately after how I saw the summer polls progressing and so it has turned out.

    In the vernacular it's "Dead Ed Bounce"

    But fear not, Labour's turn will come - perhaps even as early as May 2020. Nothing is forever in the buggins turn of British politics.

  • woody662woody662 Posts: 255

    DavidL said:

    There has undoubtedly been a Labour recovery in the last couple of weeks. The interesting question is why. It has been accompanied by a collapse of Eds personal ratings and a fairly intense media attack along with some infighting which shows there is nothing like the new Labour enforcers scaring people into line. This makes it all the more curious as does the fact that the news on the economy is so consistently good it almost gets boring.

    My guess is that the Tory campaigning got people to focus on areas where Labour was particularly weak such as immigration and the EU and attention has again drifted to the fact the majority see nothing for them in this economic miracle. The Tories need some real wage growth this year to share the gains around a bit. Whether they will get enough of that is hard to say. I suspect that the increases for most will be too modest to be noticed, especially after such a long period of falling real wages. Mike's Tories most votes, Labour most seats bet looks better and better to me.

    I think I'm one of the few people here who is intensively canvassing at the moment, so although it's anecdotal, FWIW my impression is that the increasing politicisation of recent weeks has benefited Labour slightly. People don't think much of any of the leaders but they don't really dislike them either (they're not in the Thatcher/Blair/Brown/Hague league of getting people to say "I am going to vote against..."). A stronger factor among Lab/Lib voters is active dislike of the Conservatives, and all the politics recently has increased their focus on the question of "How do we get the Tories out?" 2010 LibDems have been pretty solid for a long time, but what this is doing is hardening the traditional Labour vote which is the part of the 38% that has been less certain to vote, as I've said here before.

    Wouldn't it be better if people were moving to Labour because they thought we had wonderful policies and a fantastic leader? Sure. But Britain today is a deeply sceptical place about politics, and a lot of floating votes are anti-votes. The more the media write up election-related stories, the more it mobilises them. Tory voters would be the same, but they're still tempted by UKIP, while the WWC flirtation with UKIP seems to be fading.
    Nick, what's the level of public sector employment in Broxtowe, a lot higher than the average isn't it
  • OblitusSumMeOblitusSumMe Posts: 9,143

    On the NHS - didn't Ed tell us it was going to die about three years ago? The dead on trolleys in the street and all that? It looks more and more as if Labour's election campaign will be reduced to Making Shit Up.

    Before the winter just past Labour went big on energy prices and the NHS facing a crisis. Had the winter been unusually cold, as many winters since Brown became Prime Minister have been, then both of these issues would have been more important.

    Last winter was the warmest winter since Blair's last as PM.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Good morning, everyone.

    Welcome back, Mr. Gadfly.

    F1: pre-race piece with a tip here:
    http://enormo-haddock.blogspot.co.uk/2014/06/austria-pre-race.html

    Incidentally, there's some divergence of opinion over tyre wear, namely that some say higher wear elsewhere might be handy in Austria because the circuit's low grip, others that high tyre wear for some teams (including Williams) could prove problematic.

    If Hamilton had a DNF that'd be handy for both race and title betting. A Massa win would be splendid. Very hard to see how the race will go.
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    BBC Marr - Chuka chucks over the OWL pledge.

    Owlragous
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    F1: just watching Ted's Qualifying Notebook (up on Sky's site). Hulkenberg's 10th because his time was disallowed for going off the track at turn 8, as many others (including Hamilton) did during qualifying.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014

    DavidL said:

    There has undoubtedly been a Labour recovery in the last couple of weeks. The interesting question is why. It has been accompanied by a collapse of Eds personal ratings and a fairly intense media attack along with some infighting which shows there is nothing like the new Labour enforcers scaring people into line. This makes it all the more curious as does the fact that the news on the economy is so consistently good it almost gets boring.

    My guess is that the Tory campaigning got people to focus on areas where Labour was particularly weak such as immigration and the EU and attention has again drifted to the fact the majority see nothing for them in this economic miracle. The Tories need some real wage growth this year to share the gains around a bit. Whether they will get enough of that is hard to say. I suspect that the increases for most will be too modest to be noticed, especially after such a long period of falling real wages. Mike's Tories most votes, Labour most seats bet looks better and better to me.

    I think I'm one of the few people here who is intensively canvassing at the moment, so although it's anecdotal, FWIW my impression is that the increasing politicisation of recent weeks has benefited Labour slightly. People don't think much of any of the leaders but they don't really dislike them either (they're not in the Thatcher/Blair/Brown/Hague league of getting people to say "I am going to vote against..."). A stronger factor among Lab/Lib voters is active dislike of the Conservatives, and all the politics recently has increased their focus on the question of "How do we get the Tories out?" 2010 LibDems have been pretty solid for a long time, but what this is doing is hardening the traditional Labour vote which is the part of the 38% that has been less certain to vote, as I've said here before.

    Wouldn't it be better if people were moving to Labour because they thought we had wonderful policies and a fantastic leader? Sure. But Britain today is a deeply sceptical place about politics, and a lot of floating votes are anti-votes. The more the media write up election-related stories, the more it mobilises them. Tory voters would be the same, but they're still tempted by UKIP, while the WWC flirtation with UKIP seems to be fading.
    As others have commented putting Cameron into the same demonology that Maggie was is a bit of a challenge and with even Osborne now grudgingly acknowledged to have done an excellent job (or having been extraordinarily lucky, take your pick) I don't see why the anti tory vote would be hardening.

    But it has always been the key to turnout amongst labour supporters and I suppose it always will be. Sigh.
  • ToryJimToryJim Posts: 4,189
    More evidence of something rotten in the Borough of Tower Hamlets.....

    http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/10917142/Arrest-over-car-boot-full-of-voting-forms.html
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    JackW said:

    BBC Marr - Chuka chucks over the OWL pledge.

    Owlragous

    splitting my sides , you ar(s)e so funny
  • JackWJackW Posts: 14,787
    TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT ****

    Do not feed the troll @malcolmg
  • Paul_Mid_BedsPaul_Mid_Beds Posts: 1,409
    edited June 2014

    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:

    Jonathan said:

    JackW said:



    ICM noted in the period July-Sep 86 Kinnock enjoyed a 6/7 point lead that saw him return as LotO at the 87 election. Roll on almost 4 years and the spring and summer of 1991 saw Kinnock again with 6/10 point leads only for Basildon et al to ring his electoral death knell again at the1992 General Election.



    If Ed gains as many seats as Kinnock in 92 he becomes Prime Minister. Even matching Kinnocks 87 performance could see Ed in no10.

    The unique feature of the 2015 GE is that the governing party is not defending a majority and starts from a exceptionally weak position.
    If Ed matches Kinnock's polling turnaround in either of the 86/87 or 91/92 then Ed will poll worse than Gordon Brown - an electoral historical feat that he will match as all post war Labour governments going into their first GE in opposition lose vote share.

    Now there's a thought ....

    Why do you insist on pretending that Ed has to overturn a 100+ seat majority? I know you don't like him, but the reality is Ed is in quite a different position.
    Er he pretty well does have to overturn a 1987esque majority? Labour only have 29 more seats than they won in 1987 and the coalition majority is 76. add in a green and three extra SNP MPs , four extra non sitting SF MPs replacing labour friendly SDLPs and 8 of the UUP MPs being replaced by more right wing DUP MPs and the scale of Milibands task is similar to Kinnocks.
    60 LAB gains will see Ed as PM IMHO

    34% lab 35% tory 10%ld will mean Ed is PM ON UNS quite likely imho
    Electoral calculus gives LD down to 18 seats and Lab 11 short of a majority

    Factor in bias caused by UKIP piling up votes in safe tory seats (meaning equivalent UNS is 36.5, 34, 10) then you have Labour 21 short and only 2 seats ahead of tories with LDs only having 15 seats meaning Cameron would struggle on with DUP support and a minority government until calling a further election (which Lab can ill afford) at a time of his choosing.

    Sorry but the Libdem collapse has eroded the electoral bias in favour of labour and ruined Milipedes 35% strategy.
  • malcolmgmalcolmg Posts: 43,496
    JackW said:

    TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT **** TROLL ALERT ****

    Do not feed the troll @malcolmg

    Ha Ha Ha , what a dullard. Why not give us a pie joke, less infantile. You really are an odious creep.
  • perdixperdix Posts: 1,806

    FalseFlag said:


    That Labour policy paper is right. The WWC is the soft underbelly, the Conservatives must attack here and explain exactly how Labour has abandoned them. Immigration is the key.

    The Conservatives are continuing Labour's policy of open door immigration.
  • DavidLDavidL Posts: 54,014

    On the NHS - didn't Ed tell us it was going to die about three years ago? The dead on trolleys in the street and all that? It looks more and more as if Labour's election campaign will be reduced to Making Shit Up.

    Before the winter just past Labour went big on energy prices and the NHS facing a crisis. Had the winter been unusually cold, as many winters since Brown became Prime Minister have been, then both of these issues would have been more important.

    Last winter was the warmest winter since Blair's last as PM.
    The malevolent effect of that man is almost god like. Only now, as the economy climbs off the floor, is even the climate recovering.

  • PClippPClipp Posts: 2,138
    Two points.

    Not sure that Antifrank is right in putting so much weight on current betting odds to forecast results in 2015. I feel that what is happening on the ground is far more important.

    Has anybody here considered the possibility that the Lib Dem performance in the Euros and in Newark were so dire, that lots of recently inactive people will now be motivated to return to the fray?
  • BobaFettBobaFett Posts: 2,789
    In the interests of fairness and giving credit where it is due, Peter from Putney and Topping are two Tory posters who have also noted the rise in Labour share and have been ignored when trying to draw attention to it.

    Topping has also noted how the bacon etc attacks on Ed have been sinister, unedifying borderline bullying that may even backfire.

    I finally saw Ed's very gallant joke about the sarnie to the fragrant Penny Mordaunt the other day as part of his Queen's Speech response. More proof that Ed can be witty and self-deprecating. He had the whole house laughing - a great response that again gives the lie to the nasty, desperate schoolyard taunts we see in the media, and on here, from time to time.
  • Morris_DancerMorris_Dancer Posts: 61,950
    Welcome to pb.com, Mr. Clipp.
This discussion has been closed.